| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Parents Lose Son at Water Park; Son Drowns; Stepdad Gets 7 Years; Mom Gets 8 MonthsYou're not even going to comment on the fact that he admitted guilt and she didn't, are you? There are facts of the case that you're leaving out intentionally because it doesn't fit your narrative. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/17 02:54 AM |
| 0 | Thank you DadSpecific instances are how individuals live their lives. /u/SharkGlue said single parents can be just as good as a couple, which is demonstrably true. He didn't say they always or even generally are better. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 06:18 PM |
| 2 | Thank you DadYup. Incarceration rates are also a huge factor. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 06:15 PM |
| -4 | Thank you DadProve me wrong then. You'd have to be open-minded to the fact that it's a cyclical problem whereby the lack of wealth, education, and decent jobs results in a lack of accountability. Rinse and repeat generation after generation. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 06:03 PM |
| 1 | Thank you DadHow so? If a parent is abusive in a relationship, then it stands to reason that removing mthat parent from the equation would be the better option. In general, yes, a loving couple is naturally the better option. But for specific instances, sometimes a single parent is better. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 05:13 PM |
| 23 | Thank you DadNot to mention that a lot of the reason that fathers are not around is because of the high rates of poverty to begin with. Incarceration rates, joblessness, lack of quality education, etc. It's all part of the problem. And it's a cyclical. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 05:10 PM |
| -1 | Thank you DadNo, people hate hearing incredibly simplified versions of something that resembles the truth. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/17 05:08 PM |
| 2 | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷Who is the scientist who made that comment? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 08:05 PM |
| 2 | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷He cites one article that even poses the question as to whether difference are biological or environmental/cultural (i.e., the article about how men and women are judged). Other than that he cites wikipedia and psychology journals that do not actually show any evidence that there is a biological mechanism for these differences. And, in fact, there is evidence in his links to support the opposite conclusion. For example, though personality traits for women are fairly consistent across cultures, t… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 08:00 PM |
| 32 | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷No they weren't. He cited specific experimental results (e.g., evidence that shows women are more people-oriented and men are more thing-oriented) then proceeded to draw broad conclusions from them (e.g., those differences "in part explain why women prefer jobs in social or artistic areas"). For that one he cites a psychology science journal article whose conclusions say nothing at all about those results being biological and not cultural/environmental. For his neuroticism claim he links to Wiki… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 07:54 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter