ATXBeermaker Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	No you’re not paid less because you’re a woman... You seem to be conflating two separate issues. The suit brought by the women's soccer team is not about their pay from the world cup. It's about their annual pay from U.S. Soccer based on the amount of revenue they bring in to that organization versus what the U.S. Men's team brings in.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/06/19 08:05 AM
0	No you’re not paid less because you’re a woman... I'm talking specifically about the American teams, which this post (and an associated lawsuit) is about. Not men's and women's international soccer, in general. If you have clear cut data to show that the men's U.S. soccer team brings in more revenue than the women's team then I know a lot of lawyers that would love to see that data.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/06/19 04:00 AM
-4	No you’re not paid less because you’re a woman... The U.S. women's team isn't arguing that they should be paid more just because. Their argument is they they should be paid more because they bring in the same, if not more, revenue to U.S. soccer than the men's team. The revenue dispute is being fought in the courts, but their argument is not a simplistic and without merit as this thread woukd have you believe.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/06/19 10:30 PM
7	Parents Lose Son at Water Park; Son Drowns; Stepdad Gets 7 Years; Mom Gets 8 Months You're not even going to comment on the fact that he admitted guilt and she didn't, are you? There are facts of the case that you're leaving out intentionally because it doesn't fit your narrative.	/r/MensRights	21/12/17 02:54 AM
0	Thank you Dad Specific instances are how individuals live their lives. /u/SharkGlue said single parents can be just as good as a couple, which is demonstrably true. He didn't say they always or even generally are better.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 06:18 PM
2	Thank you Dad Yup. Incarceration rates are also a huge factor.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 06:15 PM
-4	Thank you Dad Prove me wrong then. You'd have to be open-minded to the fact that it's a cyclical problem whereby the lack of wealth, education, and decent jobs results in a lack of accountability. Rinse and repeat generation after generation.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 06:03 PM
1	Thank you Dad How so? If a parent is abusive in a relationship, then it stands to reason that removing mthat parent from the equation would be the better option. In general, yes, a loving couple is naturally the better option. But for specific instances, sometimes a single parent is better.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 05:13 PM
23	Thank you Dad Not to mention that a lot of the reason that fathers are not around is because of the high rates of poverty to begin with. Incarceration rates, joblessness, lack of quality education, etc. It's all part of the problem. And it's a cyclical.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 05:10 PM
-1	Thank you Dad No, people hate hearing incredibly simplified versions of something that resembles the truth.	/r/MensRights	15/08/17 05:08 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Rather than simply throwing stones, why don't you point out more specifically where I'm misinterpreting what he wrote and how? The only thing that he seems to say that Damore argued (and I agree with) is that you should be able to discuss these things without retribution. Otherwise, he is saying that Damore conclusions are tenuous at best. If I were Google, I would have handled it not by firing Damore. However, I would also not force people to work on a team with him. If his worked suffered as a…	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 06:10 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 And when I've pointed that out, people respond and draw further conclusions about my comments, saying things like "so you think every industry should be 50/50 male/female and the disparity is only due to oppression and bias???" They talk about being so adamantly rational but evidence suggests otherwise.	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 05:23 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Still, it is not clear to me how such sex differences are relevant to the Google workplace. And even if sex differences in negative emotionality were relevant to occupational performance at Google (e.g., not being able to handle stressful assignments), the size of these negative emotion sex differences is not very large (typically, ranging between “small” to “moderate” in statistical effect size terminology; accounting for perhaps 10% of the variance1). Using someone’s biological sex to essentia…	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 03:29 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 I see you're going to the typical reductio ad absurdum arguments and, as Damore is so fond of, extrapolating to false conclusions. That said, this is where I get off the train. Cheers.	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 02:54 AM
2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 and... you didn't even mention where he calls google "cultural marxists" and compares them to Stalin and Mao. To be honest, I focused my analysis on the section pertaining to "possible non-bias cause of the gender gap in tech." The rest of it seemed far less scientific as not to even give it a second thought.	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 02:37 AM
0	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 My contention was that he showed zero scientific evidence for his claims. He made a rhetorical argument that was scientific-sounding enough that people who already agreed with him would use as evidence. He never stated the the current gender disparity was completely natural and fine. If the disparity is not natural then there should be initiatives to overcome the bias. And again, he showed zero evidence that any possible biological difference between men and women actually resulted in them being…	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 02:34 AM
3	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Could you show me what research shows the differences are moderate The research that Damore himself cites typically says that the disparities are moderate. Some are more pronounced, but it only means in a scientifically statistically significant amount. It's also the opinion of this psychologist, though of course that is just one informed person's conclusion. and do not explain the levels of disparity between men and women in technical roles I'm sorry, I can't prove a negative for you. I can say…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 09:44 PM
2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 The science he cited isn't bad. The problem is that he draws broad conclusions from it that the science does not really support. For example, setting aside whether there is a biological basis for them, though there are personality differences between men and women, all the research show that most of these differences are moderate and do not explain the levels of disparity between men and women in technical roles. Further, he cites the research and then draws his own conclusions about how specifi…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 08:14 PM
2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Who is the scientist who made that comment?	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 08:05 PM
2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 He cites one article that even poses the question as to whether difference are biological or environmental/cultural (i.e., the article about how men and women are judged). Other than that he cites wikipedia and psychology journals that do not actually show any evidence that there is a biological mechanism for these differences. And, in fact, there is evidence in his links to support the opposite conclusion. For example, though personality traits for women are fairly consistent across cultures, t…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 08:00 PM
32	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 No they weren't. He cited specific experimental results (e.g., evidence that shows women are more people-oriented and men are more thing-oriented) then proceeded to draw broad conclusions from them (e.g., those differences "in part explain why women prefer jobs in social or artistic areas"). For that one he cites a psychology science journal article whose conclusions say nothing at all about those results being biological and not cultural/environmental. For his neuroticism claim he links to Wiki…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 07:54 PM
1	How the media reports female child rapists. I'll take that as a no, you couldn't find any. Of course you would. That's precisely how children think.	/r/MensRights	19/01/17 06:16 PM
0	How the media reports female child rapists. No I wouldn't. But I have better things to do. I'm sure you can handle doing your own Google search there, big guy.	/r/MensRights	19/01/17 04:13 PM
2	How the media reports female child rapists. Right. This is how "The Media" reports female child rapists. I've read many stories of female teachers taking advantage of students in my many years and they all present it as such -- an adult taking advantage of a child. Someone posts this nugget from some less-than-reputable source and claims it's how "The Media" boogeyman portrays these stories. And that's not cherry-picking? That's the definition of cherry-picking. Find something that fits your nonsense narrative and use it as proof.	/r/MensRights	19/01/17 12:15 AM
0	How the media reports female child rapists. Well, I guess the sort algorithm is working then. ;-)	/r/MensRights	18/01/17 11:27 PM
-6	How the media reports female child rapists. Ha! I'll wear the downvotes from this lot as a badge of honor. I see this as a success. If you guys are disagreeing with me that means I'm still a decent human being. Especially when all you do is cherry pick headlines and say, "See!? We've got it so bad!" Whhaaaaaahhh!"	/r/MensRights	18/01/17 11:16 PM
-17	How the media reports female child rapists. I'd really appreciate some help from the members of this sub. You see, I've got this cherry tree and I'm having a hard time picking the fruit off it. You guys seem really amazing at it. Anyone down to help cherry pick? Edit: Did I strike a nerve?	/r/MensRights	18/01/17 06:37 PM