TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AkiHoshizora Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by AkiHoshizora on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Exactly, we should roll with it when our assumptions are proved wrong. Something the asker clearly did not do.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 11:05 PM
0

Perhaps. But when your assumptions are proved wrong and the other side is technically right, you don't really have much ground to stand on in an argument. He/she assumed wrong, maybe they should've also been a well-adjusted adult and rolled with it instead of acting out like a child.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 10:17 PM
0

If I asked someone to order for me, I'd offer pay them back at a later date because it's common courtesy. The fact that they were ranting and insulting the other person for not paying for their own food makes it clear to me that they had no intention of even thinking about paying the other person back.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 09:49 PM
0

Parents have a responsibility to pay for their children's expenses, because they are children. The person asking is a working adult, and last I checked, assuming someone else will pay for your food is not acceptable behaviour unless you two are very close. In general, the person asking should offer to pay them back at a later date and if the person being asked turns down the offer, only then can they assume the other person will pay.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 09:46 PM
1

I'm pretty sure most are upvoting it because it was funny and had a good laugh.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 09:27 PM
3

Are you missing a /s here? They're obviously talking specifically about single mothers who act entitled, like the one in this post.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 10:23 PM
97

pls no
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 10:51 PM
0

That's sounds right, but it's hard to tell the difference sometimes.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 09:42 AM
1

This reminds me of when I used to try and argue with religious people.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 09:27 AM
6

It does mean you're against progress. Bad progress, that is.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 12:11 PM
6

I suppose it's less about not wanting to be touched and more of an attempt at asserting that 'you're not allowed to (touch me) but I am'.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/20 05:52 PM
21

While it is a pretty wide-ranged roast, nothing should really be taken seriously on the roasting subreddit. It's supposed to be a place for people to say whatever they want about other people without repercussions, athough reality can be rather disappointing. There are always a few snowflakes who are on there for the attention and can't really take anything beyond a mild roast and the fact that according to other people, she deleted the post history basically proves it. Although the commentor sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/20 09:46 AM
3

Now now it's not good to make assumptions. I was merely suggesting a possible reason as to why some may find such people less desirable.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:58 AM
3

Words are free. This is about whether or not they can be trusted to actually turn those words into action.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:52 AM
7

It's also about trustworthiness. If they're used to being promiscuous, there will definitely be some doubts as to whether they'll revert on the part of the partner who is actually looking for a serious relationship. You can say you won't revert, but words are free. Are they just supposed to take your word for it?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:37 AM
4

And how would the current partner know whether this time round you're actually planning on committing given your past?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:33 AM
1

There is no evidence to currently suggest it is airborne, meaning it is still possible. Don't forget the matter at hand is the fact that the woman pulled off the guy's mask and the possibility that it could be airborne is enough for the kind of reaction she received. Although the information is appreciated, a simple link would've sufficed rather than all that crap about my reading comprehension. Have you considered the possibility that I had not read your particular article yet? I'm only telling…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/20 01:16 AM
2

If we return to the topic at hand, the fact of the matter is that the woman pulled off the guy's mask and even though the virus being airborne is only a possibility (since it is still being investigated), I hardly believe depriving someone of the ability to protect themselves from this possible threat is a morally upright decision. Isn't this the main point here?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/20 03:13 PM
4

"Like SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV induced pneumonia through respiratory tract by clinical observation." Zhang, W., Du, R.H., Li, B., Zheng, X.S., Yang, X.L., Hu, B., Wang, Y.Y., Xiao, G.F., Yan, B., Shi, Z.L. and Zhou, P., 2020. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 9(1), pp.386-389.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/20 01:16 AM
2

Well you seem to be overly hating on 'fat and unsuccessful' people. I wonder what a person like that correlates to.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/20 11:50 AM
6

Setting alight a present is a small thing but a futon? That's a while lot bigger. How big of a thing does she need to set alight for it to be 'trying to cause damage'?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/20 07:24 PM
1

How about you fix your grammar first?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/20 11:30 AM
2

Wouldn't it possible for the guy to send a good portion of his savings as 'monetary aid' to his family before the divorce so he would lose less, then he can get it back from his family later?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/19 08:22 PM
31

It could've gone back to the guy's family.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/19 08:10 PM
5

I thought the same thing. Apparently not according to this.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/19 07:13 PM
2

Ah I see, that makes sense now.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 11:16 PM
3

Since when did 'thot' mean 'attractive'?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 09:45 PM
-28

Not that it had anything to do with the guy but to be fair, your comment wasn't exactly the nicest. Edit: You downvoters either need to look up the definition of 'thot' or you really need to brush up on your social ettiquete.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 06:33 PM
3

You literally just proved his point.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 08:51 AM
6

I'm afraid I'll have to agree with this one. The rights women had back then were also a lot less than they are now and so it would've been safer for them financially to find a husband quickly and stick with them rather than find someone else which will take time.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/19 08:47 AM
2

Yes I had just realised that. A simple google search only yielded: A person who is sexually attracted to children. I had not realised it was, more specifically, prepubescent children. Thanks for the reminder.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 01:19 PM
2

Hmm I knew there were people like that but I didn't know most of the offenders were like that. Either way it's still a pretty sad thing the victims to have to go through.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 11:25 AM
11

Why the fuck would someone have sex with a child without being sexually attracted to a child? Do you have sex with people you're not attracted to? I'm clearly not saying they are different, but they are linked. You should really learn to read.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 10:18 AM
5

Let me rephrase: anyone who has sex with a minor must ALSO a pedophile. Western country? Like the UK at 16 years old? Sorry but 15 is still lower than 16.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 10:09 AM
9

Pedophilia means sexual feelings directed towards children. Therefore, not all pedophiles have sex with minors, but anyone who has sex with a minor is a pedophile, like what happened here. Exactly what am I incapable of understanding here? Do enlighten me. Futhermore, an adult having sex with a child of 15, an age at which most children don't understand the responsibilities that go with it, have never gotten a job and are still reliant on parents and therefore cannot make an informed decision re…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 09:48 AM
21

Regardless of whether it is a boy or girl, it is still rape and pedophilia on her part. I'm pretty sure it is the law in most places and rightly so. Also, equality is an artificial construct which allows people to set aside differences they cannot control, e.g. sex. Given how our so called 'differences' aren't really all that different in the first place, treating a certain group of people differently is bound to incite resentment and violence and in this case, putting mere technicalities over t…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/19 09:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter