TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A__dam Archive

View 2 posts and 31 comments by A__dam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I think a lot of conservatives realised this during the 2016 election, the same thing happened then when suddenly some select subs stopped appearing on /r/all every day or so.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:38 PM
3

It has the same motive behind censorship, but instead of actually censoring your free speech they're being outright biased. I disagree with you so I'm going to take away your right to free speech I disagree with you so I'm going to take your children away and be sexist. Fucking hell, this sub is becoming more liberal by the day. We should never let someone fall victim to the false ideology of feminism and anti-men sexism.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:35 PM
1

Kill it with fire
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:07 PM
6

he wasn't facing a threat. Wrong. She was armed with a glass bottle and attempted to use it as a weapon and would have had she not been subdued. She also wasn't attacking anyone else at the time. Wrong, she was throwing glass bottles throughout the day. She was also carrying weighted gloves. Are you suggesting that she was completely harmless and peaceful? She literally had a glass bottle in her hand, what did you expect. He attacked her. Self defence. This is also /r/pussypassdenied so don't bo…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 06:46 PM
1

Someone gets it.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:30 PM
20

It's literally a terrorist organisation - "Using violence for political gain"
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 10:33 AM
38

Isn't that like saying a school shooter is a victim because he was shot by the police after killing a bunch of kids?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 10:31 AM
2

a male superior providing strict orders may be "appropriate strictness" but coming from a female superior it may be "bitchy-ness". See, I disagree with that. If my manager decides to be strict to the point of lack of respect, then yeah, I would judge that as him being a dickhead. If my manager was a woman, then I would think the same thing - I, along with most people, don't judge someone by their gender, only by their individual characteristics. It boils down to respect, really. Regarding the wa…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/17 05:33 PM
1

So what downsides do women face? Care to elaborate?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:45 PM
2

Meh, fortunately people age and in the coming decade, Generation Z, the most conservative and anti-PC generation in a while, will be unleashed upon the political world which was formerly filled with feminists and political correctness. It's come in a full loop if anything, people are starting to notice the bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:07 PM
3

That's not the point. Currently most people don't even know about it. Whilst it may have no political significance it brings the attention to the day that it deserves.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 09:14 PM
10

Meh, I like to think that that isn't the case sometimes and the people working there are actually normal people who aren't affected by the SJW brainwashing. But obviously this is the case with many companies such as Apple, Google, and many media outlets. Perhaps a bloke will read one of the emails and think 'yeah, that's a good idea', but that probably won't happen. Worth a try though, the more requests we send, the more likely they will put something through.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:47 PM
1

People will still support International Women's day regardless of whether I celebrate it or not. The point isn't tearing down women's day, the point is getting equilibrium for the two celebrations. If we blindly keep following women's day with little regard for men's day, then an equilibrium won't be achieved. The idea is not bringing down international women's day, it's bringing up international men's day. It isn't even much of a celebration though, it's about recognition. The vast majority jus…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:21 PM
1

I'm not suggesting that we tear down their day - they deserve it equally as much as we do. But I personally cannot celebrate women's day if they refuse to celebrate ours. It's like saying 'Hey fuck you you're shit' to the local council, then expect to get benefits and free council housing from them after saying that. The council will be more reluctant to do so after being disrepected. I'm all for the equilibrium of celebration, but promoting one gender's celebration whilst saying 'fuck you' to t…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:49 PM
2

So we should just stand by and accept that "Yeah, we should celebrate women because they deserve to be and all, but I couldn't care less about the men who also deserve to be celebrated". An eye for an eye. Yes, this is true, and I will accept that this is true because this is gender. We're supposed to be equal. This isn't just two kids on the playground who want to punch each other. Imagine both children are equally wrong - should one child be forced to get punched and made fun of whilst the oth…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:12 PM
3

It is outright male hating. If they feel uncomfortable walking in front of men, then screw them, you can't get into trouble for walking behind someone. If they feel uncomfortable, if anything, it is them who should move out of the way, not this whole ideology that men should always serve to women whenever they call for it.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:15 PM
3

I never said man up at all bud No, but that's basically what's implied through the idea of "ignore the shit we get, deal with it, now celebrate women because they deserve to be celebrated". I know not all women are out to get us, my point in the OP was that the negative effects come from the lack of recognition, not the hate for men. Sure the rhetoric is women are underprivileged compared to males and that can only change with time. Women have very similar privileges to men. If anything, they're…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:12 PM
5

How can I celebrate international women's day if I know that the many issues faced by men aren't recognised and the great achievements we have made aren't celebrated, whilst going out and saying "Yay to women!". You pretty much expect me to just 'man up' and 'stop being a little bitch and celebrate women'? We get snubbed on a lot of shit, but that doesn't get nearly as recognised as much as these """issues""" such as 'manspreading', the 'wage-gap' and other bullshittery. I can't simply stand by,…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:59 PM
3

Not with rape. With 'Sexual Assault', which is not treated in any way as severely as rape.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:50 PM
6

The problem is with the whole thing is that there isn't a legitimate reason for the average woman to go on strike. They're not achieving anything and there's nothing to achieve. The whole thing is bullshit, and it will come to nothing when it falls into Trump's office. I sincerely hope that the average working woman doesn't buy this.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 04:06 PM

She admitted to making the whole thing up. Just as a side note, a false allegation can still mess up a man's life. At least in the UK, anything like this, even if admitted to be fake and all completely false, it still remains on someone's record. There was a guy in my area who was a teacher - he was falsely accused of a sexual crime (can't remember what), and the girl admitted to making the whole thing up. He had to leave the school later due to personal reasons, but apparently finding work was …
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:35 PM
1

We need to do a march/strike a few days later, then the average person will notice the dramatically greater impact on society the second strike has. This is getting ridiculous, and it's almost identical to the sort of leftist brainwashing that was happening during the election.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:00 PM
2

I hope that the coverage of whatever happens only emphasises the ridiculous male-female gap in the public service sector. I don't believe that it should be 50/50, because that's just irrational, but rather should be proportional to the number of unqualified, semi-skilled people by gender.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:58 PM
78

This woman needs to be locked up. If she's ready to literally destroy a man's life over her hatred for his sister, then she deserves to be punished herself. These people are the scum of society, and in many cases they've gotten away with a simple slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:52 PM
9

But in comparison, this is a petty crime. It shouldn't be too difficult to find a decent picture of the lad. I'd call out the news source for this case, personally.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:49 PM
3

I know what 'most' means lol. But I guess they're mostly meant to be sarcastic to highlight the bullshit that men have to put up with. I think a few of these should be vice versa, ie. we illegalise male genital mutilation for example.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:53 PM
4

Most?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 01:29 PM
1

That's not the point. Is there any valid evidence of the mod team NOT being compromised though? We don't know anything other than a mod post by an account which was potentially compromised.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 07:24 PM
1

There's a difference between falsely accusing someone of rape and trolling a bunch of people. Hell, we don't even know if PPD HAS been compromised, for all we know the mod accounts have been taken over and they just tried playing it off as a doxx troll. It's just the nature of such an event, you can't always take someone's word for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 06:49 PM
1

'Women' is a general statement. This is generalisation because it is true. By no means did they say ALL women are abusive in ALL circumstances. There are always exceptions, so the term women would generally apply to over 50% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 06:46 PM
2

This. Don't overlook it, trust me.
/r/askTRP30/01/17 06:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter