TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Adam_Alpha Archive

View 9 posts and 114 comments by Adam_Alpha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So does this study control for those personal choices? I haven't had a chance to read it yet, it was passed to me by a friend who claims that the study confirms that for same job, same responsibilities, when get paid less simply for being women.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:41 PM
6

BAH GAWD, THE LION TAMER!!! HE'LL BREAK THOSE LEGS IN HALF, KING!!!!
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:34 PM
8

Oh man. One of Clymer's first points was to bring up the SPLC declaring us a hate group. This is going to be a massacre.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:43 AM
1

Can't wait. This is gonna be good.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:02 AM
0

as no one has been here that long. How do you mean?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:36 PM
3

This is like 1% male issue, 99% black issue.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:29 PM
14

Direct quote from the opposition, Maureen Dowd: “So now that women don’t need men to reproduce and refinance, the question is, will we keep you around? And the answer is, ‘You know we need you in the way we need ice cream — you’ll be more ornamental.’ ” I feel sick.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:26 PM
1

Amen, Reverend.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:09 AM
1

Guise, haven't you learned yet that facts don't real? Only patriarchy real, gnome saiyan?
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:14 AM
27

Yeah, but if we replaced MRA with feminists and replace supremacist with radfems, every single one of us would be calling no true Scotsman. "Those aren't feminists those are radfems. They may say they're feminists, but they really aren't."
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:20 PM
2

Ehhhhhhh...
/r/MensRights16/10/13 10:30 PM
4

This is exactly what I was looking for. Excellent point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:55 PM
4

How would you respond to a feminist saying that the shift in attitudes is because of Feminism spreading awareness of men's issues? I've come across a few who truly believe this.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:14 PM
3

Because women are actually stupid children that need to be protected and robbed of any agency and responsibility. Empowerment! /s
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:59 PM
1

Seriously? Interesting. Can I bother you for a source?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:06 PM
40

It seems that you are slowly realizing what many of us MRAs already know: reddit and its mods/admins are FAAARRR from fair and unbiased. It's all "freedom of speech and expression and no censoring" until it's something that shows actual equality being practiced and not feminism's idea of equality™.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:02 PM
2

So, by saying this, I assume you are literally the only person on the planet that actually has reliable rape statistics that you base this statement off of? Care to share these figures with the rest of us?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:03 PM
9

Yeah, but the 10 or so unique cases we see every week on this sub might cast some doubt on that stat, right? No? Sorry, my bad.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:39 PM
17

But this almost never happens, right guys!? Less than 1%, right!? ^<sup>Guys?</sup> ^^<sup>Guys?</sup>
/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:03 PM
9

HOMOPHOBE—Someone with a distaste for sex that involves feces and AIDS. Wow, that's a pretty fucked up thing to say. What a prick.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:41 PM
1

By telling him to 'man up'? What exactly do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:09 AM
3

Isn't telling a guy to 'man up' exactly the kind of thing our movement is trying to discourage people from doing?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 08:32 PM
0

Am I the only one who doesn't think that it is a good thing that this was posted on TGMP? I have no issues with seeing this as feminists appropriating MRA issues so they can be taken more seriously when they say "SEE! FEMINISM IS TOTALLY TAKING CARE OF YOUR MAN PROBLEMS! YOU GUYS CAN STOP NOW! WE GOT THIS!"
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:00 AM
8

Well, considering any sex initiated by a male is rape, I ain't mad at it. /s
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:00 PM
1

I wasn't able to find anything that specifically addresses forced envelopment. Is it covered in the updated definition?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:57 PM
1

They revised it? That's great! Source?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:44 PM
1

Some of the comments on the article are absolutely sickening. I need a break from this stuff. It's making me an angry person.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:22 PM
2

Come on, man. I get that this kind of thing sort of reinforces how it's a bit silly to have women and men professionally playing American football together, but we don't need to revel in her failure. That's just low.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:09 AM
1

WTF at the tabs and search bar....!
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:15 PM
3

Commenting to save. Excellent points.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:57 PM
0

In other news, water is wet and Chris Brown is an asshole.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:29 PM
2

lol wut?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:28 AM
6

I know for a fact Care to link to the study that surveyed all 4,000,000,000 women on planet earth? I assume you have one, since you KNOW for a fact.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:10 PM
18

Because men are objectively better than women at EVERY SINGLE physical activity in the entire fucking world. That is not up for debate. That is an obvious, demonstrable fact of life. It doesn't have to be sexist or a gender issue. Men are stronger and faster than women. If you argue this, you are a fool. It's widely accepted that a really good high school male basketball team would destroy every single WNBA team easily. The lowest ranked male Olympic swimmer swims faster than the top ranked fema…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:18 AM
2

What problems are you referring to?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:52 AM
4

You can be pro women and men. It's called being an egalitarian. Feminism by its very name focuses only one genders rights. Now, the MRA does as well, the difference being the MRA wants to put men on the level women are already at, or bring women to the same level as men. Either way you have equality. Feminists want to make sure this does bot happen and they fight against it constantly. You simply can't be a feminist and an MRA. They furiously oppose one another. The MRM is striving for an egalit…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:41 AM
6

Ok, I'm going to seem a bit hostile here, so apologies in advance, but it doesn't fucking matter what you BELIEVE feminism to be about. It doesn't fucking matter what you THINK feminism's stated purpose is. Feminism's stated purpose has already been established. It was established a long time ago. No matter how many times you say otherwise, you DON'T get to apply your own meaning to feminism. You can't replace it's leaders with people who hold true feminist values, because people with true femin…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:25 AM
4

It would no longer be feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:18 AM
7

I know several feminists personally who are for men's rights. They aren't feminists. They may use that title, but they have no idea what the tenets of feminism are. Feminist leaders that have even brought up the idea that men may have issues have been excommunicated. Just look up Christina Hoff Sommers. Remember that THIS is what happens when you bring up men's rights with real feminist leaders. Also I never said I was a feminist just that I don't want to fight against feminist goals. Feminist g…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:17 AM
3

Absolutely! And there you have feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:12 AM
5

I disagree. You seem to want to be a part of a movement that strives for gender equality, right? I don't know how many times you need to be told and shown, but that movement is not feminism. You can preach all day about how feminists just want equality among the sexes, but the leaders (leaders being the feminists that head feminist organizations like N.O.W. and push laws through congress benefiting only women) of the movement you yourself identify with believe the exact opposite. They are the on…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:08 AM
2

But does that mean that feminism is inherently wrong? Yes. Anything that is against something no one has any control over is wrong. The problem here isn't feminism it's hypocrisy. How so?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:59 PM
7

You do know that men are raped FAR more often than women right? And a hefty percentage of those rapes are a woman raping a man. You've been taught to believe that a woman can't rape a man, and this is untrue. It happens all the time. If you think there is an issue with women not reporting rape out of shame, imagine how few men report being raped by a woman. How many times do you think they would get laughed at before getting some actual help? But still why would feminists need to blame women for…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:55 PM
8

lol what? If something was inherently anti-black or anti-hispanic would you consider it to be wrong? Of course it's wrong to be anti-male. It's wrong to be anti anything based on predetermined traits that no one has control over.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:35 PM
7

That's understandable. I think someone said it to you elsewhere in the thread, but you need to stop looking at what "feminists" say on message boards and look at what actual feminists accomplish in the tangible world. So much of it is inherently anti-men.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:22 PM
2

Don't want to sound like a dick, but your understanding of feminism is demonstrably wrong, as has been shown to you throughout this entire thread. I suggest doing some research into feminism beyond what NAFALT's tell you the movement is about. Because this is very important: so called "liberal feminists" like yourself who believe they are fighting for the equality of oppressed women are unimportant as far as feminism goes. Only the feminists that have power to move legislation through and block …
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:11 PM
4

Only Feminist leaders actually DO undermine equality for men by pushing through legislation that benefits females only, blocking universities from building Men's Centers, advocating universities blocking entrance to Men's Rights seminars, and scores of other things. On the other hand, MRA's simply want men and women to have the EXACT same rights, responsibilities and privileges from a legal, economic, and societal perspective.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:03 PM
19

.......so not feminism?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:54 PM
28

This is disgusting. My heart goes out to the guys. I keep trying to find all this privilege my gender benefits from just by being men. I haven't turned up much. :/
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:47 PM
2

Enlighten us.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:56 AM
1

Maybe it said so in the article (I'm really tired and didn't register all of it), but why exactly are women overtaking men in STEM? It's definitely not because they're better students, so what exactly is causing it?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:48 AM
1

Holy shit did you read some of the comments on that? "Don't Be That Guy posters lowered sexual assaults by 10% last year!" I would be so very curious to know how they got these numbers. Did a bunch of guys walk into the police station saying, "You know officer, I was going to go rape this lady, but then I saw those posters that reminded me that rape is bad. If it weren't for the posters, my dick would literally be in her right now. Thanks Edmonton!" Get fucking real.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:37 AM
3

That's because today a man threatening to kill a woman who cheated on him makes him a dangerous, misogynistic psycho, while a woman threatening to kill a man that cheated on her makes her an empowered woman just standing up for herself.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:10 AM
8

In the interest of fairness, country and blues music have never really had a problem with songs about men taking revenge on women. Take this video by Toby Keith for example. Even though it ends up being a humorously failed endeavor, in the video he is in the process of trapping a woman who hurt him in his basement, and likely leaving her to rot. I've heard many blues songs, especially old blues, that deal with a man literally killing the woman and her guy after being cheated on. It's actually re…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:04 AM
1

And by raped I mean "complimented by someone you don't find attractive."
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:37 AM
2

But......but......being a mom........is hardest........um.........DAE Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:36 AM
3

women SHOULD face the same punishments as men Feminists actively lobby against this. I'm not convinced you are a feminist. gender should have no role in the consequences. Now I am certain you aren't a feminist. No. I am a feminist. No. You most certainly are not. Please do not take this as condescension, but I highly recommend you do more research into the tenets of the ideology you identify with. Feminism is not, and arguably has NEVER been, about gender equality. Edit: words and stuff
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:04 AM
4

And why is that, exactly?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:52 AM
2

And here I was thinking that this whole patriarchy thing was supposed to FAVOR me and my gender. Damn shame.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:15 AM
1

I'm not convinced she's not just a giant troll.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:13 AM
7

Hey wait a second, I thought men did all that stu-Ohhhhhhhh...
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:49 AM
12

Man, for only 1-2% of rape charges being false (according to feminists), I sure have been seeing these A LOT lately.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:55 PM
1

I'm not trying to ignore it, it's just that when it comes to legal rights, feelings and emotions shouldn't be taken into account. Only equality.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:38 PM
2

Abortion is illegal where you live? I'm sorry to hear that. Well, the next logical place to take this discussion would be to adoption. A woman can legally give her child away AFTER its born, having yet another way out of parenthood. Once again, a man has no such right.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:23 PM
7

No no no no. As humans that have the brain capacity to rise above our animal instincts, we have the ability to separate sex from procreation. The fact that birth control and condoms exists are evidence of this.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:16 PM
4

Ok, fair enough. Yes, he CAN walk away, but it is not LEGAL for him to do so. He will be a criminal if he does. It is legal for the woman to opt out of parenthood, while it is not for men. It is inequality at at finest. The MRM is concerned with legal rights of men, or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:10 PM
4

Fair enough. Yes, she had the right to abort it because its in her body, which is fine. But let's look at what that means: she is aborting the child for what reason? Simple: to not be a parent. In the interest of equality, men should have the option to simply opt out of parenthood before the kid is born, exactly as the woman does. Why would anyone in their right mind have an issue with this?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:07 PM
-4

Fair enough. However, I feel that intelligent discussion left the building when OP posted what he did. Call me an ass, but I truly found what he said to be typical feminist bile. I wasn't attacking him, merely what he posted. Now down below, where I call him a dolt, that was meant to attack him.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:02 PM
30

If the man chose to leave the kid before it was born, simply exercising the same reproductive rights as the woman, he is STILL considered a deadbeat dad. Not apples to oranges at all.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:56 PM
3

Yes, absolutely. How it would be done is anyone's guess, but yes they should have the right.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:54 PM
1

The man can literally just walk away? What fucking fantasy land do you live in? I'd really like to move there.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:52 PM
11

The whole 'women bear the child so they should have more rights' holds no water whatsoever. I personally don't give two fucks about the fact that the woman had to bring the kid to term for 9 months when compared to the 20+ years the male is expected to be the primary supporter of the kid in western society.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:47 PM
8

*men should be held accountable for their actions. FTFY
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:37 PM
12

As a result of HIS actions? Last time I checked it takes two to tango, you fucking dolt. Take this shit back to SRS.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:32 PM
17

So let me get this straight: let's say that the man learns the woman is pregnant, and from that very moment, declares that he does not want the child AT ALL. You're telling me that at that point, even though the mom has the option to opt out of parenthood, the dad should absolutely not have the right? Gotcha. Typical feminist bile.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:19 PM
-1

Shut the fuck up, idiot.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:38 AM
2

Ok, now I know you're trolling. Thanks for giving me a good reason to not engage you. Appreciate it.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 12:07 AM
2

Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:53 PM
2

Your entire movement has proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:42 PM
0

You make a good point. I do, however, think it's unfair to assume that just because feminism ended up that way, that MRM will also. There is really no way to predict that. These points are all moot, however, as this as all idealization. The sad reality of the matter is that all signs point to gender movements being around far into the future.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:40 PM
1

Incorrect. Simply giving men the SAME rights American women already have (which is what the american MRM wants) would create balance. Equality. Nothing more. And once that point is reached, then and only then can we start making decisions regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:16 PM
-1

I disagree that we are not an egalitarian movement. At least as far as my country (USA) goes, the MRM strives for nothing more than equality in a country where they have been made disposable, second class citizens. Yes, we advocate for one side, but that's because the other side quite literally already has what we want. I understand that a lot of feminists could use this same argument, but the difference is that our oppression (couldn't think of a better word, sorry) is objectively, demonstrably…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:55 PM
-3

I think Lanza apologists are just the look this movement needs. /s
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:00 PM
2

In my opinion, it would have to cease to exist. Feminism is no longer something that is at all necessary. It's well known around these parts that women have transcended from equality into superiority in our society. I believe that feminism needs to be gone, and for a truly egalitarian movement like ours to move up men to the point of EQUALITY in all aspects of life: same opportunities, same rights, same punishments. True equality. This can't happen while a feminist movement still has power.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:05 PM
12

In the interest of fairness, this reads like the ramblings of one crazy feminist. This is crazy even by modern feminist standards, and probably shouldn't be viewed as a true feminist ideal.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:39 PM
7

My stomach literally wretched at some of those. However, feminists resorting to minimizing our movement, instead of engaging in thoughtful, intellectual debate makes me strangely optimistic of our future.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:50 PM
1

Commenting to read later
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:12 PM
-1

Ummmm afraid not, pumpkin. Being of benefit to men is not the same as not being of benefit to men. I want to avoid ad hominems, but I could drive a Mack truck through the holes in your argument's logic.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:11 PM
-2

This law has no direct bearing on men You LITERALLY defeated yourself in your own response. Bravo. slow clap.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:01 PM
1

no, sir. Just opinions.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:19 AM
1

Oh no no no no I wasn't going for humor. Just wanted to know if people thought she should have expected that or not. Because I am not sure what to think.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:15 AM
12

You have to understand that Nice Guy now has a negative stigma attached to it. I would stop using it, especially on dating sites. The way of the world, unfortunately. Also, I recommend losing the whole "They only date alpha male assholes" attitude, as it is exactly the kind of thing that created the "Nice Guy" stigma. When stated the way you stated it, it implies that a woman should choose you for no other reason than you are a nice guy who is not an asshole, as if a woman should desire no other…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:48 AM
8

Abuse might be taking it a bit far, but I assume you are familiar with "nice guy syndrome"? This is what they are referring to. And these dudes, assuming they fit the definition of "nice guy syndrome", are indeed total assholes.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:56 AM
1

Dude, come on. This kind of stuff backpedals the movement.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:47 AM
0

It's okay. I would probably totally ignore my request for you to back up your argument as well. Them's the breaks, I guess.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:17 AM
0

I'm sorry, you seem to have misspelled "I am not interested in debating someone who knows what the fuck they are talking about, due to the fact that my stances rely on male ignorance." FTFY :)
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:04 AM
3

No, I would not agree. Please inform me of a time in the last 20 fucking years when a piece of legislation was passed that was of benefit to ONLY men and detrimental against women. Give me one fucking instance. I will wait all night if necessary. I can list like 30 that accomplished just this, but with preference to women. Let's see who runs out first.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:58 AM
1

*Superiority. FTFY.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:48 AM
5

Let me break this down for you: it doesn't. fucking. matter. what non-radical/non-extremist feminists think. At all. Would you like to know why? Because it's the extremist, female gender SUPERIOR ones who get shit done. It's they who make the government push legislation through that blatantly discriminates against men and gives superior, preferential treatment to women. It's they who block campuses from setting up men's help centers under the guise that men don't fucking need help ever. You and …
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:40 AM
3

Fair enough, man. But stuff like this end up on SRS. It doesn't take too far of a stretch of the mind to see this as defending middle eastern men.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:28 AM
4

I seriously appreciate your answer, but you seriously got some huge balls even implying that it's the men in the middle east that have it tough.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:24 AM
2

Feminism balancing the playing field If that was all that the feminist movement wanted they would have disbanded years ago, having achieved their goal. But, as everyone in the MRM knows, it isn't fucking about equality anymore. What an ignorant statement.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:21 AM
6

Indeed. I should not have fed the troll. Silly me. Thank you for giving me a legitimate answer :)
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:06 AM
-3

Seriously? I ask a serious question and you troll? And you idiot feminists wonder why no one respects you anymore. smh
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:52 AM
2

And ridiculously hilarious! If you haven't yet, check out their other stuff. Great channel.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:28 AM
1

A choice quote from the comment section: Quit picking women up in a bar, you were a marine, and you know what can happen. Whelp, there goes my good mood.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:31 AM
8

I didn't think there was a stereotype that only men abused their children, was there? Maybe it's just me. I seem to recall mostly cases of the mom doing the abusing. Again, maybe it's just selective memory.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:59 AM
6

HEY! HIM FLAUNTING THAT HUGE SNAKE GAVE YOU NO RIGHT TO ACKNOWLEDGE SAID HUGE SNAKE, YOU FUCKING MISOGYNISTIC HOMOPHOBIC PIG FUCKER FCUKING FUCUCUCKK!!!!1!1 I'LL CUT UR FUCKING DICK OFFFFFFF!!!!
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:24 AM
5

Sweet strawman, bro. Nowhere did I say that female fashion is sex sex sex. I referenced one article of female clothing (low cut shirts) and the purpose that one article of clothing serves (the showing off of breasts), not the entirety of female fashion. Try and keep up, ok pumpkin?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:18 AM
10

At least for me. And I know quite a few other girls who share the same opinion. Your opinion has no effect on reality. Do you honestly think that the designers of these shirts are sitting in a big room saying, "We should make these tops low cut, but not because it's sexy, but because it will be more comfortable for Splinter1591's tits."? Face it. These shirts are designed with one purpose in mind: To attract those who are attracted to women, whether it be males or females.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:56 AM
14

*It's, *staring, *crotch, *all, *you. For the love of all things nice, please go back to school. But to answer your question, khakis were not designed to show off a man's bulge. Low cut tops are EXPRESSLY designed to show off a woman's breasts. Also, the lady flat out said "I like to show off cleavage". She is doing it intentionally and yet she gets offended when men look at her breasts. Her showing cleavage is not an invite for a man to touch her, hit on her, or even talk to her, but when someo…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:33 AM
1

Don't you think that's an unfair generalization? No. Here's why: The NAFALT! people are entirely irrelevant(as far as their views on feminism are concerned). It isn't NAFALTs who block attempts to open Men's Rights centers. It isn't NAFALTs who have the power to influence the Obama administration to pass countless laws that favor women while blatantly discriminating against men. That power lies with the types of feminists in this video. They are the only members of the movement that matter, as t…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:09 AM
30

Just because I like to show cleavage, it is not an invite to stare at me. Then why in the fucking fuck fuck fucking fuck would you intentionally show off cleavage!? Is it not to draw attention to said cleavage? God dammit it's so hard to take you idiots seriously.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:22 AM
4

Dammit I live in Coeur d' Alene. This is not a good look :/
/r/MensRights30/11/12 10:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter