| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | CMV: sexual abundance for women isn’t as bad as they say it isThe moderators here should really put a rule against ad hominem attacks. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/06/21 02:51 PM |
| 2 | [CMV] Men are thinking about dating all wrong in today's market, the goal should be to not get screwed overbut looks aren't the only thing that matters They are, by far, the one which are the most immediately apparent and at the same time the most immutable. All traits that might be on display simply serve to signal genetic fitness. So someone with bad skin, for example, would be involuntarily signalling about some sort of health defect and even though the person judging them might think that they are rejecting them for some other reason, they might be unconsciously weighing in on the superficial fac… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/06/21 05:59 AM |
| 4 | [CMV] Men are thinking about dating all wrong in today's market, the goal should be to not get screwed overGet looks What are genes? I get that there is a lot of scope of improvement in looks (especially among men), but if you can pick up a dumbbell, so can the Chad. There are hard "ceilings" to how much you can improve. And for a very many men, this ceiling is what I would call "low". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/06/21 03:37 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter