TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Admirable_Bass8867 Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by Admirable_Bass8867 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

How can people lighten up and laugh at themselves of people like you cannot learn to write jokes that aren't cliche'? We'll never know.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:05 AM
1

Yes. Just learn why (from psychologists).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:49 PM
1

I recommended that you look into the terms that describe the behavior pattern that you have. There, you will learn how it is clingy and other insights. There's a Facebook group called "Anxiously Attached". Just join it and read it for awhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:26 PM
1

I understand . All I'm offering is that you will find a lot of value in learning why you perceive it the way you do. Maybe you will always block people. Still, it's good to learn why.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:23 PM
1

Oddly, I've found that some people want to be abused and sexually assaulted. All Tate needs to do is pair with the ladies that like their hair pulled and all that rough stuff. It's not my thing, bit it's common. I suspect he has to deal with false accusations as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:21 PM
2

You may want to consider therapy for that. Your life may be better if you're less concerned about such a small issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:54 PM
1

Not in this way. The clingy "you didn't text me back immediately" nagging isn't desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:52 PM
1

It's easier to find love when everyone wants to have sex with you than it is when no one does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 01:07 PM
1

Learn about the anxious-preoccupied attachment style behavior pattern. You seem overly controlling.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 01:06 AM
1

You're literally a DECOY, 88! Bwhahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 06:01 PM
1

I think that's an error. I just want the behavior pattern to be consistent. Ultimately, I believe we're all somewhat inauthentic. Please keep in mind that YOU are currently commenting on an anonymous forum (and you do so a LOT). 😂 How authentic do you really belove you are hiding behind that overly used avatar of yours? Your hypocrisy and the irony are not lost on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 06:00 PM
0

666 stands. Like Tate, I'm over 6 feet tall, have a 6 pack (because I currently train to reach a physically demanding goal, and earn over 6 figures). I kinda sorta look like Tate; Kinda. Personality-wise I can be described kinda like Tate (by some people). And, in tiny circles, I have celebrity status. The point about female narcissism stands. Guys like Tate and I can only deal with a limited amount of ladies. We don't have to seem like the nicest guys. We do not have to be born with the most at…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 05:52 PM
1

Politicians, actors, celebrities, gurus, etc portray the personality they want you to see. It's OK to dislike a persona. It's silly to dislike the acting in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 05:36 PM
3

Do you hate all actors?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 04:32 AM
1

I'm bald. No one ever even mentions it. No problem with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 01:30 AM
1

Some women will perform better at sex during a hookup than other women in a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 04:02 PM
1

Most people commenting are wrong. The original post is wrong too. The logical fallacy is "false choice". Sometimes casual sex is better than relationship sex because some women are better at sex than others (regardless of the duration of the relationship). Some women get better at sex over time. Some will always think sex is taboo or dirty and don't get better. Some women perform better when a relationship is new based on infatuation and lust. Even the most inhibited women will have sex on the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 03:22 PM
1

Probably incorrect. I think you're forgetting to compare women to each other. Woman 1: 5/10 relationship sex. Woman 2: 8/10 sex the first time. Maybe both women get better over time (in your experience). Nonetheless, if woman 2 is a hookup, her sex is better than woman 1's
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 02:58 PM
1

I want to add one more thing I found. After you get all your facts right with citations, understand that most people will still shut down and disregard your line of thinking if it conflicts with their feelings. When I debate politics, for example, I list short concise statements and provide links to the legislation as well as studies to show the impact of it. You will probably experience that if you're THAT well-prepared, people will only be able to respond with logical fallacies or simply shut …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:06 PM
1

You raise some good points! To answer most of them, I'm just referring to basic rules related to formal debate, and storytelling or giving a speech, and logical fallacies. Please review the respective guidelines. I took the time to determine whether or not I agreed with each rule. For example, I reject "appeal to nature" as a logical fallacy. My goal in criticizing your comments is really to help you. The pattern in your comments has me speculating that you are willing and able to improve (over …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 02:45 PM
1

Please READ what YOU have written in comments before responding. Most of what you're writing I can agree with ... to an extent. But, it's trite. Stop worrying about what other people are thinking and refine your own thoughts. Your thinking is all over the place. That may be a good thing if you can organize your thoughts. Are you smart enough to provide your own counter arguments? Just go through your cliche' statements one at a time and try your best to argue an opposing point of view. That exer…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:12 PM
1

As you should. Enjoy it while it lasts and grow marketable skills. At some point, consider having him list his goals in life and help him accomplish them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 09:58 AM
2

I agree with your line of thinking. It's easy to prove men are generally happier than women though. For a lot of men, just having consistent sex is enough. It doesn't even have to be good sex. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 09:56 AM
1

Obviously, people think about them and discuss them. Ironically, YOU are not thinking because you are making the assertion that people felt bored, etc. Please review what you wrote; You're making statements about how people feel (and it matches how you feel) which is projecting. It's arrogant to think others don't think about these issues especially when your argument isn't well thought out and doesn't use any citations whatsoever. That said, it's good that you're at least trying. I recommend yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 09:52 AM
2

That's what I picked up. She's in her prime (and will likely leave him). I'd classify her as a live-in hoe not a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 05:27 PM
1

To be fair, considering the divorce rate, most wives amount to stay at home girlfriends. lol The difference is that if they stay long enough or have enough kids, they are more expensive after they leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:10 PM
1

To be fair to you, I'm also a cynic. I just have enough EQ not to project my attitude on society. Individual Nihilism is defendable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:08 PM
1

He may be a simp. Or, more likely, you're really good in bed. Wait; Could be both. Or, perhaps he just wants the daddy daughter dynamic that you all have. Just don't get too much older, fatter, or worse in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 04:05 PM
3

Good point. Women have difficulty being happy with a man if he doesn't help her be happy. Happiness itself is not the norm for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 11:41 AM
2

"People traditionally reproduced because" .... what? Did you interview these people? citation needed. You definitely have an unusual perception of reality, biology, sociology, and psychology. Somehow 2022 is so interesting people stopped having kids as much? Are you (a depressed) affluent 18 year old? Do you take medication for your mood? I'm really wondering what your background is. Your comments seem to come from a place of imaginary pain or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 02:05 PM
13

You're a stay at home girlfriend ... for now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 08:34 AM
2

My life, like others, fluctuates with regard to emotional state. If I understand correctly, you've made a bizarre leap that people have children because they're unhappy. I hope your life gets happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 08:28 AM
3

I think your underlying point may be valid, however, it needs to be modified a bit. I think it is fair to say women are generally unhappy with reality. That tracks with the mental health prescriptions and the sentiment at r/FemaleDatingStrategy That said; Something seems off about your thought process in the comments. I think I'll shut up now since I'm not sure what your mental/emotional state is. Something's off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:09 AM
5

Count the logical fallacies. Dare; Drink every time you read one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 12:27 AM
1

Error. There are plenty of potential mates. Don't settle for one that tells you "No" (a lot). Instead, find someone that is so compatible with you that's they say "Yes" . I'd rather be with someone that says "Yes" 90% of the time than someone who says "No" 90% of the time. Why settle for less "Yes"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:15 PM
2

Correct. Easiest way to avoid being Dylan is to only date ladies that have sex on the first or second date with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:23 PM
1

Why choose a lady that does nothing or a lady that needs external stimulation? Ladies (and men) that do things AND that satisfy themselves exist. You offered a false choice (which is a logical fallacy) and a strawman (another logical fallacy) to support your position. Men can choose better
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:32 AM
1

It's just a compatibility thang. Men should skip the ladies like you and simply keep the ladies that are naturally more aroused, agreeable, and attracted. Why should they settle for less?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:28 AM
1

Men, please keep in mind that some women need your help to enjoy sex and to orgasm. Other women don't. Simply drop the sexually inhibited women. Yes; It may take extra dating (work) but it's worth it. The last thing you want is someone like OP who thinks they are a "good lover" but can't even please herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:55 PM
1

Wrong. Each person is responsible for their own happiness in life. Likewise, each person is responsible for their own happiness with sex. Arguably, the underlying problem is that women have difficulty making themselves happy. If you need evidence, review discussions on women led forums and the statistics on mental health medications. Men do not need to be responsible for women's happiness any more than women are responsible for men's happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 03:49 PM
-3

Women aren't as good with guns. Besides, last I checked, women are heavily medicated so they can deal with life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 07:24 PM
1

smallstarseeker isn't smart. Disengage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 02:11 AM
2

The information is freely available. You do NOT need to go to that specific site to get it. I'm guessing that you're just avoiding seeing the info (so you're making an excuse about a "scary" squeeze page). You're not fooling anyone. Ironically, I'm finding your post to be in bad faith (i.e. untrustworthy). Just give me a (willfully ignorant) blank stare next time. lol Anyway, the info is available and I hope it's useful to those who actually care about communication in relationships. I found it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 02:59 PM
7

Uh ... Are you implying Google only returned ONE result? The reason I suggest people Google is so that they can choose the source they prefer. Try: "Gottman four horseman stonewalling criticism defensiveness contempt" You'll continue to have problems in relationships if your Google-Fu is weak. ;) Joke aside, you'll probably really find this information extremely useful. It directly explains why communication is important (and how to do it). Also, there is a great video on Youtube where Gottman g…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:11 PM
32

Blank stare? Google "Gottman stonewalling". Gottman did decades of studies and found stonewalling was 1 of 4 ways to predict relationship failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 01:23 PM
9

Error. You're willfully ignoring the fact that women openly admit/complain about their experience with Chads. The reality is that men and women complain about the same issue (a Chad differently). The fantasy is what you're perceiving.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 09:22 PM
1

Why does it matter what makes you or anyone else happy? Happy is happy. Explain why loving plants is superior to loving pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:07 AM
1

Learn about the history of marriage (and women's rights). Women offer far less than they have historically).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 04:41 AM
1

You're trying too hard. Why not go further? Slaves still exist and they are unable to call their mates. lol The point that OP made is the same point I am making. If you're dating, you can choose a mate that is able to communicate. Full stop. That is the point you're missing. Early in the dating process you can simply choose those that are WILLING and ABLE to text you! Again; The reason you don't know this axiom is because you are inexperienced in this regard. And, I support you bringing up love …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 01:11 AM
1

Do you notice how you felt the need to use a strawman argument? I definitely didn't take the position that someone needs to "whip out their phone for hours at a time". Ironically, it's the higher paid jobs where I've seen women less available. That's because, like you, those women prioritized their corporate jobs over their relationships and family. In any case, I've found that people are able to text back at least once even on busy days. Did you forget employment laws exist that give people bre…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:00 PM
1

We don't disagree. Ever heard, "No one is too busy, it's all about priorities"? We agree that you and others prioritize work. All I'm doing is confirming that and pointing out that there IS a healthy way for people to prioritize theirs relationships. You're struggling with this. It's probably because you haven't experienced it. If you had, you wouldn't take the position you are taking. Think about all the times you've heard older people explain why caring about others is more valuable than carin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:25 PM
1

I understand your perspective. It comes from you never being the highest priority or prioritizing someone else very highly. Some people prioritize their corporate job (and do not have time to respond to texts). Others, like you simply make a rule that being very responsive is wrong. I've experienced various relationships. I personally don't mind if someone doesn't respond quickly. However, I have observed that when my significant other values me very highly, they make me a priority, and they fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 01:43 AM
1

I dodge the boundary bullets. There's always a higher quality woman than you that doesn't value arbitrary rules like that over me. When someone likes you, they don't look for and make rules around saying "No" . Instead, their focus is on how they can say "Yes".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 09:48 AM
6

"Money is not important" is virtue signaling
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:29 PM
1

DC Sniper; Review.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:13 PM
4

The DC Sniper and others like him just laughed from the grave. You may want to review the details before commenting on the Internet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:08 PM
2

Tell us that you completely missed the time where 2 men with a sniper rifle locked down the US capital without telling us. 12 snipers nationwide using $2K rifles and randomized shootings could halt the entire nation. How did the DC Sniper get caught? He TOLD them how to catch him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:06 PM
1

We agree on this point. If we disagree on a "No", we're not compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 10:00 PM
1

What does she say to those who don't match her preferences? "No." Why didn't you see that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 09:02 PM
1

Quick example: My current mate says "No" to dating anyone that is not my race, gender, sexual orientation, and location. Are you really here trying to argue that she would have a more healthy relationship with someone who does not match her preferences? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 07:32 PM
1

I think you're just arguing for the sake of argument. Would you rather have a relationship where you hear "No" 20 times per day or 1 time per day on average? Which relationship is more naturally compatible, one where there is a lot of agreements or where there is a lot of disagreements? Are you really unable to imagine a relationship where everything "just fits"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 07:20 PM
1

It isn't abusive when it naturally occurs. THINK. In your best relationship experience you heard and said "No" less often. Everything just clicked. "No" was not needed or desired. Contrast that by thinking about someone you dislike. "No" is fundamental. Just think it through. One day, you'll meet someone that is so compatible, you will see each other as "10s" and "No" will not really exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 04:14 PM
1

Just because you have not experienced it doesn't mean it's not real. Hopefully, one day you'll experience that level of compatibility, acceptance, infatuation, and love.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 09:25 AM
1

Everyone who makes rules breaks them under the right conditions. Remember the OP? Then, debate in the context of the OP. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 12:48 AM
1

When someone treats you like a "10", you'll never hear "No". It's not just sex, it's everything else too. I pity the fact that you don't know that (because you probably haven't experienced it).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 12:46 AM
3

We care about behavior patterns
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 11:41 AM
0

Men and women should hold out for those who are attractive and agreeable. She is not agreeable or treating him like a "10". She treated other men that way. In the future, she will likely treat other men like they are a "10". Religion, boundaries, and other arbitrary rules get broken or forgotten when it suits people. If she valued him more highly, she would have sex with him, period. He can and should do better for himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 11:40 AM
2

Yes! But, I'd go farther than that. There is no confusion here. There is nothing more to learn. He is not being treated like he is a "10" He should simply hold out for a lady who does treat him like a "10", or perhaps go to therapy (so that he can deal with that issue). There are surely more attractive and more agreeable ladies. Find one and drop this pseudo-Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 11:33 AM
1

I say that love is conditional. I know what my conditions (preferences) are. Spend an hour a day listing and reviewing your preferences. Spend more time studying the methodologies and scoring techniques for psychological assessment tests. Write the code for your own dating system. Get to the point where you can assess behavior patterns dynamically. Then go farther. Learn how we live in systems and the systems have behavior patterns. Algorithms run everything. Results become far more predictable.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 03:56 PM
1

Forget about gender. Just think in terms of quantifying dating market value. All other things being equal, one potential mate treats you like a 10, the other treats you like a 6. Which do you pick? I pick the one that treats me like a 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 03:21 PM
1

It's too easy to argue the opposing view. Just think about dating as sequential events. Even with the "action ", its s simple as completing tasks desired by the people the relationship. Think more detailed and critically about what you're experiencing step-by-step. Given enough events you will be able to have everything you countered with AND move faster. I hope you have experienced "love at first sight". If you haven't, I'm not sure you experienced love at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 08:18 PM
1

We can agree to disagree on all those points. Are you overlooking Tinder (which was about same day hookups)? What does TV reflect if not reality? When does anyone truly experience "an average" relationship? What is love? I define it as "acceptance" and "action". If a mate accepts you completely, they will have sex with you (and take action to stay with you). They will give you a lot of compliments (because they really like your attributes). They will tell you secrets. They will even go directly …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 03:19 PM
1

I date differently. One lady was celebrate for 3.5 years, proposed to me and has sex before our first date. We were married 13 years. Later, I met and married a lady within one month. I tell ladies upfront that I have sex within the first two dates on the first phone call. I don't even bother going on a first date until it feels like a 2+ year relationship. I use multiple psychological assessment tests prior to meeting in person. I use those tools to articulate their underlying fears, motivation…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 11:21 AM
2

Thanks for explaining that. I didn't know why OP had such a dumb perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 03:11 PM
3

I'm male; Please don't lump me in with the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 03:08 PM
3

I've done it. It doesn't cost anything. Saying free agreeable words is too much to attract a mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 08:21 PM
2

I'm like that ... but not for the reasons you may think. Being a male feminist or gender egalitarian can easily align with being red pilled. Think it through; Are you able to see how?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 08:13 PM
0

I got something in return. It impressed a lady who became my wife. It also works for the other subjects you listed. It works, even if you haven't observed it. "The Social Dilemma" explains WHY it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 08:07 PM
7

I strongly disagree. Behavior patterns are incredibly hard to change. For example, there's an obesity epidemic because people can't even NOT eat too much. Rather than attempting to improve oneself, accept yourself. Study marketing and psychology. Run marketing campaigns to get yourself noticed by more women. Eventually, a woman will accept you as-is. There are literally people in prison able to get mates. There are fake accounts able to con women into sending MILLIONS of dollars. There's a whole…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 03:06 PM
1

Men, offer a relationship and commit to a lady that doesn't trade sex for money (and dates). The lady that really loves you and will not reject you inside the relationship will have sex with you on the first date and every day after. You can simply talk to them over the phone for hours to get to know them well enough to determine if they are worth meeting. Leave the ladies that would deny you (or make you pay for their love and time) in the dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 02:13 PM
5

She's not honest and cannot handle your logic. Your logic is sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 05:03 AM
3

ditto And, I'll drop ladies who won't have sex with me on the first date on the basis that they don't like me (or sex) enough. Disclaimer: I talk to them for hours over the phone before the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:57 AM
2

All that matters is that men generally -prefer- younger women. That desire alone is enough to support your myth. It can still give women the feeling that their man settled for less.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 02:13 PM
1

That's very inefficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:02 PM
1

Correct. She basically told me not to trust her. I agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 09:53 PM
2

You should be looking fun at their "appeal to authority" logical fallacy instead. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:42 PM
2

Well, the rich man "should" not be trying to marry. I guess I have more exposure to successful men who may be more reluctant to marry. Fun fact; I've been married twice and still don't see the point (of an older rich man marrying). In fact, one of the main reasons I filed for divorce is due to forthcoming financial success. And, I'm not even legally divorced yet and someone wants to marry me. I just see a marriage license as a type of business license. I'd get married a 3rd time, if it made good…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:49 PM
1

Yes. Sorry, but with my background, I see dating through marketing and sales lenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:36 PM
0

The mistake here is thinking that the man will objectify himself and fail to objectify women. Do you really believe men are thinking "Once I get rich, a woman will love me"? Or, do you think men are thinking "Once I get rich, women will be like a commodity?" I'm not even sure "trophy wives " are a thing anymore (considering the popularity of RP and MGTOW-like info).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:43 PM
1

Yes; People often make the mistake of thinking that statistics that apply to a group rigidly apply to each individual. The older man (who really desires a young lady) just has to convince one young lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:36 PM
1

Nice strawman!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 03:53 PM
2

In reality, an individual 49 year old man can easily date women between 34 and 60. Younger men simply do not have that range.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 03:46 PM
1

I know; That's part of what makes it funny. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 01:39 AM
1

Some men get women to pay the majority of expenses. I'm "Chad enough" to get ANY relationship model I want. Typically, I'm pitching an egalitarian relationship. People don't think hard enough with regard to what a "traditional" relationship actually is. Give me the benefit of a woman's free labor (like a truly traditional relationship) and I'll pay for everything. lol Traditional is not "A man provides and protects and the woman only has the responsibilities that she temporarily agrees to". That…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:06 PM
1

Go back to FDS ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 10:45 PM
2

She IS "getting it". Her username checks out! lol She just lost count!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 01:25 PM
9

Keep dating . . . It took me decades to experience love bombing followed by narcissism. I didn't even know it was a real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 01:24 AM
3

Yes! Girls "pick themselves up" every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:14 PM
1

I find that none of that matters. It takes work to maintain the social masks, and they drop when things go bad or very good. Ultimately, it's easy to ignore religion and politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:07 PM
4

Think harder. It's far more efficient for you to list your opinions in writing, share the list with 10,000 ladies, and allow 9,990 disqualify you out of the gate. Having 10,000 repeat conversations is . . . well, if you like to hear yourself talk, then that's a good reason to repeat yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 05:03 PM
5

Username does NOT check out!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:46 PM
1

You just ended her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 03:25 PM
1

Yes. Of course, she's "doing the most". lol CS major with ADHD and is also a stripper or something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 03:14 PM
1

What if she's just bad at sex? He wanted to stay with her, but . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 05:30 PM
2

Think harder. Pretend you had to make the argument that RP is really about individuals. Could you do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:41 PM
1

OK In that case, I'll magically think you didn't write any of that. An individual's personal perception is the entirety of reality; Solipsism. I'll buy that. Thinking magically is delicious!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 11:51 PM
1

Solipsism? If so, OK. At some point, overall observable realistic results matter more than an individual's perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 11:47 PM
1

You just doubled down on your logical fallacy. Do you comprehend the fallacy and the lesson it teaches? Do you realize that, at best, your observation is as valid as the observation made via studies? Do you value the formality generally found with studies? Do you realize there may be more than one study?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 11:36 PM
-1

Money has a much higher priority than sex. In fact, I posit that, generally, women (who often have lower libidos than men) care less about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:43 PM
2

We, or I should say, "you", already ended with your anecdotal evidence. Ironically, the "one study" still has more merit than your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:39 PM
1

. . and cut her hair?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 02:03 AM
2

complete-temporary can be both unhappy AND right. His fundamental point has merit. Moreover, the fact that you use yourself as the example can be dismissed as a logical fallacy. Finally, his point about water being wet was an excellent rebuttal to your arrogant statement while bringing it up. And, all your comments lead to the question, "Do you REALLY love the man? (It really sounds like you are confusing the effects of the drugs with love). I mean, if I recall correctly, you suggested he take a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:00 PM
1

Your EQ is too low to pose the question in good faith. Make your point and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:13 PM
2

No it doesn't; Everyone is willfully ignorant. For example, Black people just voted for THE most racist individual politician since slavery (for president). No individual politician has done more to increase systemic racism against Black people than Joe Biden, specifically. And, even though the information is all public record, people largely ignore it and do not realize that Biden was behind all of it. 70s, 1984, 86, 88, 92, 94, 07. That's just one example. "The Social Dilemma" explains reasons…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:44 PM
3

Part of their frustration comes from you being inarticulate. The way discussions and debates work is the person asserting a position defends it rather than saying "Just Google". At least make a short list that can be Googled rather than wasting the same number of keystrokes arguing that you don't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:35 PM
1

Watch "The Social Dilemma" and rethink your entire comment
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:29 PM
2

Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:18 PM
1

Marriage is a tool. All weapons are tools too. As a woman, I simply wouldn't expose someone I loved to the risk of marriage. I "get" why it's a good deal for women. I also get why you felt you have done due diligence. I get the fact that most people don't feel that the negative statistics related to divorce won't apply to them. As a woman, you generally have less risk. Good deal! (Don't hate the player, hate the game, right?) Fast forward 15 years ...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:48 PM
1

Most women are. If I was a woman and really didn't love my mate, I'd want the standard marriage contract too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:23 PM
2

A marriage license is "just a (crazy) contract". There are other contracts that have the same effect (and are better because the individuals can set the terms). The "feel comfortable" is really your primary concern. However, there are other ways to convey security
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 12:02 PM
3

I'd ask you to "sell" the benefits that only a marriage license (and not other contracts) can provide. I haven't heard anyone that knows enough about contracts be able to justify the marriage license
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:57 AM
2

A marriage license does not guarantee people won't be flaky. Most divorces are filled by women. Since you're so rigid, I'd wager you would crack under the pressure of a long term marriage and flake/divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:55 AM
2

Same without the license
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:50 AM
1

Most divorces are filled by women. It sounds like you want a willfully ignorant man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:48 AM
-1

Offer alternative contracts to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:42 AM
8

Paternity tests exist
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:41 AM
2

What gmoney92 is saying has some merit. However, you can dismiss what they are saying. Remember, you only need one woman. It's not that hard to find a woman to meet your specs. I made a list of 187 preferences and found women that met those specs. (I love brainstorming and writing lists about various subjects). You can be successful by writing a to-do list that is in line with your preferences and successfully find a mate. You only need one woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 04:21 AM
3

OK I won't argue the logic. Something is wrong. I'll give up now and guess you do not have some profound insight. I was really looking forward to it though. Last ditch effort: Can anyone else here articulate flowerwoven's logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:53 AM
1

Username checks out?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 03:32 AM
3

No. Your logic is not correct. She did not leave me. I left her. I'm not trying to be argumentative. I really hope you can clarify what you mean. Someone that sets aside their preferences and even tolerates physical pain typically has low self-esteem. People with high self-esteem don't tolerate abuse. People with high self-esteem hold their own preferences in high regard. Can you please teach me what you really mean? Something is very unclear (which is why you're getting all these questions). I …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 01:20 AM
5

I'm trying to understand your logic also. I have experienced a lady that loved me a lot but did not like giving head (in part, because she had braces that caused her pain). Aside from blowjobs, her actions showed me that she loved me. I'm trying to understand your views. It sounds like you are describing someone with very low self-esteem. Is that it? (Are you basically saying that if someone loves you enough, they won't care about their own needs, feelings, preferences, or even their own physica…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 01:07 AM
2

I write the code for the tests and understand the scoring. I'll explain here for you roughly. I'm not intending to be precise here. I'm just creating a model to communicate the concepts. Imagine the MBTI I/E score is a range of -10 to 10. The test score results are on a bell curve. Most score results are grouped around 0. When some people retake the test, their score goes from -1 to 1; From I to E. On the other hand, it is unlikely that the -9 scores become 9 scores on the retaking of the test. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:57 AM
2

Google. THERE IS A CORRELATION between the tests. You can find studies to support that concept. If 5 Factor is scientifically valid AND MBTI is correlated to 5 Factor . . . Understand that I write the code for the tests and know the underlying scoring system.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 07:53 AM
2

You're wrong. I write the code for these tests and I'm currently developing a comprehensive assessment test to prove the PhDs wrong. There is a correlation between 5 Factor and the other models. There is merit to the complaints by the PhDs, however, many of the things problems are easily solved (in the open source community). I have been archiving the blog posts by the PhDs repeating the misinformation with the intent of providing data, solutions, and modern studies that show they are wrong. Eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 08:27 PM
3

What if you learned there is a correlation between 5Factor and MBTI? What if you understood how the scoring works?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 07:18 PM
1

That's not it. It's simply pattern recognition. Just read the FDS handbook. Read the comments. Reverse the genders and see how many FDS women would accept their own standards. It's OK if a subset of (FDS) women have behavior patterns that have a LOT of similarities to the avoidant-dissmissive pattern. Likewise, it's OK if there are similarities between narcissism and being avoidant-dissmissive. If you are unable to list the similarities, you may simply have a problem with pattern recognition. NA…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:51 PM
1

Do you have any studies to support that? It really seems like most women want the lifestyle of a spoiled teenager.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:45 PM
1

Please provide any links to the studies. I'll try to find it myself also. I'm very interested in learning more! I've never heard that (and it not be debunked). Nonetheless, my point stands. In good faith, I suggest you learn what avoidant-dissmissive means. Learn more about narcissism too. Learn the causes, mentality, behavior pattern. Once you get a clear understanding of the patterns, read FDS for a week. You will see overwhelming proof of the attitudes and patterns! Super interesting! Full di…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 09:46 PM
0

No. I'm just pointing out that FDS women exist. You claimed anyone who thinks that way exist. I just showed you where the exist en masse. You can review, see the proof, and change your downvote to an upvote! 😜
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 09:37 PM
-3

Tell us that you haven't read FDS without saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:52 PM
1

A person can have a low self-esteem AND act entitled and have an inflated ego. Learn more about psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:44 PM
3

I've never heard that one! I just empty every pocket. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 07:22 PM
1

She nose what she's talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 06:14 PM
26

Yes. Ford, specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 06:10 PM
4

It's almost as though the quality guys and women match up and leave. Imagine if the quality is the same online and offline . . . and there is attrition online and offline. There is nothing magical about being offline, Boomer. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 06:09 PM
19

It's almost as though there is more than one type of man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 06:05 PM
1

Strange. I've seen the opposite. Many men who are smart avoid women altogether. Those that deal with women typically choose women that match them intellectually. I'm talking about average couples, not celebrities or the super rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 08:49 PM
2

Think outside the "box" (pun intended) For example, sometimes in fraternity culture, men will have sex with more women just as competition. And, install women are not always reliable for sex. Sometimes it is better to have sex with agreeable women with low self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:47 AM
8

You missed the point. Chad is just using you. If you don't know that, you're delusional. If you like being used, that is an issue someone can bring to your attention. Cue someone pointing out that women don't hold themselves accountable . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 09:49 PM
3

That's because you have a relatively low value for sex. Pretend sex is communication, attentiveness, quality time, money, or whatever you value more. Is it "shitty" if a woman leaves or cheats after her husband doesn't speak to her for several months? Hope that helps
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 02:59 PM
7

They are just talking about pregnancy. You are talking about marriage. Your strawman is saying "men are forced into marriage". No one is saying that. Their point is "Western women have the force in pregnancy"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 02:53 PM
1

Tell me how you willfully ignore millions of women that are very happy with the fact that their husband can spend less than $100K per year without saying that . . . A man can pull quality (agreeable and attractive) women while on food stamps, or living in their sister's couch, or homeless, or while separated, or while having a contagious fungus on their genitals . . . without the $100K per year. But, if a man can spend $1000 on a woman per month . . . he can pull 2 women. lol It seems you're out…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 05:19 AM
3

Are you trolling or obtuse? What percentage of people can comfortably SPEND $100K per YEAR? How many women does a man need to satisfy the requirements of the OP? All? 100K? 100? 10? Do you really believe that money (used to help make a woman's dreams come true) has little control over women, while women still work hard for money and often wish to be stay at home and be financially free? Are you watching too much Star Trek (where money often doesn't matter) or something? It's like you flat out le…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 05:04 AM
1

Anyone can have misperceptions (regardless of race). That's why I typically go out of my way to include citations (of historical facts).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:42 AM
4

I don't agree with your observations or soeculations here, but I think we agree on the overall sentiment. Unfortunately, Blacks are more monolithic than Is like.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:39 AM
-1

Learn about attachment styles. Perhaps they want a man who is avoidant-dissmissive and you're anxious-preoccupied. Race and crime are probably irrelevant. Study psychology a bit or date different demographics so that you can see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:35 AM
-1

I understand you more now. You're confused. The fact that some women want assertive, dominant, men who exert physical pain does not necessarily have to do with race. And, you're misunderstanding their desire. Are they asking you to commit crimes? Do they tell you they prefer criminals? Moreover, if you want ladies who don't prefer you be that way, simply follow my previous suggestion. I have experienced what you're describing. I think you're deeply mistaken on several issues here. . Just stick w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:31 AM
4

I strongly recommend you stop referring to yourself that way. Instead, immediately correct those that would label you that way. Moreover, you may want to spend more time around Blacks where there isn't any demand for thugs. Generally, simply hanging around those that are relatively more educated and rich will work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 05:59 PM
12

You're not Black, right? Try telling the truth about politics, religion, systemic racism, or LGTBQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 05:50 PM
2

You would have to go there and observe it yourself. The videos you saw were edited. What if the average people go to different clubs? What if the bouncers only let in the hottest people? What if 8 hours of footage is edited to 5 - 30 minutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 01:40 PM
5

Nearly ALL videos are edited.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 01:36 PM
1

It makes some sense why you watch it. It makes very little sense that you heavily promote it (and help them earn money and increase their voice).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:49 PM
8

The existence of "Chad" is irrelevant. If a lady likes you enough, she'll have sex with you quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 06:30 PM
1

12% COMPLETLY undermines OP's point! "Statistically speaking." Now, go correct OP's grammar . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 03:18 AM
2

Metoo died when they gleefully supported Biden.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 04:23 PM
3

Neoliberal ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 04:03 PM
1

I'm just referring to the cliche stats related to relationship failures. They apply to "the vast majority of people in real life."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 07:16 PM
1

The stats say everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 05:55 PM
2

Awareness is one thing. Promotion is another. They are manipulating you into surrending time promoting their work. They even say that is what they are doing. I see you as being on their (promotions) team. I'll try to remember not to click the links you post. It's just hard to remember that on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 05:18 PM
1

You. You post a link without a title or anything, and people like me get Rickrolled into increasing their views. I want to be able to follow the conversation, so I click the link, only to find out that you're promoting the same thing repeatedly. You're using Reddit to help them repeatedly. Imma guess you done helped them get 50K views. They should put you on payroll.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 05:14 PM
2

They created the correct content to get people like YOU to repost it several times. I wouldn't even know these trolls exist if it weren't for your effort to promote them. I'll stop short of saying you're "obsessed" with them and want to have sex with them. (That's your thing.) Why do you work so much to help them get more views?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 05:07 PM
2

I'm not sure about the terrorists; Do YOU repeatedly repost their videos too?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 05:01 PM
1

He openly admitted that he was trolling for views. It worked. And, you repeatedly promote his videos for him. It's still working.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 02:20 PM
1

They openly admitted that they were trolling for views. It worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 01:56 PM
2

They openly admit they were trolling for views. It worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 01:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter