TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Abstinentia Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Abstinentia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Pigman can't know that, because pigman hasn't cleared that initial hurdle, that Pigwoman was spared by default. I don't doubt pigwoman's in for a bad time too. But that doesn't change the reality of that advantage/privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 03:02 PM
27

And yet Pigman would've loved to have been so privileged. Certainly wasn't nothing to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 02:52 PM
2

Sifting through extant candidates is probably easier than shifting through a pool of candidates that doesn't exist lol. You're absolutely right about women having to vet candidates, and a huge mass of them at that, but men have to both find them, and vet them(gold diggers, cheaters, etc). And while the average man's pool is infinitely smaller than the average woman's, that's not really an advantage. Less people to vet, sure, but as a direct consequence of that, far less chance of finding someone…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:13 PM
1

Okay so... fucking around is morally right because it took greater work? Do you view sex as a moral good or evil? Pretty odd view tbh. It's the context we're looking at here. Never said they were. The indulgence aspect of it is though. Either someone chooses to indulge in frequent casual sex or they do not. If you leave all context out of the situation, sure. But that's just reductio ad absurdum.Context creates meaning. If you ignore it, ofc you can shoehorn in whichever interpretation supports …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 05:15 PM
1

Assuming all else were equal, what you say would be true. The devil here lies in the fact that they are not. It's similar to the inherited wealth thing I brought up earlier. I.e., it's not the wealth itself that is deemed moral or immoral, but the work done in getting there. (Ofc, there's likely a heavy element of protestant work ethic and morality in this, but that's a separate discussion). That's why these situations aren't viewed as equal. It's because barring the action itself, the situation…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 03:01 PM
1

I totally do lol. But that might just be me. But in either case, I don't see why systematic criticisms would be invalidated by personal choices. Those aren't r ally the same thing. You could profit off a system and still criticise it just fine. The same way one can criticise the stock market at the same time as use it to profit (or intend to) Trying to invalidated an argument based on 'ifs' and 'woulds' seems really iffy to me though. Besides it being logically unsound, there's also a whole lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 02:42 PM
1

I'd call it Working for something, instead of "suffering", but yes. Same reason why say, someone who inherited great wealth, and someone who worked for it and earnt it, are looked upon differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 02:26 PM
2

While we're playing the misleading stats game, women are also more likely to abuse children. Ofc, stats are more complicated than just numbers, but let's not let reality get in the way of scoring cheap points on the opposing gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:02 PM
1

Yes, it's run by who the people vote in. If men are running it, it's only because women (and men) voted them in. Nor are Women are not forbidden from holding office. If they get the votes, they'll be elected like anyone else. Not really sure what else you want here. This is equality. Maybe you're looking for equity. They're not the same. If you are assuming incompetence on the part of women as a sex from the getgo, as you appear to be, then that is sexism. Discrimination based on sex. I'm not re…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 09:51 AM
1

Voter suppression measures? You know those follow class lines. Especially in western 1st world countries. It's now applied pretty uniformly across sex. Race, for example, correlates far more now to those close lines, than gender has in a long time in the west. As for what's sexist, why, it's assuming incompetence and inability on the part of women, that they are unable to bear their duties as citizens of a democracy. In other words, if you're trying to pawn them off, you're pawning them off for …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:56 PM
1

I'm definitely not for it, no. Giving men the same right may not be the equality you like, but it is equality nonetheless. I hope your ideology hasn't blinded you to reality to such an extent that you cannot see that. You Americans are a funny bunch. Always so angry and eager to point fingers. Looking inward is anathema to you. Aside from the flagrant whataboutism you're doing, those points have all been addressed in the sub. You might learn something from them. One learns more from listening th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:45 PM
1

They do, ofc. And I wouldn't find so much issue with a 50-50 split on average. That's why I said "Equally culpable" :)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 01:18 PM
1

Yeah fair enough then. Consistency is good. And yeah, y'got me, I'm not American. I have seen more pro life men than women though, so figured It'd be a reasonable shot. You did ofc, dodge the question, of abortion, and in a very American way at that. You are for banning abortions then? Negative equality is equality too I suppose, haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 01:10 PM
2

Women voting the way they do is women's achievement :). Politicians are just the instrument of the people's will in a democracy. Sounds like you have an autocracy in mind though. You shouldn't use male politicians as an excuse to infantilise women voters though. That sort of misogynist attitude is very outdated.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:50 PM
3

Ah, pro life logic, eh? What a surprise You must also be anti-abortion and anti-choice, right? Because you're trying to deny the same rights to men. Well, that's assuming you believe in equality, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:45 PM
2

Asleep the past century? Women's suffrage did succeed, you know. They're now equally culpable in democratic decisions :)) Trying to pawn off responsibilities is very sexist!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:37 PM
7

It's just that "I'm not your therapist" point you see women make so often in this sub, but with genders inverted. Don't you believe in gender equality? Or are you for infantilising women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:22 PM
3

I hate to break the bad news to you buddy, but you wouldn't believe the kind of pies America has been sticking it's finger into the last 70 years too. And still is, for that matter. As a country, they really do deserve all that judgement, and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 04:23 PM
–

Well you're clearly not overemotional. Definitely very stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 07:59 PM
2

This has got to be the most privileged, head-in-the-clouds take I've ever read Sex work in first world countries is worse than effective slave labour in extremely dangerous conditions in the third world? If I didn't know better, I'd accuse you of parodying a western liberal view. You'd benefit heavily from expanding your horizons. It would help change those prejudiced views of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 03:59 PM
2

Oh nice. glad to hear you're not making excuses for them. I have met those kinds of sexists here though, who infantilise women out of all responsibility. Props to you being more sane than them, it's always a nice sight Do you suppose that women's underrepresentation on the list of genocidal leaders, is simply an artifact of the fact that they rise to power less frequently, and not a true reduction, adjusted for the population? Historically , there have been less female leaders, so this could ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 04:56 PM
2

Jesus Christ That's an Op-Ed. That's no study. It doesn't have any real predictive power. And it's really not enough to base any good faith argument in. (Not to mention it's argument being shaky, and based upon a whole lot of "what-ifs", compounded by some serious confounds) Moreover, did you even read what you linked? I'll quote it for you, so you can't miss it "The key choices about war and peace in our future will depend not on gender, but on how leaders combine hard- and soft-power skills to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 10:04 PM
3

Come now. You know the sample sizes are insufficient on the women's side to draw that conclusion. I mean, you should have learnt at least this much statistics back in high school. I do have a question for you though. How do you feel about the women complicit with these genocides? They had wives/partners, you know. As many as there were men in these structures, there were likely spouses. I'm sure you wouldn't be sexist enough to infantilise these women, and deny them culpability/responsibility fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:10 PM
2

Clearly female leadership results in fewer deaths Only if you lack an understanding of statistics. Or are pushing a bad faith argument :) To spell this out, what is your sample size of female leaders? What percentage within said sample attempted genocide? Is this sample representative? Is it large enough to draw conclusions from? I think, if you're not "denying reality", as you so eloquently put it, you will find that these show some rather large failures of logic in your argument. Im sure you'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:05 PM
4

Jeanine Anez. Organized political massacres of natives , couped a democratically elected native leader, and threatened to impose Christianity upon the natives. She's currently under investigation for human rights abuses Indira Gandhi. Started a coerced sterilisation program of the poor. Margaret Thatcher. Started a war to be re-elected. Gutted social programs, and destroyed many local industries. Come on, you can do better than obvious bad faith points. I mean, you would've known this was one, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 07:59 AM
3

They are, but why is it important for people not to be shut out from dating? Your unhappiness is not society's responsibility. That's some short sighted and self interested logic there.surely you must be aware societies are comprised of their constituents? These people are was much a part of the social fabric as you are. Deliberately excluding segments, is just going to give you a patchy sheet, and a failed society. In less abstract terms, you're creating cracks for people to fall through, and f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 11:41 AM
1

Are these points really things that are explicity taught? I mean, I can't say I've seen explicit messages not to murder either. I suppose the closest thing to that now is the punishment said criminals see. Hence that whole bit about pardoning crimes being equivalent to commissioning them. Fair point though, it would be good to have more moralistic education forced upon people. Personally, I'd heavily approve of that, just at a very large scale, from early years. But that'd be a massive endeavour…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 03:56 PM
5

Rapists are indeed well known for their receptivity to being told not to rape. This is indeed a very well thought out plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 01:17 PM
1

You put it well here. You're right, there's no sense in expecting people to grow up, or act reasonably. It's a free for all out there, and it is best to just learn to play the game, like every other two bit thug out there. It is a bit saddening though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 05:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter