TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AkaiAshu Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by AkaiAshu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean thats fine. Women are now less likely wanting to marry and less likely wanting to have kids in the future than men. So those men are always going to be single anyways, hence no loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 03:46 AM
1

They arent radicalized into hating men. They always have hated men. They were just taught to keep quite about it in the past since it was difficult for single women to live on their own. Now, they can be open about it since they dont have to undergo that training.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:57 AM
1

If you look at the stats, it clearly shows that women are less likely to see a future in marriage and having kids. A recent poll showed that only 63% of teenage women think marriage and having kids is important for their future, down from 86% 20 years ago. Teenage men have roughly the same number - 74% today to 75% 20 years ago - which means that women are less likely to see having kids and marriage as a requisite in their lives. Therefore, women are simply more likely to try out a single life t…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:41 AM
0

Big deal. Does it matter ? Imagine crying about something this stupid.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 03:30 AM
1

No one is bearing it alone. If she can't pay for the child, the government will be forced to help. Which means our taxes. So it's better just have the father rather than every father do it.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 01:27 AM
2

Problem is that the baby is objectively inside the mother's body. So there is nothing the man can do to another person's body.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 01:19 AM
0

Okay this is stupid. There is absolutely nothing wrong for a private charity to focus solely on women's health. They are not under any obligation to focus on both men and women.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 07:21 AM
1

I mean women hear it from outside the internet, not inside. Thats the issue here.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:36 AM
1

Constant hate - by a few people ranting on social media. Lmafao no one will take such crybabies seriously. No wonder people look down on mens rights movements.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:24 AM
1

1) No man is being put in jail for ranting. They can rant too. 2) Against what are you ranting ? Women are ranting about everyone telling them to be submissive to women. Who are telling men to be submissive ? And to whom ?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:19 AM
1

Because none of the insults mean anything ? Like let them rant, its better than always asking for nuance.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:52 PM
1

I mean feminism focuses on actual news and not social media talks. As for men, yeah that's kinda what's expected of them.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:16 AM
1

Dont care if men are stupid enough to lean 'conservative' or shit. If you want obviously reactionary takes on social media to have the same level of thinking and nuance as an academic article, you are the fool. If they are such losers that they agree with redpill content, then they deserve to suffer.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:57 AM
-2

That's why people won't take men's rights groups seriously. The joke is not that they were hurt by men. The joke is how every adult figure, particularly the religious ones, would tell women to obey men and be submissive. So obviously they took the other extreme - instead of being submissive, we genocide them. Most people are aware that the jokes are aimed at those people, not ordinary men. Hence any man who complains about it is seen as a thin skinned idiot or dismissive of what women go through…
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:10 AM
-3

Thats because most people realize where the revenge joke is coming from. Men dont have the background to say the same joke. Thats why they will be seen as wrong. As with everything, context matters.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 04:24 AM
-8

Because most of the things people see for so called mens rights movements are complaining that some women are joking about genociding men. Most people have accepted that women are doing this to show irony of their lives whereas mens rights groups are making it a thing to freak out about. So they are treated as delusional.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:21 AM
1

Any ? Where have you been? 90% of those I interact with are hard core anti-Terfs.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 05:33 PM
1

No it isnt. You look at S Korea, thats where the world is headed.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:37 AM
1

I mean depends on the feminists. There is a whole civil war in feminists right now because of the TERFs. JK Rowling calls herself a feminist yet most feminists hate her. You really need to point out which branch of feminist did you visit here.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:35 AM
2

The SocDems are against anything like this by RFK. Tbh they soured on RFK before everyone.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:34 AM
1

If the courts did not enforce the law, should I not say that they are not doing their job properly? What is wrong with you ?
/r/MensRights23/04/25 12:13 PM
0

That's the courts not doing their job properly. That's all.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:44 AM
-1

That's what investigations are for. Anyone believes can investigate the same and file a case of fraud in the courts. As for videos - you do understand the term 'rage bait' right ?
/r/MensRights22/04/25 12:50 PM
-1

Your stupid ass took my insult literally 😂😂😂😂😂. Anyways, what people think toxic and what is not is not decided by any judge. I have worked with people that gef creeped out over people smiling at them. No one can decide what is toxic and what is not.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:49 PM
0

Of course there is trauma Bonding. I have worked with people as a lawyer. My first advice is to always look for therapy before taking action.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:39 PM
1

That's just you being a crybaby. 'People look at me differently' is not a big deal. There is nothing wrong with one Netflix series. The problems you mentioned have nothing to do with Netflix lol.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 12:20 PM
-5

Child support is, as the name suggests, for the child, not the partner. Ideally it should be paid by the state, but right wingers just want children to starve. So we are stuck here
/r/MensRights21/04/25 12:15 PM
-2

You do realize you can break up or divorce toxic partners right ?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 12:11 PM
-5

Just say you are an idiot if that's the case. What's toxic to people changes from person to person. Same with toxic masculinity. Anyone with basic sense should know this.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 12:09 PM
-3

What hostility exactly ? Like be honest, is everything in your head? What hostility are you specifically talking about?
/r/MensRights07/04/25 02:52 AM
1

So there is no reason to oppose 50% of these roles being reserved for women.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:33 PM
1

Least dangerous cushy jobs ? Where that come from ? They literally want to enter more into the military, but conservative men wont let them (Former VP Mike Pence was against it). You are creating the problem and then saying they benefit from it. Just give them half of all important positions if you think it does not matter if they occupy most of it.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:28 PM
1

DEI is supposed to benefit them. Thats the whole damn point of DEI.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:00 PM
1

So you have no problem with such a reservation? Then there is no issue with them taking benefits of DEI nos.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 01:38 AM
1

So there is no problem with reserving 50% of the posts for women then? Understood, thank you.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 05:58 PM
1

So you are okay with Women being 100% of the above mentioned fields ? Thank You.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 05:52 PM
1

So its not marginalization if men are not present at all in the Congress, Executive, Judiciary, Law Enforcement, Medicine and armed forces. You are okay to live in such a world as a man. Thank you for explaining your stance.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 05:35 PM
1

So you would be okay if all politicians were women, all lawyers and judges were women, all legislators were women, all scientists were women, all police officers were women and all army officers were woman, men wont be allowed to open bank accounts on their own and rely on their wives to give them money, since thats what you are advocating wont make men marginalized.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 04:06 PM
0

Are they in places where the most important decisions, laws etc are made ? As long as they are not, they are marginalized. How is spending money related to marginalization ?
/r/MensRights09/02/25 04:22 PM
-9

marginalized means underrepresented at important positions. If they make up 50% of the population, then they ought to be 50% of the judges, lawyers, doctors, teachers, career politicians, police officers, university leaders, business leaders among others. They must be in that much positions of power and the decision making process. Otherwise, they are marginalized.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:12 AM
1

Its a bail. There is no flight risk. Thats literally the point of bail. Idk what is wrong with it. People that dont know the law acting like they see problems in it are the best kinds of jokers.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:56 AM
1

I mean none of what you said anything outside of internet conversation. A lot of men are part of erotica fiction, a lot of people call women fat, a lot of women want to join combat roles but many in the current conservative side of the debate are against it (Mike Pence was). Like all of this just sounds like a crybaby complaining that they were not congratulated for living their everyday life or some shit.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:53 AM
1

They are also the largest proportion of the population outside of white men, so obviously they will benefit more. Basic maths.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:47 AM
0

I mean there isnt a 'future prediction' placard over someone's head saying this person is safe and this person isnt. So the potential abuser tag is true as potential murderer, terrorist, robber tags. You dont know the future nor can you read people's minds. There is an inherent risk in interacting with people. So I dont see what the argument is about.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:31 AM
1

Men are taught that women don't really want us, so we should just be so thankful they're willing to have sex with us, giving women a lot of power over men. Nah hold up, you expect random people you have never met to randomly WANT YOU? For what ? Like thats a different level of delusional. Not how anything works lmao. Women are also sexually attracted. They are sexually attracted to different things than each other as well (As evidenced by the existence of the LGBTQ community). So obviously there…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:27 AM
-3

Alimony and child support are simple - If men dont pay, the government will raise taxes to pay for them. Every place that went against abortion saw a rise in number of orphans in orphanages. So its simply easier to put the burden on the guy than burdening everyone else. It hurts married men, but since it doesnt hurt everyone else, its a fair tradeoff. It was your desire to be married, no one can force you. Porn industry wont dissapear anyway. Like dont watch it? what else do you want to hear? Ev…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:22 AM
2

I mean being fired over hairstyle is simply a stupid action. Like there is no argument here. Most of the hair discrimination was against traditionally Native American and African American hairstyles. However, if Boris Johnson can be the British Prime Minister, having any sort of hair rule is stupid af. This isnt even a feminist issue like at all. Its a stupidity issue.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:13 AM
3

because using underwear has nothing to do with evidence. wearing any type of underwear does not indicate consent.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 04:32 AM
1

I mean boys and men ought to get a mental health check up at least once a year. Same as a regular physical doctor checkup.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:17 PM
1

All boys and men need a psychiatrist
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:32 PM
1

Yeah but that not the job of normal people. They are here to live their own lives, not be your psychiatrists.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:27 PM
1

Let them complain that men are not approaching them. Whats wrong with that ? If they wanna be approached they gotta be approachable first.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:41 AM
-2

There is nothing wrong in not approaching women. In fact, it will now put the onus on women to chase after men they like.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 08:17 AM
1

What do you want by constructive ? If someone says cyanide is poisonous and should be avoided, its not constructive either. Same with toxic masculinity. If any behaviour is exhibited that forms part of toxic masculinity, people will call it out.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:02 AM
2

its a good thing that a lot of men dropping out of dating.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:36 AM
-5

🤣🤣🤣 yeah this is an important problem. Reddit lol.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:33 AM
-3

Dont compliment someone who doesn't wanna be complimented. Dont ask a woman's number who do not want to talk to you. How hard is it ?
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:32 AM
1

Thats literally what I mean. That society teaches men to exhibit behaviours that are considered toxic. All behaviours can be linked to otherwise positive behaviours. Same with toxic ones. The difference is in the degree.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:21 AM
1

Gender role is one that is limited to gender. However, if the limits aren't strong enough, the other genders can and will take it up. Toxic masculinity is about a certain kind of societal expectation on men that is toxic. Thats all. Men are not the ones who are toxic.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 06:29 PM
0

The concept is based the traditional gender ideas and roles on society. Not on the individuals themselves.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:42 PM
0

Why do you think masculinity only applies to men ? Dont we use the term masculine women and feminine men now-a-days on men and women who don't behave in the traditional way ? That simply means something associated with traditional masculinity is toxic. Definitely doesn't apply to all men. Anyone who looks closely at it can say
/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:36 PM
1

Parents have no rights on kids. Only duties.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 11:26 AM
1

And ? If women won't want the guys that are there, they will live alone. There is no compulsion for them to date anyone.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 11:23 AM
-5

Being rejected by girls is nothing to cry about, thats what they deserve. And trying to end the practices that hurt them is the best way forward. People called slavery toxic as a start to get it to change. Toxic masculinity is nothing but those traits associated with traditional masculinity that are toxic in nature and harmful for everyone.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 11:21 AM
-22

Lol, as if any of them would have been granted if the feminists did not protest at that level. Nice living in fantasy
/r/MensRights29/09/23 11:16 AM
-4

How is that bad ? If you claimed defamation but could not prove it, doest that make you liable for their legal cost?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 06:23 AM
1

all of these points are so funny because reality is a lot different.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/23 01:54 AM
1

With a friend ? So if I have a bad experience with a male friend, then all male friendships are fake and worthless ? Not making any sense
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:04 AM
1

I dont get the hate for male-female friendships. Like two people chilling out. Whats wrong with that.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:21 PM
2

Define both society and real men. I feel we have a different concept of both
/r/MensRights06/02/23 01:33 PM
0

Hating Men was never on the table. Misandry is very little present in comparison to patriarchy, which is the major cause of the problems. Even the whole male conscription part is patriarchy itself. Most people seem to not understand that.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:50 PM
1

The data is concerning. However, there really has been no real analysis of it yet so hard to make something out of it.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:36 PM
1

Thats what I have said, Intersectionality is only a growing field, not by far the biggest group.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:30 PM
1

You think feminism is a monolith ? Lmao thats the problem. Its not. There are different views, and about the race factor, the growing intersectionality group is coming, but its still in the minority. Neither is feminism an organization. Literally anyone can say they are feminists and somehow the idiots blame all the feminists for their own work, which might not even make sense in relation to feminism at all. And UN is by FAR not feminists, they could not guarantee basic LGBTQ rights to all membe…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:09 PM
-4

Why is it surprising that a feminist is standing up against gender discrimination ? Been doing it for decades now lol
/r/MensRights05/02/23 11:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter