TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AerMarcus Archive

View 1 posts and 148 comments by AerMarcus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

AerMarcus/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:24 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Hate speech which incites violence? Ohh definitely.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:01 AM
1

Which is why I said arguing that the posting that article here is implying something would be a different issue. My disagreement is with saying the post's title is a lie when it was copied from the article.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:27 AM
-1

Dear God give it up already, I've already addressed this if you cared to read it, I'm done here.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 12:20 AM
0

I very promptly realised I did not want to lower myself such as you have. Being excessive, attempting to be overly pedantic, and telling me to fuck off. Your problem is less than semantics, and this conversation is nonsensical to continue.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 12:09 AM
-1

Settle down.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:58 PM
1

Get outta here. The title is taken verbatim minus the brackets which include most of the first sentence. A completely fair title for the purpose of sharing this article. If you want to argue that by posting it specifically here they are implying something, go ahead-but don't criticize the words used to share an article when they are taken word-for-word. Edit: The words inside the brackets are also verbatim, just taken from the first sentence rather than the title.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:24 PM
0

The title is a straight out copy from the article.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:00 PM
2

I assumed your use of budding parishes was in jest, was I wrong on that count?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:06 AM
5

I would strongly complain. A mandatory test with sexist answers? That really gets my goat...
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:12 AM
2

Tis
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:42 AM
64

Also lowering minimum requirements...
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:42 PM
38

Tbh I've honestly never seen any :P
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:37 AM
3

/u/flappinghands fyi
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:32 PM
2

Pretty sure he's joking, whereas in the other case it doesn't usually seem like they're joking
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:32 AM
1

Mine. Couple years back, and before that, and ongoing. Just girls.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:11 AM
1

Lol I guess so. I just think it's poor to make any jokes about such travesties, no matter how long past, but I'm not going to get all butthurt over this. :P
/r/MensRights29/01/17 01:06 PM
12

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/116 (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18 years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) A surgical operation is not a violation of this section if the operation is— (1) necessary to the health of the person on whom it is performed, a…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:57 AM
2

But is this any worse than that guy (just reported on the local news in the Richmond VA area) who posted/facebooked/tweeted that "Don't wanna be a single mother? then keep your g'd legs closed!" ((that may not be a direct quote)) saying what he's said? I'd equate it closer to telling women to have their tubes tied or the like. They could have just said "Against' abortion? Don't have sex" but they didn't... I'm not going to go around telling women what to do, but if male doctors, or scientists wa…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:06 AM
4

I agree. Another tagline touted was essentially 'get a vagina, then you can judge.' Ignoring male medical, and scientific professionals directly related in the matter. Besides government doesn't work like that where only one gender can vote on certain things, nor should it.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:22 AM
1

Not sure if this fits well, or is worth a conversation here, but I figured I'd just see what you guys thought first. Edit: Will delete if popular opinion dictates this doesn't fit in the discussions here I'm not against abortion, but believe it shouldn't happen once the fetus is a certain age. I said so on a page, and basically just got useless image memes in return, even a link to a court case which was thought to show myself wrong, despite it actually supporting my thoughts. A fetus shouldn't …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:27 AM
1

Damn dead trees. Haha, what did you do with the wood mate?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:29 AM
1

I mean I'm not trying to jerk lol
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:57 AM
2

Aye except in this case, no circle jerk here bud
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:10 AM
1

???
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:07 AM
2

Have you wielded an axe much? They're not as sharp as one might think. It's an easy way to break bone through the design of the axe blade. Source is myself and some dead trees
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:05 AM
3

'Skull splitting' with an axe leads to death almost every single time?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:35 PM
1

Also missing the aboriginal demographic
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:28 PM
5

Neither of them are news. They're gossip. :P
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:32 AM
0

Was that person ranting because of what you said, or because of your username btw..?
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:32 AM
3

I honestly have no clue who you think you're talking to A damn egotistical jackass who either wants to troll for shits and giggles, or truly is an imbecile. I swear to god you can fuck off unless you provide some damn source. What I'm saying is I'm fairly nice, and I've never wished someone died, and completely against the death penalty.. but I'm also sick of fucktwats like you thinking you're so important your word is law, and don't have to provide sources to argue points. What is presented wit…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:49 AM
3

God you're actually a fucking idiot. You snidely ask if the mate above can read, referring to your one in ten statistic, which very damn clearly would imply you're speaking of his source since you didn't link a single one to counter his. (Which de facto assumes the only source as referred) Instead trusting us to take your word as fact, over an actual proven statistic from a study. I'm almost never harsh, and I very rarely threaten, or insult people, but I swear to god you can fuck off unless you…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:15 AM
6

I Ctrl-F searched for your 1 in 10 stat. There were ten results, and each one of them were saying that 1 in ten men/women were victims. Nothing said 1 in ten victims were men. Please, if what you're talking about is in there, enlighten me of what to search for instead of '1 in 10.'
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:53 AM
2

https://giphy.com/gifs/jay-height-JPnGpvkICQlc4
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:03 AM
2

Usually, there definitely have been exceptions of course. But I feel like our average is fairly civil, and I enjoy that.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:20 AM
3

Yeah, without it we can't agree or disagree, we need both sides. Love this, whenever I mention needing to see both sides people flock salt to it. I should stay away from facebook arguments, but the posts keep coming.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:44 AM
3

It definitely seems as though we are expected to do nothing.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 05:51 PM
2

Aye, but a lot of things don't get this awareness. Men's issues are one of them.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:21 PM
3

That's bs. It's awareness that gets people like you involved in the first place. What made you decide to go to Thailand? You heard they needed help.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 06:57 AM
1

If they had a more important local thing, why didn't they put a doodle for that? :P When in doubt I just assume it's the USA, I'm not even from there.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:42 PM
7

when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/ :P
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:41 PM
3

Only one friend I have is anywhere near being a men's rights activist. She's a woman.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:35 PM
3

To quote /u/probably_a_squid Awareness is always the first step, and every little bit helps.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:33 PM
33

Equal representation of problems is nice
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:31 PM
5

How have you never read, or heard these such stories? Experiences where people get into trouble for walking their own damn son to school. Get the cops called on them for being alone with their own damn child. If you've never heard of this, you have noone to blame but yourself. And no, I'm not going to give you a link, go get off your ass and look it up.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:19 PM
6

Why does the person who asks the question never seem to respond to their replies, when proven wrong or debated?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:16 PM
1

Sometimes you can read something serious as sarcastic, perhaps that may be a reason. Not sure,
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:15 PM
34

Women punching you in the street? Man up Attempt self defence? Abuser, assault There are numerous videos on this exact thing. People don't seem to care about women abusing men in public, whereas they come out of the woodworks to help women in the reverse scenario. (This is not an opinion. This is something documented on in numerous videos, as I've said above.)
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:12 PM
1

but this "norm" is only inside ones head. Not only do men have different symptoms for depression which are ignored, even when presenting with the same symptoms there is failure to correctly diagnose. I see a social norm there
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:10 PM
1

Point missed
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:02 PM
1

I still don't see how tf his leg is on another seat, it's a bench anyways. If anything I would push more into that seat(if I had the confidence at the time) that the lady was pushing into to keep my own space from being further molested. No this image is not a men's rights issue but since people want to argue about manspreading then yes we're going to have a silly little issue.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 09:48 PM
0

Someone should have blurred her face to be honest.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:51 AM
1

How tf do you see three seats. At most he's using one and a quarter if that.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:50 AM
1

Cause by being men we have to be strong eh bud My point being it's not equal, that's why it's here. Because they leave out the male element. How tf do you interpret reality bud
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:15 PM
-1

But why doesn't it reference men at all? It is not clear. It kinda says anyone can use it, but then goes on to confirm, if you identify as a woman, or trans person, then you can, but makes no effort to confirm it as to being open to those identifying as a man. Why not? That's just dumb, if we're going to go all out, we should clarify for both sexes.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:24 PM
1

;)
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:52 PM
1

Oh er, I actually didn't know that heh. Alright then :)
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:31 AM
6

Goddamnit, can we all just agree to cease allowing kill yourself type comments to continue.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:21 AM
0

I like this idea, makes enough sense for me. Still a bit silly considering :P
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:13 AM
2

But how would that make sense anyway. It is still just calling them the wrong gender still. If they're ftm then it's rude because you're calling them female still. If they're mtf then it's rude because you're still calling them male, and also a father? <Don't get it :P
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:11 AM
2

Is it different for gay guys? I've never experienced this apparent level of douchyness displayed online. Received messages but most were pretty good conversation-like quite good, and only one or two 'pictures' Either way, glad to be done with that, and got out alive in a pair. : P
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:20 AM
-1

Do you have a source for that? Just curious.. I'll probably look it up, if you don't remember :p
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:55 PM
1

Heck, it was pretty legit 50 years ago no? 100 years ago was 1916, :P
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:18 PM
1

I'm not saying that. But the girl was acting as if Mexicans had it worse or something.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:49 PM
1

Well America f*d them up enough previously though? Right?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 03:29 PM
1

I don't disagree, it's just what catches people's attention.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:32 PM
2

Yea, but he's talking for the sort of "shock value" and "click baity" things that journalists like.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:26 AM
5

actually researches their points or they know the truth, and are just pandering?. :P
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:53 PM
7

r/nocontext ?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:37 PM
4

Oh f off. Obvious troll is ridiculous, move on guys.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:56 PM
1

I meant in the original accusation. He was the accused. Heres hoping.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:18 AM
4

I am and always have been a supporter for accusers receiving the punishment they would have forced the defendants into. We shouldn't have false charges of any sort!
/r/MensRights10/10/15 04:52 PM
16

They expelled him for rape. As /u/Arcosim said-he will forever be found as the defendant in a rape case. If that isn't enough for a defamation case, then I don't know what defamation is and why it exists.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 04:49 PM
7

-> Here's me, not moving to the States. /s
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:40 PM
19

Wow. That's some f'd up sht.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:21 PM
7

Pretty much. But you know some people are bi, or inbetween. etc
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:18 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:49 AM
2

The guy should have had a punishment When in doubt I think community service is always a viable "slap on the wrist"
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:05 AM
5

skip to calling you a moron
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:04 AM
3

jury nullification CGP Grey explains 'Jury Nulification' (Linked for those who 'need to educate themselves')
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:58 AM
1

The States really need to fix so many laws.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:57 AM
2

It's more like 'Formerly Convicted Murderer' than it is 'former murder offender'.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:53 AM
1

I believe he's reffering to the total number of people-men/woman who 'don't subscribe'.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:28 AM
1

Wow. That Judge should be held in contempt or something, disciplinary action of some sort at the very least. Also 'This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.' Lol and it's here.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:49 AM
3

No h8 m8
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:53 AM
1

Oh that makes sense lol, thanks!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:32 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:31 PM
2

Why don't we have a backup sub by now?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:16 AM
6

OP Maybe try /r/legaladvice Edit: IMO She better do some damn time, I think all accusers of a crime(be it rape, fraud, whatever)should be sentenced to the amount of time that their victim would've been charged for. That'll bring down wrongful imprisonment a little bit.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:34 AM
2

Fixed, thanks!
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:31 PM
6

(Here ya go guys:) Posted: Monday, August 3, 2015 - 07:07 Edit: 14:56 Source: Daily newspapers Rejected request: Paying child support for someone else's children Despite the paternity test that showed the interviewer that Podgoričanin Slavko Cvetkovic was not the father of two children who he was supporting for years, the judiciary has sided with the mother and denied his request for contesting paternity and confirmed his obligation to pay child support. The High Court in Podgorica explained the…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:03 AM
3

Which doesn't include the full numbers for men raped out of prison, for a variety of reasons.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:06 AM
1

Weeeohh I made the list! I don't get why we have the list though? A lot of us post there because we are against what's there, and is this a list of SJWs who posted there(IE subbed to /r/mensrights , posted there) or all users who post there? . Edit: Wow, I'm over there because I said 'Yea I can roll with that.' to the guy who was talking about crowdfunding a 'there is no wage gap' billboard.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:08 AM
4

Yea I can roll with that.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:02 AM
1

Don't worry.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:08 AM
1

Oh no, not at all. I really meant almost nothing, just that defamation sounds like a relevant thing to that. I don't mean anything else, and I don't really know.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:09 PM
1

'defamation' the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:10 AM
1

It could've went a really bad route.. 'sexual harassment allegations.' Anyways, I was talking to bantrain, who was talking about consequences for false accusations, and I merely threw that word into the pile for reference.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:33 AM
1

What.. Is that the context for your previous comment?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:21 AM
2

You were talking about false allegations and stuff, and defamation is a relevant thing, that you should know about if you don't. That's all. "the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel." IANAL, but one could potentially sue for said thing.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 01:00 AM
3

'defamation'
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:35 AM
4

Join us Join us
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:13 PM
33

dump her and keep him. I got a small chuckle outta that.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:52 AM
140

All the top comments
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:35 PM
4

I thought I was going to be angry before I actually read it.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:42 PM
1

Two-way road.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:18 PM
2

Ah, thanks. Edit: Lol if that's what we call politically correct nowadays.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:01 AM
1

PC?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:30 PM
4

Well done on the statistic front!
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:18 PM
8

If they wish to have this program then they should not claim to be open for business. and/or should host this program not in their actual store.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:53 AM
1

Of course a significant number of men would never report such a thing as physical, sexual,(etc) abuse from a woman or their partner(or just in general)
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:16 PM
1

Huh, interesting, very true. I shall listen to that later.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:17 PM
1

All kinds of f*d up either way. But my point was if the legal definition of rape is penetration, think how the number of confirmed rape cases with men as the victims would skyrocket if envelopment was added to that definition.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:10 PM
1

If she 'raped' him, which definition was that? If the definition there only included penetration did they just charge her with it anyway?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:01 PM
1

Exactly. So that means all recorded/confirmed cases of men getting raped are cases where they were penetrated then?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:52 PM
1

Yea so not envelopment right.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:37 PM
4

Theon being raped (on screen) Then mutilated and tortured further
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:03 AM
5

Since when, prove it.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:02 AM
1

That's some messed up stuff..
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:41 AM
1

What went down..?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:52 PM
2

"How to Make Your Ban Permanent" ... "Insult the Moderators, the subreddit policies, or other Redditors" Sounds like you deserved it mate. Sorry.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:10 AM
1

Where is the outrage over those over scenes!! Literally none, oh but a girl gets raped? How about fucking torture! That's equally f*d up. People eh?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:03 AM
3

Alright lol.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:22 AM
2

I am not an American. So forgive me that I don't know all about your controversial legal cases. -_-
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:00 AM
2

Rape-Hoaxing? Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:20 AM
3

Yea someone should continue posting this updates to this on this subreddit OP.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:30 AM
2

Thanks man.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:40 AM
1

Did someone delete the post, I cannot seem to find it?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:33 AM
1

Is that a little short..?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:17 PM
1

Quite weird for an apparent 8 month old account..
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:16 PM
2

Waiting for someone is harassment? Wow that b*tch be tripping.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:48 PM
1

Ahh, thats where you were going. Feminism does not have to set back or oppose equality to be feminism, feminism does have very much to do besides women's rights, Some People take it too far, and warp and expand upon it's core and pervert it to support their own twisted will.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:37 PM
2

You think feminists fight for religious freedom and tolerance?.. Please., Elaborate.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:24 PM
10

Mmmmn tread carefully, there are actual feminists who strive for good, they are just overshadowed by the far too vocal extremists of their group.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:11 PM
3

Feminazis are bad* FTFY
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:15 PM
1

Good idea.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 04:57 PM
70

It really is..
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:11 PM
1

Rightfully so. IMO (The rift part)
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:21 AM
1

I still firmly believe that her saying that was only a grab for political attention.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:35 PM
16

But then we'd have meaningless violence and death. You don't have to be an 'MRA' to support equal rights and to know that meaningless death/violence is fucked up.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:04 PM
0

You suspect Clinton had a legitimate reason for what she said other than a political gain of power? Doubtful IMHO.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:36 PM
0

Old timey cameras amidst war torn terrain-bad cameras, bad lighting, reflection of the camera itself in his eyes, equipment too far for good parts if damaged, bright flash if deemed safe enough for such etc.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:55 AM
5

You suspect Clinton had a legitimate reason for what she said other than a political gain of power? Doubtful IMHO.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:49 AM
1

All should be considered.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:40 AM
7

You suspect Clinton had a legitimate reason for what she said other than a political gain of power? Doubtful IMHO.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:27 AM
1

Oh of course, it should be noted though that out of the large number of soldiers, not as many of them are prone to such action, but it happens and is atrocious.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:25 AM
1

Yes, of course. I tried to use some simple words that I thought would include all bad situations they may face- peril and stress.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:24 AM
19

Wow, that's. That's perfect, the perfect way to explain it. Well done sir.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 06:51 PM
264

The men taking the bullets and the families who grieve for them, but they do not suffer as much as the soldiers. They deal with the worry of never seeing their partners/parents/etc again and what they will do without them, while as the soldiers deal with that, while they are supposed to deal with their current situation leading to them being stressed out, getting injured, PTSD etc. TLDR: Families deal with the loss and how they will acclimate, soldiers deal with the thought of that and the peril…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 02:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter