TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AWildAussie Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by AWildAussie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Iirc, they were also more keen on using different versions of it - e.g. yellow pilled, black pill, white pill, etc than your average manosphere traveller.
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 11:38 PM
2

Richard Spencer used it somewhat - but not to the extent MRAs and MGTOW will. As I understand it, to the Alt. Right becoming redpilled means embracing White Nationalism.
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 11:36 PM
1

"alpha" behavior is different species to species. Firstly, the three studies you cited all referred to primates as having traits of "social dominance." So where exactly is the 'between' species incongruity if they do in fact display dominance, aggression and submission? Now, let's say their behaviour does differ. If we're describing three people as a killer and one of them used a chainsaw, another person used a gun and the third ran over someone with a car, the label is not made any less accurat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 08:09 PM
1

"Intelligence can be measured. Why are you using a bunch of analogies where we have had measurements solidified for decades? We cannot appropriately "measure" alpha and beta..." Can you measure personality traits? Can you measure physical aggression, number of offspring, number of sexual encounters & partners, number of marriages? Can you measure a person's anxiety and neuroticism? What's that, you can? Well golly, it's almost as if the analogy perfectly fits and you just like to pretend psychom…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 07:55 PM
1

If you ask three different people what their definition of intelligence is and one of them says "the ability to understand abstract ideas" and another person says "1) fluid intelligence & 2) crystallized intelligence" and the third says "Intelligence refers to a person's cognitive ability. The higher the intelligence score they receive, the better a person's cognitive ability is believed to be." Now you can argue those three definitions are 'different' but in actuality, they're not. They're perf…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 07:43 PM
2

"Sapolsky is definitely smarter than both of us." Good Lord. Argument from authority much? You posted three references and none of them provided the supposed "debunking" and refutation you were looking for. Try again. "Post some articles or studies or something." You're arguing about definitions, not science. The fuck do I need a study for? If you wanna claim "it's not a scientifically accurate concept" then you should be the one backing your claim up with studies. Stop being so fucking lazy as …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 07:34 PM
2

Interesting references (I remember seeing Scott Barry Kaufman's article a long time ago), but they don't exactly seem to be the irrefutable totally pwnt "debunking" that you're looking for. "Many primates have social hierarchies with one most dominant member at the top, but this isn’t something that works for humans. If it was the same, that would mean there was only one dominant male in every community. Men don’t work like that - the guy who’s the confident captain of his rugby team could be sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 07:16 PM
1

Groan While the point you're making has some validity to it in that people are complex, the definitions provided for "Alpha" and "Beta" were perfectly legitimate. If you don't like it you can use "Loser" for Beta and "Winner" for Alpha or "Person who relies on female validation and kisses their ass in order to try and get pussy" vs. "Person who holds women to account, non-neurotic, self-assured. (Typically ambitious)". Yes, people have more personality characteristics than simply "beta" or "alph…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 06:50 PM
1

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejsp.2523 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2329496516663224 "Good mothers received greater custody allocations than did good fathers across a tightly matched pair of vignettes in three culturally distinct samples: Argentina, Brazil, and the United States (Study 1)." Here's a quote. "Child support is a gendered phenomenon, typically involving a transfer of funds from noncustodial fathers to custodial mothers in most cases." https://www.m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 06:00 PM
1

And come on, "wasn't thinking clearly?" This is hardly a defensible stance. Come on. That is my whole point. You're assuming the family court works similar to a criminal court. You're assuming that a family court cares about the rights of men and cares about equality. It doesn't. Anyone who has ever had any experience going through the meat-grinder that is the family court or anyone who has taken a look at the child custody and alimony statistics should know that it isn't about 'equality' whatso…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 05:15 PM
1

"If you've been in such a situation, then I'm very sorry for you. You have been wronged and failed. But your story is an exception and not the rule." Now what makes you think that getting rid of prenuptial agreements is the exception rather than the rule? "If a woman is put under duress when signing a prenup, that is a valid ground to void it." Do you not see how this logic can be used virtually any time a judge wants to? You're moving the goalposts here. "Don't marry the wrong one." "Well okay,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 05:10 PM
1

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/judge-throws-out-prenuptial-agreement-made-under-duress/news-story/d75d47751151748036a42adf3dbf607a
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 05:05 PM
1

From what I've heard, Colttaine takes that view (though I may be incorrect about that). TFM on the other hand doesn't believe it's possible. I'm inclined to agree with him; on paper I'm all for allowing men to 'equally' benefit from the welfare state but I just don't think it'll happen. Men have pretty much always traded resources for sexual access and vice versa. TFM's solution to this is responsibilitism: women can continue to trade sex for resources, the objection to this isn't to end it, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 05:02 PM
2

After seeing more than a few "Chads" roaming around planet Earth I for one can't see any reason to object to restrictions & punitive measures being taken upon them. The average level of recklessness, selfishness and lack of remorse in the typical Chad truly is staggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 04:52 PM
1

Prenuptial agreements don't mean shit in the U.S. and most of the Western world. Judges can just throw them out on the grounds that "the woman was clearly under duress when she signed it" or "she wasn't thinking clearly", etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 04:48 PM
1

The Welfare State + Family Courts. 'Nuff said.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 04:47 PM
1

From all the accounts I've read about evolution, it effectively says humans are vehicles (David Sloan Wilson uses the term 'super-organism' if I'm not mistaken) for self-propagating genes which are self-interested and rarely care about others except if they are genetically related to them, or they benefit them in some way. So yeah, evolution is legitimate science (TM) but it's fairly understandable why an individual would dislike living in a world of other highly self-interested individuals who …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 04:46 PM
1

Women can do whatever the Hell they want (excusing obviously immoral shenanigans like killing, cheating, stealing, etc), just be honest and upfront about it. For a single particular woman to want a high status male is perfectly fine (males have their own mating preferences too, obviously), TRP's complaint is simply that women do this en masse and that too many women seem to think they should barely have to make an effort in order to catch their dream guy. I won't say I've seen a huge amount of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 04:33 PM
1

I'd also like to state for the record that I consider this point, "There was no actual ideal woman figure they were encouraging me to be; there is no salvation for women in their theology" to be a massive problem: since people in TRP vastly differ from one another in what they want women to be, there is little in the way that women can appease these demands. One of the reasons I can never agree with feminism is due to the philosophy that men are always guilty, no matter what they do. If you like…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 03:05 PM
1

In order to dissect this question we first have to understand that TRP is simply one group in the "manosphere" - which is effectively divided into people who are MRAs, people who call themselves MGTOW, people who are married but consider themselves red pilled, people who use TRP philosophy for the sake of PUA, normal people who just want to understand TRP psychology so they can understand the world better (I consider myself the latter), and so forth. And then in other sections of the manosphere …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 02:36 PM
2

The key difference is that an SJW doesn't have anything but their feelings in order to argue that something is wrong. "The West is a patriarchal society which tries to oppress women at every opportunity." "1 in 4 women are raped or sexually assaulted." "Women make 72 cents on the dollar." The problem with these statements isn't simply that they're feelings-based, it's that they're feelings-based statements which are completely separate from factual reality. Not only that, but an SJW is prioritiz…
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 01:27 AM
1

Your original comment seems to be more than a month old so apologies in advance if a response to it is unwanted and unnecessary, but as someone with an interest in the same question I looked at the research myself. The TL;DR I quickly came to was that men were more emotional in regards to specific emotions (i.e. anger) while women reported higher emotional responsiveness in regards to other emotions - specifically, negative emotions. I've seen multiple studies report to show that women show grea…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 04:41 PM
0

"Her Father/Mother Were Present and Are Strong: a present mother teaches her nurturing and provides a role model for how to act. If the mother is strong (not easily influenced and can take care of herself), even better. She's a woman and thus wants to submit to a man, but it's not easy to make her submit. If her father is present, it sets a baseline for men to live up to. If he's strong/dominant (sets firm rules, his wife submits to him, and he's socially dominant and charismatic), better. Women…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 01:34 PM
1

Eh. This fact may be confirmation of TRP theory but it may also be evidence of other ideas. Gender Differences in Neuroticism: Since women are more neurotic it's more likely for them to need help in this area than men would. Something which is supported by the fact that only 2 of the results on the first page are written from the female perspective while the others are gender neutral. Men are less open about emotions and infinitely more so in regards to openly displaying vulnerability. We don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 05:08 AM
2

To put a long story short, I've been busy. I never sought to leave TRP/PPD indefinitely... simply to pool information from other disciplines. TRP is essentially psychological in nature (which for a long time I took little notice of, truth be told). I figured it was only right to lead it back to its source.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 11:36 AM
3

"The more important question is, why women tend to be like-minded?" Anyone who is familiar with The Big 5 should be able to tell you that women differ by half a standard deviation in Agreeableness and also tend to be a bit more Conscientious on average. When the two are put together, that is, someone who is Highly Conscientious and Highly Agreeable - the difference goes from being slightly noticeable to highly noticeable - with women outnumbering men in this aspect at at least a 3 to 1 ratio. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 02:49 AM
3

Blue Pill the subreddit needn't necessarily offer advice, but Blue Pill as a whole doesn't really offer particularly good advice and therefore doesn't seem worth turning to in the average person's eyes. It's sorta like saying "Why are there Psychologists?" Well, they exist because sometimes your friends (however well intentioned) can't always fix your problems. If mainstream society and the media actually did give good advice, then people wouldn't feel a need to turn to PUAs and TRP and all of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 05:52 AM
14

I know this might sound crazy, but there are some people who prefer to go at their own pace rather than just arbitrarily declaring "This is the 1st date, therefore we must go to the movies. This is the 2nd date, therefore we must kiss. This is the 3rd date, therefore we must have sex. This is the 4th date, therefore you must become acquainted with my pet dog..." Instead of assuming the guy's a pussy or the woman is frigid, why don't you just ask them or make a move on them if you really want it …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 08:29 AM
1

"Article about women shaming men for something they have absolutely zero control over" Bitches will be bitches. What more is there to say? Ignore it, and keep moving forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 08:37 PM
1

This isn't r/RednecksAreUs TRP believes women can be in politics, they just shouldn't be there because "It's the current year! Hurr durr! Affirmative Action!" And yes, I'm looking at you, Justin Trudeau.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 08:24 PM
2

TRP believe women can be bitches. Newsflash: Many of them can be. That's why the term 'AWALT' was created in the first place. If this is paranoia, then so be it. How does the expression go again? "Better safe than sorry"? For every person that thinks Hypergamy, AF/BB, Divorce Rape, Sperm Jacking and a bunch of other things are 'complete bullshit' and just 'blatant paranoia' there's a guy who's been suckered in to paying child support when he thought she was on the pill, a guy who's wife has just…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 08:10 PM
1

TRP is providing a tool for Betas to use, but no one is forcing them to use it (or at least, they shouldn't be getting forced to) therefore many Betas will do their own thang and still continue to be Betas (and many of them will have zero issue with this) while many of them will try to utilize TRP but ultimately fail. Another likely outcome of TRP is that men on the whole just end up increasing their SMV which only encourages women to be even more Hypergamous and narcissistic than they already a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 07:53 PM
2

I love this question, since I think it probably has a lot of nuance to it - well, what I mean by that is I sorta see it as "Yes and No, completely depending on how you interpret the question." "Uncomplicated" can mean "Boring" in some instances, "Complicated" can mean "I'll never understand what he's saying (e.g. he talks about Quantum Physics all the time when I really wish he'd ask me about my pet cat or what books I like to read, or w/e)" so in that sense both can be looked at as a negative. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 07:31 PM
1

Deep Voice = Sign of Testosterone (A simple Google with verify this) = Sign of Masculinity = Women are more attracted to Masculine Men Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 07:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter