TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AWildDeku Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by AWildDeku on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Lol, I got DOWNVOTED for that suggestion of making people publicly aware of a psychopath that shoots innocent people... IN THE FACE!? Lol, Reddit is lost, you guys are practically Twitter. I’m done with this soy-marsh. Later faggots.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:05 AM
17

I just posted in r/childless on a post about a T-shirt saying “No forced Motherhood”. I said it was great, and we should also have a shirt that says, “No Forced Fatherhood” with a picture of a full wallet behind it. I was instantly met with downvotes and vitriolic rage. These people are imbeciles, entertaining imbeciles, but imbeciles none the less. I have thus elected to consciously shift my voting habits from center left to republican. They want to be self-righteous pseudo-intellectuals withou…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:01 AM
1

We need her name, face, and residence so that people can know to stay away from this psychopath and spit on her in public.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:52 AM
3

She’s right. I’ll never know what it’s like to be so scared that I carry my keys in my fist like a weapon. I’m not an idiot. I carry a pistol. As a result I’m not scared of anything.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:09 AM
1

I beg to differ. Pearl Harbor happened. Two atom bombs happened. Unconditional surrender happened. Problem solved. I think it’s pretty extreme when you can get 12 years for the bear minimum of circumstantial evidence in the face of exonerating evidence. I don’t think my solution is extreme at all when the rules are so blatantly stacked against your favor.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:38 PM
1

I don’t see how this is surprising. Have you ever seen a woman get caught? Have you ever seen them once legitimately apologize? I highly doubt you have because they all think this way. “Sorry” is always followed by a “but...” and they will find all sorts of justifications for their actions. They all think this way, go ahead and look up all the articles you can on the subject. You’ll find they they never regret it, are never sorry, always justify their actions with the “realization that our relat…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:46 PM
16

Even if you start backing up texts and ensure there is video evidence, that didn’t help this guy. What makes you think it will help you? Simple solution, don’t talk to women unless it is necessary. If you don’t know them, and they suddenly ask you out, the answer is no. If they start touching you, You leave. Are you a CEO? You keep conferences brief, the bottom line clear, and you always have your (male) advisor in the room with you. The only things that should be said to a woman you don’t know …
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:45 PM
1

To be fair I’m talking in terms of culture, not populace.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:21 AM
2

An outlier. The English definition renders the assets to the husband, which was far more common. They had the right idea. Current law provides women with far more opportunity for financial gain. It would appear ye olde English ancestors were preemptively wise. Even they seemed to know that a wife was essentially a burden requiring compensation.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:53 PM
-2

... I mean, you may hate it, but I don’t disagree with it at all. War is a men’s game, period. Equality doesn’t exist and nowhere is that made clearer than in combat. We are naturally bigger, naturally sturdier, naturally more aggressive, with naturally more stamina. There are examples of decent female troops, do not get me wrong, but as far as military women are concerned... they tend to fall into certain... trends. Trends of laziness, self centeredness, and since a ton of people want to fuck t…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:16 PM
15

It used to be that people married for status. If we look toward ye olde Europeans, where much of our culture is derived, marriage was often a joining of households for personal gain between two entire families. You were not so much marrying the woman, but her family, their power, their assets, and their resources and, obviously, the reverse was true. You see, even back then when women were subservient to their husbands, they seemed to know that marriage was a detriment, even with these perks, to…
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 11:53 AM
1

What am I to think of this circus between the two of them. They both admitted to being abusive. Him to her, her to him, him with convictions of violence against other people, her physically abusing her own mother. He was acquitted of rape charges because she cried rape, but only because NEITHER OF THEM could compile a consistent recollection of events. I would have LOVED to have been a juror for that case, and to have watched the jury, prosecutor, judge and defense all staring at each other like…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:07 PM
1

“He claims to still be in love with her. Sending her valentines cards and flowers yearly.”
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:54 PM
5

To be fair, read their Wikipedia article. He doesn’t seem at all traumatized, and they are clearly BOTH insane, violent individuals.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 05:25 PM
6

The feminists in that group are completely retarded... the level of hypocrisy an assertions of “escaping rape” are outrageous.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:52 PM
1

I mean... I’ve done it... if someone wants to accuse me of sexual assault after CPR then I’ll laugh all the way to the court house.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 05:40 PM
1

I’ll have to read all this later. At work. But no, I’m not insinuating that there are more false reports than true ones. I’m just saying the actual percentage is likely higher than 8-10%, and we have no way of knowing either way. If nothing else, the narrative that false accusations are so “excessively rare” is outright false. It is at least sizable, and certainly worth considering. That is my only contention.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:53 PM
2

Not sure I agree with the ideology of his statements... but the methodology DOES have some merit. The FemNPCs were insanely triggered by the MGTOW movement, to the point where they became divided on whether sexual liberation should be the key point of focus, or commitment should be a virtue. It really does fuck with the status quo of their argument when men start acting with chaste and reproach, because it destroys their self centered narrative. It COULD be a useful tool to send a message. Howev…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:09 PM
5

It’s not only hypocritical, but wrong. Last fiscal year the FBI released it’s statistics for 2017 on a multitude of case of various crimes committed, taken to court, convictions, and dropped cases (as well as relative costs in taxes and to federal institutions but that isn’t really relevant). If memory serves correct, On the subject of rape, about 6% were provable beyond a shadow of a doubt, and thus resulted in a conviction... however... 8-10% drug through courts and appeals were provably FALSE…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:59 PM
2

It could also just be a good deterrent from the mind numbing accusations of “mansplaining” as well.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:42 PM
7

“Appeal to flawed logic.” Feminists spread their nonsensical ichor here when they are feeling froggy. One of the classic lines of dialog in the FemNPC logic tree is, “I’m so sick of MEN talking about...” By including the fact that this was made by a woman, this forces the FemNPC to argue an actual point, rather than to dismiss the argument on the basis of gender outright. Which usually means they will not attempt to argue at all... since rational, malleable ideas that are transformative to the s…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:39 PM
1

Where’s the surprise? She’s famous, and she’s a selfish cunt. All par for the course, my boy.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 03:32 PM
13

The feminists failed themselves in a manner so retarded I can scarcely believe the stupidity required... we are witnessing... the “idiot singularity”. The result result of a movement full of raging ideologs that burned through all of their victim narratives and have finally collapsed within themselves. They literally had everything. They had domestic, civil, and criminal courts. They had marriage. They had high societal value coupled with low expectations. They had universities... All these fert…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:04 PM
2

When we discuss feminists, they absolutely never get the benefit of the doubt. They believe there is a patriarchy that somehow invariably comes at male expense, they believe in a wage gap that doesn’t exist regardless of how often they are objectively proven wrong. They believe in rape culture that doesn’t exist. You NEVER give a feminist the benefit of the doubt. When someone says they are a feminist, they are guilty of stupidity until proven innocent, just like any man accused of sexual assaul…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:08 PM
0

Perish the thought of ever giving them the benefit of the doubt. You’re talking about a radical group with Marxist views that generated an entire dictionary of jargon with the explicit intent of shutting out dissent. Groups like that never deserve the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:33 PM
2

Okay... so?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:47 PM
3

I live in America where the metoo movement calls even the president a rapist. I think I’ll be just fine.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:42 PM
5

It’s called fascism. A particularly devious and malicious form of it indeed. It requires an intensely methodical process with a sadistic mindset from start to finish, and it’s all about ensuring that opposition can never possibly have a voice. They change the very definition of words to ensure they can only be used against opposition, and never against themselves, even when they do the same exact thing. They know they are rubbish. Nothing short of blatant, premeditated evil.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:42 AM
21

Mutually ensured destruction. The #metoo movement has consistently spewed such rhetoric as “I believe victims” and “not guilty does not mean innocent”. That being said, we should all take to her social media and call her a rapist, repeatedly, and as often as possible. After all, the courtroom “has no bearing on the court of popular opinion”.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:27 AM
6

All I see is cuckholdry.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:21 PM
4

No she won’t, because I’ve been doing that for months. My posts were civil, and completely uncontested. They won’t give you the time of day. They have become so fastened to their eco chambers that they honestly believe they do not need to have a discussion. They honestly expect that everyone is supposed to agree with them and, if someone doesn’t, they are attention seeking trolls that don’t deserve the decency of a response. On the one hand, my posts might have changed a few people’s perspective…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 04:34 PM
1

Uhhhh... I know, I know, Poe’s Law and all that... but I’m pretty sure this is satire. I mean... I thought it was hilarious. I’d hang it in my room.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 12:06 PM
1

So... feminine genetics... so because they are female. I mean, you can say literally anything all you want but when we account for specific examples such as child rearing, pregnancy, a disposition to females being more likely to claim illness and being less likely to commit to overtime, and the inherent social bias females exhibit after birth as oppose to the objective bias males exhibit where social factors simply are not at all present, putting on full display that men an women are genetically…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:55 PM
1

Actually, you should probably word that differently. When you see such a widespread gap between men and women everywhere, it is because they are women. That is exactly the basis through which all positive and negative posturing on the discussion derives itself from, but it isn’t the subject of the debate. Where correlation not being causation would more appropriately apply is with the claim that “there is a pay gap, so there is discrimination against women.” We already know that men and women ar…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:07 PM
5

I used to be a pretty avid liberal, but looking back on it now I was, perhaps, well rooted somewhere in the left leaning center of the political scale. My malcontent first started when the rape hysteria reached fever pitch a few years ago. Despite the fact that I felt like I was reasonably addressing both sides of the issue, I was often slammed with pejoratives and hate comments. Before, I was able to rationally look at the fact that prostate cancer research and recourse is unbelievably underfun…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:37 AM
5

I’m really confused by his example as well. If someone is acquitted of murder, but the evidence suggest law they committed first or second degree manslaughter... then they’ll probably be charged with manslaughter, the appropriately lesser charge to murder. Justice still has it’s recourse. If someone is accused of a rape that did not occur or cannot be proven to occur... then what? You accept social stigmatization as an appropriate consequence of being accused? We have people undermining the conc…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:04 AM
-1

I really want to know how admission isn’t enough. I’d also really like to know how you’re just fine with your argument inherently assuming guilt rather than innocence. Really?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:19 AM
5

The implications of this special example of mental gymnastics are outrageous. How long until it is realized that one has a high probability of getting arraigned with a mere few hours in prison does the fear of consequence subside? We imprison people for tax evasion, for corrupt business practices, for theft. But ruining someone’s ability to be prosperous, destroying their careers and reputations. Really, what’s the harm, right? No, the punishment should obviously be severe. There’s no argument t…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:16 AM
1

No, because your argument is flawed in every fashion and I do not require any amendment. Allow me to repeat myself... because I apparently have to. I’ll break it down Barney style: A.) I doubted you were correct. Good job on the research. I might have thanked you, but execution needs work, though. Especially your condescending attitude, which will bite you, because, as I’ve already stated, I don’t care about the validity of your claim post inebriation. Your massive walls of text were not only a …
/r/MensRights11/04/18 06:21 PM
1

Getting real sick of these incredibly poor arguments revolving around women and alcohol. A martini doesn’t suddenly absolve you of any responsibilities for your actions.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:28 AM
2

Pause, this is just blatantly incorrect. I’ve sure been severely drunk, as many have been, and am perfectly capable of coming to the determination that I am unable to drive, as many do. So not only do I severely doubt the validity of this claim as far as culpability goes, it also wouldn’t matter whether it is valuable or not. It would behoove you as a responsible adult to make responsible decisions whilst you are still responsible, in other words, sober. Before the drinking even began she should…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:25 AM
24

You see I REALLY wouldn’t have a problem with this... But the odious, modern feminists would have to accept a few realities first... I’m fine with men being regarded as utilities. Men have evolved with a utilitarian design; hunting, gathering, fighting, and protecting. Ah, but women... women evolved to bear young; maintain social relations, nest, and child rear. So no abortions, I’m afraid. Denying your genetic responsibilities, who do you think you are? I think at the core of the MRA argument i…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:07 AM
1

I didn’t realize you were the resident reddit art critic. When I was in high school, we took a field trip to a museum of modern art where they hosted a woman who did a live action art piece that literally consisted of her pouring dirt on the floor and making three piles... I think we’re well beyond “bad” by over a decade now. Hitler, on the other hand, has become a massive meme. In order to get the meme, one must have an understanding that “Hitler was bad.” No one in their right mind would see h…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:40 AM
2

It’s gotten so bad they honestly believe men do not have the right to decent debate. I’ve posted plenty of polite, well reasoned dissent pieces to r/feminism on multiple occasions, and never once have I gotten a response. Being inflammatory just allows them to hypocritically break out their “male tears” mugs and collectively heckle with supreme smugness with the rest of their harpies. Polite, reasoned discussion? Cue the crickets, because anything that legitimately challenges a narrative most in…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter