TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AaM_S Archive

View 0 posts and 345 comments by AaM_S on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If it was a male teacher and female students, what would you have written then?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/22 06:22 PM
3

Would you leave the same comment if it was a male teacher and female students?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/22 06:21 PM
1

kek
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/22 02:35 PM
10

She deserved even worse
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/22 11:02 PM
0

Alas, I know it too well :( Terrible, really.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 06:05 PM
3

ONLY 18 months? Female privilege in action...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 12:38 PM
9

We're talking about demand for society to believe women by default and men are "guilty until proven innocent", which goes against civilized law system we've developed so far. Any women can accuse a man in whatever shit she wants and ruin his reputation and no one would care that she lied.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 12:10 AM
20

Wut?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 09:25 PM
26

You reap what you sow, ladies!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 07:27 PM
22

Forgot the /s
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 07:26 PM
2

I've saved this to bookmarks, thanks for doing the good job, man!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 12:01 PM
4

Reading this brings me JOY ! Congrats to her husband, he's really smart, you go boy!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 11:51 AM
5

The problem is the word is corrupted now. There a society led by men but designed to maximize female protection to increase population. It's not "now". It's how gynocentrism has been for millennia. And tradcon patriarchy is inevitably gynocentric. So, you can make proper conclusions.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 09:01 PM
30

But, but... "believe women" ain't gonna do this time?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/22 11:58 PM
5

Try watching Cassie Jaye's interviews how her relationship with her then boyfriend improved after she abandoned feminism. This has nothing to do with what I've said. Re-read my 2nd sentence.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:52 PM
8

think about voting for Trump and the GOP in ‘22/’24 Just to remind you that tradcons have been the enablers of female privilege and have always been ready to throw other men under the bus. The case with them blocking the equal draft requirements recently should tell you everything. Tradcons are the enemy of the MRA, and we've already talked volumes about it on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:04 PM
11

yet somehow abandoning feminism improves the lives and mental health of women This is an unsubstantiated claim. Feminism works in the interest of female supremacy, so no, even if individual females may be thrown under the bus, it's definitely not against their interests.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:02 PM
27

You mean outside the US, right? Let's narrow it down.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:03 AM
2

"According to a recent study" (c) Ahahhah :D
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:59 PM
1

Should be ten years though
/r/MensRights12/01/22 07:16 PM
1

He is the one shaming others for their sexual practices. An average tradcon ;D
/r/MensRights11/01/22 09:19 PM
2

Yes, he's trying to learn, so I provided him with necessary resources. It's hard to tell people stuff like this, but it has to be done.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:33 AM
0

It is not wrong for me to tell a homosexual man that he has a chromosome abnormality. It is, because there's no abnormality. Alas, you're part of the problem, OP. You seem to be a tradcon who wants to get back to the traditionalist status quo, which does nothing to fix male expendability. Right now, you're not MRA. And don't lump us all into a single "we, men" group, we're nothing alike, at least yet. You need to step up, start by learning some basics of why the likes of you are an ideological d…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 12:41 AM
9

There's no standard set in stone that we should look upon. I earn for a truly egalitarian relationship between sexes, with mutual non-exclusive responsibilities and rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:13 PM
7

they just give advice for women to be kind, gentle and supportive towards their partners They pathetically are begging women to be nice to them. Tradcons have zero issues with the underlying dynamic of male-female relationship (expendable males must slave for women, while women are enabled to avoid work and responsibility), but they cry over the results of this dynamics. Tradcons are antithetical to MRA.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:10 PM
27

In short - because tradcons support male expendability and are ready to throw other men under the bus in exchange for female validation. Hence, they are not, and can never be, allies of the MRA. Longer version - check this video (I had a hard time finding it after it was deleted from YT). It's an extremely detailed answer that will show you in detail why tradcons do the shit they do and why they are antithetical to men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:06 PM
6

Hypergamy is not cultural, it's instinctual Alas it's true, I was referring to the way that you've called it initially (hypergamous culture). I agree with what you wrote after.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 09:55 PM
16

shows who has control over the media You mean who society actually cares about? :D
/r/MensRights10/01/22 06:12 PM
12

yet we put the emphasize educating women over men. It’s contradictory and unsustainable. Could be sustainable if the hypergamous culture would change.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 06:10 PM
-6

Let's face it - they wouldn't collapse, it's pure cope on your side.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:15 PM
2

^^ This P.S. I wonder who're the assholes that downvoted you...
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:06 PM
1

You didn't get it, did ya?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:05 PM
3

I'd advise the OP to do it vice versa, they should tell this to the girl while they are in the company of friends, so there are witnesses to the conversation. Otherwise, the OP would potentially be open for badmouthing and rumors.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:04 PM
2

Unfortunatly English did not have the equivalent of putting summertime on formal language. Wut?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:02 PM
1

Names are useful in a sense they are short identificators of humans. If our brains were better at coping with large numbers, then yes, names would be pointless as well, but for now they'd work as a shorter ID in human communication (that's what they actually have always been).
/r/MensRights08/01/22 03:10 AM
1

Only species on the planet that has changed their nature. Changing ones nature is evolution. Species constantly evolve, changing their nature. Those who do not evolve, go extinct.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 03:04 AM
1

Surnames are useless anyways, they cannot reliably served as personal identificators. That's why it's enough to only have names and use (hexadecimal) IDs instead of useless surnames.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:53 AM
4

I'm Eastern European, and I bear maternal family name. Wanna say something again?
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:49 AM
2

A tradcon forcing gender roles on people, look who's part of the problem, huh...
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:46 AM
2

Who’s name do the kids have? Ideally, it's enough to have only names and have IDs instead of surnames, they are pretty useless anyway...
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:37 AM
0

Radical right - you mean tradcons? What have tradcons fixed?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:43 PM
1

With "whomever you want whenever you want" is not open to much nuance. Well, I wasn't writing an essay, but was slapping the tradcon, of course the reply would not contain nuances. But we've settled this now. extraterritorial ancap jurisdictions What? Jurisdictions that operate outside of fixed territory. You can use their legal coverage as a service, without being bound to any location.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 08:42 PM
0

What did you just reply? What innocents? Do you mean abortion, tradconhead? The fetuses are not "innocents", it's a piece of meat with zero rights and zero legal capacity. Now, was this your entire argument?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 08:38 PM
1

What more do you need? I answered as briefly as possible, what exactly do you wish to know? The main issue is that traditionalism supports men being expendable, so there's no way I'd tolerate it.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 08:36 PM
1

You were quite clear, whenever you want. So you want sex on demand. On demand, provided there's supply of course. It's hard to draw all the nuisances in a single sentence. Legally in any commonwealth country, a woman can rape a man or statutorily rape I know, I'm talking about extraterritorial ancap jurisdictions, as the question was about things going in ancap formation. OK, what is this? Ehm, like you've never encountered ancap before? I'm talking about anarcho-capitalism political economic th…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:56 PM
1

Do they have any say in the matter? I presume the do. And if you don't you probably want CS from the man. This must be discussed in advance by both parties. Terms and conditions may vary depending on exact contract jurisdiction we're in. Ideally, in ancap sex is commercialized, so there should be a quick consent online app form one fills up in a couple of clicks that describes responsibility of parties involved, that could even be a part of insurance package a private company may provide. Btw, y…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:47 PM
2

How is this leftist propaganda if that's literally what a tradcuck is saying about men?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:51 AM
-1

P.S. the party of small government, Laizze fare (don't care if I spelled it wrong), advocating gun rights, and freedom of speech is hardly what I would cal This is not what cuckservatives stand for. The true freedom is ancap, and that includes my freedom to fuck whoever I want, whenever I want and do abortions as much as I want. Last time I've heard, you cuckservatives, were against this, because you do like to control people's sexuality, amirite?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:46 AM
4

Like I said, it's conservatives or nothing No. It's false dichotomy. You're getting back to being a slave, as men have always been historically. Enslaved by their rulers and women. It's a dead end.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:44 AM
2

I suspect that many men would like to go back to traditionalism if they felt they were getting a fair deal No.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:42 AM
3

Tell that tradcon shithead to STFU. Even in the article you provided, the tradshit bashes men as they are not willing to be used as tools "for the greater good" as he wants them to. This is a great example of how tradcons view men - as expendable resource, and it has been a constant in their worldview. So, in all honesty, fuck him.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:38 AM
1

Your sexist in other words. How on earth did you conclude that? Are you sure you understand what "sexist" means? You've been demonstrating sexism by adhering to so-called "gender roles" so far. If a woman hits you and your ego is hurt as a man dont come crying. You've pulled that example out of your ass. I do not have any prejudices so I do not have a fear of humiliation from women, like tradcons do. If a woman hits me, I hit her back, I'm yearning for true equality, ya know. "I'LL PAY FOR THAT …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:25 PM
1

but I found his arguments unconvencing Well, it's only logical cause there hardly can be an argument for MRA being pro-life.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:07 PM
2

It is humiliation for men. It is not. It's your gender prejudices kicking in. So your point is invalid. You were not able to demonstrate this. All you have is your feeling of how genders should be seen (dictated by the tradcon view on gender norms), but you're unable to pinpoint it to anything objective. which is not based on feelings. If your really want women to go to MMA then make them fight females. I want everyone to fight whoever they wish, make a show, please the audience, earn a buck, th…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 09:34 PM
48

Moments like this make me good proud for my country :D Though we still have a long path to go until women are properly conscripted on the same basis as men are.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/21 07:54 PM
2

Its sexist and Humiliating. It's definitely not sexist. How is it sexist? And there's no humiliation in putting a show. If women themselves do not view this as humiliation, who are you to tell them that it is?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:49 PM
2

We have that in Spain already. Could you elaborate? Is there a law that allows to legally change gender through self-identification in Spain?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:48 PM
5

I think it is disrespectfull if men and women hit each other. If they do it out of mutual consent and for the public's amusement, I see no issue. Any professional sport is about putting a show for the audience. And you seem to be too much of a tradcon with your gender biases.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:38 PM
2

You would assume a Patriarchy society ruled by tradcon are pro man Nah, I know better than to assume this. Tradcon societies are extremely anti-male.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:33 PM
17

Ah, a "women most affected" thing again!
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:30 PM
2

Traditionalism is no solution either. It won't do anything to the male expendability, which is the root cause of men's suffering.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:39 PM
6

both feminism and mens rights seek the same goal of equality for both genders I'm afraid no. Feminism denies male expendability, so we cannot go far in the direction of equality from there...
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:24 PM
4

they have been pushing for equality for centuries... They weren't. It was about supremacy from the very start. Voting rights? You know what suffragists were most afraid of? Having to be drafted in case they get voting rights. Only once they were sure that they would not be eligible for draft in exchange for voting, they started pushing for voting rights full on.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:18 PM
6

Indeed. And it's proven by the fact that the first major thing that this "traditionalism" did was to fight to omit women from the draft. These "traditionalists" or "tradcons" are almost just as misandrist as the feminists themselves. Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:13 PM
6

Reverting to good old traditionalism. Which was never good, especially for men.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:04 PM
4

Yup, that's true
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:59 PM
5

This^^
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:58 PM
1

The alignments proposed in the selection are so uninformative, it makes me cringe. OP, better use normal political compass. For example, what the hell does far right/left even mean? They can be libertarian and authoritarian (far) right/left, but it would be impossible to deduct from the questionnaire. As for me, I'm an ancap transhumanist, which is generally libertarian right, but it's still hard to fit into 2 axis compass.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:31 PM
19

Well, how many times should I repeat that tradcons are anti-male and are the enemy of the MRA? They are the second part of the problem, besides feminists.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:47 AM
3

and this is directly linked to free market right wing ideology being transformed into policy Free market my ass when it's controlled by the governments, and governments pushing their control on the market participants. That's not free market. the elimination of extreme greed and the undemocratic power heald over great swathes of the population through manipulation, coercion, and threat What exactly are you proposing? Exact steps please.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:30 AM
3

>kids >virgin >already a red flag for "beta" terminology Looks like a freaking troll.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:07 AM
2

Anyone else have someone just come up and feel your muscles? Yes, had it quite a number of times with familiar girls. But again, it was only with the girls I knew.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:02 AM
1

How can you demonstrate which god is false and which is true? You cannot even demonstrate that a god exists.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:45 PM
2

What I asked to cite is where I stated that "men need better rights then other men", that's the exact quote you prescribed to me. An answer to your question was already given: "if men where treated expendably through out history, who was treating him that way? By men who were their rulers AND by women. Re-read my answer above. So I say this again, this is not a man vs man thing, this is a man vs woman thing! I literally proved this to be false in the previous reply, how long will you be playing …
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:44 PM
1

It’s a logical fallacy to assume God. Then your entire argument crumbles at the very first premise of yours.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:40 PM
1

Because there is no scientific basis behind it. This is what I've been talking about from the very start. There's no scientific basis indeed, but 25 is like keeping people celibate for ages just for the fear that they are not adult enough to think about their actions... As if 30 y.o. are (they aren't always). Hence, I do not see any reason to believe that a 14 y.o. are incapable of understanding what they want, I do not infantilize people. As for your 2nd paragraph, it's not what we're really ta…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:39 PM
1

It is true and we haven't.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:21 PM
8

Simply put - none.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:14 PM
1

And no, we haven't over-ruled nature. We've literally been doing this for millennia.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:04 PM
1

I'm not sure I follow, are you aware that the assumptions you use in the argument cannot be verified?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:22 AM
0

So, you managed a half-assed reply to my p.2, before I reply to it, where are your replies to p. 1, 3 and 4? It's not cool when I answer each of your point, but you ignore 75% of what's asked of you. Holy fuck, you really are this dumb. You can screech as much as you wish, but so far you're losing the debate and your replies become less and less on topic. Your attempt to cover this under the guise of false confidence is pathetic. I'm awaiting your responses to the remaining points.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:18 AM
1

No I think scientifically it should be raised to 25 Oh, why not to 30, so the person has enough life experience, my dear puritan friend? it would solve a lot of society's problem Believing in human agency and that there's no crimes without victims would have solved a lot of society's problems, instead of society enforcing its repressed complexes over people.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:13 AM
1

Well, ideally...
/r/MensRights21/12/21 04:23 PM
7

Maybe you are really in the wrong forum. I'm afraid it's you who got a bit lost. As I mentioned, you're completely not getting where you are and what is even happening. There is no one in this forum that is saying that men need rights against men. Men need rights not against somebody, but rights for themselves. No one is saying that men need better rights then other men. No one is saying that some men need their rights elevated because some men disrespect their rights. This is the talk of someon…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 04:07 PM
4

Trying to over-rule nature is a short road to collapse Here I lost ya. We've been overruling nature through our entire road to civilization. Otherwise, we'd need to return to hunter-gatherer societies, where children will be communal, by the way, as no one would know who the father is and the entire tribe would care about them. I'd agree with you on point that people need to think in advance how they would support a family in case none of them have a good stable income. And indeed in time of pre…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 03:57 PM
1

Yes, I'd say the same, I believe that people have their head on their shoulders and are responsible for their actions and teenagers are no exception. You didn't answer my question though.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:58 PM
13

Please tell us if the data provided here helped your case and what your wife responded.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:56 PM
0

How did you determine that it's exactly your god that is true? And that this god is described in your religion accurately?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:52 PM
1

Ok, I disagree with each of the premises. The first three duties and genders are perfect in nature. They are mirrored after Jesus' Trinity of the soul, boy, and mind property ownership of personhood. Unsupported assumption. You cannot prove these even exist. Basically, whatever else you write is automatically discarded. because it cannot be demonstrated as true. Freedom of speech caused Gender. No. Gender is Free Speech transcendental, so also in rest, death, and marriage consent “I Do”, before …
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:29 PM
0

Why have faith in your Xstian god and not that it's all Azatoth's dream? Prove that it's exactly your god and that exactly your faith is the right one. Spoiler: you cannot.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:24 PM
1

When I was 14, I could. May be that's why I started with the suggestion that we should view each case individually? I say we can't consent when fucking adults. What exactly do you mean here?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:16 PM
5

Enough english speaking areas where men don't get f'd over by cultural judgement What are the areas like these?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:06 PM
1

I'm arguing that 14 y.o. are no kids and that the concept of "informed consent" has never been shown to even exist. What is it really? An abstract concept created to suit a certain ideological narrative, nothing more. It does not empirically exist as some natural fact.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:24 PM
-4

AK-74, that's the one model most used :D and 14 year olds now are much less mature and "babied" more Needs actual proof. I'm not convinced of that at all. I remember myself at 14, I was a grown-ass. Same for my friends and classmates. We surely did have understanding of what we were doing. What we're seeing now is a toxic infantilization of teenagers. They are not mindless toddlers, they know what they are doing and they do not need excessive care. So no, there's nothing "obvious" here.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:11 PM
2

that men some how need to be pulled up to the level of rights of women Yes. If men were treated expendably through out history, who was treating him that way?! By men who were their rulers - men are ready to throw other men under the bus to raise their status, something tradcons are comfortable with - and that's part of why they should not be here. And, of course, by women. Also saying that men are on a lower level of rights than women because of his being expendable makes me wonder why their wa…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:13 PM
-5

Go on, downvote silently, I'm amazed by your counterarguments! /s
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:07 PM
-9

Hmm, that's a slippery slope where I would say that each case must be viewed individually. If 14 y.o. cannot consent, what makes one believe that 16 y.o. can? 18 y.o.? 14 used to be an age people took sword and fought in Medieval armies... In modern times, child soldiers at that age evidently can handle AK-74 and chop heads, but we're expected to believe they cannot give an educated consent? There's zero science to prove that 20 y.o. consents differently than a 14 y.o.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:50 AM
1

I mean that men have been always treated like expendable gender, unlike women. Men had to prove their worth, while women did not have to do that. The above nullifies any "rights" you're arguing about. Men have always been treated by society as expendable meat.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:41 AM
0

hunger is equal across genders dumb dumb xD sex drive for men and women are totally different lol 1 - hunger is not really "equal" across gender, you've been pointed that out already. You took that "equal" out of your ass, it seems. 2 - you're assuming that it's really different and not dictated by societal norms we've had for millennia. 3 - I did not use any analogy so far, "selling bodies in the market" is not an analogy, my dear. 4 - I did not hear what your solution is. So, what exactly are …
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:39 AM
2

sex work is exploitive of men Ah, so that's where you're coming from. Should have written more clearly, you've used to much unnecessary text in your previous reply, making your rambling incoherent. Sex work is not exploitive of men any more than buying hamburgers is exploitive of human hunger. There's nothing wrong in selling bodies on the market if people are willing to pay for it. Do you propose to ban sex work? How old are you? "It's nothing what I've written." I feel like I'm talking to a 7 …
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:51 PM
2

You're repeating in circles. I replied to your question in quite detailed way, what's not clear? What rights are you talking about?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:44 PM
2

Did the rights of men somehow disappear? They never were, for starters. Men have always been seen as expendable, a woman was inherently valuable, but man had to prove his worth (something a woman never had to). Men have always been the expendable gender, so there has been no golden age of which you're dreaming.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:09 PM
2

So, let's say there's one point, I do not see how your reply addresses it. You're talking about something you imagine yourself, it's nothing what I've written.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:08 PM
3

Our problem is not what women have become (they have always been the same), our problem is how to fix male expandability so men can enjoy the same level of rights and dignity that women do. You seem to be missing the point completely.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:27 PM
2

In a way that prohibiting sex work is cringe, that's what I mean. I'm all for people selling their bodies if they want to.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:16 PM
2

He supports previous status quo, so he supports male expandability and putting women on a pedestal. That's the root cause of the evil men experience, so I do not see how he could ever resolve men's issues.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:15 PM
0

So it's fine to exploit men for their desires but not women? Weird Where did I say that? I'm all for brothels and selling sex work in whatever combinations possible. I'm not sure what point of mine you're answering...
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:06 PM
-11

if you are against sex work you are misogynist Well, I'd probably agree on that with her...
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:29 PM
2

That's a really good question. But it contains one central flaw - male expandability is supported not only by the woke culture, but by the very fabric of any society that we've seen. Tradcons support male expandability fully, and the recent story with the draft showed that. So the main point is that you should not bear any illusions that if "woke" suddenly disappeared, that men would somehow become less expandable. Nope, there's much more being rigged against men than many realize. Understanding…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:56 PM
3

It indeed is, and the problem is that tradcons are antithetical to men's rights. Take the recent story with the draft as an example. Point is, tradcons support male expendability and that's the threat they pose to men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:51 PM
3

Yea, he's the example of cancer MRA movement must get rid of.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:07 PM
4

Tradcon much, I see? You kin are not welcome here. You are part of the problem and are no friend.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:07 PM
2

Marxism worked real well for the workers in the USSR and other communist countries. Did you forget /s at the end?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:28 PM
2

If I could summarize, it would be this: "Hurt people hurt people". Every side clings to what it sees as its hope, as the means to get protection (or settle the score) from/with the other side. if anyone has any ideas on how to end the cycle of toxicity men and women are currently stuck in The root of evil is male disposability and that society is wired to see women as inherently valuable, while a man is worthless until he "proves" his value, he's only valuable for what he can provide. Until this…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:12 PM
1

Woke culture is the least of your problems. The root of evil is male disposability and that society is wired to see women as inherently valuable, while a man is worthless until he "proves" his value, he's only valuable for what he can provide. That's the root cause of all your issues.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:00 PM
1

Woke culture is the least of your problems. The root of evil is male disposability and that society is wired to see women as inherently valuable, while a man is worthless until he "proves" his value, he's only valuable for what he can provide. That's the root cause of all your issues.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:54 PM
1

Ah, at least not many enough answers listing JP... that's good. That anti-male hypocrite is cancerous to MRA.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:52 PM
3

Well, people are people. Men, women... but don't flatter yourself with false hope that if feminism went extinct, women would somehow start caring about your issues as a man. That's as far from truth as it could be.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 02:00 PM
1

for these modern women Modernity has nothing to do with this. This has been female nature for all of humanity's existence.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:33 PM
7

But theres an awful lot of people that don't care about men's rights and just hate women. How did you establish that these people don't care about men's rights? As for their view on women, they are simply disillusioned realists.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:32 PM
7

Women can do whatever the shit they want, and society sucks it up, that's been the reality for ages.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 09:08 PM
1

How does that disprove what I've written?
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:30 PM
1

You know what is outlawed ? Being trans. Where? In Murica?
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:06 AM
2

Men are not oppressed. You've been proven wrong on this already, you are either playing dumb or you're not interested in actually listening to what you're told.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:04 AM
13

Ok, here's a FAQ for ya Women's rights that men don't have, granted by law: A commission on the status of women in every state, funded by taxpayer dollars (men only have one, in NH, and it is unfunded). Tax benefits for being a "woman-owned business" Government contracts guaranteed to women-owned (and minority owned) businesses. Violence Against Women Act. IMBRA Full rights to their own born children. Men only get rights to their children when granted by the courts or by the legal precedent of m…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 11:59 PM
10

Yup, it's tradcon hell gone loose there
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:51 PM
1

Where? I don't see exact examples.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:36 PM
2

Thanks, I indeed am. What pisses me off are not that much the feminists, who are our open enemy, but tradcons, who are distractors, as they lead men away from realizing the actual truth of the situation.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:35 PM
0

Wow, that rare case when I'm agreeing with u/EnvironmentalWar4627 oh my... But hey, we're both arguing against a tradcon, and tradcons are anti-MRA, so...
/r/MensRights14/12/21 07:09 PM
3

especially historical facts that show life was better under the older "patriarchal" systems Ehm, I'm no feminist, but an MRA, and that's pure BS. That past was misandrist and gynocentric as hell, so not much has changed.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 07:07 PM
4

Ah yes, another proof that tradcons are anti-male and anti-MRA, something I've know for years...
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:41 PM
2

A man would have gotten much harsher sentence, that's actually a case of a pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 04:30 PM
1

Have some self respect. That man in the story did have real self-respect, so I respect him. Ya know, if more men had self-respect like him, women would think twice before pulling off shit like taking men's kids.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:16 PM
1

Uppupu, I'm so heartbroken (nope).
/r/MensRights14/12/21 03:54 PM
1

Just because someone calls themselves something means nothing His channel is one of the few ones that's indeed pro-male, while those tradcons he's describing are distractors, who are, in essence, anti-male. to push their political agenda Please provide exact examples of this.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 03:52 PM
3

Hm, I know he's one of the admins of the pro-male groups, and has a youtube channel with really good pro-male content. Do you find anything wrong with his position?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:29 PM
1

But at least men get a level of respect. Not sure at all. They don't know what respect is.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:27 PM
1

Uppupu :D (New World Order starts playing in the background)
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:25 PM
4

Alas...
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:20 PM
5

I’d be fine with this if they didn’t also claim to champion gender equality. You'd be fine with your gender used as slaves while women have it better? You're pathetic.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:08 PM
4

Just cause forcing men to be drafted is wrong doesn't mean women should be forced into drafting. Yes, it freaking DOES. The only way men's rights will prevail is by dragging women into hell with us.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:07 PM
4

How? Didn't cuckservatives block the requirement for women to register for the draft? Or is this a propaganda too, you lil misandrist?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:06 PM
2

Yup, u/colombomumbojumbo you're blasting it as always ;D
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:46 PM
16

And you called Conservatives Evil for opposing it... I call conservatives evil for opposing the requirement for women to register for draft. I know it's a different issues, but that showed the axiom that tradcons are anti-MRA.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:36 PM
21

We've been telling that cuckservatives are anti-MRA for ages, alas, people start seeing this only now.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:31 PM
6

not directly in firefights getting blown up by ieds But what's wrong with women getting blown up by ieds? I don't want them to just be a compliment, I want them right on the battlefield.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:15 PM
12

Can't blame him though. And to be honest, I'd have likely acted the same in his place.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:55 PM
4

because we seek the glory of self sacrifice Speak for yourself, tradcon.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:05 PM
0

This ^^^
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:03 PM
-2

Responsibilities will never be equalized, blank slate equality is a fantasy and will never happen. They are already equalized in some countries, like compulsory military service for both men and women. It's much more fun to suffer together!
/r/MensRights12/12/21 06:49 PM
3

I awaited that comment :D
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:54 PM
-4

What some of these comments say is that they basically want to keep women safe more than they want equal responsibilities from both sexes, and that's alarming.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:18 PM
-1

it’s that I want them to realize that they don’t actually want to be drafted and be “equal”. Want them to realize that they don’t actually want to be held responsible when shit hits the fan, so maybe they can relax on their whole equality nonsense when they realize how much they depend on men and realize how privileged they are What you're saying is common tradcon "Mommy please be nice to me" rhetoric. This is anti-male in its core.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:18 PM
5

Wait, there's no draft in Poland for now, is it?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:17 PM
12

Since US and UE try to coax Ukraine(former URSS part) away from Russian authority You're wrong. Ukraine decided it wanted to move civilizationally west, instead of staying in a post-soviet dump with Russia, so the latter panicked and tried to interfere. In the end it made Ukrainians solidify as a nation and basically cemented Ukraine's way to the Western civilization and hatred towards the moscovites.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:14 PM
0

So if you have a passing thought it's fact? Shocking. Oh, so tradcons supporting anti-male policies is a "passing thought"? Or you being a dick to the OP is a "passing thought"? Red flags are not for you to care, it's for others to see you for who you are. And in the last paragraph I wasn't talking about your opinion, I was talking about how tradcons are detrimental to the MRA. How you could not share their agenda but still be a tradcon is a matter best left to yourself.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:26 PM
0

Oh so you put a label on me, Oh, so you're no true tradcon Scotsman, I see. Regardless, you've acted like a piece of shit towards the OP, and enforcing gender roles that you view to be right on the OP doesn't give you credit. If this is not a red flag already, then what else do we need? P.S. then attribute a particular policy to everyone with that label If tradcons are the ones who blocked this initiative and if it's within tradcon's worldview to see men as expendable while pondering to women, t…
/r/MensRights10/12/21 09:59 PM
1

I recall it was tradcons who blocked females from having to sign for the draft, so yeah, tradcons are anti-male, and anti-MRA. Have anything else to say?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:48 PM
11

Imagine using "woke" unironically... Problem with these ratings is they don't explain why the score is exactly like that. P.S. Since tradcons blocked female draft registration, will this app be getting an update to measure tradconery?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:21 PM
0

This ^^
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:57 PM
0

But aren't they?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:55 PM
1

Repeat with me: Conservatives, aka tradcons, are anti-male and are the enemy of the MRA. Repeat it as many times until it's cemented in your head.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:54 PM
1

Who the fuck cares what the OP does to their own body? Since when is this your business?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:47 PM
0

Dear mods, I wonder how long we're gonna have anti-male, tradcon assholes here on this subreddit? You brought zero value to the conversation so far, what's your excuse?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:46 PM
3

I give absolutely zero shit about these women and about these embryos, all I care about are men's rights, our rights.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:17 PM
3

The only way men's rights will prevail is by dragging women into hell with us. Mind if I still this phrase for future negotiations? :D
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:17 PM
1

So, we should support cuckservatives, who are anti-male? No, your B does not follow from A. No one's saying the 2nd part of your sentence, triggered tradcon. We should hate you both and only support politicians that show they are pro-male.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:13 PM
5

This needs a separate post. Why don't we write a collective email to each of these deepshits, just so they know we're watching them?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:11 PM
6

Conservative men are exactly who did it, all these rep senators who are tradcons, are conservatives. So just call them what they are and stop pretending as if tradcons are pro-MRA.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:01 PM
4

In any case it will be the man who'll be paying the child support, so banning abortions changes nothing.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:59 PM
6

What, since when opposing abortion is pro-MRA? MRA don't give a shit about controlling women's bodies, like tradcons, that prohibition doesn't bring men anything.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:16 PM
24

What MRA-related issues are they not bad on?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:08 PM
51

This is another repeated lesson that tradcons are the enemy of the MRAs and can never be trusted. They are anti-male, anti-egalitarian and are anti-MRA. Seriously, screw you, cuckervatives.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:04 PM
1

I am in principle against abortion Yeah, you're the second part of the problem, while you've described the first one.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:30 PM
1

No woman who knows what she is aborting, her own child, would do that. I highly doubt that.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:29 PM
15

r/MensRights might be a better place for this, OP, at least there you may get actual help
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/21 09:03 PM
12

That's a 2011 article. Now compare the actual stats for 2020 and make a conclusion.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:59 PM
2

Oh my, it seems the OP got so triggered, they removed their own comment...
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:16 PM
2

Yeah, I agree, women haven't moved too much outside of animal kingdom. Edit: Men too, alas.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:26 PM
2

I wasn't aware that the term vicitm cannot be used unless something that is specifically illegal happened. It cannot. There's no crime without a clear victim (at least that's how it should be), and there's no victim here.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:25 PM
2

His problem was not staring, his problem was that he was "creepy old man". As a handsome guy, I personally never have a problem with staring or flirting with women in gyms, especially that even married women are pretty open to it. That, my fellas, is the truth here - if you're handsome, you'll get a pass where a freak would not. P.S. That's not to mention that you should always know where the limit is and that "no" means no, don't be creeps, though.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:15 PM
3

And of course you did not get the joke, silly.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 01:38 PM
1

Don't you know that producing babies in factories is the future? Don't get in the way of my Brave New World, pleb. (sarcasm, but not so much). On a serious note though, you seem to be young and dumb, from what I've learnt from our prior conversation.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 01:37 PM
2

Thanks mate, you've saved me quite a lot of work with this reply ;D
/r/MensRights05/12/21 12:51 PM
2

That case is not so much about MRAs, but it illustrates really good that picket-fence tradcons are an issue for Men's Rights activism.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:37 PM
7

old feminist truly just want equality That's wrong, alas. There's no "good old" feminism to contrast with "new bad" one.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:34 PM
2

Nothing's wrong, they are just using fallacies to get you sidetracked from conversation, with clear ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:31 PM
95

I really hope it would work for both misandry and misogyny, although something tells me my hopes may not last long...
/r/MensRights02/12/21 07:06 PM
2

I see nothing on your page that validates your script. I'm not sure I follow, what page? What script? Are you using Google translate? So, you surely agree that transparency here has provided me more street cred than you…. How did street cred appear in that discussion? JP runs his life & he has slain his own dragons & demons. As had each of us. Why is he special? Besides, please city my sentence where I talked about him not cleaning his room, etc. Did you watch the video? Did you even understand …
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:44 PM
2

Lols…. You are an Avatar ….. total fiction & irrelevant to this post!!!!! Are you an ESL? Your sentences are too vague. Do you understand what MRA even is and why JP is not our ally?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:16 PM
3

The feedback from the entire World disagree with you. Kindly elaborate. What feedback exactly? That men love JP because he tells them what they want to hear, instead of what they need to hear? That feedback you mean? Perhaps you hate men. I'm an MRA and JP is a tradcon whose entire worldview brings men nothing good. You do not understand what the reason behind men's issues is, kid.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:15 PM
7

No. Just stop. Here's a good video for ya that shows that toothless dog JP for what he really is - a cope cowardly tradcon, begging women to be nice, while never having courage to call them out. He's absolutely anti-MRA, so don't put any hopes in him.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:44 PM
4

I'm not sure I understand you correctly. You basically said above that protecting your home with arms is necessary, so that's why selective service exists. What's wrong with including women in it?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:18 PM
1

I did not see an argument in your statement, it's an adhominem. Please provide something that at least looks like an argument.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:07 PM
4

This arguement is so flimsy it's almost difficult to know how to address it. That's your personal statement, but look who's got the downvotes, seems people don't agree with you on the argument being flimsy, huh? So what, gonna go further into sophistry? and if you gave an example I could explain why you are wrong here. That was a general statement that women have been manipulating men, including through means of sex, to get what they wanted. While men had to bear all the responsibility that soci…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:55 PM
1

Wasn't ideal, but definitely triumphs having to rot in the trenches away from home for no reason any day. And "context" won't change a thing here.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:47 PM
6

However, if I had to choose between that and being essentially a child legally, I would take the soldiering any day Then your choice is foolish. Men were disposable cattle and had full responsibility for everything. Women basically had their asses in a safe place and could shift all the troubles to men, while bearing close to zero responsibility for anything. And women were pretty ok with the status quo, because they had it better. Even now, every time there's a risk of a female draft, you sudde…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:58 PM
6

Did women have more power be that social, political, or capital? Yes, they've been using men as proxies from times immemorial. And when shit hit the fan, it were men to take the blame, not the woman who used him. Were men more opressed? Absolutely, and they are still oppressed now, way more than women. Did women have better lives? Yes, they did and they still do. Anything more to say?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:55 PM
1

Trying to figure out which is "worse" is just not a fruitful endeavor. There's nothing to figure out, we've already long established that, case closed.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 01:53 PM
41

Yes, they still had enough protection from the law, while men were used as expendable cattle, with a war waging every decade.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:55 AM
41

Gender roles are and have always been worse for men, that's fact 101.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 11:53 PM
6

Men already have the right to abort any baby growing Inside them. Wut?
/r/MensRights27/11/21 11:26 PM
4

I still didn't get why abortion should be illegal according to what you wrote. Or are you actually worried about that piece of meat we call a fetus?
/r/MensRights27/11/21 11:23 PM
1

If you're talking about a state and a draft, though, you're out of the realm of individualism. That's why we need to never escape the realm of individualism completely and weight all actions and decisions from individual human perspective. Otherwise, why have a state if it requires the loss of your individual well-being.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 07:35 PM
1

I don't know why they downvote you, just so yuo know - I agree with everything you wrote.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 06:34 PM
7

When will Switzerland abolish men-only draft, or at lest include women in it? Equality my ass. But I do hope they will rewrite that law soon and enlist women as well, it would be just.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 06:18 PM
1

It's not just about hoods. It's about the government that treats you like expendable shit, corruption unmatched by anything in the US and the feeling of absolute powerlessness to do anything and no hope for a change. That's the real dread, my dear.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:36 AM
3

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:45 PM
6

The list of the countries that qualify are those you definitely would NOT want to live in...
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:40 PM
4

beliefe Russianis fucking gorgeous I visited last year and I want to go again. Czechia also is beautiful Russia may be a beautiful land, but it'll be dangerous for you to live there, as a Ukrainian I know what I'm talking about, and yes, I know better than you.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:22 PM
1

Fight the gender gap system and lose, stressing yourself and hurting your own health Fight the gender gap and never give up until you win or until you die, that's the answer.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:05 PM
1

Yes this is matriarchy Tbh, not really that. That's still a binary gender system (as it's always been) that has been screwing both genders violently, but men have had it way harder, alas.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/21 11:38 PM
7

Let me know once you've convinced him to change his position.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:43 PM
11

Why would we care about his intent? His action could bring harm to men, that's all I care.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:09 PM
12

the unwritten social contracts that bind society together I don't recall ever signing it, you, misandrist shit. And if I, as a man, have no choice, but to suffer, I'll make sure I support the duty of females to suffer as well.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:07 PM
7

Your man-hating mumbling is the best argument why we need to push for transhumanism and dispose of genders and gender roles and identities.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:07 PM
10

THIS^^^ THIS^^^ And one more time THIS^^^ Alas, the sub is filled with tradcons who are perfectly willing to throw other men under the bus if it means they'd be getting females...
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:05 PM
1

Careful with words, you do not know what they mean, nor do you know the person you're talking to. This pseudo-MRA above is another tradcon with picket-fence dreams, and this sub is filled with them a lot. And what I'm showing is again how easily men are manipulated by women. There's much work to be done by men's rights activists here. Edit: Oh my, now he deleted the comment :D
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:28 PM
3

I guess an obvious answer would be that they shouldn't
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:25 PM
-34

when feminism is over wake me up and ill go back to helping women again Bruh, females have been exploiting men for eons, it really bothers me that so-called MRAs like you are ready to go on like this.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:51 PM
1

What does true masculinity look like, if there even is such a thing? The biggest question I have to the likes of you, who ask this question - why does it matter to you?
/r/MensRights11/11/21 09:17 PM
30

from a magazine that seems to pose a female alternative to feminism Don't get your hopes high. Their alternative would likely be some tradcon idea of using men's resources while staying behind men's back, so male expendability does not go anywhere.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 09:25 PM
2

The problem is that gender-binary system hurts. I'm not sure patriarchy exists in the form that you're describing it. Neither does matriarchy. The problem, alas, goes to our biological roots, and that predisposes humans to value women inherently, while men have to earn their value. This is connected with the general issue of male disposability, men being the disposable gender. Of course, men throwing other men under the bus doesn't help at all. Hence, men should help each other and create suppor…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 09:08 PM
3

Yes, that's the correct answer
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:54 PM
8

1 - Correct 2 - I understood your point, though your premise is flawed, so-called "patriarchy" (which does not exist in any pure form, same as matriarchy) hurts men more, i.e. male disposability.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:52 PM
7

It would suck just a bit more if you were a woman. In Murica? Definitely not. They (we?) are trying to help you but you aren't hearing us! Again the system feminists are fighting is hurting you too. I wanted to smack you hard in another thread, but ok, let's use this one. Please list exactly how exactly feminists are trying to help him. But there are definitely a few feminists who take shit too far, just like there are men here who do the same things. Feminists taking it "too far" (which they do…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:45 PM
6

2 questions to you: Do you support draft of women? Yes or No. We're not discussing whether you support the draft, just whether we should draft women or not. What's your point overall?
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:38 PM
7

We need more people like Kevin Samuels that encourage women to have realistic expectations of men We need more men standing up for men's rights, not men expecting that women would become nicer to them. I'm sick of seeing men being desperate for female attention, when what they should really focus on is finding the value in themselves.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:01 PM
1

Throw a dart at a map and it will land on a primarily monogamous society. If I throw a dart and it lands on a polygamous society, then what? You did not answer my question, how did families of hunter gatherers differ from tradcon views on families? How do the families of current hunter-gatherers differ from tradcon family scheme? Problem is, tradcon's dream has nothing to do with how humanity was for the majority of its existence. The "evidence" (for which there's no fixed consensus though) does…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:22 PM
1

They argue that monogamy was central to this cooperative system In the agricultural societies of the neolitic era? May be. But I'm not aware of any consensus that it was the case earlier. Familial structures go back they believe to protohumans. And how did these familial structures look like? Classical tradcon father/mother/children family, right? Of course not. Look at how current tribes live, many do not form families in tradcon understanding. And these are nowadays tribes, so you get the idea…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 07:53 PM
1

Let's review the core of you argument: I believe that fundamentally man is tribal, and ancient man’s personality and characteristics were molded by the needs of the tribe. It was, long ago. In that, there are tendencies toward role fulfillment. I would argue that these roles became innately reflected in our biology. Furthermore, that man needs to be true to his biology in order to optimize his or her health and happiness. Debatable. Are you implying we cannot control our biology? We wouldn't hav…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 07:19 PM
1

Re-read my reply, especially its second part. We're talking about the most desired jobs, that the competition is actually for.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:39 PM
1

If you're implying that male expandability (the real underlying issue) is lesser in China, than that's kind of amusing. Once a state reaches a certain economic and technological level that it specializes its production on, there's a limited number of ways its society can function. Hence, all developed societies will face the same ups and downs and will generally repeat the same cycles.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:37 PM
12

The west will die out in time It's not that simple. The socio-economic system will go on replicating itself cycle after cycle, doesn't matter what nations are used in the meatgrinder. If you believe this will eventually transform to some global tradcon wet-dream heaven, that ain't gonna do.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:25 AM
6

We are. There's only a limited number of jobs out there, unless you're willing to be a janitor.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:22 AM
-7

We real men aren't threatened by the success of women. Bring it on. We'll dominate even if the game is rigged. I wonder if this is an irony or you're that full of de-facto toxic anti-male red-pill shit...
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:22 AM
2

Because you have brains and enough willpower to use them.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:36 PM
2

I ain’t received no sexism based on being a man and if I did I wasn’t called slurs for it. Oh my, let's get started then, a little rundown for ya: Women's rights that men don't have, granted by law: -A commission on the status of women in every state, funded by taxpayer dollars (men only have one, in NH, and it is unfunded). -Tax benefits for being a "woman-owned business" Government contracts guaranteed to women-owned (and minority owned) businesses. Violence Against Women Act. IMBRA Full right…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:22 PM
2

This ^^^
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:10 PM
0

Idk why the downvotes ;D
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:09 PM
3

a very patient man Or a very naive one... still believing one can talk with words against hatred, huh...
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:09 PM
3

Because many men are insecure and desperate, that's why.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:06 PM
1

Whoa, you've got triggered freaking fast
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:02 PM
6

The fact that you, the OP, have to even argue about masplaining with your SO is a freaking giant red flag. Feel free to make a conclusion...
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:59 PM
6

This ^^^ The fact that the OP has to even argue about masplaining with his SO is a freaking giant red flag.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:58 PM
1

Really good answer, alas that mofo wouldn't likely reply at all.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:36 PM
1

Racism=being systematically discriminated against. Sexism = being systematically discriminated against. Like sexism against men, mysandry, society's gynocentrism. Got it?
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:34 PM
15

the last one that talks about mens issues that I have found r/ProMaleCollective and r/Pro_Male_Collective are good sources as well.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:35 AM
8

Haven't done much to even protect our own rights so far, so don't flatter yourself too much.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:34 AM
3

Have you not yet understood that the real problem is gynocentrism, and that regardless of whether feminism exists or not as a movement, society will still be gynocentric even in your scenario - i.e. redistributing resources to women. Always look at the root of the problem, not at the symptom.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:26 AM
2

Nah, gynocentrism is still not enough for a society to be fully matriarchal.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:24 PM
15

We don't even have matriarchy, we've still got gender-binary system that is gynocentric.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:52 PM
2

Yeah, that's sad, even though it's yesterday's news by now
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:23 PM
1

You can recognize a group of people have common interests and tend to act in a common way because of those interests This is a tautology.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:30 PM
1

Right, that's why every time there's a communist uprising, the communist end up rich as shit and everyone else ends up poorer than when they started... It was not real communism (c) Well, you know the typical rhetoric ;D
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:29 PM
23

to seek companionship with women who actually challenge them to be men Say hi to male expendability and gynocentrism, that's what basically lead us to the current state of affairs.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 03:59 PM
7

Absolutely zero shits given. When as a whole group you've been demonized and there's no stopping there, one simply shouldn't care about standards.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:58 PM
7

how it differs from moralistic justice when it comes to many things like custody and false imprisonment as well as different sentences for the same crimes as women but then hide behind it and completely agree and stand by it when it comes to things like this If feminists can do it, so can we.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:44 PM
1

Marxism doesn't say that. If it does not, then why is it using "class" as a term? If all you blame are certain individual capitalists, then you cannot use class rhetoric. Something's not right with your logic here.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:25 PM
1

True
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:24 PM
3

Boy you people sound like such complete fools ALL the time when you spout this crap. I can't even be bothered any more. You're a fucking moron if you think that. You act like like a spoiled brat here. What, people don't buy into your fairy tale and that makes you angry? Marxism can go burn in hell right next to feminism, Mr. "No true Marxism".
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:23 PM
1

Both feminists and conservatives are gynocentric Same as marxists. They do not acknowledge gynocentrism and misandry, so that makes them gynocentric too.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:20 PM
1

Disagree. The Left (specifically Marxists) refuse to acknowledge gynocentrism and men's expendability - so any society they build will be anti-male by definition.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:11 PM
2

What's your point exactly?
/r/MensRights25/07/21 02:00 PM
-1

this shows men and women can't be equal and they shouldn't be Hmm, I don't see how "they shouldn't be" follows, but hey, if men have to suffer, I definitely want women to suffer as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:59 PM
9

Still I see close zero activity on the side of women to support men's issues. We, men, are completely alone in this war, women and the state being together on the other side, and we can only rely on ourselves.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:24 PM
2

If this isn't trolling, then I feel bad for ya.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:25 PM
1

It's because they are your kids. I guess you think your wife's new husband should be paying for your kids? Well, the new family should. No one should force anyone to pay for anybody.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:22 PM
13

are in favor of men's rights, they just focus on the women issues, because they are women Then how are they "in favor" of men's rights? If they are not an ally, they are completely useless to our cause.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:05 PM
8

at the end of the day those women in that hate cult are not the ones pulling the strings or calling the shots I almost felt sympathy for them... just joking, they can all rot alive for all I care.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:51 PM
18

As far as I know, feminism actually are in favor of men's rights What have they done for men so far?
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:47 PM
10

Most women I know don't want anyone to commit suicide. We both know most women don't give a shit about men's issues, and that's the only thing that matters.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:45 PM
3

Sources missing...
/r/MensRights09/07/21 10:58 AM
-1

See, suddenly her supportive behavior ceased, once you've brought up the exclusion of women from a man's life. It's all about self-interest, of course ;D
/r/MensRights09/07/21 10:56 AM
1

Could you elaborate, please?
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:46 PM
3

You've already received reply to this, why are you asking the same question under every post in this thread?
/r/MensRights01/07/21 03:45 PM
1

I wouldn't call our sub conservative ;D
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:44 PM
4

Just like feminists do, right? He feels threatened and discriminated. That would be more than enough for a woman to play victim, but seemingly, not for a man. Those double standards...
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:42 AM
4

Citing Wikipedia (which is of course left-leaning) as a source is not the best move.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:39 AM
0

And I've sent two replies explaining that it js. I already showed it's not, they are anti-male, what's not clear here? Legal rights? More often than not. You'll need data to support this. Don't forget to count anti-male initiatives that were supported by conservatives. Also, I've already mentioned that their anti-male agenda outweighs their "support" with the example of certiorari being declined. Finally, I'm asking that again - are you a tradcon?
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:44 PM
1

Stop right there. Please answer my previous question: Funny that you only picked a single sentence from my entire response. Does it mean you agree with everything else? Yes or no and why. Your argument that in some cases they behave the same as feminists I've spent 2 replies explaining that it's not in "some cases". doesn't invalidate the cases where they protect mens rights from attacks by feminists and the left How often do they protect men's rights against feminist attacks? And don't they pre…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 11:21 AM
2

Funny that you only picked a single sentence from my entire response. Does it mean you agree with everything else? Are you claiming conservatives ARE trying to take away mens due pricess rights? It does not matter whether they try to take away men's due process rights or not. Conservatives want to draft men to wars. They want to make men expendable and support women at the cost of men. Your narrative that they are "better' than feminists because they at least don't cause troubles for men is also…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:50 AM
0

That makes them equal to feminists in this regard. It does, so the question was how they were any better. conservatives are not fighting to take away men's right to due process. Nah, that's not it. Cuckservatives view males as expendable and put women on a pedestal. Resources are to be taken from men and given to women, who are to be protected at all costs. Tradcons are demonstrably anti-male and are the mortal enemy of men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:48 AM
4

/s for sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/06/21 02:54 PM
0

How are they better if they treat men as expendable? They are not better at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 02:52 PM
2

Stop throwing other men under the bus, tradcons are no less cancer than feminists.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 03:27 PM
7

All of that is going to crumble and get replaced by something else, probably once East Asia becomes the main global socioeconomic force. Who will then face the same trajectory. Societies all rise and fall under the same cycles, what you're offering won't break the cycle in any way.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 03:26 PM
18

But white supremacists aren't a mixed bag of good and bad people. Self identified feminists are. Oh boy, the irony here is on the whole 'nother level.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:03 PM
23

Patriarchy is a societal system in which power, money, and status are passed down from male to male nearly exclusively. Thats not a conspiracy. That has existed in many societies historically. According to your definition, it clearly does not exist in the West nowadays, but feminists still believe it does... who's wrong here?
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:01 PM
7

Because most are boomer tradcons, that's why.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 01:57 PM
4

THIS ^^^
/r/MensRights18/06/21 10:49 AM
0

I'm not sure what combat theater that you were in, but other than a few extremely isolated cases, women are not going to improve battlefield effectiveness. I'm not sure it's the case, the main point is that gender-based draft is an abomination.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:17 PM
6

Pretty pathetic decision. I'd make sure I bl*w out her b**ins first.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:40 PM
2

That feel when Botswana does more in terms of gender equality than the entire freaking Western World...
/r/MensRights15/06/21 11:49 PM
3

Let them have the hellscape they made. Don't think it won't affect you. They will try to cover all the damage at your expenses, not theirs.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:02 PM
12

The only winning move is not to play Alas, that's a popular misconception. You cannot win a war waged against you by doing nothing. It's defeatism in its purest and is a dead end. Yes, men get a raw deal while women enjoy privileges, but if you promote non-engagement in politics, you can’t expect men to win, while women fully engage in their own gender politics. You need to stand for an ideal and a cause (not just be against the status quo), strive to help and network with other pro-male men, nu…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 04:35 PM
4

A little victory in an ocean of misandry, huh.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:59 PM
6

Or you can learn to be a better man(or a better person altogether) What do you call better? Better for what?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:18 PM
0

This ^^
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:30 PM
4

Seems legit, but I sense tradcon agenda here. And tradcons are enemies of men as much as feminists.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 11:11 AM
-5

I hate what feminism has done to this society Look deeper. The issue is society's gynocentrism and this has predated feminism for all of humanity's history. Gynocentrism is the core of all evil.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 11:56 AM
2

What happened to building each other up. Never was.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 05:50 PM
2

of course we're not equal on EVERYTHING. Unless that is achieved, there's no such thing as true equality. Nah, I'm from Eastern Europe.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 11:05 AM
2

"Does any of these things really affect me? Maybe they will in the future?" Yes, these things do apply to you and they definitely will affect you. Also, "men and women are VERY equal" was proven to be BS in the comments already, as you've admitted that your country has a conscription for men only, while women are exempt. What equality are we talking about?
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:28 PM
31

I like your attitude
/r/MensRights27/05/21 10:45 AM
6

Better boiled alive, I'd say.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 05:53 PM
5

Depends, sometimes boiling water damages the skin more. Both options are ok though :D
/r/MensRights25/05/21 05:44 PM
10

She needs to have boiling water poured on her face. Eye for an eye.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:56 PM
9

men's issues only matter when it affects other women Glad you've finally awoken. That's the saddest truth of our world.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:30 PM
1

But where do you believe is the problem? The real problem? Male expandability as a result of gynocentrism in human societies. This is the core of all evil.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 05:12 PM
6

Alas, the OP did not decipher the real problem under all this. The actual underlying issue that is the cause of all male suffering is gynocentrism of the society. Accepting male masculinity does not, in any way, resolve the issue of gynocentrism. Just look at tradcon societies - they are still chill on women but overdemanding for men. So nah, what OP wrote is not really the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/21 12:42 PM
1

Nice attempt to run away after you failed to answer my reply or that of u/RockmanXX
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:45 PM
1

Awesome summary, u/RockmanXX
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:26 PM
1

on the physical side, life is about spreading your genes No. The fact that we exist because previous generations spread their genes does not oblige us to anything. You won't be able to prove that there's an objective meaning to life. feelings you likely will never experience Nice try, alas you've failed. Besides, that feeling is worth nothing. Definitely not worth feeding your money to the parasite, with constant threat of losing it all to divorce. Again, he's a literal incel, but I'll answer th…
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:24 PM
5

You do realize you are defeating your own purpose? Men's rights is nothing Please elaborate after the points you've received from me and u/Reasonable_Feed1615 Why are they nothing if men are oppressed and face problems that are exclusively targeted at males, while women are exempt from them? You cannot get away from this that easily without losing your face completely, which you've already lost.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:10 PM
4

Please do address my answers to your questions. So?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:42 PM
3

That wasn't my question. Bitch, you literally asked "have you been conscripted?" I asked about real, tangible impacts I and u/Reasonable_Feed1615 provided you with the exact real tangible things. When was the last time conscription was enforced? It IS STILL ENFORCED IN MY COUNTRY. I literally said it earlier, bitch. Also I've given you the US as an example, I'm not from the US.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:27 PM
4

Imagine I have. So? Why is a male obliged to risk his life, while a female has zero such obligation?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:21 PM
1

Oops, sorry, friendly fire. I thought it was that bitch's reply.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:20 PM
3

Did you call me a bitch because you assumed I was female? Nice try, dumbass, but no, I called you a bitch because you're knowingly lying, trying to gaslight men's issues. name the real, tangible ways that this affects you, and impacts your day to day life Military conscription, bitch, that's what I face in my country. Selective service is what men face in the US. How about that one thing, is that enough for you?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:02 PM
4

a real issue A real issue is men being oppressed by women and government, being seen as nothing but expendable material. That's the real issue. You...get lower grades? Did you specifically ignore 99% of other issues the OP listed, you little lying bitch?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 11:11 AM
2

You did a great job, it did get deleted.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 11:07 AM
1

Are you man or woman btw? A man, who understands where the problem is.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 10:15 AM
2

What is toxic masculinity and or what are toxic masculine traits When a man behaves in a certain way because he's culturally expected to behave like it (usually being a disposable societal unit that serves women and society), eventually this overblown masculinity only causes harm to the men himself, adding towards men disposability trend.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 05:09 PM
2

Is that a poor trolling attempt or you are not willing to engage into a discussion and hence trying to poorly hide your defeat under lousy humor?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:12 PM
3

technically you do so No, he doesn't. It's all your wishy-washy desire to portrait it that way, nothing more.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:05 PM
4

Spreading your genes is what life is for Life's meaning is whatever one wants it to be. Don't pretend like there's any objective meaning to life out there. Someone to live out the last days with? A soulmate? Someone to snuggle with? Here's the reply to your questions, that guy already bothered to extrapolate on the topic much more than I'm willing.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:04 PM
6

but why leave women? I'm not the OP, but why would he need them?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:03 PM
5

I always laugh at all those people in the comment section. As if ANY of them could get any more laid than so called "incels". The truest words were never told (as well as the conclusion you've drawn - absolutely based).
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:02 PM
2

They wouldn't if they talked more, could express their feelings, etc. You know, it would have definitely helped. It's not about "what works for women, works for men", it's about "treating humans in humane way works for both genders". Toxic masculinity does exist and is indeed a factor leading to male disposability. Bottom line: stop listening to tradcons, they are the natural enemy of men's rights and would lead men nowhere but to being disposable.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 11:39 AM
2

And why should I care?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 11:28 AM
7

Women do not need more consideration. The only thing I care about is when men get their share of consideration.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 11:16 AM
7

Google says though men cannot develop cervical cancer, the HPV vaccine may prevent genital warts, penile cancer, anal cancer, and the spread of HPV to sexual partners. So yeah, men should also be vaccinated.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 10:16 PM
4

with a woman who supported him and helps him mentally when he's down, all super supportive A rare case to find. In general, women parasite over men's success, while bringing nothing to the table. As a general rule, a woman only gets interested in a man once she sees his success. She was not there to help him during his hard times, she only wants to share his success, but never the failures. That's a hard pill to swallow, but that's how it is. This and this are good examples of this topic describ…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 01:41 PM
1

Slight tweak, and you’re right- State Socialism has never been attempted large-scale, as a total system. According to your definition, state socialism isn't really possible. And regular socialism (non-state) is actually pretty rampant. It's not. You're confusing socialism with 1 - common resources usage. 2 - cooperatives This is not socialism. Then again, you've got your own definition of socialism, so go with it. I disagree with the entire socialist theory starting from my complete disagreement…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/21 11:00 PM
1

It's always scary to have meetings with women alone in meeting rooms That sweet moment that I'm glad I do not live in a 1st world Western country. But the problems are still problems though.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:53 PM
3

Yeah, seems like that idiot was trolling
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:44 AM
1

Per that definition, socialism has never been built anywhere on a scale larger than a single cooperative in one country. Seems like an argument against socialism in itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/21 10:43 AM
9

Then it SHOULD be.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:22 PM
2

After texts like this, I'll end up supporting decriminalization of domestic violence like Russia did (even though Russia is a hellhole for men).
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:17 PM
4

Look, I'm all for feminism, and all gender movements. Select one. You're either a feminist or an egalitarian. The former is a female supremacy movement, the latter is about equality of genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 12:21 PM
1

No. This pic still instills stereotypes, especially "Know that men will protect she" line - so, you're saying men are expendable and are valued as a meat shield for women, in other words. Hell no.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 10:32 AM
2

Would you be happy if someone said to you that all men should stay at home and look after the kids I would be freaking happy to hear this. Alas, men are treated as expendable subhuman material both by women and the system, so instead of stayting home they are sent off to die in wars, work hard on their jobs only to have everything being taken away from them by divorcing female parasite. So fuck you, u/shrekisthekingofmars
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 10:26 AM
0

just because they call themselves socialist doesn't mean anything Are you claiming they were not socialist? Socialism = ban on private ownership over means of production, instead means of production are controlled by the workers in the form of the Soviet state. So, they were socialist, per very definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 10:13 AM
1

Also they weren't communist, they were state-run capitalism, Wanted to tell you that it's based on revisionist marxists view, but basically, your statement is the point against communism in itself, so I'll let it be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 10:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter