TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AdHistorical3313 Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by AdHistorical3313 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

If you think women are 'inherently loyal' despite how they trigger something like three quarters of divorces you are high. Also, porn isn't about loyalty because a lot of couples watch porn yet still stay in their relationships. Men happen to be more visual whereas women tend to be more mental - that's not a correlation to their loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:25 AM
4

Honestly, the more I age and hence mature, the more I realise that I don't need a woman, not even in a strictly objective and absolutist 'I can technically survive by myself' sort of way - I mean: even emotionally, the novelty of a relationship quickly wears off. Men can't rely on women emotionally like women rely on men emotionally; that relationship is basically a one way street at least for the most part. Men also aren't financial beneficiaries of relationships with the opposite sex. If they …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 11:47 PM
2

Good morals and values - doesn't stop me from trusting and respecting them Has similar interests to me - gives us some avenues for bonding At least somewhat equal to me in the looks department - I'm not that fussy about looks if the personality is good You might think these things are quite reasonable, but here's the thing: they're 100% firm and unnegotiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:26 AM
1

What if the woman in this scenario is just...lazy. What if she even admits 'yeah this is because the idea of working sucks and I love how my husband is happy to do it instead'? You realise, again, that's actually quite a reasonable mindset for a human being ruled by incentives and hedonic temptations...? You consider most women so saintly that they're beyond such flaws and incentives? Why do you assume most women are these worker droids that just adore the concept of having to go out there and b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 11:11 PM
0

It's not a sacrifice if you love doing it It's not a sacrifice if it has clear benefits to your life It's not a sacrifice if you're statistically happier for it Also: you realise alimony isn't child support, right? Alimony isn't anything to do with children. Alimony is spousal support, not child support. So you're implying that wives that don't have any children shouldn't have alimony...? What about (a) no children and (b) insists on not working, despite what the husband thinks?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 11:00 PM
-3

Are you still happy saying this if it is the woman who divorces the man though Is it ever something the woman will need to take accountability for, ultimately? i.e. if she is the one causing the situation, potentially unreasonably?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:24 PM
-3

...Do you realise that a lot of people in this world consider not having to work a privilege though? Like, a massive one Don't speak in bad faith. We both know the world enough. If anything you should try the angle of 'ohh but being a mother is a hard job - that's why she should get the money' - don't try and contort the idea of not having to worry about work as an inconvenience. Don't trifle this. Fs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:14 PM
0

...Are we talking about the specific and non-general case of the wives whom (a) insist on not working and staying at home full time, whether they do or do not have children, and (b) claim for alimony after (probably*:) they*, divorce their husband? I'm not applying a statement generally to 'every stay at home mom' I'm applying it where alimony is relevant, and where the women happened to stay at home. AKA: during the situation of divorce, and then some. Not the situation of a woman staying merel…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 07:31 PM
-6

And the idea of alimony hinges on 'I missed out on the utter privilege of having to wake up early each weekday morning and work for 8 hours or so, for all those years - I deserve compensation for my lack of discomfort!', even though during said marriage it's not for them to do that when their husbands do this as a duty and a service of the house for them, and she'll be damned if he doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 07:20 PM
7

Dating in this generation is this bullshit 'non-chalant olympics' and a competition about who cares the least about the other/who can show the least interest. It makes everything not only duller but it masks true intent and makes everything human cryptography. It's also the 'job interview' vibe of dating these days. People need to drop their guards and actually be real. Dating apps really need to be dropped at large because their effects are making both men and women miserable. The only thing I …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 02:35 PM
5

I don't agree that men do very much directly for sex. Men do most of what they do, outside of survival, for respect, value, honour etc - grades, uni degrees, jobs, status, money etc it's all just a symbol of and for respect, honour and value. Sex is a very powerful proxy for respect and value, ain't it. Women don't have the same proxy as men do in sex because for women sex isn't an obstacle or a gesture of respect from men because you don't need to earn a man's respect to get sex whereas men nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:12 PM
–

From what I see: men don't get attracted to 'values' - it would be great if we did, but nope, we're kind of dumb apes like that - not all, but a lot. Women also don't necessarily get attracted to 'values' that much, but if he's tall, if he's strong, if he's rich etc then she will perceive of a whole load of things as 'good values', and least to a large extent. He's a criminal? No he isn't, he's 'ambitious and a risk-taker'. He's kind? Oh that's not weakness, that's 'being a provider' etc. Yeah s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:39 PM
2

I think there is some truth to there being asymmetrical effects in the phenomenon of one night stands within the genders and I think people that consider this 'just a cultural stereotype' are pretty naive and probably have quite limited experiences of how men and women behave and act in these contexts. In fact, another user in here was saying simulaneously that women that have had more sexual partners (a) divorce significantly more, and (b) it is not related to their compromised ability to pair …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 12:00 PM
1

Can you stop replying? This is pointless
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:51 AM
1

I don't think you're getting much out of this conversation, funnily enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:39 AM
1

Buddy why are we getting granual about the logistics of meeting women when you're telling yourself there's no point in it? It doesn't matter if it's a dating app vs real life in this case, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:37 AM
1

The same way anybody meets anybody
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:34 AM
3

I agree; Men's threshold is more essential yet is lower Women's threshold is less essential yet is higher
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:34 AM
1

I've well and truly never seen anything even approaching this - if anything it is the other way around: I've seen and heard of women throwing their male partners under the bus in favour of a male friend/friends
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:11 AM
3

Wow, such low effort trolling - boring
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:14 PM
3

What, are you saying that just by being red pill rather than blue pill that makes a person inherently undatable or something? Because that's pretty stupid. If anything: why waste your time trying to cause an argument like you clearly are? Being the kind of person that likes to argue is probably not going to help you with dating too, ironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:48 PM
1

I just think people need to stop using the apps - trying to regulate apps to a large extent is going to be like trying to fix an inherently broken system. The very nature of making human beings like a meat market (like it generally is on dating apps) is going to be prone to deeply unwelcomed cultural effects even if you regulate it to an extent that a lot of people think is more agreeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:19 PM
1

Yes, especially if it is in the context of the lack of smile being unwelcome remarks too Being instructed and ordered to smile is a bit of a paradox too; why would you need to tell somebody who's happy to smile if smiling happens when you are happy? If you're not making somebody happy, telling them 'smile' is like telling a woman to moan in bed instead of making it happen naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:02 PM
1

I don't think it's being claimed that feminism is literally stopping each and every woman from having children, or to be clearer on this: stopping any woman that works a job that they work long hours in and take seriously But: 'Even high status men' yeah, funny that you say that. Almost as though women are attracted to distinctly unequal partners to themselves, Almost like it's fundamentally not feminist. You've plucked three celebrity women that might be a massive exception to what otherwise is…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:30 PM
1

Whom* Men in relationships are still expected to pay for women in ways women aren't expected to pay for men, i.e. dates, valentines day, holidays, a lot of the time it's bills too. Men are still expected to protect women and put them before themselves, whereas the opposite isn't true. Men also are expected to be the rock in the relationship i.e. women can break down and cry in times of vulnerability but men aren't culturally emboldened to do this in relationships even if it is within marriage. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 05:46 PM
3

Men today are upset because they have all (or at least 'most of) the responsibility (like they used to) yet none of the authority (like they used to) - you surely can't expect human beings to not adapt to changes in their circumstances and their environments...? Incentives govern human beings with totality - if you can't perusade them with incentives to do something and you have to rely on 'cultural norms' that's just not enough of an incentive for a lot of men now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 05:17 PM
3

And before anyone says that their grandparents stayed married for 60 years, it doesn't mean shit. My colleague was telling me how her elderly parents have been married for 60 years, but they sleep in separate rooms, they live in separate areas of the house, and they can't stand each other. I'm sorry but do you understand the difference between this anecdote and something like national studies? What do you think national statistics suggest about how happy or stable previous generations' couples a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:59 PM
6

You're one person though - you aren't necessarily representative of a consensus on this
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 02:45 AM
5

Sorry let me be clear on that - by 2/10 I mean 2/10 face and body (body not meaning height)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 01:47 AM
1

>Is it 'hypergamous' to not ask other women out? >Are women actually offended by this scenario to begin with?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 01:40 AM
-4

I don't have a problem with the concept of higher education, especially when it's not attached to a life time of debt. What I do have a problem with is either men or women being raised like they are these days to consider higher education the only way. And it's more tragic when women think this way as well because they ought to consider themselves pretty lucky to have more options than this; as a woman you can not work and depend on your partner and it'll be socially acceptable. It's not true in…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 01:32 AM
22

Both are shallow, sure...But you've gotta admit: men are much easier to please, and will ultimately be economical and realistic about their preferences and decisions compared with most women. This isn't even really a controversial talking point; in most of biology it's the female that's the selector, and the selector is the 'choosy' sex. There's a reason most divorces are done by women, even though, let's be real, the same kinds of problems that will trigger that sort of decision in a woman woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 01:01 AM
2

It's not a strawman because I'm not painting your whole, original post in this way - I'm saying, in isolation, that the idea of there being a makeup taboo existing 'silently and in the shadows' is bollocks - you used that description for it in the context of me saying what I said towards that very first message - it's bullshit to imply that there's a makeup taboo (using it, rather than not, which I'd actually understand) when there just quite frankly isn't. Saying 'Just because you don't hear it…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:20 AM
1

That's a cope if ever there was one Slut-shaming? Sure Pressure on women to shave ther armpits and pubic hair? Sure Even a slight pressure against fat women? Sure A stigma against makeup? Nahhh, that's a stretch.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:08 AM
7

'Everyone gets judged for it' do they though...? I don't think I've really heard of a taboo or stigma against makeup and hair extensions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:36 PM
24

You know, by comparing people that're bisexual, or previously bisexual, to elderly people, you're really proving my point. Elderly people are a negative in a romantic context for young people for probably pretty understandable rationale. What exactly would be understandable about writing off any man who's had any kind of bisexuality in his past? I doubt you'll be able to give me something reasoned rather than emotional - and that's my pure point - whatever reasoning or emotions you'll be able to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:53 AM
35

My message was that it is ironic that the two positions can coexist at the same time in the same brain, i.e. gay people deserve understanding, recognition, equal respect etc, but at the same time there's also something negative about them that disqualifies them for a dignified relationship with a woman, and at least from my own experience it is most certainly not a rational conclusion but 110% a deeply emotional one. In fact, women in this way tend to be more homophobic, in this context, than me…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:53 PM
23

I don't disagree with that first sentence but you've gotta admit it's quite unfair to write off a man for it, unless one's image of even bisexuality, let alone homosexuality, is negative. It's also the irony of it because being really pro-LGBT is surely to signal that being that very thing isn't an issue or a negative thing even in the context of a relationship because why would it be, exactly? Unless she's quite religious, and even then, why would religion only count at the eact moment of a rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:42 PM
2

Okay well thank you for your feedback
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:28 PM
2

I think women probably have a better intuition for subtle non-verbal cues than men, but that's where the advantage ends as they're worse at most things in a social lens i.e. worse mediators, worse negotiators, less mature when it comes to relationships in general i.e. gossiping, name-calling, screaming and crying if it doesn't go their way (not every woman but significantly more women than men), etc. Men tend to work in teams better than women too. Women also don't tend to be great communicators…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 06:07 PM
64

True. But it isn't just this. Women are the most enthusiastically pro-LGBT rights/recognition but if a man says he's bisexual or admits he's been with another man, ohhhhhh boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:47 PM
2

I won't speak for men, but I'll speak for myself - this was 100% true in my 20s; one night stands/sex at all was purely to stroke my ego and deep down I didn't really give a fuck about the act itself when masturbation existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 03:43 PM
0

I don't even know where to start with this. Men used their authority to protect and defend women... even though they also used it to control, manipulate, rape and physical abuse women? And this is the natural order of things, the right and proper way, because men just had so much on their plate? How could any sane person look back at the way women were treated through history and not see that as domestic slavery? You speak as though women would have absolutely no incentive or rationale to co-exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 03:01 PM
0

I'm just pointing out that it might not be accurate to say that the rates of pairing seen throughout history were natural and that our society is the unnatural one. They were very much pairing out of necessity and all the evidence points to this. Therefore, in a society where it is not necessary, how could we ever expect for pairing rates to remain the same? If it really was natural for men and women to pair together neatly en masse then it would be happening regardless of policy decisions, rega…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:49 PM
1

Is something really 'natural' if it can be abandoned within the space of a generation or two? If something is truly a natural inclination, you usually can't socially engineer your way around it very easily. 'A lack of', not 'none at all' - I'm not saying men and women aren't coming together at all now - it's just significantly less (significantly not being synonymous with 'massively') - if men and women are becoming more socially androgynous in the current climate and not showing very clear gend…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:36 PM
-1

As an individual with no preconceived cultural role, sure. As a female/woman as a member of that group, having this right basically renders a relationship with a male/man a lot more superfluous; as an individual it isn't as convenient, but as a species it means a lack of natural gravity between men and women and their relationships, codependencies, child rearing etc; if you can just work to make an individual income you become equal with most men, but one of the crucial things women find attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter