TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Aishita Archive

View 2 posts and 209 comments by Aishita on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

im not sure what group you think i am part of lol. everyone has different intepretations of the wall. i just took the scientific route. according to dating statistics, the peak of a mans relative smv is either 27 or 50 depending on the study. for women, its 18-23 regardless of study. 30 is commonly when womens relative smv starts to decline dramatically,forcing many of them to settle. For women to marry at 30 proves this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 07:58 PM
1

The wall isn't a hard stop and it isn't the valley of a women's attractiveness. It's actually still near the peak. The wall is just a stage when women commonly start realize that their value decreases with age faster than men's. That's when they start realizing they can't have it all, and grab what they can. Musk marrying a women at 30 proves this exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 05:26 AM
1

one of them was at least 15 years younger tho, womans value decreases as they age
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 06:19 AM
2

Didn't musk end up hitching up a much younger girl after divorcing his wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 04:45 AM
0

sick burn
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 02:47 AM
3

Per statistics, yes. Yes there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 02:34 AM
1

That was very interesting. wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:32 AM
2

You'all know I'm pretty blackish-red myself but you all gotta admit she's making some good points.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:28 AM
2

None of these prove that women pay a disproportionate amount of taxes. They just say that the rich pay less tax as a percentage of their total income. This has nothing to do with women. ​ Pink tax is bullshit. There's nothing forcing women to pay for "pink products". They aren't necessities. Its just whining over nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 03:24 AM
2

thats right bitch, facts dont care about your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:15 AM
2

https://cis.org/Report/How-Many-MailOrder-Brides
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:51 AM
2

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1067%26context%3Ddissentingvoices%23:~:text%3DAvailable%2520reports%2520show%2520that%2520the,Health%2520Research%2520Funding%252C%25202014).&ved=2ahUKEwiVqselhoHuAhWLJDQIHVQnDNEQFjACegQIBhAF&usg=AOvVaw1msu4vLHtJUcXaHukg_3qZ
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:45 AM
1

do you have statistics on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:40 AM
1

label it however you want. the men who do it are statistically better off than those who dont. full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:35 AM
1

exactly, from a mans cost benefit analysis, it is far better to marry a mail order bride. you dont care about what men think, so why should we care about what you think? not dumb questions. the one who is dumb is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:32 AM
1

mail order marriages are estimated to be half as likely to 8 percent less likely than normal american marriages to end in divorce. explain why men shouldnt marry mail order brides? why should men give a shit what you think? regardless of your accusations of random fallacies (which isnt an argument) or comparisons that make no sense, you still havent illustrated why anyone should give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:27 AM
1

legality changes over eras. 50 years ago it was legal to rape your wife. so it was right 50 years ago? wow with such a flexible definition literally any sex can be rape. if thats the case, why should anyone care if something is labelled as rape? we have been raping for centuries by that definition. you were made with rape. rape or no, mail order brides are by far a way better deal than marrying western women, and i encourage more men to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:42 PM
1

marriages already dont last. are you saying that if he believed all women were faultless, kind, and moral, his marriage would still last?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:07 PM
0

citation needed
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:04 PM
2

humans are disgusting, women fucking around in their 20s and settling in their 30s are disgusting. your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:04 PM
1

regardless, your claims are still worthless
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 10:47 PM
1

Your claims would still be worthless if you werent a 30 year old edgy single mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 10:42 PM
3

well said. aptly described last 6 months
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 10:41 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:41 AM
3

But thats what you are doing tho. you are expressing your opinion, do you not know the definition of an opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:40 AM
8

Oh you have an opinion different than mine? YOU MUST BE AN INCEL!111!!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:38 AM
2

Foreign women are way better than American women. I have only ever dated asians originating from other countries. US women suck. I'd say >70% are entitled bitch whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:35 AM
1

When someone speaks in absolutes you know they are retarded. Really? "Nobody", "men"...LOL. Put actual statistics or something. Like maybe 50% of men? 60% of women? How stupid can you be to assert that literally "nobody" likes incels? Id say majority of people don't like the truth anyway. If they did, US would be a lot more functional than now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:33 AM
2

Agreed, purge week is the only time this is fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:22 PM
4

No, it's not that "science" isn't in our favor, its just that you are stupid and don't know basic statistics. None of your replies made any sense hahahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:03 PM
3

lol, notice how she doesn't answer this. BP Women really struggle with cause and effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:02 PM
2

You didn't even address his point lol. You're being deliberately retarded. You're also blatantly ignoring how the first graph affects the second. How could women also mostly message 7s when they barely ever give anyone a 7+ rating? Until you answer this question, you haven't proven shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:01 PM
2

i like u, u are funny
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 10:55 PM
1

Rape on a bigger scale yes. But I consider taking money away rape too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 10:54 PM
3

I highly doubt you were trained as a scientist. You contradict yourself with what you say right afterwards: A day on Staten Island or New Jersey tells me more about white racism than a month in a research library. Don't wanna play "guess the bias/fallacy", but if you were truly trained as a scientist you'd never think this. Lots of fake credentials on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 04:16 AM
4

same to you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 02:40 AM
13

There actually already has been a really good study on it. https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=005106086102117068028119079095064007019038081078058007068004064000079020071096064018110037005040102030114103006000029067083058042003093031103026105093092120065058054084023000092007098074097115124088074028000119109114116087098076008099096001031112&EXT=pdf ​ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=375960 Longitude studies about marriage show that people actually get slightly unhappier…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 10:16 PM
4

Then you are just as retarded as she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 05:54 PM
1

Idk, you both seem like idiots to me...maybe pick some scientific studies that are peer reviewed? That has non-negligible effort put into statistical process control??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:40 PM
0

oh ok, you're retarded, got it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 04:37 PM
1

Yeah, agreed, I haven't been here in months. It's interesting how much my mindset has changed since cutting it out for a while. But it's help me see this sub for what is really is: cheap entertainment. Honestly purge weeks are my favorite times in PPD. This sub is meant to be a flaming train wreck, why does there have to be filters?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:45 AM
0

Are you trolling? Or are both your parents low iq? just curious
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:42 AM
1

If only life was that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:41 AM
1

I wish I wasn't so bored at work right now. I could literally be doing a thousand more things that are more productive than this. And yet occasionally I find myself spending half my work day reading the things you retards post and joining in the degeneracy. Haven't you been posting in this hellhole since like, forever? Pretty sure I talked to you like, 2 years ago. or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:34 AM
2

You sound mad that it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:30 AM
1

That was a piss poor attempt at being funny with an observation, ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:18 AM
2

This was a really good point. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:07 AM
1

Why are you so triggered? You seem pretty pathetic yourself, maybe you should take a break from the internet
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 01:43 AM
2

I got gilded once for calling her retarded...that was funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 03:44 AM
2

But he's right tho
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 03:39 AM
1

I think you need to get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 03:37 AM
1

That humans don't bond with inanimate objects the same way they do with real life human beings Sex bots aren't inanimate objects. social isolation is a source of depression Uh...no shit? I'm asking for a source on the following: When humans do not attach to real other humans, depression will increase. As long as we are aware that the other entity is not "real", we will be unable to bond with them on the same capacity as human beings, and unless you take a person who has been raised with no human…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 01:44 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:47 AM
1

When humans do not attach to real other humans, depression will increase. As long as we are aware that the other entity is not "real", we will be unable to bond with them on the same capacity as human beings, and unless you take a person who has been raised with no human contact from day 1, they will crave contact. Source for this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:42 AM
1

Source? I think these people are more depressed/longing for human contact because sexbots are inadequate/not advanced enough to simulate convincing enough relationships. Once they are advanced enough, it would be no different than the real thing, at least from the perspective of the user.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:42 AM
0

It's sad you're retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 03:08 AM
1

Great post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 06:55 AM
1

“Men” do not have it hard. That doesn't make any sense. You just admitted that a significant portion of men have it hard: Certain groups of men have it hard. Some individual men have it hard. If so many men, so many groups of men have it hard, in your own words, how can you conclude that men in general don't have it hard or easy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 06:51 AM
2

Holy...that was an amazing amount of research. Kudos to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 06:43 AM
0

Honestly, after discovering how truly shallow men are about ass boobs and a flat stomach, how little they care about me as a person, I have absolutely no interest in a long term relationship with one. Actually, that's wrong. Or more accurately, non-equivalent. There are many men who like flat boobs/flat ass more than big boobs/big ass. This is particularly prominent in Japan. Weight may be a universal constant against women, but so it is for men. Also, unattractive women tend to have way more op…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 06:32 AM
2

I disagree, a robot will give better sexual satisfaction than prostitutes and porn. You will always know its a robot Doesn't stop people from becoming emotionally attached to their roombas, soldiers holding funerals for IED robots, men from falling in love with sexdolls. Yes, there are men who are in love with their sexdolls, yet alone sex bots.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 02:29 AM
4

It doesn't have to be exactly the same as an actual partner to fulfill a guy's desire for relationships. There are lots of people without siblings perfectly happy with a dog and their parents. There will also be a lot of people happy with a sexbot. A lack of sex, won't be resolved by putting your dick inside of it. I disagree. Sex with real women is overrated. Sex robots will probably provide better sex than real women do, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 08:08 PM
1

Just bullshit rationalization. If more women were interested in relationships than men, women would suffer. Simple supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 08:05 PM
5

Isn't porn associated with lower rates of rape and sexual assault in general? Wouldn't allowing men to carry their perversions on sexbots greatly decrease the likelihood of said perversions being committed on real women? If a man has a lifelike child sexbot, why is that your business as long as he isn't doing it to real children? It could be the exact opposite: sexbots allow men to live out their wild fantasies until they are satisfied, and leave real life women safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 09:39 PM
13

Eh, humans are more trouble than they are worth. There is that brief sublime feeling of connection for about 3 seconds, but you have to deal with the rest of the bullshit 99% of the time. I'd rather have a bot thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 09:36 PM
-1

More like dumbest comment in the whole thread
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 09:32 PM
1

Ok, quote a false equivalence I made then. Go ahead. if you feel like women not approaching men is a human rights violation When did I ever claim that, lmao. Please quote. which to any reader with a critical mind and without a seething rage boiling beneath his/her skin would understand it was in comparison to an employer-worker transaction. I should have written "...is not transactional in the same way" for your nuance-avoidant brain. So your argument is, "no u are the retard"? We can call each …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:38 PM
3

And yet some women would still protest if it was taken away. Most women are fine not being approached so its not an entitlement. Untrue in my experience. Most women expect to be approached.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 08:06 PM
1

You're propping up false equivalences because you're apparently blind to context. Context means everything. So are you. You're obviously blinded by bias. Stop being hypocritical. An employer is trading its money for your labour. It's transactional. Thus, if your work exceeds your wage, you aren't receiving commensurate compensation from that transaction and it's thus unfair. Everyone engaging in society is in a transactional relationship. Just because you aren't working doesn't mean you aren't b…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:57 PM
2

Ok then, anyone demanding attention is childish entitlement. So that includes all the groups I said then. Anything else is a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:37 PM
2

lmao paying shitty wages isn't a human rights violation. Dumbfucks should just wallow in their shitty tents and focus on what they can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:47 PM
4

Ok then, we should just destroy all whiners. Fuck feminism, fuck black people's rights, fuck worker's rights, fuck women who complain about men on reddit, fuck incel tears, fuck FDS. Supporters of movements like that should stop whining about what they can't control and focus on what they can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:42 PM
3

That's not the full picture and you know it. Look at medical bills, look at tax exemptions, look at money spent on industries (shopping, beauty products, anti-aging products, fashion, etc.) Quite a fair bit of males prisoners are because they committed crimes on females. I wonder what that rate is?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:50 PM
4

Agreed. It sure is ridiculous that women talk all about entitlement when they make up the majority of the country's costs. "Yeah Feminism! Except when we have to pay money and pull our weight."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:47 PM
2

I don't think it is hypocrisy. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did the men leveraging money come first or did they just react to gold digging sluts? I doubt men leveraging money would even be a thing if women didn't react to it first.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:46 PM
2

Unless we are no longer in a voting society. Middle East, Russia, etc. If men were driven to a sufficient extreme, they could take what they wanted through brutal force. Let's hope it doesn't get to that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:45 PM
3

You're being obtuse. u/low-info-vlogger is making a good point. Not having to be approaching is an enormous privilege. Think about it in terms of the job market. The ones who have to approach are the ones who most have to prove themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:41 PM
2

There are no facts in what you conclude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:39 PM
1

Agreed. Bluepill/Feminists greatly overestimate the need for "validation". As if we would care about getting "validation" from a bunch of washed-up entitled bitches lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:19 AM
2

Men have been watching porn for decades. Not going to read it because your description reveals the truth of what I've been saying. Completely false. Porn as it is is a very recent phenomenon. Never before in history has HD Porn been so easily available as it has in the last 5 years. Never has porn been so high quality either. It's a suggestion by the researchers to not watch porn but sorry, it does not show causation which is why they characterize the condition as unexplained. Almost all sociolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 07:12 AM
1

I got fucking roasted. Good, I see you're on the path to some limited self-awareness. ​ Lol right, he was like 'NUH UH' the entire time. ??? Didn't see a single 'NUH UH'...might wanna work on your english a bit. ​ I enjoy feeling pretty when I go out So, you are the primary beneficiary of the money you spend on your looks, which means that's an excuse for you to use. You might as well say "well, I spend money on looking good, so society should pay for my mortgage!". I do mind when guys stare at …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 06:21 AM
1

You got bored? More like you got your ass handed to you by facts. u/darksoldierk, those were some amazing arguments. Kudos.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 06:11 AM
1

You seem pretty biased yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 07:22 AM
1

LOL. You made me choke on the soup I was drinking. I had to log in just to upvote you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 05:53 AM
6

No, people here ignore any evidence that even slightly supports incel theories, for no other reason than for the feelz. Incels are extremist sad sacks, but there is a grain of truth to their claims that people love to ignore because it doesn't fit with their worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 11:53 PM
2

No I didn't, and you're not using goalposts right either, which is equally funny. Moving goalposts refers to a person presenting an argument, receiving evidence that refutes their argument, and then demanding some other evidence. Where did I make any demands of you? Moving goalposts: Moving the goalposts is an informal logical fallacy in which previously agreed upon standards for deciding an argument are arbitrarily changed once they have been met. Yes that is what you did. You made an statement…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 11:53 PM
1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/18/arranged-marriages-happier-claims-former-mhigh-court-family-judg/ ​ Could provide more but there are plenty to see from one google search.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:28 PM
1

What evidence do you have to support this claim, that brides divorce low SMV men once they get citizenship?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:25 PM
1

https://news.gallup.com/poll/248249/record-russians-say-leave-russia.aspx This enthusiasm about Putin and the country lasted for a couple more years, and then desire to migrate started to go up, and in 2018 it reached the highest point in the last 11 years -- 20%. At the same time, Putin's approval started to go down -- dropping in 2018 to 63%, which is the lowest level in the past five years. Gallup recently saw a similar relationship between leadership approval and desire to migrate in the U.S…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:22 PM
1

Of course it's different. I'm not denying that; it's tangential data. But I'm questioning the claim that MOBs are less happy and arranged marriages is the closest comparison I got. Do you have any data on whether MOBs are more or less happy? Do you have a better idea of what to compare MOBs to?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:14 PM
1

Nigga did you really just look it up on wikipedia Nigga do you really not know where the footnotes are? Look at those. All my family in my grandparent's generation had arranged marriages, some in my parent's generation. I know lots of non-family who have had them as well. Same for me. I served in the army in my home country where half my friends were Malay. My grandmother offered to coordinate an arranged marriage for me. May I ask, from what culture do you see these arranged marriages?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:10 PM
2

Yep, your quickness to just say "oh well doesn't matter if I'm wrong about this fallacy because it's not the point" suggests you either don't care very much about their definitions or you quickly wanted to move on out of embarassment. As someone who had to study them a ton in high school my pet peeve is people who say "oh that's ad hominem" or "oh strawman" when they clearly don't know much about logical fallacies lol. I don't care what you think about logical fallacies. You were caught moving g…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:00 PM
0

So you like to throw around logical fallacies without actually knowing what their meanings are. Got it. So you like to throw around conclusions from one data point. Got it. There aren't many studies on the changes and traits of MOBs floating around. So, as we often do on this sub in the absence of data, we consult observation and personal experience. Have you ever met any MOBs before? If so, how have your experiences differed from mine? Observation and personal experience is fine, but without da…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 07:40 AM
0

You changed your goal post from supporting "Pretty much all American men we know who went the MOB route say their wives started out shy and docile but pretty much became another person after a couple years in the states. " to supporting "humans are social creatures and tend to assimilate to the cultures they immerse themselves in." That's what I'm concerned about, not what the exact definition of the term "Strawman". Points for you to clarify: Do all MOB wives start out shy and docile? What is y…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:09 AM
0

That's a strawman. I'm specifically asking whether there is any evidence that supports your claim: "Pretty much all American men we know who went the MOB route say their wives started out shy and docile but pretty much became another person after a couple years in the states. " This claim is much more specific in nature and is very loosely connected to how "humans are social creatures and tend to assimilate to the cultures they immerse themselves in."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:29 AM
0

From dictionary.com: Statistics: the numerical facts or data themselves. Yes, I have statistics. That data was vetted by the USCIS, which has every interest to provide objective data. You have hearsay data from one dating agency which has it in its best interest to keep it marriage/divorce rate high. Your claim is dubious. Every study on mail order marriage rates have shown significantly lower divorce rates than normal. Show me one study that states the opposite instead of slinging claims. I'll …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:26 AM
0

This all sounds like bullshit marketing to me So? This isn't about you, this is about low SMV men. No it is not. Arranged marriages do not take place between families of vastly different social classes, they take place within social classes. Idk what country you're talking about but it absolutely does not work that way in India. From wikipedia: The family expresses their criteria for a good match to the matchmaker, which is usually heavily influenced by family considerations but also includes th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:18 AM
0

More complicated answer is this: once you "import" your mail order bride, eventually she'll get acclimated, notice and embrace all the freedoms and culture other women in the country enjoy, and dump/divorce your incel ass when she realizes she can do leagues better. Yet according to the above statistics, over 80% of mail order marriages endure. Almost all studies agree that mail order brides actually have lower divorce rates than regular marriage. I'm engaged to a Thai woman who I met in college…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:50 AM
1

Won't the low SMV men risk getting further rejected then? Are the mail-order bride's criteria different than local women? The mail-order bride's criteria is easier to meet than local women. Keep in mind, they come from shithole places where men are very shitty. Doubt. Why would pretty women need to resort to being mail order brides? Have you looked at the mail order bride websites or watched mail order bride documentaries? Every single mail order bride is at least somewhat attractive. Furthermor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:46 AM
-1

Until she meets the local Chads and realizes what alimony is. ??? Yet historically mail order marriages are much more likely to endure than normal marriages. Go back up and read the opening post again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:04 AM
2

Did you even read the above statistics? Over 80% of such marriages endured over several years. What a dumb, low-effort post.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:02 AM
0

I am very doubtful that you want them to be happier and live a more fulfilling life. Thus, your viewpoints are biased and have no merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:57 AM
1

who only wants your money? They don't just want your money. Remember, both party must agree to the process. Watch documentaries, there have been mail order brides who have rejected men despite them being rich. There is some vetting going on, on both sides. If you just want sex, a prostitute is cheaper and easier. If you want companionship and love, you're not going to get that with some rando filipino goldigger. It's probably still easier to find that with a local woman. Wrong. Prostitution is f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:54 AM
-1

If they didn't give a shit about their stupid pride they would be happier and live a more fulfilling life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:47 AM
1

Pretty much all American men we know who went the MOB route say their wives started out shy and docile but pretty much became another person after a couple years in the states. That sounds dubious. Do you have citations/studies with a reasonable sample size to support this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:43 AM
0

Love and validation someone has to pay for is no love/validation I hear people say this all the time with no supporting evidence. Please provide sources/elaborate. Is this true for all men? Or is that just a projection. Besides, mail order brides are a completely different breed. Sure, you pay for her to come, but in no way do you continue paying for her to stay. Mail order brides are free to divorce at any time, but as you can see in the above statistic, they continue to stay. Of their own free…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:41 AM
-1

And how does this not provide validation and love?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 02:16 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:53 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:48 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:02 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:02 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:02 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:01 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:59 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:58 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:57 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:56 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:55 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:55 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:54 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims and resort to insults when they lose the debate. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:54 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:53 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:48 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:47 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:47 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:47 AM
1

She and many of her ilk often do this. They like to cite sources that actually have nothing to do with their claims. Kind of sad actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 03:47 AM
1

It means that you can make all the claims you want, but you're not providing methodology or studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 01:36 AM
1

Then why don't you provide your own statistics instead of making stupid assumptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 01:36 AM
1

Love that burn. lol What burn? That's not a burn. That's a stupid statement that makes blatantly false assumptions; your endorsement of it is evidence that you are equally mentally deficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 01:34 AM
5

He already did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 01:30 AM
1

That sounds like something a neck-beard in denial would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 06:27 AM
1

Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:32 AM
0

you sound triggered
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 05:27 AM
1

Looks like the dumb bitch finally stopped yapping. Good Job.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 11:00 PM
1

I wouldn't just say that she's bitter or impossible to reason with. The fact that Poppyblu is an uneducated loud bungler that uses anecdotes and random claims with dubious claims adds to the ugliness; I suggest you don't waste your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 11:40 PM
1

LOL your replies are getting longer and longer by the minute. Getting too triggered? Lost the debate in the other thread and now you are getting salty hahahaha. So let's see, you: Just admitted you have no evidence for anything. Have no reading skills because I linked 10 studies, schooled you on what "causation vs correlation" really means, and yet you still insist that "I have no evidence." Continue to spew the same bullshit insults about being an incel and being low-value despite the fact that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:52 PM
1

Annihilated? 😂 Look's like someone is salty that she lost the debate. All that mental gymnastics and all you could do was admit that none of your claims are supported by anything, just your whining. Not only is your personality shit and your life sad, you spend your entire life on the internet in fear of what men say. No wonder men reject you. You're too dumb to understand what "rationale debate" is, maybe go back to high school. Don't get too triggered by people calling out your bullshit though…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 06:45 PM
0

Haha, rainisthelife really does have an insufferable personality no matter where she goes. It's hilarious to watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 07:31 AM
1

​ Your whining is a poor attempt to hide the fact that you don't have anything supporting your dumb claims. You're resorting to ad hominems because you know you've already lost the debate and have no basis to anything you say. Remember when you claimed: "It’s all revenge fantasies and unrealistic expectations. I personally cannot wait for the sexbots to finally be released. After all the screed, the speed at which men will get bored and go back to chasing women the next day would be hilarious." …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 06:28 AM
1

​ Is that so? Lol! Do you know why those Japanese men are “opting out” of relationships? The answer is that they aren’t actually “opting out”, they’re pushed away by rejection and the high amount of hypergamy by the Japanese women. Just because you read some ridiculous statistic from a bunch of bitter MGTOW or RP men about this statistic doesn’t mean you should take it at face value. Most of those Japanese men are remaining virgins and “opting out” largely because the Japanese women do not want …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 06:37 PM
1

There are so many reasons why there are lower marriage rates, most of which include women no longer needing marriage for income and survival, cultural shift from the necessity of marriage for building ties and connections, feminism and so many others. The fact that porn became more prevalent around this time, is not evidence that porn is the cause of lower marriage rates. Once again, you are making claims with no evidence. Again, evidence please or gtfo. Also I liked how you just dismissed all o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 06:37 PM
1

Lol looks like you’re incredibly triggered by posts and still salty from being abandoned at the last conversation. Hahaha, not only do you not make any sense, you vastly overestimate the value of your company. Correlation is not causation. And frankly, it’s embarrassing that you point this out as “evidence”. Frankly, its embarrassing that you don't know what "correlation is not causation" actually implies. Simply sprouting this term is not an argument. In fact, it speaks of a lower understanding…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 06:36 PM
1

Yeah, it is. You have no proof/evidence that supports this claim. FTFY Certain types of foods, not foods in general. Your body craves high glucose foods sometimes, or high fat foods some other times. It's like having a certain type of food that one likes. It still comes from interaction with the opposite sex.... What comes from interaction with the opposite sex? ​ Relevant studies from 5 seconds of google scholar searches: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/ https://www.science…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 06:08 AM
1

It's a constant amongst practically all species. It's a basic human need need and impulse. Yes, it exists. So? It isn't an overpowering drive. It's there just like your desire to eat sugary foods or your instincts to seek others' approval so you don't get thrown out of the tribe. But humans are more than a set of instincts, and everyone is different. You don't need a relationship to get any of those things. Exactly. Exactly my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:39 AM
4

" Porn was not exactly studied much during the onset of it, but now there is a slew of studies that point out some very startling correlations. Yes, yes, I know that correlation does not equal causation. However, to dismiss the implications of the correlation because of that is sheer ignorance. Correlation does not equal causation, but it does point to the causation if results from multiple suitably large sample sizes, longitudinal studies and low p-values agree. Keep in mind that many of these …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:35 AM
1

Our biology is a very complex amalgamation of millions of years of evolution, nitrogenous bases, protein development and other biotic processes. The desire to mate is one tiny part of the millions of adaptations that populate our species. Please, link a paper/scientific study that shows that having a real woman for approval is absolutely necessary for life satisfaction. Better yet, if the drive for getting a woman for validation/companionship/mutual support is so absolute, explain why relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:32 AM
3

Lol do you even know what proof is? A link to an internet thread is just linking to a bunch of randoms on the internet sprouting anecdotes and fallacies. Peer-reviewed study/statistical data set/ credible source from psychologist/anything more credible than a biased news article, or gtfo.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:26 AM
1

??? Nothing is stopping someone who uses VR porn from having a fulfilling social life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:23 AM
1

This PPD forum only has 21.9k subscribers lol. How is this representative of the world population? And wouldn't getting guys used to sex with star-tier women further reduce their desire to go out?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 04:22 AM
1

Right, you do you. Why project on the general population? Hasn't child birth rates been declining for a while, as well as the desire for kids among the younger generation? It isn't driving me to colonoscopy appointments either. ??? What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:27 AM
1

Hey brothers, count me in. I'm the mechanical engineer, I can make the sensors. I'm a killer 3D Printer.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:24 AM
1

You're making conjectures of their behavior without any proof. And even if what you say is true, incels make such a small proportion of the male population anyway. What they do hardly impacts what is going on now, but the average male's actions is far more world-shaking,
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:22 AM
2

GreasyPole, well argued.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:20 AM
2

Because they will.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:20 AM
1

That's you. Everyone is different. I'm willing to bet that if you gave the average person a choice between being in a 95% realistic rainforest for free and spending a few thousand dollars on a plane ticket, taking leave from work, having to physically trek, pack, plan, etc., most would choose the 95% real choice. It's not about quality. It's about the effort to reward ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:18 AM
1

You seem to idolize physical sex for some reason. I don't get why physical sex is seen as so magical. Tbh, I've had physical sex before, and while some were great, some were also terribly lousy. Yes, on average, better than masturbation. But it isn't the end-all. No, VR might never be exactly the same as physical sex. But it is much easier to get, and probably has a much better reward to effort ratio, that's why its the game breaker. It takes a lot of work to get laid. Most nights I masturbate, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:16 AM
1

But the market has already been heavily affected by porn. Marriage rates are declining, despite the much touted biological imperatives. If such biological imperatives were absolute, you would not be seeing the decline phenomenon today. See: Japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:13 AM
1

Haptic sensors?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:11 AM
3

This shit isn’t giving you validation, companionship, mutual support, or jackshit other than draining your balls. Is that why people enter relationships? Why does it have to be a woman for validation/companionship/mutual support? There are so many other avenues for these things that cost less time, effort and money lol. This argument is way overstated and is illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:10 AM
2

@oneprettycoolcat, Source/Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:08 AM
1

Ok yeah, that was a lot more reasonable than I expected. I agree with you on almost all your points, except religious based arguments. I tend to be iffy on those. Regarding consciousness, it has still not been clearly defined so there's no point making conjectures on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 04:25 AM
2

AI will probably never be as complex as DNA Wow, you must be an expert in biology and computational structures. Please explain to me why this is the case and also please cite the relevant studies/academic findings. And at least I can believe that my dog has a soul. To me using a bot for companionship in any way seems haunting. I'm always reminded it's fake. What is "fake"? What is a "soul"? I don't see any difference between electrical signals conducted via transistors and electrical signals con…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 12:40 AM
1

Right, which means everyone is different. Sex bots aren't for everyone, but a sizable portion of men would likely find it a more viable alternative than pursuing a real relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:58 PM
1

Sex bots and prostitution are nowhere comparable. Having sex with a prostitute even with condoms on (which drastically lowers the enjoyment of sex) can saddle a man with several incurable STDs. That's assuming that the condom doesn't break. I don't know about you, but when I'm having sex, the last thing I want to think about is about how if I'm not careful, I could fuck myself over hard. It takes the enjoyment away a little bit. ​ ​
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:39 PM
2

Why not a sex bot with a dog's personality implanted?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:35 PM
1

I don't know, I had quite a pretty girl friend when I was in the military and I didn't feel any satisfaction with being in a relationship. Sure, the sex was nice, but it felt like a chore to keep up the relationship and I missed having free time. I was actually relieved when we broke up. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:34 PM
1

Well for one thing the modelling industry will probably collapse, prostitution prices would drop drastically, many industries such as jewelry will probably be negatively affected, demand for diamonds would probably drop somewhat, people would leave their houses less often... There would be a lot of economic effects that would spiral outwards. There would likely be a greater demand for electrical/mechanical technicians or engineeers, some political upheaval, etc. Of course, most people would cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:23 PM
1

Not this silly shit again. I wonder why every time a thread like this comes up some salty girl has to throw a pissy fit and scream, "ReVenGZ Fantsiezzzz!!!11!!". Chill, haha. If anything it makes it seem like you are really scared that such revenge fantasies will come true. And actually, the data does support the possibility that it could come true. It’s all revenge fantasies and unrealistic expectations. I personally cannot wait for the sexbots to finally be released. After all the screed, the …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 10:18 PM
2

Yeah, at least she's self aware. She should also add "air-headed" next to it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:19 AM
2

80_20: Brings up data, numerous books and citations. Argues eloquently and patiently. kandyapplez: No u are wrong. I just kno it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:17 AM
2

Anything to back up this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:16 AM
2

So you agree you lost?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:15 AM
1

Dont engage with salty uneducated simpletons who have lost the debate so hard that they can only resort to ad hominems :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:15 AM
2

It does not really matter, you are not here to debate or have your mind changed. Good night. Aka, "I have no proof, I have no evidence, and I have lost the debate. I am just here to make my own assertions that are pulled from thin air, and I am right just because."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:13 AM
2

Agreed, this beachredwhine is a real idiot, such a good idiot he can't see reality even if it farted in his face.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:08 AM
1

Ok glad we settled that so you literally have no facts that prove the okcupid study otherwise. Crazy how you still deny reality. How about you just scroll up, read his posts, and address them? You're not blind right? ​
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 06:06 AM
1

Sorry if I came across as belligerent. I honestly couldn't care less if millennial women earn more or not. I'm not saying that people can't use news articles (I actually like wikipedia). What I was ragging about was using biased news sites that don't publish their data analysis methods. People can use them all they like; that's not going to stop me from pointing out why they aren't as good as peer reviewed sources. It's sad that the average validity of the comments here aren't even high school l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 12:37 AM
1

Read a newspaper once in a while. It’s common knowledge that millennial women outearn their male counterparts. This is what you said. None of what you have linked supports that. Each article cherry picked a specific geographical region using small sample sizes with statistically insignificant differences, backed with no multiple sample variance testing. That's like scooping a random tiny cube of water from the sea, measuring it, finding its salinity levels are that of pure water, and then conclu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:55 AM
1

I just looked at your post history, you have literally spent your time doing nothing but replying to comments on reddit for at least the last hour. Evidence shows that the one without a life is you. Just admit that your assertion is based on shit pulled out of thin air. It takes less than 2 minutes to do a google scholar search, if you can spend your whole day on reddit at least spend five minutes educating yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:21 AM
1

It's ok, poppyblu makes a lot of assertions without sources then she fucks off when she loses the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 01:55 AM
3

@zmndyeqm, you definitely won this round. Any idiot can make ad hominems, only a few are capable of making actual arguments backed by evidence. Persaeus is just one of those idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 01:53 AM
1

Don’t see what something being a lifestyle choice has to do with someone else’s preferences. Are you trolling? A lifestyle choice is a choice. It means it's something that someone can choose. If someone is unattractive because of something he or she has chosen to not address, it is far more unattractive than a trait that is not gained by choice. Because it not only implies an unattractive trait, but also an unattractive personality with a lot of red flags. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 06:27 AM
2

You missed the "big scheme of things" part of the argument. Men have gone off to war, emigrated, and otherwise disappeared from societies for centuries, under various circumstances. Societies can easily deal with a shortage of men by having less men breed with more women. Maybe in those eras where killing or getting rid of excess population was a viable and accepted way of doing things. However, just look at the medicare problem in the United States (and its effect on national debt) as well as t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 05:53 AM
1

If you’ve truly seen me responding to posts like this, then you must have seen the arguments that I’ve made that debunk most of your claims here. Ok, what are they and what evidence do you have to support them? Do you have any evidence, statistics, etc.? I looked at the articles you provided here and I especially like the one about how hugs from robots encourage pro social behavior. Because I don’t think you realize what that paper is saying and what it’s implication is. Hugs from robots encoura…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:22 AM
1

Rainisthelife do you have any statistics or sources to support what you are saying? Because in a very recent study I have read the opposite: that men have no increase in happiness after marriage and men who divorce are less happy than men who have always been single. Also it may be that happier men marry more often, not that marriage makes men more happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:07 AM
1

I also have a busy personal and professional life, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I do not think that they’ll make any significant difference in the value of women or the sexual marketplace. It’s really just a revenge fantasy for low value men. May I ask what evidence, studies or statistics do you have to support this? It has been shown that it isn't only low value men, but also married men, that demonstrate significantly lower desire to pursue women if they used porn. If porn can have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 12:55 AM
1

I know this thread is dead, but rainisthelife, I'm actually curious as to why you stopped contributing after this post. Did you change your mind regarding sexbots? What kind of impact do you think they will have? I'm just curious, because in sexbot threads in the past you were very vocal, and I'm intrigued by the fact that you only left one post in this thread. Do you still think that the idea of sex bots having a heavy impact on the dating market is a "silly revenge fantasy"? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 11:43 PM
0

Jesus... anyone who could read my post and then claim I was defending men who want sex bots is so far below my intellectual level of functioning I just can't continue this discussion anymore. Holy moly, who ate your baby? I think you should chill. Women that need a vibrator are the exact same person as men who need a sexbot. Social retards and/or hate raging dimwits who can't get laid at all, let alone with someone they can have good sex with. Well, glad to see another contender for more hilarit…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 09:04 AM
2

Exactly. Quality of romantic relationships would suffer immensely but because the generation that will suffer the most won't have perspective on how relationships were like before sex bots, they won't be the ones complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 09:35 PM
4

There's only a minority of men who say, "We’ll show you, wimminz, when all the men have sexbots and you’re all alone with your cats!” The same guys who are now turning to porn and video games. Women are going on without them. Yup, never disagreed with you there. Both men and women are going on without each other. Has been happening for a while now. Don't need to keep bringing it up. Women go their own way, men go their own way...Good! If everyone could get their sex bots and live in peace that w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 07:27 PM
2

First off, they wouldn’t really be incels anymore if they take themselves off the market. They’d be volcels. Ok, I revise my argument. Assume everything I've said refers to volcels then. I have to admit I'm not up to date with purple pill terminology. I can tell by your comment you’re not and have never been married. What does that have to do with anything? It’s not porn or sexbots that ruins marriages. It’s the problem that drove the husband to seek alternative sources of sex in the first place…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 07:22 PM
3

It’s incel types who get no attention from women at all. Why would we care if these guys get sexbots? Most of us would be glad if sexbots satisfied their need and made them happy (we do have hearts contrary to popular PPD opinion). I'm sorry but where did you get the impression that only incels would get sex bots? https://www.citylab.com/life/2014/09/not-married-the-odds-that-you-never-will-be-are-higher-than-ever/380686/ "Before, 10 percent of men and 8 percent of women were never married, wher…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 08:13 AM
1

Wow, yeah. I just looked into roombas and the deep emotional attachment people form with them. You get an upvote from me, they are another very strong argument for why sex bots will make a huge impact on the SMP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 04:30 AM
3

I know it’s not the same thing but this belief that women will freak out because dudes she doesn’t want to fuck anyway are buying sexbots is a more than little irrational. I think this silly argument can also be put to rest here. The data doesn't support your statement. Married men are men that at least one women wants to fuck. Even they have reported being much less invested in the relationship after porn usage. See above study: -User faces difficulty becoming sexually aroused without pornograp…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 03:12 AM
2

And robots can simulate that human companionship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 12:59 AM
1

Because "no u" is an effective argument. /s Seriously what is even your point? What argument are you trying to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 12:02 AM
1

conjecture " But some conjectures have more data supporting them than others. And conjectures are used all the time in scientific/engineering breakthroughs. For example, computational fluid dynamics is a very ill-defined discipline where many many situations have not been fully understood. But it is by conjectures supported by incomplete data paired with other conjectures supported by incomplete data that allow for more principles and discoveries to be found day by day. The same occurs with disc…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:45 PM
1

You sound angry, are you okay? Anyway, I'm curious, what's your point? What argument are you trying to make? Let me repeat myself: "I also don't get why people place such a premium on "sexual and romantic bonds". They are just emotions, just like every other emotion. Robots are capable of inspiring emotions, which means that they are also capable of inspiring love. A robot that can invoke grief, happiness, comfort, etc. will naturally be able to invoke emotions such as love. It isn't hard, and r…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:38 PM
1

I'm very well aware as to the function of studies, however, it is entirely possible to say we don't have the necessary studies/information to make conclusions, instead of straw manning our way there. On such topics logical discussions and conclusions(as has been done for centuries) will have to do until the necessary information presents itself. There will never be perfect data. But that doesn't stop us from creating accurate simulations of future events. Entire sub-fields of engineering and sci…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:18 PM
1

sex bots as they're being described don't exist. there are zero studies on human relationships with sex bots. even the studies you linked about humans being able to form "sentimental bonds" with objects relates 0 to sexual and romantic bonds which is what were talking about with robots. no one here is positing anything scientific when we talk about sex robots, on either side. sometimes people like to shoot the shit about things we don't know yet. Seriously did you even read the opening post? The…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:00 PM
1

Interesting. Do you have the source for this data? https://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2010/pdf/ManningTST.pdf https://www.thedatingdivas.com/pornography-affects-marriage/ Seriously these are in the opening post. There are more up there, I don't know why I'm repeating myself. And the statistic isn't actually 54%. Some studies say 60%. Others say 70%. The above two are just two studies, there are much more that you can look up on your own. And I’m not the one whose emotional. I could care less if …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:54 PM
1

So I'm going to reply to both of your posts. This still makes absolutely no difference to the SMP. Because most normal regular guys still want the emotional validation that comes from a woman choosing them. It is the same argument with sexbots. Humans can indeed form a level of emotional connections to non-human objects. However is that the same as the connection humans make to each other? Not anywhere close. No man, if given the choice, will choose prozzies or bots over a real woman who actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 06:42 PM
2

If a guy is an orbiter I doubt he'd choose a sex bot over his object of orbit if she wanted him. Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 06:32 PM
2

Sorry if I offended you in anyway. I don't have any revenge fantasies. If all women got their own sex bots and all men got their sex bots, why would I care? Why would anyone care? If people are happy, does it even matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 06:31 PM
3

to me it’s just sour grapes. “Ill show you for rejecting me when I’m snuggling up to my sexbot and you’re all alone!” You sound very emotional about this. Are you ok? No one is claiming this will happen. Porn already has such a large impact (existence doubles divorce rate, is a major factor in over 54% of divorce cases, is highly correlated with men who are uninterested in sex/marriage) but most women are not freaking out about it. I doubt that even if sex bots were to take 70% of men out of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 06:29 PM
1

"Be careful of relying solely on studies to negate a stance. There's so much we as humans have yet to scratch the surface of. If we had studies for everything a debate sub like this wouldn't exist. " Studies, proofs, visual evidence, etc. are the ways to have concrete evidence for occurrences. If not, any Tom, Dick or Harry can say whatever they fuck the want and proclaim that it is true. We actually do have copious studies for things that should not be debatable, such as the fact that the world…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:16 AM
2

I have a similar story to many young men. Early 20s virgin here, have been on a few dates before in my life, but nothing meaningful. I feel like society places a lot of social pressure on guys to have girlfriends and whatnot. There was one time I went on a date with a girl and gotten a picture of her in my arms. I've been using that to lie about having an ex-gf ever since just so that people wouldn't think there was anything wrong with me. The problem is, I currently have little motivation to ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/18 07:33 AM
1

I actually heavily disagree. There are many men who don't crave real relationships and real women, but are driven by sex. There are many men who just want sex and nothing else. And in a way, this makes sense. After all, why would you need validation specifically from a women? You can easily get validation from close male friends, a successful career, your own accomplishments, etc. I think you need a citation for the "mother nature" claim. In japan, there are millions of herbivore men who have op…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/18 11:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter