TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Agile_Potato9088 Archive

View 0 posts and 130 comments by Agile_Potato9088 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-11

FFS. Mods, WTF are you not removing these posts? Anti-war BS has nothing to do with Men's Rights. This is the last straw, I am leaving. This group has gone down-hill and deserves to be removed.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:31 PM
0

Because it's not fucking relevant! Stop it with these anti-war posts! MODS! Delete ALL anti-war posts! They are NOT relevant!
/r/MensRights14/06/24 09:20 PM
-10

It's also a matter of mindset and opinion. While some here may technically be voluntarily celibate, they can still be classed as incel by having a similar or the same mindset. One such comment exists in this thread.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 09:18 PM
-32

Mods. Remove all anti-war posts. They have nothing to do with Men's Rights. Their intent is to just spew anti-war propaganda.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 01:40 PM
-2

Because it's not fucking relevant to Men's Rights! Stop trying to bring outside politics here! Mods, please delete all current and future posts about any sort of war or political turmoil.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:32 AM
0

Why TF am I seeing so many anti-war posts on here? This has nothing to do with Men's Rights, FFS! Mods, please delete all current and future posts talking about war. It is not relevant to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:25 AM
1

This has nothing to do with Men's Rights. This was only as a result of those men being classed as "military fit", of a certain age and general fitness. They were classed as combatants. Mods, delete this. This anti-war BS is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:12 AM
1

Stop with this anti-war BS. War is necessary so people like putz don't walk all over people like you who don't want to defend yourself or anyone else. If those arseholes don't fight, putz will win. You do not want that.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:02 AM
2

Prenuptials and BFA's are not relevant in Australia as they are not actually binding, a court can dismiss them for any reason or no reason at all and make their own ruling.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 10:57 AM
1

That law is only relevant if you are living with your partner. Easy fix; don't live with your partner.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 10:55 AM
0

suitable candidate There's your problem. Women are people, not candidates. "Potential partner" is the right terminology, "candidate" is clinical and degrading.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 10:52 AM
3

In this specific case using female as an adjective is correct, the daughters are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 10:46 AM
0

So, if someone has said or proven that they don't care about your feelings, why try to make them? Why brood over it? Just remove that person from your life, stop caring about them in turn and start caring about yourself. Everyone keeps saying "They don't care about me.". And? They're not obligated to, neither are you - them. So, why waste time with this? Deal with it and move on. Don't give them any attention or thought. If you want someone to care about you, seek them out. If you find more arse…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 10:13 AM
2

That "genocide" was started by hamas, on the behalf-of or at least linked to palestinians. Their stated goal was the genocide of all jewish people, as their founding document and their religious documents clearly state. Don't hide behind "genocide" or "inhuman" as shields. islam, muslims and palestinians do not view you as human or worthy, they have said and proved this time again. Get your head out of the sand and stop defending them. War is needed. War is always going to be needed. Because som…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:14 AM
1

How many women of sound mind have you met that have admitted they need self-improvement, without blaming others at any step of the way?
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:07 AM
1

Yep, I would bet decent money that this is going to be covered up as quickly as possible because it doesn't align with their anti-men agenda. "A woman at fault!? This can't happen!".
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:37 AM
1

Yep. Lost respect for a woman close to me because she never admits when she's wrong, she still hasn't apologized and she just runs off in a huff when she can't prove me wrong. That respect will never come back.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:28 AM
1

Yes, we get the intent. What we're saying is that the analogy is poor as the Dog is not usually a danger to anyone. Choosing a different animal such as a wolf would have been better.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:26 AM
1

Never apologize for being pedantic, people should strive to be correct and their failure to do so should always be pointed out.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:22 AM
-1

Castration has nothing to do with cutting a man's penis off, a quick google search would tell you that.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:33 AM
0

Again, castration has nothing to do with cutting a man's penis off. Google it next time.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:31 AM
-7

Castration severs and blocks the tubes that carry sperm, nothing is done to their penis. Google it next time.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:30 AM
3

No, that is not a simple question and there is no simple answer. While most men are not murderers or rapists and would not use that situation to enact any unsavory plans, that particular situation has nuance such as "Why TF are they there in the first place?". People should not find themselves in the middle of a foreign forest for no logical reason, it doesn't happen. The situation is just not realistic and as such deserves no attention. The only conclusion I can come to from that question is th…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:18 AM
0

America only has freedom because there are many people who are willing to fight to defend that freedom from others who want to take it away from them. If you are not prepared to defend yourself and everything you hold dear then you are pathetic and deserve to be walked all over.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:18 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:11 PM
-4

If someone is lonely they should seek company. It's not rocket surgery. Wtf.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:10 PM
2

It's stupid of anyone, man or woman, to expect someone else to pursue them. If you like someone, speak up, tell them, ask them on a date. It's not a hard concept.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 01:01 AM
4

Yet again morons seem to be ignorant to what Feminism was trying to accomplish. It's not about being a "girl boss", "hyper-independent bullshit", or what your particular feelings are. It was only ever about giving women the option to vote, drive, work, chase a career, among other things that men could do. It's only about rights, not wants. How the fuck do they not get that it's all optional? They don't have to work 14-hour days "without no man". They can still be independent and date, it's not h…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 12:58 AM
6

1:48 - I take issue with this. This takes the responsibility away from the individual to monitor their own behaviour. Everyone should be taught to not be an antagonistic and to not use violence unless appropriate, not just men. Regardless of who you are, if you intentionally antagonize someone or use violence against them they may retaliate and you may deserve it. Yes, deplorable behaviour may deserve a violent response, what a new idea. Take responsibility for your actions, end of discussion. 7…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 12:02 PM
2

Extremely disappointing, she should have been sentenced to years in prison not months in jail.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:59 AM
4

Because reporters are scum and using women to push an agenda and gain views.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:48 AM
20

It's not. But given the right judge, that can be ignored and often is.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:25 AM
1

Non-equivalency. Acting is inherently subjective. Train driving is not. Sure, some people could be more effective than others, better with hand-eye coordination or something. But they are the exception, not the rule. The rule is "this is how you drive a train". No such rules exist for acting.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:10 AM
1

Pretty obvious answer. Some men may feel uncomfortable talking about gay sex because they're not gay, the same could be said in reverse. No, they are not owed any deference for talking about their personal things. But, neither are you. If you have a problem with a particular man, go talk directly to them and say so. We can't read minds. Addendum: Nobody has a right to talk about personal things at the expense of the recipient's choice.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:16 AM
1

Tell him to say absolutely nothing to the police. Absolutely nothing. Tell him to go speak to a lawyer and give the lawyer a copy of that evidence. Do nothing else.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:03 AM
1

All Men have 100% leverage in their own decision to engage in relationships with women. Just don't engage. Simple.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:01 AM
1

So, what do you propose is changed world-wide that will have any impact? How many campaigns do you currently have going to enact those changes? Don't come here and complain nobody is doing anything when you aren't, either. This group is here for us to vent, talk through things and share relevant articles. You know, one of the places for Men that are becoming ever-more scarce.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:27 AM
1

Why TF do I keep seeing these anti-Ukrainian posts!? What TF is wrong with you that you encourage Ukranians to not fight for their own country!? Have you no sense of shame!? Despicable filth!
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:20 AM
1

Despicable. Not prepared to defend their own country. Filth.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:13 AM
1

Ah, there it is. "god-believing". No sympathy from me just for that bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:10 AM
1

If they did not turn up for mandatory service, since their country is currently at war, then they have no rights to consular services; they abandoned their country.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:04 AM
1

Household labour cannot be taken into account as it is the duty of all house-hold members, not just women.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:59 AM
1

Their definition of "egalitarian" is fundamentally incorrect as it fails to take agency, expertise, industry and many other variables into account. Much like the proponents of the "gender pay gap". Egalitarianism by definition is based upon merit and equal-opportunity, equality does not and cannot exist.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:58 AM
1

This is most likely just a pervert roleplaying.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:52 AM
1

Why TF do you talk to an "AI character"?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:45 AM
1

Little bit different. MR's are there as much to protect the individual as the system. feminist ideologies offer no such protection to Men.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:40 AM
1

Because nobody cares how we feel if it doesn't suit their agenda.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:38 AM
1

Some of us are stuck, and what other country do you have in mind that is un-touched by stupidity?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:29 AM
1

"Arrest all Men!" would be their response to that question.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:26 AM
2

It's not "for free" when the cost is our freedoms and individuality.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:24 AM
1

jordan peterson is a religious apologist and a moron. Do not ever read anything he has a hand in.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:51 AM
1

No. Neither would have happened if you kept it in your pants. You made a conscious decision to have sex with both women. Entirely your decision.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:50 AM
1

There is nothing you can say to any doctor to convince them to let you get a vasectomy at the age of 21 with no relevant medical ailments or other complications. They would be risking their medical license and freedom to give you a vasectomy as the procedure is not considered cosmetic like the other kind of snip, it's a big decision.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:49 AM
6

Believability is not remotely scientifically valid, a claim is always false unless objective evidence is provided. Personal testimony cannot under any circumstance be provided as objective evidence in a scientific study.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:42 AM
3

Endometriosis is often dismissed by doctors because effective treatments are often on an individual basis, figuring out such treatments is often outside of their wheelhouse, and lawsuits as a result of mistreatment are common enough to dissuade them. Doctors are often lazy, though. My Sister has experienced this first-hand, sexism had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:38 AM
1

Nope. The onus is on her to prove her claims. If she cannot prove them, she has falsely accused him and should be punished.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:19 PM
1

Okay, cool. Now charge her with a false accusation, put her in prison, force her to pay him a huge fine, and force her to publicly apologize.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:17 PM
4

False accusations and sexism are the main reasons.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:08 PM
4

I would rather meet a robber. At least the robber is honest about wanting to take away my rights.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:40 PM
8

A "life of being conditioned" does not take away your obligation to be logical, reasonable and rational.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:39 PM
1

Yep. Australia has been going downhill for quite a long time. Soon enough it's going to be illegal to simply be male. If their intention is to stop men wanting anything to do with women, they've succeeded.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:30 PM
7

Do you not know the definition of "merit"? It's a very objective definition, as objective as you can get.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:17 PM
2

The Law not protecting us from and punishing wrongful accusations. Social media demonizing us even if found not guilty. Media bias against us. Law courts almost automatically rule in favour of Women in most disputes. Heavily judged and punished for defending ourselves against Women, even in potentially-deadly situations. There are many.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:33 AM
-17

It's not talked about because talking about it would require proof.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 01:37 AM
-5

No, it doesn't. Feminism is the advocation of women's rights and the legal protections thereof. It has nothing to do with bringing men down or giving women a disproportionate amount of power. Just like men's rights has nothing to do with bringing women down or giving us men more rights. These are very clear definitions, one of which is even in the top right of this group. MODS!: Have a very deep dive into this group and the amount of people spreading "incel" ideals. This is not acceptable, and i…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 01:13 AM
-2

using the word “iNcEL,” belittling This depends on the language used. If the shoe fits. "nerdy beta types" fits here. feminist “cause” This depends on what their "cause" is. Feminism is an advocacy for women's rights, it has nothing to do with men. It also has nothing to do with egalitarianism, which is what most people think feminism is. So, their cause would have to directly advocate for an inequality that women have, which I have yet to see outside of western society. Quite honestly, there ha…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 12:27 AM
1

Yes. This group has become increasingly creepy with incel speech and then that "prime" rubbish. If it goes on I might have to report the group for it.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 12:09 AM
1

Females in their prime are inadequate as a rule. Careful. That comes close to incel speech. That's not welcome here. You do not owe and are not owed automatic acknowledgement or niceties. It's completely up to you and others who you or they talk to.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 12:04 AM
2

Until society and the law treat Men with respect and afford us equal rights and opportunities alongside Women, never.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 11:59 PM
1

Whoosh
/r/MensRights06/04/24 11:47 PM
1

Religion has offered nothing positive to humanity and deserves to be annihilated along with anyone who follows them.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:44 AM
2

LOL! They put "no equality" and "working women" in the same sentence and can't see the irony. Figures.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:57 AM
1

Incorrect. Feminism is only about gaining and protecting Women's Rights e.g. voting, working, driving, military service, etc. That's why Feminism is the name. "Equality" or more apt, Equal Opportunity, is a part of Egalitarianism. Both Men's Rights and Women's Rights movements have nothing to do with each other, they only seek to further themselves. Only Egalitarianism seeks to work together for the benefit of both with Equal Opportunity as it's methodology. While most people recognize that ther…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:49 AM
-10

No. There is no male loneliness epidemic. Some individual men are lonely, and it is entirely in their hands to solve. If you are lonely, seek socialization. You eat when you are hungry. You sleep when you are tired. Seek socialization when you are lonely. It's not a difficult concept to grasp. There are some who are socially inept, such as those with asperger's or anxiety, fair enough. But there are many, many support groups for them both online and in person. There is no excuse for not utilizin…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:09 PM
3

Don't refer to them as "white knights", that affords them a legitimacy they don't deserve. Call them what they are "Sad Horny Sycophants".
/r/MensRights07/03/24 05:25 AM
2

I would sigh, call them a moron, and leave.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:18 AM
2

The main problem I have with this is the lack of punishment for false accusations. I think the accuser should serve a minimum of 25 years for falsely accusing.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 11:22 AM
1

Hostility to anyone will never stop. Some people just do not get along. But, that's okay. Nobody is obligated to like you or anyone else. The only thing us Men can do is look out for our own interests and support one another, in spite of their sexist bullshit and hatred. If their Feminism is so positive, soon enough they will work themselves out, by themselves. Leftist man haters are the minority in real life. They are also in control of the governments globally. This was a successful planned ta…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 11:13 AM
9

Good. Continue.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:55 AM
2

Yep. I am happily single and have no intention of dating in the foreseeable future. Women have a great many problems at the moment which can only be solved with time. Until that happens I want nothing to do with them, they can sort their own camp out, first.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:32 AM
2

The idea behind this stems from the reproductive cycle. The older you are, the less fertile you become. So, the younger generations tended to stick closer to their own in order to more readily "guarantee" fertility. Other than that it's an entirely social "But, she's still a 'kid" kind of thing. TBH, it doesn't make any sense no matter the age difference. If 18 is the legal age for being an adult, then they're an adult and their decision shall be respected, no exception/s. Btw, if you put a limi…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:10 AM
-1

While there is a lot of stupidity and sexism in such cases, everybody should have a go bag, and the Man is an arsehole for wanting to leave for that reason alone. If there is no trust in the relationship, fair enough. But everybody should have a go bag, at least a large medkit with 2 emergency blankets, 2 tourniquets and at least $1000 cash in large and small bills. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:33 AM
-5

Feminism was a great ideology, it afforded Women a great many freedoms and rights that they didn't previously have. Eventually they ran out of things to campaign for as their freedoms and rights were gained. Now, they are more like a quasi-egalitarian group. But, quite a few of their splinter groups are founded upon hatred of Men or a sort of Female supremacy. Egalitarianism is a failed ideology, if it wasn't we'd all be moving towards it, not hatred of one another.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 07:56 PM
-9

The "red pill" bullshit is just that; bullshit. Early human development had a use for that concept, it's the precursor to a conscious group. But, we don't need it anymore. We haven't had a use for it for a very long time. Contemporary "alpha" or "sigma" bullshit is just a masturbatory fantasy, nothing more. Anyone who subscribes to that bullshit deserves to be ridiculed.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:45 PM
0

Protection and Social Standing: Because the mechanics of Evolution dictated this behaviour as necessary for the survival of our species. Over time, as our technologies and knowledge progressed these concepts changed just as much. Look at us now. We still use these concepts, just in many different ways. Fluidity is not specific to either Sex or Gender, it's entirely individual. In saying this, please refrain from generalizing Men and Women down to "game-theory logic", "Women don’t get aroused by …
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:03 PM
4

I'm sure not everyone here approves of me being here It wouldn't matter if someone didn't. This space is for anyone who advocates for or even just acknowledges Men's Rights. You are very welcome here. Actually pretty cool to see this perspective, honestly. Because, I've heard of this but never first-hand. Group-think like that really does nothing but hurt whatever cause it touches, and it's honestly refreshing to see how such a seemingly cohesive group can fall so easily to the bad ideals we see…
/r/MensRights04/02/24 10:59 AM
38

"this would explain why i've been faking orgasms the entire time we've been together." Lol, they always say this. It's just ridiculous at this point. Nobody owes them head, not even sex. I don't get the idea behind this, either. If they've been faking orgasms this just makes me doubt their word, it's not insulting. Let's say the OP was even true. There is an extremely easy fix for this: Take a fucking shower. How hard is it to just take a shower before sex? You can even both take one. Whoa, who …
/r/MensRights04/02/24 10:32 AM
1

Because Women have literal centuries of history as being the "weaker" Sex. They are still seen that way and they fully take advantage of that. It's not likely to change any time soon, either.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:56 AM
16

That's one major thing I hate about the "justice" system. Time served is a fucking disgrace. You haven't served any time till you begin your sentence in prison. You also haven't served your time if you don't serve the entire sentence. I'm sick of criminals being sentenced to 20 and getting out in 12. There is no such thing as "good behaviour" in prison, that's the fucking minimum they should be forced to do. FFS.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:40 PM
-5

(Plz Ignore my grammar mistakes) No, use proper grammar.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 09:56 AM
0

What a comically pessimistic wish, haha! I hope she finds the little bread tag with the used-by date on it, in turn.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 08:51 AM
6

Feminism was "originally" meant to give Women rights that they did not have such as voting, working, driving, education and others; at least in the West. It then slowly turned more towards egalitarianism. But, it should still be focused on Women's issues, that's the entire point of the movement. Egalitarianism should be praised itself, not attributed to a different group half-arsedly.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 08:50 AM
20

I realize that there is not much that I can legally do. So I distance myself from all sexist Women as much as possible and make it very well know to them how much I despise them and their views and behaviour. Although not all Women are like that.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:51 PM
1

Here's 10 right off the bat: Punching someone and expecting no retaliation. Expecting their partner to automatically financially carry them. Expecting to win every argument, while relying on emotion and devoid of logic. Expecting the same pay as peers, regardless of hours worked, experience, negotiation, etc. Expecting praise for doing the bare minimum to survive: work, cook, clean, fix things, pay bills, etc. Expecting to immediately be believed when accusing someone of assault. Expecting to ne…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:51 PM
1

I'm politically in the middle, a Moderate, because both sides have some great ideas, but both sides have some monumentally stupid ideas. I'm in favour of keeping politics Moderate and taking both sides into consideration for the benefit of both sides, not just one. But, I doubt that will ever happen. So, no. Until that happens, I don't want to work with either side. It's the same with Men's and Women's Rights, I highly doubt both sides can come together to compromise for the benefit of both with…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:40 AM
1

"We want to work! Hang on, fuck that, that's too hard! We want to stay home! But we want all the money!" - Feminists, probably.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:01 AM
1

LOL! All they are doing is perpetuating the stupid stereotype of the "housewife". It's up to every adult to clean up their own messes and to help clean up someone else's mess if asked. It's not some "mystical ritual passed through the ages". Just spray it and wipe it. Simple.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:12 AM
4

If you cannot fathom why change does not happen quickly and isn't happening now, especially considering the amount of setbacks we've had in recent years, you will never understand Men's Rights. There is no one singular problem, there are many. They cannot be fixed overnight, they may not be fixed in 5 years. Change takes time. What have you done to campaign? What solutions have you fielded? How have you contributed? What Laws have you legislated? What seat do you hold in local government? How of…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:31 AM
8

MensRights as a Reddit group is dedicated to talking about and talking through problems that Men face. Whether we accomplish anything within the Law or Legislation is secondary. Especially since we face a lot of stigma even trying to point out problems and injustices. - In this we have done quite well. The fact that you can come here and complain and we can refute you says as much. What is a "law of value"? If you mean "make a change", a lot of Men come here to vent, that is a large part of why …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:55 AM
1

So, those feminists want to circumcise unwilling, non-consenting babies? That doesn't sound like activism or feminism, that sounds like misandry and genital mutilation of a minor. I think it's very telling that they hate Men so much they're willing to mutilate a literal baby to feel good about themselves.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 03:11 AM
1

