TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlC2 Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by AlC2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Sperm bank solves all these problems, unless they planned to collect child support and alimony while posturing about being a strong and independant woman on tumblr.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:56 PM
–

On the other hand, they claim injustice when the typical grad in English litterature doesn't make as much as a STEM grad. Oh and, what if STEM graduates decided to have the same elitist attitude and started rejecting English grads on the basis that they don't have a real degree ? Pretty sure these dumb guardianistas couldn't take it the same way they dish it out.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:56 AM
8

Dear Cenk, welcome to the club of the Deplorables, a.k.a Bernie Bros, Gamergate mysogynists, pro status-quo conservatives, MRA supremacists, republican xenophobes, STEM privileged nerds, manspreading mansplainers, Tim Hunt, Matt Taylor, the Yeti, the Loch Ness monster and even more deplorables.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:35 AM
1

Some people are just looking for conflict, and when they don't find it, they create it.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:39 PM
1

The funny thing about these feminists tooting their horn is, when you remind them about STEM even without a fraction of the condescension they employ in their self-congratulatory articles, they suddenly all switch to victim/grievance mode as they always do when the sole act of posturing doesn't get them what they want.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:18 AM
1

"So Molly M. King and her colleagues at Stanford University, the University of Washington and New York University set out to find how often this so-called "self-citation" happens" Aaaaand do they know why people cite themselves ? To boost their egos ? Nope WaPo, it's because, if you don't cite yourself when you invoke a result you previously established in an older paper (with the intention to use them to construct new results for an example), you can be accused of republishing the same result n…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 11:14 PM
1

It's actually simpler : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition For an example : If you get a watermelon in the face, then you'll have a headache. Contraposition : If you don't have a headache, then you didn't get a watermelon in the face. The message is just a concealed aggression. What it really means is "if you're not a feminist, then you don't believe in equality for women aka URE A CHAUVINIST PIG WHO THINK WOMYN SHOULD BE PRISONEERS OF THE HOLY PATRIARCHICAL KITCHEN SHAME ON U".
/r/MensRights01/08/16 10:48 PM
3

This is just projection. As I've said before, social justice and feminism are to assholes what a driver's licence is to people who want to drive : A licence to be an asshole. Feminist theory doesn't mean shit, it's just a device that enables them to keep asserting they are right in the most grotesque situations.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 08:05 AM
43

I think it's unfair from Milo to speak about the researchers the way he does. I don't care if researchers have opinions I don't agree with (opinions like feminism) as long as they do their research with good methodology and honesty. I can't talk about the methodology used in this experiment but I'd hold their honesty in high regards for two reasons : 1) They admit what they intended to find 2) They actually publish the results despite not finding what they expected instead of sweeping it under t…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 07:09 AM
10

A dude getting unilaterally no-fault divorced and paying 75% of his income in child support, alimony and taxes is fair. (this is basically what brought me to this sub)
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:23 PM
5

"Lisa Wade : Professor of Sociology, Occidental College". We should hold a database with these. It would be a great public service if people knew in advance what kind crap they are getting themselves into by signing in there.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 10:49 AM
1

Intersectionality is the most intellectually refined finding of feminism until now. It is the extraordinary idea that an effect may have several different causes ! (lol...I'm sorry, I just can't) Now it's the new classy way for feminists to identify each other in the crowd by waving around their codified intellect : "Are you intersectional ?", "hell yes I'm intersectional as fuck", "waoow, we all PhDs in gender studies in this room, we can get the echo chamber started and we'll turn water into w…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:32 PM
1

Feminism is to assholes what a driver's licence is to people who want to drive : A licence to be an asshole.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:12 PM
2

One of the pitfalls in social science is verifiability. I think it would be an exaggeration to say that social sciences are unverifiable. I would say claims in social science done well and ethically are usually verifiable, but verifying them is expensive and time consuming. This characteristic makes barriers in social science much softer against dishonest people with agendas, because unmasking somebody who's making stuff up is very Furthermore, people with enough legitimate credentials to oust t…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/16 09:22 PM
13

What we learned in this video : Sociology department at UVA is crap.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:01 PM
3

For anybody worried about how bad his health actually went, other pictures from other articles show that he didn't lose any of his eyes. Not defending the mother though, but I hope this info could partially relieve readers.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:45 PM
10

"Domestic abuse requires one to have institutional power, Without that, you can't abuse someone (hence I have a licence to be a gigantic asshole)." That's some real feminist theory at work. I'll say it again. Feminist theory is to assholes what a driver's licence is to people who want to drive : A licence to be an asshole. What has feminist theory ever accomplished besides producing a huge crop of assholes and laundering their abhorrent behavior ? Oh yeah, it's called intersectionality, it is th…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:16 PM
1

Sort of. A Kafka trap is a sort of unfalsifiable accusation and they indeed use that kind of rhetoric. However, more broadly speaking, an unfalsifiable accusation doesn't have to be a Kafka trap (in example : invoking the lived experience, accusations of micro-aggressions, asserting the existence of something evil but that the evil something is so deep rooted that it can't ever be brought to observation). Accusing somebody of having a reprehensible mindset without any substantial reason is an un…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:50 PM
4

You're absolutely right that SJWs do a whole lot of projecting, and the entitlement thing demonstrably has it as a component. I have few points to add. Social justice has been invaded by people who want a license to behave like assholes, want to fight from the highground with a thin veneer of moral superiority for easy glory, and consequently need to scapegoat other people with bogus charges to appear to have a legitimate motive to fight for. "Male entitlement" is just another bogus charge of ha…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:31 AM
5

500k to track micro-aggressions ? Not bad. Now how much does it cost to get proof on tapes what sjw/feminists are a bunch of assholes who would pour buckets of macro-aggression into your face without hesitation ? It's funny how it's always up to the same people to demonstrate perfect behavior and prove the non-existence of nano-aggressions on their behalf (nevermind that you can't prove the general non-existence of something, but heh, feminist assholes love to throw unfalsifiable accusations and…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:54 PM
4

I've got even better than that. Feminists will tell you how you're conflating them with the crazies when you're pointing out their excessive behaviors, and the logical consequence of it is that - while they don't bother cleaning up their ranks - they wouldn't interfere when somebody else does. Well, Christina Hoff Sommers calls out the crazies on their factual inaccuracies. She ostensibly addresses them specifically since she advocates herself as a factual feminist, so she's not really painting …
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:54 PM
1

Here we see a bunch of feminsts who think they've just found some kind of genius novel rhetoric. In fact, they seem so delighted in their discovery that they put it to use for almost 3 minutes straight. Well, tough luck feminists, this kind of rhetoric is nothing new, it's pretty basic, it's called the "loaded question" by the way. Nice try.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:34 AM
–

Spot on. Feminists and SJWs have a pattern of attacking people with backgrounds associated with a low social capital (gamers are a very good example at the moment). In fact, a closer examination (I could easily write volumes about it) about the way they go at it shows in pretty much every way possible that feminists have zero interest in science, close to zero interest in the women who actually do science instead of playing up the victimhood, and that they are primarily interested in drumming up…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:58 PM
4

I've already seen this "you make it about yourself" rhetoric used in multiple contexts. I don't know what is the context in this post, but this kind of rhetoric itself deserves some attention imo. Three points : 1) Law #3 : SJWs always project. 2) SJWs favorite activity is attacking people. When they pretend to talk about issues, they often seize the opportunity to make unsolicited statements on your behalf (being a male is life on easy mode, men are essentially rapists, you play video games wit…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 08:33 PM
–

Huh, am I the only one who sees this as a cartoon mocking feminists ? Moonsplaining (an intentional misuse of feminist jargon I presume), the croquenbouche thing and the next week teaser are a pretty clear giveaway signs imo.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:04 PM
–

https://archive.is/3NCys Just to keep the record straight about who's ready to side with a bunch of delinquents at the expense of society.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:09 PM
19

I really want to believe that I would at least have the decency to not be stupid enough to parade asking out loud "ohey where have all the good women gone" and that I would not pretend to not understand why women would refuse to co-sign anything with a man followed with a less than stellar record. I really want to believe I wouldn't sink that low.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:25 AM
11

Maybe I could have been sympathetic to them in the past, but when I see who's pushing for more things like this and this, I'll just kiss them a Darwin Award.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:45 PM
–

I've been lectured by other progressives, by pessimistic conservatives, and most of all by feminists who simply ignore the arguments that make sense and focus instead on incredibly specific language I use that doesn't relate to the matter at hand. Aha, I'm pretty sure I've seen this modus operandi somewhere. Basically, if they don't like you, you ooze sexism/racism/misogyny by every pore of your skin no matter what you do, according to their definitions. On the other hand, when feminists tweet a…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:18 PM
–

Yeah, "could have". It could have gone also much better if everybody were actually doing their work instead of being asleep. And guess what, engineers still work to reduce the probability of having disasters like this happening. They also work to make the operational costs as small as possible for the environment. The fact that you "don't like the idea of nuclear power" doesn't change the fact that most alternatives to nuclear power are horrendous in comparison for anybody who understands probab…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 09:43 AM
–

Among the vast majority of engineers and even among people from many other professions, nuclear engineers are probably the ones who are the least likely to have shitting up the environment as an acceptable option, just sayin'.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 09:02 AM
3

"Are women even interested in studying science?". That's an interesting question. I can at least answer it for the feminist busybodies who keep writing about the issue. I won't include the links but they are very easy to find with google or any search on their medias. Now I'm browsing Jezebel to get some numbers. I perform a search about the Tim Hunt hooplah and I get an article with more than 85k views. While these people are very busy blasting Tim, they could show a little bit of interest towa…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:51 PM
7

Well of course, #3 is more of an option than a hard rule that would have to be followed everytime. You have to weight the pros (being looked as a team guy, subsequent favors, tacitly gaining an arsenal for blackmail) and cons. There are cases where the cons are so heavy that it's never going to be worth it. For an extreme and real example let's say, you don't want to be backtracked as the engineer who caused the Deepwater Horizon oil spill for faulty calculations when your higher ups are the one…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 01:15 PM
5

One of the origins of this push, I suspect, is that feminists have the dogma that women are just better at everything than men besides comitting suicide. Obviously, they hate to be reminded, as a counter-example, that men are the ones bringing most of the discoveries and innovations to the world. So instead of re-examinating their claims, they try to push some explanation for these counter-examples that would preserve their dogma. The most popular one is : There is some big boogeyman in STEM tha…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:22 PM
–

While this new manspreading hysteria pooped out by feminists is clearly intended to target men (which, I recognize, is totally omitted in the video), feminists are not the ones giving tickets in subways, the patrolling cops are. So in practical terms, people of colors are the ones getting shafted by this. Cops being incentivized to act heavy-handed are a problem in America and whatever (in this case, women getting tickets) brings attention to this issue will benefit men on the side.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:39 PM
5

Getting cleaned out in family court for THIS ? 11/10 #worthit, bring it on \o/
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 11:38 AM
14

Imagine all the shitstorm for a second if the cop was a male doing this to schoolgirls. I'd bet he'd be in jail.
/r/MGTOW25/01/15 03:29 PM
3

So few weeks ago we had the NYC*** street "harrassment" video, and now this stupid video ? Sounds like somebody wants to annoy us with some new laws. I'd be curious to see who's paying these fraudulent would-be documenters behind the shadows for the dirty job. ***(Read "Harlem" for NYC. Btw I could easily get vastly more spectacular results with gender reversed. I could just walk down a street with prostitutes, collect clips and pretend that examples with regular women were equally occurent but …
/r/MGTOW14/11/14 11:08 PM
1

Ban men from stuff like women studies, ban women from STEM fields for their own safety unless they are willing to wear a plate mail every day in class. Win-win, problem solved and happy feminist moms !
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:45 PM
1

"I will have to note that some men are good allies. And all of those things are true! And all of you good allies get cookies! But honestly I’m tired of handing out cookies to people just because they’re being decent fucking human beings." Not an ally = Not a decent human being, aha. And then : "So please, men who are reading this – instead of the usual knee-jerk reaction towards these types of posts, instead of rolling your eyes and saying, “great, another feminist shitting on men,” I’m asking y…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter