TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A_Vinegar_Taster Archive

View 7 posts and 79 comments by A_Vinegar_Taster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Apologize. Make a point to get HR involved in the apology. Then, the next time she causes a problem, let HR know about it. If she ever uses the F-word, let HR know about it. Let them know you feel unsafe. Make them generate a report that says you filed a complaint. Repeat.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:31 PM
6

Yes, this is sexual assault, and if you flip the sexes it is obvious.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:25 PM
5

The whole AI gf/bf thing is a terrible trap. Human beings have real emotions and can honestly get addicted to this kind of stuff, and I can only imagine the waves of self-deletion when these companies go out of business or have some massive data corruption that wipes out the virtual partners that millions of people are in love with. Don't do heroin and don't do virtual partners.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:58 PM
1

I don't think that they will be able to change the laws to send any man accused by any woman in prison forever. I'm pretty sure that isn't going to happen. You think I'm dumb for doubting that? Take your meds.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:20 PM
1

Pretty sure that isn't going to happen.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:54 PM
2

Nah. F 'em. This is thrown out in the world to raise your blood pressure and to make you run around defending yourself. Their goal is to make you mad.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 12:35 AM
1

This is ragebait, brothers.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:45 PM
1

There's no one way to do it, but I grew up as a latch-key kid with two working parents raised by TV. I think I turned out well. I had freedom and responsibility and trust. I didn't always do the right thing, but I feel that as I grew into an adult, I realized my own errors and corrected them. I guess what I wanted to say is that I hope not all parents wait until they have a big bank account and a house and a dog and stable jobs to have a kid. I'm living proof that kids can develop and flourish w…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:41 PM
4

No, I understand what you are saying, I'm not trying to be insulting or argumentative. I believe that the urge to procreate is a strong, hardwired biological instinct in all organisms that reproduce sexually (excluding a minority of outliers) I believe that this impulse manifests itself in our behaviors. I do recognize that human beings born with a uterus are hardwired (in utero) with many maternal instincts (excluding a minority of outliers). I believe that suppressing any strong biological urg…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:27 PM
9

Just had a conversation with my lady about this exact topic this morning. We were talking about a video that hoe math did where he pointed out that women have a biological desire for children, and that if that gets suppressed, it will come out in different behaviors. I think the example he used was a beaver that lived as a pet in a house, it would take couch cushions and area rugs and everything it could grab and drag it into the hallway to build a dam out of instinct. His argument was that as w…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:22 PM
3

No, I think you're right. You said it perfectly. But, it makes me sad to think that you aren't getting recognized for trying to be the better person. Keep doing the right thing. I hope that even if no one else knows you are walking a hard - but correct - path, you do.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:11 PM
22

You should not feel bad for anything you didn't do. I'm sorry this is weighing on you. The only thing I can say is that you need to treat it like someone said you started the Great Fire of London in 1666. If someone accused you of that, you'd just look at them with an "are you fn serious right now?" expression and just move on with your day. Same thing. Keep your distance from anyone trying to make you feel bad for who you are just because some other person who looks like you did something awful…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:37 PM
5

I take that as a win, my friend! I'm happy for you.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:13 PM
1

I am so with you on all of this. Completely, 100%. Starve them of oxygen. Let them own cats.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:11 PM
2

See, while I admire your eloquence and dedication to data, you know this isn't going to sway her, right? You're dead on accurate, and you've invested the time into knowing the debate backwards and forwards, but is it changing minds, or is it just disrupting your peace? There is no return on investment.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:22 PM
4

You're right. My proposal is to preserve the mental health and peace of men. Neither men nor women should be subject to sexism. If someone hates you or blames you or abuses you because of your sex, then that person is not a positive factor in your life and you should cut them off. The fight for systemic and legal equality will not be fought on the subs of reddit, or on X or in the comments section of YT. Paradoxically, the more we engage with sexists who hate us, the more fuel we give to their f…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 11:24 AM
9

I hope this made an improvement in your life. We have such precious little time.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 11:11 AM
12

I'm not saying that we should cut off all women by any means. I'm saying when you encounter someone who is sexist with you, don't go to war with them - remove yourself. Save your peace. Women are not a monolith; you'll find a lot of them who are either outright allies or who have the baseline expectation of equality. For everyone else, move on.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:43 AM
13

I say that you should cut toxic people out of your life. If someone hates/dislikes/insults/blames/abuses you because of your sex, you should leave. Do not engage with people who are terrible to you. You won't change their minds.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:25 PM
19

Yeah, that's true. I guess what I'm saying is that I've had a long life full of arguing with people, and if I've learned anything it is that changing someone's mind is almost impossible. Sure, if they are weak willed, you can push them or cajole them into seeing your point of view, but even then, the odds are that they will just spring back to their old position. People change internally, not externally. So, I'm suggesting that men stop engaging people who are anti-men. I don't think there is a …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:03 PM
9

Can you reply to all? That could be fun.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 08:15 PM
3

I've always believed in equal treatment for everyone. Sure, there are differences and the sexes have different strengths, but I had internalized the first wave feminism of being cool and not thinking either sex was superior to the other. As time went on, the world kept changing, and I started seeing more and more people hating men openly, and treating us like we were the problem. As you all probably know it kept getting worse and worse. The real breaking point was with an ex of mine who was supe…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:28 PM
12

There are unicorns out there. The problem is the urge that men have to get into a relationship. Like, we all want the happy ending so bad that we ignore the red flags and jump in, hoping it'll all work itself out. If men held out, and absolutely refused to date crazy, they would not waste their time and be able to find a suitable partner. ...or you could start dating dudes.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:14 PM
1

Ah yes! This was what I was hoping someone would say! I agree!
/r/MensRights14/04/26 01:59 AM
3

Start a business and make that a reality.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:23 PM
19

No. It would not be fair. It would also incentivize employers to not hire women. That is a month of PTO.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:23 PM
2

We're drifting quite a bit from the point I was trying to make. If you don't think that men ever held institutional power, then I guess that's the end of the conversation. I don't really want to try and prove that particular topic.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:18 PM
-1

Touche'! Yes, you are correct. Specifically, the rule of thumb was not an actual law. My mistake. I would still argue that beating one's wife was at one point not seen as a crime, but I have to correct myself on the rule of thumb - not a thing.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:52 PM
10

Yes, that seems like a disprovable definition.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:33 PM
-3

Are you familiar with the Rule of Thumb?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:32 PM
5

"I argue my suggestion that no early society could have collectively, consciously decided to restrain women for stability." Yes, you are correct. However, I did use the term "societal response", which would include the entire society and is unbound by a particular time. Perhaps I could have been clearer on this point so it would not have been confusing. "I argue that “disruption” is something that is not gender-specific, and that you choose to scrutinize the female-performed variety of it, alone…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:28 PM
-1

Sir William Blackstone (1865) offered a testament to the legal status of married woman. There, Blackstone stated that ‘‘[b]y marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law; that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs everything.’’ Do you not think that this is an example of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 03:15 PM
1

You actually don't seem to be talking about the main idea of my post, just poking holes in how I asked the question. I am asking: "What if female nature is inherently disruptive, and male control was a societal response that was embraced by everyone because it produced a better society?". When I look at my question, and then look at every paragraph you wrote, I don't see anywhere where you actually responded to it.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 03:11 PM
7

I don't think the patriarchy really exists today anymore. It is portrayed as a bunch of angry men that want to control women, but I think that is propaganda. Not a lot of people advocate FOR the patriarchy, so there is not competing view. The patriarchy is a Chesterton's Fence. It had existed for so long in human history that we had no idea why it was there in the first place. We didn't know what life would be like without it. So, not seeing the utility in the patriarchy, modern feminism has tor…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:58 PM
0

Not sure if you read the post, but I was talking about the hunter-gatherer days forward. Or, do you not believe that men were ever institutionally in charge throughout human history?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:50 PM
16

"But now they want more, because they lack logic, and fall for illogical ideologies that they stand nothing to gain from." Which was the point of my post. Could the patriarchy (admittedly in the past) have been created to actually make society better? Could women have agreed to go along with it because they recognized certain problems in the way they handle things?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:49 PM
-2

There are a lot of posts that are pointing out that in the modern day West there is no such thing as patriarchy, and that it is a myth. That's a fair point. But, just because it is this way today does not mean that that it was the same yesterday, a year ago, a decade ago, 50 years ago... Times change. If needed, I can provide receipts. It was not long ago when women were not afforded the same rights as men, and this was not an oversight - it was by design. If this is not a patriarchy, then I don…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:46 PM
29

Jeeze, you all are acting like an adult SA'ing a sixth grader is weird or something. (I'm being sarcastic)
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:29 AM
1

First off, this is an opinion. I'm not your emperor. I am just sharing my thoughts and deductions - you are free to think I'm wrong and I encourage you to exercise that freedom. I love my lady and I wold be heartbroken if she hit me. It would be really hard for me to just pick up and move on without her (scratch that - EXTREMELY hard). But when it comes to judging her character, one critical component of the love I have for her is mutual respect. We don't hit one another because we respect each …
/r/MensRights16/02/20 01:47 AM
1

Depending on how it shook out, I might call the cops. A good partner will not hit you. If your partner hits you, THEY ARE NOT GOOD. If you stay with a partner that you know hits, then you are asking to be hit. If you ask to be hit, you deserve to be hit.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:31 PM
1

They do. If someone sets my house on fire, it may not be my fault but it sure as hell is my responsibility to get out. If you voluntarily stay in a situation where you know you will be hurt, you are making a decision to be hurt. They do deserve it.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 02:20 AM
1

The simple answer is to leave. The correct answer is to leave. It isn't complicated; you're making it complicated so you can keep whatever it is that you like in the relationship. You have got to decide if whatever that thing is (great in bed, makes you feel safe, gives you a chance to feel good about yourself, buys you stuff...) is more important than your physical safety. Man or woman, no one should stay in abusive relationships. The good does not outweigh the bad. If anyone stays in an abusiv…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 01:41 PM
7

This is what equality looks like. ...also, smash the draft.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:58 AM
2

I don't want her hurt or harassed or to have her life destroyed, but the LEAST she could do would be to publicly own her mistakes. I mean, her sentence is suspended, so she doesn't actually have to serve any jail time. What punishment has she had to face? It seems like the bare minimum would be that her identity is revealed so that people can know that she's a liar that will try to put people in jail if she gets embarrassed. Right?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:52 AM
2

"Well, experts suggest women should work shorter weeks to allow for the unpaid work they do, such as domestic chores, which is on average about 4.5 hours every day, the study found. Men, on the other hand, contribute about half this time." By this logic, this should not apply to lesbians. If both women come home and do domestic chores, then they split the work. If that's the case, lesbians should work more than heterosexual women, because lesbians don't do as much domestic chores. Right?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:39 PM
13

No harm no foul, eh? Falsely accusing 12 guys of RAPE is just public mischief.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:33 PM
1

How about you come up with something new? There is nothing at all stopping women from making their mark in movies. Trying to one up and replace men is not the way to do this. You're not a trailblazer when you follow someone's trail. Ladies, bring something new to the table and stop trying to rub men's noses in your agenda. Just be you without trying to be so passive aggressive.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 05:30 PM
3

Honestly, we should see this and learn from it. This is the path our society is on these days, and we need to figure it out. Whenever a split in a demographic becomes apparent, it is immediately seized upon and the gaps are levered into chasms. We should see this and learn that divisions only make us turn on one another. We should try to see where we do it in our own lives, and not struggle for homogeneity. There's a lot of different people out there, and we should make our tent as big as we pos…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:42 AM
2

I don't buy the "unpaid domestic work" argument. There is no law that says a woman has to clean the house. There is no branch of the police that will arrest a woman for not cooking dinner. Women are perfectly capable of not doing laundry, not doing the dishes, not cooking or cleaning or arranging the little decorative soap bars for the guest bathroom. Women choose to do these things and it's time we all face the reality of that. No healthy relationship is going to crumble if a woman chooses not …
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:31 AM
1

Here come the trans-women gangs.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 12:47 AM
26

Come on, Trudeau, it's the current year. Get it together.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:16 AM
1

Here's the problem. If the alleged rape actually happened, but the victim (for whatever reason) is incorrectly deemed to be lying, then we would be punishing a real victim. If the accuser is lying and faces punishment for admitting the lie, then they are less inclined to confess that they were lying. I do believe that if an accuser is proven to have lied about an accusation like this, then they should face punishment, but the proof should be conclusive. If they admit to it, then I think the best…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:22 AM
3

Oh, man... I don't know what to say. That's awful. I'm so sorry to hear that. My heart goes out to you man. I hope you've got folks around you who will listen and support you. You have my sincere condolences.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:16 AM
2

NPR had the same basic article http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/04/22/474888854/suicide-rates-climb-in-u-s-especially-among-adolescent-girls . In their article, they completely sidestep the fact that men commit suicide at 3 to 5 times the rate that women do. They don't mention male suicide rates at all. They do include a graph for women's suicide rates by age, but nowhere do they seem to give any attention to the people suffering the most.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:34 AM
1

It's a fair point. But, look. CHS is just using the info she has. Maybe the statistics she has are misleading her; maybe she hasn't considered the counterpoints that you all have pointed out. But does this mean that we need to turn on her? Are we going to turn on girlwriteswhat if she ever references statistics that turn out to be incorrect? I mean, the real line of reasoning here is CHS sited a dubious statistic, that she knew was dubious, in order to justify an agenda, while pretending to care…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:39 PM
1

I'm curious to see how many men live in actual poverty, but are not reported as such because of alimony or child support. Something tells me that the number is not nearly as big as you might think. Are there men who fit this demographic? I bet so. Are there enough men who fit this demographic to unbalance the scales? I doubt it. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2014/figure6.pdf
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:38 PM
1

Because the poverty line is well above homelessness. The most poor people in our country may well be men. The 5%, 10%, 20% of the poorest people may all be men, I don't know. But, according to the census data, when you take all of the people who fall below the poverty line and arrange them by gender, there are more females in the group. You can poke holes in this; I'm not defending their methods or the completeness of the census. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2014/figur…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:36 PM
1

No need to be snide. How do you know that it excludes the homeless? Also, why should it include those in prison?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:32 PM
1

https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2014/figure6.pdf
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:31 PM
4

Yes, and this exact reason is why statistics that rely on complex models like income are hard to really pin down. We're just trying to find out who is having trouble making ends meet - we latch onto the word "poverty", but the devil is in the details; what does "poverty" mean, and how do we measure it? As you say @girlwrietswhat. But, in order for us to weigh just how this changes the equation, we'd need numbers. How many women who qualify as poor receive child support? How many poor women get s…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:29 PM
1

I'm a huge fan of CHS, so I was interested in this video. Here is my read of it. First off, Rush Limbaugh has nothing to do with this so what the fuck are you talking about? Secondly, you are using guilt by association; CHS was a feminist when she was younger, there were feninists at that time that said shitty things, and you're blaming her for things she didn't say. The third claim that this video takes issue with is that "the poverty roles are still disproportionately filled with women and chi…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:37 PM
1

sillymod, I know that this is a conversation from a long time ago, and maybe I shouldn't bother revisiting it, but I just now saw your reply and I wanted to take a second to address it. A straw man argument is when you represent an opponent's stated position as something that it is not, and then attack the weaker argument as if it was the opponent's actual position. I suggested that women be found guilty of DUI at lower blood alcohol levels. I said this because when looking at alcohol and women,…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:39 PM
3

I would be just as disappointed if it were the other way around. Bias based off of gender is wrong. I hope that this study makes teachers aware so that they can shake free from that bias. If you get the right answer, you should get the same exact credit whether you are female or male or whatever.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:08 PM
1

Those "reasonably competent" drivers at 0.10 should go to jail.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:29 AM
1

True. But, I am bringing this up to illustrate the flaws in the reasoning. I am saying "If what you say is true, then doesn't that mean...".
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:28 AM
1

I agree to an extent. However, the assertion is that women become incapable of consent after getting drunk. Men retain that capability. I am assuming that there is not a consent center of the brain that is affected more strongly in females, rather that decision making is done more or less whole-brained. If my assumptions are true, then the argument is that the whole-brain of females is affected while drinking in a way that does not occur in males. Thus, females - being more susceptible to the in…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:27 AM
3

great article!
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:40 AM
2

Yes, but these rules are also in place. It may be ok by their internal standards, but according to the administration that came up with these rules, if the touching is unwanted, it is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:32 PM
2

So, if the campus police saw a student breaking the law, and the student did not want to be touched or stared at... is arresting them or watching their behavior sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:22 PM
6

Don't students stare at teachers for hours every day?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:21 PM
1

Actually, I don't think it is clear cut at all. If someone I thought was sexy came up and grabbed my crotch, I don't think I would be upset at that at all. I would probably defend their right to have done that, even if it was very forward. The distinguishing factor is how you feel about it. If you feel bad, then it was wrong for them to do it. If you feel good, then it is not harassment.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:20 PM
3

This is a great article!
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:35 PM
1

Ripley is a broken woman in the beginning. She has PTSD and recurring nightmares. She is totally shattered and the company dangles the promise of a new life in front of her. She decides to face her fears. On the way, she is introduced to the macho marines, who look capable and powerful and strong. There is a scene in the extended cut where Hudson brags about how deadly they are (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhP7XzA8WI8), but look at how everything falls apart in the face of the aliens, and ho…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:39 PM
1

I really never considered it, but it's absolutely true that Aliens is my favorite movie of all time, and that movie is entirely about motherhood. The extended cut has the part about her daughter, which makes her attachment to Newt more understandable and meaningful. It's about a woman who is shattered and terrified, cut off from everything she's ever known, lost in a universe that has moved on without her and the one chip she is forced to play is her familiarity with the Aliens. It's a genius st…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:24 PM
2

I would hope that the MRM has a much wider, more egalitarian tent than feminists. Perhaps there are some who fall into the same trap that feminists have - focusing exclusively on the rights of one gender relative to the other. However, I would hope that MRA's have seen that mistake for what it is and would see themselves as true egalitarians more than as advocates for men to the exclusion of all other oppressed groups. That being said, I completely support transgendered people of all varieties a…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:23 AM
2

"Tampon Run is a side-scrolling 8-bit game that features a girl who throws tampons at oncoming enemies." Did I miss something, or are all the enemies men? Does that mean that men = enemies?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:51 AM
1

I think that labels are our problem. There is a giant swath of feminists who honestly want to fight the good fight and reach equality for all. There is just as big of a chunk of MRA's who want the exact same thing. The only thing holding us back from uniting and fixing inequality is our banners. When you have labels like feminist and MRA, you've created an in-group/out-group paradigm. If you are one, then you fixate on the differences in the other, and that's just a recipe for conflict. If every…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 03:23 AM
9

This is like an incredibly niche mental illness. In essence, she is suggesting that her past has removed from her the ability to say no in certain situations. Honestly, I can imagine something like this being legit. The problem is that it is irresponsible to be drinking around people who might possibly have a sexual interest in her while she suffers from this. It is almost like having a compulsion to start fires and going into a fireworks store. Her condition puts other people who are not aware …
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:42 AM
1

Thanks for the help. I'm still finding my footing.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter