TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlcoholicsAlarmist Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by AlcoholicsAlarmist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:30 AM
2

Well, if this is true Tacitus makes use of the official sources of the Roman state: the acta senatus (the minutes of the session of the Senate) and the acta diurna populi Romani (a collection of the acts of the government and news of the court and capital). He also read collections of emperors' speeches, such as Tiberius and Claudius. He is generally seen as a scrupulous historian who paid careful attention to his sources. The minor inaccuracies in the Annals may be due to Tacitus dying before h…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:28 AM
2

I'm being swayed.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:27 AM
0

Tacitus makes use of the official sources of the Roman state: the acta senatus (the minutes of the session of the Senate) and the acta diurna populi Romani (a collection of the acts of the government and news of the court and capital). He also read collections of emperors' speeches, such as Tiberius and Claudius. He is generally seen as a scrupulous historian who paid careful attention to his sources. The minor inaccuracies in the Annals may be due to Tacitus dying before he had finished (and th…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:26 AM
1

Well.. not in the West.. I understand there are other cultures which are still trying to live in the 9th century.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:17 AM
1

The historicity of Jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical figure. It concerns not just the issue of "what really happened", based upon the context of the time and place, but also the issue of how modern observers can come to know "what really happened".[1] A second issue is closely tied to historical research practices and methodologies for analyzing the reliability of primary sources and other historical evidence. It also considers the question…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 07:11 AM
2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/?utm_term=.54446f074445 "The first problem we encounter when trying to discover more about the Historical Jesus is the lack of early sources. The earliest sources only reference the clearly fictional Christ of Faith. These early sources, compiled decades after the alleged events, all stem from Christian authors eager to promote Christianity – which gives us reason to que…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 06:52 AM
3

Oh boy, you'll have to prove that one to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 06:46 AM
11

Jesus's crucifixion is a story but witch burning is a historical fact. Scary shit, religion. To be perfectly honest though, human ignorance is the real scary thing in this equation. - in this case the ignorance being a lack of scientific knowledge giving leeway to even the possibility of witches. The past, before we were legitimately "scientifically literate," was a strange and fucked up place. History shows that people are capable of believing literally anything and that's a scary fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 05:37 AM
3

I agree. Too bad the stat they keep droning on about isn't comparing the pay of two people working the same job. It's total income for both sexes. Men make more because more men occupy higher paying jobs. I mean in the real world if you let people do what they want you're going to get certain groups occupying certain jobs more than others because we don't live in a fairy tale land where each sex desires every job equally.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter