TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AccidentallyBorn Archive

View 1 posts and 127 comments by AccidentallyBorn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Australia hates men. It's quite funny, because their government has had multitudes of sex scandals and other shit highlighting depraved behaviour by men (gleefully seized upon by feminist activists to justify their hatred of men). But at the same time, the social and cultural barometer is extraordinarily anti-male. Good fucking luck if you're a male victim of DV in Australia, or worse, are a victim of contraception fraud. It's not surprising that every intelligent and successful Aussie man I kno…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 02:28 PM
1

Holy shit dude, are you me? This happened to me twice while I was at uni (ages 19-21).
/r/MensRights17/02/25 05:39 PM
5

FWIW I work at a company that aggressively has applied affirmative action policies (which I strenuously disagree with), yet has maintained hiring quality. It's possible to do both, though I wish companies would just stick to pure, blind candidate selection. Every woman I have worked with recently has been great, and it's become clear to me that most women have abilities that are extremely useful in engineering environments, which men generally do not possess. I cannot say the same for women I ha…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:15 PM
1

Your life is not the sum of your contribution or cost to soceity. The idea itself reduces a human being to a cog in a machine. You have more options than to maim or kill, this is a false dichotomy. Not really. Some people are going to attempt to kill themselves, and it is much more humane to offer them a dignified and peaceful exit than the barbaric horrors that suicidal people have to go through today. I also wasn't saying that mentally ill people are a burden, I was saying that post-suicide-at…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:32 AM
1

You act like it’s impossible to have a mental illness and live with dignity. What gave you that impression? I certainly don't believe that to be true. As if the only way to contribute to and have value in society is through capitalistic methods. Nope. I do not believe this and did not say or imply it. Your reasoning could be just as likely be used to justify eugenics. Please elaborate. I don't see how, without pretty egregious misinterpretation of what I've said. Because you direct the outcome t…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 11:51 PM
3

Suicide is final solution to a temporary problem That statement is false for many people who do not recover from depression. Calling every bad situation a temporary problem without any context is typical of toxic positivity. Unsympathetic cunt I actually wrote "unempathetic". Lacking in empathy for those who are chronically depressed (or even those who are not, but for whom life is sufficiently and irrevocably miserable that it isn't worth living). who’s seriously considered suicide a few times,…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:46 AM
1

On the flipside, my alternatives as a depressed person are brutal and dangerous, and likely to maim rather than kill, which places excess burden on not just me but the health system and society, which then has to support my disability. It is more ethical to allow depressed people to kill themselves. Being depressed is, in itself, a rational justification for suicide when the depression is recurrent and resistant to treatment. Depression should be considered a terminal illness in many cases, and …
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:45 AM
2

sane people don’t generally desire to kill themselves Disagree - a lot of sane people want to kill themselves. Most depressed people are sane. There are good, rational reasons to not want to live - they don't apply to everyone and not everyone may agree, but that doesn't make them irrational. and at that point it is a mercy killing. Which should also be legal. But I would argue that a chronically depressed person who lives in isolation and misery and does not respond to treatment would also be a…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:18 AM
1

I am envisaging a very narrow scope here of people who present themselves, sign a consent form in front of the administering physician and then are given the injection. Albeit perhaps following a two week cool down period wherein they are given time to reconsider. It wouldn't cover people who are not compos mentis.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 02:12 AM
8

When/if I go, it will be something catastrophically destructive, final, and there will be redundancy (this is called a "planned complex suicide" in the forensic literature). I also won't notify anyone ahead of time because it won't be a cry for help. One of the cruellest things about our society (imo) is that people will try to "help" others who have attempted suicide and are severely injured. I have no intention of surviving to live as a vegetable. It should be legal for someone to walk into a …
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:44 PM
3

Ahh, it's raining strawmen! (And very poor reading comprehension.)
/r/PussyPass17/04/22 04:26 AM
3

really, anyone who disagrees with you must be a misandrist pedophiliac religious nut You are misandrist if you're arguing that 15 year old boys getting raped is acceptable but the same thing happening to a girl is not. I didn't say you were religious. And you're at least a hebephile apologist based on your very strange comments. but I preferred to wait for you to admit you were giving up. I give up arguing with someone who is too stupid and/or biased to realise how sick their argument is. It doe…
/r/PussyPass17/04/22 03:02 AM
9

“Men do not have an inherent right to have sex with other men.” Not really the same thing, given that was justified under religion, whereas our laws around children are justified by research and our understanding of intellectual development in children. What if he was 16? What if he was 28? Where I am, 16 would be legal IF AND ONLY IF she was not in a position of power over him. I think that socially it would (and should) still be considered disgusting and wrong for an adult to have sex with a 1…
/r/PussyPass16/04/22 11:45 PM
12

Adults do not have an inherent right to have sex with children. Adults do not have an inherent right to have sex with other adults who are unable to or do not consent. Legislation around an area of behaviour rife with abuse and violation of others bodily sovereignty is not constitutionally or ethically suspect at all. Very strange things you are saying. Would you be okay with it if he was 5? 10? 13? What about if he was a girl? A line has to be drawn to protect children, and it has to be enforce…
/r/PussyPass16/04/22 03:33 PM
12

Very strange attitude to attempt to equate sexual exploitation of a minor to speeding, but okay mate.
/r/PussyPass16/04/22 03:35 AM
16

Statutory rape is rape. Minors cannot consent. So, yeah, she raped him.
/r/PussyPass16/04/22 02:08 AM
36

No no no, she didn’t rape him! He’s probably a horny 15 year old kid, which means she did him a favour. And of course now our misogynistic society has to vilify her for expressing her sexual freedom as an empowered woman! /s
/r/PussyPass08/04/22 12:58 PM
43

if there wasn’t a problem with men getting hired over equally or more qualified women then we wouldn’t need the outreach for girls and women regarding STEM education and career guidance. This is categorically false. There are a myriad possible explanations and multiple factors that contribute to women's perceived "underrepresentation" in STEM. The biggest being that most women just aren't naturally interested in tech or "things" as much as they are in people. There's loads of personality data sh…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:02 AM
2

As a tall-ish guy, I can’t say I have any experience with this exact brand of misandrist bullshit, but no matter what your height is, there will always be women who shit on one or more of your immutable characteristics. I know plenty of women who have absolutely zero issues with dating short men. Don’t take this BS to heart — women who talk and think like this aren’t actually the norm. They’re just the loud and unpleasant types that you tend to notice. The most important thing is to sort out you…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:06 AM
2

LOL, you know you’ve lost the argument when you have to stoop to that level.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:30 AM
7

It’s not terrible to remove foreskin. It is terrible. You are mutilating the penis. There are nerve endings in the glans that are not meant to be exposed to the outside and are protected by the foreskin, and removing the foreskin causes those to be overstimulated and become desensitised. The foreskin itself also contains a large number of nerve endings and removing it further reduces sexual pleasure. It is a disgusting thing to do to a non-consenting child, unless medically necessary. It’s neces…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:01 PM
4

No, the clitoris is EXACTLY the same as the penis. They are the same body part. I think you’re the one that needs to learn anatomy at this point. Just because the clitoris has some erectile tissue and the same nerve endings as the penis does not make it “EXACTLY the same”. The urethra doesn’t run through the clitoris, and the two differentiate from each other fairly early in foetal development. I can’t believe I’m having to argue this while you continue to miss the point: if it was a societal no…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 09:56 PM
6

Yeah, I am aware that the two are not exactly equivalent. However, I’d argue that someone’s penis is not equivalent to a clitoris, either. Removing someone’s foreskin is genital mutilation, which is why I made the comparison.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 09:00 PM
18

“Gynotikolobomassophile” is the word you’re after 😉
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:57 AM
82

I personally think ears look kinda gross. Definitely getting those lopped off my newborn, quicksmart!
/r/MensRights03/12/21 01:20 AM
171

Harmful like the clitoris.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:40 PM
2

People just think they're so awesome these days. Absolutely. This is a symptom of the "woke"/Critical Theory takeover of schools, and the associated "participation trophies" and other such ego-stroking mechanisms for the mediocre. I've argued with people on this many times, and the leftist types seem to consistently fail to understand that on a societal level, a small-group level and an individual level, people do not improve their behaviour or competencies unless incentivised to do so. I think …
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:20 AM
3

Yeah, I worry for my sister too. Some people get enraged to the point that they forget that just like “the patriarchy” not being all of the evil men holding women down, the state of feminism/the dating scene isn’t a conspiracy of all women either. Honestly, I think dating apps and the commoditisation and commercialisation of sex and romance plays a major part in the state of the current dating scene. The best “revenge” would be a revolution in equality that destroys the feminist movement as it e…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 03:10 AM
1

*TRP And it’s “The Red Pill”.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 02:17 AM
6

The woman who was convincing my ex to leave me is now a fat, purple-haired man hating radical feminist. You can't make this shit up. She would be seen on Facebook posting feminist shit and how guy after guy mistreats her and that every time she met (fucked) a new guy they were just more proof that all men are shit. How wholly unsurprising… What is it with purple hair and radfems?! She sounds like a truly awful person. And yet she can get laid on the regular on Tinder. Men have no shame. Yup, tha…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 12:21 AM
11

Out of curiosity: how is she doing now? Back in a relationship? Bitter and alone? Does she miss her kids? These stories break my heart. I’m so sorry you had to go through this.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:08 PM
2

Thank you for not supporting genital mutilation. I consider myself very lucky to be uncircumcised. Kind of a weird thought, that as a privileged member of a developed society, I consider myself “lucky” to not have been mutilated at my parents’ behest, but that’s the world we live in. Your son will thank you, believe me.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 12:31 AM
1

Okay, so you meant “liberation from the fact that women have to sit to piss when men don’t”, whereas I read “liberation from having to sit to piss in general”. It was a misunderstanding. But for the record, I kind of disagree. It’s not really a major advantage in the vast majority of situations, and courtesy of modern technology, women can also trivially piss standing up. Why don’t we just put urinals in women’s bathrooms for women who happen to be carrying Shewees?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 07:53 AM
2

I see urinals as a liberation from having to sit to piss.... That statement. The most sensible interpretation seems to be that you think that a guy using a cubicle must be sitting down, which is obviously incorrect. And that prompted me to ask my original question about whether this was normal where you were from. Clearly we are not on the same page so I don’t really see any benefit in continuing this conversation.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 07:41 AM
3

I explicitly stated I grew up doing what you say you do and yet you ask if it's common. I don’t sit when I piss. You’re the one that needs better reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:03 AM
2

I see urinals as a liberation from having to sit to piss... Since when have men ever had to sit to piss? Was that commonplace where you grew up (genuine question)? I regularly piss on the soil around the back of the garage when I’m working outside. It doesn’t mean that in the 21st century where privacy is valued, that it’s okay to expect all men to piss standing up and without privacy in public venues. I don’t mind if others want to use urinals, like I said, I acknowledge that they can be practi…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 03:31 AM
10

I know urinals are largely a norm perpetuated historically by men (and practicality), but I still hate it. Apparently you cannot read. Also I never blamed anyone in particular for it, and certainly not women. Men’s rights is about rights, not blame.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 03:25 AM
6

I refuse to use urinals unless I’m absolutely desperate. Even though they’re workable, I find it offensive that the assumption is that men can be treated like dogs, and just piss in a little densified row of troughs with no privacy, while women get extra cubicles to do their business in comfort. I know urinals are largely a norm perpetuated historically by men (and practicality), but I still hate it. Just another example of subtle disparities between men and women that make our lives just that l…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 02:11 AM
11

They won’t. It’ll probably be settled out of court and the media won’t cover it because it goes against the narrative.
/r/PussyPass27/06/21 01:28 PM
9

all while promotions will favour them as internal diversity initiatives make it nearly impossible for you to advance in your career, regardless of your contributions or performance. I’m dealing with this at the moment. Large tech firm, almost no “high impact, medium effort” work is ever assigned to the junior men. It all goes to the junior female engineers first and foremost, and oh look who gets promoted first! Conversely, the junior male engineers get the “low impact, high effort” work and are…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:45 PM
3

Oh, for sure! I think “brutal cunt” probably doesn’t do justice to the level of vileness that creature embodies. I’m not sure any words do, tbh. Heartless indeed.
/r/PussyPass16/06/21 04:14 AM
4

Inert gas is a fairly peaceful way to go, actually. I’d love to know how she got him to take the sedatives though. Sounds like she might have convinced him to commit suicide or something. That or she slipped drugs into his food.
/r/PussyPass16/06/21 12:49 AM
21

Jokes on them, guys don’t even look at their profile before swiping most of the time, so swipes mean absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:57 PM
36

Yeah but that’s just because men are dumber /s
/r/MensRights12/06/21 11:30 AM
1

That’s absolutely disgusting. It does seem only a couple of posters are spamming a bunch of autofellatio on the hashtag. I’m not a supporter of MGTOW as I think it’s destructive and not a valid solution to misandry and men’s issues, but I’ve reported those fuckers anyway. Unbelievable that anyone would do that and think it’s somehow virtuous or right. They have no morals, and they’re willingly and intentionally suppressing free (non-hate, in most cases) speech. Also, this kind of coordinated cam…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 12:20 AM
24

They are? Source? That’s absolutely fucking vile if true.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 09:25 AM
1

I’m a dude, with a long term partner on a six-figure income, myself earning over $200k per year at a tech company, and climbing. But thanks for coming clean about your opinion that women belong in the kitchen/home and not in careers of their own. I’m sure it really makes this sub look great to outsiders.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 04:59 AM
2

Ok, bud.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 04:07 AM
5

So you can either believe an actual guy who is giving you the male perspective or you can listen to the headlines and articles of whatever propaganda news source you allow yourself to be influenced by currently. To get the male perspective listen to Kevin Samuel’s on you tube, it might open your eyes to how men think rather than another woman feminist writer telling you how we think. Dude, I am a guy. You're not talking to a brainwashed feminist simp, either; I fucking hate feminism and the femi…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 05:06 AM
3

There isn’t anything wrong with that but you were sold that idea I wasn't "sold" the idea, I formed it naturally after growing up in a family where my mother, her mother, and my aunt all hold postgraduate science or engineering degrees and were able to happily raise their family while working professionally (albeit with some career sacrifices which I know my mother is still bitter about). What I am putting forward is a natural concept of fairness; it's no one's place to say what anyone else shou…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 04:00 AM
13

I wonder what type of guy it takes to think that all men are inherently rapists, etc. Surely it must reflect very poorly on the men who believe that shit, because they must feel it somehow reflects themselves.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 02:38 AM
5

There's nothing wrong with a woman doing what she wants with her life. If she wants to be an engineer, or a doctor, or a lawyer, that doesn't make her any less attractive imo (actually it makes her more attractive). I do know what you mean about when you talk about unhappy working women though -- there are definitely a subset of women who go into high pressure careers because they want to make lots of money and beat the patriarchy. Those women are miserable. Usually horrible coworkers/bosses too…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 02:36 AM
1

I know this is a serious issue but it reminded me of this video, which is very entertaining and relatable (for me at least).
/r/MensRights28/05/21 09:53 AM
12

whereas in Floyd’s case the pressure is negligible Source? A knee on the neck is not “negligible” in most cases, and could absolutely block your wind pipe. and not a cause of death (he OD’d). I believe there were multiple causes of death, like with this case, and one of them was being asphyxiated. Either way, black person or white person, both of these cases are fucking disgusting treatment of another human by cops.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:33 PM
28

They are ugly human beings, even if not physically unattractive.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 01:47 PM
3

No worries! They chose a confusing way to word it - I only noticed because I scrolled back up a little bit to read the thing above it.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:13 PM
14

BuT iT aLsO mAkEs ThEm MoRe ViOlEnT
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:05 PM
11

Yeah, progressives don’t give a fuck about progress. The only “progress” they want to achieve is on their political agenda.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:04 PM
43

It’s just a total man-hating cesspit. I went there once and found them literally stating as fact that men’s brains were less capable of handling emotion and that’s why “men are more violent”. And of course they ban all male commenters and dissenting women so it’s just a circlejerk of constant pseudoscience, lies and misandry. Like most woke or feminist-aligned subreddits.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:02 PM
8

Nah that’s under the “we do not” section. But generally it’s a crap subreddit full of simps and ideologically indoctrinated men. Not worth the time.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:59 PM
2

Your reading comprehension is clearly not fine. Her point was that women are believed and that men should be too.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:50 AM
6

There’s no real day to day tension because everyday people are already totally indoctrinated by it and don’t understand that they’re already supporting a racist and sexist ideology. If you point out any of the flaws, the vast majority of everyday people will think you’re a fascist. That in itself is a sign that things are terminal.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:31 PM
1

It’s clearly not that, but whatever.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 06:39 PM
2

Yes: calling someone’s genuine effort to understand an issue that this community cares about deeply “bullshit” is extremely rude. You can choose to be an unprovoked asshole on the internet, but don’t claim it’s the status quo.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 06:34 PM
1

No need to be so rude. They’re relevant questions - a lot of people have been massively impacted by the lockdowns and stress associated with the pandemic. Even where I am, in NZ, it’s taken a major toll on many people’s mental health, and we have basically no community transmission at all.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 11:13 AM
1

It’s probably a requirement for ethics approval. Any researcher would likely get in trouble for not having this these days.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 11:11 AM
21

If this unfairness to women creates greater awareness of the issue then I’m totally fine with it. It should be used as an opportunity to fix the ridiculousness of it for ALL divorcees. Now, if the rules were changed to only apply to men, that would be a different story…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:03 AM
3

100%. The “it’s only a vocal minority” defence is getting very old, quickly. My leftist family members often make this comment as if they are somehow not absolutely spreading the toxic shit around with their preaching about “systemic racism” and “systemic sexism” and “rape culture”. It’s all intertwined and it’s toxic and evil as hell. Wokeness and the far left need to be knocked back, hard, by the sane and educated people remaining in our society.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:27 PM
1

Imagine if we had something equivalent like “things vags says” or whatever You mean like… “r/pussypassdenied”? Like, I agree that FDS is a shit subreddit, but let them make jokes at our expense. Humour (and free speech) is an important part of life and we shouldn’t be trying to shut down offensive jokes or speech IMO. Let them spout their misandrist shit for the world to see. Eventually the tides will turn and they’ll be the bad guys.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:24 PM
1

I disagree with that comparison - superficially they sound the same but there are a few factors you’re not considering. (Tl;dr: victim risk profiles are different between bad men and bad women.) Rape is (rightfully) highly illegal and high risk for the perpetrator, and it can only occur in specific, mostly avoidable circumstances. I can totally understand women being uncomfortable around men at night when they’re alone for example. Avoiding that is a reasonable risk mitigation strategy (for men …
/r/MensRights01/03/21 05:25 AM
7

While I partly agree here, and there are obviously decent, wonderful women out there (likely more than there are bad ones), the crazy feminists and wokists have made it, to an extent, risky to interact with any women. So I can totally understand and relate to OP’s fear, especially given his previous experiences. I’ve never had anything remotely like he experienced - only some very public humiliation and abuse - but even after just that I am ultra-wary of women I don’t know and avoid interacting …
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:48 PM
4

Yeah, Jezebel taking this comment and using it out of context to smear MRAs in 3... 2... 1...
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:03 PM
3

While I find these kinds of studies encouraging and the results here are somewhat unsurprising, we need to acknowledge that this was a regional study with a pretty small sample size. Hopefully over time enough of these studies will show up, building a base of strong literature that supports the fact that men are in fact very commonly victims of abuse, physical and mental. But this study alone is not particularly compelling.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:25 AM
70

Yeah, that stood out to me too. You can literally hear him saying "I'm warning you" etc. It's not like she didn't know what was coming, and it looks like the teacher was waiting for it too.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 07:43 PM
11

No, they were just saying that we shouldn't wish horrible things on women. Which we shouldn't. That this happens to anyone is despicable; we should be angry for Adele (and the remaining very few women who this has happened to), not taking joy in her/their suffering. Edit: I now see that the headline is incorrect and she likely will only pay half, if not less. If that's true, then I have less of an issue with it.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:01 PM
17

Cleaner link: http://archive.is/FYty6
/r/MensRights28/03/20 04:04 PM
5

I actually think there's a sizeable number who are just straight up evil. They know perfectly well that women are violent, but they don't want it to affect their campaigns for funding or whatever, so they deliberately perpetuate misinformation. It's the only way I can explain otherwise intelligent people acting in such a ridiculous manner.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:13 PM
1

Hear hear. I don't care if people make sweeping, clearly light hearted jokes about groups of people. However when some groups get special protection over others, things are clearly fucked.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:22 PM
1

"Islam is RIGHT about women!"
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:59 PM
24

So, not killing yourself to save a woman is hatred now?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:31 AM
13

Nah, not until the effects start appearing in force. Until then, talking about it is "alt-right misogyny" 🙄
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:09 AM
11

I doubt that is true. Perhaps it would be ten or more years in the US. In Australia it would likely not be much longer than she got. That said, I agree she got off lightly. Considering the pain and distress she cost that guy and his family (not to mention actual monetary cost), two years in a cushy women's prison seems barely more than a token gesture. Edit: r/woooosh
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:49 AM
4

I appreciate the sentiment behind the post, but the "this is powerful" caption is just painfully cheesy. Like... If it was powerful, it sure as fuck isn't anymore!
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:44 PM
24

As a child I had this drilled into my mind so hard that it took three abusive girlfriends over eight years for me to have an epiphany: over half of the abusive people I know (both in intimate relationships and platonic/workplace) are actually women. Once my eyes were opened to that, I felt so angry and betrayed by society. So much bullshit about masculinity vs. femininity is spouted as fact, and it sickens me how much of our day to day lives and attitudes are governed by these incorrect assumpti…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 01:35 PM
13

Most guys in STEM would love there to be more women. Unfortunately for all of us, it's very clear that statistically, women are far less likely to naturally gravitate towards the kind of thinking and problem solving in STEM. Most women simply do not care about those things. Period. This has been backed up by the clear trend in extremely feminist countries (such as Sweden) of fewer women going into STEM, because they can earn just as much by doing traditionally female jobs. To be clear, I'm not s…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 02:02 PM
6

I've had around 10 sexual partners over the past 4 years or so. Only one long running relationship for the last 2.5 or so though. Two of those four years were in college... I wouldn't say that's a huge number. Definitely isn't compared to some of the actually attractive dudes I was mates with. I'm a pretty average looking guy - some of those guys were literally sleeping with multiple different women every weekend. Not saying that's a good thing... But 6 definitely isn't an unreasonable number!
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:47 PM
7

Sorry, what? I own my car. If my girlfriend is screaming at me and hitting me, and demanding I give her the keys to my car, and I refuse... Is that illegal in the UK? What a fucking joke. TIL I'm a domestic abuser...
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:40 AM
13

Glad I'm not the only one with this experience. I actually let my gf penetrate me with a small toy, out of curiosity and trust more than any particular desire. I'd read all over the web that it feels "amazing" and you have a super intense "prostate orgasm". Nope... It literally just felt like I was taking a massive, perpetual shit. It felt "good" in the same way that dropping a huge log feels "good." Wasn't awful or anything, but I have no idea how anyone could enjoy, let alone orgasm from it. N…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:14 AM
34

In my opinion, people with extreme mental health issues should be forcibly injected with the medication which helps them – screw human rights. How grotesque that the state incessantly nannies and lectures and taxes the non-mad over what they ingest, and lets the insane do as they please! enhance screw human rights. Yeah, that sums her attitude up right there! She seems like a wonderful person...
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:30 PM
11

Are you serious? You're either not provoking any critical discussion or a a much luckier person than me then! I've had a Tinder date (someone who I had come to genuinely trust and like) publish intimate details in my (unsurprisingly, feminist) college magazine about our sexual encounters and personal text messages (with my identity clear for all to see and her own hidden behind a pseudonym) and claim I was unhappy about it because "you just don't like how I am empowering myself." And before that…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:03 PM
13

If by "bad examples" you mean hugely powerful political players pushing anti-male narrative and treating men's rights as an alternative to women's righrs, rather than complementary, then I think that's a valid criticism of the movement. Yes, people shitpost about silly little girls on Tumblr, but there is a huge amount of real misandry shown by feminist policymakers too. See here for a more detailed examination.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:58 PM
14

mens rights are included in feminism too Hardly. Feminism is based upon the belief that society's problems stem from a "patriarchy", and makes some fundamental assumptions about the nature of men and masculinity that inherently lend towards anti-male opinions. This comment by an ex-feminist sums it up better than I could.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:54 PM
20

That warrants self defense. Fucking grotesque behaviour. I'm sorry that happened to you.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 02:36 PM
12

Thank you for writing this. It's eloquent, pointed and well researched. I shall be saving this comment for future reference :)
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:24 PM
8

I've had men message me on social media with my home address and "See you soon," before deactivating. Jesus... That's terrifying! Sent shivers down my spine. I'm really sorry that happened to you. No matter your political views, no one should have to fear expressing their opinions. I don't think it's fair for either side to say it's unreasonable to be afraid of the other. I think (as you've said) that the issue here is grouping people unfairly. Most MRAs are normal men and women, who for one rea…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:46 AM
3

I wouldn't even call it particularly subtle - it was just about the first thing he said when he brought up gender differences. There are a lot of people wilfully ignoring the nature of what he's trying to say, just so they can take offence at it (imo). I also liked his comment about people being treated as individuals. That sums up my entire view on the "diversity" issue. Respect/value me for my skills, not my skin colour, gender, religion or country of origin. That's all I'd ask of a potential …
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:24 PM
1

Rightfully so, because it's bullshit. Man, the more I read about gender politics and equality in general, the more angry I get. Why can't we just treat everyone the same? It's been made so much harder than it needs to be, and I think a lot of that comes down to bitterness and whining instead of focusing on the problems at hand. It's like modern day society has just encouraged every possible grouping of people to bitch about how THEY have the shittiest deal. Women, men, transgender people, univer…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:10 PM
35

"His body, his decision."
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:57 AM
8

r/titlegore
/r/MensRights02/04/17 01:14 AM
2

Really? I got a lot of support and advice there while dealing with an abusive (now ex) girlfriend. What exactly is awful about it? Every post I've seen involving cheating has shamed the cheater, male or female.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:56 AM
1

Not all women are being whiny about the male contraceptive trial. I wasn't talking about women experiencing side effects, I was talking about women posting this shit on Facebook. Also I'm a guy. I sympathise with the people affected by the drug trial and I fully understand how serious the effects were.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 02:30 AM
7

You are honestly the ones who are being whiny here. C'mon... not ALL women are being whiny. Let's not put them in the same group. Some idiot Facebook/Tumblr feminists and leftist media outlets are pushing this story.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:20 AM
3

Every thread is a chance for a new discussion. No need to bring up old arguments from threads that participants here may or may not have seen (I personally don't get involved that often and haven't seen much stuff on circumcision anyway).
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:05 AM
6

I wasn't providing that as the only reason, and I wasn't saying it to feel superior. My understanding is that circumcision actually has some benefits when it comes to sex - circumcised guys can often last longer before ejaculating, which many women like. My argument was more trying to focus on the fact that circumcision makes permanent and in some cases (for some individuals) destructive changes, and therefore it should be a matter of choice.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:04 AM
4

You're right. There are people who will make noise about this stuff to get attention, and for no other reason. That, however, doesn't detract from the fact that morally and ethically, performing a potentially harmful surgery on children who cannot consent to it, is wrong. It would be equally wrong if the surgery was Asian parents having the "eyelid cut" surgery that makes their kids look European. The fact that it's surgery on the dick and is so widespread makes it a men's issue, but in any situ…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:35 AM
1

Ever seen that clip of the 4-way split penis ejaculation? Um... The man has pretty much no cock left, just snake-like shreds. NOPE.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:29 AM
6

Yeah exactly bro, just think about some titties and you'll orgasm. Shit, you can orgasm without even having a dick at all - it's all in your head! Real men don't need physical pleasure, they just ejaculate on mental command bro. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:10 AM
6

Nobody in this thread has said that. The OP doesn't say that either. I think think we both have a sufficient grasp of English to comprehend (and communicate intelligently) regarding this topic, but instead you have chosen to act condescendingly and throw insults. Perhaps, in the future you should take the time to understand other people's views, and present reasoned rebuttal, instead of delivering unprovoked ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:06 AM
3

Cool, good for you mate. I'm not particularly scared of women either, in fact I love spending time around females (and occasionally taking one home). I don't see what this has to do with circumcision though. It's good that your experiences have been neutral/positive, but the same does not apply for other men who have been circumcised, usually involuntarily. It's a logical fallacy to assume your experiences are the only possible outcome.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:01 AM
10

Dude. Nobody is saying circumcision is evil or wrong. What we are saying is that it should be the choice of someone to have that procedure, knowing the risks. If you want a 'clean cock', and you believe that the best way to achieve that is surgically removing part of your dick... No one is saying you can't, or shouldn't. But it's not okay to take that decision away from a child. Frankly if you don't see the problem with that, then your understanding of ethics is questionable.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:03 AM
6

I am not circumcised (partly because my parents are doctors, and despite being Christian, understood the risks). I am speaking from a background of medical knowledge (though I'm not a doctor) and having spoken to guys about circumcision. Incidentally, orgasm is not "in the mind"; it's a physiological response, during which hormone levels change to relieve stress, and the "mind" shuts down or is functionally depressed for several seconds. At least do some research before refuting what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:55 AM
15

Not everyone feels the way you do. Circumcision removes thousands of nerve endings, making orgasm more difficult to attain, causing a whole raft of other unnatural potential complications, and exposing the glans to long term direct contact with abrasive clothing, etc. Now, the vast majority of circumcised men probably live very normal lives and do not encounter issues as a result of their surgery. However, there are people who do suffer as a result, and given it's a totally unnecessary procedure…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:37 AM
1

I wish I'd been that ballsy though. I was also nervous as fuck and did my Y11 speech on swatting and cybercrime. Feminism would have been so much more pertinent, given the class's teacher and environment.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:14 AM
5

Haha, the same crazy teacher had me given a ~3 hour after school detention (quite a serious punishment, generally reserved for the real ratbags) for "insolence". The insolence being, I interrupted her rant on how a matriarchal society would be superior. I pointed out that her metaphor of female spiders (killing off the males) was somewhat insufficient, due to the fact that (female and male) spiders are rather limited in their intellectual capacity and biological complexity. Not sure why that was…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:27 AM
35

God I wish I'd had the courage to present on something like this while I was in school. I had a sexist, man-hating feminist English teacher, and to present something like this would have been wonderfully satisfying. Alas, 15 year old me was too scared of being expelled or otherwise punished.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:37 PM
4

whether he thinks it's fair that men only get 2 weeks paternity leave and women get 6 months Yeah, his answer there was a bit off on that. Clearly they should be the same.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:35 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights27/10/16 04:11 PM
1

Is there a mirror for this?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:58 PM
159

As mentioned by /u/rexpogo: Apparently "the police were already involved and they looked at everything and told the boy he was clear. Infact they even asked if he wanted to press charges on the girl." This is the real story here. The cops didn't discriminate against the guy, and actually upheld the law despite the genders being reversed. This is a win for equality and men's rights! Of course that part won't be reported in the media, just like the first 20s of the video where she kicks him in the…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:48 AM
24

... or she's exploiting her history of seizures to add to the drama in a plausible way.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:46 AM
0

Thank you - this is the point I was originally trying to get across. Direct retaliation is very rarely the smartest response to violence.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:55 PM
1

He could have left the area and broken up with his abusive now-ex.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 12:26 PM
0

Yes, to be fair that's probably a reasonable assumption. I just think that he could have dealt with it without punching her, and out of self interest, punching someone is a pretty bad option.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 10:05 AM
20

Yeah. We do it for ethnicity too. Scholarships and special school places (and council seats) are targeted based on ethnicity/race rather than on socioeconomic position. Very poor white kids don't get the same benefits and opportunities as very poor Maori kids. It's truly fucked, and no one seems to see the issue.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:18 AM
6

Press charges if you must. DO NOT RETALIATE. That's exactly what she wants, and it immediately puts her in the right in the eyes of the law and general public.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:07 PM
–

Such a poignant portrayal of an all round abusive relationship. My ex used to call me a pussy for not hitting back when she punched me and gouged my arms. Not a pussy, just not a fucking idiot without self control either. Our relationship could so easily have been like this video.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:05 PM
2

Agreed. Also, I think that the fact that she was "bubbly" and sociable is actually a gender-related behaviour as well. Hot women usually are flirty, because the entire world bends over to kiss their ass, all the time.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter