TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AfricanAnaconda Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by AfricanAnaconda on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Willingness/enthusiasm in proceeding with taboo sexual acts/behaviors. Frequency of sex, degree to which it is certain she is enjoying the sex/pursuing it not just to placate him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 07:06 PM
1

There are variations in the middle (ie. some 4s are 6's to some people), but there is a universality to those considered the most attractive. No woman would ever see a 5'9" man with a recessed jaw as nearly as attractive or lust inducing as Chris Hemsworth, no matter how contorted her preferences. Likewise, no man will ever genuinely prefer a 5/10 overweight woman to Margot Robbie. Most of the time when a "preference" for uglier partners manifests it's the result of a subconscious bargain, where…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:12 PM
3

You're a betabux if your girlfriend ever once displayed a greater degree of sexual permissiveness to a non-commited partner than she would ever for you. This is impossible to ascertain with any certainty as one can't know everything about a woman's past, but generally it would follow along any indication that she does not see you as a sex object, yet has or may for other men. She has categorized you as a resource provider, for whom sex is allowed on a purely transactional basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 06:06 PM
35

Manosphere-type forums, especially incel centric ones wouldn't be any fun to frequent for their users if they didn't act as a clarifying salve to the gaslighting/shaming/exclusion those men face on other sites/irl. If you check out the popularity of youtube channels pertaining to these topics, redpill focused ones with an emphasis on tactics to improve chances of getting laid, however fanciful, vastly outperform strictly blackpill/it's over type channels. Humans are naturally drawn to any possib…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 05:35 AM
3

Not surprising. More and more the effectiveness of the "online dating isn't real life" excuse dwindles. It's top 20% or nothing (for men) starting in 2021.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 05:26 AM
6

Sex is a small part of betabux LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 12:58 AM
6

Bigger is always better, in any dimorphic trait. Even if a woman hooked up with some guy endowed 0.5" above her comfort limit, she'd prefer to be with him than some guy 0.5" below that margin as She could adjust over time (vaginas are, by evolutionary necessity, very pliable) She'd procure far more social satisfaction bragging to her friends about fucking a guy with a big dick than a smaller one. Women do this all the time, and not for no reason. If size were solely a mechanical factor, I'd agre…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 12:56 AM
3

Firstly your average dude is not approaching chicks he doesn't fancy. They almost always limit themselves to some "type" or even worse crush 1 girl at a time. The average non-asexual dude sees 80% of women as potential sexual prospects. The only reason you think they're limiting themselves to a "type" is because that type isn't his personal preference, but rather the type of girls more likely to be receptive to his advances. Your naïve post assumes average guys have low n-counts just because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 12:51 AM
3

Women simply just know when a man isn’t the real deal and it disgusts and angers them on a visceral level; they can instinctively sniff it out as it has been biologically hardwired into them over countless millennia of evolution to select for the cream of the crop If you believe this then by your definition there's no way for average men to approach any girl anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 12:49 AM
5

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012245?via%3Dihub Physicality was held constant. Women rated the high DT character as significantly more attractive. Moreover, this greater attractiveness was not explained by correlated perceptions of Big 5 traits Even with everything else constant the correlation was directly influenced by the addition of dark triad traits to the characters, indicating it is solely the dark triad traits which cause the attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 05:14 AM
8

So you would condone attraction to a mass murderer because he's going all in for what he "believes" in?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 05:08 AM
1

replied to the wrong person
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 04:14 AM
1

Sorry I didn't read the whole paper. The abstract seems to imply "psychological nearness" as that person "being close to (or far from) the self" which I assumed means similar personality traits, bearing qualities that make one more reminiscent of one's own self.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 04:13 AM
7

Not seeing an argument there. Just because not every human woman on the planet is sending letters to Meeks doesn't invalidate the hypothesis that dark triad traits are a strategic advantage in sexual relations.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 04:11 AM
1

I do but I'm not sexually attracted to them. If I met them in real life I'd try my best to avoid them. I like the movies as depictions of their unique lifestyles more than I care for and relate to these characters.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 02:41 AM
1

yeah I agree with that, but again, I think dark triad fascination is more of a woman thing than a man thing, so the "HUMAN" point of equivocation is a bit naïve.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 02:31 AM
5

The point is, is that for majority of women the men they are attracted to are not all dark. I agree with this, however, I'm going after your contention in your title: RP is mistaken when they assert women fall for dark traid men. Those are not their only qualities and sometimes are overlooked due to being HUMAN not a woman. Which I do not agree with. Studies have shown women go for men because of their dark triad traits, not despite them, a phenomenon unique to hetero/bisexual women seeking men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 02:23 AM
9

You wouldn't know because how often are you in the situation in the real world? Look at the leaders of every other 3rd world nation. Look at Putin, he's fetishized despite likely being a mass murderer (via the will of his state). This, I'll admit, isn't a woman only problem. All humans fetishize traits that in practice belong to people more likely to jump-start humanity's downfall. Human beings are inherently selfish and sympathize with the pursuits of unapologetically selfish people. The issue …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 02:12 AM
1

Six studies revealed that when evaluating psychologically distant targets, men showed greater attraction toward women who displayed more (vs. less) intelligence than themselves. In contrast, when targets were psychologically near, men showed less attraction toward women who outsmarted them. All this paper reveals is that men are less attracted to psychologically similar, more intelligent women, yet when those women are less psychologically similar to the queried men, they find them more attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 02:00 AM
1

The men she "vibes with" well are likely just the men among those she fucked actually willing to date her and offer a degree of mutual exclusivity. No man who has elapsed into "hookup material" would willingly settle before having his share of lays, likewise, no woman could get into a LTR with the highest value of her hookups. If you looked closely at those pairings you'd notice this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 01:55 AM
31

You are trying to equate fetishization of demonstrably abhorrent and anti-social traits with recognizing the "humanity" in others. Do you think that the women who fell for Richard Ramirez, Jeremy Meeks, or Ted Bundy were just after their "glimmer of humanity"? Would it not be more defensible for them to have noticed the glimmer of humanity in the very normal men they've grown up with with normal flaws that didn't lead to mass homicide? There is no virtue to being attracted to an anti-hero in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 01:51 AM
1

Women can't even understand each other, much less understand themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 01:40 AM
63

Past success breeds entitlement, a phenomenon clear as day in any young attractive woman. Rejected by a potential partner, an ugly man is not driven out of sorts, he expects it, but an attractive man will feel his superiority is threatened by that rejection, and will be more likely to seek a sort of vengeance to make up for his bruised ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 01:39 AM
1

Because they, being Hollywood celebrities, are 10/10s in the valley of 10/10s. Of course those you pointed out comprise the top of their fields, but their issues arise in eloping with similarly high-status rich attractive celebrity women, who, understanding their relative value among billionaire sugar daddies and millions of thirsty fans, tire even of these attractive millionaires.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 01:35 AM
6

For posterity the the person who I was talking to in this comment chain has an only fans and posts lewd photos of herself on her account. Not at all a coincidence that she resorts to petty anti-male shaming tactics. Just something to notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 09:09 PM
6

Please respond honestly and don't use ad hominems unless you really have nothing intelligent to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:42 PM
2

Culture of course has an effect but people need to realize more how often culture is just the extrapolation of our innate biological predispositions. There are people who argue that taller men are more prized solely because of cultural influence, and ignore the fact that women have an innate preference for taller, larger men. Likewise, women have a natural tendency to recognize value in rich men based on evolutionary instincts, and thus our culture has manifested this preference in turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:26 PM
3

That certainly would be possible but men by and large would never universally opt out of dating down. The reason why women can date up but men can't is because men will expend a large share of their resources to aquire pussy. Men have much less discriminating sex drives, and also men do not find more powerful/succesful women significantly more attractive than poor women. A successful man would be willing to marry a woman with a thick ass, narrow waist, and pretty face but no money, but a succesf…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:24 PM
3

And why do you think they're insecure? What possibly could make men so routinely insecure about what is effectively just a piece of spongy tissue?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:20 PM
1

I don't know about you or most people but I get the impression, based on human behavior and the libido, that most of men's productivity is based on the prospect of finding a mate. The prospect of aging out of the dating market alone isnt anything that a reasonable man with a non-zero sex drive is going to accept and decide to pursue "career success" or whatever that is worth to him. As you pointed out, Japan has other problems, esp work culture, a condition which could be ameliorated by these ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:18 PM
9

Ok but women still use small dicks as a go-to insult, more so than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:16 AM
8

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/what-women-want according to this women proportionally watch big dick porn more than men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:48 AM
1

they haven't collapsed yet. They're on their way. Also doubling is bad, when you look at the numbers, it's 30 million sexless men to 60 million, 30 million excess men with no future and no positive outlook, susceptible to radicalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 05:44 AM
4

Take your blue-pilled mind out behind the barn and kill it, Of Mice and Men style. It has no place in 2020, there is No Country for Simp Men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 04:23 AM
15

There's nothing stopping women from not mercilessly insulting short men, and yet they do it still. The most body-positive place on the planet is the categories section on pornhub. Men celebrate BBWs, tiny women, tall women, all races, ethnicities, shapes, sizes, etc. Edit: it's impossible to find small dick porn that's not small penis humiliation. Imagine if the majority of BBW porn was fat women humiliation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 04:22 AM
1

It's not the end of the fucking world, I agree, but it's not the ideal map for our future society. Human sexuality, unchained, leads to far more harm than good, and we're seeing the outcomes in places like Japan. One distinction may be most societies usually had a dearth of breeding-age men due to war, so now with an abundance of men there is no clear path forward to address their unfulfilled sexual desires beyond porn and the eventual prospect of sex-bots.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 04:18 AM
3

It's not about society obsessing over sex, it's that this subset of people that don't have sex used to be confined to the very rare subset of those in total abject squalor, the critically disabled, and the clergy. Nowadays 30-40% of young men are incels despite being on the surface rank and file members of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:31 AM
1

That woman you linked is not objectively pretty so it doesn't support your point. Also the "looksmatch" theory is fairy accurate for long-term relationships, that's why people always say "she/he's out of your league", and if you go outside you'll notice most couples are of a fairly similar looks level. Also on your last point, incels couldn't in a million years compete with the unabashed adoration that women heap onto attractive men. Men see how top-tier alphas are worshipped and aspire to that …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:28 AM
2

trisha paytus she doesn't even look remotely ok with makeup, 2/10 at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:21 AM
3

That's why Japanese women fuck white tourists in droves, they don't want betas raised on incest hentai.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:20 AM
4

There are only 2 ways to succeed in online dating as an average guy Spend hundreds of hours through repeated failures and cherish the rare glimpses of success if they come Un-average yourself 1 I'm sure most people are familiar with if they've gotten to the point of asking for feedback online so I imagine 2 would be more productive at this point. The fundamental issue in online dating is women are granted 1000s of choices for free, so they naturally, without even hesitant consideration, won't co…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:18 AM
16

Social media and modern dating has given a lot of women incentives to be depressed or lonely. i’m definitely in that category. Maybe we suffer in silence so it’s not talked about enough. Women have to see instagram models get social attention and financial gain just from being beautiful everyday online. Even on political twitter,seeing girls get tons of interaction for milquetoast takes because they’re well endowed is a bit of an esteem hit. Seeing boys and men believe that unrealistic standards…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:11 AM
1

Miles Teller and Amy Poehler
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:05 AM
2

Seth Rogan is a looksminned 6.5 while Amy Schumer is a looksminned 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:04 AM
1

It "deals" with it by shaming them and pretending that it doesn't exist. Placating them with porn and the "privilege'" to pay for nude pics of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:02 AM
1

Men: Looks, status, and natural ability to sociopathically manipulate the female psyche Women: There really is no point in comparing women's capacity to get casual sex, it'd be like comparing ducks on their ability to float. If you're a woman casual sex is available to you 100% of the time to all men at within 3 points of your looks level.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 02:00 AM
10

Also extremely attractive yet finds no other women attractive and has no means/motive to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 01:57 AM
0

Most women live in the twilight zone of self-perception regarding their capacity to secure the exclusive, resource-laden commitment of a high-value male. Most women could easily find some chiseled, tall sports star to bang for the night, but always in the back of her head she fears the true distinction between her and his relationship market value, which is whether if she asked him to stop seeing other women and devote himself to her in a romantic, emotional sense, whether he would be likely to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 01:56 AM
1

Because sex is much more enjoyable than anything else I do. Also the psycho-social benefits that surround being a successful partner (women fawning over you, looking at you in a reverential way, being high in the social totem pole) all derive from our biological characterization of sexual success. Drawing from that, there's a clear status-based association between easy access to casual sex and high-value. The men I've known unable to attain sex on their terms were usually ugly, short, and denigr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 01:49 AM
44

Men by and large aren't "intimidated' by successful women. If the average middle class joe could bed a 200k/year lawyer woman as easily as the same could happen with the opposite genders, he would 99% of the time. The issue is women will, in a financial sense, almost never date down. There are numerous exceptions but the vast majority of women won't even consider a man who makes less than her. This issue has been construed into men being afraid of successful women but the reality is it's success…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 01:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter