AhmadMansoot Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
19	Being very Intelligent made a potential mate less attractive. Kindness and Physical Attractiveness did not Well low substance abuse is also positively correlated with being a life long virgin and longevity isn't gonna get you laid either. The highest income is also found in slighty above average IQ people not high IQ. Education is also becoming less correlated with IQ. That's the issue.High IQ in and of itself just isn't attractive. And the less outstanding you are compared to the average person, the less benefits a high IQ is gonna give you. And you need to keep in mind that when someone says that t…	/r/BlackPillScience	21/01/26 01:37 PM
26	Being very Intelligent made a potential mate less attractive. Kindness and Physical Attractiveness did not High IQ isn't attractive. The results of having a high IQ in a survival situation are. But in a civilized society where everyone can survive you're stuck with just high IQ	/r/BlackPillScience	21/01/26 11:28 AM
10	What kind of women do rich men generally marry? It boils down to rich men just marrying whoever they want. They don't have the issue of not earning enough money. They can afford to have a private coach and workout 5 times a week, eat healthy food made by a personal chef and ofc get cosmetic surgeries so they have it way easier to improve their looks. And they can travel around and meet a lot of of new women instead of being confined 40 h per week to the same people. This just makes it way more likely to find a woman that is your exact type th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/07/25 02:04 PM
6	It's bad when people try to justify women preferences with morality or connecting their preferences to being a good human being. The more often you see a person the more attractive they seem to you. That's why people fall in love with friends. They weren't attractive enough to fit the threshold for relationship when they met but after a couple months or years they finally go over the threshold and suddenly they realize how good of a partner they are.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/07/25 08:04 AM
6	What’s stopping you becoming more attractive? That's good. Never do leg lengthening. You will never be able to jog, run or properly jump again after that surgery	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/25 01:42 PM
0	Men cannot complain their way to sex and relationships Go ahead name the anti mass immigration policies supported by the majority of super left wing people	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 03:19 PM
1	What are some of the good things you see in dating profiles? Something that makes you seem like a human being that actually wants to build a connection. Too many people try to be nonchalant in their profile. And having either a pic of a hobby or mentioning one in your bio is good. An actual hobby, not doing vacation in Bali, eating food or borderline alcoholism. Something like vacation somewhere not a lot of people go to, cooking and not just eating at a restaurant and being a hobby somelier. Nothing wrong with being basic just try to wrap it up nicely. O…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 03:07 PM
1	What are some of the good things you see in dating profiles? What would you consider an actual bio? I'm always at a loss what to put in without it either being a boring list of facts about me or it being cringe because I try to write something funny but my humor just doesn't suit that format.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 02:58 PM
-2	Men cannot complain their way to sex and relationships Reading isn't your strenght innit? I already mentioned immigrants in my first comment and all of a sudden it's "insane" to refer back to them? Anyway being super left wing, like all those women that find conservative views unattractive, means unconditionally supporting immigration from super conservative countries and never integrating those people. You basically just abolish your own political views in a few generations. What if you don't want that? Well that's a conservative view somehow and w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 02:45 PM
-3	Men cannot complain their way to sex and relationships Yeah I agree we need to take in more super conservative people from non western countries so we can finally abolish women's rights. What do you think immigrants like me do here?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 01:37 PM
6	Men cannot complain their way to sex and relationships I live in a major western city and without exagerating every 4th gen z women's profile on dating apps contains something like "you need to be a feminist" "I hope you're more than just a little bit left wing" "I can't shut up about patriachy" "lets hate capitalism together". And those are just the obvious ones. Gen Z women are insanely politicised which makes dating in major cities very hard if you have even a whiff of slightly conservative leaning political views like when you have an immigrant …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/06/25 01:18 PM
5	Study finds out body count truly matters in both genders Sure there are gender differences but the general trend is still there. A man with 5 premartial partners isn't as likely to divorce as a woman with 5 premartial partners but still more likely than a man with 3 or 0 premartial partners. In men a gene mutation has been indentified that strongly correlates with poor relationship outcomes. Cheating also runs in families. So I assume that there is a strong genetic component to your ability to pair bond and keep up long term relationships. While other…	/r/BlackPillScience	26/06/25 11:02 AM
39	Study finds out body count truly matters in both genders Exactly idk why people don't get that. People who are good at forming and maintaining long term relationships and aren't cheaters will by necessity have fewer sexual partners than people who can't form long term relationship, can't hold them for long and thus jump from one partner to the next quickly or people are cheaters. So all of that "many premartial sex partners predict divorce" talk is just a correlation even tho many people try to spin that into a causation.	/r/BlackPillScience	25/06/25 04:03 PM
2	Why do you think women are less attracted to men than men are to women ? Are women less attracted to men than men to women or are they attracted to less men than men are to women? I think a lot of people mix that up. If a woman sees a guy she considers an 8 or higher she's gonna be similiarly down bad for him like a guy who sees a woman who's an 8 or higher. It's just that the amount of men that women consider to be attractive is far lower than the other way around. (I'm only talking about attractiveness not sex drive in general) And that can be explained with: for w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/06/25 01:11 PM
1	Women lie about their "low" standards and the bar in hell 4000 years ago some slaves in Egypt decided that humans are above animals and now we have people claiming that humans aren't subject to genetic hardwiring on sexual selection like literally every other mammal but that attraction is some ethereal, highly individual thing.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/05/25 03:03 PM
16	Men are judged for pretty much any perceived lack of independence, but women are allowed (and sometimes encouraged) to be independent at their convenience You call you friend/ relative that you have agreed with to drive you to the hospital in case uber and taxis won't drive you, because you had 9 months and longer if the child was planned to figure out how to get to the hospital since both of you can't drive.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/25 09:30 AM
4	“Men are looking for clean water in a desert while women are looking for clean water in a swamp” is the most misandrist analogy I ever heard They literally do mean the good guys too and are gonna treat them worse accordingly	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/05/25 04:33 PM
3	When mothers murder their own children, they are charged less seriously than other forms of homicide. This is because women are babied by society. Women get lighter sentences for the same crime in general. That's just the natural extension of it. Rape as a crime is also gendered in many countries to punish male perpetraitors harsher than women. In Great Britain you can't even rape someone if you don't have a penis. So female rapists by default get lower sentences and then the pro female bias gets added on top.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 08:38 AM
1	There is nothing society nor anybody else can do to make any given individual more attractive to another. The answer is in the individual themselves. Would've the poor guy be more attractive if he were rich? That's the whole argument. If you're a 6 and sitting in an expensive car that could push you to a 7 and suddenly women want to date you. But if you're a 3 you're just an ugly guy in a fancy car. And if you're a 10 in a nice car you're gonna see just how down bad women can get. Wealth isn't the most attractive quality but does make you more physically attractive with more meaning increase over your current state not more in general.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/05/25 02:12 PM
0	There is nothing society nor anybody else can do to make any given individual more attractive to another. The answer is in the individual themselves. Sitting in an expensive car quite literally does make men more physically attractive on a scale from 1 to 10 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19302732/ Bc that's how nature makes us pick a mate. Physical attraction. Simply seeing a person more often makes them physically more attractive. Your attractiveness is based on your looks but your objective looks aren't the full story.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/05/25 02:42 PM
-2	There is nothing society nor anybody else can do to make any given individual more attractive to another. The answer is in the individual themselves. Sitting inside an expensive car makes men physically more attractive to women. And I don't think there's anything particular about cars that makes men physically more attractive. Maybe women seeing men and thinking "money, food" does in fact makes them more attractive. Because literally how otherwise would you get women to mate with guys who are rich if being rich wouldn't make them more attractive. Stone age people didn't think about who to have sex with. They just fucked the most attractive pe…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/05/25 02:18 PM
2	There is nothing society nor anybody else can do to make any given individual more attractive to another. The answer is in the individual themselves. Beauty standards are a thing you know. Like society quite literally telling you what is attractive and what not. Same with personality traits. Living in a culture that views extroversion as better than introversion is make most people consider extroverts as more attractive than introverts. Having a big belly is sexy if it signals wealth but ugly when it signals laziness. Who decides what it signals? Society does. Are male virgins attractive? Well if we'd praise male virginity as much as we used …	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/05/25 01:08 PM
–	The resentment for women will grow drastically in years to come That's 80% of men. Good luck with society then	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/05/25 01:40 AM
3	Being alone and sexless doesn’t even compare to having to have sex with somebody you don’t want to have sex with Yes, but what is your point?	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/25 02:57 PM
4	Being alone and sexless doesn’t even compare to having to have sex with somebody you don’t want to have sex with The existance of having sex with people you don't consider hot enough just to have sex and not be sexless alone disproves your claim. All of that pain and trauma is literally not as bad as being sexless bc why would you do that if not having sex would be better. Women do that to not be sexless. It's that bad.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/05/25 01:47 PM
4	Females, you're not single because a lack of quality men. Its because you're not pretty enough to get a rich one. It is looks don't let people fool you. Many rich men that can't get a gf or hookups. Almost no poor hot guys that aren't successful with women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/05/25 02:28 PM
2	Q4M: Would you date a woman who took "How to talk to men" classes? As a disclaimer I'm autistic so my view on social skills might severly differ from the average guy. But I would not care about that. I had to consciously learn those things too so I don't judge. I would even see that as green flag since it signals a growth mindset and the ability to recognise flaws/ areas where she isn't good in and willingness to improve. In the end I only care if we can effectively communicate with eachother and it doesn't matter how or where we learned that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/25 04:50 PM
10	Hey PPD! What is an unpopular opinion that you are thoroughly convinced is true about modern dating after many years? I think the 80/20 rule is true for short term stuff. Like most men will get rejected when asking out a girl either by cold approaching or shortly after meeting her. It's over time and with more exposure that women "warm up" to most guys. Dating apps just mimic cold approaches where you only judge based on looks and since we have hard data from dating apps that's where we found that rule.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/25 09:38 AM
1	Orgasm The projection is insane.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/25 06:23 PM
0	Orgasm Almost all actually men do care. I've literally never met a guy who doesn't get turned on and desperatly wants his partner to orgasm. Stop making shit up	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/25 02:18 PM
0	Orgasm Now ask yourself why women keep fucking guys who don't care about them instead of the 90% of guys that desperatly want their partner to orgasm. This or women don't communicate their needs properly. Most likely both.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/25 02:17 PM
-15	Orgasm And women don't want sex from men or what? Women are sexual creatures too and whe can and should expect them to take agency in their own pleasure. If they are fine with just being a pillow princess then fine but don't complain if you don't get what you want out of just lying there. If you want something, do something. There are tons of ways women can either make themselves orgasm during sex or help the guy make her climax. But how many women actually do that everytime they have sex instead of ju…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/04/25 12:42 PM
7	TV show Adolescence gets the pipeline completely wrong I need to rewatch then. I got the feeling they implied that he's into incel ideology but admittedly I wasn't paying too much attention while watching.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/04/25 12:23 PM
20	TV show Adolescence gets the pipeline completely wrong The boy isn't ugly, isn't severly neurodivergent and he has friends. So he's not an Incel but somehow he is into hardcore Incel ideology? That's like a black white supremacist.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/04/25 12:17 PM
1	"Chad" is less likely to be misogynistic than a sexually inexperienced man: A study found that the more sexually experienced a man is, the more biased he is towards women. Saying you like women and believing women are only good for having sex don't mutually exclude themselves especially if you like having sex. If we go by this study https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.13062 "We did not find sufficient support for a relationship between gaming and hostility towards women, and there was no support that loneliness, rejection, or romantic partners predicted hostility towards women among a general sample of men. Our study supports right-wing authoritariani…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/04/25 07:42 AM
22	Prostitution should be legalized As a German is can say yes to that. Prostitution won't be an option for getting your sexual needs met as long as it is stigmatized. 100+ years ago it was seen as normal that a man visits brothels but now it's seen in a more negative view. But sex work doesn't fix the need of some men to "seduce" or "conquer" a woman (even tho that's bs). And as already stated it won't fix the issue of a lack of a romantical relationship.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/04/25 03:31 PM
3	Women who had toxic relationships when they were young and immature were not that different from sad virgin men. How are consentual relationships "abuse of power"? Way too many people seem to think that women don't enjoy sex and only do it to get a man to commit when that's obviously not the case. If a woman wants to have sex with an attractive guy why blame the guy for sleeping with her then? And were does the overly controlling come from?	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/25 04:51 PM
4	Women are largely correct in complaining about the average quality of men as romantic partners. There are thousands of women lusting over serial killers and mass murderes. There are thousands of erotica books written by women and read by millions of women that basically depict sexual abuse and rape against. Women are the main watchers of porn with violence towards women. The percentage of women being into dominated is significantly higher than the percentage of men wanting to dominate in bed. So at what point does despite turn into because?	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/25 03:27 PM
3	Women are largely correct in complaining about the average quality of men as romantic partners. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks women want. We see that women date those guys at such a rate that women believe that the average guy is like that. So clearly there is something that makes women want to date those guys. Otherwise they simply wouldn't.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/25 03:20 PM
7	Women are largely correct in complaining about the average quality of men as romantic partners. Women go out of their way to date the worst guys just bc they're hot and then blame every guy for it who just wants to be a good person. Always amazing. Attractive men are way more misogynist than the average looking guy so keep that in mind when women talk misogyny in men. Women dating attractive men is just a reverse of the normal men want women and women can choose. Now the guy can choose and suddenly the whole gender is awful.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/25 12:25 PM
2	CMV: Objectively, unless one’s circumstances are worse than Godfrey Baguma’s, there’s no excuse. CHANGE THIS VIEW. Don't you think there are at least 2 women in Uganda that are into that kind of deformities? The average deformed guy would never meet them since they're rare af. But a world famous guy would have it way easier getting to know the 2 women that have that weird type of kink. Being famous extends your dating pool so much that if there is anyone into your specific weird issue will be included in your dating pool. The average ugly person doesn't have that luxury	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/04/25 12:48 AM
1	CMV: Objectively, unless one’s circumstances are worse than Godfrey Baguma’s, there’s no excuse. CHANGE THIS VIEW. No sane woman would date a man who's favourite past time is killing and then raping women. Only a few thousand women in the whole US would probably do that so if you're average women killer is out there looking for dates these women would likely not meet him. But if the guy is broadcasted to the whole nation then every not so sane woman will knoe of that guy. That's the big difference. Just like dating apps broaden your potential dating pool, being famous does too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/04/25 12:42 AM
4	CMV: Objectively, unless one’s circumstances are worse than Godfrey Baguma’s, there’s no excuse. CHANGE THIS VIEW. Ted Bundy got thousands of women lusting after him. The average guy is never gonna have a date with a woman if she knew he killed 10 women. Almost as if being world famous makes it easier to find the 5 women that find you attractive despite your obvious flaws.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/04/25 09:44 PM
2	Is it a red flag for a guy to have a high opinion of his ex? Mindblindness theory is outdated is getting replaced by the double empathy problem. The issue isn't that autistic people have inherent social deficits but that autistic and non autistic people communicate differently and things "get lost in translation". Non autistic people are just as much to blame for the miscommunication as autistic people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/04/25 12:14 PM
3	Debunking severe misconceptions about men, thats perpetuated online. I made the experience that round about half of all people who read what I write just ignore all the nuance so only absolutrs is just how some people's language comprehension seems to work	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/25 07:30 PM
2	Men aren't approaching women due to a lack of social skills, merely because they are taught not to. The majority of men literally do that all the time. But what even is your point? Men who don't care about women harrass women even tho they don't want that? Like yea that's common sense. But women blame all men for this and the wonder why the good men stopped talking to them. That or you just like horrible men and that's why you're around them all the time	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/25 01:20 PM
9	Men aren't approaching women due to a lack of social skills, merely because they are taught not to. Maybe women have a different perspective but from my experience it's the nice men that feel pressure to not be creepy which puts a barrier between them and asking women out. Sure they can still do it but it's usually not comfortable and the chances of success are basically zero so why bother. On the hand every guy who is a cheater, player or straight up sexually abusive has no issues with aproaching and asking out women bc they don't care about women and their wellbeing.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/25 09:35 AM
12	Men aren't approaching women due to a lack of social skills, merely because they are taught not to. No good men don't want to bother women and won't ask them out if they hear that might make them uncomfortable. Only people who don't care about how they make women feel don't feel called out bc they never cared about women in the first place	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/25 09:07 AM
1	Women need to be choosier than men Then you still need to control that. Monogamous marriage as practised in patriachies solves both of those issues. You could come up with another system but you still need to impose a system on people	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/04/25 05:45 PM
2	Women need to be choosier than men Well my point is that a you literally cannot build a society beyond a certain level without some form of coercion. Just bc it would be nice doesn't mean it true. We're still animals and never evolved to work for as long as we do in civilised societies. So what is the argument that a coerscion free society is possible? Bc I would really like that but I just don't see it being possible.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/04/25 03:26 PM
1	Women need to be choosier than men The only way to read a threat into anything I've written is by just making things up instead of taking the words as written. So please just for one minute assume I'm arguing in good faith and either 1: give me an alternative to patriachy that can uphold the same level of civilisation as we currently have 2: refute my line of argumentation that goes like this: Society needs a certain level of organisation and effort and social cohesion on large scales to achieve a higher level than tribe with som…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/04/25 03:03 PM
2	Women need to be choosier than men I don't want to return to the 1800s or enslave women so I'm always open for better alternatives.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/04/25 02:37 PM
-2	Women need to be choosier than men I think we need to come to terms with the fact that in abscence of strong patriachal systems where women are basically forced to marry a man, a lot if not most men will never have success in dating. We know from genetic evidence that every human has double the amount of female ancestors than male ancestors which suggests that as in other species only a select few men reproduce. This should also start a discussion about the value of those patriachal systems bc if half of your male population are …	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/04/25 02:28 PM
1	One of feminism’s biggest weaknesses is the reluctance to hold toxic voices accountable because doing so might 'validate the enemy' That's a "weakness" of every political group and also doesn't happen bc every group has infighting over people being either too radical or betraying the cause.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/04/25 04:56 PM
2	Thoughts on emotional intelligence and money as coexisting value propositions to women Please read the "validity" section here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_intelligence to learn that EI is in fact not widely accepted within scientific research which is the only field that matters. There are way too many valid critisism of that concept of EI, to just call it widely acceped even if that is the case in pop sci. One of the major points is that a common test for EI is basically just measuring conformity	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/04/25 09:28 AM
4	LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD I've once heard that no plus size model has a double chin and now I can't noticing that all plus size models have a "normal model" face instead of a "plus size face"	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/04/25 01:01 AM
1	Men do not understand value "Value" is literally just a post hoc assignment based on attractiveness i.e. looks. Nothing more than the halo effect. That guy looks good so he must be high value. That guy is ugly so he must be an incel loser. It's that simple.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/04/25 09:24 AM
-1	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. You'd need to define those factors first and then research if they actually impact war. As of now I don't think there are any strong factors that would make war more likely that aren't subjective like feeling threatened or a strong will to claim one's claims even by war. And now the real kicker: the actual size of the sample size doesn't matter if you compare teo sets. The significance of the results is more important. You either know this bc why else would you throw word like confounding variab…	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 08:11 PM
-1	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. You're arguing in bad faith that's the down vote. You'd bring out confounding factors for men so why here? Or are you gonna argue that higher male crime rates are mainly due to confounding factors like less education, more likely to experience violence during childhood, more likely to be homeless, etc? Bc if yes fair game. If no bad faith argument	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 05:34 PM
-2	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. 70 to 80 depends on how you count. That's big enough of a sample size. You point? Ah nothing I though so	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 05:17 PM
16	Why don't more men advocate for better male contraceptive options? I don't wanna say that it would never work but feminists always just disregard the scientific fact that fertility in men and women works differently and men don't just come with a no fertility mode like women do. Almost as if they just wanted to hate on men for no reason	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 04:59 PM
9	Why don't more men advocate for better male contraceptive options? "Mild" side effects is one of the biggest man hater lies in medical science ever. Scientists know what the side effects of female contraceptives are and aren't going to end studies on male contraceptives if they have similiar side effects. The side effects of the male contraceptives are way stronger and occur more often and that's why the studies end. Not bc men can't take side effects. Maybe just maybe it's hard to develop a contraceptive pill for a body that hasn't an ingrained "no fertility" …	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 04:56 PM
1	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. Throwing away data that doesn't fit your wanted redult is proper scientific conduct according to you? What are you a sociologist? That study is just build around data manipulation and anyone can criticise that. But it's good to know that 1 you have absolutely zero clue what you're talking about and are just driven by opinion 2 you don't even know how a logical argument works It's good to know that people like you disagree with me cause that shows me I'm doing something right	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 01:33 PM
1	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. proceeds to quote that one bs study Anyway hunter gatherers hardly have any hierarchies nor private property. Some do own a little bit more than others but usually any surplus is gifted away. People don't enjoy more power or influence based on their sex or gender role. And no form of labour is valued over another as all are important for survival. So how is that not egalitarian?	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 01:17 PM
0	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. Please forward that to your local university. They would love hearing about you coming up with a completely new theory on hunter gatherer societies. Or you're just quoting that one bs study where all the data that didn't support the authors opinion was just not included. Anyway you are blatantly incorrect except if by egalitarian you mean literally 100% equal. Hunter gatherer societies are by far the most egalitarian societies that have ever existed	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 12:11 PM
-1	The patriarchy is good. Every single successful society in history has been patriarchal, and non-patriarchal societies are doomed to fail. So do more egalitarian hunter gatherer and early agricultural societies. They might be even more war mongering. Also insert fact that female monarchs in Europe started wars at a higher rate than male monarchs. So I don't see any reason to assume that they things you listed are inherent to patriachy. You're just conflating technological progress over several different civilisations with the social structure of a single society. And yes all of those societies did become more egalitarian over time.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/04/25 11:52 AM
1	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is Yeah sure Ted Bundy was famous for his social skills. That's why so many women wrote him letters about wanting to marry him. And you could say well that's just a small minority of women. And you'd be correct but a minority of women is still plenty opportunity if you know where to search. Also most of your social skills are based on your looks anyway. If people want to talk to you, you literally just need to be average at conversations and people will eat up anything you say. Same goes for men wh…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 06:53 PM
1	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is Tinder works perfectly fine for attractive men. Idk what 18th century education you're on but women are sexual creature too with sexual desires that aren't tied to relationships. High sex drive women are real that fuck any good looking guy and women who just want to have fun with some chads are real too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 04:11 PM
1	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is They do lol. Have you ever been friends with a chad? They're on dates every one to two weeks with a new girl. Women are just as easy as men if the looks are good enough	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 04:09 PM
3	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is I've heard from women that bumble and hinge are better bc there're less fuckboys on those apps. But could be regional differences.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 04:06 PM
1	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is Just bc you don't want that doesn't mean a ton of other women don't too. Tinder is literally a hookup app. People are on tinder to fuck. Yeah maybe they want a date before that too but that's just to set the mood for fucking. And you don't even need that. I know several guys who's tinder dates are: girl comes over to their place, they have sex, girl leaves again.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 01:33 PM
5	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is No attractive men literally just put their pics into Tinder, select "looking for something casual" and start swiping. They'll get matches left and right that they can choose from and almost all of them are just looking for sex	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 01:18 PM
7	If a guy wants NSA sex he has to go to where NSA sex is Tinder works perfectly fine for physically attractive guys. They get enough matches and dates to have NSA sex with a different woman every week. Tinder is literally THE NSA hookup app for heterosexual people and most women who want NSA hookups go on Tinder to get that	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/03/25 12:57 PM
1	Best way to approach Being socially adept is gonna increase your chances by exactly 0%. You should train that with friends and to a lesser extent collegues not random women. You can be super weird and still pull if you're attractive enough. Rizz em with the tism like people call it (they do NOT mean actual autism just being weird and exccentric). Also if you're not being socially adapt there's most likely something wrong with you and you should get that adressed first or else you'll just be creepy guy and run into w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/03/25 05:47 PM
2	This subreddit is all about statistics until it makes men look bad. It's not even about admitting. In several countries the legal definition of rape is chosen specifically to account for men raping women. So women raping men would be counted as sexual assault or "forced to penetrate" instead of rape, scewing the rape statistic in favor of women. It's still way more men commiting rape but the gap is significantly closer than people want you to think.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/03/25 01:25 PM
8	This subreddit is all about statistics until it makes men look bad. As far as I've seen stats women in the younger generations are "catching" up to men in being assholes and stuff. Like women are sexually harrasing and assaulting men more and more in younger generations when back in the days those crimes used to be almost exclusively commited by men. More gender equality does come with weird side effects. Which is sad to see that the development goes into the direction of more violence and misbehaviour instead of less	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/03/25 01:21 PM
3	Do dating apps work for women I think the biggest issue with dating apps is that you match with "random" people instead of meeting through friends or hobbies. Bc in the latter case you already have something in common or are at least somewhat similiar personality wise if you share friends. But on dating apps it's just a random person with nice pics and maybe a good bio. So even if you match you most likely don't share much with eachother which makes forming a relationship.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/25 11:45 PM
–	Why long-term abstinence might be harder for non-virgins than virgins A variation would be that a poor person suffers less from being poor than a former millionair who partied all his money away. Or a starving child in Africa is suffering less from starvation than someone who always had enough food until he got lost in the wild and is now starving.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/25 05:57 PM
–	Do looks stop mattering after a certain level of attractiveness? I'd even say it's exponential till you reach 10. An 8 is gonna be way more well regarded socially than a 7. But a 6 although noticable isn't that much of a difference to a 5. As long as you are in the "average" tier you don't get much out of your looks bc that's regarded as neutral. But once you start moving into hot or ugly ranges the attraction or disgust starts to really manifest	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/25 10:48 AM
6	Dont say “Choose Better” and then get mad at picky women with high standards. Indian scammers are super obvious but elderly people fall for them all the time too. Both things can be true. Abusers and scammers are pretty easy to spot if you know what you're looking for so they exploit the people who aren't looking. And sure there are some super good scams and some super covert abusers but those are exceedingly rare. I don't expect women to sniff out abusers during the first date although a lot of them should put you on guard even during the first date like when someone is …	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/03/25 04:47 PM
5	Why do red pillers continue to push the sperm is better than uteruses argument? Red pill men start with men not having any value outside of what they contribute to society. That's why they're so obsessed with status. And sadly there's a lot of truth to that. As a man you hardly get appreciated for anything but what you can do without complaining	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/03/25 03:40 PM
6	Dont say “Choose Better” and then get mad at picky women with high standards. You can spot a lying predatory jerk from 10 miles away so yes women consciously choosing those men instead of literally anyone else or just staying single is 100% women's fault	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/03/25 03:26 PM
9	Women truly do not care if you’re unattractive like you think we do. It’s truly about confidence and charm…. The issue is that confidence (unless you made active efforts to cultivate it) is strongly tied to looks since if you're attractive you'll get way more positive feedback in social interactions, which boosts your confidence, which boosts your attractiveness, which boosts your confidence, etc. Sure an average looking guy can be super confident and charismatic but he needs to be more of those than a good looking guy and it's harder to cultivate those things for an average guy. And confidence is more…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/03/25 05:27 PM
1	Can hypergamy include factors other than economic status? That's also my thought. Women aren't selecting for intelligence but intelligence increases a man's chances and abilities to get an attractive socio-economic status and thus intelligence is indirectly selected for. But in a society where you don't need intelligence to amass a good socio-economic status we'll see less intelligent men with wifes/ girlfriends	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 10:09 PM
0	The best way for men to weed out the inauthentic women is to get separate orders on dates. But where does the expectation that a money earning adult shouldn't pay for their food come from? Would you date someone who expects you to pay for them simply because they showing up? That's just an outdated gender role from the times when women weren't allowed to open a bank account without her father's/ husband's permission. It needs to die just like the any other outdated gender norm	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 11:05 AM
1	The best way for men to weed out the inauthentic women is to get separate orders on dates. Where is that a social expectation? Outside of tax deductable business meetings I always have to pay for my food when getting invited to eat together. It's also really convenient for women to make the person who's asking the other out pay well knowing that women almost always expect the man to ask them out. That's basically a thinly veiled "men have to pay on dates"	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 09:43 AM
21	“Women may have it easier in dating, but that’s not the most important thing” - yes it is. Yeah I never got that "women have it easier getting to know people, getting dates and have more people interested in them but it's definetly harder for them to find a good relationship bc if you ignore the majority of men who want a relationship then you'll left with a lot of men than only want to fuck." Like a woman just needs to weed the bad ones out while a man needs to even get a date and then still needs weed the bad ones out. This logic hinges on women being inherently better partners than…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/25 09:12 AM
46	CMV: "women are less likely to date bisexual men" is just an attempt to frame us as homophobic "A 2019 study published in the Journal of Bisexuality titled “Swipe Left on the Bi Guys” pretty much sums it up. The researchers concluded that heterosexual women tended to rate bi men as less sexually and romantically attractive, less desirable to date and have sex with, and less masculine compared to straight men. A 2023 study by the LGBT dating app, Taimi, involving around 3,000 bi users, showed that 92.2% of bi men feel they encounter significant difficulties in relationships with straight w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/03/25 03:36 PM
–	Autistic women are not "better at masking" I often wonder how much of women's supposed advantage in social skills and integration into social norms are actually just the women are wonderful effect at work combined with expectations of gender roles. Like a woman and a man being a little socially awkward might just be interpreted differently resulting in the perception of the woman having better social skills e.g. the woman might be more likely to viewed as cute while the man is just viewed as socially awkward. Added to that that we expect…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/03/25 11:39 AM
13	Women often view toxicity through a male-centric lens, making them less likely to recognize their own toxic behavior. Yes 14 to 15 years old	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/03/25 09:24 AM
16	Women often view toxicity through a male-centric lens, making them less likely to recognize their own toxic behavior. In a lot of western countries men have to pay child support even when they got raped and the rapist got pregnant. There are literal children who are forced to give money to their rapist due to child support laws. We can at least agree that this part of child support is toxic	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/03/25 09:15 AM
8	The idea that 'good and attractive men are snatched off the market quickly' is another just-world fallacy. The fact that divorce rates are highest for people in their 20s is the biggest proof. Define good partner. Looks play a VERY huge role in relationship satisfaction so that's one point attractive men (and women) already have by merely existing in a relationship. Now add a little bit of attention, interest and emotional support just things the average person inherently posseses and you have someone who makes their partner happy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/03/25 08:58 PM
12	Guys seem to be upset that most men cant get away with being deeply flawed individuals. The most common ones are not holding eye contact (creep alert), flat affect (creep alert), not having the expected body language (creep alert), not being dominant/ assertive (extremly unattractive to most women), being direct (asshole and creep alert), not putting on an attractive fake persona (unattractive), being bad at small talk (creep alert) and passionatly talking about their interests (loser nerd alert). Autistic men (and women) aren't unattractive bc they behave in a "bad" way but becaus…	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/03/25 08:11 PM
-1	We shouldn't be jealous of shallow relationships The more you see a person the more physically attractive that person becomes to you. So what is to say that the reason friendships shift into relationships isn't just that the attractiveness threshold has been passed eventually after years of meeting up regularly as friends?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/25 03:05 PM
–	You cant say “Guys arent even given a chance” and then tell women “Choose better”. It's really easy to tell when a guy isn't genuine 99% of the time and I mean comically easy. Women just don't even try to vet if the guy is physically attractive. It's the same when women keep a guy around for attention but have no real interest in them. It's super easy to tell when that's the case.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/25 02:58 PM