On the surface, anyone can seem fake. You have to look deeper than just their words. Do they have a history of enlightening Men's issues? Do they actively advocate for Men's spaces? Do they correct fellow Women when they make stupid assumptions or sexist remarks? Do they treat Men as individuals, or do they assume and generalize? At the bottom line, if all you do is listen to what people say to make judgement calls about them, all you're doing is taking them on their word. As we all know, words …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 12:37 AM
4

Sea shells and sticks were Pop at some point. Classical orchestral music was Pop at some point. Polka was Pop at some point. Rock was Pop at some point. Pop music is not a singular genre but a representation of the time in which it lives. Contemporary Pop as of 2024 could be considered electronic rap. But, go back to 1974 and you will find a very different type of popular music. People who judge others for their taste in music 100% deserve to get shit on for it.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:45 AM
1

Pop just means Popular Music. Rock was Pop at some point. Times change and so does Pop. That's why it's so hard to classify Pop as one singular genre.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:38 AM
1

"One likes to believe in the freedom of music. But glittering prizes and endless compromises shatter the illusion of integrity, yeah." - Rush - The Spirit of Radio Money, essentially.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:35 AM
1

I interact with Women when needed. I never let myself be in a room alone with a Woman-stranger. I don't date, nor do I seek friendship with Women. I cope by knowing my very limited rights and I do not take any chances regarding them. As for "incel". Stop using that stupid word. It's an insult hurled at Men to take away our freedom of choice and insinuate that we are not worthy to date. It's old and tired. Let it die.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:21 PM
1

Because Contemporary Feminism does nothing to empower Women, it seeks to take away the Rights of Men. That's their end-goal, no Rights for Men.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:15 PM
2

Growing older is mandatory. "Growing up" is optional. "Growing up" is also subjective and a pretty stupid idea. "Growing up" as an idea, for me, is entirely intellectual and has nothing to do with material things. Whereas, I've seen it described as the opposite for most other people. Why? Because of the stupid old idea of the Man as the Provider. The provider of material things. The walking, talking wallet.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:02 PM
1

We don't need you. We choose to have you in our lives. We can easily choose not to. I've made my choice.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:52 PM
1

LOL! They sure do love their buzzwords. "A young Black Muslim single mother...". Right, she was muslim, yet she was out drinking and very clearly intoxicated. Yeah, that adds up.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:39 PM
6

"Alleged attacker". There is no evidence I know of that proves he did anything, yet she still got a massive payout, did not have to answer for potentially lying, and fled to a foreign country. That's disgusting. Men are very commonly falsely accused of Rape and Domestic Violence, that's why I brought it up. It's a very recent account of a Woman potentially lying and getting away with it, yet again.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:33 PM
1

If they do not severely punish that girl for falsely accusing that boy, leading to his suicide, they have just told her and other girls that it's completely okay to falsely accuse, and they've set a legal precedent that future girls will not be punished. That's fucking disgusting. 50 years in prison served at minimum.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:23 PM
12

For anyone interested, there was a high profile case here in Australia very recently. The accuser is now living in Paris, with a large sum of "compensation" money. I am not sure that her alleged "attacker" was ever proven guilty with any sort of evidence. Her name is Brittany Higgins. Vague language for litigious protection.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:54 PM
2

Let me guess, this Man isn't going to see one cent of compensation, his name will be forever muddied and the Woman will not see one minuscule amount of punishment for lying. The Law at work. You just have to admire it.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:45 PM
1

No. The "Gender Pay Gap" does not and cannot exist, at least systematically. By definition and mechanism of action, it's really hard to prove what does constitute discrimination by gender. Even if your boss is a misogynistic pig and is paying you less entirely based upon gender, try proving it. If 2 people who went to the same schools, got the same grades, studied and passed the same qualification at the same university, applied and got accepted to the same company for the same job, signed the s…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 07:29 PM
2

I'm opting out because I am happier being single and I enjoy being alone. Alone, not lonely. I also have no faith in the Law. Until the Law starts protecting me and I see positive action and dialogue towards Men's Rights, I completely disregard and want nothing to do with any Woman.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:59 PM
2

There will always be War. War is not "this particular group" against "this other particular group". War is all against all, bellum omnium contra omnes. It's a Universal Law. There will always be someone who disagrees with you. There will always be someone who disagrees with those who disagree with you, and so on. People will never universally get along. The only way we can make-do with War is to try our best to fight for good reasons. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:45 PM
1

Be happy being Single, it's the safest thing to be until Laws protect Men better.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:40 PM
27

I hope you didn't talk to the cops. From this point on, do not ever talk to the cops or her. Say these exact words: "I decline to make any comment unless my Lawyer is present.". Have your Lawyer write down your exact whereabouts for the entire time period, with receipts and witnesses. She will have to prove her side of the story, too. Make no mistake, you are going to have to bend over backwards to prove yourself innocent. She doesn't have to do much at all. Don't give her or the cops any ammo a…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:30 PM
19

I can't say what I advocate for in this instance. Unless you have video evidence like this, you are screwed. There is nobody who will believe you, you will have to bend over backward to defend yourself and she won't have to prove a single thing. The best outcome you have is to settle out of court for a monumental sum of money and an acquittal. The most likely is a domestic violence charge, 6 months in prison and a mark on your name forever.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:15 PM
2

No. Women initiate divorce for many reasons, not just infidelity. They could have been forced to marry, maybe it was arranged. Maybe they are Gay. Maybe they aren't happy in that relationship, maybe they don't want a relationship at all. The list goes on. That quote is utter bullshit. It diminishes Man into some troglodytic sex maniac. You could say some equally stupid shit about Women, too. But, that's the thing. Generalizations are bullshit. Some Men are sex maniacs or morons, not all. Some Wo…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:09 PM
2

A Woman I know says this all the time. In her case, it stems from being mistreated and cheated on by her husband for their entire married life, including while dating. I don't think she really means what she says, she's just frustrated and has a hard time coming to terms with how he could even treat her like that. The easiest thing to do in her mind is to assume every other Man is also an arsehole and treat them accordingly, in order to not be hurt again. Very common avoidance behaviour as a cop…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:02 PM
4

I get told "You're just arguing the point!" a lot. Yes, arguing the point is the point of arguing. If your argument has no point, what's the fucking point, haha.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:29 PM
2

"all women in this room have had to act different in front of a man" - Okay, and? Most people have had to monitor their language, appearance and actions in front of certain people. It's called fitting in, being respectful, knowing your audience. Sometimes it's legitimate, sometimes not. I see no point in this quote. "Men are a protected class" - Really? I'm a Man, I don't feel protected at all. In fact, I feel quite oppressed by the Laws that are supposed to protect me against false claims and g…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:17 PM
1

Ah, the victim is a moron. No harm done, then.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:25 AM
1

Bras, Makeup, Expensive clothing and Accessories are all optional personal choices. The only person they can blame is themselves. They chose to wear them, nobody made them. There is no acceptable argument to the contrary. Take accountability for your decisions; your feet hurt in those heels because heels are fucking uncomfortable and you chose to wear them anyway.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:00 AM
7

Men's spaces are seen as "harmful" because they are Men's spaces. Rabid-Feminists don't want men to have anything. Simple.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:08 AM
1

Same. Domestic partnership after 2 years in the same house, regardless of personal choice or even a legitimate signed and notarized document.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 11:40 AM
1

In 20 years I will still be single and I will still be happy. I have no interest in being friends with any Woman, let alone sex or a relationship. Stay in your corner and I'll stay in mine. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 11:33 AM
0

By definition, the pay gap does not exist in the west. Maybe in countries like the emirates, iran, qatar, and other religious places where Women are viewed as ornaments. However, in the west, there are way too many variables to consider just putting a blanket over the non-issue. Even in more anti-Woman countries it's not as cut-and-dry. Imo, the entire non-issue boils down to this: Want more pay? Go for it. It's up to the individual to make sure their pay is being fairly given to them, that's it…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:57 AM
4

Okay, fine. Let's say it works and can be used as evidence in court. What then? How does it prove the screams are from domestic abuse and not a false accusation? What about visual evidence? What about Men, are we going to be protected to the same degree? What if we are attacked, can we defend ourselves or will the audio be used against us? What about privacy, how can we be assured that it can't and won't be used to spy on us? I already know all the answers to my above questions, the same answers…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter