TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AbsolutelyNobody0 Archive

View 0 posts and 402 comments by AbsolutelyNobody0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I see a "you up?" at 1am in your future!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:25 PM
–

Go find a local incel and make him happy. That's the best we can offer a pink piller in this regard...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:23 PM
–

You might be autistic? Not everyone is a cringelord when flirting. IDK what to tell you...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 09:03 PM
1

Just ask them to look around at the quality of young people today. How many are really worth the effort?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 11:27 PM
–

Don't do it if you're not ok with it. Technically, any random woman can use the state to go after you, but there's always a solution even in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 08:34 PM
-4

Cry more lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 06:01 PM
16

Look up stats on young people and drinking. No, we don't go to pubs anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:01 PM
–

I tend to be attracted to younger women because they more often have the qualities I desire. Certain traits have a correlation with age. It's not that deep. If you found me some hot 300 year old chaste fertile elf woman out of a fantasy novel, I wouldn't care about her age. The other traits were the thing actually being measured.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 03:00 PM
2

How exactly should a women choose better It partially depends on what a particular woman is bad at evaluating. As for some general advice, I'd recommend looking at his friends and family. His friends are a reflection of him. His family shows where he came from. You'll need to use your brain to evaluate each particular case and find out what information you can extract. His habits and hobbies also say a lot about him. How he's spending his time should reflect something about him as a person. Is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 12:46 AM
11

We're telling you to take agency over your own life and situation. If you haven't gotten the result you desire, then you need to make different choices hence choose better. If you're unwilling to put in the necesary effort, I'm sure your father will pick out a nice man for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:11 PM
3

This has not been my experience. Only one of my single guy friends obviously want a girlfriend. Most are content doing their own thing. A bit less than half of my guy friends are single. The sample size is smaller for women I know, but their attitudes tend to be more towards wanting a boyfriend. Some are doing their own thing, but it's less common compared to guys I know. Your personal experience is probably more related to who you hang out with than a general trend. Same for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 07:29 PM
-1

Yes, history shows that a loud group of (primarily) lesbians dragged all women into the career world regardless of whether they wanted to be there. You being unaware of the history of women's movements isn't my problem. Women are just as smart and capable as men are I can't say I'm convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:16 AM
0

I'm not a woman, so I don't watch slave porn. It's says more about women with how much they say it's awful, but love seeing it... Your view of traditional is completely based on BS propoganda. Also, traditional doesn't exclude women working. Poor women have always worked throughout all of history. Before technology advanced, even washing clothes was work. Traditional gender norms are primarily about division of labor. Generally speaking, men and women are more suited to certain things. Are there…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 06:07 AM
2

Attention can be compared to a drug. Too much attention too fast leads to an overdose which kills the relationship. Once a tolerance is built up, too little attention can cause withdrawal that kills the relationship. On the flipside, much more attention can be handled without overdosing. As for which flavor(s) of attention you enjoy, that depends on the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:52 PM
1

You might be wondering if this post is bait, cope, insanity, or genius. The answer is yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:27 PM
–

In my dictatorship, only those who are married would have agreed to pay child support. Single motherhood is bad not only for the child but also the mother. This would help discourage it from happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 05:14 PM
1

I definitely wouldn't support the government paying for any of it before or after the child is born.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:45 AM
1

I know nothing of the french or danish policy. How do sperm banks help? Are you just advocating for more single motherhood? How is that different from just having a bastard father?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 01:37 AM
1

Ideally it would be charity organizations or their extended family taking them in. If not, I'll give welfare to the children in the form of orphanages. Maybe we could consider hanging the mother for neglect if the child has to be taken?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 01:34 AM
1

Separation or divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:49 PM
-1

They can give their child up for adoption. If we're going to talk about responsibility, that's actually what I'm focused on for women. There wouldn't be many women having sex before marriage since they wouldn't be willing to risk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:48 PM
0

They signed up for it at that point. Gotta make that supposedly eternal contract mean something.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:43 PM
-2

I would make child support not exist unless the following two conditions are met: The man and woman are/were married. It's verifiably his child. Also, I'm leaning towards abortion illegal and welfare state gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 06:38 PM
5

Being psychologically unwell is a trait that leads to problems for everyone involved. It's worth saying just for the morons who think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:38 PM
2

They likely would drop. I don't necessarily consider that bad. My problem is more with divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:37 PM
0

I didn't know there was such wide-spread machiavellianism within men. Truly a devious bunch!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:25 PM
0

I openly acknowledge that such an experience would suck, but there are worse things in this world. Besides, I'm advocating for 100% illegal divorce to advance the dialectic. We've accepted the premise and now we're negotiating the details. 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:23 PM
0

I'm sure your children were ecstatic sitting in daycare as little kids. They knew their parents were modeling how to be productive members of society. They wouldn't have had it any other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:09 PM
2

Yes yes, women are such victims. Very cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:07 PM
0

Divorce is the destruction of family which is a strong contributor to societal degradation. I think societal degradation is bad. Don't get married and take on that responsibility if a little bit of unhappiness is too much to bear. Also, is it the other person making them unhappy? You certainly framed it that way...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 02:49 PM
-2

You replied to this comment even though it was none of your business. Or was it somehow your business? Curious that...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 02:33 PM
-1

You've done nothing to convince me that the results would be worse than our current situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 01:56 PM
-13

Making divorce 100% illegal wouldn't be as bad as our current situation. I might be willing to negotiate, but my starting position is 100% illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 01:26 PM
-8

Maybe so many marriages wouldn't end if there was someone with more time to focus on the things that matter as opposed to everyone always focusing on getting money. Also, we could just make divorce illegal. Fixed the insurance problem for ya!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 01:04 PM
9

Every relationship is a negotiation. In a forced relationship such as a parent to a child, you seem to be advocating for the tyrannical dictator over the trusted leader. You'll certainly get out of it what you put in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 12:57 PM
-10

Ahh yes, married women are notoriously kept off of their husband's health, dental, and vision insurance. Vacations are strictly only something the husband does as well. The reality is that a lot of women would be more fulfilled and more effective if they put their efforts into furthering their family as opposed to sacrificing their children on the altar of career. You may have less money at the end of it, but I'd argue many women stand to gain things much more valuable than money if they took an…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 12:50 PM
3

You want an artist who isn't mentally ill? 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 10:01 PM
3

listens to male “empowerment” podcasts (hard no) So my Sigma Male Affirmations™ are a problem?!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 09:53 PM
–

Since I don't want to be intimate with you, you're fine if I make fun of you, right? People make fun of all sorts of things. Either ignore their opinions or stop openly liking those things. As for Taylor Swift, I don't care if anyone likes her music, but I think it's stupid how much focus some women give her. There's no way she's that interesting. Astrology lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 06:32 PM
2

The whole metoo thing and being openly highly sexual are antithetical. The latter leads to us not believing the former, and we're not wrong to think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 06:23 PM
-1

I figured someone would get a chuckle out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 05:45 PM
6

Certainly a turn-off.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 06:58 AM
-5

Lacking motherly qualities (not feminine) Is a mother Promiscuous Left wing (obviously) Piercings (ears are acceptable, but not enjoyed) Tattoos (any) Overweight Fake nails, dyed hair, fake lashes, overdone make-up (if it sticks out, it's too much) No female friends Bad female friends Phone addict Instagram e-whore (you know what i mean) Entitled Bad hygiene Dumb Ugly I think that covers most of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 03:30 AM
1

Who asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 03:09 AM
1

Nah, promiscuity is clown shit in general but especially for women. Hopefully your doctor friend manned up and made sure his hoe wife got into a boating accident. Restart fresh.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 03:06 AM
2

Maybe try the political party events/rallies for whichever party you support? Or just date whoever and screen out the women who aren't worth your time. A coastal city is bound to have a higher proportion of garbage dating options for you than other places, but surely not all of them will be garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 02:58 AM
1

Depends what you mean by quantified. Can it be quantified as strictly as the motion equation for throwing an object? No. Are there changed statistical likelihoods based on different quantifiable traits? Absolutely. While there may be no absolute formula, we wouldn't bother discussing attraction if it couldn't be measurably influenced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 09:57 AM
8

That's the 'waiting at the finish line to pick the winner' strategy. You definitely won't receive the same consideration as a woman who was along for the journey when he had nothing. If that doesn't bother you and you can live up to the higher standards, then go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 06:48 PM
0

Government mandated girlfriends are the obvious solution. This is a perfectly reasonable post discussing things completely rationally.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 05:44 PM
9

Obviously they're not doing well. Just as men are finding their own solutions, women can do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 10:48 PM
1

It's not particularly relevant. There is no solution to be had. It's not like you can put the genie back in the bottle. Having children is something to be taken seriously. Consequently, whether you have sex with someone is also something to be taken seriously because it can lead to a child. Not sleeping around at least partially solves this problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 06:14 PM
-1

So men provided and women were caretakers? If you squint, it looks like something might be carved on that stone...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 04:48 AM
2

Doesn't matter to me. She'll get on board my train or get left at the station. If she's not going where I'm going, I don't want her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 11:54 PM
-1

If all major cultures across all of history have all generally followed these guidelines, I think it might somewhat be set in stone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 11:50 PM
2

The hypothetical reality where I have my current thought processes and took those actions don't exist. That being said, I would be annoyed. Either because she lied about having a boyfriend or because she's out of line for going to a bar solo and flirting with a guy and accepting a drink when she's not single.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 11:43 PM
-2

So controversial yet so brave... Not my reasons for answering that way, but you're kinda based in your own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 08:11 PM
-3

Women should have equal opportunities? No. Women should be allowed to vote? No. Women should be allowed to enter the workforce? Yes. Violence against women is wrong? No. Women should be allowed to pursue higher education? Yes. I could go into detail on all of these, but I find it more amusing to leave it as is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 06:58 PM
0

Let's not needlessly paint China and Russia as the boogieman. They could disappear tomorrow and these issues would continue. Why? Because they will never hold a candle to how much our own governments psyop us.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:45 PM
–

Why did you decide to cook yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 10:48 PM
–

Haha so cringe!💀💀💯💯💯💯😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 04:46 AM
–

Belittle it at your own peril. Nothing you're saying actually argues against my point. People have killed for far less than the continuation of an unbroken chain of lineage spanning more than 4 billion years.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 04:17 AM
–

Reality is indifferent to your feelings or morals. Any sufficiently large disaffected group that cannot get redress for their grievances could decide that overthrowing the system is the solution. Of course we're not there (yet), but let's not pretend it's impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 03:59 AM
5

Good to know your opinions hold no value. You think adults can't make friends lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 07:44 PM
12

And did those social circles just form from the ether? Or was it strangers just deciding to interact with each other until they became friends and formed a group? Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 07:28 PM
0

The solution to this is obvious. Just don't give a fuck what women want. Do you give a fuck what men want? No? Then just keep that same energy with women. If they've got a problem, they can deal with that themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 06:59 PM
–

Whatever, birthing person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 06:52 PM
–

Your view on history is retarded to say the least. Women were not perpetual victims throughout history. Also, your view on getting a taste of ones own medicine is also retarded. It can only be ones own medicine if you've done some action before. In the case where I accepted your completely ahistorical view, this would just be a 'sins of the father are the sins of the son' type of analysis. You belong in a padded cell for the safety of everyone around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 06:40 PM
–

Can I just say that it's not milk unless it comes from a mammary gland? Our entire class of animals (mammals) are named after one gland that is unique to us. I refuse to let some stupid nut steal out thunder. I blame women for this; biologists gave women their credit, but women keep trying to give it away!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 06:26 PM
5

Based on the clup, tests was a bad way of framing what he was actually saying. He literally just wanted to know if she had anything going on in her life. The standards didn't even sound that difficult to meet. Besides that, men and women are different. There are different standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 05:40 PM
–

This is either bait or cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 04:22 PM
2

Just looked in the emojis for 'sparkle'
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 02:20 AM
80

If a guy isn't genetically blessed, he's going to need to put in hard work to become someone who can get a hookup. Of course the woman never sees the hard work; she wants it to feel as if things ✨just happened✨, but that's rarely the reality. More often than not, he had to develop some sort of skill in order to become that guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 08:10 PM
1

I know nothing of his situation, but I presume he is wealthy. He could start with having those who've wronged him killed. Since the justice system has been perverted to this extent, I expect that society will eventually learn the real reason that system was developed. Hint: It has nothing to do with rehabilitation of criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 06:00 AM
–

Intelligence definitely receives much more weight than education for me. I've met many highly educated midwits. Genuinely intelligent people are much better company. That being said, the standard for intelligence in a partner is pretty binary for me; either she passes or she doesn't, but going above and beyond won't earn her bonus points.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 05:44 AM
2

She could definitely find a guy if she went to the right places and makes sure she's not completely unapproachable. Basically just becoming open to the idea that she too can be in a relationship would get her there. Only watched a few minutes. Not my type of content.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 01:26 AM
16

My gym bans filming, and I fully endorse it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 03:44 AM
1

Nah, crime of passion tends to be manslaughter. Just do it when you're pissed right after you find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:35 PM
2

I think it's often misframed as women having standards that are too high when in reality their standards are too rigid and/or stupid. Some 5 foot tall woman can't tell the difference between a guy who is 6 feet tall and 5 feet 11 inches, yet she'll still have a rigid standard of a man being 6 feet tall. Her standards primarily serve to impede her own success. As for the sluts, I don't think they're all sluts, but the breakdown is that ~90% fall into one of the following categories - sluts, forme…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 02:36 PM
1

Guys, the solution is simple for this paternity issue. Of course, it starts with doing your best to choose a woman who wouldn't cheat and remaining vigilant for possibly issues. If she still cheats and you find out too late, then you can just kill her when you find out. You were already serving a life sentence, so manslaughter charges couldn't be worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 02:01 PM
6

The subhuman garbage continues to be a detriment to us all. It's a bit strange that they call themselves 'mods' or 'management' these days though...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 02:22 AM
4

Most men who get accused of hating women online are falsely accused, so obviously the falsehood doesn't translate into reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 12:17 AM
1

It's a nice thought, but I'm not convinced. At least in the US, women are just as fat as men. And no, it's not cute when women are fat. The reality is that even if all men were in shape and all women were fat, women would still behave the way they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 07:22 PM
–

You're conflating sexual attraction and sexual compatibility. You don't have to have sex with someone to find them sexually attractive. Also, even if you think someone is sexually attractive, it doesn't mean you find them generally attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 03:43 PM
4

Give me the giant red button that will evaporate all sluts. Make my day.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 01:31 AM
–

For now, I only care that they don't use US tax dollars or doing dumb shit in the name of the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 11:12 PM
–

I do keep that energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 01:20 PM
1

But I know how they choose to present themselves!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 09:37 PM
1

I do hope doctors will one day find a cure for blindness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 08:58 PM
2

No, they should cover up more. i'm tired of seeing whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 05:54 PM
–

It's only partially about being the right woman. A big part is finding the right man. You could become an incredibly attractive woman, but if you only interact with and choose guys that aren't right for you, you'll only continue to suffer
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:23 AM
–

You had sex, got attached, and built up your hopes, but all he wanted was sex. If you don't want to be hurt like that, the simplest solution is to not allow yourself to get too attached before you have commitment. Sex builds attachment - especially for women. If you don't like the ouput you're getting, try changing the input.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:05 AM
–

Because I can set whatever arbitrary standards as I please. I think casual sex is gross, and I think I can find who I'm looking for without having to compromise on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 12:35 AM
–

She has no dating value to me at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 12:22 AM
–

There definitely are dudes who are lying, but I think you're overestimating. By 23, I had rejected more women than most (maybe all?) of your friends have been with. These women weren't even particularly bad options; I just wasn't into them and don't like casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 05:02 PM
4

I definitely wouldn't be in a relationship with a woman who has slept around. I wouldn't even date her if I knew she'd slept around. I don't have casual sex at least partially because I think it damages the woman. Personally, I don't think I can claim to care about her well-being if I add to that problem. With that being said, I'm not convinced that engaging in casual sex despite that belief would be predatory. Callous or uncaring is a more apt description in my eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 06:09 AM
4

I'm not convinced that what you're describing is a rejection that is analogous to a man asking a woman out and being rejected. In the case of a man asking a woman out, she is usually rejecting him because he lacks the qualities she desires. It's specific to him, but she's open to accepting the right person. In the case of a man only wanting to sleep with a woman, it's usually the case that those guys are only open to sex and not interested in serious relationships. Nobody could be right for that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:01 PM
1

I think your experience is more reflective of your behavior and how you're choosing women and not reflective of women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 01:30 PM
2

Constitutions are just pieces of paper at the end of the day. If a critical mass no longer wishes to abide by it, then it's essentially gone. Also, you would move to a different country and vote for the same self-terminating policies. At best, you'd only be delaying things. The reality is that something will have to give in order to avoid the death spiral.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 03:06 PM
2

TBH, I just rule these women out on the front end. I'm not going to ask her to change. So few young women dress respectably these days which makes things difficult, but I'm more than happy to ride solo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 10:53 PM
2

I agree that they won't go live in the forest. To 'check out' is not to live in the forest; it's generally inaction that tends towards weakening whatever is being checked out of. They can check back in if a more appealing paradigm presents itself. If we don't course correct and our society ever reaches this point, then I'd expect something akin to Islam to take over. Have fun with all your freedom while you have it! Your grand-daughters sure won't...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 09:30 PM
14

I believe the freedom and access is a temporary state that will be destroyed by itself. If enough men are left out, then they will check out. I'm not sire what the critical mass is, but everyone will lose that freedom and access when it's reached. If the freedom and access will lead to the destruction of that freedom and access, then it cannot be good because of its inherent instability.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:37 PM
–

At least back then, they fought like hell to survive and thrive. There was definitely something that existed thrn that they thought was worth living for. I think there are many men today who cannot relate to that notion. They'd simply roll over and die if it weren't so easy to survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 10:20 PM
–

Beauty itself is largely defined by health. Healthy skin and hair as well as healthy body proportions are most of what defines beauty. All of these things are indicators of fertility as well. Obviously we evolved to select for these traits since they're useful for propogation of the species. We're stuck with that evolution now, and I see no reason to seek to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 08:45 PM
–

Sure, baggage varies quite a bit, but let's not pretend there's not a pattern or correlation. Considering we don't have infinite time to look at all women individually, we just use age as a simple filtering technique. If we take a random single 22 year old woman and a random single 30 year old woman, the random single 22 year old is much more likely the more attractive option. It's for a lot of reasons, but I don't care to create a statistics lesson.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 05:11 PM
–

Your first paragraph implies that you don't understand the idiom and took it literally. What personal insult? Are you talking about the autism comment? I don't see potential autism as an insult, but apparently you do. I only said it because you seemed incapable of understanding basic non-literal language. It's a serious condition that hinders people's lives; if you have it and don't realize, you could be suffering unnecessarily. Sure, age isn't a perfect heuristic for baggage or even fertility, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 02:06 PM
–

Nobody is saying to literally lock them down. It's an idiom. You should get checked for autism. Also, guys wanting a younger woman is not just for beauty. It's also about fertility and avoiding baggage. The average never-married 35 year old is going to be much less fertile and have a lot more baggage than the average never-married 25 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:16 PM
-2

They posted it publicly for the world to see. You just used an advanced search method to find it. No hacking or anything. Sounds fair to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:47 AM
4

If you won't date a slave owner, then you'd better not buy an iphone or nikes! You're driving the demand for slavery, so you cannot judge the slaver.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:43 AM
1

It wouldn't be effective in the sense that men would believe it and buy the product because of that. It would have a decent chance of pissing off leftists because many of them hate anything positive about men. In that way, it might be effective if men choose to buy it just because it makes leftists angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 10:13 PM
–

I absolutely do not expect it from myself or others. I regard it as generally inadvisable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 10:08 PM
3

Your post says misandry doesn't exist then goes on to accept that misandry does in fact exist. You just want to brush it off or excuse it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You brain function seems to have been retarded at some point in your development. Hopefully you're able to find a remedy for your ailment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 10:00 PM
0

I'm going to assume no dating experience includes no sexual experience. I'd dress in a nice and feminine but non-sexual manner. This means no overly tight, skimpy, or exposing clothes. I'd exercise, have good hygiene, and maintain a sufficiently healthy diet. No body paint as 'clothes' while exercising either... I'd be sure to befriend other likeminded women and avoid women whose values aren't in alignment with mine. I would not post on social media unless it was a private account. Even then, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 02:33 AM
3

That line at the end gave me a good laugh. The relationships in the south aren't as bleak as the statistics show, but it's not great here either. I regularly see big guys at my gym wearing dragonball shirts. They're clearly doing well in their training arc at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 04:50 PM
3

Being naive, lacking discretion, or not learning from your mistakes are character flaws. At some point, it definitely is their fault. Where you draw that line is up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 03:11 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:56 PM
-2

Generally speaking, I'm unconcerned with what other countries are doing. As for the view of women only transport in my country, I think it ought to be forbidden for anything run by the government. If a private company wanted to do it, then so be it, but I'd also allow a men only or ’insert race' only transport company as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 01:28 PM
1

Men 'not caring about a woman's career' is more of a colloquial way of saying that her earnings don't matter when selecting a woman. Obviously her job will indicate certain things about her which can be useful to read into. OF girls and strippers are obviously whores. Lawyers are disagreeable. The career of choice can be useful to assess who she is as a person, but I can't see why I'd care about it beyond that. Personally, I would not want the mother of my children to be doing some stupid 40hr/w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 04:13 AM
5

Yeah, many women would have everyone placate their social anxiety and let the human species die rather than allow themselves to ever feel any discomfort. Just ignore it all. Do as you please.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 01:05 PM
-1

1: Disagree. Anyone who believes that would avoid all women. They're free to do so. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: I disagree with this being applicable to women generally. Any woman any of these are applicable to is not worth being with anyway. 7: I do think relationships are more transactional than people like to believe. This is not limited to just sexual relationships or satisfaction. Emotional bonds do hold power too alongside the transactional bonds. 8: For some men, this may be true. It's not fully clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 07:23 PM
0

Yes and no. Taking advice from people who have proven experience of achieving the goals you desire for yourself is advisable. With that being said, we'll often see 35-45 year old spinsters trying to give advice to younger women about relationships and dating; the advice these spinsters give is most valuable if you also want to be a 35-45 year old spinster. It's rather uncommon that someone will be able to offer useful advice for an experience or desire that is entirely detached from their own ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 07:02 PM
1

The only part I agree with is the first sentence. A lot of men are not desirable. The rest is complete bs. It's not surprising that a lot of men aren't desirable. This has always been the case for some subset of men throughout history, but these days those numbers have definitely grown. It's likely due to a number of factors ranging from all the chemicals we consume, cultural decay, gender discrimination, and institutional structures disfavoring boys just to name a few. The dirth of attractive m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:46 PM
-1

I never supported bullying women into lowering their standards, but now that you brought it up, it does sound quite amusing. I will now support this if only for my own amusement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:52 PM
8

Ma'am, this is a Wendy's. Well, maybe it's not, but it's definitely not a passport bro forum. I don't know why you're acting like it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 04:38 AM
1

To some extent, this is fair, but there are other solutions to the problems you brought up that can be preferrable. Keep this same energy for women!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 12:15 AM
–

Nah, more government bureaucracy isn't going to solve this. This isn't to say government hasn't helped to induce this issue and that it can't help solve it, but the solution doesn't require more bueaucracy. You're on the right track by going for a solution that creates certain incentives for certain behaviors, but it's going about creating those incentives in the wrong way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 07:14 PM
0

-Working is optional I could have $100 billion and any woman I'm with is still going to work; it may not be for some corporation, but she will work. -Respect him more because he is masculine and competent Equating rich with masculine is rich in its own way. -Ability to take better care of your appearance. For example being able to afford personal trainers, get hair done, botox, nails done, eyelash extensions, skincare etc Personal trainers don't keep you thin; Nutrition does. Botox, fake nails, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 04:28 PM
2

Let's say he does find younger women more physically attractive. So what? Even at your peak physical attractiveness, there are already other women more physically attractive than you. So is your argument that all relationships are bad unless you're the most attractive woman on the planet?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 12:18 AM
2

I can't say anything about where the relationships or marriages would go, but the politicians might descend 6ft if they try it again. I don't think people are going to have any of it...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 02:43 PM
1

May the unbroken lineage spanning the entire history of the existence of life perish with you! As for the rest of us, we can just treat you like a pariah in order to ensure that your beliefs will die along with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 01:27 PM
1

I don't date in a context where we've never met before, but if I did, I would take absolutely no steps for her to 'fear me less.' If she fears me, that's her problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 08:20 PM
2

You don't need to try to convince men to watch lesbian porn...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 02:09 PM
5

Any given woman could be batshit crazy, and batshit crazy women have been emboldened via the misdeeds of MeToo. Guys who have something to lose by running into a batshit crazy woman often aren't going to take the risk of finding out if she's batshit crazy. It only makes sense. Do your own risk assessment to see if it's worth it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:26 PM
-1

No, and she's not mine if she's been on birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:04 PM
0

Nah, the entire education system is broken. It's a contributating factor why most 18 year olds today are pretty worthless. If people got a proper education, they wouldn't need anyone to tell them how to handle this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:55 PM
2

This makes no logical sense. It implies that if a man ever approaches a woman in any context (online or in person), then he has no options and is unattractive. If you had options, you wouldn't need to 'bother' strangers? Then if you had options, you wouldn't need to be on dating apps. See how this is stupid? You're very consistent with your braindead takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 04:46 PM
–

If this is what you got from that discourse, then hopefully all women get the same message. While it's not perfect, it's far superior to the casual sex hookup culture that's propogated throughout society. Ideally, there would be a more wholistic consideration about this, but improvements will be incremental at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:12 PM
–

I'm fine with it. Of all the problems with modern dating and relationships, differing treatment based on attractiveness isn't really one of them. When it comes to women who sleep with certain guys quickly, I don't rule them out because they might have different standards for me or some other guys; I rule them out because they're whores. That they would engage in 'casual' sex (an oxy moron) at all is one of the real problem ailing dating and relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:32 PM
1

Neither, but let's assume it's a gun to my head scenario. The 50 year olds are just not attractive. The fat women are a repelling force on attraction sometimes crossing into disgust. Based on this, the obvious choice is the one who is essentially neutral as opposed to repulsive...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:17 PM
1

It would reduce her attractiveness. If a girl did as you described and looked as you described, she'd need just about everything else about her to be in alignment with what I desire for me to actually enter a relationship with her. It's unlikely but not impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:07 PM
3

Fake shit is typically repulsive. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 01:44 PM
3

His first paragraph was a list of things he wouldn't know without RP. Not stuff he still believes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:20 AM
1

Please never have children. You're going to damage them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:51 PM
1

You'll fail to raise children into proper adults if you don't provide a framework to view the world. They can change the framework later, but they need something to build from. For example, how many genders are there? And can someone change their gender? You're going to have to help them make sense of the world around them. What you choose to teach is informed by your beliefs. Also, you believe that children need to be kind, respectful, and responsible. I don't agree because I don't share your b…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:42 AM
2

You need a homogenous culture for this to even be a possibility. I do think such a society is much more stable. Whether the results are better depends on the culture and your beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 11:54 PM
2

Try raising children. Whose belief system do you use to help them build a framework of the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 11:46 PM
4

These are the obvious critiques that I always understood, but it leaves at least one avenue where this choice can still make the most sense. If a guy doesn't have any problem attracting women in his home country but simply doesn't find those women attractive, then going somewhere with attractive women makes sense. As an example, maybe he lives in a religious country, and he doesn't like the religion. While women who don't follow the religion may exist, they're sufficiently rare that it's worth t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:31 PM
1

Pretty much though I may not frame it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 09:29 PM
1

I don't set marriage as the standard. Ideally it would be the standard, but there are a number of problems with my society and culture that make marriage a bad measure. I won't have sex unless I'm willing to raise a child with her. Pregnancy may not be the goal, but it's always a potential outcome. If she's not someone I could raise a child with, she's definitely not someone I should be having sex with. This is going further than basic 'non promiscuity,' but I believe it's a good strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:46 PM
5

Communism is known for leading to very successful societies. Eastern europe is the paragon of society. Thanks for at least making the argument that promiscuity certainly doesn't make a society healthy...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 02:50 PM
9

Then I'm sure you understand some of the underlying problems. This attitude didn't fall out of the sky. If they saw a worthwhile path to a better outcome, they'd follow it. But right now, the path for many is very difficult for only marginal improvement. They're not seeing the value in more effort, and I can't say they're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 10:14 PM
15

Sure, whatever helps you feel justified in ignoring their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:51 PM
28

Lots of men are checking out. Why would you expect anything different? What do they get if they put in a lot of effort? If their level of effort doesn't significantly change their results, they have no incentive to do anything more than low effort. Also, a lot of what is considered 'stylish' for women is just unattractive in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:22 PM
3

There are a number if reason, but it's generally counterproductive for the life I desire. While it's not an absolute predictor for the things I wish to avoid, but it's simply not a risk factor I need to include in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:40 PM
2

I find promiscuity unattractive. I don't care if it was with women, men, or martians. Even for men, I won't be close with guys who move that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 06:50 PM
1

It's a nice thought, but it's just not how people actually work. People will not work tirelessly to improve a society that they have no investment in perpetuating into the future. The malaise is an indication that many people subconsciously think this society is broken and deserves to collapse. While women can improve, they can't unbake the cake. They can't un-hoe the hoe, and men can't be expected to desire them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 01:57 PM
1

Men paying is a relic from a bygone era where men knew with reasonable certainty that the woman was worth providing for. She would properly reciprocate the gesture. They both followed their respective roles. There were outliers to these rules, but it was generally a safe bet. These days, you're very unlikely to find a woman who could get close to living up to the standards of that era. Even if you do run into such a woman, you can't know ahead of time. It's simply foolish to waste money on a los…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:19 PM
3

Quite frankly, there is no point in most men doing as you advocate. You're saying that men should strive to become well-rounded, successful, and behave traditionally, but by traditional standards, most women are absolutely disqualified from being considered traditional. Even if all guys did as you say, the numbers dictate that the number of viable women would be woefully insufficient. Average guys would have to accept 'reformed hoes' or nothing at all. I'm not shocked lots of dudes are looking t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 04:35 PM
3

I am a 6'6 Jacked dude that is rich, assertive and i would call myself a "traditional male" and i still enjoy being gay, f*ck you. This post is bait. You had to know the comments were gonna clown on you, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:59 PM
5

True, there doesn't exist a filter in our brains that prohobits us from talking about emotions. We simply wouldn't do it, or at least not in the way I see women doing it. And our methods are not wrong. For the sake of those little boys in the future: please do not treat boys as defective girls. You'll end up abusing them if you just treat their differences as societal conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 02:29 AM
9

It's an understandable reaction from him. Many things men do that help each other would be considered too harsh, confrontational, or unrelateable for most women. There would be very few discussions about feeings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 11:25 PM
1

When you have two people having sex, it is never clear-cut. There is no perfect knowledge, but if you genuinely think these issues are that ambiguous, it only really explains how you're choosing to engage with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:59 PM
1

Your response at least gave me a chuckle due to literally every piece of it being incorrect. Your question was specifically related to knowing if someone who had sex with you sees you as sexually attractive. You chose to specifically talk about the context of sexual attraction as opposed to general attraction or anything else. If them being sexually attracted to you matters to you, then why did you have sex with them without believing them to be sexually attracted to you? Did you just wrongly be…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 08:03 PM
1

As far as I know, mind reading technology hasn't been invented yet. I don't think wondering about this is very useful. I'm more curious about why you care to know if a man is genuinely sexually attracted to you. Does it make a difference to you somehow?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 02:30 PM
0

Society only exists because men deem it so. Feel free to shit on Atlas, but you can't be surprised when the sky falls. Simply put, reality has a way of clearing these issues up. I mean women can easily get sex outside of relationships and can create a family on their own. But men will still somehow blamed for single mothers? Your narratives are conflicting. Whereas, men in the past paid for their partners whole existence. Just remember that it was women who created the sexual revolution and viol…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 04:16 AM
–

Nah, it's the other way around. I know my standards are fairly rigid, but I often see other people compromising on what they say they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 02:32 PM
1

I think I'd lean against it, but maybe I could be persuaded as long as I could be assured that all governments and corporations wouldn't also have access to that data. So no essentially.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 12:59 AM
3

Why is she my girlfriend if she's fat? I can't relate to this hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 05:40 PM
1

I will openly admit to having high standards (though not necessarily the standards you listed) for women, but it's not really a problem in my experience. Average women in the US are unattractive, so obviously I'm not going to go for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 01:38 PM
–

Knowledge is limited to the realm of humans while information is independent of humans. For example, the information of how to spell the english word "lose" exists, but that has nothing to do with you not having that knowledge. If you want to look into a crippled scientific discipline, then look no further than the discipline that aims to understand reality itself. Physics has been parayzed for half a century. Good luck making any technological innovations when those eggheads are so far up their…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 02:04 AM
–

There's more information and less knowledge in today's society. As for more innovation, choose any 50 year time period from like 1810 to 1970. Many scientific disciplines have stalled out over the last 50 years which in turn leads to a loss in innovation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 12:53 AM
–

Society and conditions did not improve in the last 50 years? Not really? The things that already existed just got cheaper. And society has completely degraded over that time. Don’t we double our knowledge like every year since we have the internet? How do you even quantify that? If the amount of useless information doubles, then does that still count? Did the internet not came to be in that timeframe. Old tech got applied at scale and improved some. Besides, clearly the internet has been as much…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 10:37 PM
0

Society and the species propogated and conditions improved. The writing on the wall isn't showing that marriage 2.0 will have such good results...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 01:27 PM
28

Marriage 2.0 isn't taken seriously because it's not binding. The fact that it has harsh consequences despite having little enforcement makes it inherently bad. Bad incentive structures cannot be praised. Marriage 1.0 worked for all of history and now that we have marriage 2.0, a lot of people are choosing to check out entirely. Clearly it's not working.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 03:06 AM
9

Galaxy S23 is $800. Iphone 14 is $800. You are high to say only one of these is cheap. Besides, both of them are overpriced considering what we actually use them for.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:28 PM
1

Any sort of obsession is a turn off. Clothes that amount to little more than body paint are also a turn off. I'd be willing to go on a date with such a woman as long as the clothes she wears aren't too ridiculous, but that's only because tight and skimpy clothes are so ubiquitous today. Ideally, nobody would wear those sorts of things out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 11:50 PM
1

It wouldn't get that far without being addressed. If it was addressed and still continued to that point, then she'd be out the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:27 PM
9

Losing the top 20% of your 10,000 options certainly feels like a greater rejection than losin the top 20% of your 10 options. One person is now getting rejected by 2,000 people that would've said yes in the past while the other only lost 2 options. In terms of absolute value, the womans experience seems worse, but it's more to do with our pschology than reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 04:53 PM
2

Go read my comments again. You're imputing a belief or motive I never described. In fact, I never even said whether or not I actually live my life in a way that the op complains about. The reality is that there needn't be any hyprocrisy to desire something you are not. Otherwise, being straight would itself be hypocrisy. Hypocrisy stems from belief, but if the particular desire is not founded in belief, there can be no hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 10:06 PM
1

Amateur hour... If she uses instagram for anything but looking at memes, then she's not the one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 07:57 PM
1

I don't think you get it... Man A: I desire a woman who is not now nor has ever been promiscuous. Man B: But you are promiscuous. How can you justify that desire? Man A: When did my desires have any relation to what I am? You don't have to justify your desires because they may not have anything to do with your beliefs. We may think a desire is ludicrous based on how unlikely we perceive it to be, but that doesn't mean it's something that needs to be justified. An obese person desiring a fitness …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 07:50 PM
6

Since when did anyone have to justify what they desire? You desire to be in a relationship with a woman, yet you are not a woman. How will you justify this hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 07:25 PM
1

Nothing in the memes text/image says they won't. Notice how it's condition A along with condition B as opposed to saying condition A because it means they'll have condition B.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 06:20 PM
2

If nothing else, the obvious is that they're not likely to be fat and not likely to get fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 12:55 AM
–

The consistency of braindead takes I see from you is astonishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 09:21 PM
17

If a group that makes up 50% of the population (men) commits 90% of murders, then it's justification to hate all who fit in the 50%. Let's follow the logic: If a group that makes up 13% of the population (unnamed) commits 50% of murders, then it's justification to hate all who fit in the 13%. I don't think we want to go there, do we? If statistical disproportionality related to a bad action is justification for generalized hatred, then you might be signing up for a world of hatred. Maybe you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 04:34 PM
2

I'm indifferent to what any woman's internal monologue tells herself about her ability to attract me. If I had female friends who thought they could get with me whenever they want, then clearly they don't know why I consider them a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 10:35 PM
1

Desire and scarcity set value.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 11:34 PM
4

You've created a hypothetical that asks us to remove human nature from humans. Really, this hypothetical even removes nature itself from humans. To even attempt to assess this hypothetical would require that we look outside of nature, but I'm not one to care for the supernatural. I think I've heard some religions have conceptions of heaven that are similar to this, so maybe you can look into how they conceptualize such an idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 01:36 PM
1

Intelligence and leadership are not really that closely linked. When boys are growing up, the lessons they must learn in order to succeed in life tend towards teaching leadership skills. Not only this, but different biology (for example higher testosterone) helps nurture this trait. As a guy, you're unlikely to ever get a girl if you can't show some initiative and leadership capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 12:07 AM
4

If that's your image of men, then feel free to stay single, don't have kids, and die alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 07:36 PM
0

None of this has anything to do with love. Based on this post, I'm inclined to believe you have some odd misconceptions about love.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 03:42 AM
1

FDS is to women what they imagine red pill/patriarchy/villain-of-the-day to be to men. They've defined their role in the story to be that of the villain and then call themselves the hero. It's comical in a way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 03:43 AM
4

For the sake of her mental and physical health. For the important relationships in her life. For the clear conscience knowing that she's done her best to avoid adding to the problems that plague our society.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 11:09 PM
1

Being against abortion and pursuing casual sex is not inherently hypocritical. The same goes for sleeping around and desiring to marry a chaste woman. I suppose these could be hypocritical given the right circumstances, but it's certainly not necessarily true. Also, most (if not all) people who oppose abortion do so on some moral grounds. To imply that opposition to abortion is immoral would be rather hollow to those who oppose abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 12:06 AM
2

1 - 9 are all overweight and I wouldn't date them. 8 comes the closest to acceptable. Is it just me or does 7's body look like a dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 12:47 AM
2

Being a doctor is simply a fancy trade skill for those with with better than average memorization skills to help them get more expensive pieces of paper in order to earn more money. Don't hype them up as being some noble class of high quality people. They exhibit just as much vice as the rest of the populace. As for successful men in general, monetary success does not equate to being a high quality person.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 02:40 PM
3

I believe that those who embrace these ideas will destroy themselves, and I have little intention of getting in their way. As long as they limit themselves to only destroying themselves, there's no issue for me. I will insulate/protect myself and those I care for from their incoherent beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 04:22 PM
3

You can love your children, parents, siblings, friends, and any other number of people. That does not mean you enter a romantic/sexual relationship with any of these people. Clearly we can see that 'love' and 'entering a romantic/sexual relationship' are two separate concepts. Clearly, your theory is incomplete.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 03:27 PM
1

I'd hope not considering the fact that a man who has all sorts of porn fantasies has not practiced restraint.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 07:16 PM
12

I'll give my logic on this. I want a woman who values and understands restraint, and I want her to have learned this early enough in life such that she doesn't cause too much damage to herself and others. A woman who fits this criteria will naturally have fewer sexual partners. If I meet a woman who has had many sexual partners, then she has already removed herself from consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 04:30 PM
3

Also just to add, these numbers are only limited to marriages. Personally, I wouldn't marry unless she earned more or there was an ironclad prenup. In other words, guys like me can skew your numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 03:06 AM
2

"When the BLS looked instead at marriages where both partners are in paid work, it found that only 29 percent of women earn more than their husbands." Read your own links and try again...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 03:02 AM
4

I think your assessment is flawed which is leading you to incorrect predictions. One such flaw being the notion that the sexual revolution benefits men. The reality is that it allows for rampant hedonism by a small portion of men. It's hard to say anyone truly benefits from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 12:55 AM
3

The whole 'men and women being friends' thing seems like it's an experiment of modernity in the first place. I'm not aware of it being common for men and women to be close friends throughout history, yet there was no breakdown between men and women. If anything, the breakdown of male/female relationships has coincided with the rise in acceptance of male/female friendships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 01:02 PM
2

I may not be the exact person this post is intended for. do you even like women as people? No, but neither do I dislike them. Do you deep down see women as equals? No. Even identical twins aren't equal. Do you think women and men can connect intellectually and that such a connection is the basis for a relationship? It's possible. Do you expect to do half of the work at home? Boring non sequitur question. Skip...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 05:37 PM
1

Nobody. Facts are facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 11:24 PM
2

Nurses have a reputation for being hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 11:22 PM
1

Username: yoganurse21 As we can see, nurses have certain stereotypes for a reason... This is textbook monkey branching. Whether it's technically cheating or not is irrelevant because it's 100% the action of a low quality human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 06:15 PM
2

Low quality men do in fact like low quality women. This is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:56 AM
2

Individualism is incorrectly applied in this situation. You can technically be on either side of this argument and favor individual liberties. I would argue that a more accurate stem for the 'blue pill' thought process as you describe it is 'tabula rasa' or blank slate theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 08:53 PM
9

If sex is a reward, then it's a transaction. You might as well go to a prostitute at that point as there is no meaningful difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:37 PM
2

Whether or not it affects marriage rates wasn't really the point of the concern. The actual concern was more related to divorce rate. In other words, this study tells us nothing that anybody here actually cares about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:24 PM
2

Any guy who would do that at the behest of random women isn't a guy I would want reproducing anyway. Those women are free to push for what they want. I don't care about their opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:16 AM
1

I would absolutely not go for this. 'If you want it done right, do it yourself' very much applies to motherhood. There are just so many potential problems with it...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 03:17 PM
1

You need a reality check then. Maybe if someone was physically enforcing that opinion, you'd have a point, but over here in reality, you just sound nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 10:12 PM
1

What kind of accelerationist sophistry bullshit is this? "...Having said that, you have to find a middle ground, a compromise." According to your logic, telling them to compromise is "infringing on [the] liberties" of those who don't want a partner with a lot of past sexual partners. Keep trying though...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 09:48 PM
1

I can't think of any war where enough men participated for there to be societal collapse. You'd probably need somewhere between 40% and 50% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 08:20 PM
1

Society only exists because men created it. If enough men reject society because they are unable to fulfill their most base desires, then society will collapse. Is that what it's going to take for you to learn what oppression truly means?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/22 02:10 PM
1

This is the goofy shit I like reading. The stuff that assumes humans exist outside of nature... "Women have grown independent of men" Women aren't independent of men. Men are the backbone of society. If enough men check out, society collapses. If one Russian guy drops a nuke, society collapses. Then women will go right back to reliance on men. It's an ever looming threat. "Just hormones" Imagine thinking this... We evolved to have those hormones because they were beneficial to survival. We are n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:47 AM
4

Men notice unattractive women, but they don't pursue women they find physically unattractive. The initial hurdle a woman must clear is physical attraction, but it's usually not a very high bar for most men. If he's not physically attracted to her on some level, then there's pretty much no shot. After that, it's mostly about availability. No matter how pretty a woman is, most men won't approach her if she seems standoffish. This is why you would notice extraverted women more; they're much more av…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:16 PM
0

You may be book smart, but it seems that may be the only thing going for you. Your framing of leadership makes that very clear. If you're questioning his every move, then he isn't your leader. If you want to be led, then you need to find a man you can trust to actually lead you. This has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with being a pain in the ass. A woman who wants a leader and refuses to be led is determined to be single. Looks were always the priority for men, but a hot w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 04:19 PM
1

I don't think I'd argue for men having more or less emotions than women. I would argue that men's emotions and women's emotions tend to be expressed differently. I would also argue that men tend to be more capable of regulating their emotions. As for why these differences exist, it's probably partially socialized and partially genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 03:16 AM
6

IDK about others, but when I talk about 'average x', I'm referring to a statistically average x - not myself. Often x category doesn't even apply to me. People are capable of understanding the experiences of others who are not themselves,or maybe that's just me?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:29 PM
1

"That's what I love about these high school20-24 year old girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 05:38 AM
0

I think guys often don't feel the need to analyze everything in fine detail. We just like what we like. It doesn't need to be that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 05:58 AM
1

impure men who want a chaste woman can just go die. This is a little harsh lol. I figure you're referencing the end of my post, but the end of my post was just a reference to the story of Narcissus. The man who is not pure did actively affect another's chastity That's not necessarily true. But even in the cases where it is true, it's not Person A's job to protect Person B from making decisions that you or I may consider unwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 05:53 AM
6

Many people are hypocrites, but that's entirely unrelated to this subject. There is no hypocrisy in desiring a trait in a partner that you yourself lack.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 05:34 AM
0

You didn't need to go into the whole thing about courage to say what is obvious: you don't need to possess the traits you desire in a partner. How can she want a man that's taller than her even though she's not taller than him? Why does she want a man even though she's a woman? Why does he want a chaste women even though he isn't chaste? Anyone who expects their partner to have the exact same qualities as themselves should just go stare into a pond until they die or something...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 05:28 AM
1

Looks matter... but I won't date an Instagram hoe over a smart, kind below average looking girl. Thankfully, I don't like in a world where those are my only options. I'll just date neither. Looks don't matter as much to men as they do to women, that much is true. That topic is much more complicated than that simple assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:11 PM
1

when u truly love someone the imperfections or marks kind of just vanish and u stop caring. Of course in the friends context you wouldn't really care about their physical attractiveness. dont dismiss a lifetime of enjoyment because the girl has a large mole on her left cheek. Yes. As lifelong friends. See how this works? its shallow. Whether you think it's shallow or not doesn't matter to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 01:36 AM
1

Love in the context of a relationship (barring a small segment of the population that can be deemed to be oddballs) inherently has a sexual aspect to it. I think I can speak for most men when I say that we don't want to have sex with someone we don't find physically attractive. If a guy finds a woman he really connects with but isn't physically attracted to, then she is a perfect fit for being his friend. What's so difficult to understand about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 01:06 AM
2

This post just sounds goofy. Like a not-so-elaborate troll. Looks matter. There are no two ways about that. You should be attracted to someone you're going to be in a relationship with if not for your own sake, then for theirs...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 10:42 PM
9

A dating app being "traditional" is an oxy moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 08:17 AM
1

Ya know, I've run into people who have issues with the modern dating landscape, but I haven't run into anyone starving due to lack of crop yields.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 10:32 PM
1

You are categorically wrong about climate change. What claim did I make about climate change that is provably incorrect?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 04:41 PM
1

Climate change is also a bad analogy. The problems between men and women actually effect people on an individual level. Even those who are alarmist about climate don't actually buy their own garbage. They all fly their private jets to sniff their own farts about how they'll control what YOU do. Of course, this is right after they buy beachfront property that is definitely going to be underwater -5 years from now. Wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 11:13 AM
2

I think the bigger issue is the mismatch between male and female virginity. There are vastly more male virgins than female virgins today which points towards a societal problem. It indicates that there are a lot of men who have essentially no access to women. The underlying reason for this doesn't really matter. What matters is that men really want to be with women. What also matters is that men keep society functional. If enough men cannot get access to what they desire, they'll see no reason t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:56 AM
1

Frankly, this post is put together as if we can read your mind. Peterson's idea of "enforced monogamy" Jordan Peterson? not his idea anthropological/sociological term you never properly explained it, hence the first line of my comment
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:38 AM
1

I think it's foolish. There is value to be had in interacting with women in the dating context. At the very least, use dating as a learning tool. Learn about women, general social interaction, intersex dynamics, what you like, what you dislike, and who you are, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 05:53 AM
1

I see you're taking the criticism well. What I said was accurate, and clearly by your response to me, you can't refute it. It's not my problem if you don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 06:48 PM
1

People get annoyed by unearned confidence also known as arrogance. Let me ask you this: in the context of a relationship, what worth does a 44 year old single mother have? Cuz unless you were married and the man died, you can't say you're good at picking partners. And even in such a case, it's still a 50/50 shot that you're any good at selection. You're not having more kids at 44, so you don't bring that to the table. You bring a child/children that isn't his, so that's just a headache. This jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 07:27 AM
5

The 2010 census of the US shows there were roughly 112,000,000 people between the age of 18 and 44. Roughly half of those (56,000,000) people are women. According to the your link, 3,519 women under the age of 44 were murdered in the year 2015. Also from your link, only 55.3% of those deaths (1946) were from Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). The most generous (?) number I can come up with is roughly 3.5 per 100,000 women under the age of 44 will die due to IPV each year. I say that number is 'gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 11:24 PM
1

If I had to get mathematical as to what I think I'd consider acceptable enough to date a woman, then this is what I would go with. n is number of sexual partners a is her age n ≤ ⌊(a-16)/2⌋ + 1 ≤ 7 ⌊(a-16)/2⌋ is a floor function so it's always rounded down This took 2 minutes to think up, so maybe it could be refined. IDK. IDC.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 09:56 PM
3

A close friend wanted to start working out and dragged me along. I'd been athletic my whole life, but I hadn't seriously developed muscle beyond legs. I went along with him because I had plenty of free time and he was a close friend. I didn't need any more reason than that. I've since continued it because there's just something fun about physical power and working out is also a good outlet for excess energy and stress. Sure, girls like the way it looks and enjoy the physical power too, but that …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 11:23 AM
1

Reject the premise by rejecting them both because I can get woman C who is better than both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 12:44 AM
1

There's no point in getting rid of it. Any man who has a problem with a woman being a prostitute now is also going to have a problem with her being a prostitute in the past. She can either find a guy who accepts a prostitute or delete the OF and do everything in her power to factory reset her life so no man ever finds out. Realistically, you can't hide the truth forever, so she's better off just finding a guy who is ok with a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:37 AM
5

Of course. Most people do that. From my experience, women do it much more often than men, but both genders do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:16 AM
2

Send me your credit card details please. I promise I won't abuse the power to put you in debt. If you don't trust me, it's because you have trust issues and fear commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 05:15 AM
3

Original: When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 01:03 AM
5

Imagine taking an idiom literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 12:53 AM
2

This argument is garbage. Even if we accept that there are men who want to marry a virgin and want to sleep around before doing so, that doesn't mean they want all women to save themselves until marriage. The most you can say is they want at least 1 woman to save herself for marriage. Also, even if they only want to marry a virgin, that doesn't mean they've done anything to shame women who aren't virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 12:44 AM
1

Also why would women date a soy boy instead of a masculine alpha man? Doesn't this prove the redpill wrong? They didn't say they wouldn't fuck someone who voted for the opposing candidate. I guess it would fit into the "alpha fucks, beta bucks" mantra. Also, this doesn't account for the fact that most people don't talk about politics early on when knowing someone...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 10:23 PM
1

I would agree that "the wall" isn't some exact age. I would argue that a woman has hit "the wall" when the number of men that she desires that also desire her become vanishingly small. At such a point, she is essentially forced to settle. Her options decrease in two ways. Gradually and then suddenly. She gradually loses some of her desirable options over time and feels like that's acceptable. Then she passes a point and suddenly runs out of desirable options such that it feels like slamming into…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 06:10 AM
1

"Can you improperly assess the character of another human?" Yes. Obviously yes...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 05:47 AM
1

Yeah... None of this assessment is fair. It's comparing the best of women with the worst of men - not average to average. Also, your friend doesn't seem to realize something important. If women start clustering around the top men, they have every incentive to just use and throw away the women who want them due to an abundance of options. Not only that, the "low" men that carry society on their backs won't continue doing what society needs if they can't get access to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 04:29 AM
7

"A key that opens any lock is a master key, but a lock that opens for any key is useless." They use this to try to claim a double standard for promiscuity. Silly, of course, because penises are not keys and vaginas are not locks. Why would you make this post when you didn't even understand the original analogy? It's not referring to a penis as a key or a vagina as a lock. Also, even if it were analogizing a penis to a key and vagina to a lock, it would be an ANALOGY so obviously it wouldn't be l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:38 AM
1

So your position is "guys, be willing to wait a completely arbitrary amount of time that I have determined because that's how long I waited." What makes your position better than a guy who says "3 dates" instead of "2-3 months?" Better than a guy who says "6 months - 1 year?" Why is the arbitrary amount of time you've decided what makes a "genuinely good person?"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 08:25 PM
2

If she's vetting you to find out if you want a serious relationship, she isn't going to provide an explicit time period since that would defeat the original purpose. Essentially, you're asking men to live in celibate limbo until she has somehow determined that he is serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 04:44 PM
4

If a woman wanted to wait until marriage to have sex and a man dating her broke things off because he is unwilling to wait that long, would you still say it is a red flag with that man? Is he now excluded from being a genuinely good person that wants a stable long term relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 08:41 AM
0

I've never simped, so I'm exempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 04:19 AM
1

Not really a complete tangent. My response was about how your post is telling an incomplete story. But whatever... From the post's title: anyone of any race can be attractive Not true. There are some naturally ugly motherfuckers out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 03:58 PM
1

Sure, but this doesn't tell the whole story. Let's look at some numbers for women in the US. Ethnicity Average Weight in pounds (2016) Average Height in inches (2015 - 2018) Average BMI Non-Hispanic White 170.9 63.9 29.4 Non-Hispanic Black 186.1 64 31.9 Hispanic 169 62 30.9 Mexican American 171.9 61.7 31.7 Non-Hispanic Asian 132.4 61.5 24.6 There's more underlying these numbers (specifically bell curves), but this functions well enough to show a trend. In terms of weight, asian women are (on ave…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 05:40 AM
1

Jessica is only willing to accept a man who is a doctor along with being 6 feet tall or taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 05:37 AM
4

Just a reminder that the average 25 year old American woman is 5 feet 4 inches and weighs 165 pounds. This is a BMI of 28. According to BMI standards, Jessica (by being 100% average) is nearly obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 05:28 PM
58

I think standards become unrealistic when one does not realistically compete for a partner that meets those standards. Let's take a hypothetical woman named Jessica. Jessica is the average 25 year old American woman. She is 100% completely average in every way. Jessica is only willing to accept a man who is a doctor along with being 6 feet tall or taller. She has no other standards. Realistically, all men who are doctors and 6 feet tall or taller will have opportunities to be with women who they…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 08:27 AM
4

why don't I ever hear men complain about the lack of male specific birth control options? Because it's not worth complaining about something that you're not even sure CAN be created. It's pretty easy to stop 1 egg being fertilized. How do you stop a billion sperm? And if you CAN do it, how invasive or irreversible will it be? Simply put, there's no point complaining about it. I often see the argument that men shouldn't have to pay child support for children they don't want, but I don't see much …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 08:33 AM
2

Men's toolkit revolves primarily around physicality. This includes things like violence and threats of violence. Men are expected to have self control and restraint. If they fail to do this, other men will hold them accountable by arresting them. Women's toolkit revolves primarily around social manipulation. This includes things like attacking insecurities, spreading rumors, and lying. Women don't have this same expectation of self control and restraint. This has allowed women to run rampant wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 02:14 AM
1

There's no great incentive to make such a thing right now. That being said, there is research money going into similar things already. If all women disappeared, there would be great incentive to create an artificial womb. Loads of resources would be dumped into it, and quite frankly, ethics would likely go out the window for the sake of species survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:49 AM
1

Wombs don't matter if you don't have food and clean water. In a world where men suddenly disappear, society would almost immediately collapse sending the women effectively back to pre-electricity times. At that point, it's going to be a hell of a challenge to do the high tech things necessary to reproduce without men. The only saving grace is that that modern guns would still function.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:36 AM
1

feel free to enlighten me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:32 AM
1

To quote a brilliant man: There'd definitely be a period of strife Learn to read lol. Then again, it's probably too dark to read right now without electricity in your women only society.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:29 PM
1

If women suddenly found themselves without men, they would be sent back to the stone age. If they didn't get some men back into their society, they'd die off completely because cloning surely isn't possible without electricity. If there was 6 months prep time before men disappeared, women could probably survive long term. The population would be more limited than in the male version of this equation. If women suddenly disappeared from society, men would be fine. There'd definitely be a period of…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:10 PM
1

If men disappeared, our species would die off. If women disappeared, artificial wombs would be created within a decade and the species would survive. That's just the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:46 PM
1

Most women today are allergic to accountability. The degree of this allergy varies. For some, it's lethal to be held accountable while others just break out in hives. They must destroy the very concept of ideals otherwise someone may try to hold them accountable for their failures to live up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:03 PM
2

I push for the legalization of prostitution because I think capitalism is the best market strategy. As a separate issue, I judge prostitutes and those who utilize them negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 03:43 PM
1

Widows (man or woman) are the exception. I still wouldn't date a single mother who was widowed, but I would at least be more understanding of her situation. From there, it's simply a matter of 'what percentage of single mothers are widows' versus 'what percentage of single fathers are widows.' In my experience, single fathers are much more often widowers than single mothers. Since this is the case, more single fathers (by proportion) will receive this understanding. Making stupid choices isn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:21 PM
2

I'll just go with the "masculine" traits you mentioned. Assertiveness: Beyond the base level of assertiveness that all adults should have, it's not something I value in a woman. And yes, there is a base level of expected assertiveness that is neither masculine nor feminine. Career ambition: Don't care about this at all. Hard working is important, but that's never been masculine or feminine. Throughout history, everyone worked their ass off. Speaking out: Don't care either way as long as they can…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 07:12 PM
1

But at least for them, there's a chance. And humans love to take a long shot as if it's likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 10:59 PM
–

Thanks for proving my point, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 02:02 PM
–

Why do people keep looking at outcomes and assuming the outcomes match the intended goals? That's really dumb. "Most businesses fail. It must be because people who start businesses want to go bankrupt." - you, probably
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 12:25 PM
1

The idea that 50 year old average ugly farts are marrying hot 20 year olds Who are you replying to? Because I never said that such a thing was the case. Again, seek help - your delusions are affecting your ability to function.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 07:59 AM
0

What weird fever dream have you constructed in your head? I recommend professional help.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 06:55 AM
–

I read the first line, but I'm not reading a braindead wall of text. As for the first line, that doesn't surprise me. The isolated anecdote of YOU just isn't irrelevant to overall population trends though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 06:54 AM
2

More worthless info. Quit giving me notifications plz thx
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 06:48 AM
0

So what if most women want men their own age? Most men want 20 year olds regardless of their own age. And yet things still work out somehow. Use your brain please.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 03:05 AM
–

From an evolutionary perspective, yes. Those drives are biologically ingrained to be very strong. The women over 40 have basically no hope to have kids if they haven't had them already. At that point, what's the point in getting a relationship/partner for those women? Men don't have these same biological limitations, so they're more likely to still want those things past age 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 03:00 AM
–

It's over for women over 40. There's no hope for them to create a family. Either they've had kids or they never will. Men over 40 are basically similar to most 30 year old women. It's time to start looking to make that family.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:45 PM
2

What you have to offer What you want in a partner What your ideal partner wants from you The less you know the answer to these three questions, the less likely you are to find what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 04:48 AM
2

All of those are unnecessary. They can fall under the "what you have" or "what you want in a partner" or "what your ideal partner wants."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 04:42 AM
1

You're conflating aggression and violence. While violence is aggressive, it's not the only form of aggression. Knowing how and when to be aggressive is a valuable skill as a man. Also, almost nobody (men and women alike) wants to deal with aggression on a daily basis, but I think most women appreciate if a man is capable of aggression in the right circumstances. You getting into bar fights are bad examples. You clearly resort to violence too easily. The women see that and dislike it. And frankly…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 07:02 AM
1

For women, what would you do if you were unable to find a suitable partner? I think this question works for men as well. When just looking at my age group, I see ~70% of women as not physically attractive. Even with the ~30% that pass that first step, even fewer fit in terms of personality, interests, values, and beliefs. Should I choose to look for a partner, I have confidence in my ability to find a suitable match. For men, what would you think would happen if increasing numbers of women becam…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:54 AM
2

I don't mind if women want to get 100 cats and die alone. It's no skin off my back. Women today are more free and empowered to make their own choices than any previous generation of women that this world has ever seen. And what do they have to show for it? Well, they're less happy than any generation of women ever. So there's that... All I ask is that women don't whine about the outcomes of their own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:29 AM
1

I think it will go back up a little bit in 2021 then drop for a few more years. It'll go up a fair bit after the civil war though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:19 AM
1

The 'bar-fight-guy' was just an example. I used it because it's widely agreed upon that such a judgement is justified. Violence certainly isn't the only justification for judging someone. What about women having sex is worthy of judgement? It has nothing to do with sex or women in particular. Everything people do is worthy of judgement. Men have loads of unprotected sex with a lot of questionable people and no one questions there self worth. I never questioned anyone's self worth here. I can't d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 08:06 PM
1

You're assuming it bothers me so much. It's not a significant part of my daily life. Besides, why shouldn't I judge people based on the actions they choose to take? If some dude consistently went and got into bar fights, I would look at him negatively too. It doesn't matter that I don't care about bars, fighting, or that he never tried to fight me in particular; he is still someone I would view negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 07:43 PM
2

It's a difference in standards. Let's use the example of dusting or vacuuming. On average, men will accept a dirtier environment than women. When a woman thinks something NEEDS to be cleaned, the dude is thinking that it'll fine for another month or so. Since he is fine with things in their current state, he won't do anything about it. She'll end up getting bothered by it being 'dirty' and eventually clean things herself. She looks at that as "doing all the cleaning" while he looks at her as "ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 05:29 PM
9

A major survey of 127,545 American adults found that married men are healthier than men who were never married or whose marriages ended in divorce or widowhood. I hate this statistic. It includes too much so that it tells too little. Why include men who were never married in the same category as men who have been married but got divorced/widowed? They're much more interesting as separate categories. The divorced/widowed men obviously drop the average age because a lot of them blow their brains o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 05:13 PM
5

I don't know if it's fair or not, but it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 04:45 AM
5

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 03:46 AM
19

I have a negative view of onlyfans girls, porn actresses, strippers, phone sex operators, cam girls, prostitutes, or sluts in general. Not sure which men you're referencing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 10:01 PM
1

Moral or ethical compulsions could prevent these actions. Without that, they'd need societal incentives/disincentives. Currently, the US is rife with perverse incentive structures that will inevitably lead to this country's destruction. Women 'exploiting their own sexuality for gain' is just one aspect of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 03:08 PM
2

There are plenty of jobs where the incentive structure is poorly set up. Construction workers are often paid by the hour. They can spend 10 hours doing nothing and still get paid. As long as they can avoid being found out, they're incentivized to avoid working. Therapists get paid based on the people coming to them having a problem. If the problem is fixed, the therapist no longer gets paid. Pharmaceutical companies get paid when you buy their medicine. They are incentivized to treat the symptom…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 04:04 AM
1

But even then I would disagree. If someone agrees to doing half of the housework and 100% of the financial work, that's equal to them. There may be other elements (outside of financial and chores) that make that deal worth it. Or maybe there aren't other factors, but it's still not my deal to make/take.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 04:09 PM
1

Your argument is essentially partners should perform based on their staengths which is fundamental to a traditional relationship. No, I'm not arguing what roles people should play. I'm arguing that people should come to an agreement in their relationship. Whatever that may look like is inherently an equal exchange otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to it. Are you suggesting traditional relationships are inherently an equal exchange between consenting adults? No, but they can be. I only said Per…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 04:03 PM
1

Your idea of equality (when taken to its limit) implies that both parties should do literally half of every chore. "Honey, I finished mowing my half of the lawn. It's your turn now!" It's ridiculous, isn't it? If your response to this is "No! It's an equal share of the chores!" Then good - this means you understand the concept of equal exchange. And that an equal exchange is still fundamentally equal. They don't literally have to do the same things for them to be considered equal. They may not b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 02:47 PM
0

When you are the victim of a violent crime by definition you played a passive role Not really. Self defense is still an option. Buy a gun and carry it with you. While the criminal is at fault for committing the crime, that doesn't preclude the victim from making it too easy. The lead up before the crime is often where the victim goes wrong. Aside from that, my comment (and this post) isn't exclusively about crime. That's just a single example among many possible examples. We could look at a non-…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 09:10 AM
3

A lot of women go through life believing bad things fall out of the sky. Plenty of women act as if they are just playing a passive role in their own life. They pretend they have no control over the outcomes they get. It is generally acceptable to hold men accountable for our role in the outcomes we get. This is much less often the case for women. It does women no service to be lenient and can breed resentment among men who see the double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 08:39 AM
0

I'm down to glass the middle east if you are. Give the word!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 08:17 AM
1

I literally never even implied anything. There is no subtext. Stop trying to read tea leaves on what I actually meant. weirdo...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 11:08 PM
4

The first is low body fat + lean muscular body. A man who is on a caloric deficit but consumes high levels of protein and works out alot to look shredded. Typically around 5% body fat. A man who has a caloric deficit is losing weight. If he has 5% body fat, he cannot afford to lose weight. He will actually die from too little fat. Also, 5% body fat is body builder competition level - nobody actually maintains that. Do not set that as your standard because you are guaranteed to fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 06:07 PM
0

Are you serious? You think women can only be into a single type of guy? Also, "basically 100%" is inherently not 100%. Doesn't change much, but I figured I'd point it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 05:31 PM
1

Women can be attracted to more than 1 specific type of man. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 04:46 PM
1

Of course some women are attracted to them. I fail to see how that's relevant though. It's not like women are exclusively attracted to that type.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 04:08 PM
1

The "bad boy stereotype" limits the pool of women available and the type of relationships available with different women. If the goal is just to have as much sex as possible with as many women as possible, it's a good strategy. If the goal is to have a functional healthy long term relationship, it's unlikely to work out well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:34 PM
3

Everyone has unique needs. One-size-fits-all approaches won't work. I much prefer 4 sizes fits all: Anxious, Avoidant, Anxious-Avoidant, or Secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 06:57 AM
1

I don't care what other people claim. Their claims are not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 06:10 AM
1

This is such a tired trope. You're just trying to make up that I have some nefarious motive so you can ignore my points.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 06:10 AM
1

There is no fair in dating. There is only that which you accept and that which you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 09:01 PM
1

My comment and this post in general aren't about you. It may be originally your writings, but they were purely used as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 06:40 PM
3

I'm demisexual, that's not so difficult. No 6',6'',6 nulls, you know. I do not know. At all. It's okay if they have lower salary, Too vague. You might earn a lot. If you earn $100,000 a year, an average man earning $45,000 a year isn't going to be able to keep up with your lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 06:35 PM
2

The same thing she wants him to. This is a mistake a lot of women make. They assume that men want the same thing in women as women want from a man. If a man wants a copy of himself, he would just date another dude. Honestly you guys should have similar lists. I can't speak for other guys, but I have an idea of what I want. It's not entirely dissimilar to the original list, but the similarities are mostly surface level. I know I severely limit my options with how strict I am, but I'm ok with that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 06:30 PM
10

Bruh that's literally just the traits that are bare minimum for a good person... Apparently being a good person involves liking art, liking pets, and having similar kinks. Also, I personally disagree with a number of those values, but I still think I'm a good person. Doesn't even mention attractiveness, salary or anything Actually, it does indirectly mention attractiveness and salary. "We find each other sexually attractive" This inherently means she must find him physically attractive. "Financi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 02:34 PM
2

Guys like this exist, but they're not a huge percentage of all men. And basically 100% of women want these men. Any guy that fits this automatically gets to pick almost any woman he wants. There aren't enough of these guys to go around, so some women are simply not going to get what they want. Then it becomes a question for the woman. What does she bring that will make him pick her over every other woman who wants him? Most women don't bring a lot to the table that is valued by men. If a woman w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 02:12 PM
2

Fatness is a more important selection factor for men than it is for women. A fat man can make up for that in other ways, but he still knows his chances would be better if he were slimmer. A fat woman has no means of recovery. She simply must lower her standards to match her fatness, lose the weight, or be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:37 PM
1

Nice deflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:33 PM
3

There are a lot of women who don't play an active role in their own pleasure or their partner's pleasure. The classic starfish. They refuse to take an active role. They're basically side characters in their own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:19 PM
3

Dating can be simpler, but not in the United States as it currently is. In places where the values are largely homogenous and the rules of the game are laid out clearly, dating isn't too difficult. In the west, there are so many distinctly conflicting sets of values that you have to sift through. And beyond that, the rules of engagement for dating are an ever-changing amorphous blob. It doesn't have to be that way, but it is that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:00 AM
1

I don't mind going to a bar if it's with friends. But I absolutely don't want to be bothered by women while I'm there. Difference in taste I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 09:32 AM
1

many different types of people can be found at bars. Sure, but 90% of them are the type of people who like going to bars which is pretty much disqualifying to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 08:03 AM
7

I've gotta disagree. Quality is hard to find at bars and clubs when wading through all of the garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 11:05 PM
16

The beautiful person's arrogance and the ugly person's resentment may be an expression of the same underlying thing with different (beauty vs. ugly) environmental factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 02:25 PM
113

Beautiful women have more opportunity to develop a great personality. It's up to them whether or not they choose to seize such opportunities. Ugly women have more incentive to actually develop a great personality. They're less popular, so they'll have less opportunity to actually develop a great personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 11:18 AM
1

Correct, they want them to be educated because of the benefits that tends to bring. Of course, this has nothing to do with gender. You just repeated my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 04:30 PM
1

I don't get the reference. Also, I've never met a single person whose name ended with "teen." Feel free to try again though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 04:29 PM
1

No... It was a comment about how others treat women. a lot of people think women age as follows Many people treat women as perpetual children (15 years old for the sake of example) until they're like 22 or 23 years old. I even followed the comment up by saying that such people are delusional. You were born with a brain - please use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 11:07 AM
13

Or maybe they just think she's hot and want to fuck her. Nobody whines when cougars go for young dudes who don't have a degree or job. Their brains also aren't done developing yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 06:40 AM
15

You're entitled to think it's creepy, but that doesn't mean it's abuse or that she's a victim. She's an adult fully capable of making her own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 06:25 AM
3

As an addendum to this, whether or not any woman can marry a man and become a housewife is dependent on her ability to attract and keep a man who is able to support a family. At least for the start of her adult life, she'll have to work until she finds such a man. It's wise to encourage her career because it's less reliant on the choices of others. Even if becoming a housewife is the goal, she had better have a backup plan if she is unable to achieve that. Her career is her backup plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 06:17 AM
5

I even come from a repressive Middle Eastern poor but wanting a better life background and all the girls I know say the same, their dads push them to be successful and make them put off marriage until later. Fixed that for ya! This effect tends to occur in cultures where they are poor and want a better life. Women will go into things that are profitable because they have to earn money to create that better life. Also in these cultures, the parents tend to benefit from their child's success in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 05:56 AM
9

Agreed, but if you are talking about realllllly young women, the criticism of that isn't that it's unfair. If she fits within the classification of 'woman' then she is fair game. A dude could be 10000 years old and going for 18 year olds. Fair. I know a lot of people think women age as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 22, 23, 24... but their delusions are not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 05:11 AM
1

They view strippers as well items they can posses and even when dating women in this industry they commodity them. This isn't exactly relevant, but the men you are talking about aren't the ones who commodified the stripper's sexuality. The stripper commodifies her own sexuality by being a stripper. The stripper has set the precedent that such commodification is acceptable. “Oh this is my girlfriend isn’t she so hot she’s a stripper btw” kind of thing. Why is that important? When guys tell their …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:07 PM
1

You’re purposefully misrepresenting my point. I'm really not. You're not being detailed, so I'm working with what I can. Typically I see men trashing women and flattening them down to stereotypes. Either that or objectification. This is what I am against. Say whatever but I don’t flatten men like that, I don’t get that tbh Let's look at this comment you posted. Can you provide an example of what you mean with the first half of this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 04:26 PM
–

I said it because it was relevant to my point. A lot of men can’t even bother to not smell like shit. Also, was this comment just man-trashing Tourette's or did you somehow think it was relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 12:37 PM
–

Femininity doesn't come naturally to most men? World shattering news right there...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 12:13 PM
2

Stereotypes exist for a reason. No matter who you are, you're going to closely fit at least a few stereotypes. That's just reality. As for objectification, some men are going to find some women physically attractive and will choose to verbalize that observation. If you want to call that objectification, that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:59 AM
2

I wouldn't say consider it tasteful to go after short men, but women can and do. It is what it is. How often do men trash talk women for an inherent characteristic that they have no control over? Maybe it happens, but I haven't seen it. From what I've seen women tend to be the ones making fun of men for the characteristics they can't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:55 AM
2

Do they trash women in general? Or do they trash a specific woman or a specific group of women? These are very different things. Guys will trash other guys, but that doesn't mean they're trashing men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:16 AM
1

Sure, but the bi men I was referencing were all of the confirmed bi men that I've met. I wasn't including any gay men or any men whose sexuality was unknown to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 06:02 PM
1

Which came first: the chicken or the egg? If women of the past selected for feminine men, they would be more common. Since feminine men aren't common, they must not have been largely selected for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 04:01 PM
1

Depends who's asking. The man from the south who loves his lifted truck and guns probably won't be finding much success in San Francisco.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:47 PM
11

Have your boys nights and meetings with men, no one is policing that Literally you are trying to police that. You have a problem with men 'saying horrible things.' Your definition of 'horrible' probably coincides with a lot of men's definitions of 'trash talk.'
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:32 PM
1

There are aspects that are subjective such as tattoos. Then there are aspects that are pretty much base biological instinct like waist to hip ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:15 PM
2

The idea that men who are bisexuals are feminine. Where does this come from? I don't know about you, but I've never met a bisexual man who I would consider masculine. They've all been more feminine than masculine. Of course, this doesn't preclude bisexual men from being masculine, but there certainly does seem to be a trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:00 PM
1

What determines if girl is getting pump'n'dumped or proposed for ltr? GIVEN THAT GUY IS OPEN FOR BOTH AND GOING TO LTR ONE GIRL AND FUCKZONE THE OTHER ONES The standard for LTR is higher than the standard for pump'n'dumped. A woman who fits the PND category is someone he finds sexually attractive enough to sleep with. She doesn't have the other attributes necessary to qualify for the LTR category. In regards to the FDS stuff: If she wants to significantly delay sex, she had better be a virgin be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 02:42 PM
1

Celebrities aren't even worth considering. People are attracted to their image, not them. Instead, let's look at the real life choices women actually make. Masculinity in men overwhelmingly wins out. The women who only want bad boys (actual criminal types) are crazy/insecure/violent women. Personally, I've never met a woman into feminine guys who didn't also have depression, anxiety, or some other similar problem. I don't think we're looking at the peak of society when considering either of thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 02:24 PM
2

Why would women want to receive flowers from a man who isn't into it? Why would women want to be taken to fancy dinners from a man who isn't into that? Because sometimes doing something for someone you love despite not exactly feeling like it is the expression of love. You're right that sex isn't charity, but in this hypothetical, it's still an expression of love from the woman - just in a different form.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 01:00 AM
1

Nah, being selective is entirely allowed. If your thing was 'receiving gifts' and your SO showed up with a gift of literal dog shit, you wouldn't be happy. But by your logic, if your SO genuinely meant it as a gift, then you should be happy. Punching you in the face requires physical touch, but even if I punch you in the face out of love <3, you probably wouldn't appreciate it even if you appreciate physical touch. Not all things are treated equally. If I had an SO go mow the lawn for me, it wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:46 AM
4

What a garbage way to look at this. Have you ever considered doing something selfless or are you purely selfish as you seem? I dislike flowers. I would never pay for flowers for myself. I even dislike the smell of flowers. That being said, if I chose to have a significant other and receiving flowers was significant to her, then I would gladly buy her flowers. To pull an example from the OP, look at the guy who would read with his girlfriend. He legitimately took an hour of his time for her. He a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:31 AM
3

Poorly thought out. Even if you spend $0, you're still investing your time. Just because I can go to a bar and get a girl while spending $0 doesn't mean it's not worth spending a few dollars to expedite the process. Then again, just because I can go to a bar and get a girl doesn't mean I actually even want that...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 05:50 PM
1

The OP was basically claiming that women who don't sleep around a bunch are basically mentally ill. I was only pointing out that such a thought doesn't even come close to reflecting reality. When it comes to your personal preferences, do whatever you like. I don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 11:09 PM
2

So the ones taking a drug (alcohol) that alters the mental state to help facilitate this behavior are the healthy ones? You know, a lot of women who sleep around often are known for having daddy issues. Is this also the ideal mentally healthy state for women? OR is sex a naturally highly consequential act? Even if modern science can mitigate those natural consequences, that doesn't mean our biological instincts go away. You're way off base with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 08:54 PM
2

No, I see no point in putting my time into someone who has chosen to not put the time into themselves. But then again, I don't mind women having the preferences that they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 08:45 PM
0

This is kind of just an amorphous blob of an argument. I can see the obvious flaws but have no idea where to start or how to clean up the whole mess...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 04:14 AM
1

If everyone followed this rule, our species would die off.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 05:43 AM
0

Everyone chooses a career and it (in some ways) shows who they are as a person. Whether they continue in that career or not does not change who they already were as a person. The whole point of your post seems to be that 'career choice reflects personality, values, character, work ethic, etc. therefore men care about women's careers.' The reality is that the career is not the important part. The important part was the personality, values, character, work ethic, etc. that got her to choose that c…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 01:56 AM
1

Her career only matters such that it reflects certain things about her. The career itself isn't important because the things it reflects were already there. These things only matter in the context of a serious relationship. If a dude is looking for something casual, he'll go for the one that looks the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 11:37 PM
7

Saying something is a turn off isn't being a douche. It's reality. Would I date someone with depression? Nope. Would I date someone with breast cancer? Nope. I'm not going to willingly introduce a situation into my life that is more trouble than it is worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 02:15 AM
2

This is selection bias. The muscular and athletic lean looking dudes usually don't bother getting in relationships because they prefer casual things with lots of different women - and they can get it. The guy with the dad bod takes the relationship because he can't get do any better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:40 AM
3

They're all exhibitionists, attention seekers, or just flat out damaged. As for the underlying reason for the exhibitionism, attention seeking behavior, or damage, I can't say. All I know is that it's never a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:30 AM
22

It's always someone else's fault, isn't it? We can both play that game. Men cheat when sexually neglected.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 07:58 PM
7

I feel like a lot of men are lustful and confuse that for love. When the chemistry wanes as it naturally does after a short period of time, the actual work of the relationship has to be done. Here is where a lot of relationships go south. I feel like a lot of women are romanceful and confuse that for love. When the butterflies wane as they naturally do after a short period of time, the actual work of the relationship has to be done. Here is where a lot of relationships go south.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 07:41 PM
0

I didn't know we needed a study for this
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 12:41 AM
1

If they don't want them, it's fine to just be honest with that. It's the stupid explanations that annoy me. I wish they would just be honest for once in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 11:03 PM
-2

If they want to be married but don't want children, that's stupid. If they don't want children because they think the world has too many people, that's stupid. Many of the women who never want children have not thought things through at all. Nobody likes stupidity. That's got nothing to do with the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 03:12 AM
14

I would argue that the level of vulnerability each party feels is inconsequential since it's a vulnerability you willingly choose to take upon yourself. Let's keep it real. We can both play this game. The penetrating party: Risks pain and injury Is more than capable of also getting an STD or UTI... Experiences the vulnerability of making one misconstrued move and being sent to prison for a decade Risks 18 years of paying and potentially never being allowed access to the child Risks being called …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 07:54 AM
7

Way to let perfect be the enemy of good enough... Please go look in this link that the OP posted. Look for the "Male Appraisals of Female Attractiveness" graph. You might think it's a Gaussian distribution, but it isn't because it doesn't fit the mathematical model with absolute perfect accuracy. Or do we live in reality. Where it's close enough... If you want to play this game, then no distributions exist ever. They're only mathematical figments of our imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 06:41 AM
1

If a woman has an issue, it's up to her to deal with it. If she hasn't dealt with the issue, then the man in this hypothetical relationship is going to have to put up with it. Many men would rather be single than to handle some woman's issues. That's just reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 02:05 PM
1

A) No. B) No. C) No. You can always choose to try to protect someone, but you can also choose to jump off a bridge. It may not be the wisest decision though. Especially when the one attacking has a gun while you have nothing...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 01:53 PM
1

Ok. So you looked at the men who decided to pay to get some semblance of a relationship with a woman and chose to use them as representatives of the entire population of older men? Well, I can't see how this could possibly skew your perspective...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 11:39 PM
1

Lol I used to be a sugar baby for a few years so I've been with many older men. Also, I'm turning 21 this year So you're 20 now. And you used to be a sugar baby for a few years? This timeline doesn't exactly look great.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 09:13 PM
4

I got news for you. This may shock you: If he is a MGTOW, he doesn't care what women want; he isn't trying to get with them. Of course, I would reject the notion that the pathway to MGTOW is being the 'nice guy,' but even if we assume that I accept your premise, what you said makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 10:32 PM
1

I've never looked poorly upon a woman who approached me in a good way. If you're wondering what isn't a good way, sexual harassment comes to mind. I'd guess that almost nobody looks at a woman who just approaches/asks out a man out as a slut. If she went up and said "fuck me" as the first interaction, she'll probably be seen as a slut. The reality is that women usually aren't willing to take the risk of being outright rejected. That's why they don't ask men out and not because of any sort of 'at…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 10:09 PM
1

All else being equal, the girl who makes the process less painful will win. That being said, if the guy doesn't think the girl is attractive, 'simping' won't help her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 09:44 PM
5

I'm all for equal opportunity. I'll trash both groups. But there are differences in the group beyond gender. Usually the 'nice guy' can make something of themselves. It's usually not too late or too far gone for them to make a recovery. This is much less true for the 'WAATGMers.' Often times they're asking that question at 35+ years old. They already squandered their best opportunities and won't be getting another shot at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 09:20 PM
1

Even a little bit overweight is enough to turn me off. I know most men aren't as strict about this as I am. thinn >> thicc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:33 PM
9

It's not evil. It's reality. A reality that a lot of men hate and a lot of women refuse to honestly acknowledge. On the flipside, you could look at women being fat or single mothers and how it damages their relationship prospects. That's also reality. A reality that a lot of women hate, but at least men have the honesty to acknowledge it. Personally, I have no problem with anybody wanting whatever they want. I may think they're delusional and setting themselves up for failure though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:14 PM
1

People seem to be getting things confused here. They see that single mothers can still go get dates and assume that means they can get relationships. Lots of dudes will fuck a single mom, but they will not get into a serious relationship with her. A hot guy who flips burgers at McDonald's can still get laid, but most women will not consider him for the long term. It's literally the same thing. Being a single mother inhibits relationships probably about as much as being a low income man. That's j…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:47 PM
3

(Because I am fit, smart, kind and rich, so I would go for someone "like me".) Then why are you even trying to date men? Date women; they're more 'like you.' I can't take this post seriously. Your intentions are for it to be about a potential trend with women, but the only argument is your own personal experience. Have you considered the idea that you're just an outlier?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:12 PM
2

I don't hate single moms. I've consistently used quotations around hate because that term doesn't properly describe the situation. I dislike their choices and actions, but that doesn't mean I hate the people. I'd question whether it is prejudice. You'd have to provide an example of something I said. I'm not going to do all the legwork for you! As for your last sentence, whatever. It's no skin off my back.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 05:18 AM
2

Does that work? Yeah, it does work. The entire premise functions on shaming. Women tend to be pretty perceptive/susceptible to social shaming. If they see one group of women getting flak for certain things, then they will take actions to try to avoid receiving the very same flak. Are there going to be some women who don't give a shit about the shaming? Yep, but no solution works 100% of the time. Why not instead focus on the culture or the deadbeat dads? Treating single motherhood as a bad thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:01 AM
2

The best way to find out the individual situation is to ask. Not sure how this is relevant though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 12:28 AM
6

Do you think single motherhood is a societal ill? If no, you and I fundamentally disagree and can end this here. If yes, this implies you wish for it to stop. On an individual level, there is very little we can do to get rid of this issue. The first thing we should do is not further contribute to the problem. From there, the most we can do is say that single motherhood is a bad thing. This will send the message to other women who haven't already fucked up that they should try to avoid fucking up…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 10:07 PM
2

Maybe so. Maybe more women will come to think like you do. Regardless, I'm not entirely unsympathetic to your position. I personally see almost no women worth dating seriously. It's not surprising that some women would think similarly about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 09:39 PM
4

Murder is not an option. The law would beg to differ. Don't set up a scenario that entirely ignores reality. That makes no sense. The argument that they should be killed(which is what's implied) is not an ethical argument and so not an ethical possibility. It's an ethical reality. Get over it. I never said it was ideal, but this is the world that we live in. What makes single mothers single mothers is because the father is absent. Sure. It never tells us why he's absent though. Was he forced out…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 09:14 PM
2

Not really. If a group can be classified to be damaging society, shouldn't they be treated as a pariah or 'hated' as the post says?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 08:32 PM
6

At least in the US, women have absolute unilateral control over whether or not a child is born. A child raised without both parents is a societal ill. Statistics show very clearly that children raised by single mothers (probably single parents in general) turn out worse. And since women have unilateral control over whether those children were ever born in the first place, they are more responsible for creating this societal ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 12:34 PM
1

No. If I take the statement exactly as written, it's not misandry, but it is arguably de-humanizing. If you changed the statement from "...value to men..." to "...value to men in dating/relationships..." then it would just be accurate. That which is true certainly cannot be misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 04:44 AM
1

Most women find that some decently-sized subset of men fit this equation: Benefits of being with him > Benefits of not being with him In contrast, you perceive it such that basically no men fit this equation. So to answer the question "why would women date them?" Because unlike yourself, other women perceive it to be worth it. Most other women are able to get over the difference in communication style. You are the outlier. I can't put it any simpler than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 04:19 AM
3

Don't get too caught up on my usage of terms like perceived risk. How people behave is always based on their own perception. I'll come back to this concept later in this comment. Your question is asking why women would date men despite men tending to have a different communication style. It's actually quite simple. It all comes down to a cost/benefit analysis. Women look at a man and determine if the cost (downsides) of being with him are greater or less than the benefits (upsides) of being with…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:10 AM
2

You are incredibly risk averse. Any perceived risk is simply too much for you to handle. Women do tend to be more risk averse than men. This seems to be especially true about you. Taking this too far can be very unhealthy. By any chance, are you agoraphobic? Or maybe only severe anxiety?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 12:27 AM
1

There's a lot of layers here, and it's not as simple as you're making it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 09:50 PM
3

Positively or negatively, nobody and nothing goes unjudged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter