TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A_Pathological_Liar Archive

View 15 posts and 491 comments by A_Pathological_Liar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
45

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights15/05/11 10:53 AM
12

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights05/04/11 04:11 PM
11

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:34 PM
8

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:00 PM
8

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:10 PM
7

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:48 AM
7

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights10/05/11 03:37 PM
6

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:17 PM
2

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:54 AM
1

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:08 PM
0

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:26 PM
0

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:51 PM
0

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:33 AM
0

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:25 AM
0

A_Pathological_Liar/r/MensRights12/04/11 11:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You forgot patriarchy. And you had an /s in there for some reason.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:29 PM
30

Young... Good man less good tries to do something original Okay for a charity Awesome! that helps men. Horrible! Evil! Burn it in fire!
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:28 PM
–

A charity run discriminates against the fat kids I'm pretty sure they encourage the fat kids to do this. It descriminates against amputees and para/quadraphlegics, though.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:26 PM
-9

Men are at an advantage as employees on the basis that they don't have periods, or pregnancies, or menopause. Isn't this why women's healthcare is more important and pronounced than men's healthcare, to balance out the biological aspects, to help women compete on more even ground?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:22 PM
3

I know what it comes down to, though. It seems that Reiss should not have... put all her eggs in one basket. Yeeeah. Well done.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:26 PM
–

I'm sure a feminist lawyer somewhere could argue that it's rape, if she had any interest in protecting the guy.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:25 PM
5

I will tell you otherwise. Because I'm the unicorn named Scooty.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 11:27 AM
1

These comments have me pretty confused.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:53 AM
1

I assumed that is what you were trying to goad me into saying. I'm not trying to lead you to say anything, man. I'm trying to convince you that it's a waste of time to support trans-issues. I'm not sure of another way to put it. I am not well versed in that. If someone from that community would like to correct me, I would appreciate it. I spent a considerable amount of time reading up on it. Transgenderism is a condition caused by a testosterone release(or lack of one) while a fetus is still dev…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:47 PM
1

You don't need to dumb down your argument. I know why you think that. I'm not questioning your egalitarian nature, I'm complaining and concerned that our efforts are wasted trying to support them when this happens: Trans-women were once men.... Their rights are our rights. Transsexualists(Sp?) will argue with R/MR that is condescending and purposefully hurtful to victims of transgendered discrimination, which is actually true. and trans-men are now men. Their rights are our rights. And this is t…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:35 PM
1

Don't strawman me, Anna. You're better than that. This isn't about the people, it's about whether or not there's any real purpose or benefit in having their issues in Men's Rights. I get that you're an egalitarian, we've been down that road before, but if you're silly enough to want to support trans-battles in a Men's Rights space, I sincerely hope you don't waste any more of our time.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:25 PM
1

And this is the same exact shit that gets us distracted from actual Men's Rights issues. You say that, and a flame war will break out over it. You were there the last 3 times it's happened. I'm saying it's not worth the effort and the following distraction. Let trans groups handle it.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:17 PM
1

Okay, so there's at least one person who agrees with me in this.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:06 PM
1

I didn't say trans rights aren't mens rights. I said it's not worth the time determining if the transexual is a man or a woman, following that there also needing to be an evaluation of whether or not a mens rights violation exists at all.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:04 PM
-1

And exactly who are you to proclaim what is reality and not perception? You toss that phrase around so casually and condescendingly as if the people you are talking to don't have some vested interest in reality. There's a certain level of ambiguity when dealing with transsexuals, and the core of the problem is perception. You advocate for a grey area where personal perception(and outwardly, the perception of others) to define genders. The opposite idea here being uniformity through a singular de…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:03 PM
6

Actually, you're right. I've only got two left in the bottle before I'm out. Was supposed to pick up the refill last friday, but I got caught up in other things.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:57 PM
5

.. Real men don't wear skirts. They wear kilts and eat haggis and hate snakes and love bagpipes.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:55 PM
1

R/MR, brother. Not Men's Rights as a whole. I'm jaded because I'm tired of giving a damn while watching idiots here chase their own tails about things this subreddit has nothing to do with.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:52 PM
1

We're not 'White Men's Rights'. We're Men's Rights. Getting into the racial war is pointless and will not help us now, or in the future. I'm pretty jaded about Men's Rights right now. I'm tired of people trying to win popularity contests with other redditors when there are posts about grievous Men's Rights issues getting ignored or buried in downvotes by hate brigades while irrelevant posts get upvoted and have the most attention.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:44 PM
0

Racism isn't our fight. We're looking out for all men, regardless of race. If you want to read about racial rights, there's r/racism for that. It's important, but I don't give a damn about it when it's posted here. Bullshit racism stories getting posted her distract from what we should be worried about. 3, Transexualisim , no, thats something thats important as was evidenced by the response to the footage of the tg kicked into a seizure by two black women at a mcdonals. And do you remember what …
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:22 PM
5

This is the kind of shit that inspires Little Rascal clubs, really.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:33 AM
9

And yeah. I think it's safe to say that. I've said it in the past, and I'll say it again. OneY is where feminist subscribers of 2X and subscribers to R/Feminisms leave their husbands when they want to have girl-talk. It really has nothing to do with these posts, either. It's the sheer amount of blatant double standards that some guys in that community have when it comes to how they treat people, especially women.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:18 AM
12

I'd really just like to point out one thing about these posts. submitted # days ago by Kita Kita also has roots going into AgainstMensRights, a hate group positioned against the rights of men. I almost want to say its unfair to claim feminists are doing this to OneY. As much of a disdain as I have for the feminist conspiracy, I'm pretty sure this is just one misandrist cunthole doing what misandrist cuntholes do best. Being misandrist cuntholes.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:13 AM
-6

I don't really care about the first 2, and neither should the subreddit. These fringe groups come here advocating whatever issue they have going on, and it detracts from what we should be focusing on. Do I like racism? It's funny, sometimes(Reference: Avenue Q), but that doesn't mean we should bring up racial issues when we should be focusing on issues revolving around men's rights. What in the hell is 'Transexualism'? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transsexualism That. Though I use it the same wa…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:51 AM
0

Yeaaah. You're arguing in circles, he's merely stepped out of the loop and pointed it out. You've essentially said that transsexuals should be afforded whatever gender they want, but you advocate both for and against an in-between status for them. Personally, I think we should just lump them into their own new, or neutralized gender group and be done with it. Ignore it from now on, because it's not important. This discussion just distracts us from what we should be worried about: Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:07 AM
1

RACIST, woman hating white men. The worst creatures on earth... So, which planet did all of the racist, homophobic misandrist feminists get off to?
/r/MensRights18/09/11 04:54 PM
3

Is that what I stepped in? Seriously. It's got me mind-blown too. This privileged shit is always the same crap, and all it does is bait people into flame wars about how one side doesn't or does have more of it.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 04:45 PM
1

ill is simply grossly transphobic. Like everything else r/transphobiaproject doesn't agree with. Hey! I don't agree with that! Transphobia! By that same line of thinking, stating that black people possess dark skin is also racist, and saying that homosexual men are sexually attracted to other men is homophobic. Might want to check your victim card, I think you're out of room for stamps.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:33 PM
-1

rates rising for those who lost a job due to bias (55%) Welcome to the minority club. We have jackets and cigars in the back. A staggering 41% of [trans people] reported attempting suicide compared to 1.6% of the general population, That couldn't have anything to do with the fact that they're mentally ill, right? That's quite a bit like saying haemophiliacs have an increased rate of injuries compared to genetically healthy individuals. had low household income, or were the victim of physical ass…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:44 PM
-3

You're supposed to put a 'Since' in that, or it ruins everything. It's a joke. You know, like r/transphobiaproject.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:16 PM
-3

... because knowing the birth gender means that they will then cease to see the trans woman for the woman that she is. R/TransphobiaProject: Blatantly encouraging deception since inception.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:30 AM
6

You're missing a bit of info there. Only pretty girls are put at the windows/register. Ugly/fat women and pretty much all men are stuck in the back with the broilers/irons. It's because their managers believe that cute, perky breasted girls attract more customers to come in if they put them up front, while the less aesthetically pleasing individuals(and men of any variety) get stuck in the back. It's not true for all fast food restaurants, obviously, but it's true for enough of them, as it's fai…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:30 PM
-6

Because we have sympathetic morons who play to victim politics, regardless of their relevancy to the MR cause. It's a built in feature of the male gender to want to take care of things. Not surprising that, as misguided as we sometimes are, that we would umbrella others into it. I don't agree with it either. As far as I'm concerned, those communities have enough support without us needing to get involved. We have our own, much larger, much less socially acknowledged problems.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 03:03 PM
-4

So good of you to pick up on my lack of sympathy. Truth be told, I've dealt with the TPP in the past. The community(read: The people there who didn't write the side bar) as a whole is far more interested in comment karma and social status than they are with educating people who need it.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:53 PM
0

I was under the impression that genuine transsexualism was a problem caused by neurological/developmental issues pre-birth, such as not having the levels of testosterone required to cause the gender specific changes. Edit: Though I'm sure that in the vastness of human intellect, there's room for a psychological issue to present itself that would inspire transsexual behaviors. Some people just don't feel right with who they are, not matter what corrective procedures they go through.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:46 PM
-6

Is there a particular reason you feel the need to STRAWMAN me?
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:29 PM
-1

queers, LGBTs, feminists, anarchists Funny how you lump people who want rights and protections with people who seek to abolish protections. It's even more hilarious that you think feminists act in the best interest of transexuals/transgenders just for the "trans" status. It's cute how naive you are. Regardless, your needless nitpicking over who helps the trans communities will only serve to generate resentment. That's why feverent extremist squads like the TransphobiaProject crash, burn, and ult…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:27 PM
-5

You're looking for a fight, aren't you? Right back at you.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:19 PM
-8

If the truth is insulting, then I apologize for you feeling insulted.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 02:19 PM
2

Welp, you can go straight to hell. Support, even for misguided reasons, is still support. If you're willing to scorn that, go ahead. Don't be surprised when that support gets withdrawn and actual transphobia gets created in its place when people do shit like this.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:00 PM
-10

What, you mean you have a reason outside "looking to get offended", "share with other people to incite anger", and "argue fruitlessly" to be here? It certainly isn't for education or curiosity's sake. The folks over at TransphobiaProject wouldn't know education if a teacher slapped them in the face with a copy of War and Peace.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:53 AM
-9

Oh good. You got here before the rest of the lynch mob. Such a good little flame war baiter you are. Want a cookie?
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:42 AM
-3

Hey, look. Incoming downvote brigade. I do enjoy this. The folks over at the r/TransphobiaProject really know how to get a virtual, brainless lynch mob going.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:36 AM
7

Oh. So long as I know I'm not going crazy. Cripes. I'm sitting here reading it and I hit the next sentence thinking "I KNOW WHAT THIS IS GOING TO SAY NEXT. I CAN SEE THE FUTURE."
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:47 PM
7

.. Why does this comment look familiar..? Didn't I see this comment in r/politics a few days ago? Or maybe it was that reddit.com post..
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:36 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 12:32 PM
2

The article did mention that unemployed men are unaccepted by pretty much everyone, though I agree that the lack of focus of that unacceptance is rather annoying, when I'm sure it does its fair share of homewrecking.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:56 AM
11

That's pretty depressing. I can only imagine what must've gone on in this kid's head to make him want to do that.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:52 AM
0

don't say where you're from. Great. Now we have to hide where we're from because it might speak about our ideals that people don't like? you just need to get rid of those loud assholes who mess everything up for you. Those loud assholes deserve representation too. They're angry, and rightfully so. I haven't seen many men campaign for prostate cancer funding for example. You're not looking hard enough. Generally, no one gives a shit about mens issues except for the men that note the inequalities.…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:34 AM
1

True that. There's no such thing as bad publicity.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:57 AM
4

I want TRAPS. Trust, in me and the ability to trust her. Respect, for who I am, not what I'm worth in coins and bills. Appreciation, for the things I will do for no other reason, for no other person. Protection, for when my worlds come crashing down in moments of weakness. Sex, for feeling absolutely amazing.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:28 AM
3

Wow, that IS an amazing post. Someone needs to bug Kloo to put that up somewhere.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:20 AM
44

So, this is like.. robbery at knife point and attempted murder, right?
/r/MensRights02/06/11 04:02 PM
1

you wanna keep fighting for a lost cause??? Yep.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 03:45 PM
0

I know you are. That's why I called you brother. I just don't think I could bring myself to flee the country if things get worse, and I doubt there's anything aside from a very good point that would make me stop trying to stand up for what we fight for.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:53 PM
-1

Life is short: I'd rather live mine knowing that my sons and nephews won't have to consider running away from their problems and (hopefully) live out my elder years in a world my brothers and I helped foster. If you're content with running away and not standing to make a difference in the lives of others, especially and at least those you care about, so be it. I cannot find peace in self-imposed exile.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:40 PM
5

The MRM must succeed It will, brother. Best solution is to support True Equality: no sexist double standards, fair treatment for all, personal freedom. I think its important that we should work towards equality while retaining our individuality, including individual rights groups for genders. It means the gender war will likely rage on until the end of time humanity, but so long as there's 2 people getting angry, there's one guy looking at them saying "Cripes, they both have a point."
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:32 PM
-1

It may have solved your(individaully speaking, not you specifically) problem, but it didn't solve the problem that a system like that exists.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:25 PM
-1

Discretion is the better part of valor. Its better to retreat and fight another day than to die. Avoiding the system and 'Live to fight another day' are two very different things, brother. Live to fight another day implies that in some day in the future, you will fight again. Running away from (wage) slavery due to an justice-broken system and not coming back ain't gonna solve that problem.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:15 PM
0

Conversations like these are why I avoid R/politics.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:10 PM
0

I wonder what the people who died trying to get over the Berlin Wall would have made of your argument. I'm sorry, how are we in a situation similar to those folk? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:04 PM
1

"Give me liberty or give me death" implies that you're willing to stand against injust opposistion, even and especially violent opposistion. I think it's more accurate to say "Give me liberty or I'll find it elsewhere," if you think abandoning the problem is the appropriate response.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:53 PM
0

Probably better said, but considering the size of what we'd be running away from, I think we'd be just as much at risk as our kids are.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:45 PM
-1

Again with the honor? What you're suggesting is hardly a more 'honorable solution.' The 'honorable' thing to do would be to stay and fight the injustice so that folks aren't subjected to this again. If you keep running from your problems, eventually your problems will find you again.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 11:00 AM
-3

There is no shame in hittin' the bricks when there is no honor in being a slave. If you're bringing honor into the conversation, there's no honor in running away either.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 10:51 AM
1

Take everything I have stated with a grain of salt, and do your own investigation. I don't really think they need to. While it's good to be skeptical of most things, you haven't said anything about Scientology that isn't true. Scientology is a seriously "Lawful Evil' cult. They've paid off-duty cops to go in uniform to harass dissenters, they live in communals(minus the exceedingly wealthy ones that cling to like leeches). Scientology is a seriously deraged socological experiment gone horribly, …
/r/MensRights02/06/11 10:47 AM
-5

Wow. Isn't this borderline "If you don't like it, leave?"
/r/MensRights02/06/11 10:12 AM
3

Not really sure why you're getting downvoted here. I have a...salty tongue, heh People unaquainted with Naval English will probably not understand you here. I wouldn't be surprised if they related it to some sort of sexual joke. lol
/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:00 PM
2

Tl;DR: The outcry of an old(?) man who is so afraid of women that he can't enjoy the company of one. Concern troll. While I'm sure there's plenty of people here that feel compelled to agree with you because of personal experiences, I don't. This poorly written autobiography is an excellent subject to showcase the next time I need to cite someone who is paranoid and socially destructive trying to be a larger, wiser voice. Brothers, this is blatant fearmongering and just plain bad advice. You don'…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:26 PM
4

computer programers less stressful They also pay well. I loled.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:02 PM
1

Wow. That's hilarious. Especially when he talks about screwing her little sister.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 01:51 PM
4

This r/MR is not your personal army.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 01:42 PM
1

I haven't seen this video yet, but.. The McWays(the northern branch) have had a large landscaping business for professional sports teams including baseball, football, and lacross and have reputable clients extending along the east coast primarily in the New England reigon. The McWays(southern branch) are donors to the Writer's Guild. Not sure if that would qualify anyone for a nobel prize, but it's worth noting. The Sheltons, those that are in the US, adopted and raised 3 children, all of which …
/r/MensRights31/05/11 01:22 PM
2

I hate to be 'This guy', but you're talking about the Salvation Army. Salvation has nothing to do with the services they provide. Salvation is a reference to their evangelical dogma, the decidedly western christian one. They're prudish about sex regardless of gender. They do a lot of preaching to their shelters and support, and it keeps them in business because they have Salvation Army stores just like Goodwill has their retail boxes. The Salvation Army is pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 12:46 PM
1

Does anyone else think this looks like that feminist love letter spotlight we saw a week or so ago?
/r/MensRights31/05/11 12:30 PM
1

I don't know why, but this was literally the first thing I expected to see on this thread.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 12:26 PM
18

As much as it pains me to say it, your suicide attempt probably made her realize how much of an impact she(and really, people) has on other people. As individiuals, we tend to see ourselves as less significant than we actually are when it comes to interacting socially with someone. When we stand to the side and observe the same behavior, we go "Wow, wtf is that shit?" As twisted as it sounds, there's a certain strength that a person needs to have in order to overcome the basic instincts to live.…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:44 AM
12

TIL women are lying cunts In my profound and prolific experience as a liar, I disagree with this. You want to know who lies the most? 8-11 year old children of either gender. Oh. And politicians. But we call that 'playing politics', and not lying. edit: And cops. edit x2: And lawyers. edit x3: And judges. edit x4: You know what? Pretty much everyone tied to the judicial system.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:07 AM
1

You know, I think I can settle for having a naturally sexist and racist dog. So long as he doesn't go around biting folks, I don't really care.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:03 AM
1

I own a dog that hates men(Except me) and anyone black, for some reason. I've had him since he was a puppy and trained him to do basic things(Come, sit, beg and roll) Any stranger that's female that approaches him, he's fine with. Any stranger that's male that approaches him, he growls. Anyone who is black and darked skin, he will bark and growl at, even if its a woman. Weirdest thing is I have NO idea why he's aggressive against some folk, but not to others.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 03:08 PM
1

Damn straight. Spirit animal? More like Spirit Machine. Yeaaaaaaah. Although I think I would have a coffee grinder as a spirit machine.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:55 PM
2

You bastard. You got the wolf? I got a goddamned goose.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:54 PM
2

Glad you qualified that with 'Generally,' I can't figure out what I'm going to eat for dinner on a regular basis, let alone make decisions about something important without worrying.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:50 PM
0

This is going to sound very misongnish, but.. They put women with other women so they could be judgement free? Does anyone else see something counter-productive about that? It's like keeping the matches next to the gasoline in attempts to prevent explosions and fire disasters. Suffice it to say that, in my experience, women are far more (openly) critical of other women than men are of women.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:35 PM
-4

You stole the words out from under my fingers.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:30 PM
3

Funny story. Recently met up with a buddy of mine from high school. I told him that he looked like hell. He told me I looked gay. I said "Is that a problem?" He stopped for a second, gave me a weird look, then said. "Nah, not really. I had no idea you were gay, man." I then explained to him that I'm not gay, and married to a woman.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 10:41 AM
1

Did you not see that comment? Clearly its on MSNBC. No, I didn't. I didn't linger on this post or keep up with the comments. I assumed it was real regardless, just questioned the source. We can debate all day about the morality of a teacher having sex with a student. There's no reason to debate. We agree on the morality. It's pretty immoral. However, nowhere is it mentioned she used her status as a means to coerce these men into having sex with her. If she's willing to get into an orgy with 5 me…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 06:01 PM
2

a body shot. When I read this, the next work that came into my mind was "Wanker!" I've been playing too much Team Fortress 2.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 04:43 PM
2

Considering the source, I'd be surprised if this happened at all. For the sake of conversation, I'll assume it did happen. There would be a lot more outcry if this was a male teacher and female students, but all we can really ask for is that the law is enforced. Maybe, maybe not. It's hard to tell these days. I don't really agree with a law that prohibits people from having certain types of relationships. I think that's best left up to whatever establishment they have in common. She probably sho…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 04:40 PM
2

Eh. It's hard to say if society is shaped by art or if art is shaped by society. Both are probably true to an extent, but ultimately any actions that are taken by folks are ultimately their own decisions. It's unfair to blame a movie/song/game/book/magazine/comic book on the unchained actions of another.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 02:18 PM
2

Lol. Did you read my comment to that comment? My wife's mother(My MIL) keyed her ex husband's car and cut the tires, because she thought(I don't know if he did or not) he was cheating on her. When she heard her listening to that song and singing along with it, my wife snapped at her.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:59 PM
3

As much as I disagree with the message, I don't think we should stifle music or art. News casters, politicans, advertisements? Free game. Artists, musicians, writers(creative, not journalistic), I think its important to preserve their ability to produce art that is representitive of their personalities and the times we live in. If anything, they're giant signs of 'Hey, this is acceptable. Ain't that some shit?" Funny story about that country song with the chick beating the shit out of that guy's…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:54 PM
11

It goes both ways. Not that it's worth getting into a pissing contest over, but it's safe to say that music is fairly free of political correctness. Eminem's early stuff(He's cleaned up a bit since then) talked about and laughed about dragging a woman's body into the woods and murdering her. Eminem and Rihanna actually worked together(fairly recently, within the last 2 years I think?) on a piece that's about an abusive woman and an abusive man basically screwing each other. Take a look at 'Love …
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:47 PM
1

FUCK YOU. Fuck you twice actually. This is an enticing offer. ;)
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:35 PM
7

You know, I think I'm okay with the events of what happened here. I'd envy the male teacher that has a harem of students tending to him. It's unethical, but not unlawful(well, most places its not.) But yeah. This website is pretty stupid as a source, and this is really stretching to meet the definition of a Men's Rights issue, unless she actually managed to force all 5 guys into doing that, or if they were under age and she received a lighter sentence for being a woman.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:34 PM
3

2 things: A)Judging from this person's writing style and vocabulary use, I'm willing to bet this is the same troll I keep calling illiterate. B) redditor for 16 hours Pretty sure it's just a troll.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:39 AM
1

I posted a question in /r/feminisms Well, this is where you went wrong, mate.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:32 AM
1

I misread 'between teens.'
/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:04 AM
1

I think producing it should be illegal, but viewing it should not be illegal. Producing and distrubting, yes. Possessing or viewing, no. The application of th law has way too many holes in it to be able to effectively prosecute someone for possessing or viewing it, and it's way too easy to sabotage folks. What is especially disturbing is the guy who got charged with CP for having cartoons with nudity of minors. CARTOONS ARE NOT CP. Agreed. I think the people who see drawings as CP are more offen…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 10:55 AM
1

Thanks for an open minded attitude. Thanks for the back-handed compliment. The problem is it is so taboo it must not even be discussed. Child pornography isn't 'so taboo' as much as it 'isn't relevant' to Men's Rights. Men get jailed for a movie of themselves jerking off when they were 12. Do they victimize themselves? Men get jailed for filming legal sex acts with their 17 year old girlfriend, above the local age of consent. Knox vs USA was jailed for having movies of adolescent girls fully dre…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 10:46 AM
1

I really wish I had something to reply to. I like how you talk about patriarchy, though.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:45 PM
1

Sorry, I had to read this post like.. 4 times in order to understand what you were saying. I THINK what you're saying that R/MR is seperated by sex enthusiastic libertarians and conservative and protective fathers. I had post here blocked that were writing about ACADEMIC RESEARCH in peer reviewed journals, showing that prohibition of child porn increases child abuse crimes. ... Uh, dude. If you wrote the article, I wouldn't be surprised if it were downvoted into oblivion. My internal editor is s…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:40 PM
1

If they didn't call us those things it would mean we weren't a threat to them. And I want to be a threat to them. This reminds me of something I heard once. It follows the same train of thought of 'The biggest insult is to be ignored.' I think you're spot on with this. They wouldn't try to undermine us if we weren't worth undermining, right? Though, I'd rather convert (some of) the feminists into MRAs, rather than have them eternally pissed at us.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:25 PM
1

It will get us attacked more What doesn't kill us, right?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:16 PM
2

Point of interest in this essay: Militant feminism, whose shock troops were necessary in their day, is now undermining the cause of equal rights. "Many women have come to see the feminist movement as anti-male, anti-child, anti-family, anti-feminine," writes the novelist Sally Quinn, ". . . often with overtones of lesbianism and man-hating." This article was published in 1992. I was pretty young in the early 90s and was witness to what I thought was just normal. The reason I bring this specific …
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:41 PM
7

Relevant username.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 12:51 PM
6

Grrihorih dxfh Is that you, HP Lovecraft?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:46 AM
7

Eh. I agree with Nihil. I mean, maybe not them pretending to be men, but the community is fairly saturated with 2X subscribers. I've said elsewhere that OneY is essentially where 2X tells their SOs to go so they can baby-sit them in a controlled environment. I pop in occassionally to offer a solid word of encouragement or criticism. Aside from those two things, I try not to waste my time there.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:43 AM
1

I was banned from OneY for calling them eunuchs. It's 5:00 AM and I went 'HAH' really loud in a very, very quiet office building. I feel awkward now.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:40 AM
2

transphobic is a bullshit term Tell that to R/TransphobiaProject. faggot is a derogatory (you spelled it wrong Good catch. faggots don't have to be gay, idiot Yes. They can equally be bundles of sticks or cigarettes. Considering what you're referring to isn't a flammable, inanimate object(s), you're using the word to mean 'a gay man' in attempts to insult someone. faggots are just that - faggots Stand up comedians don't determine the language or the definition of anything, regardless of how much…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:28 AM
1

Yes, I'm the one on an emotional rampage. How do you do bold as well as caps again? That was me making fun of you, bruddah. I can understand your desperation to turn your outburst back at me, though. It's alright. We all get a little emotional at times. Just reel it in some next time, k?
/r/MensRights23/05/11 05:22 PM
1

Next time have her arrested or expelled or both for sexual assault. Why next time? He has witnesses to the incident and still has a very solid case, I'd say.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:20 AM
5

You're either an obvious troll or a painfully toxic individual (though the two are often the same). I'm aiming for obvious troll. The conversation flow didn't even call for a question of the nature of the sexuality behind the MRM, but apparently he fit one in there somehow.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:16 AM
-4

You need to learn to read: I read it the first time, chum. You see that? No need to be a patronizing prat. Not basing my view on one fucking statement. Simmer down. No need to get caught up in your emotions because someone's critical of something you say. I'm hardly 'shitting all over the community'. .... I'd prefer it if forums like ours largely appeared to be places of debate and persuasion, and not some pokey little dive populated by society's sad, bitter rejects. Oh, no. You're not shitting …
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:47 AM
-4

Oh, look. A statement that's offcolor in a community of down-trodden folks, made by a female MRA. THEREFORE THE ENTIRE SUBREDDIT IS A HE-MAN WOMAN HATER'S CLUB. Seriously dude? You're gonna pick this one comment to say something, and this is the one you pick? I get your point that the comment is not exactly the message the MRM wants to broadcast, but you needn't shit on the whole community to make that point.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:20 AM
6

This guy seems familiar. What's funny is that he even qualified his accusation of 'faggot' by explaining what he meant beforehand.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:10 AM
5

idiot. you fucking faggot. And by faggot, I don't mean you're gay - I mean you're a fucking irrational pussywhipped pansy bitch with no balls. pussy. retard? you selfish twat. Idiot. I'm so glad we're conducting this discussion on a mature, adult level. Also: And by faggot, I don't mean you're gay - I mean you're a fucking irrational pussywhipped pansy bitch with no balls. Faggot is derogitory word used against gay men. So yes, you were calling him gay, and you apparently consider that an insult…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:07 AM
2

I did, for several reasons. Because of my intended career choice, it's hard for me to be vocal about something and be able to maintain job security. Also, my name revolves around a condition I have that I don't want to associate with my name, because only a handful of people know that I suffer from it.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 09:57 AM
2

In practice many/most of us are straight/bi/gay multi-race divorcees with children and were raised in feminist society and surroundings. The MRM fight is actually less personal for me than it is for most folks, I reckon. I've never been divorced or have suffered directly from most of the issues here(Aside from some male descrimination while hanging out with my kid). My dad, on the other hand, is the poster child for alimony and child support issues. I'm the youngest of 7 children. My dad had 3 c…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 09:26 AM
3

I'm always up for a good chat or debate, but I dislike open misrepresentations of positions or arguments. Whether or not it was deliberate, I've yet to determine, but it makes it hard to have a solid conversation with anyone if you don't know their offical stance on something(And vice versa, naturally.) I'm keeping my eye on it for now. My personal stance right now is R/MR is probably the best place on reddit for the MRM to grow. It has its hecklers(What movement doesn't, really?), it has dissen…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 05:44 PM
6

I think I saw something in one of the FAQs. I'll look for it and edit my post once I find it. I've seen some of our regulars(aetheralloy was the first to pop up in my head) defending that we're welcoming to the gay community and protect their interests as men. Almost every time I've seen someone say 'You guys are homophobes!', I've seen Aether link something, and say something along the lines of 'No we're not, here's why.' And yeah. I've read a good bit of some of the hate speech from feminists …
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:27 PM
4

Edit: In hindsight, my title choice was probably a bit counter productive to what I wanted to say here. Oh well. Looks like a feminist approved subbreddit, imo. They slam us a bit, and decide we're better off as 'related' subreddits while they share siblinghood with other subs. Sadface.:( I found out about it here. A few quotes from their mission statement: Men's Rights typically has been a reactionary movement towards feminism, often labeling feminism and sometimes even women as enemy #1. This …
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:13 PM
1

I think, given that name, you're more prone to being called/being believed to be a troll. I just look like a bad novelty account, most days. Troll if I argue a point people in the subreddit don't like. lol
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:06 PM
7

It's my understanding that journals are admissable as evidence(or a written testimony) but are still suspect to he-said/she-said. When the journals can be cross referenced with other evidence(recipets with dates, credit card statements, etc), it adds credibility to the character of the person who keeps it. Divorce court is like a character battle, they who are most responsible/trustworthy wins the prize of not being seperated from children.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:01 PM
0

The people who post that shit already think the worse of MRA's. We don't need to confirm the doubts of the women who yet believe these things in order to combat the insane ones that 'post that shit already.' It's important to re-frame the discussion. What you're suggesting here to combat it is poisonous to a movement this size. I agree with the need to re-frame the discussion, but saying things like "Yes, I am a misogynist' in attempts to challenge the definition of it and simultaneously support…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:33 PM
1

There is the hate crime accusation also based on gender (some would see it as female on male) It is, in a way. The reason for the outrage the attackers had is because the person who upset them was born a male, which apparently adds further insult to their 'injuries'. I seriously doubt the reaction would have been same if the transexual involved had instead be born and remained a woman. Now, on the flipside, had the transexual been born a man(and remained as such), and the attacker's boyfriend/hu…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:11 PM
-1

You know, you can be sarcastic without being retarded.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:45 PM
3

which is startlingly prevalent on this subreddit. Awesome, great, thanks. This subreddit needed a fresh coat of paint. Did you pick a broad brush to save time, or was it all that you had available? Anyway, great choice. Most men here don't have contempt for women, they have contempt for situations they or their brothers/fathers have been put in by feminists, who are by and large women. Anyone who actually goes out of their way to degrade or insult women, just as this kid has unwittingly done, ge…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:38 PM
1

Also, it might be worth adding (Xpost from ONEY) in there. They generally approve of OneY, over there.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:25 PM
1

Would that really be a problem for you patho? Not really, but I've spoken up enough over there for people to get the gist of my intentions being there. I'm not saying I can't do it, but I think it would be wasted if I did it, seeing how almost everything I post in 2X and OneY gets downvoted to hell anyway. I might make a throw away and post it If you do, open the title up with "It's refreshing to see men being insecure about their bodies too," otherwise, it'll reek of male agendayness.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:22 PM
3

... Why were you downvoted here?
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:19 PM
1

Now when ever I'm called out for being a misogynist by a feminist I agree. Don't. Seriously, don't even pay attention to it. You'll literally waste time running away from a witch hunt, where feminists will be glad to run you into oblivion. When politicians try to enact things like universal healthcare, idiots will ask them "DO YOU HATE FREEDOM, MR. SOCALIST?", if they were to sit there and try to defend their stance of not hating freedom, they'd be too wrapped up in that to support the original …
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:16 PM
1

Are you banned from 2x like me? Not yet, surprisingly. I think the only way I could get that by without outright saying "Man issue in 2x" is by saying "Look, men who finally are feeling like we do about our bodies." And by "We," I'd have to lie about being female.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:50 AM
3

Cripes, fellas. This was hard to read. It makes my stomach churn. How can she live thinking this way? She finds offense in practically everything and finds something wrong with every simple idea. There's no reason to be afraid of us. We're good and honest folk, even if we do support abortion rights? He has procured a prostitute. Somebody better tell Amsterdam. He watches pornography in which women are depicted. Are depicted.. as what? This one looks like there should be more here. And why just w…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:43 AM
3

Guys like all sorts of boobs, and women can count on most guys liking what they got. I think the important thing here is that breasts are aesthetic during sex, while a man's johnson is almost purely functional. That is, of course, unless you're talking about tit-fucking, in which case Mrs. AA cup won't be able to help much with that. A more apt comparason would be a large vagnia(and it somehow being a naturally loose orifice) to a small penis. Both risk not being satisfying enough to the partner…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:08 AM
2

I saw this yesterday when I was checking out OneY. Was surpised it didn't get here sooner. Great video. I (honestly) have a penis that's larger than what they're calling average, and there's always been that touch of insecurity revolving around it. While my wife's never complained, she's also never talked about it at all. I stick with my belief that she actually doesn't care, or isn't bothered by it enough to say anything. Still. When I heard this guy talking about his 3-incher(vs his American b…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:03 AM
1

Have you started talking to anyone about it? Seems like it would be an awesome thing to do, but if we're all silent, how would people know why we're there?
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:18 PM
2

And I hate to say it, but it shouldn't be a major crime unless you can prove that it was intentionally false. I agree. Did I sound like I was advocating for easier punishment of false accusers?
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:44 PM
3

Or not to convict anyone except on proof beyond reasonable doubt. And the right to cross-examine your accuser. These sound good. The first one there sounds a little classist. Someone else mentioned SAVE and NCFM. When I have a few moments, I'll check to see if they have anything going for demonstrations.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:40 PM
1

SoCal? Cripes. I'm on th east coast.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:20 PM
1

Oh, right. Now THat's sounding familiar. I kept calling her Mary Kieler in my head. Cripes.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:16 PM
1

after we get rid of Kellet, Wait. Who's/What's that?
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:01 PM
1

Anything I can do outside of the internet, really. While I'm good for talking on the internet and spreading the word digitally, I'd like a chance to connect with people face to face as we work towards our goals. Thanks for the info, I'll google those ancronyms and seek 'em out.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:57 PM
3

A slut uses her sexual power (her own sexual objectification) to stomp all over men. To dangle the goods in their faces, then sneer, "Like you'd ever have a chance at someone hot like me, loser." To get as much male attention as she can, then be offended and feel violated when guys she wouldn't fuck dare to look at her or hit on her. I think you've just accurately described what 80s and 90s songs refer to as 'Man Eaters'.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:31 PM
3

I hear this argument Honestly, I just wanted to see if there was anything I could get involved in. It wasn't my intent to discredit MRM. :P Sorry if it sounded that way.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:22 PM
5

Actually, that's extremely on topic. lol
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:22 PM
1

One, the harsher the punishment, the less likely the conviction. The conviction rate wouldn't change, the amount of people attempting to convict others will decline. Second, the second we start jailing people for false rape claims the question arises, what if we got it wrong? ... Pushing forward for prosecution when there is no evidence is what's happening to the falsely accused now. Flipping it back would be both morally wrong, and hypocritical. Currently, False rape claim consequences don't ex…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:13 PM
5

Perjury and obstruction of justice and there should be lawsuits to cover emotional distress, loss of employement and credibility, defamation and slander(And/or libel, depending on the circumstances),. I urge our brothers not to campaign for a single crime for people who falsely accuse people of crimes. Their crimes, in truth, are numerous and compounding in damage and scale.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:06 PM
1

TL;DR: Illiterate internet tough-guy trolling.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:34 PM
1

As a friendly suggestion, I recommend not mentioning you brought this up in R/MR, and don't identify with the MRM when you do it. Your personal stance(if you have one) will get you obliterated in most places in this little gender war.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:02 PM
2

I was met with nothing more than hostility and ignorance. Yeah. It's a struggle that the MRM faces constantly. The thing that differentiates us from feminism is that hostility and ignorance of us is accepted and even depicted as 'righteous', while the opposite is never true and is considered abhorrent. The particular instance(The finger and the grass) is a grey subject. They were already having sex, then finger penetration came up after the fact. People who sympathize with the woman will see 'Yo…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:51 PM
0

It's not your fault. You just stepped on a nail someone left in the yard a few decades ago, that's all. lol
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:34 PM
1

not shock folks off. If anything, you brought more people here. That's generally what these sub vs sub things do. Some of these folks have been here before from previous 'invasions' and won't likely agree with anything MRAs have to say anyway. It's better to appeal to those who aren't so blindly dedicated to their belief set. They're better to talk to, anyway.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:28 PM
2

sociopathy? I'm only upset because sociopaths are a bit of a sensitive subject for me. Unmedicated, it's hard to tell me from a sociopath. No, she's not a sociopath. She may be less than understanding to your concerns, but that doesn't make her a sociopath. Any human sciences tend to make you better at managing whatever it is they focus around. Ever seen a fat dietician, or a dentist with bad teeth? Someone who studies sociology is better at understanding human emotions, triggers, and responses,…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:25 PM
2

Seems like a pointless attack just to further your argument. Semantics(it's not pointless if it has an intended function, regardless of how poor of a reason,) aside, we need to communicate our efforts to combat misandry and support the rights of men, and the results of such efforts.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:09 PM
2

I don't care either, but one of the core problems we deal with in the MRM is male abuse and general misandry, and that feminists support it rather openly. It's important to note that the efforts of MRAs to protect themselves and all men from misandry are swept away, censored, and otherwise stomped out. That's why it's relevant.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:05 PM
2

When idiots are happy to trim the branches of injustice, Kloo is happier to upheave the whole tree. Well spoken.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:54 PM
1

a very well trained troll From a previous conversation I had with her, she's claims to be a sociology major. So yeah. Possibly.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:43 PM
2

MR Folk Why is it that sub vs sub drama always seems to break out when people make the distinction that they're posting in R/MR in their title? It's like foreshadowing in an already obvious story.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:35 PM
7

I"m interested in how I am illiterate though. Here you go: A fag in every sense of the word. His mom is obviously a fag fag Noun A cigarette. A male homosexual. Mother a. A female person who is pregnant with or gives birth to a child. b. A female person whose egg unites with a sperm, resulting in the >>conception of a child. c. A woman who adopts a child. d. A woman who raises a child. you just are a sensitive prick and uncomfortable with you're feelings. if that's what your suggesting I'm incap…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:44 PM
8

you just are a sensitive prick and uncomfortable with you're feelings. And you're an illiterate prat who needs to hijack comments to troll.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:33 PM
2

A fag in every sense of the word. Jesus Christ, man. Really? Hijacking a comment to just spout irrelevant slurs? There's no need for that crap, and it sure isn't welcome. Enjoy your downvote.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:12 PM
1

Honest question: Have you read "The Game?" I haven't read it, myself. Being a married man who's not particularly interested in looking for a change nor a man lacking in confidence, I haven't seen much of a personal reason to. From my understanding, the book talks about 'tricks and gimmicks' to picking up or manipulating women, but it also covers the basics of what people find attractive in men. I can look at a woman and tell why a man would be attracted to her(nice rack, pretty face, nice ass, s…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:02 PM
2

Sometimes people have opened doors for me, pulled out chairs, and so on. That's being decent. Treating her(You, assuming the admission of your gender) 'like a lady' would have been me giving you roses at the start of every date, forcing myself to do and say things I wouldn't normally do in order to gain your favor. If you had known me for, say 2 or 3 years, you might find that sweet and endearing, but taking kind of action on every date with every woman, and denying yourself the right to be your…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:08 AM
2

If you're not treating all humans decently - which is the word I used, along with 'well' - you're kind of a shitty human. Then our disagreement isn't about how their being treated, but your defitinion of being 'treated like a lady.' When men aim to 'treat them like ladies,' they go out of their way to make these people happy simply because of their gender and attraction. Judging from your lack of understanding around it, I assume you've never been in that situation before(receiving or giving end…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:55 AM
2

curiously precluding the notion that one can't have sex with a woman and treat her well. I refer back to this: Hint: Not all male advice is out to shit on women, A) Treating her 'like a lady' is not 'treating her well.' Don't know about you, but I'd rather not be treated like a stud when the option of being a person is available. B) Who the hell said they're exclusive? The advice given was saying that women enjoy sex more than the gimmicks to earn their favor. No one has said 'Fuck what women th…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:42 AM
3

Cripes, you're a pretentious ass with nothing helpful to say. Saying "You must find your own way!" when someone says "Hey, how can I do X" is like saying "Figure it out yourself, asshole." He wouldn't be asking if he thought he was capable of doing it on his own. Edit: Protip from one writer to another: Michael Steane, author of Reunion Island: The Last Colony, available on Amazon Kindle No one cares who you are as a writer until you're famous. No one cares what you've written unless its relevan…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:21 AM
8

and there's also the terminology of 'shove' - put would be more apt. Not every girl prefers it rough! You're offended by the word shove because it some how implies rough sex? You try sticking your dick in a chick without pushing. See how well that works out. Christ, we're in the age of the hyper-politically correct.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:17 AM
6

Maybe some women do. Please don't generalise all women. It's just as bad as generalising all men. Absolutely. Some women are homosexuals. Make sure you're not in a lesbian bar doing this, fellas. Not only is it a colossal waste of time, but you might actually offend someone with your masculinity.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:13 AM
4

I think the point is that sex, where a woman can let loose and be herself, is more enjoyable than a barrage of petty gifts of roses and perfumes and chairs pulled out. Hint: Not all male advice is out to shit on women, and 'The Game' isn't about how to treat all women, it's about how to attract women that interest you in a sexual way.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:09 AM
3

While I've disagreed with you for other things that you've said and asked for, I doubt anyone here has said what you've just said better than you have.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:44 AM
8

As much as I hate to see any man, regardless of his status, in this situation, I REALLY hope he becomes the example that opens the eyes of people about the damage of false rape claims and accusations.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:31 PM
6

Lady Hale said that according to the dictionary, violence means physical attack, but can also apply to extreme fervour, passion or fury. TIL: Non-Violent Protests actually were violent, because they had fervour, passion, and fury. This makes me sick. Lets criminalize everything! Leave no man unshackled!
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:27 PM
3

extreme irrationality We're scared of the world we're in. When we try to stand up for ourselves as individuals, it's passived off as 'typical male assertion.' When the brothers of the mrm stand up for each other, we're the patriachary. We can't fight it by ourselves. We can't fight it with our brothers. What choices do we have outside of running away, avoiding the problem, and waiting for external support? We need to keep fighting for justice, but there's quite a lot on the line for a man, and v…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:05 PM
5

As much as this kind of stuff scares me, I would hope the good folks in 2X would kick some sense into the scarier folks over there. I've stopped reading 2X for a while, so I can't gauge what their response would be.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:50 PM
4

Why do you say that we're just a bunch of haters? I don't like what you said, but I certainly don't hate you or anyone for it. We're mad about being mistreated, sure. Some of us can get colorful about it, but we're not hateful. When you say these sorts of things about us, it hurts our feelings and only contributes to this rumor of us being raging impulsive savages. Please stop. :(
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:42 PM
5

Your response would be a lot more credible if you didn't tout the screen name of a pathological liar. ;) Probably. But there's no sense about lying(hur) about what I am. I have a few diseases(Which I'm now medicated for) that made me a pathological liar. I have another name on reddit, which I don't like to associate with my diseases. I also do some robin-hood trolling with it, but not in R/MR. And... I am curious how this particular submission would go over in 2X. How many would be cheering her …
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:32 PM
3

I think it's damaged, but I doubt it'll be destroyed. The timespan of which this is happening is relatively quick. Still incredibly fucked up, though. Edit: Strauss-Kahn, a center-left former finance minister whom polls had tipped as the likely frontrunner to win France's 2012 presidential election, will appear in court on Monday. The case has sent shockwaves around the world. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a deliberate smear attempt by some interested party.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:25 PM
2

Cripes, this is terrifying. Even if it is a joke, they're talking about reasonings and grounds on which other men have been sued.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:20 PM
5

Would anyone think less of me if I said I was frightened by this message? I don't understand why anyone can have such blind hatred to me. I'd certainly never rape or abuse her, so why is she accusing me of raping/assisting in rape/dreaming of raping someone? This post makes me scared, guys, and not at all comfortable.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:13 AM
3

Add a qualifier "This is the argument I'm trying to refute:" at the top. It might make it seem less like you're saying it, rather than you aiming to smack that down. I didn't downvote you, but as soon as I read it, I was thinking 'You know, if I had tried this, I would've added that.'
/r/MensRights15/05/11 05:49 PM
3

I'll take the opportunity to pelt them with a bag full of rotten tomatoes I would grow and spoil that sack of fruit/vegitables for you, sir.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 05:35 PM
4

'Innocent until proven guilty.' generally implies that unless they're guilty, they're innocent. If they can't be proven guilty, the opposite must be assumed as true. That's what it's supposed to do, anyway.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 03:00 PM
26

It's a shame to see such a good man brought down by a thoughtless pre-teen. If anything, this proves how eager folks are to see a man destroyed for being a criminal that they'll criminalize even decent men on little grounds other than his satisfaction with working with children. My heart aches for this poor guy. Nothing worse than discovering a dream, achieving a dream, and then having it ripped from you, along with your reputation. Career, reputation. The only thing this man has left is sports …
/r/MensRights15/05/11 02:00 PM
4

I used to be pro-choice, until I understood that women want "control" over their own bodies as well as the bodies (wealth) of every man who enters their vagina. Do I need to point out that it sounds odd that you're anti-abortion when abortion would absolve men of the very theft you're concerned about? I don't think its a good thing to deny women the right to abort for the same reason I disagree with how the society villifies all men. You shouldn't punish the whole for the actions of a few. Grant…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 01:34 PM
0

Didn't you know? We men are supposed to cater to everyone, despite already having tons of responsibilities and occupational hazards. /s
/r/MensRights15/05/11 12:15 PM
5

Glad to see that the charges were dropped. I wish he would/could sue for defamation and emotional distress, but I can't say I blame him for wanting to just plain distance himself at this point.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 11:13 AM
3

That's pretty much the sentiment when this issue first came up a while back. Though I agree, the circumstances looked bad, but luck shouldn't be involved when it comes to justice. :/
/r/MensRights15/05/11 11:11 AM
1

This kind of crap makes me sick. I mean, anyone doing this would make me sick to my stomach. The sociopath inside of me has always wondered what would happen if you stuck a living thing in a microwave, but the medicated me says "Jesus fucking christ, what the hell is wrong with you and these people?"
/r/MensRights15/05/11 11:04 AM
1

I'm sorry you weren't born in the 1950's when you could have been pushing in the right direction for equality. That's what gamers and most 20-somethings would call 'ownage.' ... Yeah. I thought I had more to contribute to the dicussion, but I don't.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 11:01 AM
7

I don't see many victories for men and the MRM. Here's one I recently discovered, for those of you who haven't seen this yet. Don't lose hope, brothers. Here's a quick snippet: In March 2001, it was revealed that British Airways had a policy of not seating adult male passengers next to unaccompanied children, even if the child's parents are elsewhere on the plane. This led to accusations that the airline considered all men to be potential paedophiles and women to be incapable of such abuse. The …
/r/MensRights15/05/11 10:56 AM
2

She says feminist vegetarian when she talks like a vegan. Generally, I don't care so much about animals for anything other than scientific, research or plain interests of curiosity. I'd rather not kill them, and I think it's fucked up that dogs are getting raped(wtf?), but I'm seriously not going to waste time by seeking out vengence and rights for animals, or get pissy at someone because they happened to give a cat a quick boot in the ass. Truth is, people are ready to get angry about damn near…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 02:49 PM
4

The only thing I'm unsure of is if it is anti-male or anti-trans. It is certainly one or both though. If you're refering to the factcheckme blogpost thing, the text and subtext says Femonade: a nice cool sip of misandry on a hot day. ... in the top right corner. It's hard to see because the site is poorly designed. This article was written with the intention of generating shock value amongst MRMs. Even radical fems aren't as openly anti-male as this blogger. Okay, maybe some of them are. But sti…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 01:44 PM
1

I know what we should do! We should egg their wikipages. I mean, seriously. Get a picture of a splattered egg and spam edit it in everywhere as examples.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 01:27 PM
1

The fact that it's cliche already implies that it's not your writing. At least in terms of it being something original you've done.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 01:23 PM
1

Oh, and have a look at the history of the MR entry, it's quite interesting ... Dear god.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:41 AM
1

Show me a man and I will show you a potential killer, a potential rapist. Rape has become a weapon of war. Warring groups use rape because it destroys communities. Great. Not only are we all killers and rapists.. r/mensrights ... comment my might have been a bit complex for you to grasp. We're also simpletons. I feel like I'm being treated like an animal here. It doesn't feel good. In the context, you probably mean human and not man. I blame your cliched writing. Edit: Also FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:40 AM
2

never bothered to give him a proper a haircut. I laughed so hard at this. I don't even know why. How did you get from placating to women to raised by a poor hairdresser?
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:19 AM
1

Saw this post and started wondering where some of these folks who are critical of the MRM get their info from. The Men's Right's wikipedia entry. With all of the materials that seems to flow through R/MR, I find it surprising to see [citation needed] on anything here. Some of the issues listed here are written either with little detail or hardly touched upon at all.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:53 AM
1

He was out argued before he started arguing, becaues the first thing he did was insult you. It's pretty hilarious, really.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 09:25 AM
1

Don't know, really. Yeah. I'm speaking honestly. I just don't find it arousing.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 08:00 AM
2

which is the lunar phase in which he was born. wut?
/r/MensRights11/05/11 11:01 PM
1

Admittedly, I said a few pretty nasty remarks. Nothing extreme like some folks did(IE: Death threats), but they were pretty ignorant things. I've gone there to try to learn more, but I ran into some folks that saw those comments, so they've been naturally less than enthusiastic about receiving me. Some of the folks have been really understanding. Others, not so much. Criticism over there isn't taken very well by everyone(Two of the mods I've talked to have been great, one of them, not so much), …
/r/MensRights11/05/11 05:40 PM
1

Point successfully refuted. You win, sir. Cripes.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 05:20 PM
3

I've been busy over in R/TPP, honestly. It's a goddamned circlejerking warzone over there, man. Have you seen it? http://www.reddit.com/r/TransphobiaProject/comments/h8q9b/hey_rmensrights_i_got_something_to_tell_you/ I've literally been downvoted on almost everything I've said. Even in their defense/support.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 02:55 PM
3

Lately, R/MR has grown increasingly more OneY-sih in the aspect that it just talks about 'man interests stuff' rather than 'rights of men.'
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:56 PM
1

Hmm... haven't you ever thought 'if one girl is good, two is better'? Of course. Actually, maybe it's softcore vs hardcore porn that's the key. I wouldn't mind seeing another girl strap one on and plow another chick. I'm not personally into cunnilingus, and masturbation/handjobs are just boring to me.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:54 PM
1

Oh, sorry. I thought I was disagreeing with you by saying it's worth bringing up. I thought you didn't think it was worth mentioning. My mistake.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:39 PM
1

Hah. I see what you did there. You made a joke about fellatio, because male genitalia is involved. Good one. /sarcasm.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:24 PM
2

I really don't understand the appeal of lesbian porn. I get a feeling I'm missing something important every time someone mentions it.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:17 PM
2

Eh. I don't either. I mean, all things considered, this is a fairly petty decision to censor the genitalia. People who don't want to see things like that won't go to the musem in the first place, like you indicated. It's still something worth bringing up, because it is a sign, albiet a petty sign, of sexism and male repulsion.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:15 PM
2

I think it's safe to assume that it wasn't covered. The article wouldn't differentiate male genitalia and female genitalia if they were both covered.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:13 PM
3

Depressing at best. Cripes. How wide spread is this across the nation? Or is California the only one that's doing this? I thought I had heard elsewhere of other states doing it, but I can't recall the articles.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:10 PM
1

Great idea. So, we're using dark blue?
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:06 PM
3

These were Apple Computers they were stealing. Not jewelry, TVs and stereo systems. They're clearly asian or caucasian men. Maybe even italians. Does Ohio have a mafia/mob representation? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:37 PM
7

Yeah. Blunt force trauma, murder and hiding the body: Always a good laugh. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:30 PM
3

It's Fox News, not much of it makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:22 PM
2

When marketing plays on insecurities and tells people they need a product they don't? Yeah, I have a problem with that. Good for you, but you're not in a position where you have any right to tell people what they can and can't use on their bodies. Look at all the products marketed to men to enlarge their penises. If a man wants a bigger penis, that's cool. But the pervasive message is that you can't please a woman without a larger than average penis--and I can tell you from experience that is si…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:50 PM
1

Hey, look. Another subreddit that doesn't allow downvotes.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:34 PM
0

I think you misunderstand. I understood what you said. I'm warning you that using words in a sequence like that will likely drive a negative response.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:28 PM
-1

I think that's an overly simplistic view of things, as well. This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor medical community not only agrees these products are not beneficial, but actually harmful, then the need itself is perpetuated by the marketing Tell that to cigarette companies. And it's a doctor's place to overwrite your preference to peresonal hygene? People are free to do whatever they want with their bodies, and companies are free to create products that they can market to people who…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:26 PM
-4

Would women have reason to douche or use "freshening wipes" if the marketing for those products didn't tell them it was a problem that needed fixing? You have a clear misunderstanding of why things are made. 'Big bad marketers' build upon an already established idea. They all do. The reason anything is made is because someone, at some point in time, thought it was a problem. People wouldn't buy/use if they didn't agree with the notion that it's something worth using.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:14 PM
0

must be dealt with I'd caution you on using this type of language here. Trying to tell R/MR to 'Just deal with it' almost insures fervorish response.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:08 PM
0

I think they're targeting specific members of R/MR. I've seen some relatively harmless comments downvoted into oblivion. Apparently, I said elsewhere some relatively critical things revolving around transgenders. My viewpoint regarding the entire matter isn't exactly twenty-something friendly. Downvoters gonna downvote.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:37 PM
1

Rephrased: The phrase "Picking up the check" is a simple way of expressing the provider mindset that men have, and I think it doesn't express it well enough. The provider mindset is the source of a lot of male-centric problems. And I'm not sure why I was downvoted. It might have something to do with the fact that I made a relatively critical remark elsewhere, or maybe I just failed in expressing what I wanted to say. Regardless, downvoters gonna downvote.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:33 PM
-4

There's an MRM outside of reddit. Actually, I better go double check to make sure it doesn't exist only online.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:22 AM
2

I think that MRs need to embrace the LGBT community. We do. At least 60% of it.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:15 AM
-12

Though I don't exactly expect a warm, or even respectful, welcome. Hello there! Welcome to R/MensRights. I hope you have a pleasant stay. This might be a good place to introduce you to your enemy. Only a fool finds opposing intellects as an enemy. There is only something to gain from argument, whether its confidence in your belief or realization that you've been wrong. Moving on. Science seems to be settling on the idea that, when I was in the womb, my mother's body was supposed to generate a su…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:05 AM
-6

Damn, dude. The downvote brigades are hitting you hard today. Me too, apparently.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:45 AM
-7

Nah. You just need to realize life exists outside of reddit.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:43 AM
-8

It's a shame that such a large chunk of MRM's fight has to be dedicated to what people casually refer to 'picking up the check.' It's an unfortunate trivialization of the bacon-bringer mindset.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:29 PM
3

It might have something to do with the fact that MIP is suggesting that the only thing that drives our desire to live are women that agree with us. No idea overall, though.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:24 PM
-7

I think I've heard that laugh before over the same matter.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:15 PM
9

Normally, I'd stand up for anything that increases responsibilities as a parent for women, but the Republican idea that cutting funding to abortion screams of distraction. Crying abortion wastes money in an irresponsible way is like complaining about the cat pissing on a rug when the entire house is on fire. And considering the republican track record of trying to outlaw abortion, I don't think it's that far out of the scope to say that they're specifically trying to revoke abortion rights and t…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 07:52 PM
-3

Still stands to reason that there's a mental condition somewhere underneath the desire to sexually mutilate yourself. If believing in their argument that their desire to be a different gender is natural makes me a hypocrite, then guilty as charged. Doesn't change the fact that they're damaged. Though it might be more accurate to call me anti-mental, or whatever the word is for it.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 07:19 PM
-9

Honest question: Is it appropriate or inappropriate to ask a tranny if they can fuck themselves? Because there's quite a bit of them in that subreddit I'd probably say 'Go fuck yourself' to.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:33 PM
-6

Honest question: Is it appropriate or inappropriate to ask a tranny if they can fuck themselves? Because there's quite a bit of them in that subreddit I'd probably say 'Go fuck yourself' to.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:31 PM
-2

Would I stick it in a woman? Probably. Would I stick it in that same woman if I found out she used to be a he? Not a chance in hell. Why? Reason 1: DSDIC. If he wasn't comfortable enough with himself to the degree that he needed to undergo surgery and hormone replacement, imagine what else is going on in that head. Yes, I think there's something to be concerned about by someone who would willingly castrate themselves. This follows the rule of 'Don't stick dick in crazy.' Reason 2: Naturally natu…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:18 PM
1

Hey, don't blame me. I was at first, then I read it and realized that you just copied the title. That's why I dissappoint-faced the article. It's a good read, though, now that I've had time to read it.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 03:45 PM
1

criticism=help. Wait. You're a photographer? You should know that criticism == help from first hand experience. Unless you were never peer reviewed, and just picked up a camera one day and said 'Hey, look. I'm a photographer.' Given your attitude in this post, I'd wager you found a nice point-and-shoot and called it a day.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 03:44 PM
2

Obviously, you're not a professional anything. Act like a professional and you'll be treated like a professional. Act like a douchebag, get treated like a douchebag. It's in your best interest, and their best interest, to pay them for their work.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 03:38 PM
2

ALL CAPS TITLE HURTS MY SENSIBILITIES.... Opens the PDF and looks at the title. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights05/05/11 04:54 PM
3

Interesting that there are few reports or little discussion in this article of women raping women or women raping men and/or boys (under 18). This article was posted fresh out of the 80s and the early 90s. This is the same generation that finds RoboCop shooting a man in the junk for trying to rape a woman hilarious justice.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:42 PM
2

When they, the gf and his parents, went to the house to tell them that it had been worked out they found him haning in a closet with a bag over his head. I guess he learned something from the experience, so did I and many others in that peer group. Yep. Even during the zombie apocolypse, being betrayed like this by someone to only have them criminalize you would make most folks want to kill themselves. Not only was this guy defamed by the accusation of rape, he was made to feel like his consentu…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:40 PM
6

TL;DR Aritsts work for me for free, because I can give you empty promises of exposure while you contribute to my career and goals. I dunno, seems like a pretty good opportunity for an up-n-comer to leapfrog some competition. If you agree, email me at menzmagazine's gmail account. This severely lowers my opinion of you and this magazine. Exploitation of artists, visual or otherwise, is a crime worthy of shaming. Pay the damn artists.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 12:12 PM
1

So... by responding with a personal attack, you're a better person than me? Yep. Between the two of us, I'm the only one not lying to myself. Dude, I'd put my life on the line to defend your religion, no matter how much I disagreed with it, so long as you weren't hurting others; I've risked my life for others before, and I don't regret it. I'm simply quoting statistics there. I didn't make them up; if you'd paid attention, I've been criticizing Atheism this entire thread. This proves my point th…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 06:04 PM
2

There does seem to be a 10 point IQ difference What they have in IQ they lack in humility. And by 'they', I strictly mean 'you.'
/r/MensRights28/04/11 11:18 AM
5

I'm actually confused as to why this is considered a Men's Rights issue. I'm not saying it isn't, I just can't understand why it is. The men on that list might be innocent or might be guilty. It's certainly an act of defemation, but they're not descriminated against because they're men. They're descriminated against because they're clergy members and religious, as far as I can tell. This is made even more obvious by the fact that the blogger is an atheist and talks specifically about the crimes …
/r/MensRights28/04/11 11:09 AM
4

I don't expect you to understand all of what I do, and what I stand for, all in one sitting. There's too much to think about, and too many departures from what you've been taught all your life, for things to be that easy. You know, I generally don't like articles, or anything really, that starts out saying 'I don't expect you to understand...' And then breaks out into a relatively long article detailing his/her opinions. Seriously. It's like you're trying to insult your audience by saying they'r…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:53 AM
1

A bit. Grammatically, the subject is ambigious when you said.. Its kind of naive. Because the preceeding sentence said.. I get your point man The subject being 'point', with 'your' being the posessive modifier, I can only assume that the sentence following it carries over the subject.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:50 AM
3

As a man, a fish, and a mental patient, I resent this comment.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:14 AM
2

HAH. No, it's 2-- Wait. You said 22? Son of a..
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:09 AM
1

What about that comment was naive, exactly? That OneY, a branch of 2X, is feminist? The fact that I think your reasons for doing it are wrong?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:08 AM
3

Everything has a mathematical truth... Here's a fun one for you: When is it appropriate for an answer other than 4 to be derived from putting 2 and 2 together?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:14 PM
1

ONE SMALL VICTORY FOR MAN.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 04:08 PM
1

ONE SMALL VICTORY FOR MAN.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 04:07 PM
1

I expected this to be an article regarding Duke Nuke'em. I was very disappointed when I found out it wasn't an article about Duke Nuke'em.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 04:01 PM
6

I wouldn't say assholes, but I'd quote my great grandfather on this one. "The only drunk things I take home are myself and my dogs."
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:52 PM
3

... Actually, I'd die laughing if one of the feminists in that community responded to his request for sandwich making with that. Like seriously. I'd dig a hole, buy a coffin, get in it, and laugh myself to death.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:30 PM
8

Is it a problem that I answered your question with a question?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:28 PM
10

Mebbe.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 10:59 AM
35

I'd be lying if I said I didn't laugh at it. It'd be even funnier if he had the gall to do it in person.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 10:16 AM
-2

OneY is a decidedly feminist community. You're right to suggest we post R/MR comics there, but for the wrong reasons.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:26 AM
1

I'll disagree and say that comics are constructive. Here's why: Political cartoons had a lot of impact in the past. They take complicated issues and make them seem more tangible and real. People here wanting 'serious' discussion, while right in desiring it, need to get over themselves. If you have an opinion, use a self post rather than a comic. Comics just don't generate discussion the same way written word does. And here I will disagree again. An edgey comic can spark a controversey/conversati…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:24 AM
5

Of "LGBT", 3 of those letters can fall into MensRights. One of them always does. One of them may or may not apply 50% of the time. The last one applies to both gender cults. Hate crimes against transgenders falls into open civil rights territory. Feminism and MensRights(for being a woman, for being a man who decided to be a woman respectfully) both have a stake in cases involving changed genders.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:07 AM
6

There's more than just that. The manager of the MCDonald's supposedly said that the 'employee who videotaped it is fire.' Dude. I want to be fire so bad. Air would be cool, too.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:40 PM
4

God damn. What the fuck do they teach teen agers these days that gets them to fight like that? Corner, throw down, drag, and have a buddy to help. I've seen gang violence more gentle than that. Crazy broad runs up out of NOWHERE and just starts wailing on the already cornered woman. The only thing she can do in her defense is curl up into a ball.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:36 PM
1

I don't think men should start emulating that complaint, do you? Sure. Why not? It clearly worked for feminists. They still have balloons full of sexism paint ready to lob at the wall that is society.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:34 PM
1

Oh hell no. This is the same country that had vending machines that sell women's panties. I can't think of anything that would be gasoline to feminism's fire than companies that tell feminists that their skidmarks and womanly odors are desired. It's effectively saying 'Your shit is awesome.' I don't have an answer to feminism. That's a fight for a man and woman wiser than I am.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:30 PM
2

The child is equally entitled, or ought to be equally entitled, to a paycheck from the mother if the father ends up with custody. This might mean something if the grand majority of divorce cases didn't end up with the woman taking the child based on sexism rather than any real ability to take care of the child finanically.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:56 PM
0

Everything that's in caps. Seriously. This how I read it: e, we do...it's called '... ) ) hat's so hard about that to understand?
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:50 PM
1

In that maid game I saw, the primary goal(Or game objective) was to teach them all how to perform maid duties and generally please their employers. The obvious reasons why anyone would play such a meaningless game would either be for the Harvest Moon-esque "grind", or the fact that there's copious amounts of fan service coupled with interactive dating simulators where you're always Rico Suave meets Hugh Hefner.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:38 PM
2

Nah. We satisfy our persecution complexes by putting rats on trial, then crucifying them using a rivet gun on a steel cross. Great hobby. Makes the taxidermists happy, too. Nice guess, though.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:33 PM
2

Highlights: His colleagues said Easton will make a difference in the topic of his in-depth research. And UI Professor Carol Coohey said she thinks Easton's work will encourage others to follow in his footsteps. This is good news for men. If they do follow in his footsteps, we might see more awareness about men's issues coming to light instead of twitching in some dark corner.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:34 PM
5

I nearly threw up. Seriously, this made me so sick to read I had to pull my trash can out from beside my desk and hold it between my legs fora bout 10 minutes. Men shouldn't felt descriminated against, because all you're trying to accomplish is the protection of women? The ends do not justify the means. If you want to protect people, start with educating people with relationship and social management, and sex education. Don't lob this grenade of a legislature at men. I seriously hope that stays …
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:06 PM
3

I did. Many times. Many, many times. Well, the maid one, at least. The Princess one I never bothered to buy, because it was the same game, and only one girl. THe maid one had 3 different flavors of girl.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:41 PM
1

.. Does the article actually say that they forced him to have sex with them? I started reading it, then realized I was on Fox news and immediately got off of it. Sexual battery could just refer to blunt force(IE: A kick or series of kicks) to his genitals.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:55 PM
7

Also: Fuck them for even suggesting that Duke Nukem Forever shouldn't exist. I've been waiting like 15 years for that damn game. When we can address the deep-seated issues that plague and polarize the mainstream gaming community, then we can talk about the threat of AddictingGames.com — and why, suddenly, there are opportunities for anti-male baubles to make a profit. The only thing that polarizes 'mainstream gaming communities' are console wars, and everyone secretly knows that it's a joke at t…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:49 PM
3

What came to mind as soon as I saw this is the enormous number of hentai games Japan produces. About 10 years ago, I saw a 'maid trainer' and 'princess trainer' game, where you'd teach them how to do (insert womanlything to do) while also having sex with them on a nightly basis. I only played the maid one, until I found cheatcodes to get to all of the good bits.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:46 PM
1

It's a semeningly impossible urge, isn't it?
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:41 PM
1

Thankfully, I'm here studying a technical field, so I spend most of my time with more level-headed individuals, You just haven't gotten far enough into it to meet the crazy ones yet.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:35 PM
5

I was in a horrible relationship with a compulsive liar for around 9 months. ... Is that you, Steve? I'm sorry for everything. On a serious note, because it brings up something that I and your ex share. Compulsive/pathological liars, depending on how long their condition has developed, are exceptionally good at manipulating people. Some of us are better at it than others, and most of us that have lived/gotten away with it longer are more likely to get away with it longer. When pathological liars…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 01:04 PM
3

"What's the most disgustingly bigoted load of ignorance a human being could possibly shit out? I'll post that!" No, that's what I do. She just goes around telling it like it is. Or in this case, like it would be.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:45 PM
3

Biologically speaking, women naturally have more control of the life of the child while its part of her body. Men, in a legal sense, generally don't have a say in much between 1 second to 9 months, because anything that impacts the child can also impact the mother, which violates their rights(Giving someone else power over their body.) So, women (are supposed to) have ultimate right over their body. Men should have the right to abandon fatherhood and withold support, but the only way to do that …
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:26 PM
2

A good debater isn't defined by how well thought his argument is. A good debater is defined by how many people he can convince of the batshit insane.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:06 PM
5

Holy jump-jiving Jesus on a jolly jackolantern, that's jacked up. Should we just buy some island somewhere and move all the men there, then built 14 foot walls around it? Every month, a woman is going to have an enire week's worth of 'viable defense' for murdering us. :( When he refused to sign certain documents, she apparently called the man a "parasite" and told him "she was going to wipe him off the earth." (Paragraph split) She left, but returned four hours later, chased her husband in her v…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 11:57 AM
-1

and there are ways to find arguments and spin it into something reasonable sounding, except especially religion. Religions have reaaaaally good debaters.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 11:52 AM
1

I ususally sandwich my MR with Lolcats. Some Lolcat before, slice of 2X, slab of MR, some soy OneY spread, lolcats at the end, served with a r/gaming pickle and a bag of r/politics chips.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 11:43 AM
17

With flashing eyes she [Rosenberg] shouted: You are a man, I'm a woman, and therefore shut up! This is the end to just about every conversation I've had with a female feminist regarding MR issues.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 09:32 AM
8

Pi is clearly 6, you emotional identity obsessed ninny. Gender sensitivity is pretty far out there, yo.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 09:26 AM
2

Saw something like that in the monthly 'What lie did your parents tell you' thing on AskReddit earlier. Shit like this is beyond depressing.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:26 PM
3

There was a newish song by Maroon 5 that is pretty much nothing but a guy getting beaten to shit by a very attractive woman. The song is called "Misery." It's pretty out there, though. Like, at some point, she pulls a rocket launcher, winks, and then shoots a dude with it. I'll admit that I laughed at it, because who doesn't enjoy watching random people get blown up with rocket launchers. It's obviously being used for comedy effect, though I doubt anyone would see the humor in it if the genders …
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:17 PM
2

It's probably safer to say that men who were previously employed who are no longer employed have no self respect, seeing how they're the intended topic of the article, not men who picked the lifestyle. Not sure if there are any studies out there about it, though. Having personally gone through the unemployment line, I can say that, at the very least, I had little self respect. I was unemployed for a year, at the end of my rope with a wife and a kid struggling to get by. Hurts bad, man.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:53 PM
3

Yes, but this is a conversation between us. Like I said earlier, whether or not feminism or women cause the issue impacting men is something that's left open to preception. If you want to be combative with astroturfers or clueless MRAs, go talk to them. Otherwise, keep your insults to your self. And food quality can be a men's rights/feminist issue if men and/or women are forced to eat a specific quality of food, or of the foods use products that damage the development of men/women. Otherwise, t…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:37 PM
2

See, now I take offense, sir. I'd go as far as to say that you're the blind one. I haven't once said it was a man vs woman issue. I've said it's a problem men are running into that society and hiring practices. I didn't say women put them there, neither does the article. The article does mention that women are doing better, but it doesn't say it's because of a feminist agenda. If you're refering to this: Employment in the country HAS been a gender issue for a while. There isn't a day that goes b…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:28 PM
7

The subreddit is about Mens Rights, whether or not feminism is at the root of the problems is up to perception, though you're right that it was founded as a reaction to feminism. Kloo's said as much. Employment in the country HAS been a gender issue for a while. There isn't a day that goes by without either a man or a woman complaining about a woman or a man respectfully having something that the other has. The jobloss in this particular instance of it probably has more to do with the fact that …
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:13 PM
2

Would you consider it sexual harassment if I kept telling you about how your comments make me vertically masculine? Genuinely not trying to be an ass about it, but I figured it was a good start to an inside joke.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:08 PM
3

Edit: Wow downvoted? I thought you guys were all about the reddiquette here. Eh. Reddit as a whole does this. If it makes you feel any better, I didn't contribute to the downvotes. Also, you don't seem to identify with the community. Interesting that you make that distinction.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:05 PM
8

Now I'm confused. I have to ask: Why are you here commenting, exactly? Our conversation has nothing to do with that post, yet you're defending feminism without me actually blaming feminists for the situation we're in? Are you here to make a stand for feminists, or are you saying we should just accept the situation we're in? Some clairification of your intent would be nice.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:03 PM
9

This is an issue of our manual labor being outsourced though Partially. It's an issue of jobs being lost period, and men being impacted on a significantly higher level than women. Manual labor jobs weren't the only ones that were lost. My job was strictly an office job, yet I was laid off with about a few thousand of my co-workers, along with the majority of my industry. , not some evil feminist plot. Who the hell said it was a feminist plot?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 04:51 PM
7

This is a simple math problem though. If you have a population of Y competing for X number of jobs and suddenly Y doubles (women entering the workforce) of course unemployment is going to go up for the original Y population unless X doubles as well. The issue at hand is a current issue. Women have been in the workforce for over 50 years. This isn't a workforce population surge. It was a largescale drop in male workers. Even if there was a population surge, it doesn't change the fact that a socie…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 04:32 PM
8

I think the point is that men are being forced into it due to an inability to find employement. While there's nothing wrong with wanting to be a house husband, the role being forced on them by society and hiring practices will be a negative hit. In short, the problems that women had 50 years ago are going to be problems men face 15 years from now.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 03:58 PM
7

GENTLEMEN. It's only a matter of time before men get equal rights and representation. Keep fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 10:17 AM
2

Does anyone actually care anymore that women were oppressed more? Well, I don't. And I know you don't. Hell, I wonder if either of us believe it. Even if its true, it doesn't change anything that's going on now.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:55 PM
2

Undoubtedly. MRM is still in its infancy. I meant in a more broad way, not specifically talking about gender struggles.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:48 PM
1

I agree with your point and I know what you're saying by this, but I can't help but question the sanity of someone who rapes in self-defense/when they're cornered.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:46 PM
2

Very carefully. Honestly, depends on the candle. Even if it was one of the candles that would snuff out immediately with that force, the residual heat would've still ignited it. Ever blow out a candle and notice the tip still being red-hot for a few seconds? That's plenty hot enough to ignite most flammable substances.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:43 PM
2

In my experience, everyone is a liar. The question is if they have anything worth lying about.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:38 PM
-2

I know. I read it. My comment is just about the title of this post.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:31 PM
3

The "shame then fight then cajole then control" technique Step 1) Attempt to shame men and MRA's into silence. Step 2) When that doesn't work, fight them directly in arguments. Step 3) When the arguments are lost, try to cajole them nicely. Step 4) When they are unyielding, try to move the debate to where they can be controlled This isn't unique to feminism. They're the same tactics that were used against feminism in its early days. Funny how 'the feminheros' always turn into what they hate the …
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:02 PM
3

Statutory rape has always seemed like a retarded charge. You're punishing an older individual for having sex with a younger individual based on a question of whether or not they are mature enough to grant consent. I mean, I agree for like.. everything under 13, But christ.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:50 PM
2

Can anyone explain to me how we went from innocent until proven guilty to the exact opposite? Also, what's to get educated about? What are we supposed to be learning that will protect us from false allegations? Might as well just pack up my fucking bags and become a outlaw hermit, a villian charged with the crime of being a man.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:45 PM
-1

I can't help but be reminded that everything in Australia is deadly. They have giant spiders, jellyfish that will absolutely destroy you, kangaroos that'll punch your face off, women who'll sooner burn you to death before considering counselling, and a judicial system that sees justice in burning a man alive because he was an abusive husband.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:25 PM
9

Men should take this lesson to heart. When she gives you lip, don't smack her. Just burn her to death.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:23 PM
1

As much as I love chaining puns and silly strings of comments together, I just can't see myself doing it this time.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:19 PM
30

I can't help but wonder if you were dilberately trying to be an ass with this title. The guy's been stricken blind by his gunshot wounds. He's not seeing anything at all.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 01:03 PM
1

God, has it been that long? How time flies.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:58 PM
2

Well, the sexist remark that men don't enjoy shopping aside, the fact that most of them are saying either "All women are crazy all the time, this is nothng new." and my example "Efficient, supportive unemotional. HUBBY ROBOT to the rescue." Not taking things personally and being an emotionally castrated robot are two different things. I would hope my wife didn't want me to be a robot the last time she got pregnant.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:56 PM
1

For the dad, or for the mother? Because I can kind of see that working both ways.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 10:14 AM
-1

Here you go
/r/MensRights13/04/11 10:06 AM
1

Yeah. Sorry I haven't posted anything for a while. Like I said, I was on a seclusion vacation. You know, no tech, no phones. Just me, the great outdoors and a few funny looking bears.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:09 AM
1

I just wanted to take a moment and remind you how much I love the way you post.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 10:20 AM
1

Rantgrrl is awesome, isn't she? Makes me vertically masculine every time I see her post.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 10:15 AM
1

You seem to completely miss the point of this and all related conversations. And now you're bringing up the Taliban. Seriously, what's wrong with you, man?
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:46 AM
3

Not a Men's Rights issue. The title of this submission talks more about the father than the actual article does. Seriously. This is sensationalism at best, completely lying at worst.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:43 AM
1

Since otherwise, it's an unfalsifiable Kafka-trap. E.g. "Do you admit you contribute to oppression?" Yep. That point was irrefutable without proving it true, by design.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 12:58 PM
1

So, basically, men who find themselves in abusive situations for years are just cry babies. Would you also say the same thing for women who are in abusive relationships? You're blaming the victim, here, in either gender. This 'don't be a crybaby' attitude is absolute horseshit. If there's something wrong, you have every right to say something, and you don't need to supress your emotions because you're a man. Men feel just as trapped in those relationships as women do, and the stoic nature that p…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 12:46 PM
1

What happened 50 years ago to screw men over so badly? Where's the wayback machine? Wait a second. I'll just use wikipedia to draw my connections! Feminists and scholars have divided the movement's history into three "waves". The first wave refers mainly to women's suffrage movements of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (mainly concerned with women's right to vote). The second wave refers to the ideas and actions associated with the women's liberation movement beginning in the 1960s (…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 09:36 AM
1

I think perhaps some were just unlucky with their upbringing and some are just being cry babies and not taking responsibility for their own happiness... just a thought So you'd say that their issues are... trivial? Edit: Because I actually had something to say. It's pretty widespread, though apparently you don't take issue with being told not to 'be a cry baby.' Your father basically said that you can complain, but only if its so bad you can't do anything else about it. There's a lot of men who …
/r/MensRights06/04/11 08:57 AM
2

Not to be combative, but I'm agreeing with you. :)
/r/MensRights05/04/11 03:46 PM
2

Was waiting for someone to do this.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 02:46 PM
5

Your comment returned to me a very real, very uncomfortable fear. And it made me sadface. :(
/r/MensRights05/04/11 12:36 PM
3

Of course, there's a fair amount of circle-jerking here, but we have to present the evidence somewhere. Why not here? To be honest, there really isn't a lot of places where you can post this kind of stuff on reddit. Equality subs would have downvoted this entire thing into oblivion. I'm not saying because they hate men, but because the idea itself is alien to many people. Most people won't and don't believe it, even if its true. So, a lot of 'General Male Stuff' gets put here, ontop of the piles…
/r/MensRights05/04/11 12:32 PM
2

Shelley is also a man's name, btw. I knew a guy named Shelley. Met him when I was working at a store, thought I'd be meeting a woman. Turns out that I met a guy who put Duke Nukem's Man-nery to shame.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 12:26 PM
6

I was a white knight until the toxicity of r/MensRights melted it away. I've always wondered about things like parental custody(an issue that directly effected me as a child), but R/MR's made me a bit more aware of issues that effect men. I ususally ignore the blog posts, and check studies that are posted.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 12:12 PM
1

There just aren't enough upvotes for how awesome this quote is.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:34 AM
2

Actually, MR movement is a lot like the dawning days of the original feminism. There's a lot of opposition. there's a lot of challenges, and there's justice, somewhere that needs to be done. I say let the struggle continue. Not that I'm a person who thrives off of conflict, but because the more we push, the more misandry they'll put out, and the more backwards people will start to realize they are. If we just 'shut up' and take their hypocrisy, double standards and bias, when will it ever change…
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:29 AM
3

Yeah. Sorry for suggesting that, Kloo. I didn't know you had a track record for getting screwed for having an opinion. Fucking opinion haters.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:23 AM
7

Aw. And here I was thinking I was special when he sent me a note saying I'm banned from posting. I asked him whether or not I'd get a long and lengthy post about why. He hasn't responded yet.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:21 AM
1

Me? Rallying the troops? Nah. Don't need to, on this one. I ususally reserve that for paranoid misandrist trolls. This one will have perfectly normal people trolling his obvious bias nature.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 05:45 PM
1

2Xers aren't inheritly feminists or gay. It's that the community is feminist and supports lesbian couples. Though there's a lot of vitrolic feminsts there. Probably about as much as there are here.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 02:00 PM
3

Don't worry. I'll be likely joining you on that ban-wagon in a few hours, once he sees my comments being critical of his decisions, and how he just opened a floodgate for trolls. He's going to be one busy-ass mod. I guess he didn't realize that banning people creates negative sentiment which is like blood-in-the-water for trolls.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 11:32 AM
3

r/oney (which I also consider a feminist sub) And, ironically, it has more women in it than men about 90% of the time. Don't waste your time with OneY. Seriously. It's where all of the female 2Xers shove their SOs so they can babysit them.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 11:15 AM
8

i'm already accustomed to the vindictive "i'm going to downvote every comment you have ever made because it gives me somewhere to channel my impotent rage!" Of course you are! Why wouldn't you be accustomed to it? Isn't it your mantra? :) Trollstrollintrollstrollintrollstrollingtrolls Amirite?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:00 PM
15

Paranoid troll is paranoid.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:36 PM
19

Actually, the downvotes hit you before this post was up. Though thanks for confirming that you're a shameless troll, instead of a feminazi.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:35 PM
7

This is the feminazi troll from the comments btw guys FTFY.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:35 PM
1

The point of my question is that it's irrelevant what I actually believe and more important to what you can learn about yourself and what you believe in from a dissenting voice, truthful for not. Though, to ease your pain, generally I don't lie in MensRights. Unless its REALLY called for.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:20 PM
6

Actually, I was refering to the feminazi in the comments. Though I suppose it's hard to tell which tree you're pointing out when you're staring at the forest.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:44 PM
1

Does it really matter what I really believe as much as what you actually believe?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:41 PM
1

So.. man gets HIV from woman who doesn't tell him that she has HIV. Totally the dude's fault. Imma just leave the idea of blaming the victim right here. Have a good one.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:38 PM
13

Good read, would recommend to anyone. Though I have to wonder about your feminazi. I mean, she seems extreme, even for feminazis. If it wasn't in AskReddit, I'd suggest she was probably just trolling, but.. Christ.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:35 PM
1

It's a sad but true fact you speak.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 01:44 PM
21

Ohm, I think you're missing a letter.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 10:01 AM
1

Derp? Despite some signs of discrimination, both men and women generally fare better in terms of salary and advancement in “mismatched” fields, like construction for women and education administration for men (where they earn 31 percent more than women). Shatkin says he’s beginning to see more men migrate into female-typed fields like healthcare and education because “that’s where the jobs are.” Similarly, women are moving into more financial and professional jobs, like pharmacy and financial ma…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 09:53 AM
1

Why did they get a biased moron to comment on the MRM? Why not get a representative of the MRM itself? I know, right? I mean, why would they put someone up there who has a bias against the MRM instead of someone who has a bias for it? I'd prefer someone who wasn't bias at all to either one of those.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 09:44 AM
3

That kid has no other father. He needs to be there for him. I'm a dad, and I was ready for fatherhood when my wife asked if I was interested in having a kid. He's obviously not ready for it. You're also telling this to someone who didn't grow up with a father. Yes. I wanted a father to play ball with. But my mother was capable of supporting me on her own, taught me the lessons I needed to know and gave me the sense to know right from wrong. You telling me, telling men, that they need to blindly …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:57 PM
0

Well, this was in OneY(The male version of 2X) that I'm talking about. Mostly white knights and feminists checking in on their boyfriends.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:12 PM
5

Unfortunately, I agree. MR is made out of people who oppose feminism. It's not to say that they don't respect the rights women should be afforded, but it's a problem going back to 'The ends don't justify the means.' Women got their rights at the cost of men's rights, and they got them in the second wave by a combination of protests and demonizing men. Sadly, large numbers of feminists are just as caustic to MRAs as MRAs are to them. I got attacked in OneY for being critical of feminism for the d…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:00 PM
2

Admit it, who doesn't? I admit it. It stems from our love of popping packing paper. You know, the ones with the little bubbles? The bigger the pop, the more satisfying it is.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:56 PM
4

prison is the new slavery There is more truth here than meets the eye. Privatized prisons ftl.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:53 PM
1

Does rootbeer count? Because I like rootbeer.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:47 PM
2

Normally, I'd say your paranoid, but I played a game a few days ago to see how much karma I could rack up with a few comments. I wrote down the comments and how much Karma they had when I was done. Yesterday, I said something critical of feminists in OneY(You know, where all the 2X'ers leave their husbands for daycare?). All of my posts fell 3-5 points that same day, putting a large number of them into negatives. But I have to say. If I went to a Call of Duty related sub and said 'HALO RULES', I…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:46 PM
2

Don't punish the kid for the sins of the mother. The ends don't justify the means. Extorting money out of the biological father who doesn't wish to have a child to support a needy child and mother is no more 'right' than malicious Robin Hood-ery. And he shouldn't let her raise him with her fucked up morals. He doesn't want the child. How is it his, or your place to tell a mother how to raise her child?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:31 PM
2

It's a troll. And even if its not, I think anyone with half a brain can tell it's a seriously damaged person.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:08 PM
3

You know perceptions are really screwed up when sarcasm and what people will really mean aren't that different.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:05 PM
1

This isn't a forced parenthood. When your brother impregnated that woman he signed a deal for which there is no retraction clause. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. If you want to have rights you have to respect those of the people around you. This woman cannot be subjected to a forced abortion. And that's why MRAs advocate opt-outs. You're thinking about the pro-life/pro-choice battle. MRAs aren't pro-life or pro-choice by definition. Tell your brother to man up because real men deal…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:58 PM
-1

but she gave him HIV...would it still be her fault?! Yes, actually. Seeing how most people wouldn't have sex at all with someone they knew had HIV. So her fault for not telling him. And kudo to you for comparing a removable fetus to an life threatening STD. learn from his lesson And who's teaching that lesson? Moralizing Big Brother? The woman who will use Big Brother to extort money from him? and be a man And here we go, back to the culture that defines men, instead of men that define culture. …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:46 PM
1

Hilarious linkage. Though I agree generally with how men are getting treated here. I don't think anyone here seriously believes there is justice in forcing a man to pay for a child he doesn't want. I'm pretty sure you're just getting trolled.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:38 PM
5

My only problem with pro-lifers is their willingness to criminalize abortion. The rest of it makes sense for people to think that way, even if I don't particularly agree with it.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:25 PM
3

run away from their responsibilities Responsibilities being imposed on them by others, not responsibilities they've accepted. Consent to sex is not the consent to fatherhood, and forcing someone to become a parent against their wishes and will is criminal. how different the responses would be if he wanted to keep the child and she didn't. Bringing a child into the world should be a mutually accepted thing, but seeing how women have the ultimate right over what goes on with their body(Or should, …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:16 PM
5

this is a shitty thing to do. So is moralizing and supporting extortion. You seem to have no problem doing either. He also needs... to be able to do what he wants and not be forced to be chained to this woman or a child he never wanted.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:09 PM
3

But.. he's an INDIAN TECHNOCRAT. Dude's gotta know what he's talking about. Hell. I didn't even know there was a nation that functioned under a technocratic government.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 10:37 AM
0

Unwelcome skepticism is unwelcome!
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:55 PM
15

I think I feel more sorry for the kids these women may raise one day, and that they will be instilled with this same set of beliefs and ideals.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 03:36 PM
1

Acting as though /r/mensrights is homophobic or easily trolled by challenging straightness is just weird. Trolling from the homophobic perspective in MR is a lot like going to a gun show and then telling everyone that everyone else absolutely hates guns. I mean, why else would they be here if they weren't interested in men? Joking aside, I've only seen one good troll on MR, and he treads the thin line between tool and troll.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:23 PM
2

Shame on you. Moralizing in public.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:49 PM
8

A)Calling Misandry on the blogger. Don't care if he's a dude. Man-hate is man-hate. B) Statistics are bullshit. If he looks at the ratio of single fathers to single fathers with abused children, of course the fathers are going to have a skewed ratio. They have a small sample size. We live in a society where women are given custody over children systematically. If you look at single mothers vs single mothers with abused children, the ratio is going to be saturated and won't provide any worthwhile…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:35 PM
1

Thanks. I love attention, positive or negative.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:00 AM
0

Oh no, 3rd degree burns. Violin Regardless of the severity, it was still self-inflicted. Had they died, it would've been granted a Darwin Award, though at that age, I suspect children were already running around. And this is just a tangent to my original point. It has nothing to do with this thread or my point. Don't call out asshatery and pretend you're the intellectual savior of a conversation.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:55 AM
1

How exactly is she a horrible person? She expected men to pay for her coffee. She's offended when men offer to pay for her coffee. Either one suffices by itself in the way that she expects certain universal behavior from half of the world's population that positively impacts her. I did say "Kudos to her realizing that there's something wrong, atleast." First step in recovery is realizing you have a problem. Also, I didn't mention 'the F-word' or 'our side.' Maybe you're confusing me with someone…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:41 AM
1

No more than anyone else who pretends they can connect dots between continents. I think the only thing in your comments that genuinely offends me is that you use 'Atheist' to mean 'Anti.' My delicate literay senses aside, you're saying that atheists are opposing someone/something by using the word like that, when atheists are just individuals who do not believe in a god. The rest of it is "yet another idiot" talk.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:37 AM
0

From what I understand... Get your facts straight. Perception following opinion followed by a demand to seek factual information without providing reason to do so. What exactly are you contributing aside from declaring yourself a well informed asshole? You realize that you're just as subject as "Go check your facts," as I am, right? So, I'll respond with a polite "No, u."
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:35 AM
1

There is one thing that you have to acknowledge though. and my comment: I'm not denying that there's issues with feminism and issues with faith systems For this: If an allegedly intellectual structure can't withstand being critiqued and it's adherents act in a fanatical manner, then what do you call it? What I called it in my comment. a movement that's decayed Comparing feminism to christianity is a stretch by hundreds of miles. Even if you were to take feminism at its idealogical prime or ideal…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:18 AM
4

MensRights Issue Error 404. Mensright Issue Not Found.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:36 PM
0

I didn't realize there were legal limits to how hot coffee can or can't be. Still. Taking legal action on someone over the temperature of coffee seems pretty stupid. You bought coffee, which is known to be served hot. Spilled it on yourself, then turned around and sued the company for injuring yourself with a product they advertise as hot. And I think the ruling was based on the fact that a notification of the contents being hot wasn't explicitly stated on the surface of the container, which now…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:30 PM
1

Sensational. Well played, sir.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:04 PM
2

You should do an IamA, I bet a lot of people are curious about the life of someone who uses transparent sarcasm.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:59 PM
2

I normally don't, that whole "Don't shit where you work" concept and all. She just struck a nerve, really.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:56 PM
1

TIL that being a violent criminal can lead to some interesting BSDM Though the article speaks to me like a poorly written version of a 'Big Brother(Sister?)' story.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:48 PM
4

Did you mean to reply to me? I hold the door open for anyone who I happen to see coming by, hence gender neutral wording.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:40 PM
-2

I'd sympathize with your inability to use the English language, but I simply don't care enough to. Instead, I will casually berate you by stating my dissatisfaction in a passive aggressive way. You're embarassed because you were yelled at by an unreasonable woman, because you were being nice to her. Ergo, you were embarassed by the fact that you were nice to her, since the local broadcasting of such acts is embarassing to you. Golf clap
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:27 PM
-1

LOL! Thats fine that other males will be the butt of public humiliation, its just not going to be me anymore, lol! Doesn't change the fact you're a sensastionalist. Although the double lol and irrelevant reply does tell me you're trollin'. Didn't recognize you before, brother. How's life?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:27 PM
6

It's not so much about the coffee as it is that she has an expectation of an entire gender to do or not do something as insignificant as buying coffee. It's like expecting women to sew up your clothes when you rip them, or constantly carrying bandages in case you cut yourself. Sure, some women may do that, but if you were to expect all of them to do that, or be offended when they do it because they're limiting your masculinity, makes you an asshole. Also, re: Coffee pouring. I think the real ter…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:18 PM
0

social martyr Sensationalist much?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:09 PM
2

I'm sorry you feel embarassed by being nice to people. Seems like a terrible handicap.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:07 PM
1

Sorry, it's hard to tell if you're trying to argue against my point or for my point. My only point is that insanity is an inappropriate coverup for being a conflicted and terrible person. It's not that her conflict makes her terrible. Either of those thoughts by themselves would make her terrible. I just add conflicted in there because it's simply what she is.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:37 PM
1

.. Seriously? You're comparing a movement that's decayed to a religion that's sculpted socities. Yeah. You probably pissed off more than just feminists and christians with that. I'd go as far as to say the two of you have some serious issues with your perceptions on things. I'm not denying that there's issues with feminism and issues with faith systems, but you both provide massive, sweeping generalizations to compare it to something else using massive, sweeping generalizations. Golf Clap Good j…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:32 PM
1

I remember reading this before it made it to Men's Rights. I laughed pretty hard. This guy is awesome.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:08 PM
15

Let them get offended. I mean, seriously. Would you have wanted to be nice to them knowing they'd act that way? No? Would you go out of your way to try to piss them off? Hell. I would. Next time they get pissed at you opening a door or being nice, be sure to offer to carry their groceries to their car, escort them places, and all that. Fuck them with kindness!
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:01 PM
31

The way I see it, either someone appreciates it that I'm being helpful, or I'm pissing off a some idiot who's on their high-horse. Either way, I win.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:59 AM
27

The hilarious thing is that it doesn't make her insane, in spite of her claim. She doesn't want to pay for it and thinks a man should be nice and pay for it for her, but 'she loses her independence' by letting him buy it for her, and that threatens her confidence, and she hates it. It's more accurate to say she's just a terrible and fairly conflicted person. Saying she's insane means that she's less at fault for being a bitch. Kudos to her realizing that there's something wrong, atleast.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:58 AM
1

In her credit, her writing does get better the further you go. I was probably a bit unfair when I compared it to Tolkien. He stayed fairly steady throughtout his big triology and the Hobbit. I can understand why her first book got kicked aside, though. Zero foundation and writing that's still fairly poor post-editing. I can't imagine what the first HP book looked like before editing. Her first book was almost a chore to get through, but her third and fourth H.P book were refreshing to read.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:13 AM
1

I know he is. I still like him, though. Or her. Or it. Whatever.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:02 AM
2

You "New Jersians" couldn't hit a beach ball with a tennis racket, let alone play a man's sport like baseball.. And how dare you complain about our driving. JUST BECAUSE WE PUT OUR BLINKERS ON A QUARTER MILE BEFORE OUR TURN AND DRIVE 20 MILES UNDER THE SPEED LIMIT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE BAD DRIVERS. WE'RE JUST AFRAID OF GETTING OUR KNEECAPS BROKEN BY NEW JERSEY RAGERS SO WE MAKE SURE TO GIVE THEM RIGHT OF WAY EVEN WHEN ITS UNCALLED FOR. /caps And actually, I prefer Delaware's beaches to NJ's beaches…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:01 AM
1

In all fairness, they had been talking about it for about thirty minutes before I said something. I had a pretty good idea of what I wanted to say before I said it.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:56 AM
1

I know. I really should.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:55 AM
0

As a resident of a state neighboring New Jersey, I'd like to make a retort based on factual information: New Jersey Sucks. Edit: Though you have a very lovely aquarium in Camden. But that's only enough to partially redeem Camden, not hardly enough to redeem the whole state, and certainly no excuse for North Jersey.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 05:47 PM
2

The light-headedness has more to do with the hormones, less to do with the bloodloss. That aside, if a woman has cramps that debilitate her, either she needs to see a doctor or find an occupation more friendly to her condition. Why should her co-workers, or her employers for that matter, make special concessions for her? There are women out there without those problems who are capable of doing that job without needing to push the responsibility onto a man. It boils down to her being unwilliing o…
/r/MensRights22/03/11 05:28 PM
2

Eh. It's a hard call. There's a few hundred miles worth of poorly written teenage fantasies that involve the sacred trust between a student and teacher getting violated sexually. My 9th grade science teacher was smoking hot, in her mid twenties. If you asked me then if I wouldn't mind a relationship with her, I would have told you 'I ain't no square, that betty would be dancing to the tune of my fleshflute.' If you asked me now that same question, I'd say no. Aside from the fact that she's aged …
/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:33 PM
4

TL;DR: Don't be a tard in order to give us confidence boosts. It's insulting. edit: Unless its in bed, because mentally challenged people are hot and we love to roleplay well-meaning social workers that are sexually repressed.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:14 PM
2

Guess I'll just have to live with it and adjust, like every other self-disrespecting man. Nuts.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:05 PM
-1

It's not so much that it's obvious so much as it'd be too heavy for her to lift while she's PMSing, which she apparently does 21 days a month.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:03 PM
0

I loled. PMS tacos.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:58 PM
-1

I would, but I'm afraid she'd just leave them there.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:57 PM
-1

But.. but.. but.. if I don't brag about it, how will they know? I want my due MRA attention, damnit. My work's a damn taco fest.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:06 PM
1

Oh, good. I was feeling alienated for a moment.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:04 PM
-1

Sort of like every conversation we've had up to this point, amirite?
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:03 PM
1

Eh. I don't stay in character that much on MensRights. I've never been published.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:46 PM
2

I know I am but what are you? ... Wait a second.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:43 PM
4

I'd like to point out that this is Philadelphia we're talking about. This is the same city that brought you abortions in a jar. There's something about Philadelphia that just makes people insane. I blame the air and New Jersey.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:42 PM
1

Trite, to be sure, but you should probably mention what type of rape it is in your description. I went expecting something entirely different from what I got.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:37 PM
1

Didn't bother to read the article, because it's probably the same 'Guns/booze/jokes/books/whatever' causes 'deaths/addictions/cynicism/heretical thinking/whateverideal' article. No. Sexist jokes don't cause discrimination. Discrimination causes sexist jokes. The same way it causes racist jokes.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:33 PM
0

Writing is some painful business. It's not as bad once you're out there. I've been published three times now, and after the first book I had published, the second two were published with almost no resistance.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 12:38 PM
2

Begin Rant: Rowling's writing is a lot like Tolkien's, only more for young adults. For a former English teacher, you'd think she could write better. The fantasy market is saturated anyway. Even if her first Potter novel was as well written as her third or fourth, it probably would have still gotten thrown out, male or female. Publishers also look for your foundation, whether or not you're already well known or popular. You could write like the intellectual offsprings of Ray Bradbury, Brian Jacqu…
/r/MensRights22/03/11 12:36 PM
1

I came here to say that the 'Double Standard' means that they get 2 days in jail for every year difference in their age. Then I realized I fail at math.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 01:53 PM
–

Good effort. This isn't the first time I've had this conversation, and that's not the first time that source was called. The data, obtained from the Joseph J. Peters Institute in Philadelphia, came from interviews with 790 girls and women who had reported a sexual assault and who were subsequently examined at Philadelphia General Hospital between 1973 and 1975. A)790 people is an incredibly small sample size. B)It polls women only from one subculture, those from the Philadelphia area. Also, if y…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 09:48 PM
–

Right. Studies actually show that rape victims have more emotional distress when they have more physical injuries. I conduct these studies myself.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 09:29 PM
–

So, instead of unsubscribing, you chose to drop a self post here complaining about how uninterested you are. Obvious troll is obvious. golf clap
/r/MensRights16/03/11 05:22 PM
–

You know, Hugo Schwyzer looks really familiar to me. Pretty handsome guy, really. Oh, wait. I remember who he looks like now. Didn't recognize him without the orange jumpsuit and crowbar Mr. Freeman is arguably cooler, though.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 05:01 PM
1

Have a mint. Make sure you are kissably fresh. I expected this to be a mentos ad. And then I remembered mentos ads were much cooler.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 04:53 PM
2

Your rant has made me vertically masculine. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 04:47 PM
1

Not a mens right issue. And from AOLnews.com? Be trollin'.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 04:12 PM
0

Yes. Because if one gender does something wrong, we must immediately do it as well. Lets emphasize everything we do to show those women that we're just as awesome as they are! Over exaggeration isn't part of the problem at all. Of course not, it's part of the solution!
/r/MensRights16/03/11 04:11 PM
1

It's very useful. I hope to be a regular contributer.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:59 PM
1

I agree. I'm contributing to it. See?
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:58 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/manprovement/comments/g57sa/how_to_be_a_better_liar_5_easy_steps/ Relevant.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:58 PM
–

On a serious note, and because I know my other comment will get downvoted into oblivion as soon as anyone sees it: This actually does hurt more than it helps. Anyone who's ever had delays in their divorce is basically held from moving on. It means trying to have a healthy relationship after the fact impossible if you wish to collect on money that may be owed to you. Though, overall, alimony is a dark grey subject to me. I've seen more cases of it being abused than not, but I've also seen it do s…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:42 PM
–

It's West Virginia. Who cares? Just a bunch of inbred coal miners.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:38 PM
–

Everyone expects the Spanish Inquisition.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:35 PM
–

You make a compelling point. This changes my perspective on everything. Honestly, the last time I was savagely beaten wasn't quite as bad as that time a guy stuck his wang in me. Aside from the blunt trauma, the blood transfusions, chipped tooth and altered appearance, the beating wasn't half bad.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:30 PM
–

Rape, by itself, isn't as bad as most other physical crimes. PSTD and mental trauma that are associated with the rape stem from the violence, the assault, that takes place in order to put the offender in a situation where rape is possible. Rape can still be non-violent while being non-consentual. It's not as common in cases where males rape a female, being that it's simply easier to overpower them than to set up a blackmail/intimidatation. It sounds terrible, but that's the reality of the situat…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:03 PM
1

Could you imagine the conversation between those two kids? Friend: Dude, I totally did your mom. Mother's son: You did. And she got sent to jail and I went to foster parents and now I'm going to have trust issues with my mother because she screwed my best friend which means not only will I have problems with authority figures it also means that I'll have problems trusting same-gendered individuals and will be forced to rely on younger females deep breath for even the most basic of companionships…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:51 PM
1

The lie, in that case, is that I'm a nerd bitch. I'm actually a nerd bastard.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:46 PM
1

Not always.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:42 PM
1

I'm a pathological liar, but it doesn't mean I lie all the time. Just most of it. But, if you were curious, the numbers: 313,232,044 US Population with a M to F ratio of .97Male/1Female So, slightly less than half of the population is male. Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html That website estimates some of the numbers, but I'd hope they're a credible source. Edit: It's also worth noting that, for working ages, the male to female ratio is listed as "15…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:37 PM
–

Read it. One. Word. At. A. Time. I prefer to read my articles every other word at a time. It makes for a very interesting article when you omit half of it. Most of the time, it doesn't make sense, but the times when the article makes MORE sense because of it totally make the effort worth it. Not saying your's is one of those articles, though. Regardless, thanks for the article.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 05:26 PM
–

Oh, never. Pot never calls the kettle black. I was just introducing myself.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 05:17 PM
-2

Dude, why are women so indecisive? First we're that guy with the nice car, then we're toilet paper, then we're misogynic swine with small junk. Can't they just stick to one insult like real men of quality do?
/r/MensRights15/03/11 04:13 PM
–

I am not only a nerd but also work in nerd culture, and I've never yet met a shallow nerd bitch. Hi there.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 04:09 PM
–

I think its safe to say that women in the US frequently do 60% of the work, seeing how they're 60% something percent of our population. But hey. These are statistics. People lie more about these things than I do on any given day in reddit. Though the point is irrelevant. Even if you had such data, why does it matter? What would you use it for, aside from gender leveraging and entitlement whoring? "Oh, men/women work harder and longer than women/men. We deserve XXXX!" Edit: Yes. They want quadrup…
/r/MensRights15/03/11 04:01 PM
3

I'm a mother and a father. Don't ask. It's a joy to raise kids. They have brief 2 to 3 minute moments that justify the years of pain.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:59 PM
–

It's all good. Though, really, I lie in this subreddit less than I do in others. This stuff hits home quite frequently.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:55 PM
–

You know you're popular on reddit when your post immediately gets 20-40 up/downvotes without having any comments on it.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:53 PM
–

Beats me. I make shit up as I go.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:48 PM
–

Same prosecutor charges 16 year old boys with 25 to life charges without even so much as a wince. Tru' story. Edit: Also, this guy is a poor liar. Everyone knows that prosecutors don't feel pain.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:40 PM
0

I love how this is the top comment right now, and it has a negative score. I don't think I could have put your point in any better perspective, so I'll put down my keyboard and stop trying to improve on it. Thank you for that.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:26 AM
–

Also, I am deeply mistrustful of anyone who says, "We need to protect the interent from...". If only there were enough upvotes in the world.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:24 AM
-3

I'll admit to a little trolling in the Sub Reddit, but I'd like to think most of it is the Robin-Hood style of trolling, not this ass-hatery.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:24 AM
0

I don't know. The deltas seem to have the right idea triangulated. The sigmas aren't exactly all-inclusive, though.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:11 AM
1

Remind me to be on your team at the next annual MensRights dodge ball tournament. Where we will all undoubtedly be wearing high heels because it broadcasts a powerful message of awareness. Edit: Actually, that sounds like an awesome handicap, to have to wear high heels in a dodge ball game. We'd need to play outdoors, though. And in mud.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:04 AM
1

And I was hoping for a good joke there, too. But no. You had to be someone trying to make a point. Is it dehumanizing for a woman to wear a collar and leash that's marketed for dogs? Why wouldn't it be emasculating for a man to wear shoes marketed for women? The only men that I know that actually like wearing high heels are men who are deliberately trying to look like women.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:00 AM
1

Is dodge ball really a guy thing, though? Growing up, the girls threw the hardest when we played dodge ball.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:52 PM
1

they are mainly obsessed with penises. And why wouldn't they be? They're fucking awesome, right? Seriously, though. That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:50 PM
1

"demasculate" ... not a word. Hey. It took a lot of effort to ignore my spell checker for that one. You had to go and ruin it. :(
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:47 PM
1

Never. How could you suggest that I act like a dog. A hound of all things. If anything, I'd probably act like a chihuahua. Cute, yappy and full of spunk, used in a bunch of old 90s Taco Bell commercials. Yeah. That'd be me. As for being a bully, I think that's something you'd want to ask yourself. Something tells me you might be surprised at the answer.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 09:21 PM
1

Better yet: Walk a Mile in His Penile Plethysmograph -- and have walk around with a a "peter meter" device attached to their panties. That's one of the barbaric devices that too many men falsely accused of rape end up having to endure (it's a sort of junk science penis lie detector). I laughed, until I realized you weren't making that up. It makes you wonder what they would have to do to detect female arousal. Would they have to insert something and do a moisture check, or something?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 09:04 PM
1

Yes. Men who don't wear high heels.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 08:58 PM
1

I don't know, why is it emasculating for men to throw on a dress but empowering for a woman to put on a pair of pants? I'm going to feel REALLY silly if the punchline is obvious.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 08:56 PM
-2

Oh. Sorry. I didn't actually read the post. I just hopped on the bandwagon while the wheels were still greased. I often times give the impression that I'm serious when I'm not, and not serious when I am. I suppose that's the price to using this account in MR.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:33 PM
1

Oh, sorry. Didn't realize you had hundreds of posts. This changes everything. Your experience with posting has well afforded you the right to be a dick. How dare they question you, the peons.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:28 PM
7

You have made me realize how brilliant this is. This is the second best thing to adopting a puppy and walking it infront of a woman's fitness club. Why rape women when we can just manipulate them into sleeping with us? Brilliant!
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:23 PM
1

I think he writes a little bit like Bradbury, myself. Have you ever seen that man write? Fantastic.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:19 PM
0

Yep. You should read his comment to my comment to your comment. Trolls trolling trolls trying to troll trolls, amirite?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:15 PM
0

Read the fucking post SO WHAT?! DIDJA GET THE POINT AT ALL? No need to get your panties in a wad.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:10 PM
2

You probably won't get many bad comments on r/IAMA. Even if you do, they're likely to just be trolls. And even further still. 'Who cares, it's the internet.' I did an IAMA a little ways back about my actual problem with being a pathological liar. Few people cared, let alone said anything negative.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:02 PM
3

Your points are valid. It really is an over-reaction on the blogger's part. Now, had a gender neutral rally to support women who were victims of violent crimes required all men attending to wear those heels, I'd probably see the reaction more justified. But these guys did this of their own free will. It's still demasculating for them, but it's their choice to do it. They could have just as easily paid their fee and carried those shoes around, or worn them on their ears as far as anyone cares. I'…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:37 PM
-1

Dissecting someone's post line-by-line isn't patronizing? It is patronizing. Sucks when you start patronizing someone, and then someone starts doing it to you. Doesn't it?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:26 PM
4

I'm upset that your 2 pence is worth more than my 2 cents. Damn british currency.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:01 PM
0

I was really disappointed when I got that orange red and didn't get another bit of poetry. More stuff: Remember where you are. This is reddit. More patronizing. Trust me, when I found out about it I was in disbelief myself. Using a previously shared thought to establish a type of unity in order to present a more compelling point. Badly. I certainly would never suggest to anyone here to blindly accept any story, thoughts, stats, etc. written here. Being contradictory. Or hypocritical. I'm not sur…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:52 PM
3

Yes. Lets all demasculate ourselves to show our support for women.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:38 PM
0

I'll be honest. I really don't like OneY. I'm okay with 2X, and I'm okay with MensRights, but OneY feels like that one kid you've had the suspicion about in highschool that led you to believe he was born in a test-tube and raised by an omish family. There's just something always off about it. Like it was born with a reason but there's a pretext hidden there somewhere and you just can't put your finger on.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:31 PM
1

Holy CRAP. You're a poet.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:34 PM
-1

Yep. I posted one of those posts.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:29 PM
1

You must be a woman. You patronize skepticism. I relay this story every once in a while as this subreddit gains more readers and it never fails that someone wants proof. You provide 'facts' without providing real sources. I don't have the court order if that's what you're looking for. You spread gossip. Not sure where real dad was. Heard he was in prison. You're emotional. ... NO JOKE. And you're threatening men, ... in America you're dead ... How's MR treating you?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 01:01 PM
1

Dear sir or Madam, I am offically downvoting you for being skeptical and asking for proof of such an event. Clearly you are being disruptive to this conversation. Good day.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:55 PM
2

Could be that the problem is biological. It could be related to menstrual cycle. Men don't have a week every month where they're potentially in pain, women do. Not saying that it validates or gives permission for women to be absent and neglect their duties, just a musing in regards to why that might be the case.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:52 PM
0

Truth. For a subreddit for women, you sure do see a lot of Yes-men there.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:03 PM
2

I'll thank you to not insult ignorant assholes by comparing him to us. Please credit it to him being born in 1999. Kids these days. Sheesh. I mean. Look at how many times he has to say that same combination of words. If I wanted to insult women, I'd do it in a more subtle way, and I certainly wouldn't use the same insult twice in a single thread, let alone a single sentence. All he's doing is repeating the same thing over and over again. A true ignorant asshole would be better at being an ignora…
/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:00 PM
11

I played with Barbies. The only bad thing that ever happened to me is that I became a pathological liar that lies about playing with Barbies.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 05:52 PM
5

It happens. I'm sure you care about the baby, but both you and your G/F need to realize that having healthy, happy parents is better than having Barbie's Beach and Bikini House. If you need time with her/physical satisfaction, tell her. If the way finances are being handled is a problem, you need to talk to her about it. If you can't come to an agreement, do what you have to do to make sure you take care of yourself and your kid. The health bills you're not going to get around. If the kid is sic…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 02:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter