Alcuperone Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere Are men judged for being single, really? Wild question, I know - because they very much are - but are they, really? Specifically relevant is where all that judgment comes from. Tends to be people who hold other draconic beliefs about men, such as that they must make mad money or never have an emotion. Now, should the opinions of these people hold value? That's the important question. I'm sure you can answer it for yourself. In short, no, it's not easy. However, nothing worth having in life comes…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/07/26 01:43 PM
-1	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere Right, I'm sure people being victimised by domestic violence is some kind of gotcha here, but I don't see it and don't really want to, so I'll just leave this alone. Anyway, you say you agree with me, that seeking a relationship just to have a relationship isn't healthy, but I'm not sure you do? Because you still reiterate how wanting something from a relationahip instead of just wanting a relationship (i.e., having standards for what kind of partner you want) makes things harder for men, and th…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/07/26 04:45 PM
-3	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere Nah, it's not some lie detector, it's just that "looking good, susan" meme. Going for sex only is very visible, so unless you're charismatic and attractive (because people, on average, like having sex with attractive people) it's going to be an uphill battle. Though I'm not sure what exactly does domestic violence have to do with it. Anyway, I think you're talking a bit past me, because what you mean when you say 'standards' isn't the same I do. This whole idea that standards make it harder for …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/07/26 07:43 AM
0	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere Right, I think you're having a different conversation, or, perhaps, I am. I don't think we're talking about standards just for before the first conversation, at least I'm not.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/07/26 07:20 AM
0	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere You know what, fair point. It is, in fact, me being a combative asshole who needs to learn how to read. I think the point I raised holds merit, but I chose the words I chose, and they were wrong, so I'm going to cede it. Basic 'charisma' is what I'd call being able to hold a conversation - not being a brick that's actively making you work harder to keep a conversation going. Granted, what you're describing there is a step above basic charisma, but it's still a normal thing normal people do? Havi…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/07/26 07:13 AM
-13	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere First off, you did imply that women's standards are bad. When you use words such as "delusional", the message doesn't get erased because you say "but it's ok tho!" afterwards. Maybe you didn't mean to put that message forward, and that's cool, so maybe this is just a learning experience on how to not get yourself misunderstood. Or maybe I'm just a combative asshole about it. The truth is probably between the two. Onto the main point, though. I didn't put forward charisma and a job as the only th…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	15/07/26 07:26 PM
-24	I think Leftists might be responsible for the rise of Manosphere Are you serious? Rhetorical question, I know you're serious, but I just had to say it. I don't think you intended to, but you perfectly displayed why these ominous "leftists" of yours are calling men's loneliness a self-inflicted problem. If your only standards are that she is female and attractive to you (paraphrasing here, because plenty of men find fat women attractive), then you're not looking for a partner, just someone to have sex with. And women can tell when that happens, and they don't …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	15/07/26 05:41 PM
0	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. So, in your opinion, there is nothing more to feminism than hating men?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/06/26 10:21 AM
-2	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. Really, you've surveyed every charity worker who identifies as feminist and they all tried their best to stop men's shelters from being established in Australia, Canada, and wherever 'etc.' is? And you also reviewed the research of every scholar who investigates inequality and identifies as feminist, and they all unanimously agree on reducing the male population to 30%? That must have taken so much work. Have you kept a report of this anywhere, so that I might read it and educate myself? God, th…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/06/26 08:42 AM
-1	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. So, when a feminist hates men because she's been harassed and abused by them, assigns blame and shame to the all men for the suffering she has endured at the hands of some men, and just in general doesn't want anything to do with them any more, she's delusional and hurting people who have never had anything to do with what happened to her. But when you hate feminists because you've been harassed and abused by them, assign blame and shame to all of them for the suffering you have endured at the h…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/06/26 08:31 AM
-1	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. Right. The first thing I want to say to underline the rest of what I'm going to say is that left-wing movements tend to center individualised empowerment. Not really inherently an issue, since empowerment is kind of the point, however being left-wing tends to correlate with being more educated, and being more educated tends to correlate with better knowledge, which means that left-wing people tend to have a better idea on how and why exactly their situation is bad. Thus, they have a better idea …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/06/26 07:32 AM
-9	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. Sick. I'd love to take a look at the research you cited in your unfortunate flight too close to the shit sun that is the modteam of that subreddit.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/06/26 01:20 PM
-19	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. Hm, I can't say I frequently write 10-paragraph posts about how I've been mistreated when I don't care. But that's just me. Maybe you're built different. Either way, yes. You've correctly identified that there's no point trying to argue with someone who has, before any evidence, decided what the truth is. Waste of time and energy, and it's not like you're even leaving anything behind for someone else to read, because it'll just get deleted. When I saw that same exact post you're talking about, I…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/06/26 01:15 PM
-35	The r/comics subreddit is moderated by radical feminists who claim that misandry only exists in theory, as does racism towards white people. It got me banned. So, you saw someone with power telling you not to argue about something, you proceeded to argue, and then got that power exercised over you, and are now surprised and upset? 'Dead Dove Do Not Eat' moment. To answer your final question - yes. I'll take your question at face value disregarding that it doesn't reckon much with the reality of the British monarchy (most monarchies, especially late-stage 19th-20th century ones, didn't leave the monarch with that much power). Just because a woman is in…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/06/26 12:53 PM
4	Conscription Horror in Ukraine -and what you can do about it. Russian propaganda bot. Seriously, a nation is desperately trying to fight a war, and some dumbass on the internet is calling them the baddies for doing so. Why are they fighting that war?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/01/26 09:52 AM
1	(CMV) There's no reason why male-only mandatory conscription is not sexist I wrote a long-ass reply reiterating my arguments from yet another angle, hoping that maybe that would make you understand, but.... fuck it. I've played chess against a pidgeon before, I'm done having this reddit-ass conversation. It's been nice, but I'm not going to keep engaging in good faith if you're going to willfully misinterpret or outright ignore what I'm saying because it's difficult to refute. Pardon the sardon if you can, I'm out of patience, but I offer a few parting remarks: Firstly…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/09/25 04:49 PM
1	(CMV) There's no reason why male-only mandatory conscription is not sexist I think we're discussing entirely different conceptions of war. What you're talking about is more akin to the Korean War, and what I'm talking about is more akin to the current Russo-Ukrainian war. The former was a greatly unpopular, far conflict that did not touch the home front at all, and returning soldiers were greatly affected by the strong anti-war sentiment back home. The latter is a very popuar (well... ish) war for a nation's survival, actively greatly affecting the home front. To say t…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/09/25 09:38 AM
1	(CMV) There's no reason why male-only mandatory conscription is not sexist I'll explain it as it was explained to me. Say, I stab you with a knife. Taken at face value that sounds pretty bad. However, on its own that is just an action, just a fact. It does not inherently carry meaning or a value judgment, because I could equally be a mugger stabbing you to kill you or a surgeon stabbing you to excise a tumour and save your life. The intent behind the action is the part that matters. So, when I say that men-only conscription is better, I could be saying it because I thi…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/09/25 04:19 PM
1	(CMV) There's no reason why male-only mandatory conscription is not sexist Oh boy, a little blast from the past. No bother, though, I like (...sort of) having these discussions. Bit of a stretch for the brain, innit. So, first things first. I know it's a tired trope on the internet, but if you're going to respond to the arguments I made, please respond to the arguments I actually made. I do not claim that men, as a gender, are worthless. I claim that, in the specific instance being discussed, men, on average, are better fit for the needs of the state. It is unfortunate…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/09/25 09:55 PM
-6	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever You're not going to make many friends if your platform is "I want to make other people's lives worse for no tangible gain". And you kind of need friends if you want to enact change.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 03:34 PM
-15	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever Firstly, women. The fuck is up with this 'females' shit? The unfortunate reality is that what you want (i.e., abolished conscription) will not happen until it is no longer necessary, and until there is no more threat of war on Earth, it is necessary. And while it remains necessary, there is no pragmatic reason to make conscription less effective (in short, soldiering is a tough job and testosterone is one hell of a drug, and population birth rate is limited much more by women than by men). No am…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 12:41 PM
-18	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever Make no mistake, I'm definitely in favour of a utopia where everything is great and perfect. Sounds like an amazing place to live. It's just that it's not quite the world we've got. There is, unfortunately, a limited amount of political will to go around, and big changes require lots of it. Some changes are just so big that there's not enough political will to carry them out. Conscription is one of them. It's an unfortunate necessity for a sovereign state to be able to defend its sovereignty, an…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 08:48 AM
-7	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever If a sovereign state needs to be able to defend its sovereignty (it does), it has to be able to resort to desperate measures (it is), in this case in the form of being able to forcibly throw bodies at the aggressor (conscription). Why exactly, at the point of engaging in desperate measures during a fight for its survival, does the state also need to concern itself with being fair instead of just effective? Pragmatically speaking, there's little reason (in terms of military effectiveness) to expa…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 08:32 AM
-1	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever Don't know, create a unified world government? But that's a bit of a dream. Short of that, though, you can't. I've explained why I think so before - you can find it on my profile, no point copypasting paragraphs (tl;dr as long as states need to defend their sovereignty, conscription will exist, and it is pragmatic to limit it to men). It's much better to focus your efforts on things you can actually change.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 08:21 AM
-28	Equal Conscription—a discussion we need more than ever So, is it all injustices you think about in this way? Men have higher suicide rates. This is unacceptable, we must oppress women and make their lives harder so their suicide rates match the men's! Anything else is blatant sexism. Men suffer more workplace deaths. This is unacceptable, we must make sure women are forced into more dangerous jobs so that their workplace deaths match the men's! Anything else is blatant sexism. Does the other way work, too? Women earn less money. This is unacceptable…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 06:24 AM
1	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Yeah, you said this multiple times already. Is there a particular reason you're repeating this to me, specifically?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	20/06/25 06:37 AM
1	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege I don't think the fact that this list is about female privilege that makes it uncomfortable to read (at least amongst people in this subreddit). It's got everything to do with how it is written and that it largely isn't based in reality. I would be equally dismissive of a male privilege list with shit like "male privilege is fighting off attackers on the street" or "male privilege is working on an oilrig."	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/06/25 07:16 AM
2	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege I understand that that's what you think you did here. In another comment somewhere in here I outlined in greater detail why I think this list you wrote didn't achieve your aims. I think you might have listened to too many chronically online "feminists" saying nonsense like "male privilege is being drafted into the army" or "male privilege is having the same genitas as your president". Just because there are people saying shit like that doesn't mean that we must also go down to their level and wa…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/06/25 07:11 AM
3	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Firstly, what privileges? Complaining that women have an option to terminate a pregnancy is like complaining a cancer patient has an option to undergo chemotherapy. It's a medical condition with treatment options. Why wouldn't they be able to take those treatment options? That's what I'm pointing out. Secondly, even if this story didn't actually happen to you (I'll be honest, it's quite the perfect ragebait example so I'm suspicious), similar stories have happened, still happen, and will likely …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/06/25 06:56 AM
-2	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege A man, if he gives birth, can equally give the baby up for safe haven or adoption, no hard feelings, no bill to pay for child support. I'm not sure why you think this option is for women only? It's for anyone who gives birth (yes, I am being mostly facetious here, but that is actually the case). However, if the child is born, it needs to be taken care of. That's expensive. If the state were to pay half the costs of upbringing for every child one parent didn't want to pay for, it'd have to cut a …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 09:54 PM
4	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Yeah, agree to disagree. I don't see this at all as a critique of bad faith arguments people make about male privilege. It just reads like bad faith arguments about female privilege.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 04:41 PM
3	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege If that was the goal, OP needs to do a lot of work on their communication skills, because their writing doesn't look anything like what you're talking about. In fact, it looks exactly like the villification you yourself say we don't need?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 04:17 PM
-8	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Yeah, and women are the ones that are pregnant, so it makes sense that there are options in reference to them being the ones that are pregnant. What is this weird obsession about catering to outcomes men do not experience? Yes, the fact that women get to put a baby up for adoption even if the father is willing to take care of it (but doesn't know the legal avenues to take to stop it) is horrible. I said as much. However, that is a separate issue from women being able to terminate a pregnancy.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 03:24 PM
-12	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Are you kidding me? Yes, it's mostly nonsense. Sure, if you try to read this as charitably as you possibly can, you can find some threads of sense. However, my read on this isn't as charitable as possibly can be (perhaps due to the incendiary language, most specifically the use of the word 'privilege' which is inherently negative as it generally denotes that you have something you don't deserve), as the issues raised don't exist in a vacuum, and are mostly in reference to specific social issues,…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 01:57 PM
0	(CMV) There's no reason why male-only mandatory conscription is not sexist It is sexist, yes. It is discrimination based on gender, literally textbook definition of sexism. But I'm not sure it is unequivocally the wrong choice. It is an undeniable fact that a state needs to be able to defend its sovereignty. Not every state can afford to do so using strictly professional soldiers, so conscription is a tool used to fill that gap. It's not a good tool, but when the other option is "just lose", anything better than that will do. Another undeniable fact is that war fucking…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 11:09 AM
22	A list of some things feminists seem to not understand due to having female privilege Come on. A few of these are legitimate, but most of this list is just misunderstood at best and genuine bad faith arguments at worst. I understand the desire to highlight the gaps in the ideas of how men have everything so easy and how women have everything so hard, but this isn't it. The points you raise are extremely one-sided views ignoring the reality of the other side. This thinking is the same kind of stuff you're trying to criticise here, just from the perspective of men. To solve the iss…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 10:19 AM
1	How do you feel about this report from Australia regarding perpetrators of sexual violence? These are good questions to ask. Concluding that it's all a hate-motivated lie just because these questions can be asked is, however, not good. There are bad people out there doing bad things, sexual assault included. Just because the report does not include all cases doesn't inherently mean the data falsified.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/04/25 02:27 PM
7	How do you feel about this report from Australia regarding perpetrators of sexual violence? If you've got tangible reasons to conclude why you think this, you should express them and cite your sources. Yelling "fake news, they just hate us" is not conducive to insightful, productive discourse. Frankly, this reads like a bot word salad cramming in everything people who don't like us would like to believe we think, so I sure hope you're not one.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/04/25 08:55 AM
1	Your thoughts on this Agree to disagree, it seems.	/r/EverydayMisandry	11/12/24 08:31 AM
1	Your thoughts on this I see two separate issues here that need not be confounded into one. The first one is whther the money going to this organisation going to be used effectively anad for the purpose they say it will. I don't know if it will, I haven't done the research. But that's just a good question to ask of any charity organisation before giving them your money, not specially relevant to the organisation in question. The second one is regarding their messaging. The reality is that suffering men need help. The …	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/12/24 12:58 PM
5	Your thoughts on this Acknowledging the other side's point of view is a good idea. You won't ever change anyone's mind if all you do is preach to the choir. So, say what you need to say to make it happen. Any money that ends up being spent on vulnerable men is a win, and any efforts towards that outcome are very much appreciated.	/r/EverydayMisandry	08/12/24 09:03 AM
1	why is it that men have no control over their own child ? Appreciate the reminder. Edited out the nasty.	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/10/24 01:28 PM
0	why is it that men have no control over their own child ? I am using the framing that the vast majority of hardship of pregnancy lies squarely on the person with the uterus. To me it then also follows logically that the vast majority of decision-making power should also belong to that person. It's not equal, because it isn't equal. However, sure, let's dissect this. First, if you want to trot on your high horse acting intellectually superior, at least be intellectually honest. You are folding pregnancy, a thing that a man, legally speaking, has zero re…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/10/24 12:47 PM
-2	why is it that men have no control over their own child ? My dude, do those men in Japan and South Korea who don't sign off on an abortion magically transplant the pregnancy into themselves and carry it to term? No? Didn't think so. So it's not equality you're talking about, it's quite literally oppression - "No, you don't get to have an abortion since you made the mistke of having sex with me and I want to use you as a vehicle for getting a child, so shut up and just endure this long and traumatic experience that might actually kill you." Nutting insi…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/10/24 08:01 AM
-5	Reminder about generalizing language Sliding in with an edit and then pretending like it was there the whole time? Hell yeah, my man. Anyway. I've said what I had to say, and it remains true - it's okay to share an opinion, but you've got to be ready to defend it. However, I understand that it's not an opinion you reached through rational deliberation of evidence, so I can't actually reason you out of it. You know to yourself what is truth, and any unfortunate details that get in the way can safely be ignored as inconsequential tec…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 08:11 AM
-2	Reminder about generalizing language "If you don't see that God exists, that's your problem, sinner." If you're going to criticise something for dogmatic thought, well... rocks and glass houses, friend. It's clear from the way that you write that you're hurt and want your voice to be heard. That's okay, I understand that. But the best way to be heard here is to put your thoughts into a rational argument, supported by examples and evidence.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 07:40 AM
-2	Reminder about generalizing language An original sin, a specific path to redemption, and an evil entity? Is that really what you think makes a religion? Come on, man. The least you could do under a post from the mods reminding everyone to be intellectually honest is be intellectually honest.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 07:14 AM
1	Biden Proposed the Opposite of Equality for Men's Health Support Wouldn't use breast cancer as an example in the comparison - while women are more at risk, anyone can get breast cancrt. Compare prostate cancer research funding to something like uterine cancer research funding, instead.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/03/24 08:46 AM
3	Welp boys… It finally happened I already answered that question (https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/JmknzFpFrJ) granted, comparing against physical labour, but the point is more or less the same when read in addition to why being able to fight a war is important. The context matters because the whole conversation of what's good, what's bad, and what's equal isn't some big pissing context. The point isn't to participate in some kind of suffering olympics. Issues exist largely independent of one another, and need …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 11:13 AM
2	Welp boys… It finally happened I'll put forward that I disagree with equating the experience of fighting in a war with forced sexual violation. However, while I don't particularly like or agree with conscription, changing the status quo requires attacking why the status quo is important. So, why is conscription important? Because war is real. Sovereign governments are sovereign because they can protect their sovereignty. Part of it is geopolitics, and that can be a good defense, but a big part of it is also simply having the …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 10:35 AM
2	Welp boys… It finally happened You know that some people come back from war healthy, process their traumas, readjust back to civilian life, and go on to be quite fine? I don't like or agree with the whole process either, but talking in hyperbole isn't going to help turn anyone to our cause.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 09:54 AM
2	Welp boys… It finally happened If that's your true, genuine opinion, then we will never agree. I'd much rather have a chance of safety than no chance of safety.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 09:44 AM
0	Welp boys… It finally happened Wait what, coal mining is worse than sex work? I don't think we'll agree on this point. Nor will I agree that being a soldier is the same as being forced into sex work. Being sexually violated in wartime conditions by enemy forces is not necessarily part of the job, but an unfortunate side effect. Does it happen? Yes. Should it happen? No. But what exactly can be done about that? People are absolutely awful when they want to be, and in a battlefield they're already trying to kill each other - th…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 09:39 AM
1	Welp boys… It finally happened Sex is the difference. Physical labour is something everyone does for someone all the time, from, e.g., being forced to do chores when young to, e.g. helping care for grandchildren when you're old. You do stuff for other people, sometimes more, sometimes less, in one way or another, most of your life. It's not always nice, it's not always comfortable, it's not always dignified or something you can take pride in, but most people are well-accustomed to exchanging labour for goods and services - hu…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 09:09 AM
2	Welp boys… It finally happened To be honest, you deserve it. It's difficult for me to see what you said and think that you're arguing in good faith, even though I know you are. The full context is missing, but from the snippet you provide it seems that you equate hard labour in difficult/dangerous conditions to being coerced (or straight up trafficked?) into sex work, which is a an... unusual position. Hard and dangerous jobs are hard and dangerous, but being violated sexually is on an entirely different shelf. Could they be …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/02/24 08:08 AM
9	Men Treating Women With Respect #eQuAlItY Probably the same things you would hit another man for.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/19 03:35 PM
1	Hmmmm One of those. Alright. I asked him to explain the logic behind his reasoning (why he agrees with medical professionals on one treatment, but not another, repeating this in simple language for you, just in case you didn't understand it as you read it, I may have worded it a bit too difficultly for dumbasses to read) and he clearly couldn't. He can brand me a "retard", "leftist", or "gender studies grad" as much as he wants, but if he can't explain the reasoning behind his views, then he's just a …	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/11/18 08:34 AM
0	Hmmmm If you read this thread some more, I did tell him where he's wrong, and he immediately folded, exactly proving my point. Sooooo, chill, bud. Not the hill to die on.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 09:01 PM
0	Hmmmm Oh boy, furious. It's fine, I don't care. But this isn't creating good dialogue. Though I'm sure it's not dialogue you're looking for when you're downvote-diving, so sure, release your vitriol at me, it's okay. :)	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 05:58 PM
0	Hmmmm It's alright, act tough. If there's a place where anyone can act tough, it's the internet. I will repeat what I said at the start - it's okay not to know what you're talking about, it's not okay to pretend you know what you're talking about when you don't. If there's anything you take away from this exchange, let it be this. Because sometimes someone comes along and destroys your whole shitty and uneducated argument with no effort whatsoever. But then again, you wouldn't be stupid if you knew yo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 02:10 AM
0	Hmmmm Oh no, what happened, ran out of snark? There's no shame in being uneducated, read up on it and strive to be better. Or not, I really don't care. Just maybe don't pick a fight with someone who knows what they're talking about next time, save yourself some embarrassment and discomfort of cognitive dissonance. :)	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 01:42 AM
1	Hmmmm Oh god, you're dumb. I'm really bored of repeating that, but I just feel a duty to remind you. And your insults are still shit, you're not even close to being smart enough to pretend you're smart. You can claim whatever bullshit you want, we both know the truth. Anyway, onto telling you where you're wrong. Okay, you agree that depression is a mental illness. And you also agree with the treatments that actual medical professionals have reached through research. So yes, gender dysphoria is a menta…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 01:08 AM
3	Hmmmm It's alright, he's dumb and sitting in an echochamber of others like him. You can't really reason with that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 12:23 AM
1	Hmmmm Okay, hun. Firstly, you assuming I did gender studies for a degree, that my political stance is left-leaning, that I'm part of any movement, or, hell, that I'm at all american are not good arguments, and not even good insults, really. And none of it is at all true. So, cease. You're not making yourself look smarter with shitty ad hominem. And to actually address your "point" now. Answer me this - do you believe that people with depression should just 'get over it'? Fuck medicine, fuck cognitive …	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/11/18 12:07 AM
0	Hmmmm I know, it's not easy to argue with reason. It's fine, you don't have to. Maybe join the antivaxx movement, they deal in exactly the same amount of academic resource as you do here.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 10:13 PM
0	Hmmmm It's alright, you wouldn't be supid if you understood you're stupid. Stay mouthbreathin', love.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 09:55 PM
1	Hmmmm The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 05:43 PM
0	Hmmmm Not even close. Try again.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 05:21 PM
-1	Hmmmm Take a look at the DSM.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 04:43 PM
0	Hmmmm You're unaware that you need to cite an actual resource to back up your bullshit claims (which you won't be able to, since, you know, bullshit). Peak argumentation right there, mate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 04:06 PM
-26	Hmmmm I never said I'm morally right for calling him stupid. That's just making myself feel better. However, to address your point, this subreddit is an echochamber for hate, and you can't educate that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 01:02 PM
-9	Hmmmm Points made. Sure. I don't see any citations for anything you said, therefore I'm at least just as right as you are by merely saying "you're wrong".	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 12:57 PM
-27	Hmmmm They're clearly above education. But I'm not above calling stupid people stupid.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 12:55 PM
-35	Hmmmm It's alright not to know anything about what you're talking about, it's not alright to pretend you know what you're talking about when you don't. Please stop.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/11/18 12:07 PM
1	This is absolutely unacceptable. No, I don't. But don't try to equate me saying that falsely accused people's freedom is worth more than punishing the false accuser to your "rather dead than imprisoned for a crime I didn't commit". These statements are far from equal.	/r/MensRights	11/05/18 08:11 AM
1	This is absolutely unacceptable. Would you like to point me to a source for the claim that confessing to commiting a false accusation brings no punishment upon the person? I don't think you can. Confessing is not punished, of course, however, the false accusation is a crime.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 10:48 PM
1	This is absolutely unacceptable. That's your decision to make. But you don't get to decide how much others value the fact that they are alive.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 10:44 PM
0	This is absolutely unacceptable. Source on that claim? That confessions of false accusations happen only when it's already beyond reasonable doubt that it was a false confession and the falsely imprisoned person is already on their way out of prison? Because otherwise, that confession is necessary for the falsely imprisoned to be free. Thus, advocating for harsh punishments for false accusations is saying that punishing false accusers is more important than the freedom of the falsely accused, and I can't ever agree with that.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 04:50 PM
3	This is absolutely unacceptable. Both these things are required by law. The awful part is that neither are carried out too well.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 01:40 PM
1	This is absolutely unacceptable. Firstly, let's not equate murder to any other crime that does not literally end a person's life. Secondly, false accusations are already illegal. You're asking for stricter punishment for false accusations. Two reasons why that shouldn't happen. 1. It prevents actual rape victims from coming forward, as they're afraid they don't have enough evidence to convict someone. Going through a rape trial as a victim is already awful. 2. It prevents change of mind down the line, like in this case. If the …	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 11:58 AM
3	This is absolutely unacceptable. Lots of things are illegal, yet people still do them. Laws would just make them try harder. Read or watch Gone Girl. I'm 100% against false accusations and what it does to people's lives, but harsh punishment is not the way to go about this.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 11:13 AM
7	This is absolutely unacceptable. Considering that she had to admit it was false for them to be released, having a punishment for admitting a false accusation is a surefire way to make sure they are never that never happens. These guys would still be imprisoned.	/r/MensRights	10/05/18 10:32 AM
9	Student who claimed she was raped on a Michigan college campus is charged with falsely reporting a felony after admitting she fabricated parking lot assault Buddy, no. That's not the right attitude.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/08/17 11:16 AM