TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A_for_Anonymous Archive

View 8 posts and 213 comments by A_for_Anonymous on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What every American government does regardless of party.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:38 PM
20

Came here to say this. War is about cheap oil, MIGA, guys with USSR fetishes and especially about making the military industrial complex rich. Somebody else does the "defend democracy", "denazify", "fight for honour", "for a tomorrow" and whatever bullshit they tell 18 year old men to get them to go get killed for their interests. I'd only ever fight to defend my wife and kids; that includes two women: one is a trad wife, not a blue-haired regard nobody would ever marry, and the other one is a c…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 08:47 AM
3

Ugly women have it only marginally better. The truth is it matters a lot how you look, women are a lot more picky about looks for men, and people feel empathy for women but not for men. Including men. Then you have other factors like competitiveness or, in the case of idiots, idpol, but you don't want to talk or deal with blue haired regards anyway so pretend these don't exist; they're trouble anyway. Let's talk about normal people. Here's how to make it better: looksmax. Don't just be a respect…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 08:25 AM
25

I routinely avoid and ignore women with funny coloured hair. It seems to be an indicator for trouble.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:34 AM
3

Finally, some sanity. I will start considering WMT stock. Without DEI/ESG stupidity, it seems they are a company who cares only for talent in any shape and colour, which means it will perform better.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 01:55 PM
17

It's simple - I use the term feminazi because it irks radical feminists, wokegards and politically correct regards in general. The fact it's a good fit for authoritarian feminism and the new wave of "I'm offended" censorship and cancel culture we're subject to is a plus. But I primarily want to make sure blue haired regards seethe at my thoughts and opinions.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:22 AM
1

It's just an idpol scheme.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:25 AM
9

I'm so glad Harris lost basing her strategy on idpol 100%. Vote for me because I have a pussy, vote for me because I'm black (which is not even true but hey, woke crap doesn't have to make sense anyway).
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:12 AM
18

And if they don't, it'll be their loss - zero fucks given. They're making their lives miserable by making the wrong choice; actions carry consequences so I don't need to care about it provided information to do better is available.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:09 AM
41

Yup, this is fine. They're refusing to be intimate with the men who don't want to be with these bottom of the barrel, blue haired, zero value women who are often petty, ugly and insufferable even outside of politics. If anything, it saves a normal man the trouble of falling for any of these regards. They will restrict themselves (in theory, maybe only in theory) to the white knighting omega nu-males feminism has bred - males these ugly women are not at all attracted to. What this 4B movement is …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:07 AM
5

Telling the truth? I won't. Ever. Redditor for 11 days, negative karma... you're glowing, JIDFnoggin.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:39 AM
6

Because in this case, what Israel wants is to expand its ethnostate.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:19 AM
0

I agree Hamas, which by the way was created by Israel, are just a bunch of murderers and cowards. But that doesn't mean I must take a side as the media want (I wonder why are the media so invested in this). I won't side with murderers or with a stolen country on a genocidal rampage to build its ethnostate.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:15 AM
7

I can understand women, monkeys, monitor lizards, etc. hating men it in India
/r/MensRights02/11/24 06:12 AM
2

Low sex drive need not apply (I wish, but people still make the mistake of getting into a relationship with sexual incompatibility)
/r/MensRights31/10/24 08:44 AM
20

*Over 33 need not apply
/r/MensRights30/10/24 05:35 PM
17

In the end what happens is that when women are done getting fucked silly by Chads and want a keeper, they join the free market where both sexes look for keepers, and what usually happens is that the market is saturated, meaning "the good ones are taken" applies to both sexes at that point. They won't be able to find what they want because they're too low value and didn't make a good investment early on. The good investment is what they could make on a man that's good value, but doesn't know it/i…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 05:30 PM
62

This. It's just cultural revenge. Feminists are not about equality, they are about doing the same oppression again, but against men.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:01 PM
6

We can safely ignore this scum and the media she works for, and others like the owners of that media, pretend blue haired regards don't exist and live our lives avoiding, as much as possible, all interaction, and of course any service or kindness, towards any militant feminists/misandrists like these and their nu-male white knights. And of course, never stick our dicks in crazy; let them go lez or have to fuck the omega orbiter woke nu-males they are not attracted to.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:13 AM
2

Like they have anything to do. But the ones making it so that only their ideas are acceptable and everything else must be censored are the wokegards. They are full of hatred and seethe at everything; their karma is that their life will always suck and we can just ignore all the blue hair for the most part, and try not to interact with them.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:05 AM
5

Good job. I'm also teaching mine to be responsible for her own life and decisions, and what's more likely to be safe and successful. Just like I tell her it's a lot less likely to lose a limb or get killed in a car over a bike, I'm teaching her what types of guys to avoid, such as the ones that think she's inferior from their very religions.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 07:47 AM
3

Yup, he's desperate, not very clever, and also wants his "good person" licence.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 07:45 AM
13

And I can't wait to see what this brings, and what's even better, how blue haired regards seethe.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:29 PM
3

You have to be liked by wokegards. Be dark-skinned, autist, female, trans, gy9sy, convict, religion of peace or 17.9-years old doctor/engineer/lawyer migrant, among other "vulnerable" identities. In your case, they may still call you something something patriarchy something something and get all female-dog because they hate white men more than they love gays. Woke best regards are so full of hatred their capacity to turn the world as horrible as they see it knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:57 PM
2

Do you have any other "poor victim" identity now? Being gay alone, I don't know, I think blue haired regards would still find hatred for you if you're white, a guy and not fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:28 PM
2

Nope, they just predict a human-looking sequence of words, one at a time. That apparent reasoning emerges from their sheer size and quality of the predictions, predicting what a reasoning human would have written. It's a prediction, though, of what a human would have said; of what comes next. That's the one thing the LLM neural network is trained on, and the one thing it does: after "the quick brown fox jumps", there goes "over". After "the quick brown fox jumps over", there goes "the". That's a…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 04:41 PM
-1

And I don't agree with what the censored poster said or thought, but I'm not a fear grimacing nu-male about it, I stand for free speech and I won't try to change the world where it doesn't matter, which is by getting best regards on Reddit censored. This is just childish and ineffective. In other words, wow, look at that, he got his post deleted for wrongthink, that will teach him! finger clap finger clap rise fist tip fedora
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:15 PM
10

Correct.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:27 AM
34

People will be like "cheer up, I wish I was you".
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:56 AM
25

Feminists are all about being equals except when they aren't, e.g. with prisons. They should be mixed-sex and people should treat everyone the same. It's sad how we depend on criminals to give pedos what they deserve and prevent it from happening again because our system is absolute shite, but this should be happening with female pedos as well.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:55 AM
28

That's LLMs. They just predict the next word in order for text to sound human-written. LLMs are trained on crap like Reddit, then further pozzed and made "safe and responsible" during finetuning, so they write like a patronising, blue-haired Californian best regard. Not the type of AI you can use for judging, but in all cases it depends on training. These AIs will be as good or bad as their developers, therefore let me make an educated guess...
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:52 AM
-11

OMG! You r-r-reported a posted on Reddit? You badass.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:49 AM
7

I mean, it's ADL. It's all like that. It's a bullshit hate group with an agenda playing the nazi card all over. They're an advance group of big media agendas designated by... designated.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 09:14 AM
4

Western women tend to be low value, entitled money grabbers on top of which they hate the men they leech everything from. However, there are: Worthwhile women, hard to find but doable; I managed. Look for non-feminists, perhaps within religious communities. Non-Western women from places where the feminism rot hasn't reached (i.e. move! You don't owe any country anything!) Men, if you're lucky enough to be bi or gay. I don't think it's impossible to find love and intimacy and enjoy life, but you …
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:36 AM
3

No anon, you need to doublethink this correctly. Women are paid less for the same work and men are hired even though they are more expensive while doing the same thing because capitalists hate women more than they love money. Women must be paid more for the same job, and it must be mandatory to hire them.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:36 PM
50

Identity politics Bottom of the barrel, terrible quality politicians Corrupt psychopath in power/commander-in-thief is selling the country and using the communists' votes to stay in power at the expense of more and more bullshit agendas on TV and schools 2030 agenda lab country. The bosses of both the psychopath and his milquetoast useless opposition just want to try pushing the woke agenda more as an experiment to see if people become even dumber and easier to control and grab money from. After…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:14 AM
2

And immoral politicians, the people running the media and so-called philantropists will exploit this and tribal, minority feelings with an evil manipulation scheme called identity politics, a modern cancer.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 07:06 AM
32

But we have to increase NATO budget and sell more weapons! If you're Russian, we have to denazify for the glory of communist USSR! We have to die for Israel because... well because TV says so, alright? We have to free countries with oil to protect democracy so you can exercise your power to vote for Biden or Trump!
/r/MensRights10/03/24 02:15 PM
33

Because women are equal but they get oppressed so we need to shoehorn them into positions even if there are better scored applicants because they're equal and there are not enough female CEO and VP positions but amount of women killing themselves for Biden's military industrial complex or USSR, mining and driving lorries is about right, we need more feminism except there.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 02:09 PM
39

It's taboo if not illegal because it's not convenient for women.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 03:28 PM
3

Yup; it's more of a passive-aggressive joke on feminazism. However, as things stand right now men have to fap, fuck a guy/mare/watermelon or put their freedom at the mercy of the women they fuck and her sanity. If it weren't for the minority of trad women who are not into this insanity, PC shit and feminist shit, I'd root for the black pill and men going their own way. I'm glad at least gay dudes don't have to deal with this bullshit and can just pretend women don't exist except when discriminat…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:51 PM
2

While what you did was great and she deserved it on the grounds her very reason for staying no longer exists, Reddit is a cesspool of SJWs and "woke" cuckgrinning retards, so first of all they side with your ex on the basis that she has tits and is therefore superior, and maybe, just maybe, there's a one in a trillionth chance of losing their white knight virginity by defending everything with tits; second, they think everybody is entitled to gibs and freebies in every developed country, except …
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/21 01:23 AM
3

Hahaha yeah, shitty editing. Was going to say I speak Spanish from Spain, then just Spaniard.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/16 02:57 PM
2

I'm a Spaniard. I have a hard time understanding her, but during the first few minutes she keeps mumbling something that can be roughly translated to "why are you getting mad, pal". She keeps using that word, "wey", I think it means "pal". The news TV said that she crashed trying to avoid hitting a woman with a kid, then tried to run away, crashing into parked vehicles, until the guy she crashed into stopped his car in front of her to prevent her escape. There were three in the car, one of whom …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/16 09:21 AM
2

And this is why you don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:37 PM
2

I agree with most of it, though I don't think anybody needs special protection (as a general rule, prevent violence towards human beings, not just women), and that everybody needs to "man up", men and women, once they're adults. Negative emotions are stupid and won't ever solve any problem, only create them, so instead of helping guys have them, I'd help girls not have them.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:10 AM
9

I love this so much... if there's justice porn, this has to be the extreme fetish series.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/15 06:28 PM
-1

If I do, they won't be pussies, get PTSD from Twitter or get depressed over being attractive, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:43 AM
1

My main issue with it is that she was ugly. I was like "Somebody get this ugly woman away from me".
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:20 AM
1

My post was sarcasm, I believe my worst case scenario made it obvious. In any case this applies to the 99.99% of the cases of non-reciprocated attraction, not the 1 in 10000 where the attracted person wants to rape, murder or invade houses. If shit gets shitty, you tell the police, and I know being a man chances are that you'll be laughed at, which sucks and is the reason why I'm here at /r/mensrights . Nowhere in my posts I referred to stalkers outside romantic interest, that's off-topic. Of co…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:52 PM
-8

Hahaha, we both stand for men's rights, but we have a different approach. Mine is that both women and men need to "man up", suck it up and start behaving like adults rather than becoming victims of objectification and all that feminist bullshit. Being emo or a victim takes you nowhere, being strong and standing for what you think without letting others ruin your life with a compliment about your looks does, and allows you to chill and enjoy the good things of life. I'm egalitarian, and as such I…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:40 PM

No, but I honestly think you can't get scared or freaked out from that. You can be disgusted, but that's all... People should learn to man. Actually learn to person; women should, too. Don't make a big deal out of what's not.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:47 PM
9

Both actually, yeah, puritans make the world ugly and less fun for everyone.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:43 PM
-21

feelings girls want to ride my cock meanies I feel so bad
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:41 PM
-16

Ignoring people long enough works on 100% of cases. Guaranteed. Best case a day, average case a few weeks, worst case until person dies. Edit: Men, stop being such pussies. This comment is obvious comedy, with the worst case scenario it should be pretty obvious I'm being sarcastic. (I'm also being mildly sarcastic with the "pussies" part. I believe I am in Men's Rights, not in /r/bawwfeelingshurt.)
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:32 PM
5

Scared of... somebody, girl or not, liking me? My goodness, I'm terrified just at the thought. I actually did have one creepy (read: not-attracted-to-her (YES "creepy" is the same for girls and guys)) girl like me too much, basic physical contact included, and she was much older too. And to make matters worse I was like 12 and she was like 16. I... s u r v i v e d. Despite what one would think from the Internet, I've got no PTSD, no mental trauma or scars, didn't turn to a psychopath or a disfun…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:19 PM
73

Actually, I think humanity stands a better chance if we overcome all the bullshit "objectification" and "ew sex" introduced by feminist assclowns in the 20th century. What's wrong with being sexual? That's how we're born... out of sex, and into sex. I think both guys and girls should be able to make any funny comments as they please if they like the meat they see... More fun that way. Best case scenario: leads to "You're not bad either", then sex. Worst case scenario: laughs had, no fucks given,…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:46 PM
12

That's the only reason why such an: openly clueless person that's so untalented at managing communities and communicating towards them with a story of scams and scandals and no relevant previous merits that claimed whatever she didn't achieve was not given to her because she has a pussy would ever be remotely considered as a CEO of any remotely serious company. Ellen Pao must have fucked him pretty well and done outrageous things for him in bed. I doubt a wealthy Asian guy couldn't get to fuck p…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/15 08:48 AM
5

Also violent, sexist, racist, lazy, and other fine gypsy culture qualities.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/15 08:07 AM
6

Gypsies can't read.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/15 08:04 AM
7

Actually: Those chavs were trespassing She didn't try to use her pussy pass She should have called the cops and get those idiots kicked out
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 06:38 PM
45

Signed as "SJW", heh.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:52 AM
2

Cutting beautiful long hair should be a crime punishable by law.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/14 04:39 PM
2

I really recommend you to not only study elsewhere, but to abandon that shithole for good. The Land of the Free™ is by far the most misandrist, outrageously insane country in the world, and the only place where pepole are so prejudiced against men, obsessed with sexual harassment and pedophilia, and have so many issues with sexuality and intimacy. The obsession with the political correct insanity is also much stronger, and it's the only country in the world where normal people would take that "t…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:03 AM
2

Age of consent is pretty fucked up pretty much anywhere. Few countries do have ages that make sense. It should also be relative. You can't jail two 12 year old kids for experimenting with each other.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:44 PM
2

saying you hate feminism is saying you do not want equal rights for women. I do want equal rights for everyone, yet I don't like or support the tone and contents from most of today's feminist sources, because they don't stand for equality at all.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:20 AM
0

We call this "joke" or "satire". It's not really offensive except to those people who get offended at anything (their issue, not mine).
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:14 AM
1

It's annoying to be discriminated against by the majority of the western society.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:46 AM
7

Maybe you should have trolled her, made her call the police, and let her make an as out of herself. Either way, be sure to teach your sister not to be a sexist whore once she gets older, and tell her about the things you experienced when she was young.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 12:37 AM
1

Your penis gets hard because of your natural instinct to reproduce. Let's see; besides the female sexual organ, it gets hard at: Ass Monochrome hentai Incest sex stories Lesbians Monochrome hentai about lesbian sisters eating each other's asses Not sure if that's about reproduction :P Sex feels good so that you will do it, so that you will reproduce. That's right — we evolved into sex feeling great. However, I do it wrong. I get the pleasure without actually fucking my life, and do so fully cons…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:15 AM
1

I do understand and agree that in today's society and culture, somehow it's "worse" to be shirtless if you're a woman. I can't understand how's that possible, and I'd love to end with such discrimination (which in this case, clearly works against women) and let people walk around however they desire. Being a guy, I wouldn't feel uncomfortable being shirtless in public, but it also depends on the context — if in the middle of a business meeting I'd feel uncomfortable, completely due to being inco…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:58 PM
0

Even when we don't want babies with our brains, our natural instincts tell us to make babies. Holy crap, man, mine sure don't. Every time I'm shopping and come across one of these shops for pregnant women or babies, I shudder and walk faster. Same goes for my girlfriend. Not that we don't want to have a kid in a distant future — a way to share and extend our DNA and will to power — once we have lived enough and saw the world and are ready to resign from happiness, relax, time together and being …
/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:45 PM
3

I promise that if this was actually females that it would be a far larger issue. I think so — which sucks. I think it's not that big a deal in either case.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:38 AM
4

That's a point related to making babies — women are more valuable for making babies because they make babies — which 99.95% of the time you're having sex you hope won't happen. Until that time in your life comes, if it comes at all, life is about fucking each other's brains out, not about making babies.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 10:40 PM
2

A man's body will never be worth as much as a woman's body. Why? It's just social conditioning. I can picture a different society where women are told to feel womanly, "in" and proper by being sexual and free, but at the same time men are told to feel manly, "in" and proper by rejecting and repressing their sexuality and natural desire to fuck anything that moves (and perhaps some things that don't move as well). Such a society would be equally as disgusting as ours, but in the opposite directio…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:42 PM
10

I'm a person on /r/MensRights and I believe: That either women taking men's shirts off and men taking women's shirts off are both sexual assault, or none. No exceptions, no but-men-have-no-tits, no men-enjoy-that, no man-up. Fuck discrimination. That it's not such a big deal either way. I would make it a minor offense at most — you can't completely outlaw being an asshole; people need to learn to live in a society by themselves, to behave, and to defend, and most importantly, to take life easy. …
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:30 PM
1

I'm a "leftist" as in "not right-wing" (not leftist actually, more like anarchist), and I think this situation could perfectly be real. It sounds real and it's happening all the time. I have no reason to doubt Anonymous on this.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:38 PM
-1

I know no person did this on purpose, but it's offensive and Google should add a rule to prevent this correction. It happened in the past.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:27 AM
1

If he feared for the lives of the children (i.e. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!11), he could have shot his wheels, or used non-lethal weapons, but nah, he's a man, he's probably a rapist pedophile anyways, fuck him :( .
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:01 PM
3

There is much less of a chance of it happening if it is a woman Which makes it a matter of sexism.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:00 PM
3

I seriously doubt the cop would have shot if it had been a woman driving.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:31 AM
6

Oh my gawd a MINOR! THINK OF THE CHILDREN! Quick, shut down the Internet! A child is in danger! Old enough to rape, old enough to face consequences. Who cares anyways.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:59 PM
9

Throwing away two young lives because of a single (bad) mistake is not justice No, man. A mistake is what happens when you take the wrong turn, delete the wrong file, or dial the wrong number. Taking a person and beating, humiliating and raping him is deliberate evil. People shouldn't be getting away with "oops, I accidentally tortured/raped/murdered somebody, won't happen again, no bad feelings lol". Nevertheless, don't worry. They won't get 40 years. Since they are female, chances are that the…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:55 PM
4

tl;dr: it's ok to chop part of your dick off if you would want that.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:57 PM
3

Victim blaming (and everything else) is ok as long as they're men.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:52 AM
1

Personally, I think everyone makes such a big deal and fuss out of this stupid shit. Neither men nor women should get jail time for groping adults' genitals, for goodness sake. It's just something that may be disgusting or not. Last time I checked, being disgusting is not illegal. Puritan societies make a bigger deal of it than they should. I'm sure a man would have been in serious shit in his situation though, because of our sickly sexist society, but my position is not that the woman should ha…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:53 PM
2

I emailed [email protected] with the subject [APPLICATION] <made up female name> following text: This Gnome Women programme is awfully, shamefully sexist and discriminates against my sex (male). Thanks for once again making me feel like the butt end of the society. I'm not being an asshole; I'm genuinely offended and experiencing negative feelings because of this. Next time be sure to see if you can discriminate against my race too — it usually happens with these politically correct agend…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 12:42 PM
3

I prefer standing: Faster. No need to touch things (most useful when I'm not home), no risk of touching things with my mini-me. Can play with it. I'm a cleaner. I don't believe manliness has anything to do with my preference; I'm a man regardless of how I pee. If I were to sit, I'd sit like a man.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 03:02 PM
2

Rampant sexist against males. As a male, he's presumed rapist and pedophile until proven otherwise by everyone, soccer moms, stupid dads near their stupid wives and stupid so-called "justice" systems.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 06:35 AM
24

I absolutely agree. Our corrupt society and law think women can't be sex offenders and are just <insert retarded excuse here, like confused or joking or whatever>, while men in that position would be jailed and socially lynched. Men or women, I don't think the kind of thing from the picture is a big deal. People, especially Americans, tend to flip over any trace of sexuality remotely related or connected to anybody under 18, they really go batshit insane about it. Think of the children! As it tu…
/r/MensRights19/08/11 09:21 AM
10

A feminist is one calling herself (or himself) feminist, like the scum that writes these articles. Why don't you pay a visit to /r/feminisms and articles or posts written by most active feminists with an open mind, and see for yourself whether they are egalitarian or not. Once you do, you'll feel embarrassed to call yourself a feminist again. Alternatively, think of it this way: why not call yourself simply egalitarian if you are such? Why do you use a specifically female prefix to describe your…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:45 PM
7

Probably /r/equality too.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:37 PM
23

No true Scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:37 PM
2

No wonder they are "babby crazy": nobody in his right mind would start a serious relationship (yielding babby) with them, which makes them even crazier.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:29 PM
13

Nice no true Scotsman fallacy. A large number of people calling themselves feminists are sexist.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:27 PM
2

If so, there's nothing stopping men from doing it as well (as far as I know). Wrong. If men did this and it was men-only, they'd be socially, economically and even physically lynched by today's feminazi society. It's simply unacceptable to do something for the sole benefits of men (though not the opposite).
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:54 PM
3

The coward deleted his post, but here is it.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:52 PM
2

That older guy with the bike digger is smart. A professional hooker, especially one giving you the "girlfriend experience", would cost far more.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 12:11 AM
0

It also degrades me as a homo sapiens that feminists claim to be the same species; may I sue so I can get a new car?
/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:16 AM
1

Don't understand why the kid killed himself rather than talking to authorities or running away. As for the girl, I almost expect court to forgive her because she was "confused".
/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:10 AM
1

corporation executives must be half male / half female, political positions must be half male / half female, etc. This is about the stupidest idea ever. Let's give people jobs according to their sexual organs, not according to their skills, woohoo! It's also a disgrace for the previous minority at the job, because everybody will think they got the job just for having a pussy, or a dick, or whatever incredibly powerful and smart criterion you decide. And while you're at it, I'll ask that exactly …
/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:05 AM
1

I think restrooms shouldn't be discriminatory, by sex or anything else, otherwise I'll want a tall straight white brown-haired male restroom.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 01:29 AM
1

I'm unsure how the laws are sexist towards men, if the majority of the laws are written by men. Laws are written by people who are businessmen, sellouts, and/or douche bags who want "progress" for any bizarre, fatally flawed definition of "progress" talking anything into account and ignoring everything else — often for the sole reason of getting more votes in order to steal more money. The fact they are written by men says nothing about who are they going to favour; politicians will do anything …
/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:04 AM
7

Do you hate women? Not at all. I do greatly dislike feminist women, for the current de facto definition of feminism which means one who discriminates against people based on genre. I also despise today's laws, which are shamefully, outrageously sexist against men. I want equality. Did you develop your views because you've been burned in the past? Not at all. I enjoy a great relationship with the woman of my dreams and I've never been in a really shitty one, I have not been married (nor I'm going…
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:47 PM
0

I think all young males go through a "white knight" phase. I'm going to agree with this too. As far as I can recall I always wanted men and women to be treated as equals, and didn't like to be called a feminist (even after having been given the "feminism means equality" bullshit) because I don't like any -ists. That I did well. But that's all I did well. Before growing wiser and rethinking everything from scratch, I accepted the common views of my culture with regards to the "women with children…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 08:28 AM
2

I call bullshit. He should have Bel Aired it at the end; it would have been more credible. First of all, he's a man. If we're to assume he got out of this fine, we're already playing a very lucky card. Second, there's the fact that it's Australia, and he showed a vid of a 17 year old girl blowing some cock. Even if she were 17.999999 years old and a whore with a huge gaping vagina the size of a hallway, it'd be a case of "think of the children". Those lawyer motherfuckers would get him rotting i…
/r/MensRights30/04/10 07:01 PM
1

Even if the story were true, her being stupidly irrational wouldn't be an excuse for her claim of rape. She deserved every bit of it, even if the protagonist was kind of an asshole, the difference being that he didn't try to get the cock sheath in legal trouble, jail and shame. He was in his right to be an asshole.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 06:52 PM
16

Don't mutilate your kid's dick. It's his, not yours; if he wants to mutilate it (which is extremely unnecessary and extremely silly for a number of reasons stated elsewhere), allow him to take that decision by himself when he's old enough, and don't campaign for mutilation. You don't own him, you just take care of him. This goes for pets too. I feel like his life would be .001% easier if he was circumcised. A supposed 0.001% improvement wouldn't justify undoable body alteration. On top of that, …
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:47 AM
4

Our feminist society make it as if every man is Homer Simpson.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:46 AM
3

Political correctness in scientific development is, like always, fucking everything up. Men and other political correctness butt-ends will get less attention than necessary out of plain discrimination (under the oxymoron known as """positive""" discrimination), and ironically, non-whites and other political correctness beloved groups will often not be studied properly either because it's unacceptable to think different people could require different treatment or suffer from different things.
/r/MensRights15/02/10 01:03 PM
1

b doesn't exist and will likely never exist. B may unfortunately not be recognized by law in some parts of the world, but it does exist in my brain and passes my moral approval, and I would definitely push for this choice if I were in a position of power. As for e), that's a different issue. Nothing can be done to prevent this, but should the state ever learn from this condition, the mother should be heavily fined or jailed for a short time.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:08 PM
1

The problem is that the child gets the rights upon birth. I don't see it this way.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 08:59 PM
1

Oh, so the tumour doesn't have rights! We agree on this one. Since it doesn't have rights, the guy can easily opt out without disregarding the rights of anything.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:20 PM
1

Well, I say this different kind of sex exists in all cases (even cock up vag) and implies that accidents must be cleaned before it's too late (before they get rights), and there are four possible courses of action: a) They agree to let the accident evolve into a wanted kid. b) The woman wants it but the man doesn't so he opts out. c) The man wants it but the woman doesn't. In this case, it's understandable that the woman decides because she's the one with the tumour. At best she could agree to o…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:17 PM
-1

practice safe sex No such thing. You should know this, if you claim to have that much experience. with a woman who is on birth control and actually willing to have an abortion Can't tell and can't legally bind to.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:14 PM
1

Okay, so let's give rights to semen and rocks too. Don't masturbate or use anticonceptives, you're murdering potential babies! Think of the children!
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:12 PM
1

I'm the first to claim non-human living beings have their rights, and support that highly conscious life, from mice to humans, should share the same basic rights including the right to live and the right to not be owned (which would make all of us vegans; I'm ok with it). However, the rights of those alive should prevail over the rights of something that's not highly conscious, just like your rights should prevail over the rights of a plant should you need to eat it.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 06:12 PM
1

I'm willing to agree that the child has his rights... once he exists. But until that, it's just a pack of cells or tumour with the potential to become a child. If we're going to give rights to potential matter, then I'll argue that you need to give rights to rocks because its atoms may one day be part of a child, and if the Universe is deterministic, it may be so for sure.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:33 PM
1

True. But this is incorrect. It's not a child. The child doesn't yet exist.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:30 PM
1

You don't like men to opt-out/abandon/whatever you want to call it. Problem is, I do. I respect your choice whatever it is, but please respect others'.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:29 PM
1

Bill Gates has no connection with the child. The father does. Do we seriously want to argue on these lines? It depends; are we in for the "best for the kid" or not? As usual, this kind of proposal ignores the most important part of the whole equation: The child. No worries, he doesn't yet exist.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:26 PM
0

Not 100% safe, and not 100% undoable. Your views on this issue will basically make men asexual or homosexual, or fuck asses, mouths, hands, feet and armpits at best.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:25 PM
1

No. Sex is about fucking brains out, coming multimple times, fucking asses, engaging in all sorts of weird fetishes and fun, and sometimes, just a very few times if any in your life, it's about reproduction. If sex were just the act of reproduction, what would you say about anal sex or homo sex?
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:23 PM
0

THEN IT'LL BE HER CHOICE TO RAISE THE KID ALONE BECAUSE THE FATHER DOESN'T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIM.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:21 PM
1

Once he's he, i.e. once he's born, or in the very least once his brain starts working (week 11 IIRC), surely.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:20 PM
1

Dude, I've slept with more women than you. You have no way to tell. My views are hardly middle ages. Yet you think you are forced to support or take custody for whatever crap came out of how many women you had sex with? The right belongs to the child. There's no child. It's a fetus at best.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 04:02 PM
1

So women have a right, and men do not. Uh... which subreddit are we at?
/r/MensRights11/02/10 03:57 PM
1

You said it: some. Don't force on others what you like yourself.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 03:55 PM
-2

He can't be unmade once born.... That's why this needs to be done while it's not a functional human being. The sperm is no longer yours Okay, then I should have no rights derived from what it does. but once it fertilizes an egg in her body you don't have any say. This kind of policy makes me want to chop my dick off. I don't think men would be kicking and screaming into court if they were given a fair shake in court. If we are equals and have 50/50 custody, no one should be paying any party chil…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 03:55 PM
1

Good points. Like I said elsewhere, I think it'd be rightful to make the guy pay for the cost of an abortion should it be not free in the country where they live, should he opt out. No, I am not talking about fraud or entrapment, because there is no evidence to suggest to me that fraud is more common than a simple accident where the pregnancy is not intentional. If fraud can be proven, the woman should get jail time and the guy should be immediately freed from all consequences.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:46 AM
1

I'd be willing to agree to a one-time fee with the cost of the abortion if it's not free in their country, and a restraining order as well as information protection (the guy not being able to know any personal details of the kid, including name and sex).
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:40 AM
2

Quick, let's make a law against that. Men should be drafted and forced to date poor single women. LoveDolls and tgirls who don't end up in men supporting women need to be banned.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:30 AM
4

Do not want :)
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:29 AM
1

A civilized society allows abortion, they don't force it. Giving a father his rightful choice of opting out of parenthood doesn't mean the woman is forced to abort. And the smart ones will just start dating women who give blowjobs and love anal. Only to spit or shit the cum and stuff it up their vags. Happened recently to somebody famous. Or they will have the talk about BC before engaging in sex... and have the abortion talk and not fuck women who don't believe in abortion. Not a good thing if …
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:29 AM
1

They are abandoned by the mother if she gets rid of the parasite before it's too late, yet you don't seem to have a problem with this.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:23 AM
1

Why keep the fucking kid? You can't just shove him up somebody's ass when he doesn't want him.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:22 AM
1

Okay, so why do you take that right away from fathers?
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:21 AM
0

You see it this way because your views on sex are those of the middle ages. Recreational sex is a widely recognized right and should be wherever it isn't. Opting out doesn't happen when you have sex, it happens when you have an accident. You can opt out of the consequences — either the womb or the money.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:21 AM
1

But why do you want to have the fucking kid at all cost? What if the guy doesn't want him? You're shoving it up his ass, pissing on his free will, out of an accident which could have been fixed.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:13 AM
1

It's not a matter of responsibility if they didn't even want the kid, and it can be aborted. Having sex is not baby making; it may have been so 200 years ago but it's definitely not what people want now 99.9% of the times they have sex. Whatever accident happens after it, it must be dealt with as an accident.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:11 AM
1

If the solution involves removing the child from both parents, then both parents have to agree on it. I agree with this. Then again, if the woman is going to risk her life giving birth to yet another human in an overpopulated, devastated, overexploited, polluted world to cause yet more overpopulation, devastation, depletion and pollution, and maybe crime as well, when both parents are uninterested on him, I suggest the woman equally risks her life with an abortion.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:09 AM
1

But if you want more rights, and answer is not to take away the rights of others. All I really want is the right to choose whether I'll be the father or not, i.e. whether I'll support the kid or not. It's not the right of others to force me to pay for things I don't want. I don't need that women get forced to abort. But they shouldn't get one cent from the father if he doesn't want to be the father. As long as the guy isn't fucked up with kid support, she can have whatever she wants out of her w…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:02 AM
2

Okay, so if it's not my body, then it's not my money once the kid is born. You want to make me pay over something that's not mine and I have no decision over.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 08:59 AM
1

What's Bill Gates got to do with it? He meant that if you're going to play the "best for the kid" card, the best thing for the kid would be to force any rich man to give heaps of gold to him, not a random poor guy who doesn't even want him. And about that 'unequal abortion law', how do you propose to break a tie? If one parent wants an abortion and the other doesn't? One parent gets the kid and gets to pay 100% of it. Just as if I want a videogame my brother doesn't: I get to pay the full of it;…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 08:42 AM
1

It's not a human being yet. It can be aborted. If we're in for the potential of being a human being, then we'll end up thinking masturbating and wasting cum is immoral, and I don't want to go back 500 years.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 08:39 AM
13

I don't have a problem with abortion. ...as long as it's the mother's decision.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 05:07 PM
5

Cept if they opt out, that just means the child is dead. No big deal. Except if the father wanted the kid. But what the father wants doesn't seem to matter shit to you.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 05:06 PM
1

The social implications of letting fathers opt out sound so awful that I wouldn't want to ever see legislature passed. The social implications of forcing fathers in when the accident could have been fixed because the mother said so sound so awful that I wouldn't want to ever see legislature passed. Oh, wait :( . If you don't want to be a father, dont fucking have sex. Oh, so the only way to have sex is to be willing to father whatever parasite comes out of it? Well said Mr. Puritan, keep this at…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 05:05 PM
5

It's ridiculous... as long as you wanted the kid. But if it was an accident, the guy has a natural right to decide, out of his free will, whether he wants to be the father or not, just like the mother does, and this right must be awarded because there's a solution to accidents. I'd agree that the father would be forced to be such if there were no fix to the accident, but you can get rid of the still-non-kid before it's too late. From a moral standpoint, you can't just shove responsibility up one…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 04:56 PM
4

I don't know if he's forced by law to support it wherever he lives (if he is, it's a sad place indeed), but from a moral standpoint, I don't see how it would be at the same time required to support it and not his decision to have it.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 03:07 PM
5

Calm down, we all know it's not violence if it's a woman at it. Men are still murderer-rapist-pedophiles.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 11:40 AM
3

Because tradition, trends, fashion, religion and so on are poisons. They poison people's brains so that they will do something just cuz: they attack free will, reason and critical thinking. And for a reason unimportant to me, it became part of our culture that daughters should be worried about dolls, then clothes, and sons should be worried about guns, then cars. While it is true that men and women are more likely to enjoy certain things, our culture creates artificial divisions and role models …
/r/MensRights21/01/10 12:32 PM
3

These fairy tales do use girls in helpless positions because everyone emphatizes more with girls. The wolf ate the girl? Poor thing. The wolf ate the guy? Lol, loser. Get a real man you idiots.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 09:10 AM
6

Some adults created these, and some adults agree to these. Women are cool to kids (kids being the untouchable element in our society for which we're allowed to take out freedom, censor, and so on). Men are evil and kill women.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 09:09 AM
2

That's International Amnesty for you.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 09:07 AM
3

Easy: get an equally socially inept partner and stop worrying about that social shit. With a socially inept partner you'll be spared of so much trouble... no assumptions, no clairvoyance, no chit-chat, no guessing, no shitty social games, just straight-to-the-point. The downside is probably shyness, but there are people who are socially inept (or just socially unwilling/antisocial) and at the same time bold and direct.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 09:06 AM
19

That's because most women care actually more for looks than most men, even though we're made to believe the opposite. Most men are happy with a girl they like as a person and that somehow, for some reason, gets it up, be it because she looks like she's into sex, or because she looks like that girl from school, or because she has a big round ass and the guy just happens to love ass; whatever reason — there's a lot of variety in criteria and almost every woman will be found attractive by some guys…
/r/MensRights21/01/10 08:59 AM
-1

is there anything I should know about the courts/law that might bite me in the ass? Everything. Enjoy your living hell, and remember to get lots of lube. The law is against you. She'll fuck you all over and it'll be perfectly legal. The best you can do is to get an ugly lawyer and hope hers is less ugly / cheaper. Sorry. This is how the world works today.
/r/MensRights23/11/09 01:49 AM
17

Feminists will end up banning anything, except worshipping feminists. But it's not just feminists. It's the whole culture which has cancer. Politically correct cancer. Anything will be offensive to anyone now. My whole existence is offensive, for the sole reason of being male, white, straight and a local; fuck me.
/r/MensRights23/11/09 12:35 AM
1

And won't because she's piss ugly and no guy in his right mind would do that, so she'll need to resort to butch lesbians.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 01:42 PM
0

Yeah, let's have the boys study and develop in a school where you have a completely unrealistic, sexist sample of your local population and will have no female models around. This will teach them equality, and will hopefully solve sexual discrimination through sexual discrimination. Furthermore, it'll make it all easier to understand and interact with woman. This looks like the best idea ever.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 10:37 AM
1

I think they write that sorts of claim to make everyone feel good. Or "average" includes babies and kids. Also, what's the big deal with length? Sure, it looks good, but it's girth what really matters.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 08:04 AM
1

THAT'S A LIE I think about sex every five seconds.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 08:02 AM
5

Please feel free to give me more and/or better stats to add. What a weird way to ask for a buff. *Casts Rage on Zaskoda* ATK+10
/r/MensRights03/07/09 07:29 AM
-2

It is worth it if it's for the lulz. Even here. Even this.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 08:27 AM
4

Let your friend know she has hurt your feelings, that such a thing is possible with males because, surprisingly, they have feelings too, and that her disgusting attitude towards males is sickenly sexist and shameful, as she'd say yours would be if you claimed every woman is there for the money.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 08:19 AM
1

they should leave their religion. Oops. This is forbidden by their religion. And the rest of my points would stand (conditioning, lack of education, never knowing any better) even if they were allowed to leave, which they aren't at all.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 03:28 PM
1

All i will say to that is, religious people define their own religions. This is false and you know it. Muslim women (and most muslim men) never defined how islam should be and never had a chance to change it. They can do whatever they want as long as they stfu when it comes to me. You can keep thinking that, until they come for you. I won't bother to enter yet another worthless discussion with you BTW, so I'll skip the other part because the intent and meaning of my examples was more than clear.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 03:13 PM
1

I said you sound like a feminist. A common way to make an accusation. because a man being jailed is the same as a woman choosing to wear a burqa....lol Yes, it is, in more than a way. Don't laugh if you're clueless and ignorant about the issue. It's their religion/culture. Well then, it's my religion/culture to hang the people who run that religion/culture, as well as the retards who don't want them to stop. Are you letting me alone? You are not a member. The women who are, are. Yes, they saw it…
/r/MensRights29/06/09 03:10 PM
3

Few children actually complain when they are molested, yet we don't allow it. Animals are murdered for thier fur, and it's still wrong even if they can't argue why using human language. Enslaved people of all sexes and races from all around the world are subject to such conditioning and have never ever heard of equality, human rights, or received any education, so they can't possibly know of a better life. The fact they don't complain doesn't make it any fair. If you can't see this, you're just …
/r/MensRights29/06/09 02:52 PM
1

Can't see any. Because you are blind, that's why. You're accusing me of being a feminist just because I happen to share one single thing some feminists say about something that's genuinely unfair. huh? "Let"? Why the fuck not? Then why are here? This subreddit is about unfair things happening in Western cultures. You seem to be perfectly fine with anything. As for this subreddit, i don't see the connection...what exactly are westerners "keeping to themselves" when they want to ban the burqa, whi…
/r/MensRights29/06/09 02:49 PM
2

The amount of reductio ad Hitlerum fallacies you spurt is overwhelming. The hipocresy is even worse. You want to let muslims "keep it to themselves", but you're denouncing something westerners do in this subreddit. Why not let westerners "keep it to themselves" too?
/r/MensRights29/06/09 02:34 PM
3

Far from that. But I'm not an idiot. All I am is fair. Just because I denounce something unfair that is being done to women I'm not going to be a rabid feminist, just like I'm not sexist either when I denounce the grave injustice men are subject to in Western countries. Perhaps what's difficult for you to grasp is that I'm not a fanboy and that it's not all white or all black. Perhaps you could check for my other posts in the MensRights subreddit out. You're not helping our cause if you're being…
/r/MensRights29/06/09 02:27 PM
1

No, all I am is fair. If I were politically correct, I'd claim everything muslims do is alright, like politically correct self-loathing tards do.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 01:42 PM
4

Women choose to wear the burqa. Out of social conditioning, lack of education, and psychological braindamage.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 01:41 PM
2

Who is being "politically correct" now? You are. How? And you are extremely stupid because you believe western bs about the middle east. No, you're the retard because you believe western bs about western bs. What I know about how muslim women live, I know it first hand.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 01:17 PM
2

I wouldn't let nazis wear nazi symbols with the intent of justifying or promoting murder and racism, just like I wouldn't let muslim womenwear muslim clothes with the intent of justifying or promoting sexism and slavery. The difference is that I'm consistent, while you are politically correct.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 01:16 PM
-1

Not that I want to defend feminists, but this is not a problem specific to feminists, but to our modern, decadent, politically-correct, feel-good, happy-wappy, tolerant intolerant, self-loathing Western culture. Foreign cultures, esp. islamic culture, is absolutely untouchable and subejct to no morality whatsoever, while we continue to loathe ours. If christians (note: I'm not a christian, nor a muslim, nor anything) call god "father" and not "mother", they go in an uproar about sexism and polit…
/r/MensRights29/06/09 11:12 AM
1

I'm sure you're the kind that will not allow a guy to wear a T-shirt with a huge swastika in nazi styling and colours.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 10:56 AM
4

True, and I don't want my children to grow up in a Muslim world. Too late. They're fighting with their wombs, and they are already invading us. Unless we force them to quit their sickly practices and murderous fundamentalism when they enter our countries, or kick them away, our children, which will be hopefully free-thinking atheists, will grow up in a world full of and dominated by islamofascists.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 10:55 AM
-1

Lol. All these politically correct happy-wappy fussboxes are the main source of all racial and sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 10:18 AM
-2

Political correctness is AIDS for the society, and today's feminism is just political correctness, affirmative action, so-called ""positive"" discrimination (an oxymoron), and all that retarded western bullshit, but to claim femism marxism and lesbianism is just plain retarded. I'm glad you guys aren't with this kind of bullshit, otherwise I'd start thinking most men really are stupider.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 10:15 AM
1

Wait, what? She's a woman! She could have never killed, much less her own children! I know! He must be the murderer, and is pulling all of this in order to stay unsuspected!
/r/MensRights26/06/09 10:13 AM
3

No, thank you for making an effort to understand the situation. The only way for this injustice to end is through understanding. We will achieve nothing if just a handful of men cry over it on the Internet. We have to make everyone understand what's being done to men in modern society if we want to get it fixed. Women learning about this is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 09:56 PM
2

Is this from personal experience? I haven't got jailed, and live in a country where it slightly less likely to get jailed. However, everybody knows males take risks when asking a co-worker out. Thank today's feminism, lawyers and law-makers. And do you get laid with that attitude? Yes. I have a girlfriend. If you work with a person, have a few conversations with them, find some sort of mutual admiration, then ask them out. I'd take the risk (assuming I didn't already have a girlfriend), but only…
/r/MensRights18/06/09 11:35 AM
2

A compliment beyond her shoes, dress and hair. Asking her out for a drink can get you jailed. (To tell the truth, anything and everything can get you jailed provided with enough money and greasy lawyers, but a male asking a female co-worker out is easy to jail, especially in the most so-called modern, so-called free, politically correct western countries.)
/r/MensRights18/06/09 10:55 AM
1

Hello is ok. But try any "admiring" and you can get jailed if she doesn't like you.
/r/MensRights18/06/09 08:51 AM
0

Tell that to our lawyers and law makers.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:38 PM
3

The ladder theory is pretty true. True. Sad, and true.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:38 PM
3

frankly reading this thread makes me sad for these guys that are too scared to approach women or talk to them out of fear. Well, nobody wants to get jailed, and if the woman you approach doesn't like you, you can get jailed. Furthermore, some feel the need to be socially approved. I don't, but most people on this planet unfortunately do, and the society doesn't approve of men doing, well, anything. And yes, this is society's fault.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:35 PM
10

That's stupid though. I'm a man like others, and I'm angered like others at the grave injustice we're subject to, but just because of that, the last thing I'd do is to start downvoting one of the very, very few women who actually understand how we're being treated like dirt.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:32 PM
5

I believe it was just a Reddit glitch: too many idiots at the same time before smarter people could read and upvote. However, as of now your posts have overall good scoring here. BTW, with regards to the post where you said women are sexual creatures: I believe it's not that what's getting downvoted, but: Admiring is awesome. Harassing, not so much. Read my answer on that if you wonder why some might have downvoted that. (Note: I didn't click either arrow for that post.)
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:27 PM
7

Admiring is awesome. Harassing, not so much. In many cases, the only difference between admiring and harassing is that the girl likes the guy or not. I can tell my girlfriend what an awesome ass she has, or just barely flirt with her, and she'll love it, but I can't do that with most co-workers or I'll get jailed. Of course, if a particular co-worker likes me, chances are that she will be fine with such a thing, but since they don't come with lists of guys that may "admire" them because somehow …
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:21 PM
10

More to the point, in my experience, it's better for both sexes to be more upfront and honest about their wants and intentions, pretty quickly. Games are for computers and boards, not relationships. Listen to this woman. I'm so tired of idiotic social run and catch games with regards to relationships, love, sex, and everything. I'm so tired of people not telling what they think. I'm so tired of hinting and prick-teasing. The world would be a much better, simpler, nicer place if everyone spoke hi…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 11:18 PM
7

But of course! We need to discuss whether it's fair to be the butt end of divorce law, but god forbid we talk about getting systematically mutilated by our society before we can even choose to.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:40 AM
5

Nowhere. Everybody's far too scared to become a leader of this; it's too politically incorrect, and we live in a politically correct nazi society.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:38 AM
-1

I can't talk for them, but I can talk for myself, though I'm a guy; it's not really illegal if a guy gets raped or anything either way. I wouldn't have minded at all to have sex back then, as long as she wouldn't abuse my lack of knowledge and judgement, and wouldn't have minded it today if it had happened back then. Then again, I'm a sticks and stones person.
/r/MensRights12/05/09 06:06 PM
0

Nor in my country (aoc = 13 here). But I wasn't talking about legal crap, but my own free will.
/r/MensRights12/05/09 02:33 PM
6

It's okay to have women-only taxis, as long as I can have men-only taxis that allow me to arrive at my destination in one piece. </joke>
/r/MensRights12/05/09 08:12 AM
-4

If when I was 12 a 17 years old girl had wanted to lay me, I sure as fuck would have consented and be fucking happy with it.
/r/MensRights12/05/09 07:50 AM
3

As I'm writing this, the OP hasn't written a comment yet elaborating about his problem, so I'm kind of working with what I got. Why not follow the link?
/r/MensRights09/05/09 10:31 AM
13

Whereas men are ridiculed for encompassing unmanly traits such as sensitivity and delicacy, and criminalized for encompassing manly traits such as violence and assertiveness. No matter what you may be like: if you're a male, you will be bashed by politically-correctards, feminists, law makers and the media.
/r/MensRights06/05/09 08:44 AM
4

That's political correctness for you. The bunch of fussboxes who feel like they're some sort of Captain America of niceness and preach tolerance and equality are actually nazi-grade intolerants and the ones who discriminate the most. If you just happen to be a local, male, white and straight, you're fucked: you'll be the butt end of modern society.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 07:49 AM
6

I'd rather offer education on why genital mutilation is stupid and wrong.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 03:46 PM
2

Or Python's.
/r/MensRights23/04/09 11:34 PM
9

This article is wrong because it says men are better at anything. Only articles showing how women are better at something are politically correct and allowable. Same goes for every other """positively""" discriminated group.
/r/MensRights23/04/09 09:07 PM
16

It's not only done for sex. Men will do all sorts of stupid things for sex, but our whole damned western culture is about self-loathe, so-called "positive" discrimination, political correctness incorrectness, think of the children!, and all of these cancerous attitudes.
/r/MensRights23/04/09 07:31 AM
6

Yet most of what feminists are doing in the few last years hurts, oppresses, slanders or otherwise discriminates against men. I particularly like to point out today's political correctness retardation, which is a lump of self- or majority-loathing shit (not majority in the case of men, but anyways), and the so-called "positive" discrimination, which is still discrimination, and is as bad as every other form of irrational discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/04/09 10:19 AM
1

(People, don't downmod pn6 here either, remember, constructive discussion, etc. Upvoted to keep pn6 at +1.) I may be close to see the point in the case of torture in retaliation (although I refuse to give up on my perceived basic human right of punching an idiot in the face), but I can't see how torture is bad in the (rare) case it's provably useful in order to prevent unnecessary harm, such as the classic example of the terrorist with the bomb I posted (note: not any terrorist, just that case w…
/r/MensRights16/04/09 03:29 PM
2

And why is that? I may agree it is, but I'm failing to find a reason to. What's the reasoning for that? I can think of cases where I fail to find a reason to consider torture unacceptable. The classical example of a terrorist caught after setting a bomb which is going to kill two or more people for sure is an example where I'd recommend torture, and in TFA's case, well, it's a minor case of torture on retaliation against a lesser crime - sounds like what he deserved. If this is an unacceptable t…
/r/MensRights16/04/09 01:16 PM
2

Why not? It's a fair punishment. Rapists, for example, should be made to feel the pain they have caused; I can't find any moral problem with this as hard as I try to. And other criminals, probably so; I don't care for criminal scum.
/r/MensRights16/04/09 09:39 AM
-1

You know we are in a western society when the victim who manages to give a criminal what he deserves gets charged and sent into prison. Olga did a good service to the world by making a robber pay and teaching him a lesson, and they go after her as if the robber was a victim. Look, I don't care about Olga's and the robber's sex because I believe in equality and my morals are equal. One of the reasons why I've joined the Men's Rights subreddit is that I've noticed due to our retarded politically c…
/r/MensRights16/04/09 12:12 AM
1

What if we don't criminalize anyone as long as they are both willing to engage in sex for money like any other personal service such as dancing or painting? What if we stop the hipocresy?
/r/MensRights13/04/09 08:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter