AkumaZ Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
9	So where are all the outraged pussy hat wearing fems now? You really like to add your own context don’t you? Can you find me a sane person saying that “believe women” literally means they can tell no lie? AOC called for Kavanaughs accusers to have their story told Is she not calling for the same here? Because you conveniently skipped that And choosing to support the lesser of two evils that happens to align more so with your political beliefs and goals is not hypocrisy, it’s logic. Unless she has stated that she’ll never support any person with alleged…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/05/20 01:02 AM
3	So where are all the outraged pussy hat wearing fems now? No you’re saying it’s hypocritical of her to criticize Kavanaugh and to say Biden’s allegations should be investigated and talked about while still saying she will support his run for President There is nothing hypocritical about this, because again, these things are mutually exclusive There is nothing she said or I said about excusing behavior. There is nothing contrary to the “believe all women” catchphrase present here, because it does not mean “all women tell the truth about rape and assault…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/05/20 12:49 AM
-8	So where are all the outraged pussy hat wearing fems now? These two things are not mutually exclusive Particularly when Biden’s opponent is far worse on sexual assault allegation front by a factor of 20-30x Edit: sorry meant that these things are mutually exclusive	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/05/20 12:33 AM
2	#himtoo What does "Devil's Triangle" and "Boofing" mean then? It's a fucking yearbook comment from 36 years ago. Don't be ridiculous. I've already answered this, are you even reading my posts? Again, its not even about the content of it, he was point blank asked what these meant and he gave horseshit answers What? Where? https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538060501?ns=prod/accounts-wsj Reported by an aide, contradicted by Kavanaugh's opening statement Did you actually watch the hearing…	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 09:38 PM
2	#himtoo There’s no cryptic meaning to Devil’s Triangle and boofing, and there’s misunderstanding or misinterpreting of him being misleading/lying in his past It was also reported that he did in fact watch Fords testimony after claiming he did not, either bad reporting or again another lie Regardless, he comes off as a liar regarding these things that should be meaningless to lie about, and his outbursts are borderline childish and not befitting of a judge in the highest court. Even if you can 100% dismi…	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 06:09 PM
2	#himtoo Yea i'm thinkin neither of us are going to convince the other of anything here, just different premises we're operating on, you think i'm performing mental gymnastics and honestly I think you're being intellectually dishonest To be clear, the yearbook evidence and questions and the thing i've pointed out are not evidence of what he is being accused, however his handling of those questions to me establishes a pattern of dishonesty Here is one example of him being deliberately misleading or po…	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 04:12 PM
1	#himtoo I don’t believe a sworn statement is enough, if it is then Swetniks accusation would be taken more seriously FBI background would allow everyone to be interviewed by professionals to at least gather info. The initial background and even all his previous ones are not sufficient if there was not until this point a reference to such behavior. The FBI isn’t some supernaturally powered organization that uncovers every stone and person in your life’s history, they operate under what knowledge they hav…	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 03:11 PM
1	#himtoo I dunno, an investigation would be nice No the FBI background checks Kavanaugh has had up to this point are not sufficient, if they didn’t talk to anyone that would mention anything like that it would never appear on their radar. Having been apart of someone’s federal background check they aren’t interviewing obscure acquaintances without cause so this would allow them to ask specific people specific questions and ascertain more of what is true Especially given the latest accusation is coming fr…	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 04:23 AM
0	#himtoo Yes, and honestly both testimonies came off as believable	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 03:39 AM
0	#himtoo Like I said, this is the second time with the last one being nearly 30 years ago, Thomas was in ‘91 Still doesn’t answer why nothing of this sort happened to Gorsuch	/r/MensRights	28/09/18 02:37 AM
1	#himtoo You’re confusing two separate allegations The one you listed as sounding ridiculous is the most recent made by a named accuser who is a government employee and submitted it via sworn testimony yesterday Also if what you say is true regarding throwing accusations purely for partisan purposes, why is it that this is only the second time this has ever happened with a Supreme Court nominee? The last time being close to 30 years ago. Why didn’t this happen to Gorsuch? A seat democrats likely would’ve…	/r/MensRights	27/09/18 09:31 PM