TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AgincourtSalute Archive

View 17 posts and 439 comments by AgincourtSalute on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2879

Activism/SupportAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:44 AM
338

HealthAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:11 AM
288

HealthAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:00 PM
230

Marriage/ChildrenAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:33 AM
126

ProgressAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:33 PM
104

Social IssuesAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:08 AM
78

GeneralAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:01 AM
47

Social IssuesAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:49 AM
45

Social IssuesAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights15/05/19 11:23 AM
43

Legal RightsAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:48 AM
30

ProgressAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:22 AM
29

Social IssuesAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:40 AM
20

Activism/SupportAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:18 AM
15

HealthAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:43 AM
1

ProgressAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:34 PM
0

Edu./Occu.AgincourtSalute/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:14 AM
0

GeneralAgincourtSalute/r/MensRights18/02/22 08:23 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell, Animal Farm.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:21 PM
10

There are religious groups whose members refuse military service and become conscientious objectors. These men get sent to prison and serve time in countries like Azerbaijan, Singapore, and South Korea. Organisations like forum18.org report on many cases if you interested. So, in answer to your question, men comply, or they lose their freedom. It's basically 'Join up, or Jail'.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 03:53 PM
5

“How can you be skinny and flabby at the same time?”
/r/MensRights04/12/25 11:53 PM
30

Don't bother. There are so few women working on the infrastructure that if the last man leaves the country the lights will all be going out shortly afterward anyway.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 06:05 PM
12

I love it.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 10:37 AM
3

I have a dog and I walk that dog in public. My dog is not a scary dog, it doesn't bark, or try to jump up at people, or even walk towards them; it just happily walks next to me. Some people seem very comfortable around my dog, whilst others seem to be scared of it. In my experience the people who are comfortable might have grown up with dogs, or they live with a dog, or they like dogs. The people who are scared are usually people who are not used to being around a dog. How many of these scared f…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:41 AM
1

Just laugh and tell them it’s not involuntary, it’s entirely a positive life choice.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 02:42 PM
1

Cleaners work indoors. Refuse collectors are outside in all weathers. Cleaners operate a vacuum cleaner in an office. Refuse collectors operate heavy machinery whilst standing in the road during rush hour. Cleaners empty waste paper baskets and do the washing up. Refuse collectors empty compost bins and shovel up roadkill.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:22 PM
6

The staff of the NHS is 75% female. The life expectancy of men in the UK is significantly shorter than that of women. This appears to be an environment where ‘toxic femininity’ is measurable with statistics, but yet we never hear about it.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:34 AM
118

Some years ago a Men's Shed first opened near me. I went along to see what it was about and there were women there making tea and 'supervising'. I never went back.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:50 AM
2

Or the other extreme, ‘humans cause all of humans problems’.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:52 PM
1

So the next time I have a partner move in I should insist that they pay half of all the expenses, that we buy and cook our own food, and that we alternate every household chore? We should only ever make a drink for ourselves, not each other, if we go out out I should insist that they drive themselves in their own car, and we must only ever make our own side of the bed? And if we don’t behave in this unhinged way then one of us is exploiting the other and forcing them to do ‘unpaid labour’? I thi…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 03:56 PM
3

What exactly is this ‘unpaid labour’ that women are forced into? As a single man who works full time, I do my own shopping, cook my own meals, clean my own house, do my own laundry, walk my own dogs, and organise my own social life. Nobody pays me to do this; it’s called being a responsible adult. If someone were to move into my house with me, whether they wanted me to continue covering all the bills without them contributing, or if they were willing to contribute half financially, I would still…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 02:32 PM
1

I’m an average build five ten guy. Can a smaller person hit me? I’ve had a woman give me an unprovoked nose bleed before, is that ok? What isn’t obvious to an outside observer is my blood clotting disorder. A nosebleed for me has serious consequences, despite appearances. Violence is never an appropriate response.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 01:18 PM
3

So Jess Philips, a Member of Parliament for nine years, and the current Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, is telling us that we live in a patriarchy? A woman, who has held a position of power in this country for almost a decade, who’s current role is to protect the most protected demographic against a thing which primarily happens to another demographic, is telling us that men rule our society for the benefit of other men? And she is su…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:32 AM
6

They never said it was. They said that a relationship on tv showed an example of this toxic trait and that it became a topic of conversation at work. They then said that some defended this relationship, whilst others did not, and they never stated their own stance. From context we might assume that they too do not believe that this is how relationships work. And resorting to insults is a low form of argument.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 06:58 AM
4

The settlement they were hoping for was supposedly because the changes weren’t adequately communicated to them. The new law was passed in 1995, and the first women to be effected by it turned 60 in 2010. They had fifteen years to find out about it and to adjust their plans, but apparently that’s not enough notice for them and they need a payout. They are just sore because they got the type of equality that they didn’t want. They were told that, in fifteen years time, they were going to get the s…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 01:58 PM
12

There’s a word for that behaviour.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:07 PM
6

How many jokes have we seen where a wife is waiting at home for her husband brandishing a rolling pin? I’d argue that there are far more husband beating jokes than wife beating ones, and that society finds one of them far more acceptable than the other.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:28 AM
1

That’s my point; everyone is very different. Society is made up of unique individuals and we can all find common ground in the parts of human experience that we share. That’s why it is unwise to draw an arbitrary line down the middle of it and say that all the people on one side are like this and all the people on the other side are like that.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 12:22 PM
2

Does anyone know what it is like to live as another? To ‘other’ half of the population is to ignore the fact that we have more in common than that which separates us, and to express hatred for people because you feel they are different to you is simply prejudice.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 10:33 AM
4

“Men are our biggest natural predators.“ Last year in the UK there were just under 600 murders. A third of the victims were women, so about 200 deaths. We could be unfair and suggest that every one of these was murdered by a man. Last year in the UK the largest cause of death in the female population was dementia or Alzheimer’s, which took just over 42,500 women. Maths would dictate that a woman is far more likely to make it into old age than to be murdered by a man. However it seems they are in…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 10:28 AM
17

Statistically a man who steps in to help is far more likely to become a victim of violence than the woman being robbed.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 10:47 PM
1

If I had to choose between a woman and a bear, I think I’d choose the bear too. A bear doesn’t try to hide the fact that they want to kill you. Also, with a bear, I stand a chance of getting a hug.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:50 PM
16

After a worried call from my sister in law I drove my Mum a couple of hours to my brother’s house. He’d locked himself in the bathroom and wouldn’t come out. We eventually coaxed him out and could see the physical evidence of where his wife had hit him. She had got frustrated at him and had lashed out. She was taller than him and weighed more. He was hurt, physically and emotionally, and had locked himself away out of fear that he might retaliate. We did what we could, and they stayed together, …
/r/MensRights13/03/24 10:03 PM
11

Religious people should not be hypocritical. If she believes in a higher being, she should also believe that it is wrong to sit on your cash and watch your spouse have to borrow money to feed you. I can think of several scriptures that would show her actions to be very wrong, and that her god would condemn her for her awful behaviour.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 07:15 AM
2

I’ve come back several hours later and been reading all of your comments. I just want to repeat, “OP is obviously an excellent parent”. With you backing him I’m sure he has everything he needs.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 12:48 AM
12

Lots of good advice here, and OP is obviously an excellent parent. A lot is said in the media about raising our sons not to be abusive, but in truth all our children need to be taught this. We already teach our boys that it is wrong to hit girls, but we also need to teach our girls that it is wrong to hit boys. And, as OP says, we need to talk to our sons about what to do if they are the victim of an abusive partner.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:17 PM
6

We do not know what men aren’t telling us. Perhaps if there were as many male therapists as female ones, if there were refuges for men, or if men were not mocked and belittled for their feelings, then more men would feel that they could talk, and fewer men would die. As it is we suffer in silence, and quietly end our lives.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:05 PM
5

You don’t know what other people are thinking.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 11:44 AM
2

This is not strictly true. Being the consort of a Queen does not automatically make you a prince. Phillip was already a Prince of Greece and Denmark, and Albert was Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld. Also the consort of a Queen might outrank her. Mary the first was married to King Philip II of Spain.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:21 PM
1

Interestingly it is to do with sexism. It’s the old “what’s hers is hers but what’s his belongs to both of them”. In the British aristocracy if a man marries below his rank, his wife is automatically elevated to his level. For example, if a duke married a commoner she would become a duchess. If a woman marries below her rank, her husband does not automatically climb the social ladder. So if a duchess marries a commoner he would remain a plain old mister. So basically a woman can ‘better herself’…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:14 PM
6

And their faces are all over the press, whilst the woman who gave an unproven, probably false, accusation cannot be named for legal reasons.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:21 AM
9

Maybe you’ve heard the saying, "When you point one finger, there are three fingers pointing back to you."
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:35 AM
1

This ‘violent criminal’ who was running away from a knife wielding assailant, and defending himself from an unlawful arrest, has proven in a court of law that he did not fire a gun toward any person. Let us not miss the point though that he was then shot and injured by a police officer and left the scene in an ambulance. I understand that you think he should have faced more than the jail term that he served, but we also feel that the original attacker, and the incompetent police officer who ille…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 11:19 PM
1

Women could have bank accounts before then; they just needed a guarantor to sign for them to be able to set one up. The reason being that, up until then, the husband would be legally liable for any debt his wife accrued, so the bank needed him to accept that responsibility before they would open an account in her name. Also, the majority of these women in their nineties will have by now outlived their partners and inherited the retirement benefits that were built up jointly for the couple by the…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 06:36 AM
0

Prince William. He seems to be a pretty well rounded guy. He is a good dad, a supportive husband, and he chose a challenging job where he could help people. He takes his commitments seriously, without taking himself too seriously.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 11:01 PM
3

He didn’t even put kisses. He put xx, yy, and zz next to things to indicate where information should be added. It seems like this woman was just delusional.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 09:01 AM
2

Both of your comments refer to it being ’easier’ to deal with cleanliness in one way or another. It feels like, rather than a ‘preventative health measure’ you perhaps view the circumcised boys in your care as more convenient for you to to look after. Whilst I respect you for the work that you do, and appreciate the hard work you put in, I still feel that surgically modifying a child to make it easier to care for them would be a dangerous precedent. We could, for example, advocate pulling all th…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 05:53 AM
6

Are you suggesting that it would be best practice to circumcise boys in care, or those who have issues with cognitive understanding, for hygiene reasons? In your experience, do these children have dirty fingernails, or dirt between their toes? Should we also advocate for removal of other body parts because we’re not sure they’ll keep them clean? Surely surgical body modification should not be the go to for keeping clean.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:00 PM
1

I once was lost, but now am found.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:35 AM
30

I think that this is a very well done advert. It shows the problems to be the terrible things that they are but keeps exactly the right tone. We can see that each thing is wrong, and that anyone can be a victim. Well done Ireland!
/r/MensRights10/02/23 09:52 AM
21

When I was in prison about 25% to 30% of the staff were female. A few were inappropriately flirty, and some were your typical butch lesbian types, but all of them seemed to be getting a kick out of being able to dominate men. Prison is not a male only space; it is yet another space where women have infiltrated in order to control men.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:50 AM
7

So they have to wear a jacket? Are male representatives also required to wear jackets? What is the ruling on neck ties? In the UK a male politician joining a debate via video was not allowed to speak because he was dressed too informally. There does need to be some respectful standard that all should adhere to.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:22 PM
4

Oops. You seem to have made a bit of a Freudian slut.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:45 PM
12

Please can you explain why empowered women are good for society, but empowered men are not?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 07:09 AM
58

I was in a financially abusive marriage. By four on a Tuesday afternoon I would have been at work for as long as she was going to work all week. I was doing an average of 42 hours a week, commuting on public transport, spending an hour each morning before work walking our dogs, returning in the evening after work to put our youngest to bed and often cook for myself as there was no dinner for me. She had access to everything I earned, and 92% of my wages went straight out on our regular bills. Sh…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 08:40 AM
3

Also worth noting that England has never excluded people from voting based on their race.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 01:33 AM
25

Had an interesting discussion with a female family member recently. She mentioned the gynaecologist as she had a recent health issue. In conversation I mentioned the andrologist. She was puzzled and asked what that was. I was able to explain that a gynaecologist deals with a woman’s reproductive health, and an andrologist deals with a man’s. She said that she’d never heard of it, and I pointed out that whilst there are appropriately 8,000 gynaecologists in the UK, there are only around 200 andro…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 07:25 PM
4

On point two, Casanova, who died at the end of the 1700s, claimed to have had 122 lovers, whom he ‘satisfied’ successfully. This would indicate that, at least among the monied classes of Venice, casual sexual liaisons must have been fairly common. It would seem that these women were free to explore and enjoy these physical affairs, and they were not just trying to procreate.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:46 AM
11

We know that misandry is a serious problem with real life harmful consequences. However, even if it were only ‘hurt feelings’ this still wouldn’t be acceptable. Why is it ok to set out to hurt half the population?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:04 AM
24

Presumably this is about Emmett Till? If so, why is there a woman in this picture? Innocent black boy killed - women most effected.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:53 AM
1

I know that at the end of Obama’s presidency there were some Americans expressing disappointment that he hadn’t done more for minorities during his term, but I don’t recall if statements like the one above were made when he entered office.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:43 PM
9

You are correct, this is blatantly obvious. However some people see that a millionaire shares one characteristic with a labourer, and conclude that the labourer must share most of the privileges of the millionaire. We can all see how wrong this conclusion is, and yet people still accuse random, working class men of benefitting from a ‘patriarchy’.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:45 AM
3

Quotes in my post are taken from an article in Metro - Rishi Sunak becoming prime minister is not a win for representation - by Natalie Morris https://metro.co.uk/2022/10/26/rishi-sunak-becoming-prime-minister-is-not-a-win-for-representation-17639431/amp/
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:04 AM
10

I wholeheartedly agree with you, these spaces are important. What saddens me most though is not the full frontal opposition to male spaces; this is easily shown to be bigoted and wrong. Rather it is the insidious worming in and undermining of these spaces. I have posted in this thread already my experience of a Men’s Shed, and I wonder if others have seen the same. I suspect it begins with an innocent offer to come and make tea, or bring a cake, but it ends with a full on meeting of the WI with …
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:15 AM
10

I was going through a rough patch and felt that I needed a male haven in my life. I heard about Men’s Sheds and was very interested; the concept was exactly what I was looking for. I went to the local one and found almost as many women present as men. They were making tea and pottering around, joining every conversation. It felt like they were the teachers in a schoolroom full of men; supervising and overseeing. I was so disappointed. I never went back. I’ve now moved hundreds of miles away. The…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:03 AM
12

Equally, if you are looking at all of history and saying, “Gosh! That really sucked…for women!” Then you are also fairly wide of the mark.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 07:59 AM
57

Judge Bury told her: "You have got yourself into a bit of a pickle." Interesting way to describe someone with previous convictions for shoplifting and theft, a heroin addiction, a suspended sentence for drugs offences, and who fails to attend their probation meetings. Most judges would call that person, “the prisoner”.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:24 PM
1

If I found a roast dinner in a public bin, I wouldn’t eat it. It may look good and smell nice, it might have great nutritional ingredients, it may even taste nice. But I know where it came from, and where it’s been, so I wouldn’t want anything to do with it. A few within the feminist movement may have the best intentions and the purest of ideals, but the movement itself is mired in the dirt of hatred, and that permeates even the best parts. Better not to nibble on the bits you think are clean an…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:02 PM
17

I’ll tell you what’s weird: you say this board is bad, and yet here you are, trolling people and adding your inane opinions on everything. Have you noticed that, despite your toxic and hurtful comments, you still haven’t been banned? Despite the fact that you are obviously only here to try and cause offence, we are still tolerating you and have not dropped to your low level of attack. You are behaving like a spiteful child and the men that you are here to mock and deride are still treating you w…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:11 AM
10

Your comment here wasn’t about murder; your comment was about sex offenders. I have addressed your murder comment below, but you are trying to change the subject here because you know you are struggling to win the argument. This is a very low debating tactic. Your original comment used the term “recorded sex offenders” which is interesting because even you are alluding to the fact that there are unrecorded ones. That would include unreported attacks, but also every single woman rapist in my coun…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:17 AM
9

All killer sharks are fish so there is every chance you will get killed by your goldfish!
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:58 AM
11

In my country the legal definition of rape means that the figures cannot include women in this statistic. Therefore the numbers are skewed.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:56 AM
5

It could be so easy: Wednesday for Women - Monday for Men. I would be interested to know what their customer statistics are. Are men the majority users, and that is why they need a protected time for women? Or are men in the minority and this plan will just alienate them more?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:02 AM
45

So…”respect all victims” or “investigate all allegations“ or “take all reports seriously” or anything else that is proactive, supportive, and egalitarian really without the sexist, misandrist, ‘guilty until proven innocent’ aspects of “believe all women”.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:46 AM
6

Out of interest, let's draw a comparison with religion. There are places in the world where Christianity is oppressed, and people of that faith are discriminated against. However, in the majority of the world they are allowed freedom of religion, and perhaps even get preferential treatment. Does the treatment they receive in a minority of countries mean that organisations such as Amnesty International aught to be Christian based? Similarly, there are places where women are still oppressed, but t…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:58 AM
2

Trolls have a very short life expectancy it seems.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:17 PM
2

I work in an office where most of the staff are women. My supervisor is a woman. Our manager is a woman. Her boss is a woman. My GP is a woman. My dentist is a woman. When I went to prison my supervising prison officer, police officer, and probation officer were all women. My local MP is a woman. It looks like the next Prime Minister will be a woman ( the third one we’ve had). For all of my life there has been a woman on the throne. In public I will be expected to open doors and offer my seat to…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:49 PM
3

Was there not a historical codependency? Looking at the records we often see that, if a man was left with children when his wife died, he would quickly remarry because the family unit needed a wife and mother at home just as much as it needed a breadwinner.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:13 PM
17

First stagger in with your eyes closed. Then, in a loud voice, ask if any person in the room is willing to consent to you looking at them. Listen carefully for an affirmative response and try to catch which direction it came from. Turn in that direction and carefully open your eyes. Whilst looking at either the floor or the ceiling ask for the person who responded to clearly identify themselves. Now make eye contact. If their eyes are open you may now report them for looking at you without your …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:20 PM
1

How will these officers police this? To know whether I’m looking at someone they would have to stare at me, and I don’t give my consent for that!
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:13 PM
1

Included in the article is a quote from Martina Navratilova, “Have we (women) ever tried to explain to men how to shave or how to take care of their prostate or whatever?” Erm… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Eeles Just the first one I found. I’m sure there are many more examples.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:45 AM
3

Jennie Eclair, Daisy Buchanan, the representative of Crown Paints, and the spokesperson for the Advertising Standards Agency are all female. The only man mentioned in the article is the wronged character in the advert, and he has no voice in this BBC article. Whilst it is good to see women publicly standing up for the paternity rights of men, did nobody consider talking to a man, any man, to get his opinion on this slight against fatherhood?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:20 PM
10

So is it ok to plot against someone and commit them to years of paternity payments against their will if we don’t feel that they are a ‘good man’? I would suggest that your judgment of his moral character is probably correct, but that the actions of his girlfriend are equally reprehensible. Whether we are good men, and perhaps even more importantly, if we are bad men, it is our responsibility to take control of our own birth control methods.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:38 AM
41

“My body : My choice”. If a woman can get an abortion without telling the man involved, then a man can have a vasectomy without telling anyone either.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:01 AM
2

Married men earn more money than single men. Is this because, once a man is married, he has to work harder, longer hours to support a family? Or is this because women marry the ones who earn more, and the lower earners remain single because the women don’t see them as a marriage prospect?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 08:51 AM
14

Sometimes when I wash my dog I use baby shampoo. I get a real kick out of the fact that my shampoo is not tested on animals, but my dogs shampoo is tested on babies.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 02:03 PM
2

I love that I have managed to raise my son to be a better man than me. I struggled through life and didn’t reach out for the help that I needed. He has benefited from my shortcomings and is a man that I am proud of, and wish that I could be.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:00 PM
9

More than three quarters of the staff of the NHS are female. Suggesting that they are unaware, or are uncaring of female health problems is totally unbelievable. Ignoring the fact that men die younger than women is unforgivable. The CEO of the NHS is a woman, and the staff is predominantly female, and they are allocating more funding for womens health, even though this area already has more funding than mens health, and men still have a shorter life expectancy. Yet there are still claims that th…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:42 AM
10

I used to work in the admin offices of schools that were predominantly female environments. One of my favourite managers was a fiercely protective woman. Whenever someone put their head round our door and asked me to carry boxes for them she would challenge them and point out that they never used to ask the same of the woman who did my job before me. She was a shining beacon of equality and my favourite work colleague of all time.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 08:08 AM
10

Feminist: Men should talk about their problems! OP: Cool. I have something I’d like to get off my che… Feminist: Not you Johny!
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:08 AM
8

Well yes, of course! In the years before the vote was given them they weren’t allowed to go and enjoy the front lines of the First World War; they were forced by the oppressive, male run government to stay at home while the men had the wonderful opportunity to die in their hundreds of thousands. In the decades before that the terrible patriarch Queen Victoria oversaw education reforms that oppressively forced young girls and women into schools instead of allowing them the freedom to work in dang…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:00 AM
9

HR is not your friend.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:39 AM
1

I shall take your word for those figures, but the point is that the split is not down the line of gender, but down a political line that has all genders on all sides. Her video trying to make this a sexually partisan issue is incorrect, unfair, and dangerous.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:28 PM
22

When I moved to a new area I was very impressed when I saw that my new refuse collection team included a woman working alongside the men. I respect them all for their unhypocritical hiring policies.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:02 AM
2

True. But whether a decision is good or bad is often subjective. Here in the UK for example we voted to leave the European Union. It was a decision arrived at democratically, but only won by a slim margin. This gave rise to many people who disagreed with the decision vociferously stating that it was a bad idea, whilst the vote showed that, on that day at least, a majority thought it was a good idea. Presumably, as the latest change in the law in the US was proposed by democratically appointed pe…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:55 AM
9

Perhaps an American could educate me as I am British, but I thought that the electorate there was actually majority female by a slight percentage. And aren’t the majority of the lawmakers who pushed this bill through female too? Is she blaming men for a problem that has been arrived at by a demographically equal group, or perhaps even female led group?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:24 AM
12

When someone calls a ‘strike’ they are withholding labour. Women who are participating in a sex strike obviously view sex as work, and are implying that this is the most valuable thing about them.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:19 AM
4

Perhaps it’s just the age groups that I mix with and people’s topics of discussion, but I think I’ve met more men who did their national service than I have met women who’ve had abortions. (I’m a UK man with some old friends)
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:05 AM
9

And, in most countries, the female electorate outnumber the male one.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:59 AM
10

And I have been badly treated by women all my life; from neglect and manipulation, up to abuse and sexual assault, but I know that the bad women I have encountered do not represent all women.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:47 AM
6

“Theory” - this is yet to be proven in real world conditions.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:43 AM
1

TheTinMen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:47 PM
1

TheTinMen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:45 PM
1

TheTinMen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:44 PM
1

thetinmen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:43 PM
1

thetinmen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:43 PM
1

@thetinmen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:43 PM
2

@thetinmen posts almost daily on Instagram. It is a thought provoking, well balanced, informative account and well worth following. I love it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:42 PM
5

Indeed. In my failed marriage I slowly conceded every part of myself. I surrendered in tiny increments every day until I had nothing, and felt that I was nothing. It took a complete breakdown of my mental health, a spectacular end to the marriage, and a lot of therapy for me to realise that the relationship was emotionally and financially abusive and that I was much better out of it.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:42 AM
9

Wholesome! Thank you. And good job for getting your life back together.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:29 PM
14

The fact that the child is wearing a rainbow shirt makes me think that perhaps this is Dad and Step Dad, and that they are a couple.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:28 PM
1

Oh, and you need to charge your phone.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:48 PM
4

I’m British. Karl Benz invented the first car in Germany and his wife drove it almost straight away. Saudi Arabia was the only country in the world that didn’t allow women to drive, and that ban started in 1957 and lasted 61 years. When, worldwide, women drove cars from almost the moment they were invented, and it seems that only one country banned this, I find it weird that people keep claiming that ‘women weren’t allowed to drive’. You are correct; Reddit includes more countries that the Unite…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:15 AM
2

People keep saying this and I’m confused. When we’re women not allowed to drive?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:50 PM
5

Everything. I rode away on my motorbike with a backpack. She kept everything else.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:39 PM
6

Similar to paying into a pension, hours worked over a lifetime should be logged. Once a person has worked, say 85,000 hours, then they can have the option to retire. There could perhaps be a flexibility in the hour requirement based on the physical difficulties of a job; a flat rate for an office job, but time and a half for working as a labourer, for example.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:47 AM
1

I do not defend pronouns. I defend good grammar and accurate use of the English language.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 08:33 PM
1

I think your grammar, sentence structure, use of capitals, and punctuation are atrocious. You say that I hate the truth, but the truth is that I hate bad grammar. Looking at your use of language, I don’t think I’ll be taking any literarily advice from you, thank you.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:13 PM
10

‘By their fruits you will recognise them’. When I see mainstream feminism supporting equality, then I shall believe that is an organisation supporting equality. Until then I shall call myself an egalitarian and continue to observe their hypocrisy from a distance.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:10 PM
1

“He likes cake” - single person. “I like cake” - single person. Both like and likes can refer to a single person. “Take this cake to the last customer; they’re sitting in the corner” - single person. They and them can refer to a group of people, or a single person. This is especially true when their gender is unspecified. “I get embarrassed when I’m in a lift with one other person; I never know if I should talk to them or not” I hate it when people claim that correct grammar doesn’t support the …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:58 PM
21

Think for a moment about the fact that you are still able to post and comment in this sub. If you truly believe that “the solution to all these issues is….having open and honest conversations” (quote from one of your responses to comments here) then kindly use your non-binary privilege to go to the feminist subs that have banned us all and tell them that. This sub accepts posts, comments, and conversations from people like yourself, as well as from feminists and other people who obviously disagr…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:40 PM
14

I think this sub is actually quite accepting. I can , however, see why comments like this get downvotes. If a person were to go to a BLM rally and express that ‘all lives matter’, they would not be well received. Similarly, coming onto a Mens Rights sub and using it as a platform for women, trans, non binary, and other genders is considered bad form. We agree that all of these people have issues that need advocacy, but this is the sub for Mens Rights. Equally it would be wrong for us to go to a …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:27 PM
19

Yes. If you are looking for loopholes because you are struggling against accusations of discrimination, then you are probably discriminating against someone.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:47 AM
4

Fortunately our masculinity is not defined by what we do in the privacy of the bathroom. Having someone else dictate how you go about your toilet may be emasculating, so you should do as you please. Our peeing posture doesn’t make us who we are, but our self autonomy does.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:46 PM
3

Looking forward to the update.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:48 PM
1

If their gender were “they/their” then the sentence above would require the use of ‘their’. Nobody is disrespecting their pronouns, but we are trying to respect correct grammar.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:45 PM
63

On this occasion ’their’ would have been grammatically correct, and ‘they’ wouldn’t. Also ‘know’ and not ‘knew’. I’m not even going to mention the abbreviations. Source: pedantic English speaker.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:56 PM
8

It’s not being a feminist that gets you banned. It’s being here on this subreddit will get you banned from feminist subreddits. Whilst some of us don’t care that we are banned from there, a feminist might be annoyed to find that they got banned from their ‘home’ subs for simply putting their head in our door. It was just a friendly warning that taking part in our discussion might exclude you from commenting on your other favourite subs.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:49 PM
1

One problem with modern society is that people confuse ‘listen to’ with ‘agree with’. We can listen to a diverse group of opinions, and it’s healthy to do so. We should never condemn a person because they listened to an opposing view. Society would do well to learn this and start listening, and debating, instead of ‘cancelling’ opinions they don’t agree with.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 08:17 PM
25

I don’t really know what the film is about, but one thing that struck me is that every man in the trailer is played by the same actor. What does this say about the disposability of men? Does it suggest that men are all the same?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:57 PM
5

If you are anti-man, then why are you on the Mens Rights sub? It’s weird that you are accusing people of spending too much time on an issue that they care about, whilst you are wasting your time on a subreddit that you don’t even agree with. You are a misandrist troll and I hope that nobody else bothers feeding your hate filled gluttony on this sub.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:34 PM
6

Are you telling men to get a vasectomy? I’m sorry: no vas deferens- no opinion.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 04:15 PM
2

I reserve the right to view murderers as villains, regardless of their gender, race, religion, or political beliefs.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:10 AM
1

So your premise is that "Women only gyms are born out of oppressive need", so men in a mixed gym are inclined to approach women and make them feel uncomfortable. But "a men only gym would imply homosexual preference", so men in a male only gym must be gay. It sounds very much like you are saying that either men desperately want women, or they must be gay, and either way, they just can't help themselves. What about the vast majority of men who are not cartoon wolves when a woman enters the room a…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:35 PM
3

Do women have to chose the jobs that are not as well paid?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 10:42 PM
1

The point was that being a parent takes a physical toll on a person, and both parents should be able to make a fully informed choice before being forced into that commitment. Some people are claiming that the mother has more ‘skin in the game’ and can therefore leave the father out of the decision completely. My workplace statistic was to point out that men too are willing to risk their lives for their children and that is emotionally unfair to exclude them from the decision making process. It i…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:42 PM
2

No. But it also means that a father shouldn’t be forced to go through a lifetime of supporting a child if the mother wants him to.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:27 AM
1

People are pregnant for nine months. People are expected to spend around 45 years of their life in work. When you consider the frequency of the risk these figures become a lot more equal. As for the long term consequences, the same comparisons can be drawn between pregnancy and work. Many millions of people suffer health difficulties as a result of the work that they have done. My main point however was that society is very quick to see the sacrifices that a mother makes and put her on a pedesta…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:16 AM
5

No. I haven’t blocked you. I don’t block people. I always appreciate a discussion.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:09 AM
4

Every year in the USA about 700 women die in childbirth. Every year in the USA about 5000 people die in work related injuries. In 2020 4377 of these were men. Statistically, in the USA, it is more likely that a man will die while working to provide for his child than it is that a woman will die giving birth to that child.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:40 AM
1

How does a man earn money? Does the effort of working hard for eighteen years not take a toll on his body? Why do you think men die younger? Why are the majority of workplace deaths men? There is no doubt that the time and effort that a mother puts into bringing a child into the world costs her body dearly. But you must admit that supporting that child, and often the mother, financially for two decades also has a detrimental effect on the mind and body of the father.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:27 AM
3

How many women were imprisoned for not paying for their child last year? How many women had their pay checks stopped against their will, or were dragged through the courts to make them pay? The responsibility of the father is viciously enforced by the police, the courts, and the prison system. This is not equivalent to the treatment that mothers receive.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:19 AM
56

They both took the risk. Only one has the option of further decisions on the issue.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:52 PM
4

You seem to have lowered yourself to the animalistic ways of a wild animal. Some of us are not so beastly. How about you raise yourself back up to the level of humans and advocate for justice and equality?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:20 PM
12

I wonder what the statistics are for this situation compared to the times that a woman has used a pregnancy to ‘trap’ a man financially or in a relationship. I suspect that there are probably more men that have been caught out by this than there are men using this to abuse women.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:16 PM
8

The other side of this coin would be that every pregnancy should be terminated unless the father specifically signs to say that he wants the child and is willing to give financial support. She has no right to carry his child unless he wants to be a father. Doesn’t that sound horrible and barbaric? And yet this is the control that women currently have over men, and somehow people are still defending this. Can we not just tip the scales to be a little more equal?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:12 PM
9

That is a very toxic statement.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:06 PM
14

To play devils advocate here, does that mean that when a woman has a baby and her career suffers because of this, this too is not an equality problem? After all, it’s women’s bodies that are carrying the child. Equality is a difficult thing when people are different. There may never be a perfect answer, but can we agree that a father aught to be involved in the decision, or even just be informed of the situation? The fact that one of the parents controls all of the information and has the ultima…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:04 PM
5

That’s a very strong opinion, and you put it across quite forcefully. You are right, ultimately it is the woman who has control over her own body. However, seeing as we are on a sub discussing mens rights, would you consider looking at the rights of the man in this issue? OP said that they felt it was evil that someone could abort a child without the father’s knowledge or consent. Whilst his ‘consent’ might not be on the table here, could you at least consider that he should be informed of the d…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:51 PM
2

There have been a few highly publicised attacks on women in London, but it’s dishonest to call it an epidemic. The real epidemic is the continuing list of young black men who have been stabbed to death in our capital. Surely that should be the more pressing issue for the mayor of that city, but I suppose that would win fewer votes.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:06 AM
2

It’s all over the official twitter account of the mayor. Check the hashtag to find it all.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:57 AM
2

As a man in the ‘kicked’ camp I can easily believe that most men have been hit in the groin by a female at some point in their life. I’ve seen it happen to friends and family members, and I’ve even seen it happen in the street. I can also agree that it is a very common thing if films and tv programs. What makes you think it doesn’t happen?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:03 PM
7

They should have removed her from the premises and offered to assist him with the forms for a restraining order. Telling a victim that they are lucky because the police didn’t arrest them is not a good response.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:51 PM
7

Surely she should have been in a cell and you should have been at home changing the locks. Even when a man is a victim of extreme violence like this they still get him to leave and not her. Added to this the lack of male shelters means that you had nowhere to go whilst your attacker enjoyed the comfort of your home.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:48 PM
6

That’s the drawback of universal suffrage - everyone gets to vote. Even people you don’t agree with.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 11:45 PM
1

Indeed. In the 21st century the fight is definitely for equality. So let’s see how this plays out this time. Is it true equality, or is it selective?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:07 PM
1

Although the suffragette movement was very active just before the First World War, but the posters that were put up when the fighting started said, “Women of Britain say ‘Go!’” and the ‘white feather’ movement seemed to indicate that those women were comfortable with male conscription. Perhaps now, in a century where feminist equality is much nearer than ever before in history, and we seem poised on the edge of a war with Russia, we shall see if history shall repeat itself, or if the equality th…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:52 PM
1

It says that one bra was burned, along with many other symbolic items, to demonstrate the feminist idea of throwing off items that had been instrumental in oppressing women. It was, as I say, a metaphor for the destruction of the system used to hold women back from achieving their full potential and desires. My greater point was that many such milestones and victories have been achieved in the last half a century, but that the law on selective service still stands as an archaic bastion of the be…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:22 PM
1

It was a metaphor. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-45303069.amp
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:12 PM
1

So they haven’t used it almost fifty years, and yet they still made every man sign the form just in case they needed him to lay down his life for his country. During all those decades of people fighting for equality, demanding that all people deserve the same pay, the same treatment, the same rights, while people were marching, demonstrating, burning bras and changing the views of the nation, nobody managed to change the law that states that men should be sacrificed in an emergency, but do not a…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:22 AM
2

Oh, so the ‘selective service laws have not been in effect for some time’? Has that law been changed? Are men no longer required to sign a legally binding contract that can be enforced at any moment? I don’t live in the US so I wasn’t aware that this law had been repealed. Or do you just mean that the government hasn’t called anyone up recently? If the law hasn’t changed, and people are still forced to sign the documents, then the military still has the option to call on every man in country to …
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:00 AM
2

So the US military permits women to serve, but will not force women to serve. Civilian men however may be conscripted, and must sign selective service papers to agree to this. Is it not patronising to allow women to serve in the military, but then suggest that in the event of a serious conflict you’ll just get the men to come and sort things out? Either they are capable of equal service and should be conscripted, or they are not and should be excluded altogether.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:20 PM
3

The US military permits both men and women to serve, but only men are forced to sign up for selective service. In the event of a military draft only men would be called up to serve against their will, whilst no such call would be made to women. The fact that the US military accepts female soldiers only magnifies the hypocrisy of them not conscripting them in a time of need.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 10:57 PM
3

At the beginning of the twentieth century the suffragette movement was in full swing with female activists using every tactic they could to claim that women were equal to men. At the outbreak of the First World War there were literally posters that said “Women of Britain say ‘Go!’” where the same generation of women who claimed equality suddenly instructed men to go and fight whilst they stayed at home.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:47 PM
1

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 09:36 AM
2

So a woman writes an article telling men how they aught to behave and speak, and uses ‘mansplaining’ in the title. I’m not sure about you guys, but I’m very tired of having people ‘femsplain’ to me how I should act. On the subject of being a man, I think men are probably the experts here.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:01 AM
5

It would be interesting to revisit all these men tomorrow and do a comparison of the gifts they gave versus the gifts they got. It is a little cliché to buy a woman jewellery, but it’s usually well received. Clichéd presents for men, on the other hand, include power tools and slippers. The gender equivalent of buying a woman a vacuum cleaner and an apron. Most women would be happy to get a gift from Pandora, and they don’t sell much that is cheap. I could almost guarantee that most of the women …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:20 AM
2

A share of all his future earnings? On top of the high monthly payment? That’s what seems unfair to me. If you’ve called it quits on the relationship, then you are saying you have no future with that person. So why are you entitled to their future earnings? It seems like that would be an incentive to never earn another penny to prevent a vindictive ex from getting a share.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 11:31 AM
9

Are these the same people that say there is no need for a Mens Rights Movement because Feminism is for men as well?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen13/12/21 12:54 PM
5

You do you buddy. The fact that you have voiced this (and presumably told her) is you giving consent. As long as you are happy with her ‘using’ you without asking first is fine within the limits of your relationship. As you say, some stranger doing this would be problematic, but what you and your partner decide is right between you as consenting adults is fine.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:07 PM
2

Or disguise/hide your face and expose your genitals. Then report the school for child pornography. Is the camera in a place where it can ‘see’ urinals? If so, they may already be breaching the law.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:05 AM
2

Thank you; this is very useful. I shall be looking for this guy’s YouTube channel.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 11:20 AM
3

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506/full “Life-time prevalence of IPV in LGB couples appeared to be similar to or higher than in heterosexual ones: 61.1% of bisexual women, 43.8% of lesbian women, 37.3% of bisexual men, and 26.0% of homosexual men experienced IPV during their life, while 35.0% of heterosexual women and 29.0% of heterosexual men experienced IPV. When episodes of severe violence were considered, prevalence was similar or higher for LGB adults (bisexual wo…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:40 AM
5

I don't support hijacking franchises. Some franchises, like Star Wars, or Star Trek for example, are based on a principle rather than one individual. These work well with having leads who are different races and genders, because they can still make films and programs that are true to the original concept. James Bond however is very much based on an individual; an individual who is firmly rooted in the ideas of 1940s England. I wouldn't support a remake of Beverley Hills Cop movies with Mike Myer…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 11:51 AM
3

Yes they are, and I’d love to watch a film about a black female spy; that sounds great. It wouldn’t be James Bond though. It would be its own great film. It’s patronising to women and people of colour to assume that a film starring them needs to have the ‘support’ of a great franchise behind them. No. They are strong enough to to make their own way in the industry without having to live under the protection of a strong, white, male character. And it insults the intelligence of the general public…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 10:29 AM
17

…except for Lola.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 05:22 PM
2

And that is exactly what an open forum should be like: people who are different and hold opposing views having a respectful and honest discussion. You are very welcome to be here, and your views and opinions are valuable to the community. Today you have opened a topic that has given rise to a good discussion, and I hope that you haven’t been stung too harshly by some of the constructive criticism you have received; you seem to have taken it well. I also hope that the subreddit has taken note of …
/r/MensRights08/11/21 10:57 AM
2

“Being a girl in this subreddit” Just that fact alone is a thing of wonder. Women’s rights subreddits will ban you for simply participating here, and yet they claim to be for equality. Yet here you are welcome and have a post where you can openly use insulting words against the other members, and tell them that their thinking is faulty. As a teenage girl you can post and tell men of all ages how they should behave as men, and get polite, constructive responses. As men we cannot even try to parti…
/r/MensRights08/11/21 10:21 AM
11

Does the ‘split second’ include the time from the point at the front door where the kid told him who was the armed aggressor in the situation? And maybe if you can’t see who is who in a fight, don’t just shoot indiscriminately?
/r/MensRights04/11/21 07:45 PM
6

In every case of wrongly assigned paternity there are three victims. A man who is raising a child that is not his own. A man who is missing the opportunity to raise his own child. And a baby that is going to be raised in a lie.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:05 AM
4

Quote from Cancer Research UK - “There are around 11,900 prostate cancer deaths in the UK every year, that's 32 every day (2016-2018).” Source - https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer#heading-One Maths tells us that 32 deaths a day is one every 45 minutes.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 07:04 PM
12

I had a testicular cancer scare a decade ago. I went back for a few scans and then, thankfully, got the all clear. My then wife, now ex, didn’t come with me to my appointments, and my wider family don’t know it happened. We definitely need to talk more about these things.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:43 PM
41

In the attached article his family describes him as a cancer-awareness advocate. It seems fitting to carry on that work as a way to remember him.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:16 AM
12

What interests me is the thought that men should not hold an opinion because they cannot carry a child. If that were true, then no woman should be telling a man how to be a man.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 10:48 AM
3

“Men not in education : women most affected”
/r/MensRights28/09/21 12:15 AM
3

Most showers have shower curtains, but I'm still not barging into your bathroom with a flippant declaration of my intention to invade your privacy because I probably won't see anything, and anyway, I've seen lots of others before. If a person feels like they have been publicly embarrassed, we have no right to tell them that their experience is 'trivial'.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:31 PM
4

We are approaching that age, but we're not there yet. Whilst there are still urinals it is not appropriate for a woman to enter an occupied men's room. The design of the room does not provide the level of privacy that is expected or deserved.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:20 PM
5

Men have a right to expect privacy. Men have the right to not have a woman wander through a room loudly talking about their genitals when they are trying to use a urinal.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:12 PM
6

Women's bathrooms have the privacy of stalls. Urinals offer no privacy at all. The level of invasion is very different.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:59 PM
4

Unisex bathrooms are fine, but old style men's rooms with urinals offer no privacy at all and should not be a place a woman can enter.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:44 PM
4

In both cases we would just like the right to choose. Suggesting that everyone would like to abort or abandon their children is just your projection.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 01:58 AM
7

Aren’t medicines tested on study groups of volunteers? This could easily be expressed as, “Not enough women are willing to to put themselves forward for drug testing programs.” or maybe, “More men volunteer to help drug trials than women do.” But no, it has been stated in such a way as to make the industry look sexist rather than to make men look more civic minded.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 09:48 AM
15

What other groups was he a member of? Did he drink in a certain pub? Was he a regular customer at his local supermarket? Was he someone who often ate bread? If one dog bites you it does not make all dogs biters. This was obviously a man with serious issues: he killed people. This does not mean that all men are killers, or all British people, or all residents of Plymouth, or all incels. People should stop looking for patterns that are not there.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:25 PM
7

Is our purpose to educate those who hate us? Or is it to offer support to those who are bruised by the harsh treatment they have received? Personally I’m not here to fight. I’m here because I need support. Suggesting that a forum that offers a kind ear and positive advice would simply be an echo chamber or a ‘circlejerk’ completely misses the point that men need support. It’s gaslighting to say that any men’s room is an extremist hate group. When our Reddit support rooms are invaded by people wh…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:08 AM
6

I noped out after number one on the list. A 29 year old saying that men her age don’t get asked about not having babies yet. Yeah. Idiots that rant against biology. The fact is that women reach a point where they can no longer conceive whilst men can usually father children well into old age. I don’t need to waste my time on buzzfeed trash.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:28 AM
2

Imagine the other guy posted here - “my new wife’s ex refuses to pay for his kids! Just because I work hard he thinks I should pay to bring up his child!” How would we respond to him? As I said before, no man should have to pay to raise the child of another man. Not you, not me, not him. That means that we must all take responsibility for our own children.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:17 AM
0

There is no way that you should have to support that woman in any way. However, no man should have to pay to raise the child of another man. You pay no alimony, the new guy takes responsibility for your ex, but you should pay for your own child. Your child is not his responsibility.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:04 AM
1

I feel that the equivalent might be to choke a woman during sex. It’s something that a few people might enjoy, but a lot of people won’t. Between consenting couples this is fine, but if we were being encouraged to “choke all women” I think that there would, rightfully, be questions asked.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 08:43 AM
7

Because they replaced many of the characters within the name with an x to maintain the anonymity of the contributors.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 12:45 AM
29

The article says, “Men are not the only group with declining levels of affection for the BBC.” It then goes on to list the disabled, those from a black, Asian or minority ethnic background, people in the North of England, the working class, under-16s, and the under-sixes as being groups of viewers in decline. Who does that leave? Rich white women in the south - the most privileged elite of the country. I turned off the BBC a year ago and haven’t looked back. It seems that most of the country fee…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 12:02 PM
2

Life drawing models have chosen that activity. That is consent. People who play sport have not consented to have reporters and cameras invade what should be a private space. I agree that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with nudity, but only if the nude person has given their permission to be seen. Nudity without consent is intrusive voyeurism.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 09:41 AM
15

When I lived with my wife we both worked, however my job was 42 hours a week plus a half hour commute each way; hers was 15 hours a week with a five minute commute. I was expected to do a lot of the chores around the house (about a quarter of the cooking, half the vacuuming, iron my own laundry) as well as all the tougher work like the gardening and decorating because ‘she worked as well’. I was paying all of the bills and had no disposable income left. She had a massage every week and met frien…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 09:33 AM
13

Whilst the media pushes the idea that male traits are toxic, and that ‘boys will be boys’ means aggression and sexual violence, the truth is that male traits lead to these kinds of actions. Even at the age of ten a boy is willing to risk, and lose, his own life to protect and preserve the life of a younger sibling. Societal pressures expect men (and even boys) to perform the dangerous tasks to protect others, but then fail to give recognition that these male traits are beneficial. Instead they p…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:32 AM
2

It’s odd that you say you don’t think that she has tendencies toward paedophillia, and then go on to describe her actions that sound exactly like she’s grooming you. You are a thirteen year old gay girl, you describe her as possibly bi, she allows you to read light porn in her class, she brings you gifts, she gives you extra points on your grades, she singles you out for special treatment. Be careful buddy. I think she has a thing for you.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 09:38 AM
5

Shouldn’t our question be: Why are our prisons designed for men and our psychological assistance for women? Shouldn’t both of these be a part of the fight for equality? There are currently incarcerated men who would benefit more from mental health professionals than they do from prison officers, and women walking free who should have been sent to prison for the crimes they have committed. The fact that society is tilted this was is the problem, not the explanation.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 11:05 AM
5

As someone who has spent time in British prisons I can confirm that there were men who did this. But of the thousands of men I saw and interacted with, there were only two who were homeless and came in for some ‘respite’. They were men who had serious mental health issues, were physically filthy, and behaved in an almost feral way. For them prison may have been better that their life outside, in the same way that being attacked by two people is better than being attacked by four. A few years aft…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 10:56 AM
4

How is reproductive labour unpaid? In my UK experience as a father I don’t recall ever getting any financial payments for being a Dad. My wife quit her job whilst pregnant and I supported her financially. She got free dental treatment while pregnant and for some time after the birth. She was paid child benefits by the government until our children left full time education. While we were married I was expected to work full time to provide for her and the children. After our divorce I was still ex…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 09:07 AM
4

Perhaps that's the same society where 8 year old girls are being handed AK47s and forced to shoot their families and become child soldiers. We live in a rubbish world with multiple problems. Let's address ALL of the problems, not just the ones that affect the females.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 10:41 AM
10

It would be similar to claiming that every homicide is specifically a hate crime against men. There are many possible motives for murder; they are not all committed just because of the gender of the victim.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:20 PM
11

“But the murderers are men” - why do you do this? I think we can assume that most car mechanics are male, yet we don’t refer to “men fixing cars”, we call them mechanics, because that’s a more accurate description of what they do, and is inclusive of all the people who fix cars. I agree that most murderers are men, but can’t we just refer to them as murderers? That way we include all the individuals that kill other people, even the small minority of killers who are female, without suggesting tha…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:10 PM
2

Thank you, you are now having the same discussion as the rest of us. You are correct, ‘she got herself pregnant’ is also equally wrong. Nature determines that a pregnancy always involves two people and (unless something very wrong has happened) they both bear equal responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 08:33 AM
4

The question is not ‘how affected each gender is by pregnancy’, it is ‘are women he’d accountable for their actions’. Nobody is going to argue that women don’t have a huge physical input to producing a baby, but the OP is suggesting that phrasing like ‘he got her pregnant’ denies that both parties have equal responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 04:33 PM
7

The law should be, not mandatory tests, but automatic release from payments for any father who has a test and finds that a child is not his.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:18 AM
2

And what the child needs to thrive is to not be in the custody of a child rapist who thinks it’s alright to extort money from their victim. There is nothing here that leads us to think that she is fit to be a responsible mother, and yet she is the one entrusted with bringing up the child?
/r/PussyPass04/05/21 09:39 AM
15

The child and the father are both victims in this scenario. Perhaps our question should be: Why is a rapist allowed to have custody of a child when they have been convicted of a sex offence against a child?
/r/PussyPass04/05/21 09:33 AM
1

Again, thank you for your input. Your experience puts you in a better position than me, and many other commenters, to discuss this issue. Your opinion on this is valuable, and the kind and rational way you put it across is exemplary. Thank you for a good, respectful exchange of thoughts on this. I agree with you that decisions like this should be made on medical grounds and must be an informed choice that takes into account the future thoughts of the baby involved. Peer pressure, whether religio…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:55 PM
6

That is twelve individuals. At the rate per population stated in the study this equates to 2000 men. Do you know 2000 men? If so, then this is accurate.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:46 PM
5

Was this your own choice?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:43 PM
6

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10444134/ According to this study, you were one of the “0. 6% of boys affected by their 15th birthday”. However: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43749/9789241596169_eng.pdf;jsessionid=B9EDA232C91FE9980890972DE56DA22B?sequence=1 “The WHO estimates that the overall male circumcision rate in the states is somewhere between 76 and 92 percent.” Is it worth doing an admittedly dangerous procedure on more than three quarters of male babies just in case th…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:40 PM
3

Thank you for sharing this, and for expressing your feelings. Please ignore all the comments that are trying to discredit your experience because they don’t feel the same way as you do. I am not circumcised, so I cannot compare my experiences to yours, and I would never presume to tell you how you should feel about the things that have happened in your life. That would be rude and unkind. Your feelings and your experience are valid and you are entitled to feel the way you do.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:24 PM
31

You are confusing the 1% of people that are in power with the 50% of people who are male.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 12:59 PM
75

This is victim blaming.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 09:41 AM
3

You’re not being dramatic. Your stand is perfectly fair. If they disagree, perhaps suggest the females in attendance make you a sandwich?
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:00 AM
15

So they are all admitting that they do not feel empathy toward men? Interesting 🤔 https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/why-a-lack-of-empathy-is-the-root-of-all-evil-6279239.html
/r/MensRights29/03/21 10:47 AM
19

Funny, because I recognised it immediately as being based on that. I suspect that you might have too. Yet you say it bears no resemblance?
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:58 AM
7

As an ex-prisoner in UK prisons, I can confirm that there are allowances in the female estate (women's prisons) that are not afforded to the male estate (men's prisons). For example, in a male prison the guards (male or female) can open the hatch to look into your cell at any time without warning. In a female prison they must knock as a warning before they open the hatch, unless they have a good reason not to. This means that female prisoners are given more privacy than male prisoners. You are c…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 05:34 PM
1

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/appeal-search This site lists people who have all gone missing. A simple filter show that there were more than ten in London in the last month. Why is there no mass media search for any of them?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:03 PM
2

It showed a cartoon over several pages that justified women treating all men as potential rapists by making a comparison between men and ticks. It stated that not all ticks carry Lyme disease, but we avoid them all, just in case, and then posited that women should avoid all men because they just don’t know which ones will rape them.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 02:25 AM
12

Using UK stats because...British. The latest figures from The Office for National Statistics are from 2017. There were a total of 121,187 sexual offences recorded by the police in England and Wales in the year ending March 2017. The Population of England and Wales in 2017 included 29,021,253 males. Even if all of these crimes were committed by males (they weren't) and every crime was committed by a new individuals with no repeat offenders (they weren't), then that would mean that 0.4% of men com…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:16 PM
11

Single?
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:04 PM
3

The problem is that 'Feminism' is not a protected term. By law I cannot call myself a doctor or a lawyer unless I have the correct qualifications, but any misandrist can label themselves as a feminist and there is nobody to stop them. There are a lot of hateful, anti-male, political activists out there who disguise themself with the facade of feminism. We would be wise to judge them by their works and call them what they are rather than using the dishonest label they give themselves. 'True' femi…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 02:29 AM
3

https://news.sky.com/story/metropolitan-police-officer-arrested-over-disappearance-of-sarah-everard-12241455 Paragraph after the second photo: “A woman was arrested at the same address on suspicion of assisting an offender and has also been taken into custody at a London police station.”
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:58 PM
5

If 90% of rapists are men, then the other 10% are women. Your suggestion that the other 10% are innocent men is at best inaccurate, and at worst a dishonest attempt to vilify men in general. Which are you: an idiot, or an evil liar?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:50 PM
5

There are two people that have been arrested in this particular case. The man arrested for her murder, and a woman arrested for ‘assisting an offender’. Clearly, in this instance, it was a woman who needed to hold this man accountable and could perhaps have prevented his actions, or reported them. But somehow this woman’s inaction has become “all men bad”.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:38 PM
3

No idea what either of your original messages were, but thank you both for being such civilised Redditors. Nice to see such humility and good manners amongst a sea of vitriol.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:20 PM
52

Also, “you don’t know what it’s like to be a woman” but you know exactly what problems I’m facing?
/r/MensRights10/03/21 10:43 AM
3

I have a theory. Studies should be done to find out how many women live supported by the wages of a man, and how many men live supported by the income of a woman. We could find out if there is a ‘support gap’ that might explain why men, on average, are working longer hours at more dangerous jobs and earning more money. I firmly believe that men and women get paid equally for doing the same job (in most parts of the world) but that men are making choices where they earn more, and women are making…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 10:37 AM
12

“House arrest” is only a curfew. From six in the morning until nine at night she’s free to go about her usual life. This is no punishment at all!
/r/MensRights05/03/21 01:48 PM
4

“He said that 'she was incredibly frisky and that's what got her into all this trouble'” Oh, those peadophiles, they’re just incredibly frisky!
/r/MensRights29/01/21 12:47 PM
2

The fact that this might be her go to word for insulting people makes me think that it was her that added it to the story. I wonder what the guy wanted?
/r/MensRights29/01/21 12:39 PM
3

This man was completely innocent. All he did was show an endearing love for his wife. However , even if he was cheating on her with a younger woman, the correct reaction is not to try and kill him. Red flags!
/r/MensRights25/01/21 10:48 AM
2

And usually the person who says this has no idea what it is like to be a straight white male.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 11:43 AM
1

And whichever 'side' this happens on, it would be completely wrong to invalidate the whole group based on the opinions and actions of a few individuals.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 11:19 AM
3

Sadly, that might be the case.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:28 PM
9

As I understand it, in the past, these gangs had killed male children rather than kidnap them, so it’s good to hear that they are still alive. We can only hope that they can be freed and safely returned to their families.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 07:57 PM
35

This is all desperately sad, but the most heartbreaking line is, “I held it together until I was home alone”. Buddy, we see you, and we feel for you. Those dark hours alone can be the worst of times, and the most dangerous. Don’t give up. Keep fighting. Your daughter is worth fighting for, and so are you. Reach out. We are here.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:26 PM
3

Good work Buddy. I’m happy for you and for your Dad. I too had some treasured conversations with my Dad in the early hours of the morning. They were the best. I miss him.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 07:51 PM
2

Isn’t that exactly what a false accuser does?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:53 PM
2

Wow, will you look at that! An evangelical bot!
/r/MensRights22/09/20 02:54 PM
3

Well, that is an odd perspective from a Christian, but it’s not necessary a biblical view.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 11:33 AM
1

Not even that computer could process multiple things at a time. It was about the year 2000 and it was a fragile old piece of kit.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:18 AM
12

I once worked in an office where the computer used to do a certain task was very old and constantly crashed. This meant that the task always took ages to complete. I was the only man in the office and, in an official review with my female manager, she said, “That task always takes you a long time. Is it because you are a man and can’t multitask?” It was a serious question. I lasted eighteen months before I went somewhere better.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:53 AM
2

It would be an interesting discussion in family court as to what would cause more harm to a baby: living in prison with a convicted rapist and the other associated inmates, or having formula instead of breast milk. Any man convicted of a sexual offence would only be allowed supervised visits with his children, if he was allowed to see them at all. It grates that a woman who has produced a child by raping a minor might be allowed to keep that child in a prison environment rather than losing her p…
/r/MensRights14/09/20 05:36 PM
2

The UK law is different. The husband won’t be forced to pay for this child.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 01:24 PM
4

If I were this boys parent I would be fighting for full custody of my grandchild with a restraining order against the mother / rapist.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 01:21 PM
5

In what other field would we just take someone’s word for it on an issue that large? It’s a commitment of 18 years that is going to cost you thousands, and it’s based on the word of one person with no request for a single price of evidence. In fact, the other party can be calling it all lies from the start, and they still take the word of that one person. Making it normal practice to test will save so much heartache, prevent fraud, and, if it happens to everyone, stop people feeling that it is a…
/r/MensRights12/09/20 06:45 AM
1

I miss this kind of advert. It’s happy and feels like home. Nobody is made to look an idiot, and it shows genuine love and cooperation within a family.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:05 AM
8

Even better! Start discussions about how unhygienic this is and demand that proper facilities are installed immediately. If they want to talk toilets, then make it the biggest issue you can.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 05:20 PM
72

There are lots of replies here that discuss the mathematical amount of times it should be left up, or the political reasons, or how this is discriminatory. All of these are correct. However, hygienically the best answer is to close the seat and the lid before flushing. Droplets of toilet water can contaminate the cubicle and your clothing if this is not done. Therefore you should become the new toilet monitor and loudly deride all who not close the lid, for health and safety reasons. This way al…
/r/MensRights08/08/20 08:12 AM
1

Any single person who lives alone does all this for themself as well as earning a living and maintaining the house, car, garden, and getting all their groceries, cooking, cleaning, laundry, etc. It’s called ‘being a grownup’ and you don’t get special credit for it.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:48 AM
7

This is very positive. I’m impressed.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 07:28 AM
8

Whilst I like the sentiment of your statement, I don’t think it would be mathematically possible. For women to be 55% of everything, they’d have to be 55% of the population, or there simply wouldn’t be enough of them to fill all the posts. If they were 55% of the population they would then claim that it was perfectly correct for them to hold 55% of the posts, and to achieve your position of making them look entitled, you would have to make sure they held 60%. This would then have to continue unt…
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:41 AM
5

Surely the investigation team should have done gunshot residue tests on everybody to see who fired the gun. The initial version of events would mean that this guy shot his ex’s lover and then stood there and waited while an injured man moved over three meters toward him, picking up a hatchet on the way, and then turned his back so that the guy could hit him numerous times. It’s just not plausible!
/r/MensRights17/06/20 10:17 AM
10

No. I'm going nowhere. We didn't spend millennia working on The Patriarchy just to hand it over to you. You're just going to have to set up your own society that is separate and unique. We look forward to watching the utopia of the Matriarchy as it grows without any male input. Good luck!
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:48 AM
1

It was that easy. Here, take my money.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 07:52 AM
3

"A victim impact statement was furnished to the court in which the mother was described as traumatised." ​ She is not the victim here. The article makes it clear that she 'had sought the circumcision' and arranged it. She wanted this done and paid a man to carry out the procedure in her own home, not at a hospital. No mention is made as to how traumatised this ten month old child is, or the physical and mental scars that he will carry with him for the rest of his life. The fake Doctor is obvious…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:19 AM
1

Personally I believe in equality. I think that all people should have the vote, depending on certain conditions. They should be law abiding citizens of the country, who are willing to take up their responsibility toward that country. That's it! It shouldn't be based on gender, or religion, or wealth. During WW1 There were law abiding, lower class men who were literally willing to die for their country, but they didn't have the vote. This was wrong. There were also law abiding women who were will…
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:43 AM
2

Voting is what puts the politicians in place. The politicians decide whether to go to war or not. You could vote for a politician who would or would not send you to fight in a foreign country. Many of the soldiers who fought and survived the war may then have something to say about the leadership of the people who sent them to do that. Giving those men the vote enabled them to choose whether the politicians who advocated war while staying at home should be the people to continue lead the country…
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:13 AM
6

Suffrage is a right. With rights come responsibilities. One of those responsibilities is the defence of your nation. The posters of the First World War literally said, “Women of Britain say ‘Go!’” And the suffragette generation handed white feathers to men they thought should be fighting. I do not hate women. I hate those suffragettes and the things that they did. They were perfectly willing to physically attack politicians, destroy property, commit arson on religious and civic buildings, send b…
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:51 AM
9

Had to zoom in. I didn’t initially see the blue line at all.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:48 AM
28

Fun fact: in the UK around 40% of the men drafted into World War One didn’t have the right to vote either. The Suffrage Act of 1918 that allowed some women to vote for the first time (without the responsibility of having to fight in a war) also allowed many veterans to vote for the first time too. Those men ‘paid’ for their suffrage with their blood and the lives of their brothers. Whilst the women obtained their right through civil unrest and terrorist methods.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:34 AM
5

I'm sorry that nobody was there for you when you needed help the most. I hope that you, and your Dad, are coping better now.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:46 PM
11

True. That is a part of my question: Why are people more likely to donate when a woman is involved? For female donors it may be solidarity. They may be less likely to give to a male. But isn’t that sexist? For men it may be that they see women as more vulnerable and think that men shouldn’t need charity as they should just sort their problems out by themselves. But isn’t that sexist? A lot is said about men’s rights, but society doesn’t put it’s money where it’s mouth is. It seems that all peopl…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:49 AM
9

Also, a 15 year old is a child. Social services will immediately take a child into care to place them with a foster family. We all pay our taxes so that they can do this, so why do we need a charity to do the same job? Conversely, a twenty year old has far fewer options and is in much more need of our help.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:00 AM
13

I agree with you, no 15 year old should be on the street. Indeed, no adult should either. However, with over three quarters of the people living on the street being male, this organisation must have gone out of it's way to specifically choose a female to highlight in their campaign. Also, they are a gendered organisation; they have the word 'Men' in their title. When a charitable body that was founded to help men, takes the effort to specifically highlight a story about a woman, who is in the mi…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:55 AM
11

With bonus points for the advert because it vilifies a man. There is a YWCA (Young Women's Christian Association) that works exclusively for women, so why does the men's association feel that it too needs to work for women too and not focus on the needs of men? In the UK, where the YMCA was founded, the Patron is The Queen and the Chief Executive is also a woman. Is there anything that is by men, for men, that women don't want to take over and change to their own benefit? Or is the advert simply…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:23 AM
62

Judge Neil Flewitt, QC, who viewed photos of the wounds, said: "They're not terribly serious injuries as luck would have it." So the judge dismissed the injuries as not that serious when the victim was literally stabbed through the hand, and attributes this to luck, therefore admitting that the intent had been to cause serious injury, but that the woman was just 'lucky' that she didn't do more harm. His own comment adds weight to the argument that there was intent to cause serious bodily harm. W…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:56 PM
8

Why is there just an arbitrary award for being female? Is this the same in other countries and could it be the reason why outcomes for men with illness are statistically worse than for women?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:03 AM
2

We don't laugh at stuff that we see too often. That's why reposted jokes don't raise a laugh. In any public place you will see the majority of females wearing traditionally male clothes. It's mundane and every day, so we don't laugh. A man in a dress is out of place and strange. The strikingly unusual site makes us feel awkward, and we laugh.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 12:32 PM
2

What is France showing us in this map? Either they lost as many women as men in the war, or they hardly lost any men. Are we looking at the deaths of female resistance fighters, or the cowardice of French soldiers here?
/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:42 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:03 AM
8

My post was an invitation to all to join voices in protest. You obviously don't want to accept that invitation. I'm not here to debate with you; we need cohesion, not division.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 04:57 PM
4

Thank you for sharing your opinion. Sometimes the only way to get across an important message is to keep pointing out a problem. Some people may think that you are annoying, or petty, or being "a dick", but eventually, if enough people point out all the petty inequalities, perhaps those in authority will start taking notice. Are you using a slang word for penis as an an insult? That doesn't seem like a very positive thing for men's rights. Do you mean that I'm being 'petty'? Petty means little o…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 04:30 PM
1

Men do not have to fear groping? That may or may not be true. However, women do not have to fear being wrongly accused of inappropriately touching people on the train. An innocent man who is wrongly accused on an overcrowded train stands to loose his reputation, his job, his family, and his freedom. The anxiety of this threat, along with the chance that he may be physically attacked by other commuters if he is wrongly accused, could seriously affect his mental health. If women are afforded the d…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:59 AM
86

Thank you for this good reminder. I wish the best to all those women who are not represented by the vocal minority who make us despair. It's good to remember that most women (indeed, most people) do not prescribe to the outlandish ideas promoted by the lunatics out there. 99% of them are our loving family, partners, and friends who want the best for everybody and we wish a happy International Women's Day to all of them.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:34 AM
49

The only way to make them care is to show that we care about it. If you care then join me in sending them a message. It would take the same amount of time as it took you to comment here and, if enough people do it, then maybe they will start to care.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:06 AM
45

You're right, one person's voice is meaningless; that's why we all have to send them a message. I've done my bit and you can do the same. It would take the same amount of effort as it did for you to comment here.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:03 AM
25

However the Google Doodle will recognise any little historical event they please, regardless of whether the UN have set it aside as a special day, so Google could do the same for November 19th, they just choose not to and use the UN as their excuse.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:50 AM
10

Welcome to the club guys. I got banned for asking what we could learn from the Scandinavian prison system. They just hate all men and ban us for existing, not for what we say.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:31 PM
3

So who was the advert aimed at? There are a minority of people who are sexist, but do you think an advert will make them change their ways? So was it aimed at the majority, who are not sexist? If it was, then it was a mistake to imply that they might be sexist, and it is not their job to go around converting any sexists they can find. What does the advert want us to do? Surely it should have been made with the aim of making us buy Gillette razors, but it only succeeded in annoying half the popul…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:50 PM
3

You are entitled to your opinion, the same way that those who are offended are entitled to theirs. I was offended by their message. What offended me most was they felt they have the right to dictate the actions of half of society. Personally I find it very presumptuous of Gillette to offer me unsolicited advice on anything other than shaving equipment. What right, or what credentials do they, a company that sells overpriced grooming products, have to tell men how to act or how to bring up their …
/r/MensRights27/01/20 06:00 PM
4

This was my favourite line.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 11:55 AM
298

#mentoo Another article on this points out that men are less likely to have reported the attacks. We must accept that men can be vulnerable too, that there is no shame in being victimised, and that we need to watch out for each other. This horrible person has hurt so many people, on such a regular basis, over a relatively short period of time. Women are very good at having each others backs, and men are very good at making sure women get home safe. However, because everyone is equal, we need to …
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:43 PM
1

Because there are people here who are denying that women can be in the wrong. There are people that won't admit that there is more to 'a fight' than a physical hit and, because a victim is male, they are belittling the emotional, social, and psychological damage inflicted on such victims of domestic violence. We do not make any excuses for violence. Being angry, being provoked, being drunk, being tired, or being confused are not reasons to resort to violence. Neither is the fact that your victim…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 09:42 AM
2

If your definition of brutal is purely to do with physical damage caused, then you may be right. If you include the mental assault that goes along with a beating, and the ongoing effect on the life of the victim, then the brutality inflicted has the capacity to be fairly equal. Your assumption that one is 'significantly more serious' ignores and belittles the damage done to men because it is psychological and social rather than physical damage. Often the mental trauma and the damage to ones repu…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:31 AM
2

It is less of a question of "would you rather fight a man or a woman?" And more a question of "would you rather fight someone who will hit you back, or someone whom society has conditioned not to hit you and, when the fight is over, that person will be burdened with the blame for the fight, every onlooker will take your side, and you will be able to choose how severely they are punished and how often the fight will be brought up in the future, and the fight could cost them their home, their job,…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:46 AM
1

I can see your point, but I wonder if this is a gendered issue for you, or merely one of size. What if you had a younger brother with the same dimensions as your partner? Would you be equally reticent about hitting him? Or what if your partner matched you in body mass? Would that make you more likely to hit her in self defence? Whilst most of us lean toward "equal rights mean equal fights" I think we also all adhere to the older adage "pick on someone your own size". In this, I think that your i…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:29 AM
3

What percentage of those rapes happened on trains?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:17 AM
2

And what percentage of these rapes happen on trains!
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:15 AM
10

I would happily ride in a male only carriage. Less bags on seats, no choking perfume, no glares from entitled princesses that think they deserve my seat. Sounds like a perfect journey to me.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:12 AM
3

"The term “emotional labor” was first coined in 1983 by sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild to refer to jobs that require people to manage the feelings of others at the expense of their own." Are not men raised to suppress their own feelings so as to protect those around them? The 'jobs' of being a husband and father require us to bury our own feelings, needs, and fears so deep that we struggle to ever bring them up again from the depths of repression. And if we ever do show these feelings it i…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:41 AM
3

He should have quickly followed up with "Hugh Mungus Intellect" and ask why she would immediately make it sexual. The sexual element was all in her mind!
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:45 PM
5

Will they also only buy their electricity from female run power plants? How do they feel about their toilets connecting to male built sewers? What gender are their security guards and night watch?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:40 AM
2

Who will provide the childcare? Will there be enforced quotas to ensure an equal hiring process in the female dominated industry of childcare?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:40 AM
2

Thank you for sharing this with us. It's important to feel that there is somewhere that you can talk and show emotions, and we are privileged that you chose us to tell about this. Many of us are fathers, and some seldom see our sons any more. Hearing your heartbreak makes us reconsider our own situations and realise that we are not facing the worst, as you have. You give me, and others, the strength to carry on, and I hope that our support does the same for you. You sound like a fantastic father…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 06:13 PM
3

Whilst her sarcastic and condescending tone are annoying, I think we should take her at her word. The same groups that encourages women to take up stem fields should also push them into these dangerous jobs. Equality in the boardroom should also mean equality on the factory floor and in the coal mines.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:30 AM
3

Perhaps researching why the gap is there would be a start. At the moment nobody cares enough to even question it, and that in itself is a gap.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 10:51 AM
1

I agree with the point you're making and may use parts of this in future discussions. However, I don't see why IMD has to be good for women. Whilst there may be incidental positive side effects, this is not the point of the day. We do not need to justify the day by highlighting its effects on women; the fact that it is good for men is justification enough. I also struggle to see any good effect that the equivalent Women's Day has for men.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 09:32 AM
4

"there will always be an earnings gap over the course of female lifetimes" Have you taken into account that the average female lifetime is longer than the male one, the female is likely to draw a pension for longer, and the fact that a female spouse is more likely to receive a life insurance payout due to death of a partner? This may well cancel out any time taken off for pregnancies.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:18 AM
5

Iago's speech from Othello states, "Good name in man and woman, dear my lord, is the immediate jewel of their souls. Who steals my purse steals trash.........but he that filches from me my good name robs me of that which not enriches him, and makes me poor indeed." Despite his title, money, and position, this man was robbed of his reputation. There is nothing that can insure us against a false allegation. One word from a liar and our lives fall apart.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 09:20 AM
1

In the UK the age of consent is 16. However the law stipulates that you cannot have nude pictures of people under 18. We have heard of cases where 18 year old men have been arrested and charged for having pictures of their 17 year old girlfriend. These pictures were taken by the girl, and she sent them to her boyfriend. He did not share them with anyone, but, when arrested or searched for an unrelated matter, the police have found the images and prosecuted. However we are yet to hear of a female…
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:50 AM
2

I actually paid her an extra hundred a month. It was still a better deal than I expected, and it made sure my son was comfortable.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 04:13 PM
13

When my ex wife first kicked me out I still paid all the bills for a while. Our adult daughter still lived with her, and our teenage son stayed with her in the week, but with me at weekends and school holidays. After a couple of months I proposed an offer that would cut my payments from about £1,000 to about half that. It would mean that she would have to pay her own way (she was working) and our adult daughter would have to contribute to the home too. My wife was not happy with this and went to…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 09:37 AM
3

I expect the wonderful relationship with your girlfriend is because you are a good guy. You seem like a caring and thoughtful person who takes your responsibilities seriously and takes others feelings into consideration. We, the strangers of Reddit, respect you and care about your situation. However things work out, please come back to us to let us know that you are safe. Do not blame yourself for this situation. The fault lies entirely with her.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:58 AM
1

So you are suggesting that there is a conspiracy of employers to issue different job descriptions to people of different genders doing the same job, and that this conspiracy is large enough to have skewed the earnings of millions of people across several continents? Wouldn't the rule of Occam's razor suggest that perhaps women are just working for less time? In fact, you point to this suggestion yourself when you say that many leave work because of childcare issues. The fact that women are repea…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:32 PM
3

I am a middle aged man living in the UK. Since before I was born it has been the law in my country that you cannot pay a man and a woman different wages for doing the same job. A similar law was enacted in the US under President Kennedy, so even longer ago than the British law. I'm sure there are similar laws in other countries. If anyone feels that they are being paid less than others for doing the same job, they can call down the force of the law on their employer. Equally, if anyone is stoppe…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:14 PM
2

People tend to view the world from their own perspective and judge others by their own standards. If you were use this article as a window into the mind of a feminist you will see how they view relationships. Women dehumanise men, use them like toys or tools, treat them as sex slaves or wage slaves, and do not care about their feelings or emotions. That is why, when faced with sex robots, their first thought is that men will treat them in the same way that a woman would treat a man. However, thi…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:44 AM
1

My mother outlived my father, and both my grandmothers outlived my grandfathers. All of my aunts have outlived my uncles. And thinking about my wider community, I have known far more widows than I have widowers. There will be anomalies in the statistics of course, but averages worked out over many millions of people usually hold true. So in most couples the man will die first.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:34 AM
1

The OP on the post addresses this. Apparently, at the age of 60, there is still a difference of three years in life expectancy.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:27 AM
1

The OP on the post points out several times, quoting relevant statistics and sources, why these types of deaths are insignificant when measured against the total deaths in the US.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:25 AM
10

That's a lot of texts. It works out at about one every thirty seconds, on average, day and night for two months. That's relentless.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 09:03 AM
1

Not very diverse.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 09:06 AM
3

Also, on the different outcomes for divorced men and women, there is no mention of the changes in living conditions. A divorced man is likely to have lost his home, suffering the stress of finding somewhere new to live and setting that up, twinned with the fact that this will undoubtedly be a step down from his old home and may require physical work to get it up to standard. He will probably have to work longer hours to support his now ex wife and any children, as well as the covering the cost o…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:48 AM
7

Shouldn't they be called more insulting names like incel or virgin?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:22 AM
2

Exactly! I hate it when people don't consider the 'emotional labour' of single people organising the logistics of their personal life. Apparently that's only a thing for one half of all couples.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:20 AM
6

I spent almost a decade working Admin in various schools. For one of those years my boss was a man. For the rest of the time, my line managers, bosses, and headteachers were all women.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:33 PM
6

Open heart surgery is also perfectly legal, but if I attempt it at home using kitchen tools I'm going to face some serious consequences.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:36 AM
79

Why is this such a public event? There are issues of cleanliness with people standing around gawking like that, let alone the dignity of the patients victims. One sneeze from one of those grinning idiots and the young boy could die of an infection.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:22 PM
8

New precedent from the High Court: " historic discrimination against men " It's official recognition that that men have been historically discriminated against, presumably by the 'Patriarchy'. How does this fit with the idea of male privilege?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:03 AM
3

Perhaps the men are dying at a younger age because they had to work until they were 65. Equality of retirement age may mean that we see an equalising in life expectancy, or it may be that the type of work is what is killing the men younger and we won't. It will be interesting to see the figures in years to come regardless.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:00 AM
4

Seems like someone trying to steal my karma.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:57 PM
2

He should also go to hospital to get his injuries checked out.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 08:07 AM
9

The Purge has begun.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 07:21 PM
21

The famous Act of Parliament in 1918 that gave the vote to women also gave the vote to the 60% of men that weren't able to vote until then. It was felt among politicians that these men had 'earned' this right as the majority of men who died in the First World War were not permitted voting rights. The suffragettes, on the other hand, had waged a reign of terror between 1904 and 1914 to fight for this right. This included arson attacks on churches, public buildings, and private homes, a letter bom…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:55 AM
2

It seems like a lot of people are putting forward the argument that women's business attire is harder to source. Surely this is a problem of "if you build it, they will come". Men are now wearing more waistcoats than they used to and, do you know what, more places are selling them. I think that if more women started wearing appropriate office clothing then the shops would quickly start stocking it. However, since the shops know that many women won't buy these lines, but would rather wear 'fashio…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:07 AM
3

In the same parlance then, the vast majority of suicides are male as that is a similar numerical split. On a side note, I am really growing to hate the BBC.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 08:18 AM
8

"Based on our own figures from an oddly specific time period" hmmmmm
/r/MensRights14/09/19 07:51 AM
1

James Bond is a male character, invented by a male author, who has been played by a series of male actors. Miss Marple and Mary Poppins are both female characters, invented by female authors, who have been played by various female actors. We don't have Martin Poppins, or Mr Marple, and we do not need Jane Bond! Iconic characters should be left as they are. If you want a film about a female spy with a licence to kill, then get a female author to write one.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 07:23 AM
3

Equality means that a woman can do anything that a man can do.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:53 AM
1

One hundred thousand.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 09:15 AM
5

When the monthly payment is made through the court, and the money makes its way to her bank account, she could simply transfer some back to him, or send an envelope with some cash in it with the kids. You are right, the courts can be stubbornly heartless, but people can get around that if they really want to.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:00 AM
6

Many movies are violent or promote stealing, however they are just movies. Usually the actor is not violent or dishonest in real life. What offends me personally about this movie is the fact that it portrays something that one of the main actors does in real life. Normally thieving rapists are not given a multimillion dollar platform to promote their lifestyles.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 08:13 AM
2

Wow. How can a subreddit that actually declares itself to be against people's rights not be banned for being hateful?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:19 AM
1

Never mind that, he will be reminded of this every time he uses the bathroom. He probably suffered from PTSD, and that's even if he survived. Did they have antibiotics in 1908? He ran the risk of infection every time he urinated until this healed.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:37 AM
8

But thank you for bringing it to our attention. It's beautiful.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:28 AM
-2

If this is in the female toilets then I see no reason for it to mention male genital mutilation. Equally, most male victims of this are too young to read. In general, I do approve of this sign though, I expect it is a very necessary service for many victims of the crimes mentioned.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 09:41 AM
3

If all three 'wrongs' apply to each of the twelve individuals that would be 36 in total. I think this well and truly puts her in the wrong.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:52 PM
2

And what entitlement! Going public with your name and photo and saying that you have committed fraud in this way. They are very sure that there are absolutely no consequences to their actions.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:35 PM
2

Even if she has no intention of doing this, if she looses her job and tries to claim any form of benefit, the government will withhold any payment to her until they have taken the name of the father and chased him for child support.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:34 PM
6

My favourite part was the police lineup. She pointed him out! What an idiot.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 07:51 AM
1

The comment, "everyone knows how indiscriminately sexual she was" sounds so creepy.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:13 AM
7

Whilst this may be true, is it fair that in the same environment a man is expected to wear a suit and tie? Why do half the people have inflexible restrictions as to what they may wear, when the other half have almost infinite options, and the right to state that they "should still be respected in their job" no matter how inappropriately they dress? Nobody is suggesting that women should be sexually harassed for what they wear, but neither should men be made to wear restricting and uncomfortable …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:22 AM
3

I just want to give him a hug. He seems like an OK guy who had some simple and realistic goals.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:03 AM
1

Sara Gilbert goes up in my estimations for speaking out here.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:18 PM
1

She claimed that he "threatened to hit her". She did not say that he actually followed through on that threat so it is very unlikely that he hit her. He made it clear to her that he did not want sex. It seems he had to go so far as to threaten physical violence to dissuade her, which would suggest that her advances were repetitive or ongoing. . He did not follow through on this threat because he's not an animal. Instead he went and locked himself in the car. Compare this to how many times a man …
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:45 PM
2

Also, think of the entitlement of the girlfriend in this situation. She called the police in full confidence that they would back her up, even when she admitted the reason that he had locked himself in the car was because she was demanding sex. A man demanding sex would be considered a predatory sex pest, however a woman doing the same knows that she has the full backing of the law, and social norms, behind her.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:35 PM
2

All the more reason not to cut off the protective sheath of skin that nature gave you to protect them then.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:42 PM
2

Are you suggesting that normal people wear shoes, but wander around with their genitals on show? I think it might be just you that does that.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:39 PM
3

Is that your intelligent and logical response to my argument?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:30 PM
4

True. And if I were to rip off all your fingernails then you wouldn't get dirt trapped under them either. Seems like an extreme response to a very minor issue to me. As someone who has owned a foreskin for my entire life I can confirm that keeping clean does not require a strenuous routine. I live in the western world and my penis is about level with the sink in my bathroom and, in the bath or shower, my hands are naturally very near my genitals. Frankly it is more awkward to wash my feet, but n…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:56 AM
2

So if you're going to rob an old person you can either punch them in the face and grab their money, or you can con them into handing it over. Obviously it's going to be a violent act if you hit them, so does cheating them make you a better person? Later, when they realise that they have lost something valuable, feel stupid for falling for the lies, embarrassed that they didn't stop you, and experience a loss of dignity and self respect because of your actions, do you think they'll find any solac…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:51 AM
6

This is interesting because it shows a similarly between being rich and being female. Everyone accepts that being rich equates to being privileged, but then claim that being female means you're oppressed. This evidence shows that being female affords you similar privileges to being rich.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 06:35 AM
110

When I'm on the London Underground I count bags. A lot of men have no bag at all and some men have one bag. Very few men have more than one bag. It is the exact opposite with women. You hardly ever see a woman without a bag, they all have at least one, whilst many have two or more. It's not at all unusual to see men standing while women have a bag on the seat next to them. Who is really taking up all the space?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:14 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:01 AM
13

https://menssheds.org.uk/
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:03 AM
1

Oh. I was thinking of the one in Northern Ireland (I'm British). Was there an American one too?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 01:39 PM
5

Did you assume their gender? /s
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:42 AM
3

Just going to pop that cake shop situation on the table here for you all to consider. You know, the one that was back and forth through the courts because a Christian shop owner didn't want to make a 'gay cake'.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:37 AM
2

And he shouldn't be forced to pay anything ever again. He now has the ability to make a fully informed choice in this. It's not that the child doesn't deserve the money; he is suing the woman because she doesn't deserve the money. The only evidence we have is this article. It states that he is suing the wife and demanding that the boy be told who his real father is. Based on this fairly neutral evidence you are assuming he's a terrible human being and I was positing the opposite view to yours. T…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 06:45 AM
2

You are pointing out that it would be inhumane to raise a child for eight years, and then walk away without looking back. We all agree with you. However, nowhere in the article does it suggest that this man is doing that. You are accusing him of this based on absolutely no evidence. This man, and the child, are the victims here and you are pretending that one of them is evil for no reason and based on no evidence.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:20 PM
2

Why do you think he is abandoning the child? The article does not say this is what is happening. There is every chance that he is still in constant contact with the child who he has raised and loved for almost a decade; he appears to be working hard in the courts to get justice for himself and the boy. And yet you are accusing him of being a heartless person who is abandoning his son.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:16 PM
2

Does anyone remember the 80s sitcom 'My Two Dads'? I think that the husband and the father should move in together and raise the boy between them.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:03 PM
7

Again (because I've replied to other posts in this thread) where does it say he's cutting the boy out of his life? Why are you assuming he'll do that? He seems to be fighting for justice, for himself, the child, and the real father. He is obviously angry with his estranged wife, but the article gives no reason to think that he is abandoning the child, or that he doesn't feel, and show, love toward him.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:18 PM
4

Poor kid. Poor husband. Poor real father. The woman is a life ruining, fraudulent, liar who deserves whatever bad consequences she receives.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:09 PM
3

No. He is fighting for justice. Justice for the boy is knowing who his real father is. Justice for the real father is the chance to know the truth and connect with his son. Justice for the husband is to be repaid for all the money that he was conned out of through emotional manipulation and outright fraud. Justice for the woman is that she must repay the money she stole and work to repair the devastated lives of her son, her husband, and her lover by finally telling the truth.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:06 PM
2

What makes you think he's rejecting the son? Nothing in the article implies this. It says he's demanding that the boy be told who his real father is, but it in no way suggests that he is abandoning the child.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:59 PM
5

And, as I've pointed out to several commentors already, there is nothing in the article to suggest he's not putting the child first in all this. It says he is demanding that the boy be told who is real father is, which seems like fighting for justice for the child. It could well be that he is still a father figure in the boy's life, providing the love and support that he always has, but those comments make it seem like the authors automatically assume that a man would not act with kindness and l…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:57 PM
8

But he's not though. She has lied for the best part of a decade. She has toyed with the emotional wellbeing of her husband and her child. She has denied the true father years of a relationship with his son. The man here is showing no animosity toward the child, he is suing the mother, and rightly so since she took his money under false pretences. For all we know he is still a father figure to the boy with a strong presence in his life and is fighting for justice, demanding that the child he has …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:30 PM
6

To be fair the article never mentions the mans attitude toward the child. He's suing his estranged wife for his costs and demanding that she tell the boy who his real father is. For all we know he could still be in the boy's life as a father figure and is fighting for justice for both himself and his 'son'. It is likely that, because of her own actions leading to this case, the mother will deny him any further access to the child. I see three victims here: the child, the man, and the true father…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:24 PM
1

Should be like food stamps: provided free or subsidised for those in financial crisis, but not for those who can afford to pay.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:13 PM
3

David Bowie used to get paid millions when he sang in front of people. I once sang karaoke in front of people, why didn't I get paid millions? We did exactly the same job!
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:20 PM
4

I'm assuming (just because) that the mother has the majority of custody. This father must accept the decision to stop (even though it's perfectly innocent), but he would also be completely within his rights to request the exact same behaviour from the mother. Use the mother's own weapon against her and highlight the inequality that the lawyer is enforcing.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 07:41 AM
2

You are doing the right thing and we look forward to seeing your update about this being successful. I'm sure that you and your son have a great future ahead of you and he will be much better off with you and have a safe, stable home life. You can do this.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:24 PM
2

Bart and Lisa (and Maggie)
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:41 PM
1

The bus driver.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:09 AM
6

My only question is this: why did her husband take her back? She's an unemployed sponger who continuously runs up credit card debt and took off to live with another man for three months whilst still taking money from her husband. He should have cut her off and changed the locks.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 08:11 AM
11

English TV show. A bit like Jerry Springer or Maury. Deals with people who are trying to resolve family issues, but in a sensationalist way. Usually dealing with the lower echelons of society.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 11:51 AM
2

So many people listing serious psychological issues about commitment, sex, and relationships and then immediately saying that their experiences have had no effect on them. They can't even see how being sexually assaulted has caused them such terrible, ongoing pain.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:13 PM
1

I sometimes ride the tube. Like most men my age, I experience pain if I sit with my knees together, possibly similar to the pain felt by the woman in the video when her leg gets knocked. I noticed that the woman was seated, and had other women seated near her, whilst the majority of those standing were men. I also notice, when I ride the tube, that you seldom see a man with more than one bag, but that it is quite common for women to carry two or more. These bags are frequently placed on seats ne…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:14 AM
1

Did you notice that even though he was a douche, he was the one all the women wanted to talk to?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:15 PM
1

was it https://www.youtube.com/user/divafleur13 ?
/r/MensRights14/04/19 10:10 AM
1

What do we think of the fact that she can make unfounded accusations with no evidence and be believed, and he has produced solid evidence to back his claims? ​ 87 videos and 17 witnesses is not a 'he said : she said' situation. That is cast iron proof!
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/19 08:01 PM
3

And, in a system where it is commonly claimed there is insufficient money to investigate crimes, the British tax payer is funding these witch hunts. I'd rather my money went to catching real criminals, not pursuing wild goose chases.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:01 PM
1

And is she still shadow minister for domestic violence?
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:01 AM
140

I'd be interested to hear his side of this story.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:40 AM
3

I'm a middle aged white man. Every single one of those women earns more than I do now, and more than I ever earned in every one of the jobs I've ever had. They all earn more than my Dad ever did and more than any of my three brothers ever have. I bet I can go to my local town centre find sixteen men like me before you can find one man like the guy in the article.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 11:24 AM
1

It's from The Daily Mail, a British newspaper.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 10:37 AM
1

Yes. Before the 1918 act of parliament only 40% of men had the vote.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:11 AM
6

Hmmm....does #NotAllMen include 'not all men could vote'? Here in England women got the vote in 1918 and this was much celebrated in its centenary last year. What was not much mentioned was that the act of Parliament that allowed women to vote also gave the vote to millions of men who were previously excluded. Before this act only 40% of men could vote.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:15 AM
2

I liked her before I saw this; she is kind, funny and down to earth. She has just won even more kudos points in my book. Not afraid to call out the double standard.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:46 PM
1

I too agree that movements shouldn't bully, and neither should companies. OP has every right to do as they choose, that's their freedom. I can see their point that it is wrong to try and force others to take the same action as you based on your moral choice; that's an issue for their conscience, not yours. Personally I have decided to boycott Gillette, but I won't be picketing their factories, destroying their property, or even advocating that anyone else joins me in my boycott. However, I am co…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:39 PM
3

If you were a company that cloned biological matter from stem cells to use in facial cosmetics, would you call the matter foreskins? Either it is foreskin / was cloned from foreskin, so that's what they call it, or they decided that the best way to market beauty cosmetics to women was to fraudulently claim that it was made from baby boy penis clippings. Which option is the most sickening?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:26 PM
12

If comic book action heroes promote masculine men then we also need to take Barbie away from our daughters.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:45 AM
1

Sorry, I'm not disagreeing with you, but with the terrible judgement of the 'Judge' in the appeal. I think you and I have exactly the same opinion on this case. Sorry for any confusion.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:17 AM
10

By saying that it was "morally unacceptable to regard a child as a financial liability", this Court of Appeal Judge managed to bring into question the morals of the father in her official judgement. How is it acceptable to victim blame in your judgement?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 09:06 AM
6

Does conceiving without his consent constitute rape? Also, I have serious questions for the hospital that allowed her to go through the process to get pregnant without ever seeing the father. Surely he should have been present to discuss the procedures. He should sue for full custody of the child and demand financial support from the mother.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:51 AM
3

I can't understand who is down voting you for this. Who is disagreeing with unilateral nonviolence?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/19 09:27 PM
2

Oh my goodness! Surely, for the children's safety you should have been given full custody and she should have been heavily supervised on visits.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/19 09:07 PM
2

If being weaker did justify a woman hitting a man, then the same logic would justify anyone hitting someone stronger than them. You can now fight anyone who looks bigger, stronger and tougher than you, and they are not allowed to hit you back? Doesn't sound right to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/19 09:05 PM
3

Of course they do, it's the BBC. A few months ago they had a female journalist and a female anchor discussing prostate cancer. It's never about men on the BBC.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:28 PM
1

I don't think that's her. I think that's his selfie from 65 miles away that proves he didn't do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 09:46 AM
2

Yeah, ok. He had options.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/18 06:52 PM
5

He's investigating a crime. A hit and run, or failure to stop at an accident, is often indicative that a driver has something to hide. Perhaps they're drunk, or don't have insurance, or the car is stolen. He has every right to ask her questions and he had cautioned her of her rights. She then calls him 'honey'. He asks her not to do that. She responds by telling him not to talk to her at all. At that point she is not cooperating with a police officer. She may be trying to hide a crime. She has a…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/18 02:26 PM
6

The article repeatedly refers to 'badly raised' men. It would be interesting to know how they define this. Do they mean 'raised in a single parent household without a positive male role model'?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:05 PM
1

The 'henpecked' husband trope is as strong as ever. This is, and always was, emotional abuse, yet it is considered to be comedy.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:02 AM
11

100% of the people in the UK are female, or know someone who is. Who was it that said, "there are lies, damned lies, and statistics"?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:37 PM
2

Probably something to do with the frequency of the risk too. A pilot will make as many flights in a week as the average person might in a year. If you do something more often you are more likely to fail at it. And a pilot only needs to fail once.....
/r/MensRights07/09/18 08:21 AM
1

Do Mums still go to Iceland? This got me thinking that I haven't heard that slogan recently.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 08:34 AM
0

I don't mind discussions, but questioning my sobriety is just trying to undermine me and is avoiding the issue. You state that you felt ready to have sex when you were younger than the legal age, so you feel that it might be ok for an underage person to consent, and this is your context, however it does not change the law. The law in England says that sex with a person under 16 is statutory rape. No context can change that. If a 13 year old felt confident enough to drive on the public roads woul…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:09 PM
0

This happened in Wales, under English law, where both are called rape and both are very illegal. You are suggesting that an illegal act against a young male is ok because it would be viewed differently in your country. However in this country both rape and peadophilia are illegal and culturally despicable, no matter who the victim or the perpetrator are.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:35 PM
11

That does not make it ok.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:26 PM
4

There were two underage boys involved. How many would it have to be before you'd class her as a serial rapist? And are paedophiles only bad if they're violent? She is a sex offender by name, because she committed sexual offences against vulnerable minors.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:24 PM
1

Let's be clear: being molested by another person is not a reflection of your own sexuality. You were asleep, and in no way a willing participant in this. Set these two matters very far apart and don't let them cloud each other. Being touched by your uncle does not mean that you might enjoy being touched by another man; equally, being touched by a man who you feel sexually attracted to and by mutual consent does not mean it's ok for your relative to initiate uninvited sexual contact. Threaten you…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:39 PM
18

The article is about not sending women to prison. In order to do this the Government is suggesting spending money on centres for women so that they can serve their sentences in residential centres. The cost of this is to be drawn from the funds already allocated to prisons in general. I think this article is about unnecessary spending of prison funds to benefit a minority of people, rather than using those those funds in a way to benefit the entire prison estate. What is your opinion on what thi…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:17 PM
288

Britain's prisons are overcrowded and the Government seems to only care about the 5% of inmates who are women. Their estate is already newer, better cared for, and has better facilities than the male estate. They are already sentenced to shorter terms for identical crimes. They already have more provision to see their children than the men do. The figures prove that female offenders are more likely to reoffend on release. Don't you think that could be because prison is less of a hardship for the…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:16 AM
3

"What's your name sweetly? I've got this all on camera. I'm going to put it all over social media." Literally the last thing this shoplifter wants: her name and face all over the Internet when her behaviour shows that she's guilty as hell. If you're innocent you just walk back inside, empty your pockets and show your receipt. If you're guilty you throw yourself on the floor, make a huge fuss and try and get away.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:33 AM
2

"Ladies first" - everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:27 AM
3

Six monthly review at work in an all female office. A certain piece of equipment was outdated and slow causing problems when it constantly crashed. They pointed out that using this machine was taking me longer than usual and asked, "is it because you're a man and can't multitask?"
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:26 AM
1

And isn't there an element of selection involved? If all the men you date are idiots it doesn't mean that all men are idiots. It indicates that the smart men know better than to date the likes of you.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:04 PM
3

The line that gets me is : But she said the #MeToo movement also is a great time for men "to rethink what it means to be a man". Why must I rethink what it means to be me? Are women rethinking what it means to be female? If I'm getting 'being a man' wrong, how does a woman have the right to tell me how to do it better? If I were to tell a woman to be more / less / a different female, then I'd accused of making 'make me a sandwich' type comments. Can we accuse Salma of the same thing?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:19 PM
1

Knife throwers assistant?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:22 PM
18

Isn't t lasting longer a sign that they have lost sensitivity?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:36 PM
2

I think the Australians are getting this right. The information is good, helpful and gender neutral. If I had to be picky I'd note that the men's helpline is not a 24 hour service, but at least it exists and is advertised along with the women's one. I especially liked the button to quickly close the page; this could prove very useful to some vulnerable users.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:07 PM
1

Does anything deserve physical violence?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:56 AM
1

Cartoon also references a French song, so perhaps the creators experiences were just French? In doesn't strike me to be a British thing, from my life experience.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:29 AM
2

Thank you. I guess I'm probably just triggered by my own issues. I appreciate your input though, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:28 PM
1

Thank you, nice analogy. I've not heard that comparison before.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:04 PM
7

Oh, I saw it! In a short introduction she said that she had already posted it to a men's rights page and was pleasantly surprised at the positive response she got. She found the community to be welcoming and respectful of her and her opinions. The video then went on to give advice on how women should talk to men. It stated that people generally respond in like manner, so if you pass by a man and give him a 'death stare' as if he is a degenerate, he will probably be inclined to treat you as if he…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:21 PM
1

In most of the western world most politicians are middle aged white guys. But then again, so are most of the rubbish collectors. Call someone to unblock the sewer and, guess what, it's likely to be a middle aged white guy. However your doctor, the local social worker, the staff at the bank, your child's school teacher and the person checking your stuff at the supermarket are likely female. Is the drain technician more privileged than the supermarket worker? Is the rubbish collector more privileg…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:48 PM
2

Hey Buddy, thank you for this. You're providing a solid service here.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:03 PM
3

And of course the death gap!
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:59 AM
1

Oh, OK. I see from your post above that you feel that it's more to do with men working harder, for longer hours, over a longer career. I agree that this is a large part of it and that women are more likely to take career breaks and retire earlier, often to be supported by a male. For all of these reasons, yours and the articles, it is pointless to trust in one simple published percentage and make accusations of gender bias. If women are approximately half of the population, but are collectively …
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:10 AM
1

I agree, it is a myth, and this article gives some evidence for why. It explains about the Royal Estates employing vast amounts of men for cheap manual labour, whilst the upper management posts are female dominated, hence their figures show a female advantage. Conversely, a female clothing chain is run by men, but the army of part time sales staff is almost entirely female, so their figures show men being paid more Neither organisation is discriminating due to gender, but the basic statistics gi…
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:52 AM
2

The article talks about which companies have reported large and small discrepancies in their figures and discusses why this may be. It's good because it is a level headed piece that appears to be written with very little bias. It talks about those industries where men appear to be paid more, but also those where women are vastly ahead, including the Royal Estate at Windsor.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 08:20 AM
4

Clearly that's equality to you, because in your mind: Feminism = Man Hate Therefore Men's Rights = Woman Hate You will see a plethora of hatred for men in any number of subreddits that claim to embody equality, and if you frequent those sites then you will see hatred for 'the other' in any post you read. If you dismiss any issue raised as 'WomensHate' then you will never understand the issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:23 AM
7

Interestingly I served time in a UK prison and have discussed this in depth with other inmates. Even some prisoners think that, if a person is sentenced to longer than ten years, they should then have the option to choose the death penalty. I was inside for less than two years and I can confirm that there were some pretty dark times when I considered my options, so to speak. Several people that I chatted to and knew quite well chose to end their lives rather than continue in prison. Don't believ…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:40 PM
1

I love the fact that her Dad has seen the footage and sides with the Police. He says they showed more patience than he would have done.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/18 11:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter