TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Admirable-Falcon9995 Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by Admirable-Falcon9995 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I stand by my statement, and the implications.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 05:29 AM
0

I don't believe you understood my comment.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:36 AM
1

I'm not all that familiar with it tbh, but I assume a large portion of conservatives are religious in India and would push for gender neutral law here, religious conservatives tend to want to regulate what goes down in people's bedrooms. That's a feature of non theologian religious fanatics across the globe.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:24 AM
17

India is a 3rd World country for a reason. They're on and off the fence on this issue. But as of 2018 it was decriminalized, with sporadic resistance, and an attempt to recriminalize it in 2023, which was struck down. It was decriminalized explicitly because it was considered archaic, and sexist. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/re-criminalising-adultery-as-a-gender-neutral-offence/article67565680.ece#:~:text=A%20five%2Djudge%20Constitution%20Bench%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20led,the%20…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:49 AM
2

My bad, going by memory, Quincy Adams was the 6th president, John Adams is the 2nd and was a defense lawyer in the Boston Massacre Trials.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 11:24 PM
9

According to John Quincy Adams, it would be the whole society. We find, in the rules laid down by the greatest English Judges, who have been the brightest of mankind; We are to look upon it as more beneficial, that many guilty persons should escape unpunished, than one innocent person should suffer. The reason is, because it’s of more importance to community, that innocence should be protected, than it is, that guilt should be punished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in the world, that all…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:51 PM
2

To report an inaccuracy, please email [email protected]. To make a formal complaint under IPSO rules please go to www.dailymail.co.uk/readerseditor where you will find an easy-to-use complaints form. You can also write to Readers’ Editor, Daily Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-3059433/Clarifications-corrections.html#:~:text=To%20report%20an%20inaccuracy%2C%20please,Derry%20Street%2C%20London%20W8%205TT.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 05:36 PM
12

The term, "witch hunt," has often been used to describe several male issues.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:00 AM
2

I believe in nudism. It's perfectly natural and there would be less interest in nudity if nudism was a common practice.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 07:07 PM
3

It's extra odd when that happens, one would think a woman would know when she's giving an underhanded compliment.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:47 PM
1

Rule 4
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:43 PM
2

He's probably in a big city, even grindr works best in metropoli.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:40 PM
3

Because it applies universally, Kenya is just the example. You also read it incorrectly, the Kenyan example refers to all but 1 tribe. Islam was under the, "Abrahamic pact," it's believed that the practice was always common in the peninsula, and they were generally attacked and subjugated pre-Judaism by the local empires like the levant was. The only thing you might argue is that circumcision is a symptom of a violent culture, there is no indication that the procedure makes individuals violent, …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:52 PM
4

Except it's the opposite in those countries. Tribal Kenya pre-colonization, for example, all but 1 tribe in the area perform ritual circumcision for that reason. They were known, like the majority of Sub-Saharan Africa, to be less violent than their indian/muslim/European counterparts. The violence that existed was only at the Tribal level, there are no spoken accounts of witch burning, beheadings, jizyah, or anything of the kind, not even grand wars. Because there is no relationship between vio…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:35 PM
0

Your premise is nothing but fallacious. Your only real examples are from African countries, and many of them did circumcision pre-judaism, they have historically been known to be more peaceful pre-colonization. There is no real relationship between circumcision and violent behavior beyond coincidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:22 PM
5

To say that the countries you mentioned here, and op did in the post, are violent because of circumcision is probably the most extreme example of a causal fallacy that I've ever seen. Read a history book ffs.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:12 PM
6

Maybe cause you cut their genitals without consent, which causes longterm changes to the brains fight or flight response which causes them to suffer & become more violent: Every country where men are circumcised strongly correlates with increased violence, misogyny, crime rates, suicide and "toxic masculinity" (forcing other men to fit in to their world view of how a man should be, which is where the term actually comes from) The opposite actually, I would suggest you not go there, E. Asian and …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:56 AM
4

Louisiana recently passed a law legalizing surgical castration for convicted rapists.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 11:30 PM
0

Dating isn't a game. It is highly individual and arbitrary. I'm not telling people to date, but the mgtows especially are wrong to state that it's not worth it, and that stuff like this proves it so. You don't need statistics to know that being within or above common attraction standards will attract more people.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 11:17 PM
-1

It was several separate studies, from 2015-2020, and psychology today is considered a reliable source. As opposed to some journalist on Medium making fallacious claims claims based on data from a dating app, data that, itself, is debatable.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:18 PM
0

That is false. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/202108/how-often-friends-become-lovers#:~:text=Nearly%2070%20percent%20of%20romances,to%20meet%20a%20potential%20partner.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:42 PM
-1

I never denied that women go for their perceived beauty standards on dating apps more often. But the mgtow interpretation of the data is nothing but fallacious, you have only utilized confirmation bias to sabotage the chances you would get a date. Going through friends and people you already know has always been more successful than dating apps, that was never even a question.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:18 PM
0

A study, in this case, as the article refers to it. Is, a detailed investigation and analysis of a subject or situation. -Oxford Languages It doesn't necessarily refer to research using surveys. Objectively, the data was found via a study. It is questionalbe, because the nature of the study is based on subjective opinions, and does not account for multiple variables, it only takes in swipe data from dating apps. And the interpretations of the pill people and mgtows are only subjective, if not fa…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:02 PM
0

It is quite actually called a, "study."
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:39 PM
-1

It discourages men from entering romantic relationships, when many, even in those groups, want to. But they rarely, if ever, provide suggestions, sources, or anything to alleviate the lonliness epidemic. It is harmful politically because they promote the gender war, and that is unpopular with the vast majority of people in the world.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:34 PM
-2

No one is assuming that, "it doesn't matter." But the messages that pill people and mgtows make, backed by these statistics, are nothing but harmful to men.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:13 PM
-6

Mgtows absolutely use that statistic as part of their talking points. The Mgtows absolutely utilize the studies as propaganda, case in point. The truth is that the message the Mgtows, and other false stoics, take from these statistics is only harmful. MRM means Men's Rights Movement, it is nothing but political by its nature.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:11 PM
-17

Regardless of your relationship status, the mgtow propaganda your pushing is not helpful to men socially, or the MRM politically.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:59 PM
-23

If you want it as an excuse to stay alone, like the mgtows, there's no one stopping you. But 2 dating sites, and two questionable studies, cannot give a total picture of the dating world, they barely say anything about those sites.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:47 PM
24

Because that study was done on okcupid, and only used the population of people who participated in the study with okcupid. It is only a true statistic on okcupid.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 03:58 PM
3

They were the bad kind of Mormons, a bit more than conservative.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:10 AM
8

Because the media does it, the older women do it, and every negative interaction with a guy provides confirmation of biases.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 08:36 AM
61

There's too much psuedo-science and outrageous statements here. Alot of African terrorists in those groups started as kids, slave soldiers, actual kids not teenagers. Membership was either forced, or religiously motivated by the fanatical Islamic brotherhoods that emerged in the 50s. Even as colonies, these were areas of constant conflict. There's no indication the want for a spouse is a major motivation. Or that their issues are with, "upper class chads." There's also a lot of variables left ou…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:31 AM
12

You should still go see a lawyer before the police contact you, and stop talking to them, they're not your friends.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:07 PM
3

The current relationship came about in the 70s between an article and a book, Feversham. There are no records of its existence in English common law. It's first recorded use was in sermons of James Durham, and it was used to say, "approximately." "Many profest Christians are like to foolish builders, who build by guess, and by rule of thumb and not by Square and Rule." -James Durham, late 1600s
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:34 PM
1

Compliments are opinions sir, they are not transactions.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:52 PM
3

I am pro life, but no, outlawing abortion would only be detrimental to men's rights. Abortion rights provide a major argument against unfair child support laws.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:48 PM
6

The last I heard about 40%, but a study the pentagon ordered put it at 18%, which is still alot more than the 1-5% percent commonly said. https://apnews.com/article/b5c40b513448cfc1269d51d923bb76f7 It's something that's difficult to figure out.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 06:50 PM
1

Ah yes, Gloria Steinem, Christina Hoff Sommers' arch nemesis. She ain't even in it for women as she single handedly manufactured the anorexia epidemic.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter