Unless that fight is sanctioned and has rules, but actually, no, it doesn't. In fact, in the USA people are getting killed by fists, feet and kicks more than from rifles and shotguns combined (handguns kill much more, though, but that's a different topic). Remember, street fights has no rules and self-defense is also a right. Especially when your attacker is a martial artist, so "but he's unarmed, using a gun against an unarmed attacker is wrong!" isn't an argument.
Tate is also overcompensating his ego by saying that he's a former kickboxing champion. Yes, he is. Except that vast majority of his fights was in a local British promotion and his skills, while decent, wasn't actually on an elite or even close to a top tier level. His fighting record is okay, but nothing really special. People have already analyzed his kickboxing skills and concluded that Tate, despite being good, isn't really an elite fighter.
It's kinda fun to hear about the strength and fighting ability from redpill redditors or incels (they're basically the same), because I'm sure that 99% of them has never fought in their life and has no skills in martial arts. But they still love to say that shit about "you're yapping, go touch some grass and go into the gym" or "I would beat the shit out of you in a fight".
Form their point of view, fighting over something petty is a "thing that makes you a real man". Funny to heard that from incels or redditors that are very likely has never trained in martial arts or was in a real fight (outside of some bullying or few scraps with schoolmates).
That's why he doesn't walking alone in the USA, I guess. I mean, a 100 lbs woman can easily kill him with a small concealed carry gun regardless of how skilled he is.
It's like the same argument about "rape is one of the most popular sexual fantasy among women" that's used by sexists to either "prove" that "rape isn't that bad" or something similar. Awful argument. Also, "bad boys" isn't one-dimensional most of the time, they can be misunderstood, or act like that as a defense, but genuinely love their parents or girlfriends, not act like an asshat all the time.
It's like the same argument about "rape is one of the most popular sexual fantasy among women" that's used by sexists to either "prove" that "rape isn't that bad" or something similar. Awful argument.
I remember how once an undefeated female kickboxer challenged a man, who was mostly a "tomato can" because of his poor fighting record and high percentage of losses. Result? Man wrecked the female fighter, while going relatively easy on her, and that's why she wasn't instantly KO'd. Some people try to make that loss as a feat like "Well, she actually took hits from a trained man and fought toe-to-toe against him, it's a great showing for a female fighter". Except she wasn't and it's not a good s…
Yeah, women are biologically less strong than men, even a trained one (not counting an obviously biased examples like female powerlifter vs scrawny average Joe).
