TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AdmirableSelection81 Archive

View 13 posts and 795 comments by AdmirableSelection81 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
419

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 01:51 PM
147

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 01:59 PM
94

Question For WomenAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 01:59 PM
68

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:06 PM
57

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:55 PM
51

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:05 PM
47

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:23 PM
21

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:35 PM
16

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:33 PM
11

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:19 PM
10

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:05 PM
9

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:15 PM
0

DebateAdmirableSelection81/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:45 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

The amount of women who are all over him on his stream is too staggering to even think he's paying all of them. He'd go broke fast. He has to pay for security, cameramen, other staff already etc. He doesn't make as much money streaming as you would think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 02:01 AM

Either way, the manosphere isn't getting them laid. It doesn't work. It anything it isolates them even further. Look at Clavicular, dude has a triple digit bodycount by doing insane looksmaxxing shit (TRT at 14, prescription meth to keep his body lean, bonesmashing his face, etc.). He gets wives and girlfriends to cheat on their significant other ON STREAM. Saying 'it doesn't work' is just cope. It doesn't work if you aren't willing to go far enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:51 AM
1

btw even if women wear a burqa or hijab or baggy sweatpants + hoody various people will stare at them... Stop the cap man You can dress how you want, but don't complain about 'unwated attention' when you're showing off your body
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:05 PM
2

lmfao, yeah because normal (non skin tight) shorts and sweatpants for women don't exist, come the fuck on. "go out of their way" LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOO Boy, that boulder you guys carry is heavy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:16 PM
1

Yes? What's the contradiction? They are inviting stares. I assume they're not idiots and realize that when they dress like that, they are doing so on purpose because they understand dressing to show off your body is the whole purpose. They're just mad when 'creeps' (aka low value men) look.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:14 PM
1

Because it's the main meat and potatoes, the women dressing like that isn't doing so because of 'comfort'. They're doing it to show off their bodies. I bought compression pants for outdoor running which is similar to those tights women wear, i wore them like... twice i didn't find it any more or less comfortable than joggers. I don't see men dressing in thoes tights. Just stop lying about that shit. You can't dress like that and complain about unwanted attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:09 PM
2

Moving what goal posts? That's the main issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:07 PM
0

They don't get caught in machines and they can handle large ranges of motion without binding or pinching. LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, i wear fucking joggers when i use cardio + lift weights and this has never been a concern ever. This is the most dishonest conversation ever. Good God, stop mentally contorting yourself over this, it's a horrible look. It's about advertising your sexuality. Like, i'm supposed to pretend the roided out dudes in my gym who wear this shit: https://litb-cgis.rightinthebox.com…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 03:36 PM
2

"i'm going to sexualize the hell out of myself, how dare you look at me" is stupid as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:53 PM
-1

Thousands of women complain about wanting to be left alone. THe overwhelming majority of women at my gym dress in those tight workout pants/shorts, knowing full well that they're inviting stares from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 11:05 AM

the dude looks great. ????????????????????????? he's way below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:08 PM

Because i don't the need to photoshop someone to make me feel something about their martyrdom? Seems like you're just mad that women look terrible here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:07 PM

Why wasn't this necessary for Luigi Mangione? Because Magnione is already good looking. Why didn't they do this for the Trump shooter? Because his face was fucked to such a degree that it would take a comical amount of photoshop to make him good looking. They basically just changed the dimensions of Alex Pretti's face (less long, more wide) and changed the skin tone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:00 PM

No, it's just logic. I can confidently say that most men won't feel the need to make him good looking in order to make him a martyr. Women will make a martyr of serial killers if he has nice facial features.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:59 PM

Because he's ugly and they can't feel anything for him unless they idealize him with an AI photoshop.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:53 PM

lol imagine defending murderers
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:52 PM

Because what theyr'e saying is you're not worthy of respect or sympathy if you're ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:51 PM

Because of logic? Why would a man need to beautify his face with AI/photoshop? We know how women treat good looking serial killers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:50 PM
18

There's the possibility that PPD selfs selects for really shitty highly neurotic women and the general female population isn't generally as bad as the PPD women would have you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:16 PM
-2

The missing ingredient in asia is religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:33 AM
1

The paradox of choice... unlmited choices makes everyone depressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:32 AM
7

This line of thinking is why trust in universities is tanking and why so much bad policy is coming out of those institutions... there's 0 debate and they have become echo chambers. The controversial article about the negative affects of women taking over these institutions is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:53 AM
1

has become lmao, 'has become'
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:48 AM
68

Western society is so cooked. Feminists inculcated the idea that women can only be victims into our zeitgeist to such a degree that poor mental health seems to be on the rise in young women. Zero accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 07:02 PM
13

If I tell a man he’s like a brother to me This is the opposite of a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:46 AM
2

Nah, women are pretty universal in what the OP is complaining about: women want all the benefits of each sex without the downsides of either. Men need to be aggressive and initiate, but somehow be able to read minds/predict the future to figure out whether or not said man is in his league. Basically women have to be comfortable in all of these situations while men have to shoulder the risk of rejection and shaming. This is why so many men are giving up, there's 0 social grace coming from women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:39 AM
3

"ugh, i have to talk to this 5'6" manlet for a few minutes, i guess i'll get it over with so i can talk to that 6'2" hottie afterwards" "it went fine"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:02 PM
3

As an OBLIGATION lmao There was the 5 minutes with each person, where the woman was socially obligated to speak with a man. And then after everyone had a turn speaking to everyone else, there was some free time that anyone can talk to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:20 PM
1

If anything thats the game coorderinators fault for not setting it up properly. What are they supposed to do, reprogram evolutionary psychology in these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:54 AM
-2

Why are crime rates lower today than in the 80s, on a per 100k basis? Because of mass incarceration. Even the Democrats/NAACP were for this back in the 90's. That was easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:20 AM

Elon Musk got Amber Heard to cosplay his favorite video game characters for his own sexual fantasies: https://pagesix.com/2023/09/13/elon-musk-confirms-ex-amber-heard-dressed-as-mercy-from-overwatch-for-roleplay/ Even though Musk and Heard had a really hard time having a normal relationship considering their non overlapping schedules. Amber Heard abused the fuck out of Johnny Depp. Johnny Depp is considered a sex symbol and certainly not short on cash. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 08:29 PM
9

Hugh Grant hired a prostitute that looked like a dude when he was with liz hurley (at her peak).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:03 PM
19

But "Chad" doesn't need to hook up with average women, because he always has attractive options readily available. If he doesn't, then he's not Chad by definition. This is untrue. Look at Tiger Woods, he was cheating on his wife with ASS ugly women (along with attractive ones). Being chad still takes effort (just less effort than normie dudes).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 01:44 PM

From an evolutionary standpoint, this would make sense. Before civilization (laws, criminal justice, police, etc.) might made right and if you weren't the baddest motherfucker around, you could lose your shit, your life, your family. For a woman, being around a man capable of violence (even if she had to endure some himself) was a 'good deal' because he could protect the family and take resources from others by force.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:24 PM
3

lmao, lesbians have the highest rates of domestic violence compared to all other same sex/opposite sex pairings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:55 AM

Of course i value her as she is now, her being marriage material and marrying young is the filter. The women who don't get married early are unmarried for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:05 PM

The good ones are locked up young.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:29 PM

Why? She would have never been single in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:29 PM

Except she wouldn't be single because she's awesome. The good ones are already taken. If you're a single woman in your 30's, then you either suck or you have terrible judgement in character.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:09 PM

She's a great wife even in the present. If i met her when she was older and still single, i would question why she was older and single.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:12 PM

Speaking as a happily married man: Because my wife gave me wonderful memories of our youth together. I wouldn't have married her if she were older because i would question why no man bothered to lock her up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 12:13 PM
3

1) It's hilarious that you are using a progressive website to call something else 'propaganda' "SourceWatch.org is owned and operated by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD), a progressive nonprofit watchdog and advocacy organization based in Madison, Wisconsin. CMD" The difference between their articles on fox news and msnbc are hilarious: https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=MSNBC 2) that study wasn't done by IFStudies, it was don…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:54 PM
3

It amazes me that feminists will just make things up like this. WHere did i get this info from? Reality: From the General Society Survey: https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey Specifically this chart: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/figurewomen-w640.png
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 12:22 PM
2

Women spend much more money frivolously than men. Take a look at their closets. Their shoes. Their levels of student loan debt and consumer debt. WHen you put it that way, it's no wonder modern women have higher rates of depression/mental illness than before. Imagine trying to make yourself happy by buying another $5000 handbag while they're drowning in debt, meanwhile married women with children are the most happy women in the country because they have more meaning in their life. I suspect all …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 05:44 PM
17

I don't believe for a moment that women are having sex with men "out of their league" and expecting to date him. This sounds like a male revenge fantasy. Oh yeah, all those 'are we dating the same guy' facebook groups with angry women bitching about unknowingly being a side piece came out of nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:38 AM
5

Studies > your personal experience Just because something is a study doesn't mean it's well designed or that people tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 12:40 AM

When women ask men what they bring to the table, those men better have a good list. When men ask women what they bring to the table, they respond by saying, "i AM the table" Gendered narcissim along with feminism is going to destroy the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:22 PM
4

Speaking as someone who's barely a GenXer, he's completely right. It somewhat accelerated with social media and went up like a rocket with dating apps. In my youth, guys had no problems getting dates. The egos and narcissism of young women is astronomically higher than women of my generation. The internet has given women way too much validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:22 PM
-2

Thank you for basically admitting what i said was right. Actually you can force women... i use AI a lot and from what i've read, women's fake email jobs will be the first to go, when that happens women will lose a lot of their leverage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 03:13 PM
8

It doesn't matter because say it's like 40% of women dating 25% of men (rather than 80% of women are dating 15%), you still have an enormous problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 01:55 PM
10

It doesn't matter if it's bullshit, it's directionally correct, even a moderate imbalance can fuck things up big time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 01:20 PM
0

That's like the only parts of the country that might have any appreciable amount of the culture you are talking about and i have my doubts about even that in this current day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 01:37 PM
-3

There's hardly anyone who lives in the rural parts of the bible belt. Who cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 01:33 PM
-2

Yeah i'm supposed to believe they teach that shit in Atlanta Georgia because it's 'in the bible belt'... one of the most ratchet ass cities i've ever been to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 01:02 PM
0

As a Catholic who grew up in the Bible Belt lmao, what % of the population is that? 1%? Most people live in cities.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:47 PM
7

No it doesn't, jesus christ. Here's an example of survivorship bias with respect to busuiness law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias#Business_law Please explain to me where people lived or died in this example. Nobody has ever used 'survivorship bias' to mean literally life and death. It absolutely can mean success and failure, just like this example in business law and eHarmony.com.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:16 PM
12

Maybe approach men in your league.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:29 PM
6

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, OMG, you're kidding me, right? It doesn't literally mean life/death, it can mean success and failure, i learned this concept with regards to finance/investing in one of my college classes. Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:12 PM
26

Or, hear me out, he finds her so annoying he doesn't want to bother. I've encountered countless conventionally attractive women whose personalities are so shit, it's a turnoff. Female narcissism is just nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 01:22 PM
9

Survivorship bias. Kinda reminds me of how men will argue that men are taller than women on average, but then a 5'9" chick will be, 'but i'm taller than a lot of men i know!"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 12:39 PM
1

Women are the civilizing force for men, women are the limiting factor. That's why men setup patriarchy. Feminism is destructive for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:34 PM
19

When TRP gets published in the NYT Op-eds let me know.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:53 PM
32

One gets mainstreamed, the other doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:43 PM
0

Nah, I don't know any women who get validation from male attention Social media has entered the chat Female depression is highly linked to social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:05 PM
10

Men have very low standards. Women have very high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:04 PM
11

No I blame men for giving attention to the shallow and vapid women. On average, women have a much higher height preference (women want men 8 inches taller and don't want to date men shorter than them) than men do (men prefer 3 inches taller, but are open to dating women slightly taller than they are). Shallow and vapid would describe most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 05:51 PM
3

This is why dark triad men get so many more dates than 'sensitive' men, if you think highly of yourself (narcissim), are machiavellian (you only care about what you can take from the world), and are psychopathic (disregard for social norms, disregard for the rights of others, willing to use deceit and manipulation to get what you want), it's not a shock that dark triad men are able to do so well in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:55 PM
18

The pigwoman experiment (plus related similar experiments) proves the OP wrong: https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/ Literally the most revolting woman they could make (that doesn't even look human) in photoshop and 'she' still got tons of dm's/right swipes. These experiments have been done more than 10 years, why are we still pretending the opposite is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:52 PM
8

I mean, if that's what women want? It's a problem with women, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:35 AM
3

Hierarchy of oppression, certain groups get away with that shit. Just like in the UK, there are certain groups that basically got away with child rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:10 AM
1

Many of your jobs are literally worthless and some even have negative value for society (way too many of them are government funded sinecures)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 03:41 PM
2

And women don't need providers in 2025, as men keep raging about we've all been brainwashed into having careers and earning our own money by feminism As someone who is heavily into AI (as in, using AI to automate my own job), i'm going to laugh my ass off when women face mass unemployment as their jobs are the first to go, meanwhile men in trades will be the ones left standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:07 AM
1

If it were really a meritocracy, the best person would get the job, but bias exists. Studies show identical résumés with female names get rated lower. Plenty of men in STEM aren’t there purely on skill either—they just had more opportunities. I'm supposed to pretend that Elon is a nazi but his xAI company is almost all chinese/indian dudes and his 2nd in command is Chinese, but he's being racist against white men and women in general and doesn't care about meritocracy. "studies show" FUCK ALL. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 12:36 PM
7

I used to work for a tech firm that went out of its way to recruit women as software engineers. It turns out, it's a great way to recruit eventual project managers. Because they couldn't code.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:51 PM
11

A patriarchal society is one of merit, not one that says, because you're a woman, you get to get the STEM job, while the nerd who spends all day doing coding assignments then does coding projects for fun on his time off gets to work as a barista. A patriarchal society wouldn't allow rapists/thieves/murderers into their country (this is a consequence of the unlimited empathy that women have, see what's going on in Europe right now). A patriarchal society would recognize that men and women are dif…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:04 PM
19

We live in a gynocentric society. Women and accountability are like oil and water.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 08:53 PM
23

His date was definitely kind of a dick about it Lets be honest, this is how most modern women would react and they would react even worse than this woman. They're allowed to be dicks. It's like how men are shamed if they have preferences for women who aren't heavy, but somehow women are freely able to shame short men. There's an assumption that there's something wrong with a man if he wasn't able to attract a woman by a certain age. It's the same reason why women are attracted to married men: "H…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 08:31 PM
0

I was pointing out women were the issue. Because gay men have the least amount of issues while lesbians have the most. Straights inbetween. I'm beginning to think gay men were called gay (as in happy) because they don't have to deal w/ women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 11:14 AM
-2

lmao of course it's true, not only is the divorce/breakup rates higher, lesbians have higher rates of domestic violence than straight men/women, gay men (who have the least). We know EXACTLY who the problem is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 07:11 PM

seems like you are really trying to flex Flex what? He was put in a fucking horrible situation that i would never want to be in. Get some perspective. Stop trying to cover for women when they act like shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:56 PM
-1

Survivorship bias. I know a 6' woman, therefore women are as tall as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:10 PM
-1

Then you learn that you were not compatible with the other person. Being yourself doesn't mean that you will be attractive to every person you meet, it just means that you'll weed out people who don't like you for who you really are. 5'5" dudes be, 'damn, i didn't realize i could change who i really was, i now identify as a 6'3" nba player'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:56 PM

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:34 PM

Besides looks, men value personality/loyalty in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:08 PM
2

most women get approached a lot This is also unequivocally false. My wife was/is quite beautiful (especially when she was younger). When i was younger, i was always insecure about the fact that men would always check her out whenever we went out. They would do so even if it was obvious that i saw them. She would get hit on ... MAYBE once a month (if i wasn't around).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:40 PM
6

This is unequivocally false. The reason why women will call low status men 'creeps' is because it damages their social status if a low status men hits on them. The idea that a low status man thinks he is in the same stratosphere of status as the girl in question causes most women anxiety and is deeply damaging to their social status. By calling him a 'creep', what she's really saying is, 'there's something mentally wrong with that guy'. That deflects from the fact that the guy is just a mentally…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:17 PM
18

lmaoooooooooooooooo A nice 5'5" guy who makes minimum wage and he respectfully goes up to a woman and flirts with her. She rejects, he walks away. "EWWWWWWWW HE'S A CREEP" You may want to step back on posting for a bit and self reflect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 02:41 PM
74

No man has ever said that there aren't creeps. Every guy sees that women way overuse the word creep for 'low status men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 12:48 PM

I'm married. Leonardo Dicaprio has a choice. A 5'5" POC who is balding working a minimum wage job has 0 choice. "Here's an empty bowl of M&M's, you can choose from the various colors of ... zero M&M's in this bowl. ENJOY!"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 05:30 PM

Welcome to the lives of most men. Take the photo of the most revolting woman you can find, photoshop her with chest hair and facial features of a pig, and watch how many options she has in online dating, it's astounding: https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/ The problem with your posts is that you operate on the assumption that men and women are the same and never think about first principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 05:05 PM

Men don't choose, women choose. The overwhelming majority of men have to constantly shoot their shot and hope they land SOMEONE. If you go through a dumpster and you find a rotting peace of meat and you're starving, what choice do you have? Women are the ones with choice. Choice implies OPTIONS
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 04:54 PM
9

I mean, i've seen girls call unattractive guys creepy just for being a little flirty, but not pushy... and it was just because he was average height and below average face.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 10:01 PM
20

Awkwardness IS creepy to women. Or at least it gives women 'the ick'. Basically if your personality and looks aren't on point, you're a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:48 PM
1

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO wow, a difference without a distinction. Like, yeah, i get instagram isn't technically a dating app, but the idea was that people mostly met 'through work and social circles'. Which is clearly not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 03:28 PM
1

"Situationships" wasn't a word in my generation. This is much different than being a 'player'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:50 PM
1

Sounds like you're talking about situationships, that was not something i saw as a genxer
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:38 PM
1

I mean, are we counting 'hookups' as dating now? That may be the change.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:30 PM
5

I used to be 260 pounds... i lost a ton of weight, gained quite a bit of muscle. The change to my face was just as dramatic as the change to my chest or my belly, maybe even moreso.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:24 PM
2

According to stats, GenZers are having a harder time dating than GenXers
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:20 PM
3

.... all stats show that dating apps is how most people meet
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:56 PM
11

If you can't get a gf now, you probably wouldn't have back then either. As a GenXer, this is completely false. When i was in high school, most people were paired up. The younger generations are lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:55 PM
4

without looking at any pic I wouldn't choose "ambitious/intelligent". It gives me crypto bro, influencer, ponzi scheme vibes. The word "ambitious" could mean the guy is selfish. I hate competitive people. Bravo, this is fantastic mental gymnastics, gold medal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:31 PM
11

Men are far more honest about their shallow preferences, FAR more. This is the crux of the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:53 PM
17

Women admit their shallow preferences if they have them This is, of course, a big fat neutron star sized lie you just told. When considering a potential long-term mate for daughters, both women and their parents state that a potential partner's ambition and intelligence are more important than physical attractiveness. However, both women and their parents make mate choices that contradict their stated preferences, favoring a physically attractive partner for daughters over an ambitious and intel…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:34 PM
1

There’s a reason why RP followers are chronically single and incapable of holding down a relationship. I mean, i've been married since 2009 but go on
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:31 AM
9

Charles Manson and other serial killers getting a shit ton of interest from women is a bit much, you have to admit. Motherfucker even got married to a young hottie when he was like a 2/10 80 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:26 AM
2

There is a page on twitter called "mugshawties" or something and it's full of men dickriding criminal women and saying "oh i can fix her". I follow that twitter account. I find it amusing and i like looking at hot women. There's no way in hell i'd date them, and i've made similar comments, in jest.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:24 AM
0

*Self inflicted mental health crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:20 PM
1

You don't need to explain to me, because you're wrong. Various versions of the pigwoman experiment have been done (multiple times with the pigwoman), and many times with other unattractive women, with similar results. Experiments with average and even above average looking men have found the opposite result: tumbleweeds, this experiment has been done many... many times. At this point, the people who pretend that there aren't massive differences in the results that men and women get are just inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:47 PM
2

The pigwoman experiment has been done many ... many times buddy. Other people downloaded the picture and replicated the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:19 AM
8

Yeah, he needs to invent a time machine back to like 1950 or something if he wants a quality one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:39 PM
5

It's pathetic that i even need to provide a source, this should be common sense. Male thirst is universally well known to everyone who isn't a clueless bluepill newbie.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 01:10 AM
13

No, it's not true for women, at all https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:13 PM
12

This isn’t just men, there are some woman who will never experience romantic relationships. I'm begging you, please just do some basic experimentation and you people would understand this isn't true at all https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:12 PM
2

You are so out of touch with reality I know i replied to you a second ago, but i just have to reply again with this to you: https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/ If you want 'out of touch with reality', just look in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:12 PM
11

Not only is that not true Do you people just intentionally confine yourself to a bubble or something? I don't understand, of COURSE it's true, look a the pigwoman experiment: https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:11 PM
9

According to............ what? According to the pig woman experiment: https://www.hiddendominion.com/the-online-dating-pig-experiment/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 10:10 PM
2

and men being in power so yea And what does a woman who makes mid 6 figures and is a VP at a corporation do?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:59 PM
3

Ugly women want to the special princess treatment as well. Ugly women can get hundreds of matches on tinder, see the 'pigwoman experiment'. Feminists are hypocrites. The problem is women of all attractiveness can get attention and inflate their own perceived value.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 02:04 PM
3

You're heavily implying that ugly feminists are willing to go 50-50, that simply isn't true. And even if it were, why would anyone want to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 01:45 PM
5

Even most loud feminists don't want to go 50-50. You want your cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 01:41 PM
6

If we were living in the 1950's, no man would complain about it. Women are now 'strong and independent, but don't want to pay for shit. That's why it's infuriating. Like Bill Burr says, women treat 'equality' like a buffet, they want all the good parts of it, but none of the 'icky' parts, like paying 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 01:31 PM
1

Either because she’s not hot or she’s more of a feminist. If she's feminist, she's most likely not hot. Also, if she's feminist, there's still a very good chance she wants you to pay for all of it. That is why men are upset. It's the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 01:11 PM
1

What my norms are is meaningless. Biology doesn't give 1 fuck about my opinion or yours. I'm just observing biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 08:49 PM
1

You treat them different because men and women are different. AI can distinguish between male and female brains with like 98% accuracy. Because male and female brains are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 07:49 PM
1

If this were a man doing this - this would not even be news. Yes, because men and women are different. Men wouldn't be crying on camera afterwards, like lily.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 07:31 PM
1

She's been doing this for a while, just not with 100 or 1000 guys
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:56 AM
-1

Again, what does a high iq (decent chance of autism) engineering student have in common with some mid-iq chick studying education? The guy is probably into anime and video games... which women, apparently, find repulsive, based on that poll i saw for which hobbies women dislike seeing men partake in that came out recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:53 PM
-1

a large number of men Again, 60/40 female/male split in college makes that untrue already. And useless degrees have a higher proportion of women in them, for the most part. Funny enough, a higher porportion of dumb/average men are smart enough to not go to college, many are going to trades, which is facing shortages of workers, which exacerbates the issue because trades are male dominated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:51 PM
1

If you don’t think accountants get married to other accountants I have a lake in the Sahara desert to sell you. Where did i say that? If you think that chart is even remotely useful then you’re just wrong. LMAO, anyone who ever went to college knows that engineers aren't drowning in pussy Having a high IQ is correlated to virginity: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/ I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:43 PM
-11

Women don't NEED to have a worthwhile degree. It's a choice, which men dont' have. If women were so keen on 'paying the bills', they'd be going for more lucrative disciplines like engineering rather than moronic ones like education and social work. Imagine being a male school teacher making $50k a year and how much interest women would have over him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:41 PM
0

Exceptions don't make the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:33 PM
-6

That's a privilege for women. Men are expected to be providers. Women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:31 PM
1

Compatability is a problem here, even before those 2 things you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:27 PM
0

Wrong!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:21 PM

Sexually closed but agreeable women are screwed in society, that's my point. Women tilt towards that to varying degrees. A sexually closed and disagreeable woman can defend herself. However, most women are agreeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 02:19 AM

these types of women have lowered the bar so much that most men expect sex and want it right away. And this is a problem for most women, because most women aren't like that. Essentially 'sex positive' feminists who are sexually open and disagreeable fucked over most women who are not sexually open and agreeable, so a lot of women are pressured into sex because this has become the default in society. Letting a bunch of extremists speak for everyone else and change sexual norms has been a disaster…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 01:18 AM
3

That was rhetorical! Holy shit. The obvious answer to that is NO.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:43 PM
1

"Feminists pretend men's rights activists don't exist"? ???????????????? I never said that. Now you're just making things up. MRA's were constantly told that Mens Rights movement wasn't needed because feminism already took care of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:22 PM
3

LMAO, since like 10+ years ago, do you honestly believe feminists just pretended mens rights activists didn't exist? They HATE them. This retconning and gaslighting is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:20 PM
0

That's literally what feminists were saying in response to the rise of MRA's on this website.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:16 PM
2

I think the disconnect occurs when men expect women to equally advocate for their issues MRA's were constantly told that Mens Rights movement wasn't needed because feminism already took care of it. The gaslighting is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:53 PM
11

Ok, i make 6 figs and i'm married. Hypothetically speaking, if i were single and unemployed, do you think any feminist would want to marry me? Note: I do quite a bit of housework which i share with my wife who also works (cook, clean, yard work, laundry, garbage duty, grocery shopping etc.) even with a full time job. I would absolutely do 100% of the housework if i were married to a woman who was the sole breadwinner, to be fair. However, the number of 'feminists' who would want to marry me in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:44 PM
19

feminism seems to be the only place where men are told they don’t have to be a provider. GASPS, AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah, good luck with that. Stated vs. Revealed preferences. Why would you EVER believe anything a feminist says?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 07:06 PM
-2

The whole point of patriarchy/religion was to protect women from being used as a disposable fleshlight from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:25 PM
-18

Women are highly impressionable that's the issue. The only people who can act with true autonomy are high-t men and autistics dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:39 PM
0

I posted videos of her crying, so uh, not sure what you're on about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:37 PM
-10

Sure, sleeping 100 men in a single day isn't popular. But the overton window keeps moving. A woman sleeping with 20 dudes over a few years would be considered disgusting in the past. Now? Quaint.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:36 PM
-19

Women slutting it up puts pressure on other women to slut it up when it comes to relationships. The problem is, women have high levels of agreeableness, but lower levels of socio-sexuality. But because of societal expectations, they feel pressured to have sex when they might not want to when they meet new potential dates. This shit doesn't happen in a vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:35 PM
-13

Other girls who think about slutting it up. Women will do whatever is popular in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:25 PM
-2

She's extremely happy right now. The face of happiness https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gec0wOaXIAUEkpg?format=jpg&name=medium
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:23 PM
-17

If the only person this hurt was her, that would be one thing, but one thing about women is that they just follow whatever the popular zeitgeist tells them to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:20 PM
-2

She's extremely happy right now. You can tell from her tears that she's jubilant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:19 PM
1

The irony is that "icks" were first really put into public consciousness through a man on Seinfeld. Men are too desperate to have 'icks'.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:11 AM

So women support each other INSTITUTIONS support women (government, k-12, college, ngo's, corporations, etc.).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 11:30 PM

I never said one was 'better than the other', i said they were different which is why men and women have different interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:10 PM

It's innate. Machine learning algorithms can already tell the difference between male and female brains based on brain scans at like a 95% accuracy rate. We know male and female brains are just different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:06 PM

Good thing i'm not talking about children. I'm talking about newborn babies. https://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/5b1501/F/sex.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:58 PM

https://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/5b1501/F/sex.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:57 PM

I can support it because there have been studies on this https://www.math.kth.se/matstat/gru/5b1501/F/sex.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:57 PM

Men aren't influenced by society to get into STEM, it's genetic. Men are interested in things, women are interested in people. Newborn male babies, when given the choice between an image of a thing or a person will pick the thing, female babies the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:44 PM

He did shoot up to fame with a ton of likes and followers and the media was focused on him. You're not a nobody with that much attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:39 PM

I think you'll need to re-read the entire thread and rethink who is racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:31 PM

because education is now a genuine meritocracy The amount of affirmative action for women getting into STEM is insane. LMAO believing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:22 PM

why don’t more men go to college? I came across this late night, this is a pretty good summary: https://x.com/eyeslasho/status/1866157670979571901
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:22 PM

Most dudes aren't watching Andrew Tate Teachers have said they are alarmed at the number of young boys who are fans of Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:19 PM
11

lmao, all the single men i know are hygenic and they can't find partners. do you think all men are just homeless crack addicts or something? Those women are bullshitting, they want 666 men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 05:19 PM
19

The implication is that they can't find men who are hygenic, which is, of course, bullshit. They can't find men they want for other superficial reasons but they don't want to say it out loud. That's why i find women who say they only date men 6 feet or taller, while unrealistic, is at least honest about what they're looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 04:52 PM
57

When do they do this? Can you explain it in context? Speaking as a GenX married man who is frequently online... I mean, i've seen this sentiment expressed by women online who are disatisfied with their dating life basically telling men to step up. "You just need to shower and clean yourself, that's all i want!" (lmao). It's almost used as a way to insult men as a group while forcibly making women look reasonable. It's silly and bullshit, there are a plethora of men who keep clean, you just don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 01:52 PM
5

Even average dudes struggle
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:22 PM
6

Following me home, spiking my drink, or trying to break into my house (all things that men I don't know have done), not OK. Notice that women have to move goalposts in order to deflect the fact that nobody was talking about this, but the mere fact that men might want to go up to talk to a woman is 'problmematic' for some women who will put them on blast on social media is the problem we're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:06 PM
16

Just approach women does not mean everyone is going to reciprocate attention. NO SHIT. That's not the problem, the problem is that if you're ugly, women will be extraordinarily offended that you think you're in their league. Many times you are in their league, but some 5's think they deserves 8's because some 8's pumped and dumped them a few times.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:05 PM
13

Women are held to more rigid standard of appearance, LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO women dress however they want where i live (often like slobs) this isn't 1940 anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:22 PM
10

lol, ugly men have trouble getting into relationships (serious or casual) with ugly women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 08:42 PM
1

Previous surveys that asked Americans to weigh the morality of certain behaviors either did not specify the gender of the subject in the question or, as is the case with Gallup’s question, mentioned both men and women. We developed a novel approach that asked respondents to respond to a question that explicitly references gender. As we explain in our report, “half of the sample were asked to judge the morality of these behaviors when a man engaged and an identical number of respondents when a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 01:08 PM
0

What does this mean? As a liberal woman, I’m just curious. Liberal women have the highest rates of mental illness out of conservative men, conservative women, liberal men, and liberal women. There was a study that showed that the overwhelming majority of conservative women thought it was ever wrong to cheat while less than 50% of liberal women said the same thing. Liberal women are just garbage dating/marriage prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:02 PM
9

His kids hate him. ONE kid who transitioned hates him because Elon is pissed at the left for transing his kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:57 PM
5

Just going to hijack this top comment, but i've been called an incel here even though i'm married and sexually active and i asked the person wtf does incel even mean in this context and that person said i gave off 'incel vibes'. Given that my wife is quite a bit more attractive than i am, i don't know how the hell i landed her if my personality was like that. This is just feminist being 'highly regarded' and nobody should give a fuck what feminists think. Basically feminists are trying to hijack…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:41 PM
1

Most words have changed over time to have multiple meanings. Every time someone calls someone an incel when they aren't an incel, the word falls on its face because the overhwelming majority of people will call you out for misusing the word. The meanings of words don't change just because 1% of the population has severe mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:38 PM
0

Incel = misogynist is how dudes like Elon Musk ended up getting called an incel. Then just call him a mysogynist (not like there's any evidence of that) instead of trying to shoehorn a word that makes 0 fucking sense in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:37 PM
7

EMT's probably save more lives than surgeons and you don't see women jumping on their dicks, lmao, get real. If women rewarded men for doing 'the right thing', we'd be living in Utopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:33 PM

maybe men should also be accountable for being bad choices in the first place. Men have longer prison sentences than women do for the same crimes. In fact, it's common for women to not even go to prison when men do with the same situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 11:02 PM
39

The combination of feminism and dating apps ruined it all. Redpill is just a reaction to all of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:12 PM
-2

I mean, this was like around like 2013 i'm guessing, sorry i didn't bookmark it. I saw what i saw. Television has been looking down on fathers (weird how every real life/cartoon sitcom the father is all fat and dumb and makes a mess while the wife is always thin, hot, and smart and has to clean up after her stupid husband)... and you think it's beyond the realm of possibility that batshit crazy feminists disparage fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 11:55 PM
1

Ah yeah, because that is all female nurses do, and the rest of their shift they just sit on their lazy ass and let those 2,2% of male nurses do all the physical work for them. Clearly fantasy land. That's literally what happens. Females aren't physically capable of moving adult human beings (some of them massively overweight) on and off the beds. Male nurses have complained on reddit about being assigned for this and injuring their backs. Even MEN have trouble moving fatties. It surely must be h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 11:53 PM
-4

You need a citation to realize that feminists have high levels of neuroticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 10:01 PM
2

I remember years ago when father's day happened, feminists were making videos about how we shouldn't be celebrating fathers. Are they still doing that for men's day?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 09:58 PM
1

physically demanding than caring for elderly or sick people? Because any time a patient needs to be lifted up, they get male nurses to do that. You think 120 pound women are lifting up land whales onto beds? This country is fat as hell, they're not asking women to do the dirty work. They're asking guys like me who can deadlift 600 pounds. Dispensing medicine is such hard work. Totally the equivalent of this: https://x.com/bud_cann/status/1858737138965029275
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 09:54 PM
2

Eh, i use AI and i automated a shitload of my job.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 09:02 PM
-1

"Plenty" https://careersmart.org.uk/occupations/equality/which-jobs-do-men-and-women-do-occupational-breakdown-gender
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 09:01 PM
15

Which is why feminists make a HUGE stink over the unbalanced representation in STEM between men and women... while women don't give a shit that hardly any woman is a plumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:59 PM
0

I'm married, so either way it doesn't matter. Just a funny observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:59 PM
0

I'm a married man, so being a tradwife wasn't in the cards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:58 PM
-2

It's funny because modern women are wayyyyyyyyyyy too confident for their own good. "I'm a strong independent woman, i don't need no man!" AI takes over your job suddenly being a tradwife doesn't sound so bad compared to starving
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:43 PM
3

? What did i say that was wrong? I mean, hell, i have an email job myself and i'm at risk. Only difference is, i'm no scared to pickup a hammer and do hard physical labor whenever the AI revolution comes. You think women want to do those jobs? Office jobs are going to be at risk the most because AI can do tasks that humans find really difficult (like advanced math). For tasks that humans find easy that involves physical labor (like changing a p-trap under your sink), robots are very very far awa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:36 PM
9

CS professor and bio-roboticist myself Surely representative of the fairer sex Google recently stated that 25% of the code they produce is being generated by LLM's. CS grads can't find jobs right now. I wouldn't be so comfy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:23 PM
9

It's going to be funny when/if artificial intelligence explodes and email office jobs (which women are overrepresented in) gets automated and the only jobs that don't get automated in the near future are manual jobs, which men are overrepresented in, women are either going to have to come crawling back or they're going to have to pick up some tools to unclog my pipe when i need a plumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:13 PM

Those sucked for women who got into shotgun marriages because they couldn't keep their knees together.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:18 PM
2

if you are desirable enough Sure, if you are 6'2", v taper, chiselled jaw, etc. So like... almost nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 01:24 PM
2

My friends only date ugly ass men Isn't the internet great? You can post anything you want, even if it's completely untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 01:23 PM
2

Sure we have "choice" but there's no guarantee that the man we choose is kind, or respects us, or isn't lying about his intentions, or isn't dangerous, or any other of the thousands of ways things could go wrong for us very quickly. Gosh, it's almost like we had a system in place where women where chaste and vetted men and then feminism destroyed that by giving sex out like candy and shocked pikachu face, the fuckboy was created. We had social norms for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 01:20 PM
1

It's good advice like saying you should spend money on the lottery is good advice. Sure, some people win, but not much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:53 PM
5

I have some bad news for men who follow your advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:46 PM
3

When the venn diagram is almost a perfect circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 01:34 AM
2

Yeah, the human biodiversity content on twitter is fucking amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 01:39 AM
8

lmaoooooooooooooooooo @ you considering these to be high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 12:29 AM
9

Gosh, based on your logic, as an above average man, maybe i should shoot my shot with victoria's secret models. Do you people think before you type?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 12:28 AM

If anything short guys should be thankful. Women are forcing you to pursue success and excellence in life lmao, tall men make more money on average than short men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:08 AM

(Trust fund kid): Have you considered working hard instead of being poor?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:07 AM

Being obese is undoubtedly considered less attractive than being short There are obese women who will literally say no obese men. And there are non-obese men desperate enough to date these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:05 AM
-3

Most of the conservative men I see are either naive, desperate simps or stubbornly cling on to their “values” even if they’re only negatively affecting them. Liberal men are physically/mentally weak and are confused about their own gender, what are you even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 09:50 PM

Yeah, but women have a higher hit rate on getting what they want (when they're younger). They're the limiting option. A man can want a victoria's secret model all he wants, he's not going to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 08:03 PM

I never said i was going to change women's preferences, i'm explaining it. It's possible if women were taught basic statistics (ladies, take stats instead of useless degrees like social work or art history), things might be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:59 PM

I think we're seeing a bifrucation: 1) Men dropping out of society don't care (when something is way too expensive, people don't want to buy it) 2) Men who have super high motivatation and/or were blessed with the right genetics care enough to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:59 PM

but I'm not sure that height is always a part of that Statistically, on average, height is more important to women than men (women, on average, want men 8 inches taller than she is, men want women 3 inches shorter). my bf is slightly shorter than me This is not how statistics works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:54 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlGixnTppOU
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:53 PM

"Better than her" is already a given. The bigger limiting factor is "better than other men", which makes it even harder for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:52 PM
6

As a fellow tall woman I felt that within the depths of my soul. I'm also a bit tired of short women demanding tall men as if it makes any sense whatsoever. If you're 5ft 2 why exactly do you need a 6ft 4 man to feel petite and protected? Surely 5ft 8 - 5ft 10 will do. Rant over sorry lol It's hilarious when you tall women rant about short women like this. You people don't understand that short women don't want 'better than them', they want 'better than other men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:20 PM

Because it does? LMAO? I just showed you, even in the worst circumstances, white and asian kids outperform everyone else who are in much better circumstances. An asian and white kids whose parents didn't graduate high school will outscore a black kid whose parents have PhD's on the SAT's: https://i.imgur.com/TaL3b5W.png At all district spending levels asian and white children at the poorest districts will outperform black kids at even the richest districts: https://i.imgur.com/01Huipj.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 10:43 PM

Because each state has different demographics and race predicts academic performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:52 PM

Adjsuted for demographics florida is the best performing school system in the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:42 PM

Everything. An asian and white kids whose parents didn't graduate high school will outscore a black kid whose parents have PhD's on the SAT's: https://i.imgur.com/TaL3b5W.png At all district spending levels asian and white children at the poorest districts will outperform black kids at even the richest districts: https://i.imgur.com/01Huipj.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:41 PM

You have to adjust for demographics. States with heavily white/asian (especially asian) kids are going to fare better. That is why Massachusetts is such a high performing state. It has nothing to do with their 'education' policies. That being said, mississippi is doing something right: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/kids-reading-scores-have-soared-in-mississippi-miracle
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:31 PM

Harming bright kids is going to destroy the economy. California didn't even improve math performance with black and brown kids with their scheme, it just hurt poor white and asian kids. It was a net negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:29 PM

Attractive men won't lose sleep and are obviously happy about the situation: they're the winners in this scenario. Young women don't complain because they have a high time preference and don't mind being bounced around by a bunch of high value men, but once they get older, they have regrets. By that time, what incentive do they have to make the situation better? They're used up and worthless. There's 0 incentive to address the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:23 PM

Democrats are the ones who are motivated by ideology, not educational outcomes. Look at what happened to California: Whites and Asians were far too ahead in math comapred to black and brown kids. Instead of lifting up the black and brown kids, they decided to move algebra from 8th grade to 9th grade, forcing high school kids to miss on calculus, putting high achieving kids behind who want to go to stanford or UCLA/UC Berkeley in computer science. The asian parents especially are PISSED that Cali…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:18 PM

I'm looking at cities that are fully captured by Democrats like Baltimore, Washington DC, Detroit, etc... the education in those cities are HORRENDOUS. Children are illiterate and inumerate and graduating from high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 09:13 PM

Democrats are forcing parents to 'choose' a monopoly on education: public schools ruled by teachers unions that forces BLM and gender ideology down everyone's throats rather than teaching reading/math. We need choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 08:32 PM
4

That means as in being "chaotic" rather than "lawful"; not as in being "evil" rather than "good". Men with dark triad traits get laid far more than men without. Statistically speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 10:42 PM

Feminism and social media has turned women into extreme narcissists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:55 AM
1

i doubt he was referring to only the city of 'rome' when he said "ancient Greece and Rome". The context is the clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 10:58 PM
2

ancient Greece and Rome They were talking about The roman empire
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 09:32 PM
2

Societies collapse because of decadence. It's not an inevitability, it's because leadership is weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 07:10 PM
3

Yeah, it's just a coincidence that Physicists have an average IQ of like... 130.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 03:58 PM
2

Greece, which is poor as shit, and Rome, which doesn't even exist anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 03:54 PM
4

that says nothing about intelligence since you can train anyone to be good on tests Yeah try training someone with an 85 IQ to get >1500 on the SAT's so they can go to the Ivy League. The SAT's correlate at .8 to IQ tests
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 02:15 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo5QNV__iBA People who score high on IQ are healthier, live longer, are more educated, make more money, etc. This is coming from Richard Haier who is a psychologist who specializes in intelligence and is the editor in chief of the journal intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 02:08 PM
0

they believe it’s in their interest to do so. "Believe" doing a lot of heavily lifting here. Even a society of high IQ people with few low IQ people, but the high IQ are aging out is creating problems for Singapore, see this essay about "IQ Shredders": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqVQ1kK-6Yk Now think about what happens with a society where Low IQ's far outnumber High IQ's AND it's aging out. That's the worst possible situation. The remaining high IQ people are going to get fucked in that so…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 01:53 PM
0

A society with few smart people and a lot of dumb people is a society that will collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 01:50 PM
-2

It's not smart, it's selfish. You could say it's a form of high time preference by the high IQ elite. They're basically causing dysgenics and making the future more miserable for themselves and the rest of society. If they were so smart, they'd realize that lowering IQ's is going to cause major problems in this country and they're going to feel the effects of it when they're older. We've been seeing a reverse Flynn effect since the early aughts: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 01:42 PM
-2

Domestic violence is socially unacceptable and illegal. Paternity fraud is accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 01:10 PM
-6

It's more the fact that paternity fraud isn't rare in france.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 12:23 PM
7

essentially that women can't be trusted Based on what we see in france where paternity tests are illegal, yeah they probably shouldn't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 11:58 AM

They mean conservative gender roles, not politics. Conservative gender roles ARE politics. Imagine if Trump said we need to bring back gender roles, MSNBC, CNN, NYTIMES and liberal women would melt down spectacularly. I'm sure soyboy 'men' would also be crying that they have to pick up the slack and actually lead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:23 AM

??????????? No i've never gotten sucker punched. It sounds like you're pro sucker punching, i don't even get your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 11:23 PM

Gosh, wonder why the mainstream media has this fixation about 'white supremacy' and 'nazis' being associated with lifting and combat sports https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/pandemic-fitness-trends-have-gone-extreme-literally-n1292463 https://time.com/6242949/exercise-industry-white-supremacy/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/gym-bros-more-likely-to-be-right-wing-assholes-science-confirms/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/27/do-you-boast-about-your-fitness-watch-out-yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:57 PM

He was getting interviewed on TV then got sucker punched, that's very different than 2 mutual groups of combatants fighting in the street. Use some common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 08:00 PM

Go to a UFC event, it's extraordinarily right leaning. Liberal 'men' are into running, biking, and yoga for exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:44 PM

And yet, whenever leftists get into fights, they get their asses handed to them, by like... one nazi chad who bulldozes multiple of them at a time https://x.com/MatchPoiint/status/1838541557365940720 Leftist 140 pound theater kids: "PUNCH A NAZI!" Then they actually have to do it and get wrecked by a 230 pound jacked proud boy Go to any DSA convention and it's weak dysgenic freaks who couldn't fight off a house cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NdE9CjkvTY&t=1s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:39 PM

And yet, whenever leftists get into fights, they get their asses handed to them, by like... one nazi chad who bulldozes multiple of them at a time https://x.com/MatchPoiint/status/1838541557365940720 Leftist 140 pound theater kids: "PUNCH A NAZI!" Then they actually have to do it and get wrecked by a 230 pound jacked proud boy Go to any DSA convention and it's weak dysgenic freaks who couldn't fight off a house cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NdE9CjkvTY&t=1s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:39 PM

And yet, whenever leftists get into fights, they get their asses handed to them, by like... one nazi chad who bulldozes multiple of them at a time https://x.com/MatchPoiint/status/1838541557365940720 Leftist 140 pound theater kids: "PUNCH A NAZI!" Then they actually have to do it and get wrecked by a 230 pound jacked proud boy Go to any DSA convention and it's weak dysgenic freaks who couldn't fight off a house cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NdE9CjkvTY&t=1s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 07:35 PM

https://nypost.com/2023/06/09/im-a-liberal-hard-to-find-progressive-masculine-men-to-date/ https://nypost.com/2021/07/10/why-progressive-women-want-to-date-men-who-act-conservative/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 05:15 PM

You know this how?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 04:38 PM

First you said, 6 figures and now you're saying $500k. What are you talking about. I'm saying you'll have a better chance finding a single man who is over 6 feet tall, makes $500k a year than fmind a liberal masculine man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 04:23 PM

Asking for a single man who is over 6 feet and makes $500k a year is probably more reasonable, statistically speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 04:03 PM

Do you think the whole fad with Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit, Cosmopolitan, etc. featuring fat models was aimed at communist revolutionaries? https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/01/07/08/37712104-9121533-image-a-6_1610008717553.jpg "This is healthy!"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:59 PM

If you have to lower standards for women, that's evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:37 PM

"Crazy conservatives" meaning people who don't think men should be competing in women's sports/using women's bathrooms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:24 PM

They literally did pogroms against jews, wtf are you even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:23 PM

Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view Low T = smaller muscles. Giving men T increases muscles without even going to the gym, based on randomized control trials.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:17 PM

Yeah i don't think your options are 'plenty' https://x.com/Halalcoholism/status/1756267938355790278
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:12 PM

Men were happy with that arrangment until feminists told the government to even shit out. The trad movement is asking society to go back to that arrangement (women staying at home).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:11 PM

Watch the video. If a rightwinger said you should go lift and learn martial arts, all the other rightwingers will vigorously agree. A leftwinger suggesting it: "HOW DARE YOU ARE ABLEliST/FATPHOBIC!" Edit: Love that one leftist who was afraid to leave the house because of covid, as to why he/she couldn't lift
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:06 PM

Conscientiousness is a rightwing big 5 personality trait, openness is a liberal big 5 personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:04 PM

This is one of my favorite things that went viral recently. A leftist was imploring other leftists to lift weights, strengthen their bodies and learn martial arts, ostensibly to prepare themselves against a war with the right: "A fascist worked out today, did you?" Guess what the replies to her were: https://x.com/Halalcoholism/status/1756267938355790278 The left celebrates weakness and learned helpelessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:03 PM

This is one of my favorite things that went viral recently. A leftist was imploring other leftists to lift weights, strengthen their bodies and learn martial arts, ostensibly to prepare themselves against a war with the right: "A fascist worked out today, did you?" Guess what the replies to her were: https://x.com/Halalcoholism/status/1756267938355790278 The left celebrates weakness and learned helpelessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:03 PM

You would take the gamble versus the doughy liberal guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:02 PM

This is one of my favorite things that went viral recently. A leftist was imploring other leftists to lift weights, strengthen their bodies and learn martial arts, ostensibly to prepare themselves against a war with the right: "A fascist worked out today, did you?" Guess what the replies to her were: https://x.com/Halalcoholism/status/1756267938355790278 The left celebrates weakness and learned helpelessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 03:01 PM

His face is covered because he doesn't want to be cancelled from society. The fact that he's jacked gives him a high probability of an aesthetic face. The liberal LOOKS older because he's fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:45 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GX3_HqOXUAAeJ4_?format=jpg&name=medium "oh baby, tell me more about karl marx while i feel up your non-existant biceps"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:41 PM

Who do you think women find more attractive? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GX3_HqOXUAAeJ4_?format=jpg&name=medium
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:39 PM

Sure you'll find soft rightwing guys. But men who lift, who do combat sports, etc. tilt far more to the right. Also, testosterone induces muscle growth. Low testosterone = low muscle mass. Guess what happens when you give low t liberal 'men' a shot of testosterone? https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats Besides that, even the liberal media agrees: 'gym bros' are all nazi assholes: https://www.vice.com/en/art…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:37 PM

Of course i answered. Basically women are delusional. A big part of the reason why marriage rates are cratering is because there's a 60/40 split in college attainment. If women can't get a college educated man with a good income, she'll stay single. And the ones who DO get married still think they got a raw deal because she thinks she could have gotten an even better man (based on all the men she slept with in the past) and that she's still 'the prize'.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:34 PM

https://www.vice.com/en/article/gym-bros-more-likely-to-be-right-wing-assholes-science-confirms/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/27/do-you-boast-about-your-fitness-watch-out-youll-unavoidably-become-rightwing https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/pandemic-fitness-trends-have-gone-extreme-literally-n1292463 https://time.com/6242949/exercise-industry-white-supremacy/ Walk around NYC, it's soy central.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:32 PM

It's subtle. Before government enforced equality and technology ruined everything, biology and mate choice matched. So Men married down, women married up. Men still marry down and women still marry up, but because of unnatural equality and technology, from the point of the women, she feels she's giving up way too much in what she wants in a man and it's the opposite: She's marrying down or (at best equally) while he's getting the prize (her), even if, for example, the man makes more money has a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:29 PM

Women settle harder, because your list of demands are much higher. Men marry down, women marry up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:22 PM

Look, i live near NYC and the overwhelming majority of 'men' look like they've never lifted a dumbell or barbell in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:21 PM

Eh, not a main point of contention of my argument. I guess i'm in the 'big city' bubble and everyone i know has a passport and travels.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:16 PM

Read the comments of the video, it's not 'humor'.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:12 PM

Nothing is ever absolute. We're talking heuristics. There's a reason why Donald Trump can show his face around UFC events. This particular picture illustrates what i'm talking about: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GX3_HqOXUAAeJ4_?format=jpg&name=medium (A spanish rightwing nationalist, who has to hide his identity for obvious reasons, debating a spanish liberal). It's like Bronze Age Pervert having a debate with one of the Chapo Traphouse "men" The jokes write themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:06 PM

It's a weapon because women depend on equality of outcomes, not equality of opportunity. Look at all the affirmative action women get. Just look at tech: you can get into big tech as a woman with far fewer qualification than men do. Look at all the scholarships for women, but having male only scholarships would be a scandal. White women were/are the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 06:32 PM
6

Good example of flirting: https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/663/485/1f8.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 03:39 PM
8

it has been studied that better GPA at admission is highly correlated with higher chance of actually finishing college. GPA doesn't mean shit anymore. It's been inflated to hell all across the country for the past few years. That's why the elite schools had to bring back the SAT's/ACT, they were admitting students with high GPA's but no SAT/ACT scores and they were failing at higher rates than the kids who submitted SAT/ACT scores.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 02:31 PM
1

It's only in contemporary times, and perhaps partially due to the complaints of the manosphere, that Blue Pillers are starting to say that men do have to put in improvement work in order to attract women. Harsh realities started to settle in for blue pillers, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 05:00 PM
2

They're called 'polycules' in the tech scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 03:04 PM
3

To quote Curtis Yarvin: "Cthulhu may swim slowly. But he only swims left. Isn’t that interesting?" Notice how elites (especially on the west coast) are trying to normalize polyamory now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 02:22 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ffjalb/women_complaining_from_not_getting_approached/lmx2agy/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 01:20 PM
7

It absolutely is. When you put all the responsibility on men for initiating and also say approaching women is creepy (#mEtOo) what the fuck do you expect. Men don't want to approach because men know women/society have contradictory standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:41 PM
41

Women are just one big kafka trap and want to hold men to impossible contradictory standards. When women say men should just approach, they're saying: 1) We BETTER find you attractive 2) If we don't, i'm going to put you on blast on social media When ALL responsibility for initiating is put on men, you basically have the ability to make unreasonable standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:39 PM
4

context is the most important part of the discussion 1) Be attractive 2) Read minds 3) Hope the woman isn't a psychotic dumbass who will chew you out for trying That's the context.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:34 PM
16

Post the Me Too Movement Nah, this has been a thing even before Me Too. Me Too just accelerated it. women are more vocal about unwanted attention from men, setting boundaries, and shaming men who are perceived to be crossing them unwated attention from men (UNATTRACTIVE MEN you mean).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:32 PM
15

Despite the fact that there’s nothing stopping her from approaching the guys she likes, and statically, she’ll have a much higher success rate of landing dates than the average male. There's a semi-viral X thread by a woman who wrote an article about men wasting women's fertility years by turning them into 'forever girlfriends' https://x.com/CartoonsHateHer/status/1834229989304086576 Women approaching men 'they like' are either going to turn into harem girls or 'forever girlfriends', pretty much…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:26 PM
4

If you date two south Asian first gen individuals and have similar bad experiences lmao if you think this happens with any frequency
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 11:48 PM
8

Speed dating is equivalent to OLD. Hey guess what's dominating dating these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:45 PM

I mean, do you want someone who is just selfish and discards all social conventions, is manipulative, has 0 regard for your needs? The fact that i have to explain this to you is remarkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:24 PM

Someone who only cares about himself and will take what he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 10:24 PM

In fact, being a bad man is statistically linked to being more attractive to women https://x.com/robkhenderson/status/1390442237083930629
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 09:29 PM

I don't see what that has to do with it, the one child policy was a top down authoritarian government policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 06:05 PM

China had super high birth rates (like 6 kids per woman) around the transition from Mao's to Deng's time. Essentially women were ok staying at home when men were working themselves to the bone and food/resources were scarce. Now that we have air conditioned offices that are full of email jobs, women are like, 'nah'. Modernity/feminism is going to destroy society.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 05:40 PM
8

What's the saying, a lie can travel half the world before the truth even has a chance to put its shoes on? People are still citing that one debunked paper. Unbelievable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 04:57 AM
6

I mean, from my POV, at least you get some attention, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:31 PM

You know the pill and other contraceptives didn't exist since the beginning of time, right? Most men never got to fuck. For most of history, reproducing and fucking were synonymous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:20 AM

finally equalizing between the genders What are you smoking, most men in history never had a chance to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:15 AM

If men weren’t so thirsty, they’d be just as discriminating as women If men weren't so thirsty, humanity would've gone extinct a long ass time ago. Actually most species would have gone extinct a long ass time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:13 AM
2

Yeah, watch marriage rates plummet. Y'all realize that social security/medicare are going to go insolvent faster when men don't trust women and are reluctant to get married and have kids, right? Lookup 'inverted population pyramid', you people are literally destroying society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 04:22 AM
1

Eh, i've taken a DNA test, i have no real risk of genetic diseases. Plus i lift, do a lot of cardio and eat relatively healthy. If anything, i should be getting an insurance break compared to all the fatass dysgenic freaks in this country.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 02:28 AM
1

I would prefer that than raising someone else's kid. Infinitely more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:10 PM
3

Oh yeah, that'll go well. "Hey honey, i want to get a paternity test" "Why, don't you trust me?" "no it's just..." SCREAM SCREAM SCREAM SCREAM SCREAM DIVORCE The whole point of a mandatory paternity test is to remove this problem. Also, it would incentivize fidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:09 PM
1

They're women with motivated reasoning. And as a gynocentric society, we cater to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:08 PM
4

Some women like a guy who makes at least $100k, some women like a man who makes at least $200k 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:08 PM
5

Average men get unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:42 PM
7

OP is right, some women prefer men who are taller than 6'... some want men who are at least 6'4"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:41 PM
6

The accused is not guilty legally. Doesn't mean he's not in fact the criminal. By that standard, everyone could be guilty of being a rapist even if there's no current evidence against him.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:01 PM
3

just know this is not the majority of feminists being like this. just the very loud few. as far as im aware most feminists actually want equality and arent like the feminists you talk about. Please stop gaslighting us. Just in this thread, people are arguing against due process just because these are college cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:00 PM
11

Look i'm a patriots fan who followed Tom's Career even when he moved to the Bucs. She quit on Tom because he wanted one more year of football, which is a fucking insane thing to do. Tom's SMV is off the charts (good looking, greatest football player of all time, rich as hell, from all accounts, a really good dad), and she quit on him because he wanted to work just ONE more year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:54 AM
4

but has encountered a lot of men who only want to have sex with her without the commitment Here's what's happening: She tried to tie down men who were more attractive than her. Those men leveraged their high SMV into casual sex with her. That's her own fault. She's only interested in LTR's with her looksmatch, not hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:50 AM
5

Then why even keep them as superficial friends? You obviously get something out of them if you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 07:06 PM
3

You don't trust any of them, but yet you keep them on as male friends. Let me guess, they do shit like help you move your stuff to new apartments and drive you to the airport without you complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:17 PM
1

The pills and the whole alpha/beta stuff are the male equivalent of women who get fixated on astrology. I'm pretty sure lifting weights/getting in shape does shit for you while astrology doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:39 PM
2

His TV/Netflix career was on an upswing. Standup is about all he can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:16 PM
2

Aziz Ansari didn't even rape anyone and he got cancelled for what was essentially a bad date.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 09:17 PM
7

You ain't nothin' but a hound dog Quit snoopin' 'round my door You can wag your tail But I ain't gonna feed you no more[12] The song was written for a woman to sing in which she berates "her selfish, exploitative man",[13] and in it she "expresses a woman's rejection of a man – the metaphorical dog in the title" So the hound dog is the man. I must be missing the part about the song that degrades women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 03:02 AM
1

"I think every person who disagrees with me is ugly" is not a debatable topic. It's called motivated reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 03:00 AM
5

So, i don't read romance novels, but i have a hard time believing the men in these novels are talking about how women are garbage and beneath them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:59 AM
7

WOW, that's almost as mysognistic as "Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks / Lick on these nuts and suck the dick." - Snoop Dogg SAID NOONE EVER
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:39 AM
16

yeah, no shit musicians get groupies all the time. If you have a modicum of talent and can perform you'll get some attention. I think it's not just the fact that musicians can get groupies, but that rappers can treat women like complete garbage, and it's even reflected in their lyrics, that they can still get a ton of women to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:34 AM
1

a mere one dozen women LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO How do people post this nonsense and think they can get away with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:33 AM
2

Elvis was talking about hoes in a degrading way?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:32 AM
5

What people are upset is that high status men can be mysoginistic as hell and get laid like crazy while the guy who puts in effort and is respectful of women can get nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:31 AM

Large numbers of women are dating the same smaller number of men. This is why there are "are we dating the same guy" facebook groups for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 11:28 AM
5

A chad who screws hundreds of women off tinder isn't going to give a shit. Who is going to 'find out'? Also, if i had a friend who racked up a high bodycount but didn't satisfy any of them, you think i'm going to make fun of him? This is the problem, women don't think like men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:57 AM
7

As long as it comes with pleasing the woman as well. If he can't, he's in a worse position than before sleeping with her. Having the reputation that you can't please a woman isn't a flex. It's ammo for mockery. Ok this is insane solipsim. If a chad is pumping and dumping lots of chicks, why would he care?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:17 AM
2

I went to portugal last month, it was a night and day difference between that country and America. The women were slim, beautiful, and pleasant. The women are actually way more approachable. I don't even know how the fuck American women can have the attitude they have when so many of them are hambeasts. If i weren't married i would have stayed there lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:17 AM
3

It's a confluence of factors. If you're tall (like 6'2" and over), even having a somewhat busted face doesn't matter because height is rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:11 PM
0

rooted in misandry I wouldn't say it's rooted in misandry, it's rooted in cold self interest. The problem is that society doesn't shame women so we accept this type of behavior from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:02 AM
3

Nope, i've been lifting (and boxing) for years now, the difference is night and day when i started out. I'm a married man and i don't go flirting around with women, but i've had some women flirt with me, before i was kinda invisible. I don't even do shit like go out shirtless or flaunt my body, but clothes fit me VERY well. Having broad shoulders, larger lats and a v-taper helps immensely. I'm not even a 'roided up bodybuilder or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 10:56 AM

Low value men don't expect high value women. The shit i hear from low value women in their expectations blows my mind though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:32 PM
5

is indeed working for most people Is it really though?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 12:46 AM
33

helps enforce accountability for reality. Does it really? There's an old saying that "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" I feel like a lot of women can remain irrational longer than they can viably catch a realistic long term partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 12:43 AM
3

There was a psychologist on twitter who was explaining why women in the inner city might want to be with an abusive man: that man can still protect her from extraordinarily dangerous men in her community, so she'll put up with it. The abuse might indicate violence necessary to scare other men from hurting her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:24 AM
5

They're just trying to date regular guys. "Regular guys" aren't pumping and dumping these ladies, don't be ridiculous. "Regular guys" don't act like that because they have few options and are desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 11:33 PM

Consummate sociopathy is not an answer to anything having to do with people. That's why dating is such a hellscape now. People with dark triad traits have higher sexual success though. Women reward that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:13 PM
9

even worse than drug dealers ... drug dealers have great track records for dating
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:39 PM
2

I mean, have you seen pictures of your average reddit man at reddit meetups? Reddit is a negative selection, not a random sample of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:59 PM
7

College-educated South Korean men know how to politicize and weaponize the male loneliness epidemic far more effectively than going on shooting rampages. I think this only happened because of how insanely unfair the forced conscription is in South Korea. The MRM in the US would be a lot stronger if the US had forced conscription like SK. The US only requires you to sign up for selective service.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:02 PM
6

Nerds are good at systematizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:00 PM
4

its very easy to imagine a (high paid) jock is insecure about people (especially women) with academic jobs lol It's really not. This is an imaginary thing you just made up in your head. High paid jocks have their pick of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:04 AM
3

A higher male to female would predict more LTR's/monogamous behavior. This is what we see on college campuses with high male to female ratios. With the opposite, you see hookup culture skyrocket.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:36 AM
7

A higher male to female would predict more LTR's/monogamous behavior. This is what we see on college campuses with high male to female ratios. With the opposite, you see hookup culture skyrocket.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:35 AM

Is there a correlation to neuroticism and IQ? Low socioeconomic class women create criminals though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:19 AM

This is not what we wanted As a happily married man, i'm giving fewer shits about what young modern women want these days. High IQ feminist women have absolutely moronic opinions just to shit on men, propagate said moronic opinions to eveyrone else (like this shit) via social media, live a highly individualistic lifestyle, don't reproduce, and letting the low IQ women pick up these moronic ideas and reproduce at a much higher rate. This shit is causing idiocracy to come true. Society is dysgenic…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:02 PM
10

Right, so what's your complaint?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 10:45 AM
13

Because we've been fed so much bullshit from feminists since the 60's about how men and women are the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:42 AM
0

This is just so dumb i don't know wear to start Your own ideology would be a good start. The complaints of feminists isn't about "DV" or "Gender Roles". Feminism is a luxury belief. When the SK government starts requiring women to sacrifice for their country like they do for men, we can start talking. Progress in gender equality isn't a zero sum game. Improving the lives of women doesn't need to be held back because in another area men lives are. It is with feminists. That ideology is literally …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:34 PM
-1

Feminists are not responsible for the draft. Conservative ideal and traditional gender roles are responsible for the draft. No, having a psychopathic neighbor who is constantly threatening to level your country with nukes and artillery fire is responsible for the draft. The draft didn't happen in a vacuum. Feminists should stfu when their very existence could be wiped out due to the North Koreans. This is caused is capitalism not feminism It's either that or starvation to death with communism. R…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:50 AM
4

... WHAT babies? Their TFR is .7 They've had low TFR for a REALLY long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:32 AM
2

And gratitude. How would they show it? By sleeping with men? Is that what you want? Where did i say that? Feminism in SK is antagonistic to men. That's why i say SK isn't worth defending anymore. Just let NK invade.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:30 AM
3

So what, just leave South Korea unprotected then? Or maybe they should be conscripting women to even it out. Maybe South Korean women should show a bit more gratitude that their men are putting their lives on their line to defend the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:14 AM
5

Not really. If feminists admitted they're a supremacist movement, i wouldn't be complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:25 PM
6

Because feminism is a duplicitous movement. Feminists say they're about 'equality' when they are more like a supremacist movement. I would respect feminists more if they stopped pretending to be about 'equality'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:12 PM
5

"We don't need men's rights movements because feminism already covers equality between the sexes" whenever feminists claim the mens rights movement doesn't need to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:41 PM
5

Which is why feminists are putting so much effort into removing it, said no one ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:42 PM
12

And yet America still has the selective service system for men in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:39 PM
45

I want to know how feminism is even a fucking thing in a country where young men are forcibly conscripted against their will for years while women get a free pass. That and their culture of overwork. How much responsibility can you put on men before they just say 'fuck it' and rebel? At this rate, North Korea will just be able to walk across the border and conquer South Korea with their demographic collapse. If I were a south korean man, i'd just let them take it, the country isn't worth defendi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:24 PM
33

Monogamy is the norm. Not for marriage it isn't lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:39 PM
1

Women have options. 60% of college grads are women, 40% are men. I think we're overstating this wrt to LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:53 PM

"Not statistically meaningful" would be more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 07:38 PM

The economy prospers with women in the workplace. It's mostly beneficial. Not sure this is true, long term. The anti-natalism of women in the workplace is going to wreck economies around the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:58 PM

some women are cool with the stay at home husband thing) This is not a thing most women are into.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:57 PM

Oh that's cute you think it's just men who won't participate in this scheme of yours. The other problem is that the overwhelming majority of women would find a man being a 'house husband' beneath them and disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:56 PM
-2

Most women have NO TROUBLE snagging any men 60% of college graduates are women, 40% are men. Women want men who are at least on 'her level'. If men who are college graduates are going outside of the country for sex/relationships, that makes the skew even worse. Explain to me how women are having 'no trouble' here. Speaking as a married man in a white collar job w/ a graduate degree, i've had cute highly educated women flirt with me. If i wasn't married, it'd be easy for ME not... not for women o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:08 AM

He's estimating his self respect correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:53 PM

So what, he should just live a lie then?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:44 PM

It's pretty insane how women try to gaslight men on this, because if most men knew the truth, more men would just opt out of society and marriage would plummet even further. Women need to keep up the big lie in order to keep society from falling apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:44 PM

Yeah such a common occurrence
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:11 PM

Yeah how's that working for Germany then if it's so dumb?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 07:47 PM

The chick who denuclearized germany and made germany dependent on russian energy? LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 07:44 PM
-1

Yes? Leftwing activism is basically upper middle class white politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:09 PM
2

Yeah but you just have to move to a city (most americans live in cities), the more progressive the city, the better. If you're trans and living in more rural/conservative areas, you're doing it wrong. You'll have upper middle class/rich activists in the palm of your hands. People have been fired for misgendering and schools have been kicked out of statewide sports leagues for not wanting to compete against transgirls. If you say the wrong thing, you can have a bunch of activists torching your bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:39 PM
1

Norah Vincent is stunning and brave, deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:04 PM
9

Yep, biological girls who want to transition really need to be counseled on the isolation they're going to feel when they become a man. A lot of men are able to deal with being invisible, but a lot aren't (although it seems the ones who can 'deal with it' just anesthetize themselves with video games and porn). There was this viral video of a trans man who was devastated about how isolated and invisible he felt after transitioning: https://www.tiktok.com/@cam2timesx/video/7249319396739386666 Mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:28 PM

The population of the planet continues to go up Aka humans are living longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:24 PM

Do you people not know what happens when you have an inverse population pyramid? Say goodbye to your social security/medicare schemes and governments will go bankrupt. If you want to see what social disorder looks like, look no further.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:23 PM
7

Men and women are different... Feminists have been shoving down everyone's throats that men and women are the same and equality equality equality equality equality equality equality equality equality equality equality equality something something more equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:59 PM
33

People realizing that feminists are motte and bailey hypocrits, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:58 PM
8

I share a car w/ my wife, we eat together. Saves time too (only 1 person needs to cook, we pool our laundry together, etc.). Also, compatability, i've had nightmare roomates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 01:17 AM
2

how is feminism not egalitarian Why hello motte and bailey, we meet again
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 12:52 AM
4

With how expensive housing is, how the hell is being single a better economic choice than being married? If eveyrone got married, not only would housing cost less for THOSE 2 people, but housing supply would drop nationwide which would further make housing even affordable because there would be an oversupply of housing and prices would plummet. If everyone stayed single, housing costs would EXPLODE. Marriage makes more economic sense (even if you don't decide to have kids) on both a micro and ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 12:52 AM
1

But in general, women score higher on neuroticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 12:43 AM
2

True, but neuroticism is higher in women than men. Much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 12:38 AM
2

Feminism changed social norms with respect to sex and relationships which had a massive impact on things like out of wedlock children which had an impact on a lot of societal ills like crime
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:11 PM
2

... you can look at societal dysfunction that has happened slowly after the 60's that has culminated into major dysfunction now?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 03:11 PM
1

I used to be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 05:34 PM
1

You forget that progressives like to virtue signal. One of the reasons why they won't admit to it, because in the back of their mind, there's also a racial undertone to the single parent/dual parent discussion, so saying 2 parent households is superior has some 'racist' undertones to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 05:32 PM
1

My reply is an account from Psychologist and author, Rob Henderson, who grew up bouncing around foster homes as a kid but miraculously went to Yale and talking to upper middle class progressive kids there from 2 parent households who have these stupid ideas like 'defund the police' and '2 parent households aren't necessary'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 05:21 PM
3

It's really about the sons. Boys without a father figure become criminals because they badly need role models. Girls can just sit quietly and learn in school because girls because k-12 is structurered around girls (not boys), see the dwindling number of male teachers and curriculum aimed and girls instead of boys. This is why fathers are important. Single mothers raise defective boys who have no impulse control, no model of manhood. That's why single mothers create criminals. Feminism is a destr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 05:18 PM
3

Why yes, i am a huge fan of Rob Henderson's work :) I'm reading his new book, Troubled, which is fantastic btw. Hard to imagine someone being able to come on top when you're born to a drug addicted mother and bounced around from foster home to foster home and doing drugs at 9 years old, but apparently his IQ is very high and got lucky by joining the military and getting his life in order.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:49 PM
1

They're also statistically insignificant compared to married women and single mothers who are single mothers because they're your typical irresponsible woman who becomes a single mother. That's like talking about your average school and looking at the population of students who are 150 IQ and above as representative of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:39 PM
1

Single mother by choice usually have the funds to be able to raise up a child on their own. lmao, who the hell chooses to be single mothers? That's an insanely small % of women. Women with money tend to be highly educated and highly educated women with children are overwhelmingly married.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:28 PM
1

Does it account for single women by choice or just by chance? Does it matter? Women collectively said no to patriarchal sexual norms of no sex before marriage. It was a collective choice to destroy society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:20 PM
1

I hope they eventually abolish this for men watches NK invade SK Yeah careful what you wish for.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:17 PM
1

Men are asking too much and offering too little. SK is sexist against women. Also, SK enslaves young men with forced conscription so that NK doesn't invade SK. Imagine if men just said, 'fuck it' with regards to conscription and just let NK invade. I imagine this attitude of 'men are asking too much and offering too little' by women would suddenly go 180 degrees and women will beg men to protect them from Kim Jong Un's savagery. KJU might not even have to invade, seems like SK feminists are hell…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:15 PM
-1

We're not native americans living in tribes. We have cities, suburbs, etc. that are not conducive to having a community raising a child. The nuclear family worked extraordinarily well given the physical structure of society. Now, if you want to go back to living in caves and teepees, there might be communal societies you can go to, but i highly doubt highly educated women with high material demands want to live in such places.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:08 PM
1

Single mothers create criminals. That affects everyone. Is the sacrifice of so much personal freedom worth the societal benefit of a few kids having a little less childhood emotional pain to deal with? Wanna know part of the reason why housing is so unaffordable? It's because people want to get away from high crime areas caused by teenagers from single mothers creating mayhem, everyone goes into the same safe upper middle class suburbs and drive up housing costs. This actually causes a feedback …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 04:02 PM
2

Statistically speaking, 2 parent households and single father households produce the least number of criminals (they're actually statistically tied). Single mothers are the ones who produce the most number of criminals. Your anecdote means nothing to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:44 PM
-2

Everyone knows a 2 parent family is best for a child. Go to Harvard or Yale (or any college campus really) and ask your typical student (who comes from a 2 parent household) if a 2 parent household is superior to single motherhood. The overwhelming majority would disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:35 PM
1

This doesn't solve the problem of single motherhood (creating societal dysfunction).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:25 PM
0

Divorce rates for first marriages have been significantly improving for years now. That's because marriage rates have cratered, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:04 PM
-9

i think everybody who is a reasonable person agrees to this. Feminism doesn't work on logic, reason, and facts, that's the problem. Feminism only cares about the immediate wants/gratification of women, things like 2nd, 3rd, 4th order effects on society is not their concern. Nuclear families is 'patriarchy' or something and marriage is an attempt by men to enslave women, last time i debated this topic with feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:09 PM
-2

The rates of working class marriages and middle class/upper class marriages were the same until the late 60's after feminism became a thing and women started working. Working class marriages have tanked since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 01:53 PM
4

Statistically, Single Mothers basically create criminals. Single fathers produce children with the same crime rates as 2 parent households: https://www.mnpsych.org/index.php%3Foption%3Dcom_dailyplanetblog%26view%3Dentry%26category%3Dindustry%2520news%26id%3D54 Family structure and the lack of paternal involvement are predictive of juvenile delinquency. The more opportunities a child has to interact with his or her biological father, the less likely he or she is to commit a crime or have contact …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:45 PM
10

You're asking men to work in jobs that corporations use easily exploited immigrants for. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 08:53 PM
8

When it represents women's interests at the expense of men, women magically become quite agreeable with each other. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 06:40 PM
6

Hear means he was a very skilled communicator. Wasn't there a study that showed that people don't really read the bios? If you're just swiping hundreds of people at a time, who would even have time to read all the bios? If he's conventially attractive i can see women stopping to read up on him AFTER they look at his pics. You could have an olympic gold medal and nobel prize, but if you're ugly, nobody would even know because they'd skip over you after taking a 2 second look at your pics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 06:18 PM
2

Incels could cure their problems with prostitutes, but they don't because a lot of them want real relationships rather than just a meatbag to have fun with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:17 PM

I'm not gonna sugar coat it. If you're truly ugly, you're fucked. But, if you're hot and an asshole, you won't keep a good woman for long. No one in their sane mind can't stand the dismissiveness and abuse, no matter how hot the other person is. A lot of hot guys don't care. In terms of evolutionary psychology, they're fulfilling their biological imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 04:52 PM
11

At least that child is yours and you have the same investment. For a step-child? Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 03:16 PM

I have no interest in lying on here - I'm anonymous, what would be the point. I'm also not interested in downvotes/upvotes It's because if you have a feminist bent, and people are criticizing women in general, that gives you motivated reasoning. It has nothing to do with you, personally, but making sure the sisterhood doesn't get a black eye. Actually, it's not even feminism, women have a strong in-group bias as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:37 PM
2

Oh sweet summer child, you think HVM care about that shit? They like having lots of options to play with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 07:02 PM
1

In the overwhelming majority of cases, it's women aiming too high and the men not taking the women seriously because he has a lot of side chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 06:28 PM
2

Yeah rating women on physical attraction is totally like how they tattoo'd numbers on holocaust victims I cannot roll my eyes far back enough at your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:09 PM
-2

That's you punishing the blonde girl due to having the context of the video which creates a cognitive bias against her. The 2 girls who rated the blonde girl a 10 didn't have the context, so they had no reason to be upset at her for violating the 'sisterhood' code.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:33 PM
0

She's quite attractive, sorry, most men are going to agree. And so are most women (who aren't biased by the context of the video)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:29 PM
2

Show me which one. Again, it appears women are imprinting their own neuroticism on me, i'm not the one proudly saying i'm going to protest the 10 point scale to trigger other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:26 PM
-1

They seem very close to the same level They're not close. The problem is, people here got emotional about what the blonde did, so they're going to penalize her. The 2 girls rated the blonde a 10, that is an overrate (not wildly so), but they aren't emotional about it because they didn't hear what either the brunette said or the blonde said or what people in this thread said, so they weren't prepped with the same cognitive biases the audience has.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:00 PM
1

She's within that range, personally i rate her an 8. She's not wildy overrating herself. The 2 girls rated her a 10. Sorry, but she's very attractive. Your personal bias of her calling the first girl a 6 or 5 is clouding your judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:54 PM
-1

It’s the “better than” attitude than women don’t like. Right, proving the thesis that women enforced false equality overtly. She’s not not that much better looking than that brunette realistically speaking, her facial features are not particularly stunning. She absolutely is more attractive. The 2 girls after rated her a 10 (i don't think she's that high, but she's more attractive than the 1st girl, relatively speaking, and that's not scandalous to say)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:51 PM
3

Men don't collectively rate themselves as '10' in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:50 PM
0

Not even. Their attractiveness is too far apart for there to be a sizeable minority. The overwhelming majority will say the blonde is more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:20 PM
3

The women of ppd would have you believe that i'm seething with rage, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:11 PM
1

Yes, women will kneecap each other covertly. But overtly, there's a pretense of sisterhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:34 PM
2

Please post where i got emotional in either thread. Women are literally saying they are protesting the 10 scale system. People who get emotional protest. I'm just pointing out logical inconsistencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:33 PM
2

Take 1000 random men and they will say the blonde is more attractive, on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:32 PM
3

Would you like to show me a post in made in either thread that shows that i'm emotional? Whereas women here are literally saying they're protesting the ranking system. People don't protest if they don't feel emotional about something.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:31 PM
0

Absolutely. But i can't gauge her entire personality on that alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:30 PM
3

But if I did look like Lizzo (we have the same birthday) why would it affect you if I said I was pretty lmao Because men are logical creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:29 PM
0

She said 5 or 6. I think she's a 6, 5 is underrating, but not 'crazy'. but I think a significant minority of people would view the brunette as more attractive. This is actual delusion The blonde is not a 9, at least not in the US. She's said 8.5 which is a fair assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:02 PM
0

Sorry, but this isn't confidence, it's delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:53 PM
1

We're just talking about looks. It's impossible to really know a person's personality without extensive amount of time. In terms of looks, the overwhelming majroity of men would rate the blonde higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:52 PM
1

I don't get emotional about the subject, unlike the women here or in the tiktok comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:51 PM
1

A lot of guys like the idea of beating each other up but would never do it because punching has consequences. No we don't actually. Being injured sucks. As someone who dabbles in boxing (but rarely spars) A lot of guys enjoy seeing women get shit on but would never do it themselves because that too has consequences. You're imprinting your neuroticism on us.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:50 PM
2

Because of reddit's overwhelming demographic. Like, aboriginals would be irrelevant to this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:47 PM
3

You seem quite motivated to uncover.....something Human psychology fascinates me. What harm is done by women on a cringe worthy TikTok video (who are these men and why do women play along at all?) saying they're 10s? Give me a real world harmful event you see happening as a result. A better question is what happens if they deviate from the 'all 10's' narrative: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1bfgf1m/followup_to_the_all_women_are_10s_discussion_how/kv04v7w/ The underlying psych…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:45 PM
1

That's like saying men enjoy beating the shit out of each other because they like watching boxing or mma.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:41 PM
2

She is, because this isn't a thing in western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:37 PM
1

Yeah... you really do, heh https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1beq2he/daily_community_chat_megathread/kuziop3/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:33 PM
4

They do it for clicks. Men don't normally ask women this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:31 PM
0

She lost points with me. The Blonde gained points with me because she was realistic about her own looks and didn't overinflate her ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:27 PM
3

Go back to my prior video from yesterday. The women who rated themselves a 10 got a negative reaction from men. The girl who rated herself a 6.7 got positive reactions from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:23 PM
6

People can get carried away with the toxic positivity, but trust me: this hyper-competitive backbiting is just men with low self-esteem seeing how people with higher self-esteem think and freaking the fuck out. Sorry, but the 6.7 girl had the highest self esteem. The self proclaimed 10's have the lowest self esteem, that's why they overinflated themselves. The 6.7 is the most mentally stable/mentally comfortable one out of the entire group.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:22 PM
6

Ranking things is very useful. Otherwise we would just do random shit. When i buy a car, i rank which ones i like better than others. When i wanted to date women, i rank their looks and personalities and possibile futures with them, when i go to the gym, i rank which exercises are the most beneficial to me. How do you even get through life without ranking things constantly? This has more to do with female neuroticism about being ranked by other men than anything else. I don't play videogames any…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:21 PM
0

You're absolutely wrong about that. Men don't do the same thing because we're hierarchical by nature and don't have emotional breakdowns about our looks, at least compared to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:18 PM
6

Boy, this issue sure touched you. Again, i think you're trying to imprint female fragility onto me and other men, it hasn't touched me emotionally at all. Switch genders and have men rating other men other than 10, and men wouldn't give a shit. Men and women are different. That's the takeaway from all of this. Men don't break down and cry because another man didn't say he's the most handsome man in the universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:16 PM
5

No, we literally like to rank shit, everything from women to sports teams to individual athletes to how powerful our favorite video game characters are to which weight lifting technique produces the best results (literally just watch a back exercise video ranking S tier to F tier back exercises the other day). You don't know what you're talking about, men are hierarchical, women are more based on equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:11 PM
8

Nobody's looking to 'humble' you asking where you rank yourself. I think you need to stop imprinting your neuroticism on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:06 PM
9

The replies to the video and also my thread yesterday where the women were incredulous that a girl ranked herself a 6.7 (thus making their own '10' self ranking look LUDICROUS) says otherwise. There absolutely an unspoken rule among women to enforce (fake) equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:02 PM
1

You're comparing a video to generate clicks and revenue to what men do everyday of their lives. We don't normally go up to women and ask them to rank themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:00 PM
4

Because men like to rank thinks and think in hierarchies. Sorry this makes you upset?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:59 PM
2

The reactions to both my threads show you that even older women get upset at this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:58 PM
3

What's not healthy is having your day ruined just because people don't think you're the prettiest thing alive. I used to be overweight, someone called me fat, and i didn't care because i have mental resiliency. Also i had motivation to lose weight. If i had the mentality of calling myself 'hot', i might not have had the motivation to lose weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:57 PM
3

Some men desperately want women to see themselves as ugly and it's weird. Sorry but you're just making this up. WHen some troll said margot robbie is 'mid', pretty much the entire internet called him out for being an idiot. What's weird is you making something up because of women looking really neurotic about this particular topic so you feel the need to even the score by calling out men on some imaginary failing that doesn't exist outside of trolling for reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:49 PM
5

They're literally saying they're sad or angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:47 PM
5

and shouldn't be seen as something else. Considering the reactions, nah, women are really hung up on their looks and making sure women don't accidentally reveal the truth about each others looks https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1bfgf1m/followup_to_the_all_women_are_10s_discussion_how/kv04v7w/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:42 PM
2

I've never asked a woman to rate herself, and i've never heard a man ask a woman to rate themselves. The men asking women to rate themselves are doing it for a) a discussion and b) clicks to generate views to generate $$$ for the videos they made. This isn't a thing that men do, sorry if you thought otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:41 PM
10

ranting and raging Nobody was ranting and raging. Compare that to the actual reactions to the video: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1bfgf1m/followup_to_the_all_women_are_10s_discussion_how/kv04v7w/ Sorry, but we're just not emotional about this issue like women are, you're trying to imprint female emotions onto men. I mean, yeah do i think women who do the 'all women are 10's and i'm a 10' thing are dumb? Yes. Are my feathers 'ruffled'? LMAO, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:40 PM
7

It's not really a confidence boost, it's delusion masking insecurity and also due to the external enforcement by the 'sisterhood' to ensure the compliance to the unspoken rules (never rate other women publicly less than a 10).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:36 PM
1

Some select comments i copied/pasted: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1bfgf1m/followup_to_the_all_women_are_10s_discussion_how/kv04v7w/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:33 PM
6

for the sake of watching dudes get their tail feathers all ruffled I think you're way overestimating how much you're going to get a man upset at you calling yourself a 10. When i used to be overweight, someone once called me fat and i said, yeah, i am... and it didn't ruin my day. Why would you think that you overrating yourself affect an average man in any way? I think you're trying to imprint how women think onto men, we just don't think like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:29 PM
3

Cool, sounds like you probably identify with how she looks. Perhaps you have some resemblance to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:27 PM
2

Apologies for making you so upset and angry. But now i understand you better.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:25 PM
2

Women collectively call lizzo beautiful/hot. It's not about insulting you, it's about exposing your hypocrisy and broken logic. Lizzo wouldnt fuck you either btw Sorry, but i'm married to a woman that's infinitely more attractive than lizzo. You're assuming i would even want to be intimate with lizzo when i find her revolting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:24 PM
2

Seeing your post on r/vindicta, i can see why my thread on women publicly claiming themselves to be 10's affected you so much and why you were angry at me. Condolences, must be tough for a woman to go through that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:20 PM
0

If a guy I thought looked really average called himself a 8, or whatever 10 even, why would I care? If a burger king assistant fry cook called himself rich while he was trying to get with you, you'd laugh in his face.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:13 PM
1

A man telling an average looking woman that she's beautiful means a lot more than a man telling a beautiful woman she's beautiful (because she's reminded multiple times a day every day by society).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:54 PM
2

It's healthy and beneficial to overrate your self, that's why evolution made this the dominant way of thinking about yourself. I don't think it is. When i was overweight and a 4, i knew i was below average. That encouraged me to go to the gym like 5-6 days a week and eat healthier. I'm more like a 6-7 now. If i thought of myself as a 10, i would have never improved due to delusion or just being happy being mediocre.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:46 PM
2

That was a hypothetical. I could shorten it: "Do you think lizzo is hot?" ... "Yes" ... "Cool, i think you look like lizzo"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:23 PM
3

Well yeah, i got in shape. I have a great IRL personality, that's why my previous fat ass was able to snag an attractive woman ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:45 AM
5

What does Sydney Sweeney have to do with me being a 10? Because statistically speaking, it's highly unlikely you're a 10 (i'm not asking you to show me a picture, i'm just saying, a random woman has a close to 0 chance of being a 10). Society says Sydney Sweeney is a 10 because men are going absolutely nuts over her. An average girl saying she's a 10 means nothing to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:44 AM
3

Attractiveness follows a bell curve. A 10/10 is insanely rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:42 AM
3

No i'm not a chad, like i said i consider myself a 6-7. I have to work for it, but i never had to suffer like an incel. But unlike women, i'm not going to just blurt out that i'm a 10 (because i know i'm not) just to inflate my own ego. That's stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:40 AM
3

Where did i whine about chad? I'm just observing reality, chad can get whoever he wants despite any personality flaws. That's just true. A 300 pound woman claiming she's a 10 is like a burger king employee claiming to be a billionaire. That's not confidence. That's delusion masking insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:35 AM
4

Well, because, for example, the push to force 'fat acceptance' onto us by pushing plus sized models onto everything has failed spectacularly. When Victoria's Secret was putting fat women into their lineup, do you honestly think anyone bought that? Sydney Sweeney being the hot new thing didn't happen because she wished herself to be a 10. It's because she's an insanely attractive women and the overwhelming majority of men AND women agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:31 AM
4

No, you're just stubborn and you hate seeing women feel good about themselves so you want to argue over something totally pointless. Yeah that's delusional on 2 fronts: Ugly women can't just wish away being pretty and 2, i don't 'hate' women trying to feel good about themselves, that's stupid. Male bitchiness is literally tanking the birth rate. You are literally dooming humanity. No one wins with that foul attitude you have (not even Chad) I'm quite happily married, lmao. Chad can have the shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:30 AM
5

An extraordinarily ugly woman calling herself a 10 isn't being truly confident. It's being delusional and being insecure at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:21 AM
5

Everyone just laughed because there's Margot Robbie lookalikes everywhere. On every campus, hospital, teachers, fitness studio there's a blonde haired woman who looks like everyday Margot Robbie. We laughed because Margot Robbie is clearly a very attractive woman and LMAO @ the idea that women as attractive as Margot Robbie exists everywhere. See, this is what female delusion does. People exist on a bell curve with respect to attractiveness and attractive women are in a very small minority. She'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:20 AM
3

I'm a 10 because I love myself and my appearance and my body. It's gorgeous and glorious and all mine. You can rate yourself however much you want, but society doesn't have to agree if you're delusional about it. If a random sample of 1000 men rate an average looking girl a 5, but she rates herself a 10, that doesn't mean she gets to be a model.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:15 AM
5

No, but we mostly get it right. Remember when someone said Margot Robbie was 'mid' and the entire world collectively called that person an imbecile? We disagree to small degrees, just because i might rate someone a 9 while you rate them a 10 doesn't mean the rating scale has no value. People who rate people inappropriately are either trolling or stupid as hell (thankfully they are in the minority).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:12 AM
4

The 300 pound monstrosity couldn't possibly believe she's a '10' Female delusion leads to unhappiness for everyone (except Chad, he's the only one who wins).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:10 AM
2

women feeling good about themselves I see no evidence of this. Women here are offended at the idea of being ranked. I consider myself in the 6-7 range, but if someone thought i was average, i wouldn't be mad. If someone rated me below average or ugly, i'd laugh. they want to humble women Furthest thing fromm the truth. From my own experience dudes usually rank attractive women, it's pointless to rank ugly chicks because we don't think about them. Apparently women have discomfort with the idea th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:40 AM
1

Mistyped, i mean subjective. I think the context of what i was saying made it obvious i meant subjective though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:36 AM
2

Many women say “10” as a “fuck you”. Gonna ask an average looking girl if she's a 10... if she says yes, then i'm going to ask if she thinks lizzo is a 10. If she says yes, i'll say, 'cool, i think you look like lizzo'. Watch her get really fucking mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:35 AM
9

The point is you can rate yourself whatever you want, society won't necessarily agree if you're delusional about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:32 AM
2

That's what i said. Nobody is going to rate Sydney Sweeney a 6 except for utter morons. However, if you rated her whole total package, maybe she has an awful personality that we don't know about and she gets knocked a few pegs. For someone else, maybe that doesn't matter all that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:31 AM
3

I think the neuroticism of women in this thread over the concept of having a rating should really inform men of one thing: stop listening to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:29 AM
2

Yeah, but no man is going to care about your opinion on that. Men like rating women on a scale and we're not going to stop just because you try to shame us on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:12 PM
7

Ok? But it's not 'dystopian'. That's almost like saying having opinion of other people is 'dystopian'.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:06 PM
7

its dystopian That's melodramatic, nobody is tattooing your rating to you or keeping a federal database. What a ridiculous reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:42 PM
3

why would i have to rate people to pursue someone? But you do rate them, just not numerically: They might not think to themselves in specific numerical terms, but they do have thoughts like, 'ew', 'meh', 'pretty', 'hot!' etc. It's called 'having a reaction'
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:41 PM
2

That's nice, but people rate people on attractiveness when they want to pursue someone, and this applies to both men and women. They might not think to themselves in specific numerical terms, but they do have thoughts like, 'ew', 'meh', 'pretty', 'hot!' etc. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it doesn't happen with virtually everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:36 PM
0

Nobody ever said the numbering system is a rating of total value. It's obviously based on physical attraction. If i were to rate someone on their total value, that's obviously super objective, but if you took me and 10 other guys and asked us to rate sydney sweeney just on her looks, we're not going to be confused whether she's a 5 or 10. We might disagree by a point... MAYBE 2 max.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:01 PM
3

Beauty is subjective and any man who asks you to rate yourself is baiting you. Why? If someone asks me, i say i'm a 6-7 which is a fair assessment of myself. I mean, i guess if you're ugly i can see why one might get offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:53 PM
12

attraction is subjective This is cope. People have their own tastes, but people don't have wildly divergent views of what is and isn't attractive. Also the rest of your post is fascinating as men don't get upset at women rating other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:52 PM
2

I think they're easily fooled for 2 reasons: 1) Flood of interest even for below average women (and doesn't understand the difference between SMV/RMV). 2) The reinforcement problem mentioned before
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:52 PM
8

Once again, GridRexx gets it wrong by only scratching the surface. Men only 'want and care' only because female attention is scarce. If men had a flood of attention from women, female attention would not be worth much.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 03:44 PM
33

Yes, they're telling on themselves and women are more aware of how society operates with respect to male and female worth in relation to each other than they will admit to. Just like how women will slut shame other women in order to decrease their competitor's value in relation to their own. But in academic debates, women will categorically deny this and adhere to the 'fact' that men and women are the same and have the same access to each other and the 'double standard' of male sluts and female …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 03:41 PM
3

I'm beginning to see why being a passport bro is becoming more popular when i read shit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 02:53 PM
1

Lookup my posts on heuristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:03 AM
3

Just checked his twitter. No nazism found, also not sure how that's relevant to his analysis. I guess him beng a hypothetical nazi means 'looks' and 'personality' aren't important to men. Hitler was a vegan, thus discrediting veganism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:03 AM
2

As a heurstic, you basically invented situations that normally don't happen at a frequent rate. Overweight men who make average wages don't have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:53 PM
1

You'll have to link me to the video to judge, but yes, men judge women who have lots of men around her because statistically speaking, a lot of dudes are going to 'just be friends' to try to get with her. That's not really an incel position, this is a well known phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:17 PM
3

"Incel crap". He's not a blackpiller, jesus christ. It's quite obvious he isn't. If you can't even tell the truth about his follower count, why should i believe you when you say you even watched 1 of his videos? You link me a youtube video, that is what i go off of. I said he blew up on tiktok and you gave me his subscriber base from another channel, make your comment make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:13 PM
1

More women are in relationships than men, logically speaking, women have more leverage. Average men can't, logically speaking, put women into 'situationships'. That's like a man dying of thirst coming across an oasis, taking a few gulps then not entirely quenching his thirst because he requires fuji branded water to be satisfied. I could have just wrote one word in the op: "Leverage" to describe everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:10 PM
5

I don't know if he is personally, but that is his core audience. He is directly making content for incels. a) Check his comments. A lot of women like and agree with it. I wouldn't really call him a redpiller/blackpiller/incel, he has said repeatedly that he regrets treating women poorly when he finally got better with them, and also give s women advice. b) It is 361k You know it's not very effective to gaslight me when i can just open up the link, right? "487.3k Followers" https://www.tiktok.com…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:03 PM
2

You’re trying to apply concrete rules to this Again, look up the definition of heuristics, i never said it was 100%, just the majority of the time, i don't care about edge cases or stuff that happens occasionally. Perhaps opening up the dicitonary would help with this confusion, i don't know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:00 PM
3

Simple: male 5's don't have options and female 4's and below have more options than male 5's. Again, male 5's are average, so they are a) overweight and b) don't make much money, so they are basically useless to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:57 PM
8

a) he's not an incel b) it's closer to 500k c) a lot of women like his shit
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:51 PM
2

Because a higher value girl being with a lower value guy is going to (heuristically speaking) going to expect effort and loyalty to her. Again, using my life as an example, i gave a lot of effort for my wife (then girlfriend) because there was a huge attractiveness gap, but there's no way i would have given that effort if there was ambiguity in whether we were in a monogamous relationship or not. My wife was aware that she had an obvious attractiveness advantage over me, but she was also aware i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:50 PM
2

Just because a possibility CAN happen, doesn't make it the norm. We're talking about what happens most often and analyzing the heuristics of those situations: higher value guy not making it clear what type of relationship a lower value girl is in (and the relationship is obviously not a rock solid LTR, otherwise the guy would be clear on that!). Can it be something else? Yes, but that's a tiny minority of cases and who cares about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:43 PM
6

but that’s only 1 out of 100 different possibilities of what a “situationship” might be. Nope, most men can't engage in situationships. Do you think your average man (who is, by definition, overweight and doesn't make much money) has the ability to string girls along? Jesus Christ. Also, the author isn't an 'incel', he's described his past life when he couldn't get women (shit job, somewhat overweight) and now he does much better with women... also talks about regret stringing women along and us…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:37 PM
6

Probably because nobody gives a fuck about his username and he blew up with both men AND women on tiktok because of his content?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:18 PM
3

"She will embarrass or throw other women under the bus to achieve this goal." So mean girls are pickmes? lol, no. gimpgirl is what i would call pickme: https://np.reddit.com/r/pickmes/ Throwing other women under the bus is at most a very small part of being a pickme.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:59 PM
2

With respect to women, the only thing women compete on are beauty and personality (at least the women who are self aware, the women who think men care about the fact that they're VP of a fortune 500 company are delusional).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:52 PM
2

Ehhh sorry i'm not really motivated to reply back to this, this is going into explainlikeimfive territory but for something that i've explained in its most basic form, it's pretty self explanatory, this isn't quantum mechanics here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:50 PM
3

What is there to expand? What i described is pretty self evident. Would it help to give you the opposite: a loud, disagreeable, greedy, selfish woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:34 PM
2

Winning the starting QB job, being the leader of other men, making more money than other men, being more famous than other men, just higher status and winning competitions in general. In more dangerous lower class neighborhoods, being the most dangerous thug on the street that you just don't mess with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:21 PM
-1

Then there’s other countries in the east What? Thinness is preferred in Asian countries. As well as countries in the global south where they prefer straight up fat women and women force feed themselves to put on the pounds and become marriageable. What countries are you talking about? I don't know any country in the global south where obesitiy is considered attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:18 PM
2

From the parent's perspective, boys had value because they were expected to be their parent's retirement fund. When i talk about human beings vs. human doings, i'm talking about how men and women view each other wrt to the sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:17 PM
1

Submissiveness, nurturing, agreeableness... someone once said 'quiet confidence' as a good descriptor of femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 08:15 PM
11

Right, she really isn't a pick me. A pick me will basically do anything a man wants to please him. The Kim Kardashian type will only use men for their money. She's the anti-pickme.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:07 PM
0

Paradox of female hapiness. Give women more choices and they become less happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:38 PM
-3

You just described most modern liberal women in big cities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:37 PM
15

Pick me's have behaviors that men would want though. Men would rather have the feminine country girl over the kim kardashian wannabe that would bleed our bank accounts dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:36 PM
3

a) That's just common amongst men, we even call each other that as terms of endearment b) We do it in each other's faces. This has nothing to do with intra-sexual competition c) Women talk shit about each other behind their backs, covertly. Nothing you say is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:34 PM
0

Artificial intelligence can already tell which brains are male and which are female at greater than 90% accuracy, feminists in shambles: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2024/02/men-women-brain-organization-patterns.html#:~:text=A%20new%20study%20by%20Stanford,a%20woman%20or%20a%20man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:35 PM
0

A lot of time i feel like i'm arguing with bluepill feminists here about whether men and women are different (psychologically speaking), at the very least, evo-psychs absolutely get it right that we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:23 PM
1

I would say most of that is true. Like i said in another post, red pill is mostly right, they just go too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:13 PM
1

The status is secondary, the primary reason why men don't want to marry the town slut is biological disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:10 PM
0

Your reply doesn't follow any logical conclusion as to what i posted. You're just posting nonsense and wasting my time, so blocked i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:09 PM
5

Of course men trash and shit talk each other, call each other gay and small dicked, etc. To each other's FACE. Women overtly try to create equality and harmony face to face while covertly destroy each other to decrease sexual competition. How are you not understanding this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:08 PM
2

Less attractive men are less attractive because they lose competition. I will never be a threat to Lebron James in the NBA (let alone the college/high school basketball star). And they can do it covertly by talking shit just like women. Except we dont' and it's not an effective strategy for men. Man, you really don't understand intra-sexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:06 PM
0

Also I do wonder if men experience it to the same degree No, we don't, this is just feminist nonsense of 'men and women are the same' that /u/Safinated is trying to convince you of.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:46 PM
4

I’m poo-pooing OPs assertion that men never do it, I'm a man. Male competition is overt and set in stone. Trying to tear down another man via gossip and rumors doesn't work well as a sexual strategy. A group of high school girls starting a rumor that a particular girl they're jealous of is a slut is actually pretty effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:46 PM
5

Basically this chick that reddit went gaga over: https://www.youtube.com/@LauraFarms/videos
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:42 PM
1

You're getting confused, that comment is in reference to how potential mates view each other. You're talking about how parents view their potential kids in China. 2 completely different things. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1bbawae/female_intrasexual_competition_on_display_and_the/ku842d1/?context=3 Weird, i heard women are human beings and men are human DOINGS. Boys in China are seen as a retirement account by their parents, that's why that happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:13 PM
1

Now with body positivity and everyone being larger things have gotten twisted. Men aren't falling for this body positivity bullshit. We're clearly not being influenced by the media on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:10 PM
1

Yeah and how many times in history have evolutionary scientists been completely wrong by now? This is the dumbest critiques i've ever seen anyone make. Science is always evolving and much of what we assumed in the past is wrong. Singling out evo-psych is moronic when most science is like this (except for maybe math/physics).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:09 PM
2

Most men are attracted to women with a .7 waist to hip ratio, women with some curvature, underweight women aren't going to to have that bodytype.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:07 PM
2

Less attractive men aren't a threat to more attractive men, while less attractive women ARE a threat to more attractive women, this is the key variable you're missing. Women are highly social creatures and can destroy each other with words alone. This is why women will call each other beautiful to each other (when some clearly aren't). Women overtly cooperate and value the appearance of equality and harmony while covertly destroy each other with subterfuge. Men compete openly and overtly. The hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 04:00 PM
0

It's a truisim period. Women need to just exist to provide value, men need to perform to provide value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:52 PM
1

but our current beauty standards are generally of women that are >underweight.< Patently untrue. Nobody is attracted to stick women. "Slim thick" and "Female fitness models" seems to be a couple examples of aesthetics that seem to be popular at the moment... women within a normal range of weight are what is attractive. Most men today would say Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield are really attractive even though they're quite dated by decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:51 PM
-3

Things are hypersexualized today, so the female body is on full display everywhere. If men were turned onto fat women, that's what we would demand. "Back in the day" the female body was covered up and women wore corsets to give women the shape that men find attractive. High poverty was also a thing, so a) fat women weren't really 'fat' in the sense that we have today where landwhales are a thing and slightly chubby women could signal being rich by having enough food to eat and b) everyone else w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:40 PM
7

This, to me, suggests guys like TradWives not so much for the aesthetic, but for the values. To expand on this, things are correlated. A highly educated woman who is high achieving on the east or west coast isn't unattractive because she's educated/high achieving, it's because it's going to be correlated with being high maintenence, demanding, unfeminine, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:32 PM
2

Yeah, when people say 'thicc' they mean women with large asses, not 'chubby' which is fat all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:29 PM
5

There's been a big push to make fat women seem attractive in the media/advertisements (even victoria's secret pushed this). Why do you think this didn't take off with men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:27 PM
7

On the one hand, the Lebanese woman is less "boss babe" and more feminine with flowy dresses etc... like a tradwife. So one might expect guys to be all about it. The lebanese woman is anything but tradwife material. She screams 'ordering $10k bottle service at a high end club'. But, the country, home building, gun toting girl is displaying more traditional values... like a tradwife. And she's the one they seem to be going for. This, to me, suggests guys like TradWives not so much for the aesthet…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:25 PM
1

Well, clearly you're wrong. Attractive men aren't afraid to dress up in an attractive way at work like attractive women are: attractive men don't view less attractive men as a threat like attractive women do. The hierarchy is set in stone, men know we can't change it by doing stupid shit like giving bad advice to attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:23 PM
2

Pretty good post 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:19 PM
3

Female intra-sexual competition is actually pretty vicious. Women will purposely give bad advice to more attractive women to make them less attractive (i.e. suggest cutting their hair short to make themselves more attractive). There was one study that showed attractive women are consciously or subconsciously aware that being too attractive can be dangerous for them in the workplace if there are too many women in the office so they will opt to downgrade how they look when they go to the office/dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:10 PM
2

That's an insanely small part of the population. That's like talking about guys who are into polyamory with their wives. Most guys who go for fat chicks are desperate guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:05 PM
3

Are you talking about this person? https://twitter.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1766505056252166611 This is the person i'm referring to who made the analysis of what's going on. As far as i can tell, he's a science fiction writer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:03 PM
0

Similar thing goes for men... imagine a guy which is superficially hypemasculine. Big muscles, beard, alpha, tough guy... but... you can already "smell" not relationship material. But this type of man gets what he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:01 PM
1

No status is a secondary thing. If the girl is a slut, then she's going to be low status which is obviously bad, but that's secondary to the fact that the man in question will have disgust that completely biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:57 PM
7

Dr. Geoffrey Miller (who agrees with the 3rd post) is a professor of evolutionary psychology and focuses on mating psychology https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1766595142025195746
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:54 PM
2

sounds like a lot of excuse-making to defend a woman you like. I don't hunt or build houses or do manual work, i have a dual masters degree, and i lived in mostly urban areas most of my life. Her love of hunting and building houses is almost irrelevant. I find the Southern Belle incredibly attractive. It's just that i have never met such a woman in real life (i mean, i live near NYC, women don't do hunting or manual work here for the most part, duh). Luckily i'm married to a very feminine woman,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:54 PM
1

But of course, social legitimacy is pretty irrelevant for those who have no use for it, and a negative for those who would only be burdened by it. The overwhelming majority of men won't care about 'social legitimacy'. The lebanese woman is a source of stress and would make the lives of most men worse off. The issue is, if you live in a place like NYC, that's basically the type of women you have access to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:50 PM
6

The manual labor thing is somewhat irrelevant. I don't find her building a house attractive or unattractive as a primary source of attraction, but it does give me a secondary signal that i find attractive: she won't leach off me (versus the lebanese woman who will probably bleed me dry). Man is defined as a human being and a woman as a female—whenever she behaves as a human being she is said to imitate the male. Weird, i heard women are human beings and men are human DOINGS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:48 PM
0

Women will tell less attractive women that they're beautiful. Women will tell more attractive women lies to make themselves less beautiful. More attractive women are seen as a threat to less attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:42 PM
0

Her femininity is expressed in her demeanor, not the fact that she likes to hunt and build houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:40 PM
-1

Whats your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:32 PM
1

Exactly, men don't care so much about status in women. A bunch of guys shitting on a woman i find beautiful who has a great personality is not going to change my attraction to her. Evo-Psych is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:30 PM
6

There are american women just like this lebanese woman Yes, like i said, half the women in NYC i come across are just like the lebanese women. It's not specifically about american and lebanese women, you are missing the point, it's about the viciousness of female intrasexual competition on display and the fundamental misunderstanding of what men find attractive. I find very few American women truly attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:27 PM
0

Dr. Geoffrey Miller's (who is professor of evolutionary psychology and focuses on mating psychology) response to the 'far right grift twitter account': https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1766595142025195746 "Well said, & seems psychologically accurate." Also, everyone who disagrees with me politically is an extremist and a grifter (this is about as childish a worldview as you can have)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:25 PM
-1

Female intra-sexual competition is actually pretty vicious. Women will purposely give bad advice to more attractive women to make them less attractive (i.e. suggest cutting their hair short to make themselves more attractive). There was one study that showed attractive women are consciously or subconsciously aware that being too attractive can be dangerous for them in the workplace if there are too many women in the office so they will opt to downgrade how they look when they go to the office/dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:21 PM
-2

isn’t it possible that some men who imbibe a blood-hued capsule could have been misunderstanding what women find attractive? Sure, but not men who understand evolutionary psychology. Redpillers tend to understand (although sometimes go too far to the extreme) pretty well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:18 PM
-1

I mean, that goes without saying that women prefer chad. The point still stands about what men find attractive and female intra-sexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:15 PM
1

Not this particular women, she's generalizing American women to make Lebanese women more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 02:13 PM
0

It's funny how the fault only lies with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 12:59 PM
6

Men asking what women bring to the table: Modern women: "I AM the table!" society is somehow confused as to why men are just straight up quitting
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 07:53 PM
2

"Existing"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:56 PM
14

And with a man more her equal, she will absolutely demand to know where they stand. This is why relationships are breaking down. Women create different rules for different men and men are picking up on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 10:30 PM
15

plenty i don't know about PLENTY, but they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:39 PM
31

If a man is attractive enough, women will lie to THEMSELVES. Women won't ask too many questions with high status men, because they're afraid to lose access to him. That's what most people don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:34 PM
1

And just to elaborate: Simon Biles would have a very difficult time finding her 'professional/celebrity equal' in terms of dating/marriage. The male version of Simon Biles, meanwhile, can attract a harem of hot women (who have 0 professional accomplishment) if he chose to. Men and women are different. Her celebrity and success is irrelevant compared to looks+personality wrt to who she can attract. The fact that you don't understand this is bewildering.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:19 PM
0

And i'm going to explain to you like you're 8 using fewer words to make it easier for you: Her fame doesn't matter to men wrt to relationship status. At all. This is PPD, not /r/Celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:18 PM
0

It's about RELATIONSHIP STATUS which female attractiveness is a big quality that men care about. Her fame and fortune rank very low in terms of what men care about. The fact that she could only get with a scrub NFL player that nobody has heard of when she's more accomplished than he is basically proves my point. This is, apparently, a very difficult concept for you, for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:05 PM
0

Because we're talking about relationships and this is the PPD sub, not a sub about gymnastics. Keep it on topic: she's average, at best. She's not the 'prize' you think she is. Whenever i go to NYC, i pass by hundreds of far more attractive women in half a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:44 PM
-1

Average in looks. Weird how she can't do better than some scrub who's barely in the NFL. If anything, he's doing HER a favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:02 PM
1

I think you purposely miss certain things when you read. No, i don't think i misread what you said: The wife works a full time job + does all the chores + takes care of the children. At least this is how it was in my family. You made a generalization and tried to justify that generalization with your anecdote. I gave you data that gave context to your generalization. This is like that stupid 'statistic' that feminists like to give about how women make 72 cents for every dollar a man makes when i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:15 PM
1

Exhibit B: https://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/06/30/new-report-men-work-longer-hours-than-women/?sh=721b0b1718b4 According to the 2015 American Time Use Survey by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, among full-time employees, men worked 8.2 hours compared to women working 7.8 hours. This might not seem like much, but it adds up. And if you compare employed men and women (regardless of part-time work), employed men work an average of 42 minutes more per day than employed women. 42 min…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 09:52 PM
-1

Men work more hours than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:50 PM
0

The only way women can succeed is for governments to give women special privileges and make society bend to their will.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:52 PM

Because the concept needs to be drilled into men's heads over and over and over again so men are aware. A lot of redpill concepts were fringe 10 years ago, now it's out in the open.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:00 AM
15

Weird how being a violent psychopath doesn't detract from his attractiveness (it enhances it).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:28 PM
5

This is exactly why we restricted female sexuality for all that time. A player isn't going to wait for you to put out. He'll move onto the next girl fast instead of wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:14 PM
15

At the extreme (like MIT grad students), they're just not going to do stupid impulsive shit that get women wild. Women don't want stable intelligent guys when they're young, they want to marry those guys when their time is running out. The guy doing wild retarded shit is going to be more exciting to be with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:12 PM
11

I don't see what we're trying to achieve here The point is, nobody should take women at their word. Watch what they do, not what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:07 PM
7

Female sexual strategy changing when they get older is not an 'assumption'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:05 PM
15

You just admitted you got duped by a player who lies just to get you in the sack, most men can see those types of guys a mile away. This is why female sexuality was restrained for so long and fathers/brothers vetted men for their daughters/sisters.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:05 PM
12

Who is going to be more fun around when you're a young girl, the highly intelligent/highly conscientious man who schedules his life, works hard, is well read, or the spontaneous dumbass who takes dumb risks?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:03 PM
27

Women love the stupid dickhead when they're young because they're more fun to be around. They're not committing to him. In a just world, the intelligent guy who has high conscientiousness, actually contributes to society (instead of being a burden on it), would be way more supportive of his gf, etc. would be beating women off with a stick. But here's the thing, intelligent men being highly conscientious are... BORING. The guy who has his life together, schedules everything ahead of time, works h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:00 PM
12

"Hey i know i ignored you when i was young and hot, but now i'm aging and ran through, want to marry me and support me materially?"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:58 PM
15

I love it when women just tell on themselves. Let me guess, you think you're a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:57 PM
29

Intelligence is associated with being conscientious/agreeable, aka BORING. Better to be the guy who takes stupid risks (doing drugs+violence or at least the propensity for violence) and get women excited. Also: Stated vs. Revealed preference study: TLDR: women say they want intelligent ambitious men, chose the handsome guy instead (in fact, their parents chose the handsome man over the intelligent/ambitious man for their daughter too!). https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12kyo20/w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:51 PM
12

It's that intelligence isn't something women really care about when they're young. In fact, it hurts your dating prospects. Intelligence is associated with being conscientious/agreeable, etc. (aka BORING). The guy who takes dumb risks (doing drugs, getting into fights) is going to be way more exciting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:48 PM
19

Disagreeableness/Dark Triad traits are a spectrum. You don't need to join a gang, you just need to be kind of a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:47 PM
34

Stated vs. Revealed preference study: TLDR: women say they want intelligent ambitious men, chose the handsome guy instead (in fact, their parents chose the handsome man over the intelligent/ambitious man for their daughter too!). https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12kyo20/women_lie_about_their_partner_preferences_they/ Intelligence just isn't something women are attracted to when they're younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:36 PM
7

Ironically, you're the one overthinking this, women prefer attractive men over intelligent men (even though they SAY they prefer intelligent men). Stated vs. Revealed preferences: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1awl9cq/youre_focused_on_the_wrong_qualities_that_are/krig6ur/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:34 PM
13

Stated vs. Revealed preference study: TLDR: women say they want intelligent ambitious men, chose the handsome guy instead (in fact, their parents chose the handsome man over the intelligent/ambitious man for their daughter too!). https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12kyo20/women_lie_about_their_partner_preferences_they/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:33 PM
5

The overwhelming majority of human history was just pure violence. That's the nature of man. Civilization/laws/punishment were artificial means of curbing those impulses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:25 PM
9

Life doesn't have 'super heroes'. In a way, feminists are right, we evolved to be violent. The violent men in the past (i.e. Ghengis Khan) were the ones who were the most successful in reproducing. The meek were victims and didn't reproduce. Civilization, laws, and punishment are what keeps those impulses in check.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:53 PM
40

And i have a different interpretation: the more intelligent you are, the more women avoid you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:51 PM
12

For the last couple of decades all i've been hearing about is 'toxic masculinity' and the attempt to get rid of masculinity altogether, so it appears that masculinity is, by nature, disagreeable and violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:48 PM
14

And what of highly disagreeable men with violent tendencies and possible criminal convictions?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:44 PM
113

I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:06 PM
2

Being disagreeable is highly correlated to having dark triad traits. In evolutionary biology, having dark triad traits meant doing whatever was necessary to get resources (including committing mass murder). Which was a very useful personality to have when starvation was just around the corner and if you were a woman (who, by nature, was dependent on a man in harsh conditions), that's the type of man you would want to attach yourself to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:07 PM
4

Eh, one of the European Survivor shows did a man vs woman competition and the women were completely helpeless while the men thrived surviving in the wilderness. There's a reason you don't see women going into dangerous male dominated jobs with high injury/death rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:09 PM

You sure as fuck don't go for the high conscientious/high iq guys, that's for sure, otherwise there wouldn't be MIT grad students with virginity rates above high school students.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 03:46 PM

Young professional women in their 20's plan on marrying the STEM guys later. But when they're young, they want to bang the drug dealer, the hot bartender, the 'guy in the band' who does coke from time to time, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:50 PM

Your average MIT grad student wouldn't have a chance with them regardless. Imagine being in your mid-20's to early-30's, going to the best STEM school in the world, having an IQ that's 3-4 standard deviations from the mean, having an incredibly bright future and being a virgin because women would rather bang the drug dealer and then telling the same men with high conscientiousness, high agreeableness, high stability, that their niceness and decency are just 'the bare minimum' and they shouldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:39 PM
2

Women don't like pushovers. Disagreeable men are the opposite of pushovers. Agreeableness is highly correlated with being nice. Disagreeable is basically being an asshole. Disagreeable people get what they want, that's why women like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:32 PM

it’s a bare minimum expectation. It's actually what keeps men from having romantic success, this is the problem, you're gaslighting men: I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:28 PM
1

If you're rich and/or very tall and/or very attractive and/or you occupy some weird niche, yes, you absolutely can. I'm talking about heuristics for the majority of the population (aka normies).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:24 PM

Here, let me demolish your argument: https://archive.ph/Bqh5m The researchers found that young men paid for all or most of the dates around 90 percent of the time, while women paid only about 2 percent (they split around 8 percent of the time). On subsequent dates, splitting the check was more common, though men still paid a majority of the time while women rarely did. Nearly 80 percent of men expected that they would pay on the first date, while just over half of women (55 percent) expected men…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:57 PM
3

It's a spectrum, you don't need to be a criminal to get laid, it's just criminality is associated with the disagreeableness personality trait (aka 'being an asshole') which gets you laid. Personally, i adopted being a 'funny playful jerk' persona and that worked really well (there's always the plausible deniability that my assholish behavior is not to be taken seriously and i'm 'just joking'). Women lie to men saying that 'being a decent human being' is the bare minimum to getting a girl when it…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:19 PM
3

Why would a feminist give a shit about abortion anyway, besides the women there basically get to use men as slaves. The expectations for men in China are insane if they want a wife, it's not unheard of for women to expect men in their early 20's to have an expensive condo+car+servants in a tier 1 city in order to for marriage to be on the table
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:48 PM
2

And you don’t see the misogyny in that? Men used as 401k's for the elderly, women most effected
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:29 PM
6

Being a decent human being is probably the worst thing you can do to 'buy sex'. I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, at…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:35 PM
7

Any male celebrity/athlete/musician So, what. 0000000000001% of the population and you're applying that to men as a whole? LMAO, critical thinking skills, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:15 PM
5

Yes, hypergamy is slowly rising the standards. But at the same time, average men fall in quality FASTER than standards are rising. Its not the top that is escaping, its the bottom that is falling. Quality is falling faster because of the unrealistic hypergamy, it didn't happen in a vacuum. Men are just giving up. The quality of women and the price they are asking for is a complete mismatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:38 PM
5

The funny thing is, i'm not sure if you're blackpill or feminist, heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:30 PM
3

Even if the questionnaire was administered online (which has it's own problems), that doesn't mean being 'administered online' doesn't remove problems where people give answers that don't align with their actions. Even if we're to assume that men are 20% less likely to honestly report that they think they should pay on the first date, and if women are 20% more likely to believe that men should pay on the first date, that brings both numbers into relative equality. Why would we assume anything? Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 08:42 PM
1

More than half (54%) of men say the guy should pay for a first date, compared with 36% of women. Someone didn't learn stated vs. revealed preferences. Using a poll like that is completely inappropriate to determine something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 07:57 PM
3

Automation has been in factories since forever. They didn't need AI for the machines since it was the same movements over and over again to mass produce the same items. AI is hitting office work first because AI is mimicking human thought (see: Neural Networks) and decision making. Lots of blue collar work aren't easily automatable becuase it takes an incredibly amount of dexterity that current robotics are TERRIBLE at and each job is different (plumbing is the best example) and the decision mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:36 PM
4

Office jobs are going first before 'hard labor' jobs. Using AI to automate knowledge work is far easier than creating a robot to replace a plumber. Even self driving trucks is proving incredibly difficult. We're seeing creatives in news media having their jobs destroyed by AI, they're the first wave. I'm brushing up on my AI so hopefully I can save my finance job from automation, hopefully by being knowledgeable enough about AI that i can be the one in control.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:25 PM
5

All of these solutions and yet men are still “struggling”. There’s a disconnect somewhere. 1) You have to have some baseline level of attractiveness. If you're short, it's going to kill your chances. 2) Psychopaths and Narcissists have an easier time doing this than a normie
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 05:19 PM

And if you don’t some other dude definitely will. Aren't 50% of women over 40 projected to be single and childless by like 2050 or something like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 04:52 PM
4

If you think you could do better, create your own society. The most obvious thing would happen: you would live in mud huts and you would die out. Women don't want 'equality' when it comes to extremely hard/dangerous jobs, they only want 'equality' when it comes to comfy air conditioned jobs. And by 'equality', i mean special privileges where merit doesn't matter. If just the men who dig up the gournd to build and maintain sewer systems just all of a sudden decided to not do those jobs anymore, p…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 04:50 PM
8

At this point I firmly believe women or more accurately, females are superior to males (Regardless of what gender presentation they choose) in the overwhelming majority of cases, and the world would be better if we acknowledged it and structured society based on that. If the world restructured society based on the idea that women are superior, society would collapse because women are unable to/unwilling to do this type of work that is necessary to keep the world running: https://twitter.com/Catc…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 03:04 PM
61

You'd think people would recognize the duplicity of feminists/women now when they shriek about men who shame fat women but then shame short men without thinking about it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:36 PM
1

Is he dating or marrying the girls in those videos? Contradiction not available.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:38 PM
5

Because if we didn't admit that men and women were different, we might have to scrutinize, for example, why the military has to lower physical standards for women to become soldiers. Feminism is just one big shit test that society is failing big time. Boys and girls think the same, there is no such thing as 'boy interests' and 'girl interests'. Anything men can do, women can do as well. We all think the same, these differences are just socialized.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:38 AM

You lack imagination. Men and women are different. Western women are so pampered and entitled that they can afford to think like that. It's also partly biological. Yes. It's catnip for a certain species of manospherian and you seem to have fallen for it. It was a ted talk i don't think this was marketed towards being for the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:19 AM

You can't seriously believe that this woman had "has a boat" as a requirement when she was younger and dating. Again, as a man, i have never thought an 'ideal woman' needed to have a ferrari, or a big house to want me to marry her. She pared down an ideal list to a basic requirement list as she matured. Here let me rephrase that: She pared down her insane list as she got older and was looking down the barrel of being a cat lady This was a lady who made a ted talk about being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:15 AM

See, here's where you're wrong, it wasn't an 'ideal' list, it was a 'requirements' list, because if you fast forward, you'll see she shortened her list as she got older: https://youtu.be/PjR8iWMpNqQ?list=PL0omKTGqrSCAaZAYfudCLDSIrLEeOyDJt&t=342
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:56 PM

I've never thought of 'ideal qualities' like 'is a patriots fan' and 'knows how to smoke a brisket' because i'm not an entitled baby, i mean, woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:50 PM

On a side note, no one should stay with a bad partner and hope they'll change. We have to look out for themselves. Easy for women to say when you get 1000 right swipes in a day on tinder. You see why men are just dropping out of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:45 PM

That last sentence probably got some panties wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:41 PM

Here's the problem, women with sky high standards which no man can meet who still get into relationships treat those men like garbage. The men with no leverage has to eat that disrespect or be foreveralone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:40 PM

I mean, speaking as a man, my list is: Not a cunt at least average looking not in debt Just saying, having a long list is also retarded and one thing women need to be shamed for, not just the content of the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:34 PM

whether it's a real person or a troll creating "evil women high standards rage" content. That's nowhere near the most unrealistic list of standards i've ever seen, this is a real lady: https://youtu.be/PjR8iWMpNqQ?list=PL0omKTGqrSCAaZAYfudCLDSIrLEeOyDJt&t=188 Everytime a woman makes other women look bad, out comes the 'it must be fake!' conspiracy theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:31 PM

Instagram didn't exist for genx women, stop talking out of your ass. Instagram, by itself, turned women into extreme narcissists. Don't get me started on dating apps like Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 05:30 PM

Capitalism reduced poverty worldwide. Politicians in blue cities are the major cause of inflation - they refuse to build housing. The NY times has a surprisingly good video essay on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNDgcjVGHIw Politicians restricting the supply of housing is about as anti-capitalist as you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 05:17 PM

They're complaining about how inflation in food and rent is killing them too. lol. Seems like financial security as a single woman isn't as secure as you would think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:41 PM

Considering your attitude, i highly doubt your job is more important than a man who, for example, digs coal of of coal mines and dies from black lung at like 45.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:35 PM

None, i have an office job. I work in corporate finance, and i readily admit my job isn't 'necessary' for society to survive. But those men who build the sewers are completely invisible to you while i get a decent amount of attention from women. Funny how that works. I remember reading an article arguing sewers are more important than doctors because we used to just throw out human waste into the streets and tons of people would die of stupid diseases like dysentry until the invention of the sew…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:31 PM

Oh gee, why didn't men think of that. Hold on, let me tell my nephews to start dating victoria secret models.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:29 PM

Men date and marry down. Women date and marry up and technology has exacerbated it 100 fold compared to my generation. Women are like a Big Mac pretending to be fillet mignon. That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:28 PM

I'm confused, women say they don't need a man because they make their own money, yet shit from tiktok gets leaked to reddit quite a bit where professional women are complaining about how hard they work and how they can't afford anything and certainly can't afford a house. If they were married to a man who also worked, a house would be within reach. There's a disconnect in logic here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:27 PM

Women don't need men If men decided to collectively stop doing all the necessary work (electrical/construction/building out sewers/building wind farms/driling for oil/digging for coal/installing your heating and AC/building roads/maintaining and repairing all the infrastructure etc.), civilization would implode. Women's inability to see the world past their nose never ceases to amaze me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:21 PM

Everyone feels younger people are the worst. By that logic, what would you know about young people? I know i wouldn't hire most zoomers because zoomers are barely literate, if at all, partially due to dysgenics, partially due to brain rot from staring at tiktok 8 hours a day. IQ's have been dropping since the mid-aughts, we used to have increasing IQ's every generation (known as the flynn effect), then in the mid-aughts, that trend reversed into a reverse flynn effect: https://www.popularmechani…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:15 PM

No, she isn't. The milennial/zoomer generation of women are absolute dogshit and creating men who just don't give a fuck anymore or are becoming passport bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:13 PM

Younger men are just dropping out of society or becoming passport bros because they a) can't compete and b) think the 'product' (american women) is substandard and too costly. The men who are more entitled and narcissistic are the top dogs. Their standards are realistic because women reward top men more than they did men of my generation. Do you just not pay attention at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:57 PM

Entitlement, narcissim, unrealistic standards, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:52 PM

You have a really rosy view of the past You're a woman in her 20's, wtf do you know about the past? I'm a genXer, young women are way fucking worse than my generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:42 PM

Before Griggs vs. Duke power https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/424/ Before you could just hire people based on IQ tests. But that's illegal due to 'disparate impact' and now people have to go into serious debt to for a dubious education that doesn't prove shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:39 PM
1

Your flair is confusing
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 05:17 PM

The solution is obvious: bring back a merit based society and get rid of welfare. Also reform alimony/divorce laws so that men have an incentive to work hard and commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:45 PM

sensible women chuckles
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:44 PM

The number of white women going on tiktok to bitch about their air conditioned white collar jobs is insane. These ladies wouldn't last one hour in a blue collar job.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:43 PM
10

I have no idea Exactly, because normie women want to remain clueless and complacent while "feminazi" women run roughshod over society.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:58 PM
1

Because they're realistic. The average MIT grad student is going to look like the average MIT grad student. Women's stated preference is for smart ambitious men (why, that describes MIT grad students to a T!). Their REVEALED preference are for attractive men, instead: https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12kyo20/women_lie_about_their_partner_preferences_they/ For MIT grad students, they're banking on their future financial success to land them a GF/wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:57 PM
14

And now that it's not just loser men, where are the normie women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:09 PM
22

Crazy that you take the word of the small minority of loud and obnoxious femnazis and in turn apply it to the general normal female population. I mean, it's a 2 way street though, when "feminazis" started screaming about that shit, normie women should have been up in arms against them, but... tumbleweeds.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:30 PM
1

You're not going to take the fact that an obese woman who's been photoshopped to look like a pig still gets more matches on dating apps than above average looking dudes? Yeah close your eyes and ears.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:10 AM
2

scott alexander is a pretty trustworthy person. I mean you can click on the links if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:24 PM
6

Google 'pigwoman experiment'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:23 PM
3

I'm pretty sure 'likes attractive women' is a very common trait amongst hetero males.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:23 PM
2

Physical attractiveness gets your foot in the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:22 PM
-3

In the modern world where women don't need a man to be financially secure Yes, because women who make a lot of money go for broke guys, lmao, do you people even proofread what you write before you post? you better be pleasant to be around if you want a woman who is. Maybe that's where many of these "manosphere" guys are going wrong, expecting a nice decent woman when they are neither nice nor decent themselves? Women don't care for 'nice and decent', they want dark triad personality traits. Men …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:21 PM
6

Uh, i lift at the gym 5 days a week. You're wrong. LMAO, are you kidding me? Of course they're in short supply. The gym isn't a representative sample of men. First of all, most of the dudes in the gym lifting aren't 'big and buff'. Secondly, the 'gym' isn't a representative sample of the male population. That'd be like going to an anime club and seeing all the nerds and saying, 'oh wow, i didn't know the general population has so many anime nerds'. If every woman wanted 'big and buff guys', the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:19 PM
3

One would always say she wants a big buff guy then always end up with the thin nerdy type. AGAIN, CONSTRAINTS... big buff guys are in short supply, thin nerdy types are a dime a dozen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:00 PM
2

No, but i can talk for the overwhelming majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:59 PM
5

If there are any virgin women, they're volcels, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:57 PM
2

Uh, yes it does? Women are conscious about what they want, but then when it comes to acting on it, they do something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:56 PM
2

I'm not allowed to care about the younger men in my life and around the country now? Only women are allowed to care about other women and men should just fend for themselves? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:26 PM
-1

Stated vs. Revealed preferences: Self-reported ratings by both women and their parents indicated that the traits ambition and intelligence were significantly more important than physical attractiveness for a long-term mate for daughters. And, across conditions, both daughters and parents rated the ambitious and intelligent man as a more desirable dating partner than the more attractive man. However, when asked to choose the best mate for daughters, both daughters (68.7%) and their parents (63.3%…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:20 PM
0

Also, stated vs. revealed preferences (women lie about this shit): https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12kyo20/women_lie_about_their_partner_preferences_they/ And, across conditions, both daughters and parents rated the ambitious and intelligent man as a more desirable dating partner than the more attractive man. However, when asked to choose the best mate for daughters, both daughters (68.7%) and their parents (63.3%) chose the more attractive man as the best long-term dating par…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:19 PM
2

I never said it was ALL looks, but looks make up the majority of it. In fact, looks are going to be the most important thing to get your foot in the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:16 PM
8

Because of constraints. If 6'3" or above were 20% of the population, you'd see a lot more girls with 6'3" or above men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:15 PM
1

lol, i'm happily married.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:13 PM
1

Of course it's not all looks, it's just mostly looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:12 PM
4

So what you're saying is women care more about the facade of intelligence rather than someone who understands quantum physics at a deep level. I think an MIT machine learning/AI grad student is probably going to run circles around your average hollywood star with respect to 'perceived' or 'actual' intelligence. Please stop bullshitting, this is embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:58 PM
9

Did you read the part about how MIT grad students (so men in their mid-20's to early 30's) have higher virginity rates than high school students? These are the smartest men in the country (the dumbest MIT grad is probably has an IQ like 2 standard deviation from the mean) and yet you think INTELLIGENCE and TALENT are what attracts women, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:51 PM
-9

A lot of men struggle with commitment, cause they don't really know what they want. Attractive men struggle with commitment because there's no reason to commit when women are throwing themselves at you, yes. Is a nice personality a strong personality? Is it a passive personality? Is it someone that agrees with everything you say? Is it someone that challenges you everyday? Most men don't want loud girlboss feminist types. We want someone pleasant to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:44 PM
9

Other traits like intelligence, humour, and some sort of talent all play a part. Swing and a miss https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/ I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:42 PM
-12

Women don't know what they want any more or less than men do. This is dumb. Men know what we want (attractive women with nice personalities). Women sorta know what they want (i.e. the height thing) and sorta don't (i.e. going for assholes).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:37 PM
10

I checked one of her other videos, she's 6 feet tall. If she wants a man taller than her, that's going to be in single digit % of the population territory. Assuming she wants to wear heels, and wants a man like 6'4"/6'5", that's like 1 or 2% of the population. She is VERY tall for a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:36 PM
13

Here's a tall girl begging short girls to date shorter guys instead of going for taller guys so she has men taller than her left over for her. Here's Hoe_Math (genius as usual) describing why her begging other women to go with her plan doesn't work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlGixnTppOU
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:32 PM
1

Women have been socialized that all men need is the love of a good woman for them to reach their full potential. Do blue pilled women just enjoy making things up all the time or something? The loveable dumb dad that needs his wife to get his life together. If you're talking about sitcoms, the message is that men are dumb and fat and will never get their lives together while the woman is beautiful and smart and basically an avatar of western women everywhere. Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 04:16 PM
1

Not sure about the timeline, too lazy to google it... it was either 2030, 2040, or 2050, one of those years. Hypergamy + technology + giving women the franchise really fucked up society. It's going to be hilarious when social security and medicare collapse because we have an inverted population pyramid due to nobody reproducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:28 PM
2

I never knew being a pacifist meant taking an ass kicking and not defending yourself at all. Does your GF know that you would let her die to a violent criminal?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:15 PM
1

Talk about avoiding the hypothetical. Even if the chance of happening were slim, what do you think she would say if she knew you wouldn't help her out in that situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:14 PM

Teachers looks at all the failing public schools Sorry, what value are we talking about here?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:13 PM
15

Aren't like 50% of women supposed to be single and childless by like 2040 or something? It's not an 'online' thing. Maybe it's just somewhat ahead of its time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:47 PM
2

The 'crazy shit' i say online (i.e. thinking IQ/intelligence has some genetic basis, because of things like twin adoption studies and polygenic scoring) is shit i believe, but society doesn't allow me to say. Nothing i say is 'crazy', just 'socially unacceptable, but inherently true'. Maybe YOU say actual crazy shit online because you have some sort of actual mental issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:45 PM
3

Yeah i think that shipped sailed when everyone said the black pill and red pill were just terminally online/too niche to care about then even the mainstream media started reporting on the epidemic of male loneliness/datelessness/etc. You can't just handwave away social media trends anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:42 PM
2

Why do blue pillers conflate personal anecdotes to populate wide statistics? I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, atten…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:08 PM
3

I'm not sure if i'm misinterpreting your postor not, but you would literally let your girlfriend fend for herself against a 200 pound man in a physical altercation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:06 PM
7

I am not responsible for my partner. She is responsible for herself. /u/Imetapossumforreal sees his girlfriend getting her ass beat by a 200 pound man "That's ok, you can take care of it, you're an adult who's responsible for herself"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:42 AM
4

Men with dark triad traits get the most sex. Sorry to burst your bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:40 AM

Here's the secret sauce: You can't simply be an asshole to women who pride themselves as well-adjusted and secure. Here's the secret sauce: attractive women are at least a little bit nuts. Being nice is boring. They're used to drama. They crave drama. The asshole gives it to them in spades.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 05:14 PM

Bro there is something intrinsically wrong with you if you really did that. Here, let me translate bluepillspeak: "STOP NOTICING THINGS"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:05 PM

If OP is a man.... men are typically pretty good at determining attractiveness on a gaussian scale. Women? Not so much (EVERYONE IS A 10! [if they're female]... all men are ugly).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:03 PM
2

Yes, they choose extremely hard and dangerous jobs. Because who else would do it... WOMEN?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:37 AM
1

5% of oil rig workers are women Showing they don't want to. Explain to me why there's such a big push to get women into software engineering but not as much of a push to get them into logging? 18% of the US army are women 21% of the US navy are women 24% of the US air force are women. I never said they can't (well, they really can't though), the more important point was: THEY DON'T WANT TO. How many of these women want to be infrantry? How many of those women are in support roles? Like... just b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 09:34 PM
2

more women will take these jobs. Women are already capable of being soldiers I'm being trolled, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:44 PM
4

"privilege" https://twitter.com/CatchUpFeed/status/1748437762825486430 Meanwhile, women are crying about there not enough women in software engineering even though they're taking up all the other cozy air conditioned office jobs. Imagine if men doing all the dirty nasty dangerous jobs that basically support the entire infrastructure all of a sudden decide to quit all at once, this country would implode and go back to the stone age. Before we had functioning sewer systems, people just threw out h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:25 PM
2

It is some fucking bullshit, and everyone will be happier once we are able to finally put these outdated gender norms and expectations behind us. Women sure are lining up to do these jobs, aren't they? https://twitter.com/CatchUpFeed/status/1748437762825486430
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:22 PM
2

I guess that's the difference between men and women, men care about substance, women care more about feelings. We're not as easily offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:25 AM
3

I'd care more about the content rather than the name because i actually care about substance rather than whining over nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 09:51 PM
2

You got everything wrong about him based on a rather humorous name of his. He's not a redpill creator. Why should i take anything you say about him seriously if you get his content wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:53 PM
1

Did you see his videos where he regrets treating women as disposable when he started working out and becoming more attractive? I don't think you've seen most of his videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:25 PM
3

A male 10 and a female 10 would have gotten together 'back in the day', but because of feminism/the sexual revolution, it gave all the power to male 10's. Now male 10's don't have to settle For anything. The male 10's are the true winners in this marketplace. I didn't make the rules, women did this to themselves. You sound angrier than the men you purport to be angry 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:05 PM
4

The mindset of being a fan of hoe_math and kevin samuels isn't in the same universe. That's a really stupid analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:19 PM
5

Pretty girls have it as easy as I imagine. They have an easier time finding sex and relationships. That's as far as the topic goes and I don't see how it's not immediately graspable. Ascribing extra bullshit like "oh the men who hit them up only want sex" is just silly to me because women should be responsible (and rational ones are) for their own sexual choices and that is on them You're referring to my caveat. Me and hoe_math are referring to the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:05 PM
3

Hoe_math isn't like kevin samuels... at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:04 PM
-2

The women who give approving comments on his posts aren't 'teens', they're fully grown women. A big portion of his fanbase is female who are trying to avoid the traps most modern women fall into. If he was just a redpill content creator, he woulnd't have any female fans. I find it hilarious that both red pill and blue pill are arguing with me on opposite grounds here. Looks like hoe_math is onto something.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:01 PM
0

Assuming both care about LTR's, it's a fair exchange. This is also predicated on the woman being raised right. Obviously wouldn't work for a female 10 being raised by a single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:58 PM
-3

Nah, he looks at it from a woman's POV as well, otherwise he'd just say, 'all women have it easy'. It's not that simple. He's being sympathetic to a certain subset of women here. He's pretty popular with women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:54 PM
4

Height is mostly genetic, but 'hotness' isn't nearly as clear cut. I consider adriana lima to be the hottest woman alive and her parents are ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:44 PM
1

Let's see what girlboss icon Sheryl Sandberg and author of Lean In, which was an NY Times best selling book for over a year. Straight from her book: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/772391-when-looking-for-a-life-partner-my-advice-to-women When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:16 PM
1

They're not making informed decisions with respect to high time preference mating choices vs. low time preference choices, the tradeoffs between being a girl boss and fertility, etc. Society is telling them that they can have everything without compromise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 02:52 PM
2

Are they really choosing or is society programming them?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 02:07 PM
2

you’re waiting till marriage People married young. Meanwhile, i'm seeing videos of 40+ year old virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 02:06 PM
1

I have a fantasy of putting an axe through someone's head and then pulling apart by inserting my fingers in it. Weird, i don't have such fantasies or any fucked up fantasies in general, why do you post like that's normal for a human?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:59 PM
12

Like yeah, emotional manipulation works. Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh? But people keep telling me that modern women are strong, independent girl bosses, how is it POSSIBLE they can fall for such tricks? GASPS
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:58 PM
4

Because, lets be honest, she gave it up easily for the hot guy while the normie guy had to make significant amounts of time, money, and effort to try to woo her to even get a kiss.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 02:08 PM
0

Expectation to have low standards - Expectation that men have to be more comfortable being dirty, sleeping on the floor, doing gritty, painful, or 'nasty' work. Who do you think will do this work? WOMEN? If men don't do the nasty/dangerous work, society collapses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:05 PM
2

Ashley Madison is mostly bots/fake and not representative of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 10:18 PM
2

It's more than enough to paint a whole crowd with the same brush, wtf, lmao. Liberal women are twice as risky.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 09:57 PM
4

70/30 is a huge difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:57 PM
7

liberal leaning people who are plenty commitment oriented. I remember a study that showed that 70% of liberal women thought that there were good reasons to justify cheating while only 30% of conservative women do, so no, i disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:54 PM
0

commitment minded ones are harder to find on the market especially after a certain age. It's called being 'religious' and 'conservative'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:30 PM

I would say yes. I'm a married older man and even men my age (married or not) are talking about red pill concepts and the problem younger men face these days with how women are behaving. It's disconcerting to see young men just check out of society because there really aren't any good viable mates out there and the incentive to work hard and be productive members of society is dying. This discussion would have been unthinkable years ago for my cohort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:47 AM
31

That's literally a well-known cognitive bias (in fact, men have the same bias in favor of women too): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 12:52 AM
8

Sorry but women brought this on themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 04:23 PM
6

Men and women are different. It's not hypocrisy at all. It's hard for men to get casual sex while it's incredibly easy for women to do so. Scarcity (or lack thereof) is what determines quailty/value here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 12:12 AM
13

That and the woman-are-wonderful effect. Nobody gives a shit if a woman does something bad to a man, but vice versa there will be hell to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 08:31 PM

why can't any inc*l just hit the gym and get laid like a woman would be able to? Are you shitting me? I go to the gym 6 days a week and i've been doing that for years. I think i have a pretty decent body but i wouldn't call my body an 'adonis' type stripper body. You have no idea what type of dedication it takes to even get to my level and the overwhelming majority of people don't have that type of dedication.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 12:52 AM

exaggerated caricature Most strippers don't have fake tits, most male strippers are muscular and they are not 'exaggerated caricatures', that would be actual bodybuilders who compete
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 12:49 AM
1

The fat women who dress slutty are delusional if they think they can get a HVM to commit, but they absolutely can get an average to above average guy to smash or maybe even date by being hyper sexual and easy. The overwhelming majority of men will go towards the path of least resistance. Google "pig woman experiment" and see the most hideous woman photoshopped to have chest hair and look like a hybrid human/pig and be amazed at the amount of swipes she gets on OLD. I cannot believe i'm having th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 01:42 PM
1

? I'm happily married.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:25 AM
0

They absolutely are. Your average male feminist isn't going to be the alpha of the group. They're going to be mewling pussies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:25 AM
3

no its not a fact.. there is no indication a promiscuous women wont stay committed later in life nor a religious one wanting to “try new things” after marriage etc.. my point is there is NO safe bet. It blows me away that people just make up shit like this. You're asking people to pretend past behavior doesn't matter. That's insane. The religious girl would have just been a hoe if she was that thirsty for variety before she got married. If she waited for marriage for sex, she has a low time pref…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:17 AM
1

How do you characterize a woman who is not a virgin? Lets do the opposite: How would i characterize a woman who IS a virgin? I would characterize her as someone with self control, who is very discerning when it comes to who she wants to mate with, and has a low time preference. Aka the perfect wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:11 AM
3

My point is that you are pretending that men are oblivious to the fact that you are dressing provocatively for sexual attention and pretending that you are not like everyone has an IQ 1 standard deviation to the left of the mean. It's the narcissism combined with trying to insult everyone's intelligence that is revolting. It'd be one thing to say that if you had an IQ of 70 (at least you could claim you are stupid), it's another thing to have at least average intelligence and making that insane …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:04 AM
1

https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/ I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 12:03 AM
5

It sure is strange that women dressing provocatively happens when men are around. The majority of women wouldn't dress that way at a children's birthday party.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 09:57 PM
6

"We dress how we want for ourselves." Bullshit. Most women who dress in a scantily clad way wouldn't dress like that at a child's birthday party. It's about getting sexual attention. I'm supposed to believe that women who dress like sluts at a sexually charged venue like a club with thirsty men are just 'doing it for themselves'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 09:37 PM
8

Read this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/18m31v9/why_men_will_judge_your_personality_and_character/ke2ef7a/ We encounter so many people in our daily lives, i'm not going to go all cia background check on everyone and i'm going to make quick judgements that are completely rational to save time. And this isn't only related to any interactions i have with women i might be interested in, i have way too many fucking daily interactions with people of both sexes that affect …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 09:32 PM
1

It's a heuristic, not a 100% certainty. Revealing clothing DOES 100% guarantee more primal sexual interest from men, and women are asking us to pretend to be stupid and ignorant about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 08:39 PM
1

Agreed, people are too tied to their own personal emotions/politics to rationally see how society works. Behavioral genetics/evolutionary psychology should also be taught in schools. Just thought of one other funny thing about this discussion. I wouldn't be surprised if, in the overwhelming majority of cases, the 'tattoo face guy' accepts the social contract where he understand that he isn't fit for respectable professional employment because he doesn't care at all and is satisfied with his lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 08:28 PM
4

Women automatically have value to society, men have 0 value to society unless they prove, on an individual level, that they do. Shortness = low value, automatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:56 PM
1

In the last 200 years after colonialism. ??? by 200 years, you mean most of human history? Biological differences absolutely justify double standards, because you're comparing apples to oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:50 PM
6

Tons of women see ultra conservative men as a red flag and won’t date them because of this. I remember an article a while back about women in places like NYC who wanted men who acted as conservatives (has high leadership qualities, confident, treated women as women [aka paid for dates instead of splitting the bill like a good male feminist], a go getter, etc.) while still having liberal values/politics. Meanwhile, they are stuck with wimpy liberal men who wear their emotions on their sleeves and…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:38 PM
5

“You don’t know 100% that a face tat guy will be a bad worker compared to a guy that looks highly professional” Yup, basically their argument is, "there's a 10% chance that the face tattoo guy will be a good worker. That's exactly the same as the 70% chance that the well dressed guy will be a good worker!". Or even worse: "I know a face tattoo guy who is a good worker so that must mean, on average, they're just as good as the well dressed guy without a face tattoo!" Nobody is going to do an fbi/…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:23 PM
6

I have no problem with a high quality woman (who happens to be mine) shaming low quality women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:04 PM
3

Absofuckinglutely. Take 100 dudes with tattoos on their head. Just because a few of them might be good workers, that doesn't mean i'm going to pick one of them versus from a pool of 100 guys who dress well and DON'T have face tattoos. It's weird that the overwhelming majority of people would agree with you, yet when it comes to women dressing provacatively we're supposed to pretend that says nothing about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:58 PM
3

For the overwhelming majority of societies, women being topless isn't accepted by society. And we're talking about very diverse cultures. There's also a reason why matriarchal societies are extremely rare. How did women never just... conquer men? Men and women are different. The fact that we're arguing this is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:56 PM
8

men do not optimize for loyalty. Are you serious? Even desperate men try to optimize for loyalty (they just don't have good options to do it because of poor leverage and have to take what they can get).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:52 PM
1

This part of my OP could be a stand-in for high status/low status men. They really need to make statistics mandatory in high school. Are there women who dress in skimpy clothes and go out to clubs who DON'T monkey branch or cheat? Sure, but we're talking about probabilities here. ... Conversely, are there women who dress modestly who don't make good faithful LTR investments? Yes. But the probability that they're going to be a good long term investment is going to be much better than the scantily…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:52 PM
3

So you admit you have a double standard? Yes, because biology has a double standard, because men and women are different. Is it a mystery to you why men being topless in public is no big deal while women being topless in public is scandalous and often illegal? Is this an actual conversation we're having here?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:49 PM
6

Saying women who dress like sluts are not a good investment, probabilistically speaking, isn't a 'manifesto'.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:41 PM
4

I addressed this in the OP. I don't care about anecdotes, i care about population wide probabilities. Russian roulette with 4 bullets in the chamber are going to be riskier than a gun with 1 bullet in the chamber. Even if you survive with the 4 bullet gun, that doesn't mean you made the right choice over the 1 bullet gun. Are there women who dress in skimpy clothes and go out to clubs who DON'T monkey branch or cheat? Sure, but we're talking about probabilities here. ... Conversely, are there wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:39 PM
6

Fat acceptance is for women only. It's considered cruel to make fun of fat women, not of short men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:17 PM
3

Would you agree with a gender flipped statement: "women shouldn't date men who run without a shirt on. They are doing it to attract attention from women and therefore are more likely to cheat"? No, because men and women aren't the same. The overwhelming majority of men who have their shirts off are not attractive. And women don't respond to men that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:14 PM
5

My wife is more judgemental of sluts than i am, why would she care? I literally never talk about this stuff IRL, but she'll call out women who dress like tramps to me (especially at the gym).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:12 PM
9

What is your "definitive" knowledge of this based on? The 50% divorce rate? Men who don't have leverage (high status) have to accept what they can get. If you're low status, expect to have your wife get bored of you/resentful that she married a man who couldn't measure up to the chads in her life and leave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:11 PM
6

It's socially acceptable to dehumanize short men. Fat women are not only accepted, but they're PROMOTED (see: advertisements even in victoria secret and other fashion brands showing off fat women). That's the difference. Women want double standards in their favor and society obliges.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:26 PM
0

For example: Women can act in a feminine or masculine, meek or confident, well adjusted or neurotic, smart or dumb and have value to society and attention from men. Men have to never show any weakness and be strong, confident, smart, etc. to have any value to anyone (not women who are interested in a partner).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:24 PM
3

Statistics show that men who engage in violence, have ties to gangs, have been incarcerated, etc. are more sexually successful than men who don't engage in such acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:13 PM
10

I"m married to a good woman, who isn't religious. Never dressed provocatively in her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:07 PM
0

How you decide to dress is literally part of your behavior though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:06 PM
6

The fact that we're having this debate is insane to me, this should be obvious. Everyone, and i mean EVERYONE is going to make different assumptions about a man who dresses well in a suit vs. a homeless guy with needles all around him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:03 PM
7

Women will be interested in men who are thuggish/criminals though, weird how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:00 PM
5

No, my argument assumes that you shouldn't even partner up with such a woman in the first place so your scenario wouldn't even exist: The man looking for a stable partner would never have picked a woman who dressed scantily.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:59 PM
4

Nobody said you shouldn't? But the funny thing is, the opposite case isn't really true for men: Men who dress and act like thugs do very well with women, while the stable guy comes up empty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:58 PM
7

It's really unclear what PoV you're arguing with. Are there really many women who say "don't judge me by my actions?" Because that's patently ridiculous. Yes? In the west, at least, a lot of women will hold unrealistic standards for their own behavior (vs. that of men). This is one example of it. Men are expected to act in a confined way, while women are able to act however they wish. Another example: Women will blow a gasket if a man says he doesn't want to date an overweight woman, but at the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:58 PM
2

The point of the video was that how you dress is part of your behavior though. Obviously, if she dresses provacatively for you in the confines of your home, that's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:30 PM
3

Those women are good for short term relationships, nothing wrong with that, but i'm specifically talking about 'wifey material', hence the title.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:29 PM
6

That goes against what you said. They aren't 'choosing' to stay single, they are staying slngle because men they find attractive aren't choosing THEM.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:51 PM
12

Agreeable men are often taken Incorrect, disagreeable/dark triad men are the most sexually successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:33 PM
3

It’s estimated that 45% of women ages 25–44 will be single by 2030, according to a study by Morgan Stanley. https://medium.com/hello-love/study-predicts-45-of-women-will-be-single-by-2030-1fbc99bad6a8 You have 0 idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:32 PM
23

They have one high standard - looks. Well, 2 standards: also money
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:31 PM
5

because she is still getting to know him Some of you people need to be friends with really attractive men. I was once friends with a 10 and women just threw themselves at him upon seeing him. They weren't 'getting to know him' at all. They saw he was 6'3", muscular (but not like bodybuilding muscular), chiseled jaw and they acted like animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 04:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter