TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Adventurous_Equal489 Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by Adventurous_Equal489 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

60s feminism did bring some good for women but you have to remember second wave feminism is when the misandry really started taking off. third and fourth wave would've been better if the second was different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/25 09:01 PM
-4

Addressing that men fuck each other over especially the young and poor for their own self interest within men's own terms not feminists manipulating this truth to their divisionary benefit would be solid step one actually in creating male unity. at the very least we should have a conversation of how men create the male disposability problem and how to start addressing that which could turn said dialogue to the politicians and wealthy abusing us without feminists putting it under misandry lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 01:17 AM
9

the thing is though generally they have those disagreements but will get over it for a cause only with few exceptions. for example you will never see a homophobic man willingly side with a gay man. especially if the reason is rooted in religion as the gay man is the antithesis to what the religious man believes and he will not budge. As you can see in many pro men groups where notably gay men are considered enemies as the liberal woman. Check out just what many red pill type of me think of gay m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 01:12 AM
1

i never said they should vote R for one thing not voting is an option as well, secondly i never said i wanted them to do either but i do acknowledge that men have their own self interests and democrats demonized them for the past decade. so i would prefer democrats over republicans hell yes but while i may dislike them at this point i can't blame a disillusioned man for witholding his vote if he does not believe the democrat party has not done enough to earn it. because frankly odds are if we go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 03:30 PM
-1

my comment would already tell you no if you read it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 03:01 PM
14

same, i do not dislike the democrat party anymore than republicans in this sense for just pandering as thats what political parties do, but i would encourage men on the fence to hold out until they feel democrats truly earned their vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 08:43 AM
49

informed by cruelty more like it. its an active choice to be that nasty
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:03 AM
75

All I want is consistency really. I am fine with anything as long as both sexes are held under the same rules, and are allowed to lobby their concerns under equal consideration and fairness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 03:43 AM
52

i just found out about this order because my mom found out and complained t weird, probably for gay men to meet, and "what about women and girls." Ugh... I didn't even answer I defaulted to a "Huh weird" I am so disgusted with the right now
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 12:34 PM
1

True asf it be amazing if Obama said something like this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 02:18 AM
1

In this case I think is is fair to say he could have had time to change his mind though I would like him to come out and say the left made a mistake in its handling of sex issues in the late 2000s and 2010s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 02:00 AM
3

I would want to know WHEN he said that in all fairness, he very recently started talking about misandry so much like how he changed his mind in favor of gay marriage me may very well have changed his mind on misandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/25 11:30 PM
8

damn. I had no idea it was this bad. I knew it likely involved terfs because it only let in women who passed the facial identification like that failed giggle app but this is God awful
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 04:54 PM
6

same reason they were united with lesbians despite women being equally likely to be homophobic, they just put dislike of certain women aside for the bigger picture that a lot of men just won't do with their beliefs even if convincing gay men to join MRA would be a game changer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 04:52 PM
22

If it would allow men to avoid being paired with women I would say this is a good feature to let customers and workers select their preferences. But we know thats unlikely to be the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 06:17 PM
3

Its a movie about the Titanic, when men were unfortunately treated as disposable. Not to mention the movie was decades ago so imo this is pointless, getting worked up about this movie having slight misandrist/male disposability undertones is silly as getting mad at a 1950s sitcom for being a little misogynistic with the women, in the sense thats just looking for an excuse to be offended. IMO there is much more antagonistic media towards men to be concerned about than one thats bad if you squint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/25 07:24 AM
1

Did you bother to read my comment buddy? I said that gender essentialism causes more harm than good but all I am saying is we need a practical solution for progress that people I guess we can say normies can get behind if we want change at all opposed jumping to square Z with an idea that most would find nonsensical and radical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 01:01 AM
4

I think this is pointless as I do believe in some ways there should be elimination of gender essentialism particularly predestination that damns us all with parents and a society that won't raise children the best PERSON they can be because boys will be boys girls will be girls. Gender essentialism is how tradition or not we coddled most girls become entitled parasite with no ambition just because they're girls so meh it's not worth challenging to overcome passivity and become productive citizen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:07 AM
5

I hope your friend is doing okay
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/25 09:26 PM
1

you're thinking of fourth wave feminism, not third wave which was a step in the right direction from the second that introduced much hateful concepts, as being fairly less misandrist,
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 04:59 AM
6

I will never understand redditors and their insistence in assuming someone's tone just for what? All I did was tell a guy to stop telling obvious false statistics and how that damages important discussion that can't afford derailment. Really, what is vitriolic about that? Considering for instance how batshit Twitter or 4chan circles get over bad Star Wars movies how am I being unreasonable here when I didn't even insult the guy himself?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 10:18 PM
11

You're joking right? I'm sorry but prison rapes effects lives, so in serious conversation we don't need dip shits making up extreme statistics everyone and I mean everyone knows couldn't be true not the most vehement pro male activist would agree with this. My comments is not supposed to change anyone's mind, even this guy knows he's full of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 10:02 PM
20

I could believe a significant to majority of rapes happening in prison since logically guards aren't inclined to enforce humanity and rapists in surely aren't short for opportunities but come on man 99% is an inflated ass number that you know is bullshit. Don't water down real discourse with this crap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 04:35 PM
4

Men shouldn't settle for "former" misandrist who are just suddenly coming around while connecting their interests in men's assistance and protection. it is highly likely this bitch is phoney and shortly will overcompensate by turning her unaddressed capacity to resent half the population on other women instead of building up men. Because she does not want to grow up from her old habits or make right. Someone like her just want checked out men to like her
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 06:20 AM
2

Pretty much. I doubt this woman is sincere in that she wants to improve all lives, she'll likely just change the goal to shitting on women to make herself stand out to men. Faker.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 06:13 AM
1

If the kid is asking things like that please pull him away from Tiktok even if you have to figuratively speaking drag his parent by the ear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 02:40 AM
5

Honestly that's just politics, caring less about the people and how to interest them in voting for you. That's always been the game so no big surprise they are suddenly coning around. You should still make them earn your vote if you feel it's insincere. They got four years to do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 10:36 PM
2

I felt this effect in advocating non-topic related spaces that I came closest to discouraging misandry because in short misandry will always come back on us. it was disheartening to have to use that approach just to plant an idea instead of why men are complicated and messy as we are and they're still people as we are let's not demonize as we know what that's like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 10:25 PM
2

No it's not. It means that someone (usually a man but there is the femcel version) can not get laid or have a relationship despite their best efforts. That is why it's called incel, involuntary celibate. How could it be an equivalent of slut for men when a slut is a promiscuous person (usually a woman but there's the term manwhore/manslut) who slept around with a number of people? These two terms are just not compatible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 01:08 PM
2

That's kinda hard to say given the demographic that first reshaped the term as we know now (involuntarily celibates who may or may not hate the opposite sex for it.) Define and label themselves as such judging by the existence of their forums and the word still being common in their other social media circles. So I can get behind no longer muddying the term as feminists have (to just mean whatever they want about a man) But if we went all out deciding it a slur how would we regard the collective…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 01:02 PM
16

It is total bullshit Tate is still out of jail but the point is more so he does not have the influence leftists think he does per-say in the alt right (who hate him too for mostly sexually puritanical reasons and they are not crazy about trafficking either.) Politically speaking his place is with boys with no real convictions and want to clap at a guy beating his chest at the women he get.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 07:38 PM
33

The left really do over-estimate Tates influence. Right wing commentators (Down to Ron fucking Desantis) tend to dislike Tate themselves for his PUA stuff, promoting promiscuity in men, sex trafficking, and they see his courses as the obvious scams they are. Tate has no place anywhere on the political spectrum he just stuck his ass where he wanted while politically uncommitted boys cheer him on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 07:35 PM
3

Then you do not have to. You have no more obligation than anyone else has to trust or believe you. This goes for anyone you do not have to believe anything but what you want. That said if it is in your interest for people to gain sympathy or understanding for mens issues you will never get that by clawing at everyone who stops a second to hear you like an angry street cat.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:18 PM
2

Who's behind that post? Does it: Divide the community? Create problems where there wasn't one? Pretend its a concerned citizen? It could be Joe FED!
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:03 PM
1

SHEESH.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:10 PM
15

I vaguely heard that Netflix made something about Cleopatra but tbh I did not pay attention as I have ignored Netflix media for a long time.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:17 PM
104

Netflix is even out here race swapping real people? Damn.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:53 PM
1

I might need to see a source for that claim. (Specifically the stay at home mother part is what I mean.)
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:10 AM
0

Hm, in my comment I was more so referring to how men deny their own solidarity by segregating themselves on racial, sexual, religious, economic differences but you do raise a angle I have not considered with your perspective that feminists hold a door open for most of their extremists that MRA are more likely to close. I see where you are coming from.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 04:03 PM
1

Pretty much so, conservativism and men have an issue with reading the room on how to make progress. Women are more likely to unite and tolerate each others crap for a period in interest of a cause before they split again, while pro-men are overall harsher conformists on each other and refuse to act in anything but their own sub demographics perhaps best called tribes. That is the big problem with MRAs they will do anything except unite as they should to push fairer treatments in courts when like…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 01:28 PM
22

I tended to say this in trans spaces that much of trans hate is kept alive by misandry, and can only die out when misandry does but they are too high on the koolaid fumes to listen. Guess I have to keep be proven right.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 12:36 PM
14

Part of the problem may be pro-men groups may lean towards conservativism and otherwise non-gay friendly beliefs with varying degrees of violent ideals so it may be harder for gay men to safely find male solidarity among all men opposed to strictly other gay men than it is for lesbians where pro-women groups are considerably more apathetic to supportive of them.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 12:33 PM
2

Nice Osaka PFPP
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:34 PM
5

Mandatory paternity testing would help men make an informed decision from the get go if they want involvement in the kid and mothers lives, and prevent men from being deceived into fatherhood or child support by a cheating or otherwise baby trapping woman.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:23 PM
4

A mandatory test would confirm whether or not that life was because of YOU and not another man you would have to pay for. So following your logic mandatory paternity tests would be best to ensure fairness for fathers to not pay for children who are not his own.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:21 PM
1

A vast majority of these post contain sexual implications, attractive women, quite a few with their boobs out, in suggestive poses that titillate men (Wow, feminists and Christian women would totally get behind this) and almost all are posted by a guy called Greg If you can not infer this is at least 99% chance a horny larp my question bears repeating. <image>
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 05:15 PM
1

Yes there is it called being on the internet longer than a day. And I am so sure there is nothing sketch about the one insisting on ORGASM control huh? If you are so confident this subreddit is completely serious nut up and link it.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 04:57 PM
0

I did and I am still not convinced this supposed subreddit is not a fetish larp reddit. Just WHY would a Christian gynocentric or not subreddit repost what is OBVIOUS fetish material? Especially when Christian women tend to be pruder than the men. It does not add up.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 04:51 PM
0

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 04:46 PM
0

OP four of these are not even misandry its just porn that is more likely to be a guy poster anyway. (The one by Valerie Solanas yeah that one is obviously by a misandrist)
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 04:18 PM
2

I do not know personally. It's not particularly mean spirited so I might say it's possible the author had no ill intent and was just making a comedic observation, I could also see if it was made in poor faith though.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 02:58 PM
2

it's a shame misandrist found that comic. I always find the idea of human men taking flamboyant actions that some animals do as a funny what if thought.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 02:32 PM
0

What a shortsighted comment. You think that overturning Kennedy v Louisiana will not come to bite men on the ass with courts favoring women by default on accusations? Pushing for sex crimes to receive higher sentences would be fine as it gives falsely accused at least a chance to come out one day, but what you are suggesting will absolutely be abused to send innocent men to death.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 01:26 PM
3

Instagram is a vanity app, probably the worst subject where users are conditioned and predisposed to spying on others lives and seething that they are not that person receiving or doing nice things, so good faith does not exist to them. You should uninstall it really you will be happier.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 01:22 PM
16

An assault or murder with evidence or reasoning the motive for killing or harming an individual was out of hatred for a collective group, which indeed many cases come out that way. For instance Emmett Till was victim to a hate crime as he was lynched due to an accusation he as a black boy whistled at a white woman Carolyn Bryant (May she burn in hell). When certainly a white boy of Tills age would not have received the same treatment by his killers. Which qualifies that case a senseless hate cri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 08:32 AM
1

I never said anything about the probability of this actually happening.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:24 PM
1

Debatable, even if you do not buy into P2025, republicans are public they want to arrange an exception for Trump to be able to run a third time. So he might be planning ahead if that works out.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:23 PM
70

Nah we could call them that when it was proposed there only women can be SAd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 06:20 PM
19

Because certain red pillers became a poison to good faith male advocacy in a similar way feminism poisoned discussions of good faith female advocacy in some eyes. Some people just ruin a good thing for everyone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/25 10:29 AM
-1

So what do you propose the solution?
/r/MensRights02/03/25 07:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter