TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Alarmed-Telephone-83 Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by Alarmed-Telephone-83 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sure, if there were a hypothetical bigger race that is universally 50% stronger and 50% bigger and responsible for essentially every sexual assault on the smaller race, then yeah I think I would empathise smaller race beong cautious. Note this situation is not analogous to current racism which is not based on marked biological differences but rather history and culture. In return, do you think it is reasonable for parents to be cautious of their children as around strangers? Explain why that is …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:52 AM
1

Can you put women on that same graph for scale?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:45 AM
–

The race analogy is not as strong as you guys think. There is no ethnic group anywhere that can be construed to be as strongly and exclusively associated with threat to another group as men universally are a la women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:44 AM
–

Here's another one for ya that might help. We all know 99.9% of adults (men and women) are not child sexual predators. Does that mean you let your guard down when your child is around an adult you don't know? Would you leave your child alone with a strange adult you don't know? No, because at some level you presume there is a risk of violence, even if it is minute, until you have been shown through getting to know the person that this is not the case. The question isn't whether the judgement is …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:22 AM
6

Just letting you know I love this definition of feminism. Independence is the key concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:57 AM
22

Ummm. Not sure how many women in reality have ever felt that way. Sounds like men need to stop reading bad romance fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 01:22 AM
5

Yeah I think you could luck out into someone who watches little/no porn already but you wpuld be hard pressed to change a pre-existing habit
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 12:18 AM
1

Firstly, i disagree with the premise. A plethora of men ARE following blue pill advice and succeeding. You just dont hear from them because they are, you know, just getting on with their lives. Secondly, the existence of red pill does not prove it is true. What of, in a society that allows free choice, no matter what dating rules people followed, there is a ceiling on what proportion of people pair up? Say the max is 80%, and say blue pill achieves 75%. There are going to be people who dont pair…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 05:58 AM
–

Yo I am not burning him I just disagree with his definition of good woman
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:24 AM
–

'realistic standards' is also questionable in this context, because it is clear that this guy thinks standards that dont include him are 'unrealistic'
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:58 AM
–

I wont be able to engage in debate because I just cant agree with your criteria for good. To.start: why does a woman have to br a virgin to be good, but you dont?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:07 PM
6

I think the 'personally Ive never seen it' IS a valid response when the OP or commenter is trying to make a universal claim from their own experience / TikTok feed. Like one of the entire points of this sub is to use personal and life experience to counterbalannce or reinterpet claims made by people (red or blue or purple ir black) who think they have it all figured out when in reality there are as many courses as there are horses.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 01:42 AM
20

I have to say, the scenario you describe of your cousin sounds like my absolute worst nightmare lol. The person you are in a relationship with is the person in your life that you spend the most time with and have the most conversations with. Why on earth would you want that to be with a completely submissive doormat who acquiesces your every thought no matter how dumb? How do you grow as a person? How do you learn? It would be like talking to nobody but chatGPT your whole life, what a snooze fes…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:03 AM
1

Wholesome good boys arent necessarily getting ONS sex. But i would argue wholesome good boys can maintain relationships better than average and since most sex happens in relationships they are getting more sex overall. In fact part of the reason thesse guys might not seem to be picking up as much as hot assholes is because the good boys arent even trying - they dont need to because they arent single
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:38 AM
1

Mate if you dont want to be lectured by blue pillers why are you posting in purple pill
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:29 AM
–

"Sometimes I'll see a woman in their 30s+ with a guy less attractive than them, but that's because they had their fun with attractive dudes in their 20s and now they're focusing on their future" --- how could you possibly know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 11:19 PM
3

How do you know that as a Gen Xer? Please dont say TikTok
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 11:15 PM
3

What does 'antisemitic' mean to you? I interpret it to mean 'racist'
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:55 AM
16

Mate i personally do not believe i ccan distinguish those things on a first date
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:54 AM
9

Since when is having a drink, telling jokes, finding out someones interests, and flirting 'performing like an organ grinder monkey'?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 06:16 AM
4

You didnt care that your date was openly antisemitic?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 06:14 AM
29

I dont understand your reasoning here. Are you saying that us men are 100% capable of percieving someones essence, their core, their being, on a 2hour date regardless of how nervous / anxious / tired they are?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 06:12 AM
6

Booo
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:23 AM
3

I think it is also worth noting that part of what he is saying is that there isnt a 1:1 correspondence between attraction to an online dating profile and attraction to that person in real life (e.g. the ex gf he talks about)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:39 AM
3

Great response
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 12:43 AM
5

Exactly. The purpose isnt necessarily to meet someone at the hibby group itself, but to expand your social circle in a natural way with flow on invites to other activities or social functions - moreover, at these other activities or social functions you are part of a group, and inherently more trustable than a single guy hanging alone - you also have more to do (chat to your friends) than just cold approach women over and over
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 12:36 AM
33

Even if i were to accept your premise that a team of two needs a clear leader, why must it be the man?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:08 AM
0

Oh wow that last point of yours would give me the heebie jeebies haha
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:52 AM
3

Pecs? Chest?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:00 AM
4

Nice tits?? Are you a bot?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 12:25 AM
1

Huh I guess every man I know is in the top 20% then
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:11 PM
1

Maybe it is just men and women equilibriating from 50 years ago when a woman couldnt get a date unless someone literally approached her on the street
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:11 PM
0

Yeah i also dont understand what you are trying to say here. Is your claim that 80% of ALL MEN (and by extension, women) will either never find a relationship or are 'settled for' and will have failed and/or sexless? I also dont agree with the premise that outwardly attractive people wont end up in dead bedrooms. I would argue that the other traits you discuss as 'post-screening' - kindness, empathy, etc. ' - are much more impirtant to long term sexual compatability. No matter how hot someone is…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:49 AM
0

Do you mean men are staying virgins for longer compared to past men? Or compared to women now? I.e. this data that you are citing what is the rate of virginity in current men compared to current women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 02:41 AM
1

I mean, in general PPD is am evidence free zone where we all sling anecdotes back and forth. A brief search fins this study: "Sexual desire declined with advancing age; overall, men reported more frequent and stronger sexual desire than women. However, there were important interactions between gender and age indicating an earlier decline among women"; https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui_locales=en&scope=affiliations+alm_identity_ids+merged_users+openid+session_level+settings&r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:18 AM
3

Alternative hypotheses: insatiable lust can only be felt once. Or, insatiable lust only happens prior to full brain development. Analogously: you can never recreat that 'first crush' feeling. Doesnt mean that you think the first object of your desire is the only 'true' object, it just means we as humans feel things most intensely the first time we feel them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 02:34 AM
1

This is the right answer. Dating IS the signal that gets stronger the longer it goes. The time cost is huge. The emotional cost is huge. Assuming a monogamous relationship, the opportunity cost is huge.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 02:30 AM
–

I would wager most single mothers arent single mothers FROM BIRTH. Humans are optimists. They think things are gonna work out. Then dad splits when the kids are little - what, they should put them up for adoption then??
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 11:26 PM
1

Perfect response
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:03 PM
–

Y'all dont have Movember?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 12:47 AM
2

Also. You completely underate 'allowed to cry'. Men two generstions ago were emotionally stunted who could only deal with frustration and dissappintment by silently drinking amd getting into fights. Give me hugs with bros and R U OK mate anyday
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:37 AM
6

This is what feminism has achieved for me, a man - a partnership with a woman who is in every way my intellectualy equal and in some ways my superior; who is well educated and confident; fulfils all my needs for friendship, as well as companionship and physical affection; who can independently go out in public and get a job, drive a car, and socialise, without needing me ti be there to hold her hand; who is in every way an equal partner in our relationship and not some dependent quasi child who …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:32 AM
1

What OP is arguing is that Tom isn't less desirable in the medium to long term. Women's short term actions aren't matching thier medium term preferences because they act passively and follow the crowd (whether you think this behaviour is socially taught or innate or a mixture of both is up to you - personally i find it hard to believe it isn't at least partially socially constructed)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 02:54 AM
0

Whether or not some women were able to individually have equal or dominant relationships with their partner, the fact is that legally and culturally they were completely subservient. Rape not illegal within marriage. Voting rights much later. Unable to independently inheret property. Etc. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 11:17 PM
11

You are missing the micro level. Yes, in society broadly, poor men served at the whims of the rich. But after a long day slaving in the fields, the average male serf / peasant / miner would dominate their wife at home - in terms of decision making, sexual relations, domestic service, the lot. That's the revolution of the last 50-100 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 01:01 AM
5

Yes you do need to trot it out if you are going to claim 'scientific evidence'. Please proceed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 01:12 AM
14

What motivates a man to marry a woman who has previously had sex with other people likely has absolutely nothing to do with her previous sexual history and a lot more to do with do they like each other, do they have interesting conversations, are they attracted to each other, do they make each other laugh etc. etc. etc. If you start from a place where you think it is normal for your partner to have previously had sex with other people, then that is just a given and you just forget about it becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 01:11 AM
–

I was specifically arguing against his argument that decentering women in the way he described will be a helpful strategy for young men who have struggled to find relationships. I think it is probably helpful to decentre women in the sense that you shouldn't treat every woman you meet as a deity descended from heaven who demands worship and in return can bestow favours. I think it is unhelpful to decentre women in the sense of not even deigning to treat them as potential friends. Helpful/unhelpf…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:02 PM
1

Not sure what that acronym means, but there is no way in hell even most women conform to red pill models (although I will allow the number may be higher in specific contexts such as online dating, although even then the more likely explanation is that status obsessed women are more often single and therefore remain on apps longer, making it appear they represent more of the population than they actually do)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:14 AM
6

Undoubtedly it was a representatove sample of the overall population of women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 05:34 AM
5

I meant most men are boring to men. Most women are boring to women. Most men are boring to women. Most women are boring to men. Most people are boring to most other people and that's fine. We all have different interests. But you gotta keep an open mind on who you are going to click with and not prejudge someone as vapid because they have a hoo-hah.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:46 AM
6

Your premises are flawed - the last 100 years of unrestrained economic growth have demonstrated that wealth is not finite. In a rights context, both men and women have far more rights now than they did 200 years ago e.g. free speech, vote, private property, habeas corpus, etc - I suppose there is no empirical rebuttal of not doing something unless theres something in it for you. All I know is that altruism makes you happier, it makes society function much more smoothly, and if you are constantly…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:43 AM
5

Plus most women are not on tinder so it is not a representative sample
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:37 AM
7

The problem is when you universalism the behaviour of some women you know and use it to create an explanatory model that explains ALL women. Even if you believed that the red pill explained the behaviour of 80% of women (for the sake of this arguement) then isn't it still worth being open to relationships with all women to at least have a chance of meeting someone who isn't status / looks / Chad / whatever obsessed? If such women exist (and they do) you are NEVER going to meet them by completely…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:35 AM
3

Agree - what is the point if they aren't your best friend? They are the person you spend by far the most time in your life with
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:30 AM
2

You could say the same about most men. Unless you think your ideology is accurate for 100% of women (which imo is crazy for any explanatory model of social behaviour) it is going to be worth keeping an open mind when meeting new people, including women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 04:29 AM
19

Is there a question here? In response to your call to decentre women, I think you are half right. You have to stop treating women as a completely seperate gender for men and start realising that there are many commonalities between men and women. You shouldn't help a woman because she is a woman, or pander to her whims because she is a woman, and treat every woman as a potential sexual partner and nothing else. But nor should you refuse to be friends with any woman or think about any woman! You …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 03:54 AM
0

Unnecessary ad hominem
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:42 AM
12

Raising kids is thankless labour in the sense that it isn't recognised by society. No, your boss doesn't care for you and can suck. But in return for your labour they give you cash which can be exchanged for goods and services. Yes, in return for raising children you get their love and devotion and warm squidgy feelings. But that doesn't put food on the table or a roof over your head. It doesn't let you take a vacation or subscribe to Netflix. It is thankless in that sense. Women don't have kids…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:50 AM
7

In the same way that you say now, 'paternity leave is not accepted, and many expect men to continue to work through kids' -- well, 60 years ago women re-entering the workforce post kids was not accepted, and men expected their wives to stay at home and raise their families. Why did that change? Women drove the change. They wanted to enter the workforce. So men need to do the same and demand to stay at home and look after the kids if that is what they want. Change social expectations. Why hasn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:53 AM
1

An addit: your use of the word 'guarantee' is also problematic; there is no situation in life in which you can guarantee an ongoing relationship with another human being -- friend, family, or lover. That is just how life works unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:38 AM
2

"I think that's laughably naive. The effort it takes for women to change partners is so low that there is nothing you can do to keep her attention with any sort of guarantee" I'll preface by saying I don't really agree with most of your viewpoint, but I think this step is the biggest logical flaw. Once you are in a committed relationship with somebody, changing to a new partner is a massive barrier, including for women. You lose: - The time you have already spend getting to know the other person…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:37 AM
73

It kind of sounds like you WERE calling her dumb though? Like you have compared her to a rooster that can't realy fly and in fact failed spectacularly, but claims it can. She had understood that and in fact extended the metaphor, correctly deducing that you were calling her a chicken brain. She's acting insulted because you insulted her. You can't get out of jail by claiming "it was all an analogy". The point of any analogy is to illustrate a point that you actually think.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:55 PM
1

What I'm saying is that sexual attraction isnt seperate from emotional attraction. I'm not sure where this stat everyone keeps throwing around about women only being attracted to a small percentage of men has come from -- it sounds pretty fake to me -- but even if it is true that most women are only attracted to PICTURES of a small percentage of men, that's very different from saying that they aren't attracted to a much larger proportion of men once they get to know them. I know the reverse is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:55 AM
7

This either/ or dichotomy is such bullshit. Life isnt a game of fuck / kill / marry. Most men AND women on committed relationships enjoy the company of the other person AND enjoy sex with them. The two things aren't usually seperate. Does this change over time in most relationships? Duh. That's not a suprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 11:22 AM
3

The difference, OBVIOUSLY, is that novels aren't visual.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 05:42 AM
5

This comment in no way answers the question directed to you, which was to justify your claim that specific women (prominent feminists) were commonly sex offenders
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 12:41 AM
–

I dont agree with this, it seems to imply that women see attractiveness as the only thing they have to offer in a relationship. Many women--like many men--have healthy self-esteem and a realistic self-perception and realise that they are not as physically attractive as, say, Margot Robbie, and since we all value honesty they have no worries about hearing this once in a while. It is far from GAME OVER in the relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:24 AM
3

Yeah this is the part of your OP I disagree with most - I feel like in my (mixed gender) friendship group, the girls are ALWAYS recommending 5he guys to mutual friends, even if it is indirectly like giving them 1:1 time at mutual parties/ social events
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:19 AM
24

This is my experience too - all the women I've dated have turned into romantic relationships from run- in friendships. Physical / sexual attraction came after intellectual connection (for both parties). But as with literally every case, it depends on the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:13 AM
1

??? If women didn't have any ideological diversity wouldn't they all vote the same way? Fall on the same side of contentious issues e.g. Israel/Palestine, Big Government, etc.? Be all the same religion? I do not understand this point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:48 AM
3

If IQ is normally distributed then then AT LEAST half of people should be within 2 standard deviations, and for the average person 95% of people should be within 2 standard deviations.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:45 AM
1

Lots of men and women care deeply for one another and have mutually beneficial relationships not based on exploitation. I'm sorry your experience is otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 02:26 AM
1

Exactly, the trajectory of essentially all occupational health reforms (and other public health measures - road safety etc.) has been fewer men dying. Indeed you could even argue that the relatively few wars waged since Vietnam is a sign of society valuing the lives of men
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 02:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter