TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Affectionate_Ad8432 Archive

View 0 posts and 429 comments by Affectionate_Ad8432 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

For women, it seems to be. If we have the technology to give that option to men, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 07:14 PM
1

single men can adopt.. In theory, but they will not allow single men to adopt new borns, only grown children in their teens. Most agencies will consider placing new borns with single moms. Being a foster parent to an already grown child is vastly different than raising with your own values and experiences. For men to obtain that life experience right now, it has to receive the validation of women via surrogacy or traditional relationships. This isn't the same for women. I think artificial wombs …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:32 PM
-1

I think you should look up what a non-sequitur is. It's not an opinion you don't like. It's something that is irrelevant to the conversation. We're talking about artificial wombs, which is obviously related to single fatherhood. Can you follow that, or should I explain more? You also don't acknowledge why this is a rare case. Men rarely get sole custody of kids during divorce because our society assumes the mom is the default parent. Single men who would make great fathers don't get to adopt, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:21 PM
-1

But isn’t the main argument against women who have money adopting kids per getting IVF is that kids actually need both parents at home and a nanny and daycare are proper substitutes for parents. Yeah, but they have the option, don't they? Single men can't adopt and have virtually no reproductive rights. I think this is a cool idea to balance that out. Also most men cannot afford the cost do essentially full time 24/7 child care I never said most, I said many. I've done the math with my income, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:57 PM
-9

Just anecdotal, but the people I've known that have been raised by single dads are generally awesome people. The people raised by single moms? Not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:49 PM
1

It's more like men don't want to have to have their reproductive rights validated by women (especially modern women) in order to become a parent. Many men have enough money for a night nanny and daycare. Money and time aren't issues for some men, and sharing your life with a woman isn't as desirable as it used to be. I think artificial wombs would be an awesome development for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:48 PM
2

Women are smarter in this regard. And they are playing an easier game. No one suspects or wants to punish women. People jump at the opportunity to punish men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 01:55 PM
–

What a coward. I can't stand people who spew sexist things and then try to hide behind feined ignorance. You know exactly what you said. The bar for men here is low, so praise is easy to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 10:16 PM
–

That's not my whole argument. Quit being obtuse. I think women who think that "adult men don't cook, clean, or know how to take care of themselves" are simply only interacting with loser men and are probably losers themselves. As other men have pointed out in this thread, normal men do all these things and more. If you have this opinion of men, you're probably not attractive enough to interact men who aren't like this. I didn't simply call her a loser out of nowhere like you're implying. I think…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 09:09 PM
–

Just an observation. Most men do these things and don't make videos about it. My assumption is that she associates with losers because she is also a loser. It's not a terrible assumption to make, nor a hard argument to follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 08:48 PM
–

Maybe you're not attractive enough to be able to attract men who aren't losers? Most men do these things and don't need to be praised about it. How do you think single men survive?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 08:22 PM
-1

Houses are not fungible assets. You can own a home, but you can buy anything with that unless you sell the home and convert that to cash. You can't provide anyone just by owning a home. You need cash and/or income. Young men tend to prioritize those things over owning non-fungible assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:18 PM
4

I think there's obviously remnants of this idea that men have to provide eventually in order to be accepted in a relationship. Men feel they shouldn't tie up money in a house, the associated property taxes, and household investment before partnering and prefer more fungible assets like stocks that can easily be turned into cash. Women don't have this financial expectation, so they are more likely to tie up their money in assets like this before partnering because they don't have this innate expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:56 PM
4

Exactly, I even see women clearly reading that stuff in public and I always thought it was weird how they are comfortable doing that. I think female sexuality is just much less threatening to society than male sexuality. That is why there are different rules and attitudes towards it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:04 PM
9

Real porn tends to be looked down upon because it can be made under abusive/coercive circumstances Fair point, but I would say animated or AI porn has the same stigma. I'm not sure how much it really has to with how much people care about women who are sex workers. Take sex dolls, for example. Women seem to find this as worse than porn or erotica, but no one is taken advantage of here. I think the stigma is more about controlling male access to sex and remnants of puritanical beliefs than it doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:42 PM
19

Women are already more likely to own sex toys and if you count lude romance novels and fan fiction women already spend far more time consuming pornography. I always thought this was weird how literary porn (romance novels, erotica, etc.) isn't seen as negative as visual porn. I think it sets up the same unrealistic standards and decreases sensitivity to real-life romantic encounters. I guess because it's mostly consumed by women, people are hesitant to call it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 02:28 PM
3

someway women always seem to get involved with the guys that want to play the field Could be a bit of ego involved. "I know many have tried, but I can be the one to 'fix' him." It sucks seeing women friends fall for this over and over, and, worse, they paint all men with that brush based on their experience with a small subset of men. Really screws up their mindset when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:51 PM
12

Don't women have the same hangups? They complain about fuckboys, players, and not having relationships, but then they turn around and have casual sex with them the most and make the men that want to have relationships wait. I don't think logic plays a huge role in people's personal choices. People do and say what they want to in the moment and then complain about it later.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:56 PM
4

But if more women are attracted to alpha males and not beta, why would they wish those alpha guys had some beta qualities therefore, out of curiosity? I don't think most women actually know what they want in a partner until they actually experience it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 02:26 PM
–

A man who refuses the call when his people are threatened? Absolutely. True men think for themselves and don't fall for the hero propaganda that's pumped into boys from birth. No, you don't need to sacrifice your life and body for some cause the government decided it wants to take up. That's not what a man is. That's what cannon fodder is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 11:47 PM
–

Nobody here wants to help you pay for your unwanted kids. That's what abortion is for. It's unwanted because the mother decided to birth it. Women are no longer financially dependent on men, so I'm not even sure why people are bringing up money. Can't women, the financially independent people who decided to keep a child against the will of the person they had sex with, take responsibility for their decision?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:49 PM
–

Not to the child. Are you new to the discussions? Women have the capacity to earn money now. They are financially independent from men. I don't know why this sub acts like this is the 1950's. Crazy idea, but the financially independent person who had the sole choice to keep the baby shouldn't be financially entitled to an unwilling person's money simply because they had sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:23 PM
–

So I'm assuming you're pro-life and against abortions. If women don't want children, they should just keep it in their pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:19 PM
–

men are always accountable because men are in charge What is this? The 1960's. We don't live in a patriarchal society. Women inhabit positions of power now as well. This line doesn't work anymore. Times have changed, and we need the laws to change as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:15 PM
–

mostly so the taxpayers don't get roped in supporting your kid Why doesn't the human who decided to have the child be responsible for it? Young women are financially independent from men and making just as much money as their counterparts nowadays, but we still have this idea that a child needs a man to provide for it. That's not the case anymore. Practice what men have told women to do for decades: abstain. You mean in past decades, right? Women no longer live by this standard. So you are basic…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:10 PM
–

The person who decided to keep the baby against the will of the other person they had sex with. That's my vote for who should foot the bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 01:55 PM
–

The US is 10th in the world in welfare spending per capita, above countries like Switzerland, the UK, Australia, and Canada. This idea that the US doesn't have social safety nets is simply a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 01:41 PM
–

I disagree. I think you'd barely notice a difference. In fact, there would probably be less incentive for these men to interact with women at all, so the unpleasant encounters you're talking about will most likely decrease, not increase. How would less unwanted interaction with men be a bad thing for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 10:03 PM
–

I think the impact on society would be less sexual frustration in lonely men and less dependence on actual women via sex work for that relief. I don't understand how you could see that as a negative unless there was some jealousy involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 09:01 PM
–

It is hard to engage with anything you write because it sounds like a madlib with random words strung together, but i will try. In your post, you reference a comment and then don't list or quote the comment. No one knows what comment you're referring to. I think you're just missing big chunks of explanation, and your writing seems to jump from one disconnected thought to another. You would expect one sentence to relate to the next, but they don't. Take this sentence you just wrote: It all stems …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:44 PM
–

This sounds like the kind of thoughts you have on LSD and then you read them the next day and realize it's complete, nonsensical babble.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:00 PM
9

I mean, someone is the father. They could go after that guy instead of the innocent one. It just sounds like the government didn't want to lift a finger and do the right thing because the victim of this is a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 04:26 PM
11

You don't, as a woman, just get to pick your favorite man in that situation. You have a duty to find out who the real father is. This isn't some reality show. It is people's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 04:17 PM
17

The thing I don't get is why women get so upset and judgemental over this. Let the men that you don't want to have sex with do what they want. Who does this harm exactly? I find it funny that in an age where every sexuality and every identity has to be validated and accepted, we still can't let lonely men who can't get sex masturbate how they want to without being vilified.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:10 PM
10

Men used to have their own spaces, actually. Country clubs, boy scouts, social drinking clubs like the Elks, etc. Women invaded those spaces, all while demanding to keep their own spaces men-free. I'm happy that men are starting to reclaim those a bit even if it's just online. Hopefully, it will turn into actually physical clubs and social spaces eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 02:01 PM
3

Men were key figures in the suffrage movement, though. I'm not saying women weren't. People remember Lucretia Mott, for example, but people don't realize that her husband was actually Chair of the Seneca Falls Convention, which was the first major. Things like this have been erased from history in favor of your narrative that only women were involved in a fight against men. The reality is that even most women back then didn't want the right to vote, and it was a select group of women AND MEN pus…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:13 PM
11

lesbian divorce rates are near 80%, gay men are 20%. Not saying I disbelieve this, but do you have a source? My experience aligns with this quite a bit, actually. My lesbian friends always seem to rush into things and then have them blow up out of nowhere, or they devolve into essentially roommates who date other people. My gay friends are exactly the opposite. I've known couples who have been married since the first year it was legal. I just wondered if there was data to back this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 03:07 PM
3

Women are doing that. With a great deal of help from men. I don't know why you guys keep leaving that crucial point off. My point is that men should stop doing that because the same level of empathy is not reciprocated to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 02:57 PM
3

Women do with a great deal of help from men. Most women's movements in the West were ironically started by men. Maybe men should just stop helping "women's issues" is my point. I'll even take it a step further, women actively worked in Canada to shut down men's shelters. Maybe men should do the same for women's only shelters.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 02:05 PM
4

Yeah, I feel this way about women's issues as well. I couldn't care less about the wage gap. It's not my job to make you more money. I don't care that some places don't have elective abortions. I don't feel the need to care about catcalling, slut shaming, or anything else that women constantly whine about in their daily lives. Aren't you a human as well? Fix it and quit blaming others for these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:23 PM
5

By OP's metrics of gullibility and agreeableness, women are objectively worse than men. Virtually every single sociological study on personality shows that women are more agreeable than men. I'm not sure that OP's one single example is really the dunk they think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 05:46 PM
14

Too many women (and too many men) refuse to accept the truth that she is not special. She can rationalize in her head why she is worthy of a top 5% guy, but the fact that they guys are not interested in seriously dating or committing to her, shows that she isn't on that level. I know many women like this in the city. This is a group of women who spent their adolescent years watching Disney princesses get the handsome princes. Then they went to college and were taught subversely (and sometimes no…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 03:13 PM
3

i am objecting to you talking as if everyone is interested in misleading the people they are dating. That's not what I was saying at all. In my analogy, I'm encouraging you to buy a good, reliable car. I didn't say all cars are unreliable and not worth buying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:36 PM
11

Just because you wouldn't doesn't mean other women wouldn't either. The majority of men don't misrepresent themselves either. Women cheat, monkey branch, become abusive just like men do. I don't think this is really a gendered thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:07 PM
9

No, not really. What are you having trouble with?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:28 PM
30

Car salesmen always show you the best parts of used cars. Realtors show you the best parts of the house and ignore the flaws. But if you buy a clunker or overpay for a crappy house, that's on you. Judging people's intentions and sensing when people are bullshitting you is a social skill. Develop it and stop expecting salesmen to stop trying to sell bad products.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:21 PM
3

32m, only one. Turned out to be a pretty good one, so I'm still dating her. Before that, I would ask out maybe one or two ladies per year. I think that's a good number. In my early 20's, I would do more, but rejection can take a toll on you. I don't think men get enough credit for taking the brunt of rejection and the emotional work it takes to stomach it in the dating world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:11 PM
2

But they aren’t messaging these women because they’re attracted to them. That's all sexist conjecture on your part. That's what your whole perspective on this is based on. Just think about that. You talk like in this study the bottom 80% of men got zero messages and never spoke with anyone Strawman, I never said that, and you know I didn't. I said "men and women have different levels of attraction". The fact is that the average women will receive far more attention and have far more choice in da…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 04:13 PM
5

It's funny how you guys keep bringing up points that support my initial claim. Men take this scattershot approach because men tend to like a wider range of women, whereas women's attraction is more focused on a subset of guys. So, playing the numbers game is really the only effective approach for men. Ask yourself why women don't take this approach. message women they aren’t interested in all the time. This is simply just cope from you. A) there's literally no way to know this and B) men don't w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:00 PM
0

And you're ignoring the initial point of the comment. There are different levels of attraction for men and women. You just cited something that proves the fact that men are more receptive to more women. Why is that hard to swallow for you? And my luck with women had been great. Met one of the few awesome ones 😉 Best of luck to you, though. You're going to need it. You think you're out of the top 20%, when you're actually out of the top 60%. Try dropping your ego a bit, and maybe you'll find some…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:42 PM
3

The average women still received more messages than average men, though. In fact, they received more than the hottest of men. So, this actually disproves your point and bolsters mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:31 PM
5

No, there are different levels of attraction between men and women. You can't apply the 20/80 rule to men. Men found 60% of women attractive in the okCupid study, and that's aligned most studies on attraction. So, by your logic, men are forming their opinion based on the majority of women, not 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:50 PM
6

The 20% doesn't apply to men, though. We have a wide range of attraction than women do. We don't think only 20% of women are "hot".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:36 PM
4

American culture, however, has a VERY strong fixation with high-octane masculinity. Do we? Compared to what, though? Relative to other parts of the world, western countries don't have this emphasis on manhood/masculinity. Western countries are literally as tolerant as you get when it comes to accepting different types of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 04:29 PM
5

No, that's wildly incorrect. The word gender is derived from the French word "gendre". The "Gen" part of that comes from the word "genus" meaning birth or origin. "Dre" means "class or category". The word gender can be literally translated to "birth category". It never referred to [until the 1970's] the societal roles or expectations associated with gender. It referred to what they would class you as at birth based on sexual characteristics. That's why the two words were used as synonyms for rou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:56 PM
0

It's bizarre that this is your take from his post, but ok. No one is "keeping women in their place". I'm not sure where you got this from. You don't know why a man might want to challenge the idea that their attention is so threatening to women? Men's entire chance at social acceptance, procreation, and having a family depends on women and their perception of men who are their age. So men like OP have a vested interest to not be a social pariah for simply interacting with women. That's his hope.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 02:17 PM
0

Why is it important to try and understand why other humans think and have perceptions different than yours? Is that really what you are trying to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:59 PM
2

We can actually trace the roots of the conflating of gender roles and gender to French academia in the 1970's. This idea that gender =/= sex is simply a semantic game they came up with to push their ideas, and now it's taken over the minds of younger people all across the world 50 years later. It's really fascinating how that has worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:49 PM
-2

Back peddling much? We all know you were trying to shut him with "who cares what you think"? That's a pretty juvenile tactic. Just be better next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:41 PM
-2

Why should he care what you think then? The guy is allowed to think and express it. That's what Reddit and this sub are for, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:28 PM
1

Agreed, tell that the poster above who is taking meds because she has emotions she can't deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 04:55 PM
5

No, actually the stats are pretty well reported on with regards to depression and suicide. Women also tend to have more eating disorders, self harm more, and just are generally less well-off mentally. Tough facts to swallow after you swallowed all the "we express our feelings more" propaganda. Good luck with your unsatisfying life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:34 PM
3

I assume you are living at home, as you seem to have no concept of a monthly rent. Wrong, I own a home in my early 30's after i invested wisely in my 20's. I'm just not totally brainwashed to think that's the golden ticket to growing money. I'm looking to retire PERMANENTLY by the time I'm 45 due to investments I made outside of buying a home. Best of luck to you and your wild assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:29 PM
2

Women attempt suicide more than men and report higher rates of depression and being unsatisfied with life. Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 05:46 PM
7

I never claimed homes weren't ever a good investment. It always makes you less liquid, however. Stocks and bonds are fungible, meaning you can sell them easily and turn them into cash for investments when they go down. It's unseen opportunity costs that you are missing. Someone who rents cheaply and invests smartly is going to outearn someone who has their cash tied up in their home. I noticed you ingored the entire crypto thing! I noticed you ignored insurance, property taxes, and home maintena…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 05:45 PM
2

We're seeing this with more female first-time homebuyers. They tend to be house-rich but cash-poor. More young women are buying houses then young men. That's what he just said? Owning a house doesn't make you cash-rich was his point. It usually means you have high debt and low liquidity. It's also not always a slam dunk investment due to interest, property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. For example, if you have an interest rate of 6%, you're most likely paying more to borrow money than…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:07 PM
8

I mean, we have the stats. Women are on antidepressants at double the rate of men. Young women are on them at three times the rate of young men. I understand being on them as a last resort, but to make being on these meds your identity like some women do is what is alarming. I find it similar to people who make drugs their whole personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 03:51 PM
3

I never said you were a bad person. I said I find it weird how people treat them like an accomplishment. I don't go around bragging about the acne medicine I take, for example. It worries me that people are taking them because it's fashionable, not necessary. Emotions are fleeting and not permanent things. I find dealing with emotions in a healthy way involves feeling them, understanding them, and processing them in productive ways. I'm not a psychiatrist, but I don't think antidepressants shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 03:48 PM
16

The number of women I know who openly brag about being on antidepressants is..... alarming. Those meds should be a last resort before self-harm, and they treat them like a trophy. Weird times.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 02:42 PM
5

Or not being able to have children at all
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 01:17 PM
1

entirely dependent on material security and economic leverage That's life, bud. No economic system you can come up with will fix that problem. We need resources to survive. We need to work to obtain them. And yes, in capitalism, we get to decide how we can do that. That's the freedom people are referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 04:24 AM
3

You do realize that you can quit your job whenever you want? You can sell your house and get rid of your mortgage as well. These are voluntary things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 11:08 PM
1

The point is that believing in "no evidence" is not a men's thing like OP is trying to portray. We believe women's words and experiences all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 08:24 PM
8

People who witness a crime don't need evidence to know it happened. They are the evidence. And again, "no evidence" was exactly what Blasey-Ford had except she got a day in the highest court in the land to spew her bullshit. You're literally complaining about something that women have been whinning about for the past two decades, "believe all women." Do you really lack the self-awareness to see that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 02:15 PM
11

I don't need evidence, sweetheart. I've seen the phenomenon myself. Who the fuck records intimate and vulnerable moments like this? You're crazy to think that's realistic. Your hatred of men simply wants you to believe all men are lying about this very real thing that happens. I never believed Smollett, but I also didn't believe Christine Blasey Ford. Guess which one got to testify in the Supreme Court based on simply their word and poor recollection of events. Hint: it's the one with a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 02:07 PM
9

Maybe one or two videos, but not really enough evidence by your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 01:50 PM
17

Ok, so men can discount women's experiences of catcalling and sexual assault if they don't have video proof of the incident? I've never seen either one of these things happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 01:46 PM
0

Woosh
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 03:35 AM
1

The word female comes from the Latin femella, the diminutive form of femina, meaning "woman". It is not etymologically related to the word male, but in the late 14th century the English spelling was altered to parallel that of male. "Female" dates back to 14th century. It's not from black culture, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 02:53 AM
–

The difference is no one in those posts asks, "What should we do with women now?" Asking a leading question about deleting an entire group of people is the part in objecting to, not technology replacing relationships. What makes you think this post is about real life people? What? You use real genders. Are men and women not real to you? It do pathetic when people like racists or sexists try to sneakily slide their prejudice and hatred into posts and then act dumb like no one sees what they are d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:58 PM
–

That's exactly what I thought. Judging what "you should do to a group" is literally one of the most vile things you could do, and this post gets up voted and stays up in this Reddit because it's a genocidal hypothetical aimed at men. I wonder how long a "we've mastered artifical wombs and sex dolls, now what should we do with women?" post would stay up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:03 PM
3

to converge on the same specific conventionally attractive men You're literally describing women. Men have a much wider range of attraction than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 02:41 PM
3

Casual sex or just sex? Maybe you're just assuming it's casual sex they want because of your prejudices towards men's intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 07:00 PM
2

I never said they won't do casual sex. I said, given the option of casual sex with easy women and a good relationship with a loyal woman, they'd choose the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:26 PM
5

True, the average man has had 6 lifetime sexual partners, so yes, most men choose steady girlfriends over ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:20 PM
9

Yeah, ask any man if he'd rather find a loyal girlfriend or an easy lay, and they'll take the gf every time. This idea that men simply want to pump and dump only applies to certain women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 06:04 PM
–

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_stimulus
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 02:08 PM
2

It was more of a war than a genocide if you are able to look at history objectively. The tribes did plenty of killing and massacring of their own. The settlers just came out on top after 400 years of conflict.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 01:14 PM
6

The actual percentage is 8%. There was a study showing that 8% of fathers were unknowingly raising other kids earlier in the thread. Not exactly a coin flip, but also not a percentage you would want to risk 18 years of your life and most likely your chance to raise your own kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:31 PM
–

And some people are attracted to that dynamic. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it's definitely a form of attraction that people engage in and act upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 05:02 PM
–

You have to define "nice". This word has many connotations. It can mean weak or a pushover (generally unattractive). It can mean generous and empathetic (generally attractive). Additionally, not everything is black and white. I've found that some women are actually attracted to pushovers. They like being in control and walking all over their BF's. It's kind of sad to see it in person. If you want to seek out those women, go for it. More power to you. Personally, I'm glad that I live in a world w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 04:55 PM
3

It would be worse if there were no discussion at all. If Reddit was simply subs dedicated to echo chambers, the polarization would be worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 12:11 AM
0

Both should get reproductive rights then.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 01:24 AM
16

Men are still going out to bars more often than women. Some clubs even keep men out and let women in because there's too many men vs. women. I don't think you can really reduce this issue down to men not going out. They do, it's just become less rewarding to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 03:34 PM
8

I don't think so. A presence is simply being in a place. Notice they didn't say, "[this action] made me uncomfortable". They simply say him being in a space made them uncomfortable. It's hard going through life knowing that people will ostracize you for simply existing or having a face.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 05:53 PM
12

So, not what OP was talking? "his presence makes me so uncomfortable" or "his face really triggers my fight or flight mode"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 05:10 PM
8

You think men are right to be stigmatized for.... having a face? I would think anyone in that situation would rightfully feel like a victim of an unjust stigma placed on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 05:04 PM
20

I don't think those words are any more articulate than before as they don't seem to convey any additional information. They are simply euphemisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:59 PM
14

Focus on the real dangers, which is women's choice on men. That's the crux of women's attraction that people don't seem to understand. They want men who can potentially be dangerous if they need protection. Sometimes, that dangerous side of men can be turned on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:25 PM
0

My reply was honest. Yours was frivolous. I'm not sure you know what an honest reply is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:31 AM
-1

But no woman does it ever so.. I mean, your shitty attempt at sarcasm doesn't make this statement true. Good try, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:12 AM
0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_headquarters_shooting Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 12:26 AM
8

You would have access to them if they are yours whether or not you are married, though, right? All you have to do is prove paternity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 05:36 PM
–

I'm honestly amazed that someone can see the censorship of certain male subs, the left bias in all main subs, and insta bans handed like candy to people who participate in this sub and others like it and come away with "Reddit is right wing and red pill".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 12:37 PM
1

Women truly don't have the capacity to empathize on this topic. They are never confronted with the possibility of unknowingly raising a kid that isn't theirs. If a husband cheats, another woman is pregnant, and the other woman starts a new family. If the wife cheats, the man who was cheated on is still responsible for taking care of the kid that is not theirs. When women desperately want kids of their own, they are applauded and revered for following their biological imperative. When men want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:03 PM
4

They are a woman, so they have no frame of reference for being trickled into raising a child that isn't theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 12:42 PM
3

It is to potential partners. Not finding someone attractive has the same effect as finding someone unattractive. You won't consider a relationship with either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:28 PM
8

So if every dating age man was in their peak physical condition (which no country or society, western or not, does) men would reach a 5? You kind of made my point for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:26 PM
11

The word "objectification" simply holds no meaning anymore. It's been misused by feminists for so long that it's now a buzzword used to shame male sexuality in any form. The irony is that most women who try to use the term have plastic male genitalia sitting in their bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:18 PM
30

Note that this post only applies to men with a physical attractiveness at a 5/10 You start a long post with a fallacy right off the bat. The average man isn't rated a 5/10 by women. If you want to address the "average man" in a post, you have to speak to the real average. You have to address the reality that most women find the "average man" physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:11 PM
2

Generally women are more forgiving of fat in men There's been plenty of recent studies showing quite the opposite. Both groups rated the overweight body as most unattractive, which was significantly more pronounced in men than in women. For the thin and hypermuscular bodies, women rated lower body attractiveness than did men. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544/full#:~:text=Body%20Attractiveness,-The%20ANOVA%20for&text=Both%20groups%20rated%20the%20overweight,body%20att…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 10:08 PM
1

Wouldn't their propensity to not date fat indicate they are, in fact, into objectification. Example below from another comment.... I can't think of a worse hell than having to fuck some fatty with a soft dick and no stamina ... Ain't no way I'm fucking a dude with bigger tits than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 10:05 PM
20

why guys prefer looks over bedroom performance Same reason women do. It's social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 09:58 PM
2

I think you missed the point. It doesn't really apply to insults across genders. If you wanted to make a better analogy, men's first insult to each other is camping each other cowards (pussy, bitch, etc.). That's because men don't respect or like cowards, just like how women deep down don't respect promiscuous women (even though they don't like to admit it).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 01:22 AM
1

Even with this data here, your initial statement that "virtually all Korean women" have plastic surgery is false, like I said before. Maybe you don't know this, but beauty pageants are not good indications of what straight men find attractive. They are largely judged and run by women and gay men. Do you think the rail thin supermodels that were pushed by the fashion industry in the 90's are actually what men find attractive? Are the overweight models now as well? No, they are picked to sell wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 05:57 PM
8

The first insult you hear from a woman when she is trying to put another woman down is always "slut" or "whore". That should tell you all you need to know about how other women feel about promiscuous women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 04:48 PM
1

Number one, 25% of women in Korea have plastic surgery, not all. Number two, Korean women and women in general are beautiful despite all the wacky stuff they choose to do with their lips, eyes, nose, etc. not because of them. Is this just going to one of those things where men constantly tell women the truth about not liking something and women just bury their heads in the sand? If you want to get surgeries, that's fine. But don't pretend that this is something men want. The surgeries would simp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:01 PM
6

Good point, maybe in terms of relationships, it's helpful. It's always good to see the other side, and sometimes, your partner is unwilling to say things other women might tell you. But ask most women how they would hypothetically approach someone, and you get the funniest answers. The best is when they try to help you dress as a man to attract women. No, I'm not going to start wearing a fedora and eyeliner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:46 AM
3

I don't know. The best advice I've received is from romantically successful men. I think women have about as much clue as unsuccessful men. You can't really give advice on how something might go unless you've done it before.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:40 AM
2

I don't think you know men very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 09:26 PM
9

Women seem to think that it's a personal attack against them They are right to think that, too. I think the personal attacks go both ways to be fair. When women say things like there's no good men out there or that dating apps are like wading through garbage, what is a man who considers themselves as average or even slightly above average supposed to think about their outlook? That's really insulting, and women say this constantly in real life and online. I think that's where the bitterness come…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:46 PM
0

They don't like obvious (badly done) surgery. They like the "natural" looks that people get surgery to have. Trust me, men can tell. We're biologically wired to notice youth and beauty, and when something is off, we can tell. It's very hard, almost impossible, to replicate nature. Let's do a thought experiment here. If all women magically got together and collectively stopped wearing makeup and getting surgeries, do you think men would want to be with women any less? You'd still have an overwhel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:31 PM
3

And these expectations are set by men As far as plastic surgery, I've never met a man who likes what it looks like. Fake butt, fake boobs, lip injections are all for women and their insecurity. They simply don't look good to men, and it's a major turnoff if I see it on women. I don't think you can blame me on this one. Even makeup is a woman's standard if you think about it. Men would have no problem being attracted to women without makeup, especially if there were no women who wore it. Yet, alm…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:19 PM
1

Not where I'm from. Butchers work in the back of the deli, and the deli is where you buy the meat at the front of the shop. I thought you were talking about dirty jobs, though. A deli worker working behind a counter is not a very dirty job. They are essentially servers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:53 AM
0

like working in a deli Not that it's important to your point, but most butchers are men. Not female dominated at all. https://www.zippia.com/meat-butcher-jobs/demographics/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:47 AM
–

No, that's actually the opposite of what reproductive rights are. You wouldn't say you should have kept your legs closed to a woman who wanted an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 02:42 PM
–

That's not what reproductive rights are, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 01:18 PM
–

So, force a parent to raise a kid they don't want or care about because that's... good for the kid? I'm not following the logic here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 12:46 PM
–

That's kind of washing your hands of the argument and not addressing my point. You can say women and men are different until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't change the fact that we both deserve equal human rights. I'll ask you again because you didn't address it the first time. Do you think a broken condom and an accidental pregnancy should equal a lifelong burden for a man? There's no response to this question over and over again in threads like these because you know, as a woman, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 12:06 PM
–

I'm comparing the measures society has taken to equalize biological differences with laws (equal pay act and title XI) to your unwillingness to do so with this inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:59 AM
–

It’s neither the same in process nor the same in outcome or even consequences. It's precisely the same outcome. Abortion leads to no burden of an unwanted child, so would a paper abortion for men. I find it funny that women fight so hard for this human right, only to diminish it once it is applied to men. You wouldn't claim that women getting an abortion are simply shirking responsibility. They are taking control of their lives by deciding if they want a child after conception. Men should have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:57 AM
–

We have to accept that due to sexual dichotomy we cant equalise absolutely everything here I'm sorry, but that's gone out of the window. You wouldn't use this argument for the pay gap or title XI. I'm not sure why all of the sudden we're comfortable using it now. We need to treat each other with equity in this society, regardless of biology. Women fought long and hard for abortion rights because it liberated them from the potential unwanted burden of having an unplanned child. Men need that same…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:53 AM
–

His point is, that he wants men to have no responsibility at all. He wants to have the same responsibility that women have, which is the opportunity to abort post conception. That's not no responsibility. That's basic reproductive rights, which most women agree is a basic human right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:38 AM
3

There's no need to get defensive. We all knew what you meant. You were calling them gay in an attempt to hurt them. That's the homophobic part. Like I said, just be better next time and maybe think about deleting your comment. What should a gay person, especially a younger gay person, who saw you using it as an insult think?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 11:05 PM
3

Yeah, I know what gay is and using it as an insult is homophobic. If I were you, I'd just move on and try to be better next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 10:50 PM
7

Ngl, you sound homophobic af.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 08:39 PM
20

I'm making these numbers up, but imagine a histogram where the top end of the distribution represents 5% of the guys who have had +10's of partners, and the bottom 50% have had 0-1 partners. The top 5% in this scenario would have had the same amount of partners as the whole of the bottom 50%. Not fair, but the world isn't fair. That's essentially a microcosm of what's going on. The men at the top who find it easy to be with women will cycle through relationships and hookups. The bottom 50% won't…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:10 PM
9

The truth is that men have little interest in women’s sports To be fair, even women don't like women's sports.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 11:12 AM
1

It's happens enough to where you don't seem to notice it when it does happen. What does that tell you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 03:21 PM
1

Ok, me too. I don't understand your question then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:59 PM
1

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:12 PM
1

Yeah, no shit dude. Are you out there raping people because you want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:12 PM
5

No, they didn't say anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 09:01 PM
3

The amount of strawmen in this sub could keep Burning Man going indefinitely. I don't care who you fuck. Just stop whining about who fucks you and dumps you in here. No one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:47 PM
2

I'm not sure what you mean, but I certainly would call them out if they came into this sub blaming women for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 06:45 PM
1

I'm the one crying here? I'm telling your entitled ass to stop crying. You're simply not worth a relationship, and the world knows it. It's tough to swallow, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:49 PM
12

Women should have harsh conditions for relationships but have casual sex w whoever they want but know not to get attached. Oh no! Not that! Please don't! Women in this thread really need to learn what bartering leverage is. No one has ever given a fuck about how men have been treated. Do you think it's a threat to say that you will no longer care when you've never really cared? How does that change anything for men at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:34 PM
5

Oh, a passive-aggressive insult and a moronic reach of an analogy. Thanks Redditor, that really changed my mind. I now care that women undeserving of a relationship are getting frustrated with their inadequacy and blaming it on men. What can I do to help?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 05:29 PM
9

Agreed, this comes off as pathetic as a man complaining about lack of sex. No one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:42 PM
10

No, that's not a rejection. They offered you something, and you turned it down. You rejected their offer. You offered them nothing. You can't get rejected if you never offer anything. You can't just change the meaning of words because you aren't happy with the offers you're receiving.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:15 PM
12

You can't make this threat if you never cared about what men wanted in the first place. And by the way, you have no clue what we want, and you probably never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 04:00 PM
18

Most women don’t want random casual sex You're completely missing the point. If you don't like casual sex then don't have it. Why the fuck is this a problem I should care about? It's like running into the street yelping at people, "I hate eggs! Why do I keep ordering eggs at restaurants? Why do restaurants keep bringing me eggs when I order them? " No one gives a fuck about your self-inflicted problems. The only bitter one here is you and the women here who don't understand that no one owes you …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 03:56 PM
31

I'm sorry, I just can't muster any sympathy for this. It's like a rich person complaining that their caviar went warm. It's simply not an issue compared to people who are starving. Learn some self-control and stop having sex with people you don't know. This is entirely self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 01:43 PM
2

No, it's not rare. It happens quite a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 05:52 PM
10

It absolutely does happen. Matt Damon married a bartender. Jeff Bridges married a waitress. The CEO of my company is married to a hairstylist. I'm not sure where you get this idea that this doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 10:15 PM
8

I think we should tell people that. You shouldn't need to cut your body up and take unnatural hormones to feel good about your actual gender and your body. I think most people agree, but it's politically incorrect/"hateful" to say, so the minority looks bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 09:39 PM
6

Duh, that's because you generally date people you know. But if that McD's worker was in your circle and attractive, men would date and potentially marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 09:27 PM
9

Read the story again. She merely suspected him of cheating. He didn't actually cheat. Let me guess, it's still his fault in your eyes somehow?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 04:35 PM
3

outearning their husbands at an ever increasing rate with no signs of it slowing down. This thing you said was untrue. That's what OP is trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 11:31 PM
–

I see what you're asking, but there's literally no such thing as the "average man". Women with misandric views will say the average man is lazy, unemployed, and can't function as an adult. A woman with unrealistic expectations of men thinks that the average man is 6'3 and makes 200k a year. Desperate women will consider anyone average who looks in their direction. The reality is there are a ton of great people out there, including men who some consider average. The average man works, functions a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 05:06 PM
2

All this article proves is that men seek help less. It doesn't establish that men are actually depressed more (they aren't). It would make sense that less men are depressed so they seek help less for it. What don't you understand about that? Americans are completely over prescribed antidepressants. We aren't under prescribed, as you claim. I guess big pharma marketing is working well on you if you think more people need to be on them, but having 1/5th of women on them is not a good thing, as you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 11:12 PM
2

It does not mean less men are depressed. No actually, there are less depressed men than women. Look it up. There are a lot of men that need to be on anti depressants but are not. I can't tell if you're trolling or not, but I hope you don't seriously believe this. Numbing the population with antidepressants isn't an admirable thing. Having 1/5th of women requiring "medication" to cope with life isn't a good thing. It's crazy that I have to explain this to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 10:25 PM
2

Sure, they are indirectly related. Are they not? The commenter said I claimed that was the sole reason women are so unhappy. No one said or claimed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 06:19 PM
5

because more women are on antidepressants doesn’t mean that the reason they’re on antidepressants is because they don’t have a man in their life. I never said that, but it's kind of telling that your mind went there. This whole post is based on the assumption that women are doing awesome and that it's men who are desperately seeking women. I'm not sure the amount of anti-depressants that women support that assumption. That's all I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 05:53 PM
6

Mental gymnastics is thinking that rampant depression happening to women is somehow a good thing. Anti-depressants should be the last resort after exercise, diet, therapy, and any other method not involving psychoactive drugs...... One-fifth of women are on their last resort.... and you think that's a good thing? Yeah, and I'm the one doing mental gymnastics. I’m saying there are more white people and more wealthy white people who can afford things that other smaller communities and cultures of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:49 PM
3

I'm not sure how you can see that women are twice as depressed and twice as "medicated" ( it is debatable that anti-depressants are anything more than psychosomatic, temporary solution for depression) for it and see that as a positive thing. 1 in 5 women have decided that they can't take life unless it's dulled down. That's a positive thing for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:39 PM
5

It's fine if you were talking about normalizing going to therapy, but we're talking about people who are actually being prescribed psychoactive drugs in order to handle life. That shouldn't be normalized, lol. You don't get prescribed (or shouldn't be at least) anti-depressants unless you are seriously depressed and that's almost 20% of young women. However you want to spin it, that's not a great sign that "women are kicking ass". You think white people are having the hardest time? Obviously not…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:28 PM
7

People generally go to the doctor when they are struggling. Are you not curious at all why women are doing this at an increasing clip each year? So now would you assume that white people are the most depressed and having the hardest time adjusting to modernity? Yes? What is your explanation? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:16 PM
5

Woah, good point. I've never connected those two things. Birth control supposedly influences women to be attracted to less masculine men as well. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030645301300070X?via%3Dihub
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 04:13 PM
2

Why do people think that women using antidepressants is directly related to dating? Did you read what I wrote? I never said that it was directly related to dating. I didn't even mention dating, actually. I said it was related to the unrealistic expectations that media places on women to always be confident boss ladies. Most women and people in general aren't really like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 02:58 PM
7

I never said it's all down to dating woes. My point is those numbers contradict the narrative that women are kicking ass and men aren't nowadays. I think there are way more men out there who are content with being single and without women than this sub would like to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 02:54 PM
5

It boggles my mind with all the data out there that people still believe women aren't as shallow, if not more shallow, when it comes to looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:31 PM
25

That obviously comes from media, particularly social media. Every woman character in the media over the past 3 decades is portrayed as unbelievably competent and unwavering in their convictions. It would be offensive and sexist to portray a female character any differently. The last girl I dated was 28yo and gave off this vibe that she was a badass boss lady who was killing it with a great job and apartment. After 3 months or so, it turns out she's actually really disliking her work and struggli…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:17 PM
4

Men get called potential rapists and the boogeyman of the all-oppressive patriarchy all day in this sub and everywhere else on Reddit, and you think acknowledging this well-known fact is dehumanizing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 01:00 PM
17

Not to mention that dating age women are twice as likely to be on anti-depressants than men. I know women in here like to portray that women are doing great and men are desperately seeking them out, but maybe they should go check some data before spiking the football. The percentages you mentioned and the mental health data from the past two decades paints a completely different picture of how poorly women are coping with the modern dating environment. link
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 12:42 PM
2

Things like this are rarely perfectly linear. We're still double the rates of when they started collecting this data. Again, I'm not overly alarmed yet, but if it doubled in another 15 years, I wouldn't mind calling this an epidemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 06:44 PM
4

The trend is what is troubling more than a hard percentage. Despite what people on this sub think, sex and reproduction are pretty essential to human existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 05:00 PM
–

No, the equivalent would be a man doing something sexual for the woman, like giving her oral or playing out a fantasy of hers. We need to stop equating men spending money on women to women having sex with men. That is essentially prostitution. My point was that a woman shouldn't just wait around or expect their man to buy things for them that they want. They also shouldn't get jealous of other husbands buying shit for other women. That money exchange has nothing with your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 01:36 PM
–

Why are you assuming that, if the couple is going, that the men has to pay? I'm saying if the woman is jealous of another woman getting a hotel room with their husband, she should go out and get it for her and her husband. You don't need your husband to cosign on a hotel room for you both.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:55 PM
–

My point is you don't need two people to buy a hotel room. That's not something only a man can buy in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:49 PM
9

I think even this article acknowledges that the trend shouldn't be judged by one year with new survey methods and only 226 participants. The overall trend is still heading towards more sexlessness. I wouldn't call it an epidemic yet like OP, but it's still troubling.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:34 PM
2

That survey they are talking about defines sexless as no having sex within the past year. I agree with you. They need to use a metric for being sexually active, not just once in a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:18 PM
–

Thanks for asking. Because you being a woman with engrained gender roles is the only reason you have this crazy expectation of your partner to play Santa Claus for you. If you're too lazy and incompetent to work for your own money, don't expect nice things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 11:19 PM
–

What? Do you need a man to cosign for it or something? This isn't the 50's.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 11:15 PM
–

Do you here yourself? You’re saying because of feminism a boyfriend/husband can’t gift his wife something? Holy fuck and you all wonder why women don’t want y’all. Jeez, didn't mean to trigger your inner femcel. Where did I say you can't get your partner something? I said it's wrong to expect your partner to buy you things you want and can afford. That's seriously the mentality of a child. Be a big girl and buy yourself things you want. And yes, if my wife didn't want to cook or clean, I wouldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 11:00 PM
–

Sure a woman could buy herself a hotel just like a male can jerk himself off. Come on, you can't be serious. A shared sexual experience with someone you love is in no way comparable to masturbating by yourself. Be real and stop trolling. If males saw a woman who makes the same amount of money as his wife buy her husband the golf clubs he always wanted for his birthday but when they ask their wife for a $50 gift on their birthday she freaks out saying “that’s too much money”, they would feel some…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 10:30 PM
–

I think the difference between those two examples is that the woman could easily buy herself a hotel experience, whereas the sexual activities are a shared experience that you need the other person to have. I get the jealousy of the second situation, but not the first one. I don't get being jealous of something you could easily buy yourself like that. When I see someone eating some food I like, I don't think, "Wow, I wish their was someone here to buy it for me." I think, "Wow, that looks good, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 10:11 PM
7

So, the adulting part is not the bar. That is my whole point. I'm not saying that regular people people can't find people they are attracted to. I'm saying that a person isn't going to date someone simply because they take showers. Many will still date someone who doesn't take regular showers if they are attracted to them enough. You see this all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:54 PM
7

I never said the "top 5 percent" are only in relationships. Don't put words in my mouth. My point is that the bar is not "simply taking a shower". It's the attraction part. And that bar has gone up in recent years for men. That was OP's question. Would you be in a relationship with someone you are not attracted to simply if they took showers?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:36 PM
10

Your friends have that same requirement, though. They aren't simply looking for a schmuck off the street who is adulting. They are first trying to find someone who they are attracted to and hoping they are adulting in the meantime. So the bar there isn't adulting. It's the attraction part. And that in recent years has gotten higher for men with the prevalence of social media and dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:28 PM
20

From the sound of it, it would be enough to not be a dick, clean your place and shower to be better than most men and succeed with women. Those things you listed are a bare minimum in terms of being an adult in a relationship, but in no way does that guarantee being in a relationship with a woman. What's left off this bare minimum list is the fact that men have to initiate, men have to pay for dates, men generally have to put in way more effort early in a relationship, and oh by the way, you'll …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:23 PM
9

That is pretty much the same thing, and you didn't ruin it, you made it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 09:57 PM
21

Is this the sub's first femcel post? I feel like this is a landmark moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 09:47 PM
10

Like if we look at any group that’s ever struggled socially - women, lgbt , POC… they all organize themselves, march, create programs, build communities meant to help each other and men just don’t. I feel like women and other minority groups take for granted that you can't just create "men's groups" anymore. "Men" is essentially the only category of people you can't create an organization like that for. There's no "men only" scholarships. There's no "men's only" programs or leadership groups. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 12:21 PM
1

I don't think it works that way...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 06:56 PM
1

I never said the guy who had sex with a different woman every other week didn't have urges. People like that typically feel urges constantly, strong ones, in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 04:13 PM
6

Hourly basis? Those are rookie numbers there, bud. But seriously, I think a person who is going out and going through all the effort to get laid with a different chick every other week is way more horny than someone who simply has the urge to masturbate +10 times or so in a day. Maybe if you actually masturbate +10 times a day, but not simply having the urge.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 01:09 PM
2

testosterone deficiency You may be surprised to learn, but ED is more likely caused by high levels of estradiol (form of estrogen) rather than low testosterone. You always hear thar low testosterone is the problem, but the science is actually pretty inconclusive on the relationship between ED and testosterone. Levels of estradiol were significantly higher for ED patients...The current study, with 88.39% of participants being younger than 40 years old, indicated that elevated estradiol levels wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 11:58 PM
1

why on Earth would we criticize the mother when she is the one who stepped up and took on the role of parenting Not saying I agree completely with OP, but society tends to do this in Western countries because women have complete control over the decision to bring life into the world. That's why we tend to focus on the decision of the mother because, ultimately, they decide whether or not to have an abortion or put the baby up for adoption. Men are essentially passengers after conception. It's up…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 06:17 AM
1

The reality is there would be many men who would talk to the top women. Most men would talk to the average women. There would be some women who don't get approached and also men who don't talk to any women at all as well. What you're missing is that there would be a tiny, tiny fraction of the women who would approach any of those men. Most of the women in the room wouldn't approach any guys at all. So, who really is at fault here?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 06:07 AM
1

I mean, I was simply pointing out the "80/20" wasn't from a 2015 survey of 27 men as claimed by that trash article, but I guess I'll bite and go into this data from 2009. So basically, guys are fighting each other 2-for-1 for the absolute best-rated females, while plenty of potentially charming, even cute, girls go unwritten If 80% of users are men (4 to 1), wouldn't that mean that men would inevitably have to fight for attractive women on the apps? I'm not sure how you think that's avoidable. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 11:36 AM
3

This article falsely claims that the source of "80/20" is from an article from 2015. This idea actually dates back to 2009 when okcupid released their aggregated data. This is not from a survey of "27 guys" as claimed. I have no idea where they even found that because it's not in any of their links listed. Here's the okcupid trends blog posted back in 2009 outlining it if you're interested. The data is actually from aggregated data from their app, not a survey of 27 men. As you can see from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 03:16 AM
2

I know you only have two, but most people have more. Hate to break it to you, but men get assaulted more than women in public. Read a book, idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 02:40 PM
0

Men can be assaulted to. Why is women being assaulted a problem and the other is not?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 02:27 PM
4

When it comes to single moms, it's more the act of picking a guy in her past that was clearly a bad choice that is the turn-off. You don't want to be the next bum in her line of terrible decisions. It's not about the kid at all. There are traumas that come with losing a kid, but that is not something that I would ever hold against someone. You'd seriously have to be a psycho to do that. For example, if there is just a deadbeat dad orbiting around the single mom, turnoff. She chose to be associat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 01:49 PM
2

Other people in the carriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:32 PM
-1

And men don't get harassed in public? You've never seen a video of a guy getting randomly beat up on the train. They happen all the time. I know you think you're standing up for women here, but you're essentially treating them like children. They can stand up for themselves just like the rest of us. They don't need a segregated carriage to take them places. This is just ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:31 PM
2

I assume you were in favor of racial segregation as well then. "Separate but equal" was the insane justification back then. You seem to be using it now to justify this discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:25 PM
1

The fact that you think women deserve to be free from harassment while men aren't is the privilege they are talking about. Men, in fact, are more likely to be physically assaulted in public by strangers than women. I think you're basing your opinion on outdated and offensive stereotypes of men and not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:23 PM
5

Yes, one is a public space that everyone should have a right to use. One is a workplace that is essentially a private space that you have to be invited into. It's strange that we're ok with the former being segregated, and we over legislate and impose "equality" on the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:20 PM
12

Yes, I am a pretty big, intimidating guy, and I have a fake black band that I wear out sometimes to specific places to put people at ease. For example, I like to solo camp and wearing it seems to ease people's fears around campsites or on the trail. If I'm going somewhere alone like the movies or a restaurant, I find I get fewer stares or worrying looks my way. At bars, it helps people be more sociable with me. As far as dating, I don't notice any difference wearing or not wearing the ring. I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 03:45 PM
3

Flair checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 03:09 PM
2

My original point was more so that men wanted an hourglass figure, a good butt, big boobs, small waist, not too tall, fit but still thick, long hair, petite and so on and so forth. Women don’t seem to care as much. Dadbods, fit, skinny and chubby is all viable preferences depending on the woman. Yes, I thought this until I saw that study. I think most women are a little more shallow about weight than they care to admit. I think your statement about wanting a good body is true for fit men, but it…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 01:00 AM
10

Women care less about weight and body type I was actually surprised to learn this is not true and a little more complicated than that. Back in 2016, the University of Surrey did a study where they asked people of various sizes/genders to interview and rate the attractiveness of other people of various sizes. What they found was that women judged people based on their weight more than men, but were also the most judged (i.e. the fitter women rated the unfit women as unattractive, fit men didn't j…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 08:22 PM
1

I'm not complaining...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 01:27 AM
4

Seemed to work out for Gates' and Bezos' wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:44 PM
13

Those probably tainted women's expectations more to be fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:27 PM
5

Vowing to love and care for someone publicly in front of all of your loved ones is a huge demonstration of commitment and one that alot of people want. Plus to be a family together. Not really, the social stigma is entirely gone, I would say. You don't need marriage to be a family either. That's simply a contract between partners. It has nothing to do with family structure. The 50% statistic isn't false, as you say. That's the reality of the frequency of divorces. It's literally a coin flip. How…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:07 PM
7

You can love someone without being married to them. The commitment part is a fallacy, considering 50% of them end and they can be broken at any time. A gym membership is more of a commitment nowadays. If someone truly loves you, they shouldn't need a legal contract to support you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:49 AM
2

I think the opposite is happening, actually. There are certainly a lot of women complaining online that they can't secure relationships with men. Younger women are almost twice as likely to be in relationships (or say they are at least) than younger men. It seems like the casual sex market is filling the sexual needs of young men, and they simply don't need relationships from women anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 06:50 AM
2

I don't know. You used to have to marry a woman to be with her. Seems like modern women are pretty accessible compared to the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:43 AM
3

Men gain financially from marriage while women lose I know what study you are referring to, and you are wildly misrepresenting the findings. That portion of the study only looked at household income, not settlements or rulings of the divorces. Women generally marry men who make more money than them, so of course, they will lose household income if they split, but that's not even remotely the full picture. Alimony, out of court settlements, legal fees, child support/custody, and asset split rulin…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 11:22 PM
7

Married men are happier and live longer. Those other things you said were incorrect, but this one is the most incorrect. That study had been torn to shreds for everything from selection bias, mischaracterizing divorced men as never married, and many other things. Marriage does not increase the life span, nor the happiness of men. There's no correlation there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 11:14 PM
33

There's also a massive amount of selection bias in the men's side of that study. They said they were happier in relationships, but they didn't account for the fact that happy men are more likely to get into relationships in the first place. This study doesn't show that men are happier after they get into relationships as they claimed. It shows that happy men are more likely to be in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 04:35 PM
3

The boy scouts were sued, you idiot. So were the Elks, so were country clubs, so we pretty much every male only club. You can't possibly be this stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 08:45 PM
8

Men are also more likely to have a side piece. Not in this age range. Women in their 20's tend to cheat more than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 11:43 AM
7

I'm not sure you are aware, but there are women only gyms. There are women only clubs and organizations that exist. So, while I agree with you that men change the dynamic of women's friend groups, that need is clearly being met already. Meanwhile, men and boys can't even have an organization like Boy Scouts without it being invaded by women. Organizations like country clubs, social clubs like the Elks, and now even fraternities were all setup by men for men to socialize, and for some reason, wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:13 PM
27

Women don't detract from the experience of hanging out with your bros. I disagree. Women tend to try to police the behavior of men when they are around. You can't joke around or be yourself. There's also a noticeable lack of drama and infighting in the men specific places I've had the pleasure to be a part of. It sucks that these places are slowly going away.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 01:36 AM
–

you don't have to know ALL women to understand that's not true Yeah, I hate this "not all xyz" defense that crops up in this sub. It's literally impossible to discuss topics about dating without using generalities. What do these people want to do? Cover every single individual's likes and dislike in every single comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 12:19 PM
1

Good point. We're simultaneously told that women are just as horny and love sex as men, and also, men are lonely because of how much they want sex. They are lying about one or, more likely, both of those.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:21 PM
-3

Citation is all the men who have pumped and dumped her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:19 PM
15

Yup, and lesbian dead bedrooms are a known thing in the LGBT community. Not saying it doesn't happen in hetero relationships, but it seems to happen a lot more in relationships between women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 11:29 AM
12

Exactly, the fact that it isn't a choice was the whole concept of the gay rights movement. People opposed to it would argue you can just choose not to be gay. What a dumb comment by the original commenter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 01:16 PM
–

Men have a bias towards things, women towards people. Professions that focus on things are scaleable. Professions requiring personal focus aren't typically. Everyone knows this. Welcome to the club, though. Better late than never.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:53 PM
–

I hate to break it you, but both are rooted in biology. I think you're the one who can't deal with their fee-fees. Maybe take a break?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 10:00 PM
–

"Sorry, men just naturally make me money. The world is unfair. " Said no feminist ever
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 09:53 PM
5

If they are constantly terrified of all men, they need professional help. To be fair, they sure are taking a lot of antidepressants and other meds nowadays. The professionals are making bank on the anxiety induced by feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 09:48 PM
2

Nothing you just said contradicts what I did. That's not what a strawman is. Are you now backing off your poorly informed position that men form parasocial relationships with pornstars? Because that is what it seems like you're trying to do...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 09:33 PM
3

why certain body shapes Surprise, body types aren't people. If what you were saying were true, pornstars wouldn't age out at 28. Men would support the pornstars no matter what they look like. In reality, pornstars fill fetishes for people, not social needs, and men stop looking at them once they stop filling that role. Men, by in large, follow porn categories, not the pornstars themselves. Are you really arguing that people don't objectify female pornstars? I can't believe there is actually some…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 08:03 PM
3

That's not what a parasocial relationship is. A parasocial relationship is one where you develop a fake friendship or romance through Medora. Most men when they watch porn don't give a flying fuck about the people in it. Maybe women do this, but men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 06:48 PM
14

Watching two random people have sex would be voyeurism, which is still pretty weird, in my opinion. But it ain't cuckolding. You need a relationship with the girl in order for it to be that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:54 AM
3

At least it gets you laid. That's something, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:23 AM
2

Ok? What about my comment contradicts what you said? I literally say at the end of my comment that it is silly to play the blame the game with divorce. I think you're the one who needs to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 02:12 AM
0

Yeah, I agree with what you said before. I just think it's silly that we try to play the blame game in either direction for divorces in modern society. No one, outside of the religious communities you mentioned, has the moral fortitude or values to follow through on lifelong promises anymore, especially when there's no social or legal repercussions for breaking that promise. No fault divorces have simply shattered the institution.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:22 PM
4

Yeah, you could turn this whole argument around and say that men cheat because the women are no longer fulfilling martial needs. Society sets up less support for men, so that's why substance abuse is an issue. DV is under reported for men because there's no support system. I'm not saying these arguments are valid, but they are just as valid as what OP is doing. The blame game is pretty stupid to play when both people are breaking the promises they made. Marriage, at the end of the day, is really…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 05:53 PM
24

For real. One of the women in this picture is literally married to a former NFL player.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 03:32 AM
11

You realize one of the women you posted is Maxine Waters, and she's been in a relationship for almost 50 years with a former NFL player? You are literally debunking your own ideas with the pictures you posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 03:30 AM
-1

Prostitution often exists because women have no other financial options to cover their expenses — primarily in women who are not even living above their means…it’s inherently exploitation, regardless of consent That's an interesting take. Do you think the people who benefit from the labor of oil rig workers, trash collectors, or any other extremely dangerous physical jobs are misandric in nature then? These people take these dangerous jobs out of lack of options, and society tends to view their …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:22 PM
2

Keep in mind, the IQ data of graduates is from 1994. That's almost 30 years ago. Things have changed a lot since then. College is way easier now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 02:02 AM
4

It's not like men are either geniuses or troglodytes. Relative to women, they are. Men are more likely to fall at the tail ends of the IQ distribution. More chess grandmasters are men, more inmates are men, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:58 AM
2

This is it, in my opinion. College used to be only the top 1% IQ people going to study, research, and push the boundaries of human knowledge. College is more a factory and checkbox to be ticked now for the middle range of IQ now, which women are more likely to be in. Gates, Jobs, Wozniak, and Musk all dropped out of college and are obviously insanely smart people. College just doesn't have any purpose for those high-end IQ people anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:55 AM
14

That's a great example. We've known that astrology is bullshit since the 18th century. I can't believe people still believe in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 10:47 AM
1

I'm attracted to intelligence and common sense, so that is a "no" from me, dawg.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 10:45 AM
10

I have a gf, and I am not bitter against women. I like to participate in this sub because it is genuinely the only place on Reddit I've found that you can discuss these sort of issues without getting downvoted to oblivion and banned. All other places are echo chambers in either direction. I don't think we should just assume men who stand up for their positions are bitter towards women. We don't do this towards the women who complain about men's behavior. Gender relations and expectations are alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:06 PM
-4

Fuckboy = asshole Again, women aren't very good judges of this, so it really means nothing to men. The "fuck" part of fuckboy indicates you are, at least subconsciously, thinking about them in a sexual context. If not, you'd call them an incel/virgin or simply just an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 12:48 PM
16

someone who is emotionally immature, lacks empathy, and has no enjoyable personality traits. No offense, but women are terrible judges of these things, so it doesn't mean much to men to call them that. What men simply hear when you can them "fuckboy" is that you want to fuck them, which is ultimately a compliment. The other judgments that come with it are kind of irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:50 AM
1

Men are pretty good at technological advancement, though. Double-edged sword there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:45 PM
2

I agree with your first point. Divorce settlements are heard by the court often but not ruled upon. You're exactly correct there, but... Women typically marry up Yes, they do. Only 16% of women marry men who make less than them. 84% of the time, the opposite is true. About 16% of opposite-sex marriages in the U.S. have a breadwinner wife, up from 5% five decades earlier, Pew reports. When the wife is the breadwinner, however, her median earnings are about $88,000 per year, while her husband's ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:58 PM
0

So, let me get this straight. Your position is that you know more about divorces than the attorney who wrote the article? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see how this plays out. I'm still waiting for one of your sources or actually just anything that is remotely coherent at all coming from your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:07 PM
1

Women aren't largely excluded from power, though. Voting is power in our society, and, even then, women still hold office and work on government. Even by your own definition, it fails to pass that. This reminds me of that Eric Andre meme where he shoots Hannibal Buress and then turns to the camera and says, "Who shot Hannibal?". Like, you guys have power now. Why do you fantasize and fetishize the idea that you don't? It seems like you guys don't actually want the power you have, and you like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:33 PM
0

Did you read anything I wrote? I literally linked a quote from the study itself, and then you ask for sources, lol (while you provide none yourself). Even the study that is often quoted here acknowledges that it did not look at anything but household income. What do you expect? The woman to magically just start making as much money than the husband they picked because they make more than them? Do you have any idea how this works at all? Household income isn't a part of divorce settlements. A jud…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:26 PM
1

Wrong, voters are leaders in a democracy. Our government officials are public servants who are there to uphold the will of the voters. You can't keep endlessly playing the victim when you, in fact, have the power in our society. It's getting pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:14 PM
7

Less than 10% of divorces end in alimony and women are less better off financially after divorce. I see these stats parroted over and over again in this sub and they are bullshit cherry-picked stats. Ask any divorce lawyer, and they will shred these to bits in 30 seconds. First off, 10% of divorces end up with alimony decided BY THE COURT. Most divorces go to settlements before that because men know courts fuck them over and they just try to get it over with before they are paying $100k for both…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:17 PM
2

Wait 5 years and reevaluate your decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:57 PM
2

It's hard to get past your bigotry, but no, the world wasn't made by men for the benefit of men. That world wouldn't include 90% of inmates being men. It wouldn't include 99% of combat deaths being men. It wouldn't include a suicide rate that is drastically higher in men. Your worldview comes from a place of ignorance and hatred, not empirical observation of what is going on around you. Here's a tip. If you want people to think that women can give real answers, try coming up with an original tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:28 PM
2

Hurts to know that there are women running the patriarchy, too, doesn't it? Maybe there isn't some cabal of men running the world like others have fed to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:25 PM
2

So some made-up shit you have going on in your head? I'm looking for real answers, not short story prompts written by Margaret Atwood.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:17 PM
2

Lol, then what makes it a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:14 PM
3

If you think being able to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a surgeon to cut into yourself to temporarily satiate your vanity, then yeah, modern women sure are doing better than traditional women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:51 PM
0

Both sexes. Look at the Waltons.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:25 PM
2

Thank you, that is the right question. It's voters. The majority of voters are women. Do they just not teach about our form of government in school anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:21 PM
2

Oir government is "ruled" by voters. The majority of voters are women. Ergo, our government is ruled mostly by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:19 PM
6

Please get your science and rationality out of here. We here only want random anecdotes and anonymous Reddit users claiming they are women who have higher libidos than all their bfs. That's the only way to get at the real truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 12:25 PM
2

And men mature later than women. Ergo, you like older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 09:09 PM
7

Yeah, but it kind of contradicts the "women actually hate older guys" narrative that this thread is purveying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 07:13 PM
1

There's no "omg you are a man, you will age like fine wine, while Becky will turn into a pile of shit". I mean, you're taking it to the extreme and saying that's not true, which I agree. But the general "men mature later than women" and "women age out faster than men" is true. You will always hear that men mature later in life than women, but then you see posts like this that deny the flip side of this, which is that women age faster than men. I think this sub really needs to get its story strai…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:55 PM
8

I'm dating a 25 year old as a 32 year old. It happens, and it is not financial. I don't think the women you are talking to are willing to admit this to you, but a lot of them like older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:16 PM
9

People here always say that men mature later in life. Now, people here who say that men do this are Betabux if they mature later in life. Which one is it? It sounds like people here just want an excuse to hate on men in their 30's who are dating all the 20 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:03 PM
8

That's the same for women, though. An attractive woman doesn't just become an old witch at 30, but it's objectively worse than the same woman in their early twenties. A man who is 30 doesn't automatically become Brad Pitt, but he's definitely more dateable than he was as a broke 22 year old just out of college. The wall is simply an observation of the fact that women do, in fact, age and become less attractive as time goes on. That is hard to swallow for women who are used to getting attention t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 05:46 PM
16

Exactly this. It isn't to say that once you hit 30, you automatically start getting women. It's that men are judged on different things, and those things take time to acquire. A man in their 30's is much more likely to have those things, but the 30 year olds who don't won't have any better luck. It's not the age of 30 that women are attracted to. It's the things those men of 30 years old age are more likely to have that they like more. Signed, a guy who has had more attention from women in 2 yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 05:38 PM
8

This is the problem with mental illnesses whose diagnosis relies on subjective observation. You can't run an objective test to figure out if someone is on the spectrum. There's no incentive for psychologists to say, "no, you don't have a problem, so please stop paying me money". The patients also are dying for explanation (or sometimes an excuse) to why they have short attention spans or are socially awkward. That's how we've ended up in a situation where someone thinks half of their class is au…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 03:51 PM
2

If you want a true proportion, men find 60% of the women they see on apps average to above average. 40% below. So, 60 women in the room you find attractive and the other 40 not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 01:30 PM
2

largely been run by men to benefit and advantage men. Wrong, societies have been set up to facilitate a situation where women have a less harsh life in order to procreate and men are out working to death to provide for them. Get that feminist bullshit out of your head. It's not 'biology', promiscuity has VERY negative consequences for men and women who end up with a male slut. Wrong, it is actually biology. Pregnancy is a thing. Look it up. If a woman is sleeping around, no one knows who the fat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 02:03 PM
1

Depends on the person, of course, but roughly 28 to 32 is usually where guys hit their stride professionally. You also see guys start to look more mature physically as well at that time. That's the age when you start to see less physically attractive guys with more attractive women, I would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 01:35 PM
1

Yeah, I'm sure you like your men to be pristine virgins who no one else wants to fuck. /s You're not fooling anyone. Pretty much every culture that's ever existed has looked down upon female promiscuity and has not cared about male promiscuity. It's just biology. Get over it. Women need to stop pretending to be men and just realize that promiscuity is gross for women. No one wants a woman that everyone has been in. Even other women know this. "Slut" is the first insult you'll hear a woman throw …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 01:24 PM
3

You're deluding yourself if you think men and women don't have different behavioral standards either.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:47 PM
12

Also, a lot of what is considered 'stylish' for women is just unattractive in my opinion. I actually just see women out and about in yoga pants or sweatpants. Maybe San Francisco is different, but women in the past were far better dressed than most women nowadays on a daily basis, in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 09:39 PM
13

I've noticed this, too. I think the explanation for this is the value gap at an early age. When women turn 21, they are basically their peak market value. Men haven't had time to make their value. They'll typically reach their peak later in life. The super attractive women in this age range date up and, therefore, older. The attractive men of this age can't/ don't want to do that, so they take the hottest they can get, which is the average women of their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 12:50 PM
2

I completely agree with you, but I wanted to point out one thing. The negative traits you mentioned are only negative because of the framing they use. For example, masculine violence is seen as bad, but what happens when you need to stop someone or something? What if you need to fight a war against an enemy? You need masculine violence to stop it. It's only then when they frame masculine violence as a good heroic thing. Competiveness is bad, but what kind of person wants an uncompetitive male pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 04:50 PM
4

Yeah, that's what I thought. They're just describing a good person, not a masculine person. I think people are hesitant to actually just say masculine features and characteristics. The media and academic world have made it uncouth to say masculine people are bigger, stronger, more stoic/less emotional than their feminine counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 03:02 PM
2

Masculinity and femininity are relative to each other and always will be. You can't give a good definition to one without giving the other. There's also many layers to this. You could give the biological definition, which is very straightforward (hairy body, larger muscles, facial features, etc.). You could give the social or cultural aspects of masculinity, which differs from culture to culture. You could also give the political/academic ideologically-driven version of masculinity that aims to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 02:49 PM
3

You are literally describing men's situation, not women's. No, most average women aren't invisible, average men are. Men rate average women much higher in attractiveness than men. Average to below average women receive the same amount of attention as super attractive men online. The only reason an average woman would feel invisible is if they are completely ignoring the average men approaching them. They only think attractive men can give them attention. Average men approaching them is considere…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:16 PM
3

The "average" for women is not the "average" for men. You say you know women, but ask an average man how many times they've been approached by women in their life. That's the selection bias in talking about. Men inquire, and women say yes or no. That's how it's been for a long time now, and, in that scenario, women are indeed the selectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:03 PM
2

Are you disputing that women aren't more selective than men? I've never even heard anyone claim that before.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:54 PM
3

Don't you all claim that men act a certain way because women started acting that way? Yes, in terms of dating behavior, that is what I said. I think you misread what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:32 PM
–

He was my age, but it did happen and not from a woman or girl. This was school bullying? You made it sound like a man accosted you in the street and told you that. Jesus Christ, grow a backbone and get over it. That's what I would want my daughter to do. I'm starting to see why companies would not hire you. Emotional maturity is a huge part of being a professional. If you are still dwelling on high school teasing, you have some maturing to do. And you realize other people have experience, too, r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 12:27 PM
–

You're talking to a Texan, and I know what you're saying is complete bullshit. At Texas A&M, they are clamoring for women who are good in STEM. There's a literal floor in Zachary dedicated to that. It's the same at UT. It's the same at Texas Tech. It's the same at pretty much every large university with an engineering department in Texas. If you haven't found a job in Texas out of college in engineering as a woman, it simply means you're just not very good at engineering. There are literally tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:50 AM
6

"You want to call me a slut when I'm a 16 year old virgin, and you want to tell me I'm not capable in the workplace? Fine. Men get to select that, believe me no woman has ever had control. What reality do you live in where this is happening? Most HR departments are full of women. There's literally laws against discriminating on sex. And no one is calling 16 year old virgins sluts. You're making up scenarios to get mad at because you can't handle the fact that what I said was true. Maybe you need…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 11:21 AM
13

Wait a second, what is a man? We are rightfully relaxing the rules of women (no longer expected to be virgins at marriage, have an equal share in the household decisions, can be career minded and earn the same income, can wear what they want, etc.), but why are "men" still expected to be "men"? What does being a man entail to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:20 PM
5

You think women don't suffer from men not being reliable? No, I don't think women don't suffer. All humans suffer from stupid decisions. I'm just wondering, when do women start being responsible for their behavior? Are we just stuck in this vision of the world where women don't have agency and just follow men around like puppy dogs? I don't think that vision is true or has ever been true. We can't just keep saying "men suck" to fix the problem. Not only is that not true, but it doesn't fix anyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:16 PM
2

On the marriage part, did you know that men would often serve the punishment for crimes committed by their wives? Married women couldn't typically obtain a line of credit without a man (because they didn't work), but they also couldn't go to debtors' prison, they couldn't face bankruptcy, and they couldn't be thrown in prison if they had a child. Now, why would men, who supposedly set up a system for their benefit, set it up this way. Hell, if men were in charge and set up a system only to benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:10 PM
2

No worries, I don't think you implied that either. I'm just saying that's not an accurate view of the world. It's far too black and white to say men created the world, and women sat and watched us. In my opinion, this trend started from the third wave feminist movement in the 1990s. It's recent. That movement popularized the ideas we were just talking about. The "logic" goes... Men created the patriarchal society we live in today to oppress women [false] Therefore, men's society that they create…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 06:21 PM
8

I don't buy the idea that men alone built society. I think that this idea was used in the past to justify controlling behavior towards women. More recently, women use this to absolve themselves from responsibility. In reality, both sexes have control over different aspects of society. Sure, men have a great deal of control over resources, but on the flip side, women also make the majority of purchasing decisions. Women have almost always (post arranged marriage days) asserted a great deal of con…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:50 PM
7

You're missing the point. It's not that women don't suffer from their bad decisions. It's that those decisions aren't men's fault. They are humans with agency, no? This whole post is about women trying to shirk responsibility for the dating culture and standards they created.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:22 PM
15

Of course, there are a lot of things contributing to it, but saying it's men's fault for the way women are behaving is just backward. That's not what is happening at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:10 PM
15

Lol, just a realist. I think women are bitter that equality comes with a bit of accountability as well. You can't claim you're equally competent and still play the "damsel in distress" card. It's time to put on those big girl pants and take accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:02 PM
59

Women control this aspect of society. They are the selectors. I don't know why you're complaining about this to men. Women control their behavior in terms of dating/ sleeping around, and men react. Men aren't going around like vikings kidnapping women and taking them back on their boats as concubines. Modern dating is about courtship, not pillaging, and women control that with their behavior. You want to be promiscuous? Fine. We'll stop committing to you in relationships. You want to share some …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 04:44 PM
–

I am a machine learning specialist who is contracted to a consulting firm. I assure you I have no "fuck off" time, definitely not as much as SAHM. I take lunch breaks (now) and earnestly work the rest of the day. Have you thought that maybe men don't "want to admit" this because it's not actually true for them? Just because you've managed to trick a company, a charity nonethelees, into paying you for doing nothing doesn't mean that is everyone's experience. Don't you feel bad taking that money f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 05:58 PM
–

Yes, they are. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12l5b2u/male_vs_female_income_in_childless_couples/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=2
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 10:20 AM
–

These people have clearly never worked a serious job in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 10:17 AM
–

I think you just had a shitty father. Most fathers love their children and don't view them as a chore.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 10:05 AM
10

It's hard to tell anymore, man. I'm still not sure after reading it again. People belive crazy things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 07:19 PM
11

Nope. If you preach equality and say you hate gender discrimination, it's time to put that into actual practice. Unless this whole thing is just a gendered power play, and you don't actually mean the shit you say....
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:43 PM
6

It's 2023. It's time to put on those big girl pants and start acting as equal adults. Men are less emotional naturally, and yet we hear constantly how men have to be open up more. It's time for women to do the same and stop relying on men for validation. You can do it. The fact that you are comparing withholding love to relying on your partner to drag you to your ambitions is so fucking toxic. You must be an absolute nightmare in a relationship. Do you just stop loving someone if they aren't car…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:40 PM
4

No, you shouldn't rely on your partner to validate your ambitions, whether you're a man or woman. The "woman aren't confident" is from the 1950s. Please get with the times. And yes, emotional needs are a part of maturity. Children need their hand held to cross the street because they are immature. If you need your partner to handhold you to fulfill your dreams, you are immature. One could say men can be independent and not depend on their partner for sex. Your argument is silly. This is probably…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:26 PM
21

Those are just long, academic sounding words that justify sexism. Let's face it, most people who use those words simply don't like men and are trying to rationalize the hypocrisy of being anti-sexism in one scenario while being extremely sexist in another.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:19 PM
5

Agreed, every marriage I've seen where the wife calls the husband their best friend or vice versa has ended badly. You need friends outside of marriage you can confide in. Putting all of that (sexual partner, marriage partner, best friends, etc) into one relationship puts so much pressure on it that it eventually falls apart in an ugly way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:10 PM
10

I don't think women need a man to validate or give them attention to fulfill their ambitions. If you are a woman who does this, you are just as emotionally immature as the "nice guys" you are criticizing. Be an independent adult and don't rely on your partner for validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 05:05 PM
3

Apparently a lot, if you listen to anything else that gets said when 80/20 is cited for the millionth time. I agree with you that it gets brought up too much, but so is the "all men want is sex" trope. The 80/20 is usually brought up when women complain that "no man" wants a relationship with them, and then it turns out they are only pursuing extremely hot, unavailable guys with tons of options. It's not a mystery what's going on there, but women don't like to acknowledge they are swinging out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 01:17 PM
2

Jesus, have some self-respect. You realize women are more than just orifices, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 02:19 PM
9

I don't just want to put my dick in a woman. I like the company of women. Signed, a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 12:22 PM
0

each parent is contributing equally That's actually not how it works. It varies state by state, but courts typically take a percentage of your income. It's not an equal amount per partner. So men almost always end up paying more than a woman would because women don't marry down. And don't get me started on the bias in custodial hearings. I've seen women with lengthy arrest records get custody over a father with none. I've seen fathers denied custody because of the car they drive (not kidding, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 05:24 PM
1

Sure, but we are talking about the financial impacts of divorce. Wouldn't you rather have your kids and receive money from your former spouse than to not have your kids and have to send money every month? I can't believe women are still managing to complain about the court system that overwhelming decides with them. It's unbelievable, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 05:13 PM
4

10% of divorces involve alimony. 90% of divorces involving children end with custodial rights for women. 76% of those involve child support coming from the father to mother. I'm not sure if that answers your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 04:41 PM
5

97% of alimony is paid from men to women. Child support is about the same. The survey you are talking about was based on income levels after divorce. It did not consider income levels before marriage. Most women marry up, so it makes sense that men would have more income after the marriage because they were more than likely had better income before the marriage. So, that survey isn't a valid look at the financial impact of divorce. This overwhelming favors women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 04:15 PM
17

I'd say it's like rolling the dice, but it's actually worse, lol. Rolling a dice 1/6 = 16.6% Getting fired = 18%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:22 PM
8

What's wrong with putting the onus on women? Aren't they equally capable humans? "Why aren't more women trying either?" is a perfectly reasonable question to ask. The numbers you presented would look much more dire if you flipped the question to men. Men I know can count the number of times they've been approached on one hand IN THEIR LIFE, much less being able to count how much they've been approached in the last year. Maybe it's time for the ladies to grow some figurative balls and start appro…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:20 PM
1

I disagree. Women, relative to men, are not the ones actively pursuing relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 07:59 PM
5

Usually when women want a relationship they voice it. They aren’t keeping it secret. This is what I'm refuting
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 07:06 PM
6

Have you ever dated a woman? Half the time, they aren't even sure what they want themselves. Women end the majority of failed relationships when they realize it wasn't what they wanted. Men initiate the majority of them. Do you honestly believe women are the majority of the people who propose? Ask partners to move in? Ask people to move to the next stage? You're insane if you believe this. Women passively aggressively inquiring about the status of the relationship is not moving the relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:29 PM
11

It is because they want the best of both worlds. Women now are less feminine and just less attractive overall. That's fine news in their book and not an issue. They gloat about this social change. Meanwhile, men being understandably less masculine in response is terrible news for society. They'll completely absolve themselves from this social change and blame others. These people are allergic to taking responsibility for their own views and their impacts. They fought for a genderless world, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 06:13 PM
10

Yeah, as we all know, women are the ones who do most of the approaching. Men always expect women to do that. /s What fantasy world do you inhabit?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 04:45 PM
17

Crickets... Ironically, anyone who complains that men aren't being men anymore will say that out of one side of their mouth and then turn around and say that there no such thing as a woman and traditional gender roles are bad for women. People who think like this (or don't think) have infected academia, the corporate world through ESG, and politics. They are now in power and complaining about the changes THEY have made in the world. They have no clue what they actually want. These people are the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 04:11 PM
0

dissolvable by divorce with a legitimate reason* FTFY, that's what this whole post is about. No one here is saying divorce is bad in itself. It's the attitude that you should be able to dissolve a marriage because you don't feel like being married anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:11 PM
3

Yes, just wildly assuming that the vast majority of marriages pre-1980's were unhappy or absent a father is what I'm trying to find evidence for. There's none of it available.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:06 PM
3

Nope, I'm human. I'm on Reddit right now, which certainly isn't an obligation. I have the capability to be sad and happy. I don't flip out and overturn my life when I'm not happy like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 11:56 AM
7

Would love to a source on that. I'm not seeing anything, but pages like this showing a huge increase in single motherhood, especially mothers who are not married. https://ifstudies.org/blog/how-we-ended-up-with-40-percent-of-children-born-out-of-wedlock
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 11:54 AM
0

We are on American site with a user's from mostly American and Europe. Everyone knows we are talking about the form of marriage popular in the West. We don't need to muddy the waters by talking Islamic marriage or obscure marriage practices from Native American tribes. We're talking about the form of marriage that civilized Europe in many ways and the type of marriages that we are all familiar with. That is what Marriage 1.0 is referring to. Marriage 2.0 doesn't exist in Islamic countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 11:51 AM
2

Happiness is a temporary emotional state. I hate the fact that most of my generation thinks the meaning of life is "to be happy". People who are happy all the time are fools or on drugs. You can't be happy all the time. There will be moments in your marriage where you won't be happy. If you suddenly become not happy, a temporary emotional state, this is not a legitimate reason to break a commitment you made and ruin your partners life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 11:41 AM
1

$240 in 1970 is roughly equal to $1.9k in today's money. Most of what you said is irrelevant because you are not accounting for inflation. CoL vs. wages are almost exactly where they were in 1978. People simply saved money better and, quite frankly, worked harder. People started working at a younger age and worked longer hours. They didn't order Door Dash every other night either. Only 16 million people had cable in 1980, not everyone. Most people picked up the free antenna signal. And yes, we A…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:10 PM
-1

This idea that we need to consume luxury and give our kids the same level of consumption is what I'm talking about. You basically just admitted people would rather have a Netflix subscription and endless Amazon packages more than a child. This is a cultural problem, not an economic one. We have the resources for kids. We just don't want them. So were wages. Wages versus CoL had remained pretty much the same since the 1970's. People like to be all doom and gloom about the economy, but there wasn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 01:39 PM
1

But education standards are falling, though. You can give people a shitty, expensive education and call them educated, but that doesn't mean they are better off for it. People are certainly getting dumber nowadays. Wealth makes people selfish. People aren't more desperate for money nowadays than they were in the past. They are desperate to spend it on themselves. This is clearly a cultural trend, not economic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 01:13 PM
1

Actually, men are more active outside than women. You are just hanging around with losers. https://womensmediacenter.com/fbomb/women-dont-spend-as-much-time-as-men-outdoors-thats-a-problem#:~:text=Girls%20and%20women%20of%20all,correlates%20to%20reduced%20physical%20health.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 01:06 PM
–

The CDC source this article references DOES look at men and finds there's no significant relationship between premarital sex and divorce in men. I never said it was a perfect linear relationship. Not sure where you got that. I said women who are promiscuous are more likely to divorce, which you have conceded is true. I wouldn't categorize women with less than 10 partners as promiscuous. I'm not sure who you are arguing with as I never said only pursue virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 04:24 PM
–

Ok? Now, do women who sleep around.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:39 PM
–

Exactly, I presented facts. You presented an argument from authority. Let's stick to the facts. If you have facts contradicting mine, I'd be happy to hear them. or go to for the other team. Did not say everyone is inherently gay. What do mean by this? You can't just "go for the other team".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:34 PM
–

I can easily say Mediabiasfactcheck.org is itself biased. Let's stick to debating facts rather than arguments from authority. They also aren't saying you should be yourself if they are saying you should become gay to find love. That's actually the opposite of what OP was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:07 PM
–

If you are incapable or unwilling to learn how to love a feminine woman, then you should either date women who are more masculine than you are or realize your soulmate may not possess a vagina. Lol, are you suggesting men become gay if they can't attract a woman? You can't become gay. You are clearly born that way. That's a huge reason why the "gay is a choice" religious nuts got defeated. You can't control who or what you are attracted to. You seem to have a very warped idea of sexuality, femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 01:50 PM
46

We have a gay friend in our group. He is very extroverted and talks to everyone. One time, he struck up a friendly conversation with a girl at a restaurant, and she just said out of nowhere in the middle of their conversation, "sorry, I'm not interested in you." He laughed and said, "I'm not interested in you, either. " She was somehow offended by this and ended the conversation. Like, she just said the same exact thing to him unprompted, and now he's the asshole? I think some fraction of women …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 12:24 PM
12

You're not grasping the purpose of this experiment, in my opinion. OP's profile was pretty benign and generic. The control here is using the same exact profile across different cities. There's no variation between what he posted in the US to what he posted in Singapore. That's why he put what he did in his title. If you have xyz traits and listed what he put in his profile, you can expect similar results. He's not making claims about what attention other profiles would garner, only profiles with…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:47 AM
4

No, you can't conclude causation from experiments like this, only the effect. It's reasonable to assume that if you took a similar looking guy with similar education and background, you'd get similar results. You can't say if you changed xyz variables about a person, it would increase or decrease the amount of matches, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:11 AM
3

No one claimed they did. Are you claiming you know why they are swiping? One thing we do know is that more women swiped right more in one location than the other. There's more OLD prospects there for OP's description than the other. It's pretty conclusive in those terms. If you believe dating is a numbers game, that would lead you to believe that dating would be better there.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:00 AM
7

Sure, if you are not the things listed in OP's title, then this won't apply to you. But that's why he listed this in this title... For those it does pertain to, though, this is a pretty good experiment, and I've noticed this trend in my life traveling as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:54 AM
7

Can you elaborate? I've seen studies cited in this sub with an n≈200 that people go wild for. This experiment by OP was a sample of 5,000. What makes it invalid and unreliable other than the fact that you disagree with the results?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:49 AM
7

Yeah, it's a strange contradiction to hate straight men and blame them for all the ills of society while completely ignoring the overwhelming good they do on a daily basis. This post just comes off as bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:26 AM
10

I think it's a pretty valid experiment. The control was a pretty standard dating profile tested in different dating markets, which is your experiment variable. I assume you're not advising men to move countries simply to get more matches on dating apps Why not? If you are receiving six matches out of 1000 swipes in a city like LA, why wouldn't that be taken as a rejection from the women of LA? Do you expect him to just wallow and never attempt to meet someone elsewhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 09:04 AM
1

Define leaders
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:35 AM
1

As men you gotta take responsibility for the "world that you built". I disagree with this assumption that men built or continue to build the world solely for the purposes of men. I also don't believe women are the "vulnerable gender." Women dictate much of the purchasing and domestic decisions in society. The gender who consistently avoids taking responsibility for their actions are women. I'm sorry we listened to women, and now they are unhappy with their current situation. That's on women, tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 06:28 PM
1

What OP isn't realizing is that women used to not work, which had an effect on the labor market. There was roughly half the supply of labor, so companies had to pay enough to attract a man trying to support a family. Women fought for the right to enter the workforce, which is awesome for society but not so much for wages. Over time, this greatly expanded the workforce and allowed companies to pay less and less. This is one of the huge factors that contributed to stagnant wages from the 1970s onw…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 12:01 PM
3

I'm a man, but I completely agree with this, except towards relationships with women. A woman's only value to me is making me cum good. If they didn't make me cum good, why be around them at all? Obviously /s but I just wanted to write this out to show you how absurd this post sounds to normal people who don't think the opposite sex exists simply to make you orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 11:51 PM
–

Again, I'll cite the source that YOU provided. This is seriously one of the biggest head in the sand moments I've seen on Reddit. You won't even believe the sources YOU provided. It's literally the very first two paragraphs. The pandemic disrupted American life in many ways, but one trend remained the same: rising sexlessness. A growing share of younger Americans are living without sex. The new 2021 General Social Survey can be used to track these trends over time. As Figure 1 below shows, since…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:43 PM
–

I'm using your data which you linked to disprove what you said. Like I said, I can't really help you if you're not even going to at the data you are citing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:33 PM
–

You literally linked a plethora of data sources showing otherwise.This is the very first paragraph from what you cited. And I've already shown you how these small studies can be noisy and misleading. This study is trying to extrapolate a trend of roughly 50 million young Americans from 229 respondents. The pandemic disrupted American life in many ways, but one trend remained the same: rising sexlessness. A growing share of younger Americans are living without sex. The new 2021 General Social Sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:13 PM
9

I'm confused. Everything you linked shows a massive increase in sexlessness amongst younger people. You are pointing to a small decrease in recent years for men only, but meanwhile, the sexless rate is still triple what it was 30 years ago. Are you expecting a perfectly linear trend? Because real life statistics don't work like that. Signed, a data scientist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:47 PM
8

From the author on the original article: "We shouldn’t declare the sex recession over based on just a single year of data—especially a single year that relied on new survey methods—and a fairly small sub-sample of 229 respondents. ” Larger studies have shown that sexlessness is definitely on the rise amongst younger people. It's an alarming trend, and this very small sample you are citing is an outlier in the general trend. No one is adapting, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:32 PM
2

Men get dumped and rejected more statistically. That's why you hear more about it. Women also have a huge issue with rejection. It just doesn't happen as often. Plus, women who retaliate against men don't often get taken seriously. I had an ex key my car after seeing me out with my new gf. The police showed up and laughed, and simply called her the next day and told her not to contact me anymore. Men who retaliate often end up in prison (rightfully so), and we hear about it in the news. It reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:17 PM
5

It's funny you got triggered by me and not the person who generalized all men above. If you have trouble with people speaking in generalities, this sub is not for you. It's impossible to talk about dating without discussing larger trends. "Not all men or not all women" is simply a cop out. Of fucking course, not all people of a gender act in a particular way. Everyone here knows that. We've already moved past that assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:13 PM
5

Are you going to add anything to the conversation or just attempt dumb, junior high-level insults? Yes, I've spoken to women in reality. Maybe this sub isn't for you. I think r/teenagers is looking for more members. That might be more your level.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:02 PM
25

To be fair, sexlessness is on the rise, particularly among young men. That's not really a solvable problem in itself (we are not going to force people to have sex with sexless men), but more a symptom of the bigger issue going on. Less people are getting married, and people are less happy with their dating life compared to previous generations. Divorces are down, but adultery rates, particularly among women, are on the rise( 40% increase in the last 20 years ). 60% of young men are not in a rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 01:58 PM
14

That's not love, that's lust. You are infatuated with your idea of people, not the actual people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 01:25 PM
7

They want ownership. They want an ego boost. They want sex. They want status. Projection, these are literally all things women want and seek after. Women want ownership over men's resources, women seek attention and validation constantly, women are having just as much sex as men, and women go after men with status (not the other way around as you suggested). This is just a laughably false representation of what men actually want, presented by someone who has no idea what they are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 01:16 PM
10

Agreed, sex and love are the same thing for me. I think women separate this in their mind, particularly women who sleep around a lot. You see this in married couples when women start to use sex as a bargaining chip.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 01:07 PM
10

Porn wouldn't exist without women willingly entering the business. Female porn actresses and OF models make way more money than male actors. 60% of women also watch porn. And somehow men are the problem... This is like cigarette companies blaming the people they addicted to nicotine for giving everyone lung cancer. No, actually, women are, by in large, the ones making the porn and profitting off it willingly. Are people allergic to holding women accountable for anything they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 12:07 PM
2

Huh? What do you do when drinking alone at a bar waiting for friends to arrive? Or having a coffee in the morning? Or on the toilet? I usually Reddit in these breaks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 12:52 PM
6

I'm literally at a bar right now waiting for my friends. I'm also 32, not in my youth. Who are you arguing with? Lol 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 01:07 AM
6

First of all, straight and heterosexual mean the same thing. You don't have to say both. It's redundant. I honestly don't understand the rest of your comment. How does anything you said there relate to your post or my comment? Are you saying you only date the crazy women you are talking about? Are you the guy with no self-respect that you are talking about in your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 12:46 AM
19

And you think the women who stay in abusive relationships for years are better at picking up on red flags? People of both sexes ignore red flags all the time. It's not a man or woman thing. This post sounds like it was written by a teenager girl who wants a guy, but he is fucking their hotter, crazier friend. Major femcel vibes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 12:36 AM
1

There was a false statistic going around a few years ago that "1-in-4 college women have been sexually assaulted." It was even repeated by the president at one point. The catch? This was a self reported survey that included things like "unwanted attention" and "threatening looks." It's funny how stats get repeated, but not questioned, as long as they fit a certain narrative of fear. Honestly, why would the president or anyone send his two kids to college if they had a 1 in 4 chance of being sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 12:22 PM
18

Are you saying that a waitress and a chef couldn't afford an 8k/month, 3 bedroom apartment in Lower Manhattan? Gasp, I've been lied to for all these years.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:32 PM
33

Yeah, OP is acting like smokers or crackheads are desirable simply because they are skinny. That's not remotely true. No one wants skin and bones with rotten teeth either. The reality is long hair, nice nails, healthy skin, good teeth, and low body fat are all desirable to men because they are indicators of GOOD HEALTH. Years of evolution have conditioned both men and women to be attracted to these things, so yes, men are, in fact, attracted to health. It has nothing to do with fatphobia or what…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 04:10 PM
40

Why are you directing this at men? Women are just as shallow, if not more, when it comes to weight. We've known this for a while now. Non-overweight men are the pickiest with regards to weight, followed by overweight women Overweight men show the least weight preference in partners Overweight women universally prefer non-overweight men https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/122ozm3/weight_preferences_in_dating_most_comprehensive/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=andro…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:47 PM
39

I seriously appreciate your post, but women know this. They are just apathetic towards these men's plight. They don't have an incentive to care. When women have an issue, it's men's fault, and men have to fix it (see the WNBA). When men have an issue, it's also men's fault, and men have to fix it. Women's issues are societal problems, and men's issues are, well... not society's problem. Despite how far we've come in terms of giving lip service to gender equality, the old adage of the disposable …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 09:24 PM
–

That is mostly a case of criminals attacking other criminals. Lol, nice justification without any evidence provided. Now, do black on black violence. How do you justify that being ok? Are all black people criminals too in your mind? The bigotry and misandry that you can pull out of women on reddit is just hilarious to watch. See you later.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 05:09 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the rule is 1000 or 3000, not 100 or 300.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 12:34 PM
-1

Maybe English isn't your first language, but when native English speakers say "all the time", they don't literally mean it happens in every instance. It's short hand for saying "it happens often."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 08:50 PM
6

No cover for women at bars. Woman only events and clubs while men can't even have boy scouts anymore. Social safety net spaces for women while having none for men. The general public concern for women while men are disposable. There's so many that it would be ridiculous to list them all in a reddit comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 08:45 PM
2

but it applies to all of them He didn't say that anywhere in his post. You're making an assumption and that's why i accused you of bad faith. He's saying that women aren't recognizing this as a trend yet, because it's new. Men, however, have been experiencing this for years now, but women deny that a man can be a perfect partner and still get dumped for no apparent reason other than the woman "feels like it." He's pushing back against the "men are always at fault for a relationship failing" bull…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 08:15 PM
1

So your contention is that he is saying all women do this because it's a new phenomena? How does that make any sense to you? He is saying that it's an increasing, NEW thing. New does not mean ubiquitous. Try to have just a modicum of good faith when trying to discuss these things with people you disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 08:01 PM
1

Exactly? You said exactly what he anticipated people would counter with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 07:32 PM
6

That's a strawman. His point wasn't that it was all women. His point was that this is way more common than people think. 10k in a sub of mostly women is pretty significant figure for something that most women deny even exists. You even do the same cliche man bashing thing he claimed happens, which is victim blaming men for being boring and unexciting. That is not what that sub is. It's mostly people saying that their partner is perfect, they just inexplicably want to break up. It has nothing to …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 06:47 PM
-1

Men are more likely to be attacked in public by a stranger, so it's not like men are just waltzing around without a care in the world. We all deal with this fear regardless of gender. If you can't handle it, just don't go outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 04:20 PM
-2

catcalled by gay men That's usually the only experience most straight men have with catcalling. It's still awesome. Men don't have the hang-up women have where compliments are only good if you are attracted to the person. Most men don't get compliments from women often (or ever), so any attention is appreciated. Women are flooded with compliments , so they can be selective about which complements they like and which complements they consider "catcalling."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 04:10 PM
10

It's not insulting. It's just a ridiculous offer. Promiscuous women tend not to be able to maintain long-term relationships. It's completely rational not to want to be with women who have jumped from man to man in the past. I don't understand why women find this so offensive. Would you want to go out with a playboy who has sex with a different girl every night? Do you want to take a leap of faith that somehow you are going to be the one that changes their behavior? It's the same logic for easy w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 10:03 PM
2

It's always men who want younger, more easily influenced girls who are the loudest proponents. You completely ignore that older women date down, too. When women speak about this and make age gap relationships a gendered issue, it's blatantly a jealous outburst against men not selecting them over younger women. You say that you don't care what men are off the market and don't see women, including younger women, as competition. Why does it bother you that two consenting adults are in a relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 03:59 PM
7

You slipped a very important qualifier in there, "by age 30." Haha Again, remarrying someone 4 years after you were divorced is not an indication of infidelity during marriage. We're talking about who more often desires to leave a marriage and who is more likely to have a relationship waiting for them. That's women. And you don't differentiate between sexual infidelity and emotional infidelity. Yes, men self reported that they cheat slightly more across age groups (20% vs 13%, so not exactly as …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:10 PM
9

Not really, it's the only reasonable advice you can give to strangers online. So what's good advice in your eyes? Continue berating women into lowering their standards until they date you? I don't think that has ever worked before.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 08:26 PM
6

Studies don't show that, but feel free to link a study you think shows men leave for another woman more often than the revere. Remarriage is one thing, but not what anyone here is talking about. Age selection bias aside, that is not a good indicator of emotional infidelity DURING the marriage, which caused it to end. Leaving a relationship for another person you've developed a relationship with is certainly a woman trait. They are more likely to fall in love outside of a relationship. Men cheat …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 08:21 PM
10

It's just a tired as the "woe is me, why don't the [insert opposite sex here] around me change their behavior for my benefit" narrative. I don't assume they haven't tried, I assume that what they tried didn't work because they are still on this sub looking for answers. Everyone wants to improve themselves. It's harder for some than others, and some people just need to hear that they need to keep trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:45 PM
10

Quite simply, as a man, if you want to attract women - get gud +1. That's a concept that people in this sub really can't grasp, both men and women. Men want to try and argue themselves out of that difficulty. Women deny that it is indeed a little harder to be a man in the dating world. In reality, you just have to improve yourself to get better partners. This applies more to men, but also to women. No amount of logical discussions or arguing with the opposite sex will change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:25 PM
-1

So the man provides income, a house, sex (sexless marriage was a reason for divorce back then), is not a negligent parent (another reason back then), is not infertile, doesn't physically or verbally abuse you, doesn't cheat on you, and he doesn't love you? Do you think that actually happens that often? I think this may be the reason most modern women are initiating divorces so often nowadays. Once they feel the slightest hint of relationship trouble, they bounce and rescind the vows they made. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 07:14 PM
8

Yeah, Denmark is the only exception I found. But in the US, UK, Netherlands, Australia lesbians all have higher divorce rates. Even in countries close to Denmark like Sweden, that trend holds. I'm not sure what's going on there, maybe it's the way the Danes collect the data. Even in that data from Denmark, women are still initiating more of the divorces, though. A study of marriage dissolution rates in Sweden spanning the years 1995-2012 found that 30% of both male same-sex marriages and heteros…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:59 PM
5

That's not how it worked at all. It was different from state to state, but if you were able to prove unfaithfulness, that was enough, and that was the cause for most divorces back then. Women could also divorce if men who were not providing enough for the family. It was called a "negligent divorce". Women could divorce if the man was not living with the family (this was in Texas, not sure how many other states). Insanity, infertility, and sexual disfunction (I think this is code for sexless marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:51 PM
7

I disagree. People who don't want to get divorced don't just go down and file paperwork to get a divorce. And why are we just assuming men are the cause for the rise in divorce? I haven't seen any other than speculation in this thread on that side. There's no data to support that. What data we do have the data is from when you had to prove in court that your partner broke their vows. This is a good indication as you had to provide the reasons in court in order to get a divorce. Initiation rates …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:42 PM
11

This is actually not true. Lesbian marriages end more often than straight ones. Gay men have the most successful marriages by a small margin. Here are the rates observed in the Netherlands, for example. You can find this in other countries as well: Gay: 15% Straight: 18% Lesbian: 30% https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2016/13/lesbian-couples-likelier-to-break-up-than-male-couples
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:31 PM
5

It's hard to believe that claim when all the data we have indicates otherwise. Is there non-anecdotal evidence for this, or are we just guessing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:25 PM
5

Why are you making this assumption? Do you have any data on this? In the age of no fault divorces, you don't need a legal reason to divorce, so I'm sure there's no statistics on this. Back when you had to legally prove that your partner was being unfaithful or not fulfilling their vows (pre-1969), divorce initiation rates were roughly equal between men and women (and also much lower). Now that the divorce rate is much higher and women are initiating almost 70% of them, it indicates that modern w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:22 PM
6

Here's one from the Netherlands: https://nltimes.nl/2016/03/30/marriages-women-likely-end-divorce Here's one from the US and Canada: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01494929.2019.1630048 It's a pretty established trend that women are more likely to leave marriage, and subsequently, lesbian marriages end more often while gay marriages are the most successful in terms of divorce. Hetero sexual couples are in the middle, but they are ended by the woman more often than not. So I'm not su…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:04 PM
-1

More likely to break their vows or marriage promises is probably the better way to put it. It doesn't mean they cheated necessarily, but it does mean they didn't faithfully fulfill the promises made at the point of marriage to stick with and fix the relationship through trying times. For example, if the woman knows of a suitor waiting for them and initiated the divorce because of that, I would consider that unfaithful. Women are far more likely to monkey branch like this as they typically have m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:56 PM
3

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/lesbian-couples-twice-as-likely-as-gay-men-to-end-civil-partnership-as-divorces-up-by-20-8866454.html
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:46 PM
17

As someone who graduated with a master's in a STEM field, the last point hits home and troubles me. The reason women outperform men in education nowadays has to do with the intent of our education system. I'm not even talking about the built-in biases that the education has against men that everyone is aware of. It's the actual structure and stated purpose nowadays. During the end of getting my degree, there was this huge push to change our field, not on merit, but simply because not enough wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:36 PM
8

The word hypercompetitive is subjective, but yes, the dating scene is an objectively competitive place. I'm not sure what you find so offensive about telling people that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:07 PM
7

I think telling people the truth about their situation when they are looking for answers as to why something is not working is quite empathetic. Lying to people or, worse, completely dismissing people's experiences is not empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:01 PM
1

No you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 11:32 PM
1

No actually, this only goes one way. Men don't like people because of their education or earning potential. Men, for example, are much more likely to date people who make less money and have less education than them. That's a superficial and hypocritical view held by women who often chastise men for having preferences in women. That's kind of the whole point of this post. It's interesting seeing women trying to rationalize this, though. You guys have really bought the big "men are the superficia…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 02:44 PM
1

I think you missed the whole point of the post. I'm not saying men don't have options to enter trades or dangerous jobs to make money. I was trying to explain to OP why most men do jobs they don't like to make money. She thinks doing anything other than what you're passionate about to make money precludes you from pursuing a relationship with her. That's an extremely privileged and naive position to take. She's simply trying to rationalize why she finds lawyers and doctors more attractive than b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 02:25 PM
1

I never claimed men are randomly assigned jobs. Can you point to where I claimed that? What I actually said instead of the words you were trying to put in my mouth was that men don't have the luxury to risk their livelihood pursuing low paying jobs in order to having more fun at work. We take what pays us the best for our skills. Fun doesn't get to come into the calculation. It's hilarious how liberal women are about all other topics until it comes to workers' rights, especially when they involv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 02:17 PM
1

This is verbatim what you wrote, and this is what I'm responding to so you can quit accusing me of not reading what you wrote. I read what you wrote and it's largely nonsense. I think you know that as well. They don’t back themselves, they are not willing to risk things for their own happiness, and they give too much power to other people opinions. I've explained to you why men can't risk homelessness or jail to pursue happiness. Jobs provide security for men the same way men provide security fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 08:15 AM
1

You don't understand a man's plight. That's your biggest problem. Try putting yourself in others' shoes before you judge what people choose to do for a living. My point with the SAHP was that the vast majority of SAHP are women. This isn't a realistic possibility for men. There isn't the possibility of a woman (or anyone for that matter) coming in and swooping us off our feet and supporting us for who we are. There's also little to no social safety net for men compared to women. We are expected …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 07:29 AM
4

That's an extremely privileged way to view people's occupations. Most people, especially men who don't have the option of being someone's SAHM, don't have the luxury of "doing what they love for money." They are doing it to survive and put food in their mouths. Your whole post reeks of sheltered entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 06:38 AM
3

Same, they picked a weird age category, too. 25 to 44 is a huge gap in life stages. A single woman at age 25 is a completely different scenario than a 35 year old and not even remotely the same situation at 44.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:21 PM
2

Are you high? Do you think you need to be born with tool-shaped appendages in order to be predisposed to do something? Do you think all doctors all have stethoscopes around their necks when they're born? And you didn't answer my question about black people? What exactly do you think black people are genetically predisposed to be? Because it sounds like you think they are born to be slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 03:47 AM
–

there is a push to get women into trades especially where I am Exactly, they are clamoring for women, and they aren't going for these jobs. They offer great pay, but women prefer less demanding jobs, and then to complain they aren't paid as much. My point is that women aren't being kept out of these jobs. Women aren't choosing them. Again, that's on them, not society. Nurses are paid well. They are in demand and not underpaid whatsoever. They can make up to 100k where I live, and for a non-scala…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 12:14 AM
–

That's horseshit. They aren't simply arguing for a living wage. No one's trying to get women into plumbing or electrician work so they can meet ends meet. They are arguing for being paid more for doing less risky, less essential, less in-demand jobs. That's the whole fallacy of the wage gap. Women aren't actually working as hard as men of you look at hours worked and the risks men are taking to make money. If you get a degree and can't get a job after, that's on you. It's because your skills are…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 11:45 PM
1

What are you saying here? Are you saying black people are genetically predisposed to be slaves? Because they aren't... Women and men, however, are inclined to grow different parts because, you know, biology. I'm not sure if you are aware. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 09:14 PM
–

There's a whole sect of academia that believes this from a woman's perspective. If a woman is not making enough money (i.e. some individual is not giving them enough money for their work in their eyes) it must be a societal problem, not the individuals involved. Feminists don't believe in personal agency or responsibility for woman in that case, why should they for men in this case? If the majority of men in society aren't happy with their sex lives, how is this not a societal problem just like …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 08:55 PM
3

And you have to give credit to the men hiding behind a fake woman's profile. That's probably a good majority of them here, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 08:44 PM
-1

It's not really about hiding it or being displeased with being with you. I think everyone is uncomfortable with the idea of settling, but that's what we all have to do at some point in reality. You can't just hold out forever, hoping you score an absolutely perfect 10 who makes 10 figures a year. Life isn't some Disney love story. You have to find someone on your level, hope they like you back the same way, and then hope someone better doesn't come along that they like more. That's the ugly trut…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 04:00 PM
9

I'm not going to lie to you, most men settle with the people they are having sex with. They have sex with who they can, not with who they really want. Every man who has had sex with you or most average people has had the thought "yeah, I guess you'll do".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 03:49 PM
7

And crickets....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter