TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AbyssalPlainsman Archive

View 1 post and 116 comments by AbyssalPlainsman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

AbyssalPlainsman/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 04:09 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

I get that. But the topic has little or nothing to do with your statements. I doubt anyone here puts stock in the claims of transsexuals as to their "real" gender, but that does nothing to invalidate their value as case-studies of hormone effects. The insane have given the medical community valuable data on the effects of all manner of drugs and treatments, which hormones are. Not trying to dissuade you from your belief; merely suggesting that our time and focus could be better spent talking abo…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 03:24 PM
36

This isn't relationship advice. It's a piece about male and female hormones. Female bodybuilder are another example.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 12:58 PM
8

That's not the point of anything OP wrote. It's clear that he's highlighting the dramatic effect of hormones, male and female, on the body and mind. Quibbling over something as stupid as "pronouns" serves nothing but to distract from a very good example of fundamental differences in the hormonal profiles of men and women and how impactful they are.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 12:56 PM
1

I guess my confusion stems from always associating the term with the former. "Chad" just sounds unappealing to me.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/16 02:18 PM
0

Did I miss something? Haven't there been multiple articles posted in the past that differentiate "Chad" from an intentional alpha and make it clear that "Chad" is nothing more than a lucky/ignorant combination of alpha traits that women want to fuck? It was my impression that "Chad" was an example of the poor choices that women make in men, rather than a goal to strive for. I could be wrong about the use of the term, and please correct me if I am. My memory just keeps screaming at me that someth…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/16 08:11 PM
1

Spotless and unique are both great suggestions, that everyone should follow. A lot has been said about having a "style" or look of your own when it comes to clothing, but I would argue that if you're going to be inviting women over, this would trump that. Your apartment/house, furniture, etc. need to be a reflection of you; by extension YOU need to be an interesting person with good taste. For example: Bookshelves. With actual books, that you have read and know something about, on them (caveat: …
/r/TheRedPill28/04/16 07:42 PM
1

In my opinion, that's merely a shit test. Regardless of age, they want a man, not a boy. Tell them something along the lines of "I don't date by text. Texting and phone calls facilitate communication, they don't replace it." (Obviously, tailor this to your own style of speaking.) If you're telling someone that you want to meet in a public place rather then "get to know them" via an internet connection, they have no reason to object, as that should be the end-goal anyhow. Tell them that you use w…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 03:18 PM
1

"Nope, never happened. They don't respond to intelligent things. If they reply, it's in a dumb way. Without interpunction. You can't imagine how many times conversations went to shit because they wrote 3 sentences in one and expected me to understand what they mean. And the grammer. Unbelievable how little effort they make, and they know it's unattractive! Having that said, most girls I've met or chatted with waited for me to start conversations. It's frustrating but I've come to terms with the …
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 02:04 PM
1

"You can dissect it all you want" - OK, I will "I was like that too, it puts the mind at ease" - If picking something apart results in just "putting your mind at ease" you're not doing it correctly, or for the right reasons. Picking something apart, i.e. examining all of its parts and taking an honest look at it, does NOT put your mind at ease in most cases, because the truth is very often ugly and uncomfortable. 'Ignorance is bliss' is an expression for good reason. "We cannot even phanton ther…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 01:36 PM
3

So you are serious... This isn't geared toward white people... It's geared towards MEN. I may have more kids someday, but when I choose to do so, not when some woman uses a pregnancy to trap me. Again, did you read the actual post?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 10:38 PM
3

You're either a troll or an idiot.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 09:50 PM
2

Explain how an LTR is "moral": By what standard? Biblical? Quranic? Talmudic? An LTR boils down to "I'll take care of you in exchange for sex", unless of course you believe in "true love" and the "One". If you do, that's fine, I just can't fathom why.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 05:55 PM
3

What the fuck... HOW am I promoting white genocide by warning men not to stick their dick in anyone they DON'T want to get pregnant? Seriously, read what I said. I'm as white as they come, of German-Irish stock, and my daughter is blond and blue eyed just like her dad; that doesn't mean that I want to live in a world completely divided along racial lines. If you want a white country, or white power, whatever, I honestly don't care. Every person has the right to self-determination and the freedom…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 05:52 PM
1

I don't believe in a God, and if there is one out there I highly doubt he cares at all what humans are thinking. Also, I have no interest in an LTR at this time, of any kind. LTR's are part of what got me in this mess to begin with; if you're against spinning plates and advocate LTR's only, why are you on this sub to begin with? Not meaning to be rude, but that a bit like logging into a bodybuilding subreddit and telling them that they'll be happier if they exercise less and quite dieting.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 03:41 PM
2

Fuck off you racist asshole.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 10:27 AM
1

Thanks for the link. I can't get the sidebar to work in my browser, but this one did. Printed and on my desk now to read.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 05:22 PM
1

Very true, though I hadn't though much about that (not the first thing on my mind at the moment). Child support doesn't worry me all that much, as I am perfectly happy with a minimalist lifestyle and already pay to house, clothe, feed, etc. her and her mother. It will be a small price to pay for freedom.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:55 PM
1

The first ten Amendments are referred to as the "Bill of Rights" and enumerate innate human rights, not simply things we have "permission" to do. "You don't seem to care much about the innocent victims of gun violence" - false. Anyone with a heart cares about innocent victims, of any sort of violence, but let's look at some stats, shall we? First, let's focus exclusively on your beloved AU Australian Gun Control http://www.aic.gov.a...r01.pdf#page=35 http://www.aic.gov.a...appendix_a.html http:/…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 12:51 PM
2

I appreciate it, and I take it as intended. I actually have been going to therapy, for a couple of months. The therapist has opened my mind about how "programmed" I had been from a very early age to be constantly guilty and to hold myself to a martyr-like standard of blame, etc. I grew up being told/convinced that God listened to and judged all of our thoughts, and that guilty feelings were always a symptom of actual guilt for sins against him, so TRP has really helped shed a lot of that BS, but…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 11:45 AM
1

No, they reinforce how wrong you presumption is. I don't have time now, but tomorrow I intend to give you a more complete answer as to why there is not and cannot be a "middle ground" on this any more than there can be a middle ground on freedom of expression or the right to privacy.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 10:53 PM
2

Thanks. I recognize that default blue-pill settings, programming, and good intentions all factor in, but in the end it was my fault for making the decisions I did. Now I am trying to use TRP to correct them and mitigate the damage.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 08:17 PM
3

Projection of romanticism is one of the most toxic aspects of it. It's insidious.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 08:15 PM
1

Thank you. You're right, it's very hard to comes to grips with having been willfully blind. I'm still struggling with it.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 06:15 PM
15

And what happened to overall homicide and violent crime rates? They spiked, then followed the same decades-long downward trend they had been on before the firearms bans/confiscations. So, jack shit happened, other than changing the tools used for the same crimes. And no, you don't have the same freedoms, of free speech or self defense.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 11:26 AM
1

I should clarify; she still (claims) to be madly in love with me. Initiates sex as often as I do. Is constantly jealous and suspicious. She knows exactly how I feel about her (though she seems to "forget" when we're not fighting) and that I don't want to be with her.
/r/askTRP19/04/16 11:53 PM
2

For anyone that chooses to "gloss over woman's involvement" in fuck-ups and solely blame men instead, I would simply cite as an example the relationship problems lesbians have. These are, certainly, the fault of no man, correct? It is shared, to one degree or another, between the two women within the context of their relationship. Bearing this in mind, is it reasonable to assume that simply swapping the sex of one of the partners would immediately shift all blame to the male? Anyone with a shred…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 08:02 PM
2

That scale works for "most to least violent" as well. Female + Female = Abuse, more so than anyone would have you believe.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 07:50 PM
1

As Teddy Roosevelt: Do what you can, with what you have, where you are. Though I'm not entirely sure he was talking about his dick...
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 12:08 AM
1

Don't let it discourage you. Your posts are excellent. Remember "The Man in the Arena" by Theodore Roosevelt. Or, if you haven't read it, do it now.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 11:07 PM
2

There's nothing passive about this; you're doubling the methods by which you take in the information. In what world is listening to and reading a book at the same time "passive". Try this, if you don't have an audio book to sync up: read a page of a book and write down everything you can remember, about the content, message etc. Then, pick a different page and read it aloud to yourself. Do the same. I can almost guarantee you that you find a 40-50% higher rate of comprehension and retention with…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 10:52 PM
-1

What the fuck is it with people questioning all this advice of yours without trying it? I too can speak from experience regarding improving retention via multiple sources of stimuli. It works. For me. End of discussion. Why the fuck would you, I or anyone else this works for care about these bullshit criticisms? If it doesn't work for you, fine, but telling others it won't work for them does nothing but discourage them from even attempting that which may greatly assist their personal development…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 10:43 PM
23

This should be a fallacy. The "Behind Every Great Man" fallacy. Every time I hear a great man say "I couldn't have done it without her", I think, yes, you could have, most likely sooner than you did.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 10:12 PM
3

Practice trolling? No. Your habits shape you. Trolling is for those with nothing better to do. Eliminate "um" and "uh" from your vocabulary; if you need to pause and think of something, leave the space empty. Don't conclude sentences with "ya know?", ever. This comes across as validation seeking and obscures your statements. Understand yourself, the reasons behind your actions, and your opinions/beliefs well. Any idea can be expressed in its basic form with a few simple words or phrases, as you …
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 08:18 PM
4

Assuming that every example of TRP principles being effectively demonstrated is humble-bragging sounds more akin to blue pill shaming than anything else. If it's not blatantly ridiculous, I don't see the need for skepticism whenever women act as TRP tells us they will.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 04:43 PM
25

Eh, I can buy that. I ignored women as a manager (professional reasons) in a large company and was told the same, more than once, by more than one woman. I was in charge, in shape (at the time), and IDGAF. wasn't trying to be alpha, was unaware and plugged in; I knew it was hyperbolic, but it surprised me anyhow.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 12:53 AM
3

In the book, but not in the series. He was way rougher in the series, towards her.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:31 PM
1

Wow, you're right; I honestly thought there were only 5 (though I recall now that there were 7); must have been that after season 4 I just sort of tuned out, once I lost hope that the remainder would live up to it. Once they changed the show's direction, it wasn't the same show, and he was rarely anything like the same character.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 05:27 PM
1

Oh wow, i had no idea that happened, nor was it intentional. I did it from my cell and it must have been a glitch of some kind. Thanks for alerting me to it.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 01:30 PM
1

Just their acting styles/delivery. Piven, Damon, the rest, I just don't care for them. Which is a shame, because from what you've said it sounds like a solid premise. Warburton, Offerman, those guys are more relatable in their acting, to me.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 01:04 PM
3

I would, but my issue with the show is the actors. Every single one of them gets on my nerves. "Rules of Engagement" is a sitcom from a few years back, starring Patrick Warbuton, that is chock full of RP truths (and plenty of cringe worthy moments too). It's pretty damn funny, and exposes a lot of the absolutely shitty parts of relationships, if you ignore the trite, fem-centric resolutions. Quote from the show (married woman and single bachelor talking) Audrey: You makes jokes about relationshi…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 12:41 PM
2

No. Thank god. Well, I've only watch clips of Entourage, but Californication is much more the story of a solo, independent, struggling writer in his 40's that genuinely does not give a fuck and manages to bed at least one woman half his age in every episode. Good show and I'd recommend it; it's about as RP as you'll get from modern entertainment, the final season (and his latent oneitis for his ex) excluded. I'd honestly just watch the other seasons, as from a story-telling standpoint the final …
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 12:19 PM
-1

Women can orgasm while giving a blowjob, but it's not due to any stimulation caused by the dick in her mouth. One woman that I was with would sit on her heels and grind slightly (it positions their pussy directly over a hard, smooth surface) while she sucked, and since the act of sucking me off was a huge turn on for her, those two things (the mental and physical stimulation) were enough for her to get off during. If a woman is prone to squirting (regardless of whether it is pee or not) when she…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 12:01 PM
2

I see the OP's point, but yours makes sense too. If you feel comfortable walking away at any time, then short-term monogamy is not a bad thing, as you say. I think there's a need for balance, but it may have simply been more than he was willing to concede at the time.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:49 AM
1

Hmm, looks like the mobile version is jacked, but the desktop is fine. Ignore me then.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:46 AM
2

Agreed. The final season was a travesty, in my opinion, but the first 4 were RP gold in many ways.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 11:14 AM
2

I think your format got fucked up in the last paragraph and cut off your summary/her response. I'd encourage an edit. Interesting FR. Authentic.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 10:56 AM
3

Hank Moody possessed many alpha traits, but his oneitis ruined that for me. Loved the show, but his obsession with Karen sickened me.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 09:39 AM
1

Exactly. Read some of Mark Rippetoe's articles on the subject (on t-nation or starting strength); really solid information there. He includes it as one of THE crucial lifts, along with the squat, deadlift, bench press and power clean (combining the latter with the press is on of the most effective ways to train for overall power and real-world ability).
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 09:28 AM
2

Oh, I know. As usual, I hoped logic, evidence and reason might penetrate the fog of idiocy, but it never does.
/r/becomeaman15/04/16 09:21 AM
3

If you look at the context, we were specifically talking about picking women up and tossing them around, playfully. The OHP and Clean and Press, specifically, are the best exercises for this, as they build the kind of power you need. Functional strength = ability to implement dominant tactics, not necessarily dominance in and of itself.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 09:17 AM
2

Agreed. Saying it's always sexual sounds like you're retweeting Anita Sarkeesian or some shit.
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/16 11:14 PM
2

One of my favorite YouTube channels, by far; good mention. I've never bothered to look at the comments, but that doesn't surprise me at all.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 11:06 PM
17

That makes good sense, plus the clitoral "roots" wrap all through that area (that's what makes anal sex/analingus pleasurable for women as well; quite a few of those nerves endings are concentrated around the anus and some women can reach orgasm purely via anal penetration/stimulation).
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 06:47 PM
0

Last response, one which will undoubtedly go unheeded: I cited the very common "rape fantasy", the prevalence of male dominance in female-oriented erotic literature (specifically the biggest, most poorly written literary phenomenon in history, 50 Shades...), evolutionary psychology, my own personal experiences (I could have included those of my friends, as well, but didn't think to), those of this community, etc. I would supply you with a more charitable definition of immaturity, if you'd provid…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:40 PM
1

I "melt"? I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. As for replying to you: letting go of an argument with someone that is impervious to reason or nuance is a weak point of mine. I don't imagine that you are "beneath me" by nature, but your style of argumentation and intellectual rigor is certainly beneath me. Adieu.
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:34 PM
10

Quick turnaround man, feels like I just read this in the comments of that other article a second ago.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 06:25 PM
0

"Immature" = "I don't agree with him" apparently. Did you also miss the point where I made it very clear that I'm not basing it on seven women, but rather seeing that my own experiences corroborate those that others have had as well as the evo-psych reasoning for why this would be the case? If you can't be bothered to read people's comments, why bother replying?
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:24 PM
1

Did you not read the myriad of disclaimers? For example: Lesbians Those women that have been abused and cannot separate that physical abuse from their sexual life Asexual women Aside from these, I also stated that it is to be taken in the form of a mindset, not a universal truth, as did the OP. I really have no idea what your contention is here, or what would satisfy you, other than "no more nasty words that I don't think are polite". Honestly, you sound like a cry-bully that can't take not gett…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:21 PM
-1

Ha, the fact that you think anything you've said has "undermined" anything I believe is genuinely laughable. I don't give a shit what you believe; I simply don't let logical fallacy and faulty argumentation go unchallenged, on any subject. Again, you seem to completely miss the point, and continue to doggedly cling to "whore" as a negative moral judgement, when in this context, it clearly is not. Mockery, ridicule, etc. are only effective tools when you can back them up with information and inte…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:14 PM
1

Ha, I'm talking about the nature of the "argument from incredulity" - it means that you refuse to believe something because you, personally, cannot imagine it to be so, either from a lack of imagination or a prohibitive sense of the topic at hand that blinds you to any possibility other than that of which you've previously been convinced. I don't really care, nor does anyone else here, I'd wager, what you do or do not consider "dirty", or what amuses you. Frankly, if it doesn't involve feces, I …
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:09 PM
0

Then, please, by all means, site one. If the world is filled with them, cite an example of a heterosexual woman that does not enjoy being with a man that asserts dominance in the bedroom (within reason), that has actually tried it, or is not abused and traumatized to the extent where she is incapable of enjoying the any sort of dominance. Provide an example of a mentally and emotionally healthy woman that enjoys nothing but vanilla sex, and has tried it all. Seriously. If you can't, then fuck of…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 06:01 PM
2

And yet... I'm not angry, nor have I ever claimed to be. Again, not an argument. What you mistake for some kind of logic is known as an "argument from incredulity". You're not making a point of any kind, just recoiling in horror and claiming that you, personally, cannot imagine that such and such is the case.
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 05:56 PM
2

Odd, that you rail against this sub as being an example of people lacking individuality or imagination, yet remain oblivious to the OP making it clear that this is a mindset, not a moral or character judgement of women. It is meant to put you into a state of mind wherein you do not assume the chastity/frigidity of women and instead see them as beings every bit as sexual as yourself. Is it absolutely universal, such that it could be written as law? Self-evidently not; some women are hardcore lesb…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 05:53 PM
4

No, dude, listen to yourself, and to me, instead of just nitpicking what you think are faulty arguments: I'm basing my statement on the women I have been with and the anecdotal evidence of others, not just those 7... cannot believe I need to spell that out, after explaining it already. Along with the huge percentage of women that have rape fantasies, those that enjoy bondage, the ENORMOUS popularity of the 50 Shades of Gray series (seriously, look it up, those are the most popular books ever pub…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 05:47 PM
2

Yeah, I've never fully understood that taboo bit either, purely on the basis of basic anatomy. How much space is there between a woman's pussy and her asshole? Does anyone really believe that they don't cross-contaminate all fucking day? I know that I have no problem licking either (in fact, I love both), so long as she is clean. That quarter inch of perineum is hardly a "barrier" of any kind between the two (obviously this does not apply to penetration).
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 05:36 PM
3

Bench pressing doesn't really translate into real-world strength in the same way that a clean and press does though. Mark Rippetoe has a great article on the superiority of the shoulder press as compared to the bench, on T-Nation (though I can't link it here, it's not hard to find by any means).
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 05:23 PM
1

"is simply bragging in front of women to convince them that, once again, their past shouldn't matter, they aren't responsible for their decisions, and they should be loved no matter what they do." And I think you entirely missed MY point, as well. Here's what I said, verbatim, in my original post: "This would depend on the nature of the images... what kind of images are we talking about? Tasteful is a subjective term after all; are they figure studies, erotic portraiture, statement pieces, pin u…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/16 03:59 PM
3

I think my advice (it's situational and highly subjective, not for all men but some might not have a problem with it) is pretty clear and straightforward. The example of the guys dressing up like a woman is a strawman. This and the appreciation of nude art absent sexual feelings (which is something that millions have experienced - do you look at the Venus de Milo and think "nice tits", or "wow, what an amazing work of art"?) are nothing alike; it is nothing at all like a weird, outlying fetish s…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/16 03:44 PM
5

That's not an argument. I've been with only 7 women in my life, at the age of 30; I make no claim to be some kind of ultra-Alpha Pussy Slayer. I merely stated that in my experience, with 7 completely different women that couldn't have had much more different personalities or backgrounds, their enjoyment of this kind of sex was the one unifying factor. I have seen zero evidence to suggest that any woman wouldn't enjoy rough, dominant sex in my own experience, and it leads me to infer that if I me…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 03:33 PM
1

Excellent advice.
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 03:10 PM
5

I think the issue lies with your hatred of the word "whore". It means, literally "a prostitute", though we often use it as a synonym for "slut". He's not talking about morals at any point in the article, just about the kind of sex they want. "All Redditors are fat, bald, men that live in their parents basement and wank over their mum"? This describes physical characteristics and chosen, not innate behavior. And no, I wouldn't really give a shit, because I don't care about a random person's assum…
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 03:01 PM
23

I think this applies to almost all women. They, by and large, have little to no appreciation for money because they've never NEEDED to make money. Most of them are dependent on a man, from their father (either directly or via child support), to their beta boyfriends and husbands (either directly or via alimony & child support), to the government (via ridiculous tax benefits and government programs that make their spawn-of-indeterminate-paternity an asset rather than the liability that economic r…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 02:57 PM
7

Which part do you disagree with? As I understand it, his point is that women all want to have sex, including the kind that we've been told (mostly by women, historically) that only "filthy whores" want, not they that they're "filth" as human beings. And I can attest to this as well - it may be anecdotal, but every woman I've been with loved rough sex, including spanking and light choking.
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 02:41 PM
1

That's not an argument I would ever make though; primary and secondary sexual characteristics exist for a good reason, and a big part of that is for "show", obviously. A lot of it is context as well - when I see a woman nursing a child, I don't have a sexual thought in my head, but if you put those same tits beneath a white cotton t-shirt and I can see the nipples outlined clearly, I want to rip it off of her and fuck her brains out. Context. "If there was nothing special about being naked, ther…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/16 02:19 PM
2

In what sense?
/r/becomeaman14/04/16 01:55 PM
1

It really isn't the same though: gender is a biological reality, "nudity" IS a social construct, as we are not born with clothing, nor did humans use or conceptualize clothing until the very recent past. I disagree with the comment that it's "only for the plugged in mind" as well, because it most certainly CAN be sexual and as I argued, it depends on the man and woman involved, the context, the content, etc. Bear in mind that at one point the sight of a woman's ankle was consider erotic; now we'…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/16 01:51 PM
9

Are you paying any attention to the content of what is being said, or are you just hung up on the "naughty words" being used? Saying that all women are sexual beings and want to have the kind of sex that we've all been told is just for "whores" is not the same as calling all women "filth", or being undeserving of respect. In my mind, there's nothing wrong, at all, with a woman wanting those things: I WANT her to want those things, as does any heterosexual man. Who wants to be with a woman that w…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 01:18 PM
16

People don't seem to grasp this, fully. I know that I still struggle with it at times as well, seeing as it goes entirely against my own grain, but submission is in their nature. It's like a sled dog - if they aren't working, pulling and running, they're miserable and get depressed and aggressive - they've been bred to need work. Women have been bred (by evolutionary forces) to need dominance. You could use the same analogy for men, with a sheep dog - if you try to curtail or beat the instinct t…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 01:13 PM
38

"The face a girl gives the first time you pick her up and hurl her onto the bed is priceless." - 100% true. One of the reasons the overhead press is such a great, underutilized lift - if you're cleaning and pressing your body-weight, or close to it, imagine what you can do with a 100-120 lb. young thing? Better yet, get THEM to imagine it. Playful rough-housing with, or the implication that you could pick up and toss around a woman with ease is pretty much a guaranteed way to give her tingles an…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 01:06 PM
2

Oh, I understand what you are saying here, and I know that context is important, but my point is that even back then, it wasn't innate that women were an asset to men, it was enforced. Human nature, for females, is not a "gift" to men unless it is harnessed correctly, much as male nature is not an asset to females unless they are free to express it - as Rollo has said, male and female sexual strategies are at odds, fundamentally. One must capitulate or be broken for the other to succeed, unimped…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:56 PM
8

He's saying that they're all "filthy whores" in the sense that they all want cock, and they all want a dominant man in the bedroom that will show them what they want; hence the idea that a feminist (or, in many cases, a lesbian) is someone who's never been well and truly fucked, in the right way. Not that all women are literally "filthy" as in "unclean". Nuance.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:52 PM
17

There's the key: you have to be Alpha enough. If you aren't, if you just break out something like that after being her beta bitch for years, it's most likely not going to go well. I would imagine that a great deal of this is a matter of establishing and then maintaining frame as well; if you're not maintaining your control over yourself, being dominant at life in general, then dominance in the bedroom will be forced and flaccid. Side note: Choking of some sort is also a huge turn-on, for literal…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:42 PM
2

I think that for many of us (such as myself) that were raised with a religious conviction that women were created as a "prefect compliment" to men, it seems blasphemous at first to imply that women are, in fact, genetically programmed to manipulate men and use them for their own gain, even on a subconscious level. Sure, the Bible has plenty of "Red Pill" phrases and what not, but it still paints the picture of women as quite literally God's gift to man. Understanding that this is bullshit, wheth…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:16 PM
3

Often, they have the clearest access among men to women's true nature; after all, they're just "one of the girls" and women aren't so preoccupied with the facade of feminine virtue in their presence.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 10:07 AM
1

Excellent. Signed up, downloaded and have it ready to listen to on my phone. Thanks for giving us all a heads up.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 10:02 AM
3

Do you still get paid if we sign up for an Audible free trial? May sound like a foolish question, but I don't want you to get gypped either.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 01:18 AM
2

That definitely gives me a starting point to work from. I've done a lot of list writing and whatnot, but the spreadsheet makes sense (I spend most of my day fiddling with Excel anyhow, so it wouldn't take long to do that); tracking anything makes it easier to stick to, I know. Thank you, I appreciate the time and effort.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 08:32 PM
2

Start the World with Jack Donovan (not sure if he's still updating this or not, but there's about a dozen available to listen to, good stuff).
/r/becomeaman13/04/16 08:01 PM
2

You can't, but then again, I can't reconcile government and individualism either, so I think you'd be in good standing with most people if you imply that you support ALL individual rights. I disagree with saying "I'm a feminist", but using their own rhetoric to advance your own position is definitely Machiavellian.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:48 PM
1

Ah, yes... I am currently in an LTR with a woman that I got pregnant, accidentally (long story, and the source of an upcoming "askTRP" post, most likely). I tried to rationalize at the time that it would make things better, in the long run, but the logical part of my brain wouldn't allow for that eventuality. I wish that I had discovered TRP in the winter of 2013, rather than the spring of 2014, but regretting the past does nothing to change it.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:42 PM
2

Thank you, sincerely. I know there are limits to introspection, but this is great. The "5 Why's" especially; I've never heard or thought of this before but it makes good sense. The others are things I have aspired to make a part of my daily routine, failing to do so consistently thus far.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:36 PM
3

Another that I've heard (although I cannot recall were; nor can I claim it as my own) is of a map. You may be given a beautifully made map by a master cartographer and have every reason to believe that what it contains is true, but you won't actually know for yourself until you travel to the places thereon. Once you are there, walking the land or sailing the sea itself, you can confirm your knowledge as true, or, if necessary, revise it.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:23 PM
1

I don't think what he's saying is so much "shaming tactics" as saying that there is a distinct difference in the caliber of man that needs to resort to lying to make a woman desire him and one that does not. Perhaps not from an "alpha/beta" standpoint, but certainly from a strength of character perspective (though that is admittedly subjective), for most. In reference to the comments you made lower in this string about "pretending": I am going to conceal my future vasectomy. I am going to concea…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:17 PM
6

In the words of Oscar Wilde: "But good women have such limited views of life, their horizon is so small, their interests so petty."
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:11 PM
2

Are you referring to the way that people in the modern era talk about "self knowledge" and being so in-tune with themselves that they "just know" things, without evidence or reason to back them up? I run into that all the damn time. On the topic of motivations: I find that when I actually examine and try to put into words the reasons I am driven or inspired to take a particular course of action, my initial assumption doesn't hold water. Thinking about your comment, it makes me assume that few wo…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 07:07 PM
6

Wow, I fucking LOVE that puzzle analogy, thank you (I'll be shamelessly plagiarizing that in my own private conversations in the future). In all seriousness, that makes such good sense, and could be taken even farther. The idea of outlining your beliefs, making sure you have a solid framework from with to expand your knowledge, putting it into context, etc... It really is a good way to examine new information too: "Does this fit into the puzzle? Am I simply wishing that it did, because I want to…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 06:54 PM
4

I would imagine that a PI would have a hard time NOT being RP. After all, they spend most of their time investigating infidelity (or so I have heard) and in every case you're either dealing with (A) a woman fucking around behind a married man's back, or (B) a woman fucking a man she most likely knows is married, if he's the adulterous party. How often do you hear of men seeking out and latching onto married people the way that women do? If a man fucks a married woman, it's typically because he w…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 06:49 PM
3

Thanks for linking /r/becomeaman - have been reading on here on and off for the past 2 years and had never seen that referenced.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 06:27 PM
5

So, in other words, you're applying the Scientific Method (or something akin to it) to learned information before you assign actual weight to it? That makes a lot sense.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 06:24 PM
1

Understandable. Depends on a lot of things: how chubby she is, how good her hygiene is, whether her skin is still good, etc.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 06:13 PM
1

I politely, but strongly, disagree. You're claiming that nudity is inherently sexual, which it isn't; how would you explain the hundreds of thousands of years of human existence prior to the advent of clothing, or cultures that to this very day wear little or no clothing? Would you call every nude sculpture created by the Greeks, Romans and Renaissance masters "sexual" by nature? I think that's a narrow view to take of art. Porn is porn, art is art, and there is a line between them, though the p…
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 04:55 PM
3

Personally, if you or any other woman I was interested in posed for nude art, whether it was photographic or traditional paint and canvas, I most likely wouldn't care. This would depend on the nature of the images though, too. Nudity is our natural state and doesn't need to be sexualized in every situation, though that can be difficult to avoid or even determine; but hell, a bathing suit or dress that leaves just enough to the imagination can be MORE enticing, sexually, in many circumstances. Th…
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/16 09:51 AM
1

Thank you for doing this.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 11:27 PM
12

Fantastic quote. Never heard that before but it makes perfect sense. Reminds me of the great players of actual games, like Jordan or Gretzky. If all they did was carefully follow the accepted practices/steps of their discipline, they'd never have changed/revolutionized it.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:49 PM
7

Oh, I agree, completely - no need to stop unless you're told to. It's "affirmative consent" Gestapo that concerns me. In many cases, this is where being sufficiently skilled between the sheets works in your favor, after the fact. Shouldn't be hard to get an enthusiastic text/email/voicemail/whatever singing your praises that you can keep for future (hopefully unnecessary) use. See: Jian Gomeshi.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:45 PM
4

Guess that'd depend on how fat she is, how strong/hung you are. Can't see any disadvantages in the BJ dept. though. - You already know she loves to eat and hasn't met anything she wouldn't swallow.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:29 PM
0

I think if you make it clear that she could be far more attractive if she were fitter, you'd probably have the same effect. I'm not in the business of hurting women needlessly, but that could motivate someone to actually change their ass (literally). I've met many women in my life that had beautiful faces but were too heavy; they know this, and they know they need to lose it, but does denying them the satisfaction, so to speak, of being "validated" really outweigh the benefit you derive from enj…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:26 PM
17

I agree with you, but men need to be super careful about "touching when she says no" with the absurd number of false rape/assault accusations cropping up, and in some areas (probably many more in the future) the fact that you touched her thigh or pinched her ass may be enough to get YOUR ass thrown in jail (regardless of how much she enjoyed it at the time).
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:09 PM
2

"Don't ever argue with a feminist. Even though you've won, you have lost. " This. It's like the old joke about competing in the Special Olympics - win or lose, you're still a retard.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:01 PM
1

It's a strategy, the crocodile tears and the quivering lip... It taps into your innate desire as a man to be just and to spare women's feelings (primarily by means social conditioning); you feel bad that she is crying, so long as you are plugged in or still adjusting to TRP (which i am, for example) and naturally do anything you can to stop it. Often this manifests itself in men accepting blame or giving in to demands which, had they been issued with a dry eye, would have been laughable.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 06:18 PM
1

Exactly. They're much like volatile chemicals that cannot be mixed above a certain concentration without resulting in a violent explosion.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 05:39 PM
1

Please edit for grammar/spelling, etc.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 09:57 AM
2

Somehow I don't see that collective realization happening any time soon, unfortunately.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 08:27 AM
3

It's interesting to see another culture, so distant from our own, with a term analogous to the classic (now rarely used) "spinster" or "old maid" applied in the Western world to women that have approached or hit the wall without finding a mate. Good indicator that it's far more than a "social construct" and is, in fact, rooted in biological realities (that are too uncomfortable for the Strong, Independent Woman to acknowledge).
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 05:53 PM
2

Fantastic post. I wish I'd been aware enough to do this myself, in the past. "Counting coup" isn't something I'd have ever connected to this concept, but it really fits well. And I can only imagine what having that power and not using it does to your psyche/ego and intangible SMV.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 05:42 PM
5

I had the same problem with the introduction of Elektra in this (the 2nd) season of Daredevil. If they'd used a woman built like Gina Carano it would have been a bit easier to suspend disbelief, but when they cast a woman whose primary feature is her bones... I can't muster up enough suspension of disbelief to do anything but roll my eyes as she knocks down/out grown men with a single punch.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 05:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter