TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlJahFearsYa Archive

View 6 posts and 18 comments by AlJahFearsYa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yes, and it's part of a disturbing context. See, for example http://www.friesian.com/sommers.htm
/r/MensRights31/07/10 07:24 AM
2

American family court, of course, thrives on adversaries in conflict and has no interest in lessening those circumstances.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 03:01 PM
2

Indeed. You say, ...the most angry citizens who would support legislation harshly punishing false rape accusers. Along a similar line, another type of legislation which is needed is a legal punishment for false claims of domestic violence. As it stands now, there is no penalty. I know this from my research and also personal experience. And, when there's no punishment for false accusations (rape or otherwise), there's obviously not the needed deterrent.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 11:25 PM
2

While men, and by that I mean you, your brothers, fathers, sons and friends get bent over and raped in openly rigged family courts, you look the other way. I've often had this thought. It has amazed me many times that more men aren't just absolutely outraged by what happens in family court.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 11:51 AM
1

contact with the biological father deters premature sexual maturity in their daughters (pheromone-based type of thing) I believe I initially read about this in Save The Males by Kathleen Parker. However, David Blankenhorn discusses it here: http://www.propositionsonline.com/html/dads__daughters_forge_key_bond.html see also this: http://books.google.com/books?id=mINaedDRF4EC&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=fathers+pheromones+daughters+sexual+development&source=bl&ots=REK-OH_sUJ&sig=aXgD7X7RQNzDiGkTSV2ZW3ti…
/r/MensRights25/06/10 04:24 AM
1

The lesbian parents study is looking at homes with two female parents versus homes with a male and a female parent. Yes. Let me go through my books. I've read research which addresses your point. The topic really goes beyond how it's being presented. For example, (drawing from memory)... contact with the biological father deters premature sexual maturity in their daughters (pheromone-based type of thing)... contact with fathers actually influences the way the child's brain develops etc. Those tw…
/r/MensRights24/06/10 10:15 PM
1

Yes inabook.... good point... thanks!
/r/MensRights24/06/10 09:28 PM
3

On second thought, you are making an excellent point here: Well, lesbians choose to have children, very deliberately. Wouldn't that account for the difference? And if so, this study has a solid lesson - children who are wanted grow up to have fewer behavioral problems. Surprise, surprise. I would imagine studying gay male partnerships would show similar results. Indeed. To make this study fairly correlate it would be necessary to compare the lesbian couples' children against those adopted by het…
/r/MensRights24/06/10 03:36 PM
1

Did you read the Pediatrics article in greater depth like you said? Again, without seeing their data I don't know how you know that. Yes, I did read it. It is here: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/peds.2009-3153v1?maxtoshow=&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=lesbian&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT Why do you think it's biased against fathers, rather than towards lesbians? Well, this is one study. There have been numerous studies over the years which c…
/r/MensRights24/06/10 02:35 PM
0

Well, lesbians choose to have children, very deliberately. Wouldn't that account for the difference? Hi. This study was transparently ideological. I comment on that here http://www.daddylawyers.com/2010/06/kids-of-lesbian-parents-are-better-off/ And if so, this study has a solid lesson - children who are wanted grow up to have fewer behavioral problems. Demonstrating that lesson wasn't the intention of the study. They intentionally want to prove that children are better off with lesbian parents.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 01:41 PM
1

…when there’s a general climate that dismisses the importance of fathers… well, sure… what better way to do that then to argue that fathers are entirely unnecessary all together. And, not only that… but children are better off without them.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 01:15 PM
1

Thank you for sharing that story! really... thanks... It's all quite sad I think.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 10:55 PM
1

Can you relate to this?
/r/MensRights08/06/10 07:00 PM
2

This is encouraging. And good timing for me. Just this morning I was thinking about how family court functions in different countries, and this is a good starting point for my research.
/r/MensRights04/06/10 07:53 PM
1

As I'm out of my depth in analyzing search engine programming, let me ask you a friendly question out of curiosity. This is blatantly just an issue of default behaviour. Am I correct in concluding that the default behavior in this case opts for the presumption of a two-letter typo (in this case omission) rather than a missing apostrophe before a final "s" if the two-letter typo omission leads to a query of far greater popularity than the query with the missing apostrophe before the final "s"? I …
/r/MensRights31/05/10 09:30 PM
2

This is blatantly just an issue of default behaviour. I wasn't aiming for a grand, conspiracy theory. I just thought it was interesting. :)
/r/MensRights31/05/10 08:57 PM
2

this isn't news Agreed. I posted it because I find it amusing, and I thought others might also. just do a search for plain “rights movement” and check the related searches. I did as you suggested, and I thank you for suggesting that. Of the eight "Searches related to rights movement" listed, the first one is "women's rights movement." Also listed (among the eight) are "animal rights movement" and "disability rights movement." Granted, there are only eight slots provided...nonetheless, not one of…
/r/MensRights31/05/10 08:53 PM
2

I think you mean that in a fair way, and it's a fair point. I do a lot of Google searches very quickly, and I missed the apostrophe. However, if the search engine programming redirects me for that reason, and it would appear that this is the reason...it is still then redirecting an incorrect construction of a term by presuming another incorrect construction was intended (womens). So, the idea still holds.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 08:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter