TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AceFlashheart Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by AceFlashheart on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I defer to your superior 50 shades knowledge. I'll admit: I've never actually read the book. ​ The point remains though - it's the female power fantasy, and that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:38 PM
1

Its truly astounding how much content is geared to female audiences compared to western nations Is it astounding? This was basically the norm for the west prior to the rise of post 1960's insanity. The lack of specifically gendered media* is downstream of the delusions of western intellectuals, downplaying innate sex differences. Ironically the more "sexist" east-Asia produces more media that women actually enjoy. *I am overgeneralizing here, obviously 'gendered media' does still exist, it's jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:58 PM
5

50 shades of Grey also fits this trope. A 30 year old billionaire who apparently doesn't need to spend any time actually running his company, as he spends all day being the perfect, affectionate domme dom.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:35 PM
0

If you gender swapped what you just said it’d be the exact same thing as feminist rhetoric. No it wouldn't for the simple reason that what I am saying is true and 'feminist rhetoric' is not true. There's no utility in producing a false equivalency between someone saying something correct and someone saying something dishonest. When I said: "Women are not oppressed by society, only by their biology." The 'opposite talking point' would be: Biology is irrelevant to differences in outcomes between m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 05:14 PM
1

"Women are not oppressed by society, only by their biology." "Feminism has made more women miserable than it's made happy." "Being a "nice guy"/blue pill guy is not in the majority of cases the best way to be seen as attractive to women." Examine even the text of your opening post. "Both started off as a response to the unfair hand their group was dealt in society" - When exactly in history do you think that were women dealt 'an unfair hand' by their society? When exactly in history do you think…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:54 PM
4

There's more truth in redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 10:11 PM
2

Do you think that this is some sort of insightful observation? Yes, people are motivated by the envy of others. People resent others success when they cannot easily emulate it. Something which is inevitable in a world of genetic and social inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:11 PM
1

Men who have zero success with women are doing something really wrong Perhaps, but this is phrased dishonestly. Yes if you have literally zero standards anyone can find someone. But in reality when we talk about 'success' the invisible qualifier here is 'with someone they are attracted too'. If your goal is to get together with a, even moderately, attractive women then no, the bar is not low. If anything far higher for men generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:17 PM
1

No, men and women are not the exact same. We have different cocktails of hormones, creating different strengths and weaknesses. But i would argue that most of the differences this sub points to as being inherent qualities of the genders are 90% socialized and boil down to the child/parent roles of patriarchy. It's more than just the hormones, neuroanatomy differs markedly between the sexes. Stanford U has a fairly good summery here. For a more recent study on gene expression in the brains of mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 09:38 AM
0

He had some convictions. "America is in decline and needs someone competent to 'fix' it." - something else he was right about btw. I'm not arguing that the man was a great president, that obviously wasn't true, just that most progressive hatred of him had less to do with what he was wrong about and more to do with what he was right about, e.g. "Someone doing the raping?", "Islam is not a religion of peace", "China-flu." etc. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 06:38 PM
1

Intelligence disparities? Oh goody, I love this topic! The study, conducted by Erasmus University, Rotterdam, concluded that men’s average IQ is four points above women’s because their brains are usually larger. Scientist used the latest scanning techniques to measure the volumes of 896 brains. Volunteers were also subjected to a number of different intelligence tests. The results found that men had an average brain volume of 1.2 litres compared with one litre for women, and that people with big…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 06:21 PM
1

There’s no shortage of handsome men who have their lives together. There is? I'd image that both handsome-ness and financial stability together are a rarity, and such men, being highly desirable, have the greatest freedom to pass you over for a more attractive woman. Why settle for someone I could never accept? That's kinda the point here, we're analysing the pathology of why you 'couldn't accept' a guy who you thought was handsome/attractive/stable because he held different (read: correct) poli…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 06:21 PM
1

Right, as evidenced by the progressive utopia's of San Francisco, Seattle and Portland. N.B. Note that I could replace the above with almost any progressive dominated city in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 06:12 PM
1

And this?: Just as a thought experiment, if you met a Christian woman who said something along the lines of "Under no circumstances would I ever consider dating a Christ-killing Jew" what would your opinion on that be? Considering that a difference in religious beliefs could equally considered a reflection of one's core "beliefs", no?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 06:00 PM
0

Trump may have been a mess, but he was right on major policy positions relating immigration, foreign entanglements and the US trade relationship with China. If Trump was a fool, then his progressive critic is whatever is beneath a fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 05:58 PM
1

They're only able to date a small pool of women who are fucked-up and self-hating enough to consider dating someone with an ideology around hating them. This is such a strawman. Opposing the dishonesty that is feminism/progressivism generally = hating women. Just as reminder, feminism doesn't appear to have actually made women happy, which is a fairly good indicator that it's garbage. Meanwhile respectful feminist men living in big liberal cities get all the dates and relationships they want whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:39 AM
1

why would young women sign up for that? Cuz 'freedom' has made them miserable. Doubly so if they desire marriage/kids but can't find a partner. While you're correct to say that overwhelmingly ubiquitous progressive propaganda and it's general institutional power has made progressivism a 'big tent' that fact has nothing to say about w/e or not progressives have anything true or salient to say, or w/e or not most women would be happier with a man with progressive man vs a 'trad' guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:35 AM
1

Yeah, I don't get why guys who so loudly say they want tradwives would even care about Democratic/left-wing women not dating them. Ideally you convert the left-winger into a trad-wife. Women do after all, get more conservative when they get married/have kids. /u/TomorrowsWar - easy to say, but harder to swallow is the realization that "being too smart to be a progressive" is a detriment in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:32 AM
1

Maybe it’s because women don’t like to be told what to do with their bodies (abortion) This is such an America-centric worldview. Not every Republican even supports making abortion illegal. FYI "pro-lifers" are more likely to be women than men. It's more accurate to say that as progressivism becomes more overtly a religious cult, it is demonstrating ever greater intolerance of non-believers. I think this much more succinctly explains the issue, rather than erroneously trying to pin the blame on …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:29 AM
1

Edit: I should note this trend also exists in the UK, where debate on abortion is practically non existent. Because it has nothing to do with abortion. Progressivism is a religious, women tend to be more religious than men, and fanatics don't marry outside of their cults. The tends to explain the phenomenon far more succinctly than trying to pin it down to a single policy differential.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:25 AM
1

Men care more about sex than about ethics. Women prefer to keep their ethics when it comes to sex. Please, there's nothing particularly 'ethical' about refusing to date someone because they are right about something that you are wrong about. "Political" discrimination is just religious discrimination in drag. As progressivism becomes more cult-like and fanatical it's highly unsurprising that it's adherents show ever greater intolerance of dissent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:23 AM
1

They are thinking of the future of the relationship. I think you're giving women too much credit. Progressivism is basically a religion at this point, and women are more likely to be religious than men are. If one understands progressive discrimination vs non-progressives as a kind of extension of religious discrimination then it makes sense that the more fanatical party (i.e. the progressives) would be more likely to say "I would never date outside my faith".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:20 AM
1

So a guy could be handsome, well off, funny, witty, considerate of his partner and you still wouldn't ever consider them as a potential romantic consideration due to political differences? Just as a thought experiment, if you met a Christian woman who said something along the lines of "Under no circumstances would I ever consider dating a Christ-killing Jew" what would your opinion on that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:18 AM
1

Please God, the people who made 'Russiagate' a thing don't get to pretend that you have a leg up in intellect over anyone. Disagreeing with the progressive cargo cult =/= stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 10:15 AM
0

Wouldn't be better for men to not know what other, more sexually successful men, are getting? Should men stop watching porn at all and uninstall all hook up aps from their phones? Yeah but not for this reason. Porn is an addictive drug that has a warping effect on your brain. I really do believe that it's the silent epidemic of the 21st. century. Prob. 10 porn addict (mostly men, but more women than you'd think) for every 1 meth or opioid addict.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 11:38 AM
8

I dated two girls at the same time once... never again. The drama is a horror show. The first relationship commandment is as follows: "Open relationships only work for gay men."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 11:34 AM
1

It may be a reflection on the fact that men and women tend to have different interests and enjoy different things in different amounts. The things that women find interesting may bore men, the things that men find interesting may be boring to women. I don't think it's accurate to say "men are more interesting than women" since undoubtedly the average man is exactly that, average. But it may be accurate to say "From the male perspective, the average woman is uninteresting". There one picture that…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/19 01:25 AM
2

I don't agree. I understand that hiring an illegal immigrant to do your housework is an option available to upper middle-class women, but most women are not upper middle class. My own mother was a single parent who raised me in relative deprivation. Hiring a maid or cleaner would have been an impossibility for us growing up, and this was on a relatively solid teachers salary. The reality is for most women who are not a) hyper-intelligent and capable b) hyper-wealthy (i.e. can afford servants) th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 03:54 PM
3

The "50's balance" though is predicated on having the housewife completely dedicate herself to home life. I was talking more about the perspective of the woman who thinks she can have a high flying career and have 3 kids and a loving husband. It's technically possible, but only a tiny fraction of women will be able to achieve it. For most women picking one (probably the family) and focusing on that is the wise decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 01:32 PM
3

Do they not? Honestly I think women are more negatively effected by societies various lies than men are. "You can have it all :D career and a good family life", is probably the most pernicious, stupid and widespread lie of them all, also the lie that has undoubtedly done the most harm to society generally. Edit: Article from The Guardian about 'the paradox of declining female happiness'. Worth reading in the context of this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 01:12 PM
1

To be clear, I'm not saying that men are useless. I'm saying their usefulness is declining at a rate faster than that of female usefulness. Perhaps, but "declining" isn't the same thing as "redundant". We're still having this conversation on phones/computers designed by men, powered by electricity running through power lines dug by men, constructed by men etc. etc. etc. I still think "Women need men for superficial societal reasons" is hilariously underplaying the massive societal contributions …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 10:12 PM
4

This is lacking awareness. Women are dependent on the labor of men in a way that men just aren't dependent on the labor of women. This has to be taken into account when you're discussion which gender 'needs' the other more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 08:38 PM
3

Also IQ and it's links to discipline. Smarter people are less likely to "let themselves go".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 06:26 AM
1

Obligatory. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:00 PM
1

Why bother silencing nonesense? He's scaring off advertisers?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:56 PM
64

It matters but not nearly as much as her looks. Men will overlook a massive number of glaring personality issues in a women who's smoking hot that they never would in a less attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 03:22 PM
1

Conservative political views tend to correlate to physical strength. So I think they would be far more represented among the beaters than the beatees.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:20 AM
3

We do "pay for it" traffic drives advertiser content. Most of us here have bought gold also at some time or another. /u/subgamer90 is correct, it's censorship without the censors willing/wanting to admit their authoritarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 02:48 AM
1

It's the opposite that's true. The movie "stereotypes" reflect the reality (albeit a caricatured version of it). "It is not vertue, wisdom, valour, wit, Strength, comliness of shape, or amplest merit That woman's love can win or long inherit; But what it is, hard is to say, Harder to hit, (Which way soever men refer it)" This poem was written by Samson Agonistes in 1010ad. Men complaining about women not admiring them for their nice guy qualities is not a product of modernity. Overstating the va…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 06:16 AM
2

Philosophers ruling the country? To paraphrase William F. Buckley "I'd rather be ruled by the first hundred names in the phone book than the Harvard faculty."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 08:08 PM
9

I don't think they want them to die, they just don't care. Compassion is a virtue on the regressive left, unless it comes to being compassionate to lonely white men who are angry about perceived inequity in societal norms, in which case it's all fair game for mockery and contempt ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 02:01 PM
1

Because society shelters you (me, everyone). Just as our actions benefits society, so to do our society benefit us. Self-interest will always be an aspect of any humans life, but understand that none of us would be here if not for people working in the name of that greater good. If the Athenians at marathon had decided that it was easier, on a personal individual level, to avoid the risk of death in battle and just run from the Persians, the entire world as we know it could have been changed (in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 01:54 PM
1

/r/RateMe could help you clarify your own attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:08 AM
1

Well it's may be that people are being nice to you. But maybe it's also that you don't give off a 'looking for boyfriend' vibe. Maybe try and just dress up a bit. If you see a guy you find attractive, hold eye contact with him. Those subconscious signals are very powerful. Just be careful though, men are beasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 09:20 PM
1

It's hard to comment on that because I don't know what you look like. Who calls you pretty? Female friends? Family members? Male friends? I've seen some very 'unsexy' girls (didn't dress feminine, didn't act feminine) still get quite a lot of male attention just based on their looks, however there may be a cultural difference between the UK and wherever you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:59 PM
1

What is your pill? - Rouge. Do you have casual sex on a semi-frequent basis? - No. Most of my relationships have been LTR's. Though I have had sex friends at various points in my life. Have you ever been to a night club? - Yes. Have you ever been drunk before? - Did anyone answer no to this? Have you ever smoked weed or a different illegal drug? - xxx_420_xxx (University, like everyone). What is the shortest amount of time between one you have met someone and when you first slept with them? - ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:45 PM
1

I'd actually agree with this statement, in that I think male incels can do more to potentially become more attractive that female incels. Female incels are more likely to simply be stunningly physically unattractive. Shy, socially awkward, or even batshit insane girls that are beautiful can still attract a lot of male attention. Male incels on the other hand, while they can be stunning ugly too, can at least compensate in other ways. Many male incels are just cripplingly shy, which is an issue w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:24 PM
2

It's much more balanced than 80/20. A fat girl with a pretty face is still unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:20 PM
1

Complicated question. The pill (the birth control pill, not a red/blue one) has led to women joining the workforce and increasing our productivity, but it's also led to a declining birth rate in the west, and the breakdown of traditional gender roles that are not positive. Free sexuality has led to us partnering with people we are more sexually comparable with, but has also led to a more libertine society where people focus more on simply satisfying our appetites rather than a grander commitment…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:17 PM
3

How did you know??!??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/16 11:08 AM
3

Whenever I'd be at a party and people would start talking about Harry Potter I'd always use the same quip, "So, does anyone here like books for adults?" It would pretty much always get a laugh. Backfired on me once however during a trip to visit a friend who was studying at Cambridge (elite university in England) when I made the quip to him and his friends, and they instead jumped into a discussion of Dostoevsky.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 12:39 AM
1

Out of curiosity would you count yourself as one of the 30%?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 11:13 AM
2

That's the low end of the bell curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 11:11 AM
1

High functioning psychopaths likely make up the core of our political and business elite. Having a high IQ and no human sympathy are a powerful combination if you don't let on what a monster you are. See: Bill Clinton.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:56 AM
6

meanwhile zero evidence that women literally just stop maturing at age 18 I know many women in their 20's who love Harry Potter. Check and mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:53 AM
3

Does this mean that, all things taken into account, men's and women's lives are about the same quality, albeit in different ways? Perhaps. It's a hard thing to gauge. I might have been happier if I had been born as a woman, but what I like about being male is being able to take the lead in relationships and sex - even if that doesn't exactly make me 'happy' per se. Of course valuing such assertiveness is a very male characteristic. If I had been born female would I care about that? And so the ci…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:49 AM
3

Ooh this is fascinating. Yes, it's true breast size has little correlation with the amount of milk a woman can produce. It's actually an evolutionary trick that women play on men that we never cottoned on to! Back in our early evolution men sexually selected for women with larger mammary glands because they were more likely to successfully nurse a child to health. However women "cheated" this by developing the ability to store fat very effectively in their bodies, 'faking' large glands. However …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:20 PM
5

Also dietary shifts. Large breasts only became vogue in Japan after the introduction of westernized foods (meat, dairy). Before then most Japanese women simply weren't getting the fat intake to support curvier figures (the Japanese diet is traditionally rice and fish, even today it's the slimmest country in the first world).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:11 PM
1

It would be dependent on other factors. The key difference between female lions and humans is the amount of time their young need nursing for. Lions stop nursing after about six to seven months, and are semi-effective hunters after about two years. Obviously human children require far longer to take care of (though that slow development is crucial to out cognitive ability), which would have limited a woman's ability to take part in hunting. It's also not entirely true to say that male lions don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 03:45 PM
1

Funny. I'd argue that the march of technology has to a large extend masked the decline of our civilization. We fool ourselves into thinking our culture and politics are correct because every generation we get richer. Even as many of the core pillars of society (the family unit, shared morality, personal responsibility) collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 02:38 PM
2

Name of a society that presided over a complete collapse of the traditional family unit and still managed to survive? Name a society that invested billions of dollars a year in upholding the most disruptive, unproductive and criminal behavior patterns in it's people and survived? When great Empires fall (and they do) it's usually via suicide, not murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 02:36 PM
1

It massively increases the odds that your kids aren't going to grow up to be broken, fucked up individuals. See: Mormons - Delusional. Easy to make fun of. Happier/wealthier than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 02:33 PM
1

Nothing about out society is progressive. We mask our own decline with the advancement of technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 02:27 PM
1

Do you think women and men are equally likely to have dark fantasies? My experience with GF's is that if they have any kinks at all it's usually light BDSM or roleplay. Of course I support if they had really crazy kinks maybe they wouldn't have told me...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 09:29 PM
1

I never said self interest is immoral, it isn't. But it most certainly can be when it's at the expense of others as a lot of the wash that spills out of TRP is. Ughhh. Most self-interest comes at the expense of others. If I am dating a pretty woman, she can't be also dating you. If I get the good job opportunity, you can't also have the same job. I'd agree that self-interest can go too far - when it's damaging to the collective i.e. selling out your country, dumping toxic waste in a public water…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 05:46 PM
1

if you have to eschew 'conventional wisdom' and act as TRP suggests in order to be successful, I'd argue that you're finding that success at the expense of morality. Self-interest is not immoral. Despite the fact that they're more often than not the butt of jokes, what is wrong with the SJW outlook? It's not based on reality. There aren't more male CEO's because women are oppressed, there are more male CEO's because men are better leaders and harder workers. It's not really accurate to say that …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 02:26 PM
1

She was a protester (one of many) who attempted to interrupt Milo Yiannopoulos (the fantastic gay conservative) at one of the speeches he gave on a university campus. She got internet famous for the sheer ridiculousness of.... everything about her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHKmYCCX4_w Abandon hope all ye who enter here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 01:14 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeAnarchy/comments/4gt7k2/trigglypuffs_okcupid_profile_reads_like_a_parody/ Edit: take a shot every time she refers to herself as a 'fat babe'.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 12:56 AM
1

Come on man. Foot fetishism is a big thing too, but I doubt the number of men that have that fetish is anywhere close to 1% of all men. Most men like a certain hip/waste ratio. Slimmer is generally better unless you have a very naturally voluptuous body type.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 12:07 AM
2

Honestly, sometimes it feels like this entire sub is just an essay on semantics. Hah. I feel you. If you look at public faces of the fat acceptance movement, many are married or dating. True. I was actually thinking about 'Trigglypuff' (I'm sure you've heard of her) when I wrote that. Her OKcupid profile makes for fascinating reading - clearly desperate for a boyfriend even while superficially celebrating her size.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/16 12:00 AM
3

Ehhh, isn't this just a semantic issue? Most incels could probably get laid if they were willing to sleep with the super drunk, super fat girl at a bar. When we talk incel I assume a bare minimum of standards for both men and women. Maybe we're talking at cross purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 11:50 PM
5

fat women have sex all the time If they have very low standards yes. I'd sure there's a lot of fat women who haven't had sex for a good long time. Fat acceptance is about being treated as human beings in the public eye. No. It's about redefining beauty/societal standards for the lazy. Don't find me attractive = discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 11:46 PM
4

Isn't the fat acceptance movement just the collective voice of female incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 11:38 PM
6

There's nothing really 'neo' about 'neomasculinity'. It's what masculinity used to be before women began to define what that meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 10:56 PM
1

No, not necessarily. If you can live a successful life buying into a lot of the crap that makes up conventional wisdom then good for you. I'd say that a lot of silicone valley is SJW as hell, but still obviously successful. It's just as times get harder the ability to deny reality becomes more and more of a liability. Look at the complete non-existence of a left-wing in Israel. Nothing like 30 years of constant rocket attacks to cleanse you of left wing delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 10:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter