TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Adrewmc Archive

View 0 posts and 125 comments by Adrewmc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

The real answer is…to GET NORE WOMEN PLAYING CHESS…like it’s not nefarious, more men then women play chess and Big Chess wants the other half of the pie.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:24 PM
4

Because it’s a class issue, always has been. And who do you think the tippy top of the class always are…white men…how far down the list of the richest people in world do you have to go to get to a women…then to a Blackman then to a black women…. (It’s not as far as you think.) Now…people completely forget that the person on the very very bottom of that scale…can be any race, religion, or sex. So a white man is seen as privileged no matter what they do because they can be at the very top the real…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:10 PM
55

This actually the most unbelievably part…what company rewards merit? That’s not a thing.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 01:30 PM
5

Yeah that’s not what happened. You’re an international star that spends a lot of your time in hotel. As a process server it likely that on stage may have been one of the few times he knew exactly where she would be and could have had actual access to her. They are not going to be waiting for you in some hotel lobby that you go out the back. Or access to the private airplane field, or access to the after party, or access to etc etc. process servers have a time limit you know, the court date is on…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 09:48 AM
5

Always remember you can write post-nups, for situations do change over the course of a marriage. And sometimes those changes are drastic enough to through out a prenup that wasn’t aware of it. Child custody is always a separate suit, and your agreements really mean nothing. You have legal obligation toward your child that you can not simply sign away.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:46 PM
1

Who says a judge that elected needs to be a lawyer? Do t they just have to be elected and they get the job.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:50 PM
1

We should mention the top 3 ways men and women kill themselves. (USA 2012 ) Firearm 58% Hanging 25% Poison/OD (men tend to use CO poisoning much more) 11% And for women Poison/OD 36% (Drugs much more) Hanging 31% Firearm 23% These 3 accounts for 91.5% of male suicides. And 91% of women suicides. When taken together. Surprisingly, both men and women cut themselves about the same percentage (just shy of 2%), and women are twice as likely to drown themselves. Unsurprisingly, there is not one method…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 02:33 AM
2

Write it all down man. For real. That’s the best medicine a little self reflection.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 02:29 AM
23

Every single sexual harassment law starts with the words “unwanted”...
/r/MensRights16/05/21 01:24 PM
8

But if a person uses their money and resources to help their partner become more successful at the expense of their own money/career...with the expectation that the partnership will last in perpetuity and they immediately break up and use that advances then one partner has been damaged, and should be repaired. That’s how damages work in court. My view is that legally the limit should be very clear and have a defined end. And the type of damages, child raising without work, education, career put …
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:10 PM
3

It’s stuff like maintenance. Some people work while their partner improves themselves (read get an education.) Others will raise the children while their partner pays the bills. Now when separating, the partner who didn’t get the benefits of having someone pay the bills while they got an education is at a disadvantage, the partner that didn’t work for 5 years is at a disadvantage. And that disadvantage was because of the marriage. While I would allow some alimony, it absolutely needs limits. Say…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:49 PM
5

Not gonna lie you had me in the first half.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:52 PM
15

To protect one of most valuable crowd drawing actors in the word over a no name minor actress...it just would make sense economically to keep a household name actor and throw the no body under the bus, I mean a pretty face is a dime a dozen in Hollywood.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:40 PM
20

Probably didn’t think they could really analyze it down there. Like yeah sure, make sure my vagina was stabbed by someone else? What you going to do pull down my pants and check it? Well yes...it’s literally your defend of a murder charge. And also you know we will have to patch it up regardless.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 05:38 PM
2

How about we don’t teach kids about hitting each other and instead teach them how to appropriately deal with tough situations as they will be in them eventually. Conflict resolution, anger management, morals values and civics.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 02:54 AM
1

Spousal support is nonsense. Make sure they have the life they are used to but the other spouse has to live in less even though they are the one that worked. I like Texas solution, there is a maximum amount period and there is a maximum time frame period. Yeah if you were a housewife for ten years it can take a few years to get back into the work force with a decent pay, but with $400,000,000 you can have a decent pay just on interest alone, shit 0.1% would yield 400,000 a year. No spousal suppo…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 12:35 AM
1

Dude you literally claimed Alinsky wrote to and for the powerful. And I’m the clueless one here. Read both books (though it’s been a few years I admit). Alinsky was the real deal? Stop he wrote plainly without much in-depth (at least Rule for Radical) discussion. It’s written in a way for people to understand. He was the real deal in the way of he was actually a political organizer. Attack the otherwise is the weakest of arguments. You literally changed sides in this thread...as I stated below. …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:42 PM
1

When dealing with fighting the powers that be, it would be impossible to not mention them, just as Machiavelli mentions the masses, they are the opposition of each other. But to say Alinsky was writing about the powerful is a bit of stretch. Even making him into a psychopath is a stretch claiming he though everyone with or wanted power is a psychopath is a stretch. When you write about boats you have to mention water and what it does, it doesn’t mean you’re writing about water.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:36 PM
1

From the prince first page Take then, your Magnificence, this little gift in the spirit in which I send it; wherein, if it be diligently read and considered by you, you will learn my extreme desire that you should attain the greatness which fortune and your other attributes promise. And if your Magnificence from the summit of your greatness will sometimes turn your eyes to these lower regions, you will see how unmerited my I suffer a great and continued malignity of fortune. So he directly wrote…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 07:25 PM
1

Did you just quote me quoting you and then dismiss your own point there? Looks like it. The original point is that Alinsky is a psychopath who thinks everyone who matters or wants to matter is or ideally was a psychopath - whilst Machiavelli comes across as a fantasy theorist. Yeah but neither of those are true... Machiavelli didn’t write fantasy, he wrote about real world examples. There’s no fantasy in that. He may have been a bit misguided and took wrong conclusions here and there but wasn’t …
/r/MensRights23/05/20 06:59 PM
2

Churchill was dead when “Rules for Radicals” was written so he wasn’t part of who Alinsky was writing for. He spoke of him because he was part of power that be that he specifically fought against, Churchill was not the “Radical” by Alinsky standards. While there will be leaders that bring change that Alinsky would have supported to say they were the intended audience is simply false. Alinsky was writing for grassroots not for kings and queens, but Machiavelli was writing for actual Kings and que…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:57 PM
3

Machiavelli “The Prince” was mostly a historical document, with plethoras of real world examples. He asked many question beyond the one “Is it better to be feared than love?” It was wasn’t a fantasy theorist, it was hugely impactful and well researched book. You just have to remember he had a lot of work to do just to find references let alone use them. Alinsky wrote about being an on the ground fighter against power. He was a community organizer. He wasn’t writing to the president, and casual g…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:07 PM
5

Well the ambulances did come.... But you know the access to mental health is not really available and is stigmatized for men...so... They are going to keep coming.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:42 PM
8

They only ruled that the will was a valid will and testament. However, there are certain things in the law that may come into play. Writing out the child may not be completely possible depending on the age (adult children can an have been written out of wills), as he still has a duty to care for the child even after death in some instances, the amount varies. It would depend on the jurisdiction and local laws. But, it also means that the ones named in the will would also have great claim to the …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:59 AM
2

I was stating it as arrest being a deprived of liberty specifically the freedom of movement. Once detained you are under arrest, there is a distinction between an simply arrested person and one in custody (physically restrained or within a prison type dwelling. I considered a detainment to be an arrest. The police can arrest you for a lot of things but can't bring you into custody for everything they can arrest you for. In America there is leeway for the cops to accomplish their job. This is why…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 03:27 AM
14

Depends. Okay imagine your a cop and you come to scene of a crime let's say some guy is bloody on the ground has to go to the hospital. There are a dozen people there. At that point the cop may wish to arrest all of them and question them in order to figure out what happened. At that point is would be illegal for you to leave, your not necessarily going to jail but you are still detained and under arrest. You are in that group but really are just a passerby wasn't there when it happened but saw …
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:46 PM
4

I was raised that is bad to hit anyone, unless in self-defense.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:54 AM
1

Irrelevant. Wait that actually works for both POV.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:52 AM
-1

I doubt it. Most common law marriages aren't civil but criminal statements. This opens up domestic crimes to the partners. It usually doesn't mean you have the same liabilities if you break up. While a true common law marriage is possible it requires you to do certain things namely say that you are married (like on an IRS form).
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:37 AM
2

See as most people in the Us are not in a union they could just be fired for. A no call no show. And the union worker will probably also not be approved by the union as the union represents everyone not just women. And union go on strike for a specific purpose not feel good reasons.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:22 PM
2

You know a lot of subside has to do with money issue (and dumb people thinking life insurance pays out for suicide, it doesn't). So if you are feeling bad and your broke you simply can't go to a psychologist, as they are expensive. While a barber is someone that people go to anyway. Giving them basic training at identifying and talking to people about these things is absolutely a good thing because it usually end with the barber saying hey you may you need to get some professional help about thi…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:54 AM
0

I openly admitted that I'm not doing quite as much physically as my counterparts Disrespectful to your counterparts, trust me they noticed. So telling people to fight for more money, especially when they don't need more money It's not about need it's ultimately about being paid appropriately for the work you do. While you may have all you need some of your counter part may not (kids, medical bills etc) because you don't attempt to make more then this allows the company to pay everyone less, if y…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:13 PM
-3

I don't respect you. It's not because you a women. It because you're making excuses not to negotiate for better pay. That's detrimental to your self interest. I read this like a suggest to just be okay with whatever you get. Fuck that, fight for your money, as I boss I want you to fight for your money so I know you will fight for the company's, it's that simple. Trying to say well umm there are all these little things fuck that. The biggest reason people are not paid more is simply because they …
/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:07 PM
21

We don't need to rate other men. Women do that for us. It's easy to see if you look whom is the alpha male when you have several females around...it the guy that the girls are talking to no matter how fucking dumb. They say guys are superficial, when in reality it's the opposite women are far more superficial about looks than men. Every study I've seen has men rating about 50% of the female populous as attractive, while women put about 15-20% of the male populous as attractive. And it seriously …
/r/MensRights05/11/16 11:40 PM
1

Little of column A and little of column B.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:54 PM
7

People want a partner. A partner isn't someone that does everything for you, it's someone that helps you get things done. Sometime this is best done through working together and sometimes it's much better to separate the labor. This means, yeah someone usually cooks more often, someone usually cleans more often, some one usually handles the bills, someone make enough money for rent, someone does the shopping. It doesn't have to be what the stereotype is, but it can't be one partner doing everyth…
/r/MensRights11/09/16 12:53 AM
37

my favorite game is to act like i can't understand something very simple when a man is explaining it to me to see how dumb he thinks i am so you act stupid to see how stupid I think you are? This is a chicken and egg thing right? You say something stupid I'll explain it to you like you're stupid.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:16 AM
5

It's starting to change now that we have more evidence to show that domestic violence isn't just physical abuse it's always with mental abuse, they are IMHO inseparable. Unfortunately, some cop stations are not as forward as others. They ought to be pressing charges no matter what the guy says, it is irrelevant she broke the law against the state not (only) the man. The man is not right in his mind, and that is not completely his fault, abuse starts slow and build to severe, first it's a back ha…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 08:37 AM
37

No, they don't. And they should be trained not to care in this circumstance. Since these people have a child together this is easily be considered domestic violence (as more and more evidence show that abusive relationships have heavy mental burdens on the one abused, that they may be incapable of seeing how bad it is and even to the point that they blame themselves for the action it happens more than you think, 'I shouldn't have yelled at her, I shouldn't have had a friend over so late' etc), i…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:56 AM
3

Don't forget we all have high paying jobs, and are instantly respected in every situation, and have so many privileges you can't actually name them all.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:12 AM
1

The argument is that he had hidden bank accounts, this means she would have be unaware of the financial wellbeing of the other party. In a pre-nup that is very important, you can't hide from the other party that you have a lot of money or assets, and then have them sign a pre-nup about that money. The contract would be challengeable if she can prove these account were hidden from her at the time of signing. You have to tell your partner how wealthy you actually are before you have them sign a pr…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:46 AM
1

Umm...rape is a crime. You don't need the person's who was raped to charged them with it, it brought by the state. It's shouldn't be handled by schools that have no experience handling rape cases. Especially in college were sex is rampant and someone who regret a night shouldn't be able to ruin the life of the other person on their say-so. They need evidence. Schools usually don't have evidence rules close to that of courts. I heard stories where here-say was obvious, as in they let testimony in…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:22 AM
1

Because she claims to have seen a fraudulent passport stating he was 17. That's the issue in my mind. How much proof does a person reasonably need to prove the age of someone else? And does a fraudulent document, which she wouldn't have been trained to identify, constitute enough proof? Those are the questions the trial has to answer. (And that the false document she claims she saw actually exists)
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:19 AM
1

She had intent. She intended to have sex with a minor. Mens Rea has been established by that. It doesn't matter if you intended to do something good in this case, it matter that you intended to sleep with a person. Intending to sleep with a minor as an adult is bad faith, evil intent, guilty mind by law. It has nothing to do with the motivation for doing the act, it's that you made an action intentionally. In other words it's not why she intended to do it it that she intended to do it. Let's tak…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:44 AM
2

Get a lawyer, file assaults charges (she assaulted you at least three times two hits and the glass of water are all different assaults) , get a restraining order and ask for custody. At the very least get a police report, and ask for a copy. Doing all of this quickly will help you. Get it on file, the more you can show her running off with your child and resorting to violence the better you look in the eyes of the law especially if you attempt every legal remedy available to you to solve it. You…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:23 PM
7

Yes and no. Shadowbans are supposed to fool bots into thinking they are still being seen by people. Suspensions are supposed to be for people. It just started so most shadowbans will still be in effect as of right now. Obviously there will be some mistakes on which tool to use on the appropriate user.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:31 AM
28

No. Education on civics, ethics and personal finance should be in the curriculum way before gender issues are even thought of. Most schools don't have those legitimate subjects as an entire class (anymore), and they are way more important than gender issues. And giving kids a firm grasp of ethics would change their behavior about gender issues outright anyway. Civics would have to point out equal rights, and suffrage as a matter of course. And personal finance is massively important on it own. T…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:14 PM
1

Haha, how'd I miss that
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:45 PM
27

Is it a picture of a minor? Yes Is the minor naked? Yes Are you that minor? No Congratulations your looking at child pornography. And sometime the third question is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:20 AM
41

The problem is the job has certain requirements. You want someone who can fulfill those requirements. It's like hiring a male waiter at Hooters, they simply don't have the necessary attributes. This isn't the Army, it's the Army Rangers, they are supposed to be above and beyond their counterparts already, if you can't do it than you can't be a Ranger. You don't make math teachers that don't know how to integrate and you don't make soldiers that can't carry the equipment. In addition, men who rep…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 07:30 AM
2

Honestly, I forgot where I heard this, it was attempting to explain why there were not very many female chess masters out there, especially the closer to the top you get. And chess is one of those games that their really isn't any reason for a guy to have any advantage over a girl player. This came up as the one of the reasons for it, that girls did very well at the beginning but as they progress the dumb guys dropped out and the the smart guys gained faster and farther than the girl player. No …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:44 AM
1

Women, speaking generally, are about average intelligence across the board, like a normal bell curve when measured by IQ and various other ways. (About the same, not too smart but not dumb either) Men are not. The are more like a dumbbell curve where few are average intelligence, many are dumb as rocks and many are high above average intelligence. (Either really smart or really dumb) Oxford caters to the high intelligence populations. This would mean many men would be much more successful there …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:23 AM
5

It's a temporary order, meaning he doesn't exactly need a reason why, yet. Just enough to say that if he doesn't do it now and the judge eventually does make a permanent order that it will still have the same affect. Think about a guy that want to build a shed on a piece of property he thinks is his, while another person says no that's my land. They go to court the judge says stop building it until we figure out who's land it really is. In this video he outright accuses CPS of abuse which hasn't…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:26 AM
5

“The socio-legal production of migrant illegality works to systematically dehumanize and exploit these brown bodies for their labor,” Fowler continued. 'Brown bodies' isn't a term I'd call non-discriminatory. The fact remains that an 'illegal alien' is a perfectly acceptable term for aliens, people from another country, that are here illegally. It's not a race issue, you can be from a completely white heritage and still be an illegal alien. If you believe any different you are wrong, there isn't…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:00 AM
6

Lifetime judicial appoints make the law consistent. If we had to argue gay marriage or abortion before the highest court every year, we wouldn't be able to have law and order. It's simple to change the judges decision, make the law different. It difficult to change a judges opinion when he has no threat from you. A bad decision is your opinion, an ever changing court membership is a disaster. The court ought to make ruling and stick to them, and change slowly determinate on the result of that de…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:59 AM
1

Damn, I was just lawyered. But, I can't stand to let anyone stand and take abuse if they can leave. This situation probably doesn't warrant that.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:02 AM
-1

You would have find out what your state says about it. However, I find it very unlikely that you can kick her out of what is right now her property (both of yours technically). I think doing anything to attempt to force her out would affect the divorce suit negatively. My state has a specific provision that basically says you may not kick her out of where she was living before the suit. The one thing you can do is leave the property yourself, I would suggest this option. Everything you are doing…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:50 PM
2

Ann Rice?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 06:52 AM
1

I judge people who ask for help. I judge them to be people that don't like to waste their time, want to know the right way to do things and are smart enough to know when their knowledge is lacking. I judge people who ask for help, they are better than their peers who don't.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:34 PM
4

Hey man, someone just died. That's a father that lost his child. I don't think this should be forgotten in order to make some point about violence. It's a senseless death. This wasn't violence. There was no sign of trauma. We don't know if the kid had a heart attack (can happen) and that's what caused her to break mentally, to the point of pushing her dead baby on a swing unable to cope with the fact her son was not alive anymore, unable to fully accept it. Seeing your own child dead is enough t…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:12 AM
1

Exactly, every study I've ever seen puts men think about half the female population is attractive. (That's a fairly good ratio actually, half are attractive the other half unattractive) While women put about 15-20% of men as attractive. (Give or take a few percentage points depending on the study and methodology) So we have women saying 1 out of 5 men are attractive and men saying 1 out of 2 women are attractive. Yet men are shallow. I've even seen it in real life. The same douchbag guy (I get t…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:03 AM
5

The exoneration came five days before a hearing that could have led to McAlister’s indefinite confinement as a violent sex offender under the state’s civil commitment law The sentence was life without parole apparently. I'm not saying you shouldn't go to jail if you rape, or attempt to rape, someone but I'm not willing to put someone in jail for the rest of their life for it. Murders get out of jail eventually and that's a way worse crime. 29 years for attempted rape is way too long. Of course h…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:47 AM
2

But he didn't say it. He was just laughing about it on the side, then the reporter confronts him about him laughing. he say "are you actually filming this?" Which as far I can tell she never answered that question. She then continues to berate him with questions about it to the point that security has to come because of the commotion that she started, in no way did he begin the chain of events. As far as I can tell he didn't know at the start he was being recorded and probably had no idea it was…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:00 AM
4

It amazing, after watching the video you can hear the guy say "Are you actually filming this?" a few time. The guy was just having a laugh at what someone else did. She starts to confront him about laughing in a demanding tone. She was asking him his opinions and then just keeps at hit over and over. She was by far the most unprofessional there. Why did this even air? He even looked like he was uncomfortable being filmed, and she berates him about a subject that he had nothing to do with, other …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:45 AM
1

"Re-affirm" was a bad choice of words. Having a prenup not mentioning kids at all will be a problem in a divorce that has children.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:28 PM
0

Several reason most likely kids.Having kids is going to drastically change how you use, spend, save and think about money, period. Varying health conditions. Come to think about what is wrong with sitting down and having a serious discussion about the assets of a marriage. I'm not talking hey sign this, but a full on disclosure and discussion about what happens if you are separated or die. Especially when large changes happen in the ones of your lives. One of the biggest obstacle for pre-nup is …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 01:17 AM
4

Or get a post nup, and re affirm the pre-nup.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:55 PM
3

I find that odd that the state of Texas (that has no income tax) would intercept federal returns. My advise is too get as much information as possible, then weigh your opinion with a lawyer.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:44 PM
2

The IRS can't send your money to someone else without a court order or your permission. They have to have some documentation explaining why your money is not being sent to you. If they say it's for child support then an order must be made by an authority that can do that. Child support payment are not normally done through tax refunds payment (since there is no way of knowing if you are even receiving a refund when it's ordered), so there had to be something that initiated it. Once you have that…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:01 PM
15

Call the IRS, ask them to send the copy of either a) your hand written approval or b) the court order that allowed them to withhold funds. When they say they can't. Explain calmly that this isn't legal. Those are the only two ways that they are allowed to stop payment to you. And if this continues you expect all of it back with the interest that comes with late payments from the IRS. Then call your lawyer (assuming you had one for the divorce/SAPCR) if the call to the IRS doesn't work.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:52 PM
0

Don't do this. The name itself was designed to confront people. It's obvious to the casual observer that it's meant to be against feminism. I'm not against anyone, I'm for everyone. I'm for people realizing there are problems that are uniquely male. I'm for people realizing there are problems that are uniquely female. I'm for the solution, which is accomplished together. This doesn't address the issue, this causes the divide. I'm sick of the divide, it's not me against you. Him against her, her …
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:15 AM
0

I don't get it. How are you going to charge them with a crime in open court without identifying who they are? That's the point, that court is an open process and ought to remain that way. A criminal doesn't get protection from the court it get punished by it. We can't have a rule of open and public court for a few, that's not equal treatment under law. The most crazy part is not releasing the hotel names. These hotels could have kids and families in them. If consistently used for prostitution th…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:46 AM
1

You don't understand the policy violation was the drinking not the sex.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:23 AM
3

Selling crabs isn't a crime, exposing someone to it is.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:42 AM
10

You lost your life man. It's day in day out, no real change, no real enjoyment. Everything seems to just be stacking against you. Your tired and feel pressured at work then again at home, there seems to be no recourse. I'm not going to say you should stay with your wife. But, I am going to say your kids need you more than you know, they will change your job to guide that change. Man, you sound like you need a vacation away from it all, a weekend out just for yourself, go to a ball game or someth…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:45 PM
2

Honestly, there is another side to this argument. It comes down to if you have reason to believe that a child is being abused, you can do something, in some jurisdictions you are obligated to do something about it even if you have no relationship with the child or their providers. You can do something about it, and you will have no fear of retribution from the state. That is why the accuser doesn't get prosecuted, he followed the law. Now, it should take much less than a year to determine if any…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:09 PM
2

hospitals have to rely on the fact that most people have insurance that will pay their high prices Insurance companies don't pay those rates that would be insane. that they can subsidize those with bad insurance or no insurance. Sounds right but it's not the case. Most of the time the uninsured are just screwed over with extremely high rates, that no one else actually pays, including insurance, and Medicare.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:49 PM
1

Punishment doesn't fit the crime, what can I say. If it's the law, that okay, but we shouldn't be jailing parents for this, especially if it the first time, I can't agree with that. I can agree with a fine, unless it's a repeated offense then your just blatantly ignoring the law.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 08:39 PM
1

Than you missed my whole point, that I can understand the state's position and can understand the mother's position. When I was 8 I was very able to stay for hours by myself, so I'd obviously think the law is in err. But that doesn't mean every 8 year old is, or that the state can't make the decision that 8 is too young.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 08:19 PM
1

By realizing both sides have valid opinions. And that there is conflict in the right balance. You mean you're incapable of being conflicted on some issue internally?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:46 PM
1

Paying $50, and going to jail both means going hungry, wouldn't it? I don't live in the same state, different states that have different laws, this is definitely a states right. I think the law should apply, but the question is when does it not apply? Is it 8? 5? 13? We are going to disagree, the state comes in and say the line is at 8 (or wherever) then that's where it is. No matter where we put it someone is going to say it's too high or too low.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:33 PM
1

No, I just can understand that there is an age that I ought not to have walked that far home alone. I just can't categorically say when that is, if I was 4, then yes they should have been. At 8, probably not. The point is when am I old enough? And when am I old enough to take the 4 year old with me without my parents? And I honestly do not know, but states make that determination. To jail someone over their first offense, is a little drastic, a $50 fine, okay won't be doing that again.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:42 PM
0

This is technically child neglect plain and simple. Everyone here is saying, along with the article, what if someone.....and all I can think is what if she got hurt? I mean the playground swings, high places, just tripped and fell, loose nail etc. What would happen then? (I knew a kid that got seriously hurt jumping off swings when he was like 10) No evil stranger just the kid got hurt playing, it happens. At some point we can say well people are old enough to deal with that on their own, but is…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:15 PM
1

I agree but the line ought to be drawn somewhere, we won't agree on where. I'm glad Texas at least decided that there is a line.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:22 PM
-1

It's a shame that people think that child support means to take as much money as possible. You can easily raise a child on $7k (change to about $8.3k for inflation now) a month ($80k/yr), (and I even think that's high) any more is exploiting the non-custodial parent, no way do I believe that all of that money is going to "the care of the child", which is what the money is for not to take care of the parent also. Judges follow the law, what they feel is adequate (in terms of dollar value) is usua…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:08 PM
10

Texas Family Code Sec. 154.125. APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES TO NET RESOURCES. (a) The guidelines for the support of a child in this section are specifically designed to apply to situations in which the obligor's monthly net resources are not greater than $7,500 or the adjusted amount determined under Subsection (a-1), whichever is greater. (a-1) The dollar amount prescribed by Subsection (a) is adjusted every six years as necessary to reflect inflation. Texas made a maximum amount.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:59 PM
-1

I don't need their approval.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:26 AM
20

Reminds me of an article I saw, where a classroom was asked, girls raise your hand I you've ever been hit by a man, some hands go up. Okay, now guys raise your hand if you've ever been hit by a girl and practical ever guys hand is raised.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:16 AM
2

Shut up, save all past communication and lawyer up. Do not contact her. Edit: and for god's sake don't Facebook or tweet anything.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 05:50 AM
2

If i wanted an entire equation Man + Women = ∞ I was thinking that with "∴" (if this is true therefore that is true ∴ If that is true therefore this is true) One can not exist with out the other, therefore: by proving man, I proved women; by proving women, I proved man.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:43 AM
2

In mathematical proof, the therefore sign (∴) is sometimes placed before a logical consequence, such as the conclusion of a syllogism. -Wikipedia I would prefer this this, as in Men therefore Women, or Women therefore Men. That one can't be without each other.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:17 AM
17

By this definition, I have been raped (I'm male) right? I mean I didn't always give an enthusiastic yes, and honestly sometimes I would have rather been doing something else....most guys I know could say that..., it's like it's inconceivable to these people, that men are people too, that it's impossible that there are women who want to have sex with me that I don't want to have sex with (or that I also want to have sex with but not at all times and on command) and that a certain amount of convin…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:56 AM
5

Pittsylvania County Circuit Court Judge William Alexander II told Laughinghouse that he didn't believe incarcerating her would help the victim. He also said he has no doubt that she realizes the incidents shouldn't have happened. That is not your job. The law provides you with what will "help" the victim, you are bound to fallow that, not your personal opinion. Does not punishing them help the victim, does it help the convicted? Who cares, the law was broke, the law says this is the punishment, …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:01 PM
1

there is a clear disparity between the ratio of severity to sentence length. That's what's not explained well. I have no idea what the severity level actually means, is a 2 twice as bad as a 1 really? (In other words does a severity level 4 require twice as much punishment as a 2? If it doesn't having a high disparity isn't all that surprising, assuming that high severity level require more punishment than the ratio of severity levels) Since I didn't really understand the severity level the disp…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:12 PM
2

No a lot of Pro-choice people realize this decision is hard, and will inevitable affect everyone involved. The problem is making it illegal and thus having society make that decision for you. This is never easy no matter what side your on....
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:38 AM
5

Judge Millard tells Fox 26 after she found Hall in contempt he walked out of the courtroom which she says is a big no no. Yep, in a courtroom you do what the judge says or you go to jail, this was a little harsh though.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 09:16 PM
4

Unemployed men with employed wives, will too.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 12:57 AM
5

The same reason women should pay insurance that covers testicular cancer, and prostate exams. And men should pay insurance that cover gynecologists. In fact the vast majority of thing health insurance covers you will not use, it's be impossible for you to get that sick and not die. I would rather have insurance that covers what I need and what everyone else needs when they need it, while being affordable to everyone. Bigger pools means bigger nominal profits for insurance companies. I'd also rat…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:28 PM
3

. "It's hard for men to say, 'I'm confused, I'm not talented, I haven't found my dream', or 'I'm ugly' or 'I'm smoking marijuana and I'm having really negative thoughts Man, that hit real close to home.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:42 PM
11

Exactly, when the mother refuses to let the father see his kids, then he is getting punished severely. If they listen to the court order they wouldn't have the punishment and neither would the father.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:04 PM
10

"Women should be able to dress however they wish How you present yourself matters. It's not selfish, it's fact that how you dress and appear affects how people treat you. Women at work should dress professionally (or in uniform) just as men should. The idea that women can wear anything they want and be treated the same no matter what they are wearing, is just plain delusional. Same goes for guys, if I dress like a slacker I'm going to be treated as one, if I dress in nothing but a bow tie and bl…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:44 AM
2

Totally agree. Sometime this is even more complicated, not just "that people who are ignored and treated like shit are the ones most likely to kill themselves", people can actually blame themselves for this. They want to be the one at fault, in a weird way it's comforting, because if its not their fault there is nothing they can do to change it. When in reality some people are simply with in the wrong place with the wrong people, and few changes in routines and an honest attempt to find better f…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:24 PM
2

It really is heavy on the stereotypes, but I'm not going to ignore that guys and girls are different, and that's not a bad thing, quite the contrary. I think, I'd rather have girls with an infant, for example. But, on a case by case basis honestly it depend on the person, I prefer male waiters also, but I've had absolutely amazing female waitresses, and horrible male ones.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:23 AM
12

I feel the opposite way. I'd rather have a guy baby sit. (I'm not a parent though) guys usually are down to actually play and interact with kids they are watching. Girls tend to just sit and watch (tv) and talk on the phone. I'd feel much safer knowing that the baby sitter would be actively involved with the children than just there. Kids can be tricky sometimes. I've also heard this from other people including a female teacher of mine, who actually taught a babysitting certification class. Obvi…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 11:36 PM
10

Sec. 160.204. PRESUMPTION OF PATERNITY. (a) A man is presumed to be the father of a child if: (1) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born during the marriage; (2) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born before the 301st day after the date the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity, or divorce; (3) he married the mother of the child before the birth of the child in apparent compliance with law, even if the attempted marr…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:07 PM
0

Strangely, the ratio doesn't change when you make that distinction.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:42 AM
1

I'd look into the idea of a trust, it's a legal entity like a corporation, and then still would own the assets after the divorce, it may even just continue to own it far after that it you want. The biggest problem I see is that the corporation could easily be seen as tax avoidance (or if done poorly, it would be conceivable that you'd pay more in taxes during, taxed on your income then corporate profits and sales tax to you), with or without that being the intent.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:46 PM
6

Girls never hit boys. I'm a boy, I've never hit a girl. Several girls have hit me.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:07 PM
24

The problem is that they are no longer asking for equal pay for equal work, they are asking for equal pay for different/unequal work. We can argue that nurses should make more anyway or whatever, they are different jobs that require different skills and abilities and should be paid differently. It used to be a women can do any job a man can, then it women can't do certain male dominated jobs (like manual labor), then its no matter what job I have a man should never make more than me. My question…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:02 PM
9

This is the first post that actually understood the state he's in matters and then found the law of that state. Engagement rings are either a conditional gift (you'd get it back) or an outright gift (she keeps it) depending on the state your in.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:48 PM
3

But what's the good reason for letting them just drag someone's name through the mud? It's slander plain and simple.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:38 PM
1

Could be a mirror site I guess. Honestly I don't mind reports that much, it's going to be hard to not have a few repeats for TIL for example. It just when you see the same post on the front page from two different OPs. Or it just really didn't you see that here already, its even in comments, ive seen the same video in some comment threads like five times before. (The goomba family video in some Mario thread) Reposting the same thing every few months can help people who didn't see it the first ti…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:42 PM
2

Exactly it's not like they don't know, Reddit tells you if a posted link was used, before you post it. At least in certain subreddits and i believe it even tells you how long ago.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:01 PM
2

Say we are going to make a promise to spend the rest of our lives together, when this happens the pre-nup is useless. However the rest of our lives is a long time and both of us will change, and if EITHER of us can't keep this promise, the pre-nup will allow us to be able to ensure that we know that NEITHER of us will be screwed over, and can make what would already be a bad situation go more smoothly and possibly make it so we don't actually completely hate each other after its over. Remind her…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:11 PM
1

How many kids? That's important.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:07 AM
1

Hmm I'm detecting some logical fallacies here, no true Scotsmen, appeal to emotion, ad homonim, loaded question it actually goes on, really is quite impressive how many she could fit in there.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:41 PM
-3

But once the "duress" is over, she was still aware of the contract, and had ample time to contact a lawyer before the divorce. Contracts under duress not valid, contract where duress stops and that party does nothing constitutes a valid contract, because without the duress why wouldn't you stop it? Yeah, maybe the timing of the paperwork was bad but she knew about the contract, knew the terms and decided to not do anything, maybe throwing away prenups happens in New York, but not everywhere. How…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:31 PM
-3

Ummm, you don't need legal counsel to enter into a prenup, it's a contract. Having then sign one before the wedding is common, if she wanted counsel, he would have to have the time to review it before signing it, yes. It's may not contain clauses that you can't sign away, unconscionable as you say. And a realist knowledge of the assets is needed to. If she had a problem with the prenup, she could has seen a lawyer at any time even after the marriage (they can be altered by both parties at anytim…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:36 PM
1

An unmarried women isn't fulfilling the same social contract by have kids to begin with. I want to point out that I disagree with both of those statements, they encourage gender stereotyping. The social contract changes from generation to generation, and environment to environment, (for example in America it was expected that when married only the man would be working, now in America it's not, and this expecting is almost abnormal (sometimes even fought against), while the standard is now indivi…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:35 PM
2

For that matter neither is the women. Just saying...
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:25 PM
5

This has nothing to do with him being a man. It's about how we treat those who...look horrible...I said it..... That makes this possible. Straw man argument here. This is why we need to support our troops long after the battle, because this happens to the best of us, I don't want to seem cold but this doesn't belong here....
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:59 PM
-11

But it make my penis look bigger and most girls I've meet thinks its better that way. Honestly I never really thought of it until I saw a porno without one, and it looked disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:10 AM
2

Shit my hand went up. Never really thought about it but several women have hit me usually for nothing or they didn't get the sarcasm but for real I took it and really never thought about it, I mean its not like I feared for my safety before or after. Shit one time I told immediately " damn it took you three years to do that" obviously we never got along lol
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:40 PM
2

And there are exception on both sides but as a general statement I stand by it
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:44 PM
5

Yeah I've noticed in my own life that women cheat on guys more too. The only difference is how a girl will cheat with one other guy and the guy will just sleep around with several. The thing is that I know tons of girls that have cheated on every bf they had and I just can't say the same for the guys I know, well there are some man whore out there but they are usually to stupid to know what they are doing.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter