TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Alex_Mercer_23 Archive

View 5 posts and 382 comments by Alex_Mercer_23 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Kinda? What you're getting at is the fact that racism is linked to power dynamics. A white person in a predominantly white country saying "He's black, he runs very fast" is not the same as a white person saying "You're white, you probably run slowly" Nope, they are exactly the same thing just from two different frames of references. Saying A is longer than B doesn't differ from saying B is shorter than A. Changing the frame of reference doesn't change the physical outcome. In your example it is …
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 09:17 PM
6

This is called the benevolent sexism conjecture which is basically unfalsiable bullshit. However it can be made unreasonable by providing an analogue. Historically the reasoning that blacks could tolerate pain better was used to justify slavery on blacks but not on whites. Does this mean they were racist against whites and thought that whites were inferior which led to slavery of blacks? Clearly this sounds ridiculous.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 08:16 PM
15

Historically the reasoning that blacks could tolerate more heat and pain was used to justify slavery for blacks but not for whites. Does this mean historically, people were racist against whites as the reasoning basically says that whites are inferior in terms of tolerance and strength?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 08:08 PM
1

I see that the creator is focusing a lot on online misogyny and generalising it to all men, well interestingly majority of the online misogyny is spread by women not men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/25 09:02 PM
3

r/LeftistsForMen
/r/MensRights24/01/25 06:47 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/3UwTIJhRRq Also https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Kaatz-R01-text-analysis-15.pdf Career advancement in academic medicine often hinges on the ability to garner research funds. The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) R01 award is the “gold standard” of an independent research program. Studies show inconsistencies in R01 reviewers’ scoring and in award outcomes for certain applicant groups. Consistent with the NIH recommendation to examine p…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 10:03 AM
5

Don't become what you swear to destroy.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 04:38 PM
2

Don't become what you swear to destroy.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 04:37 PM
7

Let me refute both of the arguments: 1: No systemic discrimination https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02678373.2022.2129514 Based on a social identity perspective, we tested hypotheses about the risks of bullying and differences in the increase in mental health problems in a probability sample of the Swedish workforce in a prospective design. The results showed an increased risk of bullying and an increase in mental health problems as an outcome for men when in a gender minority, howev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/25 11:36 AM
5

Ok so on your pdf, it says. Parliament added s. 233 to the Criminal Code in 1948. Traditionally, many mothers who killed their newly born children were poor and unable to raise them.11 They were often raped or seduced by their employers or their employer’s relatives and fired once their pregnancy became known. It says that it was considered whether they able to raise their children or not for the jurisdiction, if they are taking that into consideration for not convicting the mother for murder th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 09:07 PM
9

Ok then explain the existence of unilateral adoption, safe havens and infanticide being punishable to a far lesser extent than Manslaughter or murder in countries like Canada and New Zealand
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 08:00 PM
9

I mean Hillary Clinton was also listed in one of the documents of Epstein but still she got to run for the president, almost won and was also the secretary of the state. https://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clintons-name-emerges-new-batch-jeffrey-epstein-documents-1858314 No state has banned abortion completely, most states that restrict it still allow it for reasons such as health, rape, incest and fetal abnormality which ironically are the commonly argued reasons for abortions in general debates. …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:51 PM
1

The trans is a minority, and is still a complex topic on its position in the us Irrelevant but you know what makes 50% of the population? Women. So the obv the left, who doesnt particularly discriminate against women Who do you think makes the other half? Men, obamacare provides free tubal litigation to women covered by insurance but doesn't allow vasectomy to be covered by insurance for men. and wayyyyy better than the right, which has problems with every single person excluding straight white …
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:29 AM
5

Lol like left wingers aren't biased? Excluding trans women from women's sports is transphobia but at the same time they have to register for draft?
/r/MensRights07/10/24 09:50 AM
1

I recently found this survey from 2016 (a little old) and according to it 79% men and 75% believe that men and women are equal. Doesn't this conflict idea that young men/boys are becoming conservative? Or do they mean anything else by conservatism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 09:30 PM
2

Men never built the world alone, both men and women built it but in different ways. Also no ones hates the world but that doesn't mean it does not have any flaws. All we point out are the flaws of the modern world. Honestly saying that women did nothing for the world would be very misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 06:02 PM
2

Talking about online or trivial misogyny you are dead wrong. https://www.brandwatch.com/press/press-releases/ditch-label-announce-findings-report-cyberbullying-hate-speech-online/ This study analyzed 19 million tweets and found the exact opposite of what you are saying. Misogynist tweets were the second most common form of hate speech with 3m of analysed tweets featuring misogynistic comments. 52% of these were sent by women. Tweets about what it means to be a man, homophobia and transphobia als…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:15 AM
5

I wanted to object to the feminist definition of patriarchy, a system where men oppress women. On the rule of father thing, men also have way higher responsibilities in these countries over their families so that might be one of the reasons for their higher rule. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahr In these middle east countries there exists a thing called 'Mahr' which is a form of wealth given from groom's family to bride's family in marriage. Keep in mind that this is the right of a bride as …
/r/MensRights17/09/24 02:44 PM
8

Not really, western media exaggerates many issues faced by women and downplays many faced by men. I wouldn't call it patriarchal. Sure women do have it bad but so do men which many people forget to think about.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 02:15 PM
7

This is ridiculous to say the least. Women do benefit from their unpaid labour indirectly so even though it may look unpaid from one perspective it isn't actually one. Btw Messi fan?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 03:32 PM
7

Redpiller confirmed.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:12 PM
11

Women must give birth due to biology as they have uterus. (I don't actually believe this, its just something we should follow if we go by traditional gender roles).
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:10 PM
16

Yeah and obviously feminists don't complain about movie scenes showing even the slightest violence against women /s.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 10:08 AM
84

Most female infants are killed by their mothers yet when talking about female infanticide no one says "By other women".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 02:38 PM
1

No misogyny pls.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:20 PM
1

And (most) real life feminists dont work against men's rights only against male priviliges and rightly so. All of them in a generalised way may not hate men but they do seem to have a bias against us. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29781373/ Indeed, we found that subliminal exposure to stereotypes (vs. counter-stereotypes) led women who identify relatively strongly with feminists, but less strongly with women, to (a) persist in a math task, (b) show increased willingness to sacrifice men in a M…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:23 PM
3

I mean watching porn doesn't neccessarily equate to porn addiction does it?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:19 PM
2

Women watch more violent porn than men. https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn/ While men still search for significantly more porn than women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men. https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html After interviewing over 300 regular pornography viewers in a study published in Archives of Sexual Behaviour, Professor Eran Shor found that …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 05:43 PM
4

How exactly is porn bad?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 05:13 PM
10

We do not hate women. Feminists actively protests against men's rights that's why we hate them. Conversely don't act like feminists don't hate MRAs.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 05:06 PM
68

Why should that define the entirety of feminism in your mind? In your orignal comment No. Most feminists attack the MRM because you are ACTIVELY HOSTILE towards feminism as a whole. So we are allowed to generalise MRAs but not feminists? Nice hypocrisy. 90 organisations and 130 shelters are not a joke.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:18 PM
69

Neither, they were pro male. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/1WNUft3fpQ
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:48 PM
94

Most MRAs are hostilecagainst feminists because feminists always try to suppress men's right events even when they are not hosted by MRAs.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:37 PM
2

Again you ignore what women say to other women by cherrypicking what men say. Women actually perpetrate half if not a majority of the online misogyny. This first study here was conducted by demos in 2014, which concluded women make atleast half of all the misogynistic comments on social media. https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/MISOGYNY_ON_TWITTER.pdf Women are as almost as likely as men to use the terms ‘slut’ and ‘whore’ on Twitter. Not only are women using these words, they are dire…
/r/MensRights26/08/24 04:56 PM
–

He isn't wrong with his initial conjecture though. India is a very bad place for men (and tbh all people in general). khabardar jo ladkiyo k bare mein kuch kaha Classic whiteknighting
/r/MensRights26/08/24 04:50 PM
31

This is actually a pretty hypocritical thing as far as I have seen, people have no problem with men being comvicted for drug dealing but when a woman is convicted for prostitution people say "She didn't have an option" despite the fact that many men too are forced to sell drugs for the sake of economic survival Nice username btw.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 01:26 PM
14

In the same world child soldiers are arrested and prosecuted for any actions they commit despite not having a choice. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilronline/26/ The problem of child soldiers is not going to go away. While it may not be a popular solution, child soldiers need to be prosecuted for the actions they commit during conflicts in addition to the prosecution of child soldier recruiters. Without legal ramifications, there is no incentive for the child soldier recruiters to stop their …
/r/MensRights26/08/24 12:50 PM
6

Another interesting thing is that these same people are outrageously against police brutality when it happens to blacks but when it happens to men (98% people killed by police are men) they say "MeN cOmMiT mOrE cRiMeS".
/r/MensRights25/08/24 09:13 PM
4

r/Menkampf
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:12 PM
3

Would you say the same to feminists trying to get porn banned.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 11:43 AM
25

First ask them "So women have 0 contribution to the modern society and did absolutely nothing for the civilisation" (Obviously the answer is no). Parallel to this question saying that women have no role in setting the modern society is not only idiotic but also disrespectful to women. For example most workplace deaths are men combined with the fact that women own 40% businesses in the US. Historically too 40% of slave owners were white women while 67% slaves were men. Another thing is war in whi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 01:09 PM
-13

A syndrome that is not even proven yet lol
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:55 PM
1

link
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:30 PM
3

Oh, there was another comment about first fixing the death gap… I don't think saying "We need to fix workplace deaths gap" equates to "feminists are responsible for workplace deaths gap". If forced labor is happening, we need to do what we can to stop that. Absolutely.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:43 PM
3

I think it’s silly to blame feminists for the fact that men choose to do dangerous jobs like this in the modern world. They seem more likely to risk their lives for a paycheck where women will not. No one is doing that, we accept that men choose to do these jobs. Economic circumstances in countries where people do not have such freedom of choice in their career is a whole different animal, and seems to be a human rights issue. Well forced labour still exists in most countries including USA
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:34 PM
8

Sure they don't but that doesn't mean conditions shall not be made safer and better for the people working there. This is like saying we should stop doing research on child birth and pregnancy since women get pregnant voluntarily. Plus many underage boys and poor men (also women and girls) who forced to do such tasks because of bad economic conditions.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:19 PM
7

As a physics and maths student we are nowhere near to replacing jobs done by human labourers using robots. Robots usually do an equal or higher amount of work than humans when the task involves repetition (By work-energy theorem, total work done is defined as the change in kinetic energy i.e W=ΔKE). In tasks like oil rig working and construction they actually tend to be less efficient and less accurate than humans.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:12 PM
11

Well the person in the post I linked said that he froze alot of his sperm which means that they can still have a child.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:50 PM
92

For a reference here's a post in which a guy got a vasectomy without telling his wife. https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/s/9Ueg9IA1bo As expected everything is opposite here.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:11 AM
5

So what would you like to say about this https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/s/9Ueg9IA1bo This guy got a vasectomy without telling his wife and people are calling him the AH. Also if a fetus doesn't have humans rights then why is it double homicide to kill a pregnant woman?
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:09 AM
6

As an Indian I can confirm.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:05 PM
20

Not sure why this is getting downvoted.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 11:32 AM
8

They do, but most of them are just tradcons tradcucks, unfortunately FTFY
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:18 AM
11

Are there even proper MRAs in India, most Indian MRAs I have seen only talk about legal disadvantages and false accusations. They totally ignore domestic violence and rape against men.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:04 AM
12

How about this https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2034049 On page 5 table 1 Physical Violence Verbal and emotional violence Economic violence Sexual Abuse No Violence 25.21 22.18 32.79 17.82 2% Another study https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/study-child-abuse-india-2007/ page 94 Of all the children reporting sexual assault, 54.4% were boys and 45.6% were girls
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:51 AM
15

https://ccsinternship.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/286_case-for-gender-neutral-rape-laws-in-india_jaai-vipra.pdf On pg 12 table 3.2 Age Bracket Men who reported having been coerced or forced into sex as an adult by a woman 18 to 24 6% 25 to 34 22.1% 35 to 44 42.1% 45 above 20% Overall 16.1% It further says that that on the 35 to 44 age group most men reported being raped by their wives. Another study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2034049 On page 5 table 1 Physical Violence V…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:37 AM
4

Yeah I know this subreddit critiques feminism alot along with MRA discussions but certain issues can only be solved once the feminist claims relating to them are addressed (For example we have to debunk the duluth model while talking about domestic violence). You can visit r/Leftwingmaleadvocates this subreddit mostly talks about men rights and issues. We are far from becoming what feminists are, we don't deny women's issues or prejudices that women face, we accept that both men and women face d…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 07:32 PM
14

Because 1: Feminists are the biggest hurdle in the way of MRM. 2: r/AntiFeminism was banned so now we have to discuss antifeminist ideas here.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 07:17 PM
8

Username + Post History checks out.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:58 PM
9

How tf did the moderators approve this.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:51 PM
1

u/MensRightsModteam
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:50 PM
3

I like how r/antifeminism got banned yet subs like femalepessimists and FDS still exist.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:17 PM
2

Nope.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/24 08:14 AM
2

Thanks :-D
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/24 11:34 AM
3

Okay so what happened here is that this cosplayer unfortunately got death and rape threats over her medic cosplay. Now the user I replied to had commented the bear emoji (🐻) as you can see. Clearly she was referring to the man vs bear trend saying that she would choose bear instead of men who gave her rape threats. I replied to here with a barrage of stats and studies showing that half of the online threats, aggressive tweets and online misogyny are perpetrated by women themselves and exclusivel…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/24 11:29 AM
17

that is no justifications for crimes. Yet women in UK who are forced to sell drugs are legally exempted from facing criminal charges for it https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Sn0cDDYAeo
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:57 AM
3

I hope you understood now what's happening.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/24 07:29 AM
3

You know about the man vs bear trend ?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/24 07:27 AM
1

Okay so I read you comments and I agree with it. Yes both men and women have issues and are equally oppressed today in the world but many feminists simply refuse to believe that men are victims of crime as often as women are if not. We as MRAs are completely willing to side with feminists if they support men's issues and understand but that's the problem, they don't see brigaders from r/Feminism on this sub claiming that men don't have issues or men don't deserve a movement. I completely support…
/r/MensRights09/08/24 05:22 AM
12

Seems so. The only left place now is r/PrototypeGame
/r/EverydayMisandry08/08/24 04:50 PM
3

Not sure if this qualifies as being friendly but studies prove that men are more likely than women to help someone stuck in a problem. we've begun to almost completely gender neutralize it is how most bystanders who go out of their way to risk their lives for somebody else or expose themselves to danger to protect somebody else are also men https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786599 One hundred forty-five experimenters "accidentally" dropped a handful of pencils or coins on 1,497 occasions before a to…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:28 PM
17

For anyone who wants sources debunking these myths: Myth 1: Women die more in DV https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/7UaHgiGBHZ Myth 2: Women attempt suicide more https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/TECzEnPvKT Also check out this post this post from TheTinMenBlog debunking the second myth. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/Xf9m2x7jy5
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:47 PM
30

My question for every feminist here. When talking about domestic violence- Women die more so women should get more shelters even though the perpetration rates are similar, this is not actually the case though (focusing on the output ignoring the input) When talking about suicide- Women attempt suicide more they should get more attention, again this is not the case actually (focusing on input ignoring the output). They literally flip the logic everytime the way it suits them. On the first case th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:41 PM
1

Women do not get ideation at the same rate. Serious suicide attempt is not measured by the choice of violent methods but rather with the intent of dying and the feeling of nihilism. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 "Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than fema…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:35 PM
1

Women experience suicide ideation and deaths at the same rate as men. Are you seious, I just proved that's not the case. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 "Suicide intent data from 5212 participants was included in the analysis. A significant association between suicide intent and gender was found, where ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). There was a statistically significant gender …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:32 PM
1

Idk why your comments are getting deleted but I'll reply them here. So most women who attempt suicide self report them while men do not. If you take biomedical data for suicide attempts then it appears men also attempt suicide more but report less. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 Also when looking at studies men perform suicide with a more serious intent and due to the same reason are less likely to report it considering it a inability at their part unl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:29 PM
3

Wrong This is another flaw. Most suicide attempts are based on self reporting stats and most men who attempt suicide never report it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22831756/ Furthermore studies have shown that even when using the same methods as women men are more likely to die. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953610005629 Men commit serious suicide attempts more https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 Also studies indicate that men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:16 PM
2

Nope. When suicides relating to domestic violence are considered men are more likely to die in a domestic violence situation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379723001356 From 2003 to 2020, there were 402,391 suicide deaths of adults (aged ≥18 years) from the 48 participating states in NVDRS; of them, 20% were IPP-related suicides. Among the IPP-related suicides, persons aged 25–44 years comprised almost half (49.0%) of decedents, and a majority were White (80.2%), wer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:13 PM
5

Also since you want to talk about that multiple studies have proven discrimination against fathers at family courts E.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20200629044650/https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/lawreview/articles/volume153/issue3/Maldonado153U.Pa.L.Rev.921(2005).pdf See id. (noting that fathers who seek custody prevail in half or more cases); Mason & Quirk, supra note 228, at 228 tbl.2 (citing statistics showing that fathers won custody in forty-two percent of custody appeals, mothers preva…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:02 PM
3

How does that have anything to do with what I wrote?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:55 PM
28

this is literally a proven double standard https://www.americansurveycenter.org/a-moral-double-standard-on-marital-infidelity/ Seventy percent of women say that a married man who has an affair is always morally wrong, while fewer (56 percent) say the same when married women have relationships outside their marriage. Gender plays a more modest role among men in how they judge the morality of marital infidelity. Fifty-three percent of men say it is always morally wrong for a woman to have an affai…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 08:26 AM
2

There is no such thing as pseudofeminist.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 07:30 PM
7

The average man does 4.17hr of paid work per day while the average woman does 2.98 (thus the men do 1.19 more) The average woman does 2.32hr of household activities, while the average man does 1.49 (thus the women do 1.17 more) 2.32-1.49 is 0.83 not 1.17. Also in aggregate this means that: Men work 4.17+1.49=5.66 hours everyday while women women work 2.98+2.32=5.30 hours everyday. So men clearly work longer here.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/08/24 07:27 PM
4

This is not only a problem with feminism but rather with our society as a whole, whenever a woman commits a crime people automatically try to find reasons as for how she was possibly forced to commit the crimes or did not have any other choice while when a man commits a crime people automatically think that he is inherently evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 07:36 AM
2

I am only trying to prove that its unreasonable to say that all queens who started wars were used as puppets by male ministers. Not saying female rulers are inherently more likely to go to wars.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 06:19 PM
2

http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Queens_Oct2015.pdf On p.25-26 of the study I linked above: Columns (1) and (2) of Table 9 show that among married monarchs, queens were more likely to participate as attackers and less likely to be attacked than kings. Yet among unmarried monarchs, queens were more likely to be attacked than kings. These results provide two additional insights into the mechanism at play. First, the differential tendency of queens to participate as attackers among marri…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 06:02 PM
5

http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Queens_Oct2015.pdf On p.29 of the study. Another account suggests that aggressive actions undertaken during a queen's reign may reflect the actions a foreign minister, rather than the queen herself. This conjecture is based on two assumptions first, that foreign ministers are more aggressive than monarchs, and second, that women rulers are more easily influenced by ministers than male rulers. Although this assumption has been questioned, if female rule…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 05:31 PM
6

http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Queens_Oct2015.pdf On p.25-26 of the study I linked above: Columns (1) and (2) of Table 9 show that among married monarchs, queens were more likely to participate as attackers and less likely to be attacked than kings. Yet among unmarried monarchs, queens were more likely to be attacked than kings. These results provide two additional insights into the mechanism at play. First, the differential tendency of queens to participate as attackers among marri…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 05:28 PM
61

It really bothers me that even after all this, all these Body Positivity activitists talk about are fat people (specifically women) while ignoring the height part (which unsurprisingly affects men the most).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 04:52 PM
15

Yeah I know dude the media always tries to ignore male victims and female perpetrators of violence. Here's a relevent study I found about IPV/DV in Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332917590_Prevalence_and_Consequences_of_Intimate_Partner_Violence_in_Canada_as_Measured_by_the_National_Victimization_Survey This study found that 2.9% of men and 1.7% of women reported experiencing physical and/or sexual IPV (intimate partner violence) in their current relationships in the last 5 yea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 12:34 PM
18

Your threads are very informative. Saved all of them. Thanks, I am a maths and physics student and also an MRA so I usually try to use studies to support my claims in my comments. In part 2 of your threads, when that person made the statement "women mostly kill in self defence", what if they were referring to crime in general? Not just IPV/Domestic abuse? Because you only listed information for IPV specifically. What about for criminal cases other than IPV? Well the reason I mentioned DV and IPV…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 12:17 PM
30

Another thing I would like to add here is the OP of the referenced post uses anecdotes for highlighting the conjecture that many female criminals are themselves victims of crimes completely ignoring that so are most of the male criminals. Male prisoners: Dr Naomi Murphy from the Fens Offender Personality Disorder Pathway Service at HMP Whitemoor spoke of her work with offenders in her care. She found: • 66.1% reported childhood sexual abuse • 72.6% reported childhood physical abuse • 80.6% repor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 08:02 AM
32

Part- 3 Statement 3: Women are caregivers Rebuttal 3: Ok this is just dumb, will you seriously leave a child with a criminal just because the criminal is his/her mother?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 07:11 AM
32

Part- 2 Statement 2: Women mostly kill in defense Rebuttal 2: This is straight up wrong https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment Straus reports in "Thirty Years of Denying the Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence": "Probably the most frequently argued difference in motives of women perpetrators is the assertion that when women assault a partner it is usually …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 06:57 AM
36

Part- 1 Statement 1: Most female prisoners were victims of sexual violence Rebuttal 1: So were most male rapists. The majority of men who rape women are sexually abused by women in childhood Heterosexual Molestation of Children Who Later Became Rapists This is a report of a serendipitous finding from another study of childhood heterosexual molestation of men who were incarcerated as adults for rape. Subjects were 83 men in a medium security penitentiary who had been convicted of raping women at …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 06:49 AM
2

/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:20 AM
22

/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:47 AM
32

/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:25 AM
-1

No true scotsman Appeal to definition fallacy) Also by your logic was Joseph Stalin not a communist?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:49 PM
17

The worst part is that these people sometimes want it both ways. I remember when I saw someone (here on reddit) saying that men only protect women because they feel entitled to them, thus men protect women because they consider them inferior. Basically, when they don't protect they are unempathetic and when they protect they are entitled.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:51 PM
35

what's funny is that clinical studies prove that men are more likely than women to help someone stuck in a problem. we've begun to almost completely gender neutralize it is how most bystanders who go out of their way to risk their lives for somebody else or expose themselves to danger to protect somebody else are also men https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786599 One hundred forty-five experimenters "accidentally" dropped a handful of pencils or coins on 1,497 occasions before a total of 4,813 bystan…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:30 PM
5

Why isn't any black person helping her? /s
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:20 PM
18

This is another flaw. Most suicide attempts are based on self reporting stats and most men who attempt suicide never report it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22831756/ Furthermore studies have shown that even when using the same methods as women men are more likely to die. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953610005629 Men commit serious suicide attempts more https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 Also studies indicate that men have …
/r/EverydayMisandry01/08/24 07:20 AM
8

This is actually a common mistake. There are two types of mental disorders, Internalising and externalising. The type of mental disorders which usually cause harm to oneself and others are the ones which are externalising, which are more common in men (internalising disorders are more common in women). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953610005629 Furthermore most of the self harm, abuse on others and substance abuse (which also leads to further crimes) are caused by ex…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/08/24 07:14 AM
14

When suicides relating to domestic violence are considered men are more likely to die in a domestic violence situation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379723001356 From 2003 to 2020, there were 402,391 suicide deaths of adults (aged ≥18 years) from the 48 participating states in NVDRS; of them, 20% were IPP-related suicides. Among the IPP-related suicides, persons aged 25–44 years comprised almost half (49.0%) of decedents, and a majority were White (80.2%), were male…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/08/24 07:08 AM
5

When suicides relating to domestic violence are considered men are more likely to die in a domestic violence situation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379723001356 From 2003 to 2020, there were 402,391 suicide deaths of adults (aged ≥18 years) from the 48 participating states in NVDRS; of them, 20% were IPP-related suicides. Among the IPP-related suicides, persons aged 25–44 years comprised almost half (49.0%) of decedents, and a majority were White (80.2%), were male…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:23 AM
30

This just goes on to show how biased the media is. You will see hundreds of articles claiming how men are more likely to leave their wives one which is retracted and the other which has a very low sample size while ignoring every other study.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:04 PM
1

The Guardian is totally misandrist
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:28 PM
5

I got it dude, I am from India so I got confused by the freedom part.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 11:09 AM
3

Oh WW2, actually I was confused by the freedom part since I am from India and our freedom movement was quite different.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 11:08 AM
8

what freedom and which war are you talking about exactly? Please be a little more specific.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 11:01 AM
10

What freedom of speech was afforded to r/MGTOW and r/AntiFeminists
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:49 AM
10

They already are, MGTOW and Incels were banned.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:48 AM
12

Ok then why did r/Incels, r/MGTOW, r/MGTOW2 and r/AntiFeminists get banned.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:47 AM
4

They do although to a much lower level. 2.5% women are stronger than the average man.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:03 AM
6

There may be fewer ladies than gents with the innate talent or socialized desire to study engineering, but ladies who succeed in engineering despite that are no less competent than their male peers. Or at least, it should be that way. DEI-based hiring might ironically end up skewing the talent pool back toward male dominance, as the general quality of female engineers drops due to lower standards and male engineers earn a reputation for competence due to the stricter standards they're forced to …
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:00 AM
3

Because overlapping distributions don't work like that. The average man is taller than the average woman, but that doesn't mean all men are taller than all women. The same is true for engineering aptitude: There may be fewer ladies than gents with the innate talent or socialized desire to study engineering, but ladies who succeed in engineering despite that are no less competent than their male peers. I can make the same point for military conscription thus women should be drafted to war right (…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:46 AM
17

Yup idk why incels are hated so much online and blamed for literally every atrocity on earth when they are not responsible for it. Apart from that they are also shamed for their inability to get sex which they have no control over.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 06:30 AM
36

Studies show exactly the opposite Incels are less violent than average people. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-023-00220-3 Most incels are not misogynistic, aren't conservative or right leaning, don't feel entitled to women and surprisingly about 33% of them are autistic. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/predicting-harm-among-incels-involuntary-celibates Actually misogynistic men have more sex than normal men https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC4842…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 06:18 AM
2

Studies show exactly the opposite Incels are less violent than average people. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-023-00220-3 Most incels are not misogynistic, aren't conservative or right leaning, don't feel entitled to women and surprisingly about 33% of them are autistic. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/predicting-harm-among-incels-involuntary-celibates
/r/MensRights31/07/24 06:10 AM
7

Why not hire all men in engineering and designing then considering men have better mental rotation and mechanical reasoning which are essential for engineering and designing. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/male-female/201910/men-s-advantages-in-spatial-cognition-mechanical-reasoning https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0120-x
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:58 AM
3

When one of my friends had such encounter with multiple women (he has been SAed by multiple women unfortunately) so would it be ok if he generalises all women this way.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:31 AM
8

So by logic posting news about male criminals is "male bad"?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:59 PM
3

You are right, I have changed my opinion. In the case of rape the mother should be allowed to abort and the father should be allowed to opt out of child support.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:55 PM
2

Useless, it would be damaging to both men's and women's rights. Men should be allowed to abort while men should be allowed to withdraw child support.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:31 PM
10

I think there can be one fix to this. Can we make it that whenever men are forced to fight wars then the government can make women of the country birth a certain number of children and make them work in childcare in order to make up for the men dying and getting disabled, injured and captured by the enemies. I know that this would be a very controversial take but do you think this would work? Like this can be said for the people who say "WhO iS GoInG tO GiVe BiRtH" when argument of male only dra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 02:18 PM
1

I am sorry. Hope that helps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:19 PM
1

Okay so I made a mistake there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:19 PM
1

The feminist argument was also BS then ig, as it also talked about online misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:14 PM
1

Again I was trying to argue what they consider misoguny not me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:14 PM
1

I wasn' arguing on existence, I was arguing on proportion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:10 PM
1

Because I was replying to feminists not u.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:06 PM
1

but the way I present facts needs to correlate with their arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:06 PM
1

Online things dont have any significance. I could have mentioned it and supported my narrative but I didnt to save my time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:04 PM
1

I said accoeding to how feminists define misogyny not me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:03 PM
1

Nope you are just making interpretations and pretending that its the reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:01 PM
1

I was literally replying to feminists so idk why i would make that clear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 05:00 PM
1

Bruh you are considering remotely any form of criticism as bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:59 PM
1

lol can you stop putting words in my mouth seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:59 PM
1

Again I mentioned the way feminists think not the way I think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:58 PM
1

If you consider everything bigotry then obviously you will get the answer as yes lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:57 PM
1

If you consider everything bigotry then obviously you will get the answer as yes lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:57 PM
1

I wouldn't have lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:53 PM
1

That might be ok from your POV but personally that's not how I define bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:51 PM
1

Because if that was the argument with your logic it would be no one spreads it. You argument both men and women do not have internalised hate towards women. As I said I agree with internalised disrespect But now your saying it’s criticism, offensiveness and other synonymous words to back pedal Funny how you are talking about the internalised misogyny when you yourself were bigoted about my wife being a misogynist lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:51 PM
1

Because online behaviours and real life behaviours are vastly different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:48 PM
1

The argument wasn’t about who spreads it. It was about women having internalised misogyny and whether or not that true or not I agree with internalised disrespect
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:47 PM
1

It was just about the offenders lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:44 PM
1

I was never talking about real life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:42 PM
1

Because you don’t have to be attracted to women to have them. So why is my wife marrying me? Are you saying women are attracted to misogynists? So what is your excuse for mentioning misogyny now Because the argument isn't about it being real but about who spreads it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:42 PM
1

Because their argument wasn't about its existence, it was about who spreads it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:39 PM
1

If you didn’t agree why did you use it as the main focus of your argument ? Because feminists do. And I know you hate women. You don’t have to be attracted to one to hate them. I don't, why would my wife marry a misogynistic though btw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:38 PM
1

Because I was replying to feminists who think that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:36 PM
1

Because I don't agree with that part. I don't hate women lol considering I am getting married lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:35 PM
1

You are free to doubt but that won't change the reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:33 PM
1

Because the study does talk about what I consider criticism and rudeness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:32 PM
1

I feel sorry for your wife. Or maybe she’s part of the women who are misogynistic oh sorry “rude” to other women 😂😂😂😂 Do not target my wife. She is not misogynistic but rather egalitarian like me. you didn’t say critical. The study you cited did. In which is also said misogynistic. Which you claimed isn’t true. So how does that work ? You pick and choose what words work for you in a study you cite ? I used the words I found to be right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:31 PM
1

Bruh you know right two studies can't directly be conflated with each other. I am literally one of the best academics of by university.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:28 PM
1

Again the study used the term not me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:27 PM
1

Yet you still included it to prove your claim that women are more horrible to other women. And like I’ve mentioned before. When did this become an argument of real life examples. I said critical not horrible. It was always conceptual in nature. Youre so misogynistic you stumble on your arguments 😂that is hilarious Lol funny considering I am engaged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:26 PM
1

Again I never stated women are terrible, I said they are more likely to be critical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:23 PM
1

The online one not the workplace one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:21 PM
1

Because it wasn't relevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:20 PM
1

The stufy never used the bigotry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:19 PM
1

Bias towards them I meant. For isntance people may consider female workers to be better therefore being more critical towards them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:18 PM
1

If you want to encompass everything as bigotry then obviously it is internalised bigotry. You may consider it but I don't define bigotry the way you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:16 PM
1

Basic criticism, nope. Heavy criticism, yes. The studies are based on benevolent criticism not hostile criticism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:14 PM
1

Nope expectations arent aren't necessarily bigotry, they can be due to bias or optimism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:13 PM
1

Again those studies talk about criticism not misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:11 PM
1

More critical than men =/= overly critical Once again higher criticism can be due to higher expectations which is not bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:10 PM
1

More critical than men =/= overly critical Once again higher criticism can be due to higher expectations which is not bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:09 PM
1

Are you seriously saying criticism is misogyny? Lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:05 PM
1

Again the studies also say that these behaviours don't reflect real life behaviours
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:04 PM
1

Because the studies used them and said that online behaviours don't reflect real life behaviours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:01 PM
1

I do as I said, are you happy now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 04:00 PM
1

Which are all components of bigotry. Being disrespectful towards a demographic due to them existing…is bigoted mindsets Where does the study state women who made disrespectful comments were prejudiced?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:59 PM
1

They aren't, they are disrespectful not misogynistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:56 PM
1

I never talked about disrespect, I talked about bigotry. Seems like you can't get enough of me, wanna get married?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:55 PM
1

I said I don't agree with internalised misogyny not with internalised disrespect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:54 PM
1

As I said I agree with internalised disrespectfulness not with misogyny or bigotry though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:53 PM
1

Internalised offensiveness is what I can actually agree upon, glad we finally agreed on something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:51 PM
1

Rude means doing it to a specific person while bigotry means doing it because of prejudice or bad opinions about that group, none of these studies conclude women who commented rudely were prejudiced towards women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:50 PM
1

Again it goes to a greater limit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:47 PM
1

Again that's about criticism, not hate through which I wanted to prove that it is more related to criticism and competitiveness not hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:46 PM
1

I was talking about what feminists (not me) call online misogyny. Again studies conclude the online behavior don't usually match real behaviour.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:45 PM
1

Bruh I want to end because I having an exam in a few hours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:44 PM
1

Bigotry: obstinate or intolerant devotion to one's own opinions and prejudices This is far from rudeness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:43 PM
1

Being rude to someone means having competition or a sort of rivalry (not extreme) with them. Hating means wanting extreme level of bad to happen to the other person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:42 PM
1

Rudeness =/= Bigotry 😉😘
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:40 PM
1

Nope, rude =/= hate pls learn the difference between the two.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:40 PM
1

Again terms in a study used that word, and they also concluded at the end that online attitudes do not reflect real life attitudes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:39 PM
1

Ok then let's just end this anyway if you are going to think what you like and I am going to think what I like at the end of the day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:38 PM
1

Its called queen bee syndrome. https://news.arizona.edu/news/incivility-work-queen-bee-syndrome-getting-worse Across the three studies, we found consistent evidence that women reported higher levels of incivility from other women than their male counterparts," Gabriel said. "In other words, women are ruder to each other than they are to men, or than men are to women. Not misogyny
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:37 PM
1

Nope, I believe its never really hate speech to comment on other tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:35 PM
1

d jealously and negative comments can come from feeling you are in competition with someone else. What what now ? I Nope that's biological.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:33 PM
1

Again feminists call it misogyny, I personally do not believe it being misogyny. I just the term of convenience of others. Its just competitiveness among women which gets classified as misogyny. Its really that simple hon 🤗🤗.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:33 PM
1

No I have given my argument in other comments. I was just shocked on how desperate you are towards me that you went through my whole comment history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:31 PM
1

Being competitive with other women is not hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:30 PM
1

Competitiveness =/= Hate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:29 PM
1

Could you stop stalking me pls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:28 PM
1

If you read the full comment in which I mentioned that then you would have known that this hate online isn't really hate in practical sense and is rather just competitiveness among women.. https://news.arizona.edu/news/incivility-work-queen-bee-syndrome-getting-worse Across the three studies, we found consistent evidence that women reported higher levels of incivility from other women than their male counterparts," Gabriel said. "In other words, women are ruder to each other than they are to men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:28 PM
1

I have seen a unicorn, your opinion can't change my POV. See how dumb that sounds? If you read the full comment in which I mentioned that then you would have known that this hate online isn't really hate in practical sense and is rather just competitiveness among women.. https://news.arizona.edu/news/incivility-work-queen-bee-syndrome-getting-worse Across the three studies, we found consistent evidence that women reported higher levels of incivility from other women than their male counterparts,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:27 PM
1

But as whole it can't be proven, proof in N=1 does not equal proof for all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:24 PM
1

Some results are arbitary while others are variable dependent. Women having a greater in group bias and men having a greater out group bias is arbitary not variable based. For example the formula for sucrose is C12H22O11 there is no dispute against this, it is an arbitary fact. But the fact that whether electrons revolve around nucleus or just have angular momentum is a disputed idea and not confirmed yet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:21 PM
1

If internalised misogyny was real women should be more biased towards men and men should be more biased toward men. This is not the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:18 PM
1

In group bias means bias towards your own remote community. Women are more biased towards other women while men are more biased toward women according to studies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:16 PM
1

Oh now I realized you are the same person I blocked a couple minutes ago, pls stop bothering me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:15 PM
1

It isn't because if it was then women should not have an in group bias but that's not the case. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:14 PM
1

Again this does not agree with the scientific model as scientific researches have shown women have a great in group bias while men have a great out group bias https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect#:~:text=In%2Dgroup%20bias,-Rudman%20and%20Goodwin&text=This%20research%20found%20that%20while,stronger%20than%20those%20of%20men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:13 PM
1

When did I say testosterone is justification for male behaviour lol, I just said how it differentiates abilities between men and women. Also the testosterone aggression theory has been long debunked so shut up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:12 PM
1

Sorry but multiple studies have shown that differences between men and women are biological and not socialized or conditioned. Infants from as young as 9-17 months of age display gender-stereotypical toy preferences. "Children in the youngest group, who were aged between 9-17 months when infants are able to crawl or walk and therefore make independent selections [were] ... particularly interesting; the ball was a favourite choice for the youngest boys and the youngest girls favoured the cooking …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 03:07 PM
1

While rape is not even considered Here are some statistics on rape and sexual assault of men in India. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/sites/default/files/documents/4978.pdf Not only that, gender parity in sexual abuse and assault is not restricted to the West, as this report on child sexual victimisation in India shows. The major groups studied in this report were child respondents in the age group of 5-18 years, comprising three separate age groups 5-12 years, 13-14 years and 15-18 …
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:44 PM
6

I am also from India. Female on male DV, SA and rape are extremely undereported (due to having no laws against them). Studies show they happen as often as them or even exceed them.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 09:45 AM
9

Here are some statistics on rape and sexual assault of men in India btw. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/sites/default/files/documents/4978.pdf Not only that, gender parity in sexual abuse and assault is not restricted to the West, as this report on child sexual victimisation in India shows. The major groups studied in this report were child respondents in the age group of 5-18 years, comprising three separate age groups 5-12 years, 13-14 years and 15-18 years. The second category of …
/r/MensRights29/07/24 09:05 AM
35

Pregnancy and childbirth are something which men have no right over and thus can't be qualified as "bringing to the table". Women can abort, put the child for adoption or drop it at a police or fire station if they want in which fathers have zero rights over (but still somehow have responsibility over through the virtue of child support). The fact that fathers have zero right over pregnancy and the woman cannot be forced to go through pregnancy unless she wants babies and furthermore fathers do …
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:10 AM
1

The worst part is that youtube deletes your comments for being too antifeminist and you can't link studies or researchers for defending your claims.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 04:08 PM
1

Although there's atleast one leftist group supporting us (r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates).
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:28 PM
2

Married women couldn’t open a bank account with out their husband’s signature untill 1964. They could https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol72/iss4/3 Please stop with your revisionist history. Also men were forced to provide their families at those times and if they didn't they could be imprisoned so not really a point, they had full accountability on it. Plus my article shows that women could infact open bank account without their husbands its just most of them didn't decide to. Also th…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:17 PM
6

Funny how studies show women are more likely to neglect kids when the family is under socioeconomic crisis than fathers but yeah of course your anecdotes hold more value than peer reviewed studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-018-0005-y https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-93348-1_2 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-42608-8_6 https://www.center4research.org/child-abuse-father-figures-kind-families-safest-grow/ https://link.springer.com/chapte…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:29 PM
4

Gpod thing that you brought this up this is going to be my last reply to you today. In Hetero relationships women actually exhibit as much violence as men if not more. For my part, I'd add other studies showing little or no gender differences in injury. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18407042/ In a high school sample "More females reported engaging in physical aggression (40%) than reported being victims of aggression (30%). Fewer males reported engaging in physical aggression (24%) than report…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:06 PM
3

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:02 PM
5

My stanced hasn't changed too and I continue to disagree, have a great day ahead.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:01 PM
5

Ok so let's just agree to disagree on this then.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:59 PM
4

If you choose to ignore 1000s of studies and meta analysis done over the decades then sure, but that doesn't make it factually or universally correct unlike the clinical level studies I provided usinh complex distribution systems.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:57 PM
4

Bruh do you even know how academic level studies work? They use methods, qualified systems and control variables to eliminate biases and get unbiased results. Again googling only gives th reported and sentenced ones not unreported ones so nope.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:47 PM
7

Are you even reading the studies properly? It goes way beyond incarceration. Many men who commit violence, can be bailed out or simply not charged due to legal support or “lack of evidence” Lol this confirms either you are not reading or only reading the first few lines because it uses methods and controlled variables to account for such cases. I have already shown that statistically women use more methods that are less likely to get caught so you don't really have a point here. Besides I always…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:44 PM
5

I’m not reading a 40 page essay that you probably did not read. Conviction, arrest, trial and sentence doesn’t take away from the fact men are responsible for 97% of crimes. Well I actually read studies going over 1000 pages as a maths and physics student (doing masters currently). You are literally variables don't affect final stats at this point ngl. Some men don’t even get charged. And most female victims have higher sentences due to the nature of the crime, the actions involved and how griev…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:41 PM
3

Also cases involving female victims have higher sentences and higher clearences rates while cases with female perpetrators are more likely to have lower sentences and lower clearance rates for the exact same crime. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1164&context=law_econ_current https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1164&context=law_econ_current
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:33 PM
3

Actually there is plenty of evidence to show women are less likely to be convicted, arrested, tried, sentenced and are sentenced way more leniently. Also cases involving female victims have higher sentences and higher clearences rates while cases with female perpetrators are more likely to have lower sentences and lower clearance rates for the exact same crime. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1164&context=law_econ_current https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcont…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:33 PM
3

Bruh I literally provided FBI statistics for it, please improve you reading comprehension "Men are 4 times more likely to die when hitmen hirings are counted in spousal homicide as given the BJS"
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:28 PM
3

Actually there are some sources on it. https://archive.org/details/warren_farrell_women_cant_hear_what_men_dont_say/page/n161/mode/2up?q=But+aren%27t+husbands+more+likely+to+kill+their+wives&view=theater "The brief answer to this accusation is that no one knows for sure which sex kills the other more. In a second we'll see why it's likely that more wives kill husbands, but until the government is willing to collect data about the three female methods of killing, we can only do an educated guess.…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:25 PM
3

The whole onus of crime is getting caught. So whatever ur argument is there is silly in my eyes 😭 women get caught to. So if I murder someone and didn't get caught, I never murdered someone? And there’s no study that suggests women commit violence on an intimate partner or stranger on the same level as much. On intimate partner violence Domestic violence is a gender symmetrical thing. Women initiate most (about 70%). Largest meta-study on domestic violence till date showing that women actually p…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:21 PM
5

Copying and pasting. Ad hominem and no I am not copypasting I am an academic in maths. Doesn’t retract from the fact both men and women are dismissed with violence. The disproportion doesn’t show the greater offences women go though but to each their own 😭 Pulled straight from air without any studies, wow. Imagine dismissing 100s of studies like that.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:18 PM
5

They’re less likely but so are women in opposite sex couples. Any studies for that? Because I have studies showing that men are less likely to report DV than women in hetero relationships. "Brown (2004) found huge discrepancies in arrest and prosecution of spousal assault as a function of gender. Women were four times more likely to report partner violence to police (81% vs. 19%). Stets and Straus (1992a) found women were 10 times more likely to call police in response to partner assault. Brown …
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:12 PM
3

The only one whos coping is you. If you really believe women perpetuate more domestic violence that’s all I need to know Imagine rejecting 2 biggest and the most reputed domesic violence so you can't reject it like that. men still make up 97% of violent crimes. 1: Correlation and causation fallacy 2: They don't actually its much closer in self perpetrated surveys, they are way more likely to get caught.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:09 PM
5

Domestic violence is a gender symmetrical thing. Women initiate most (about 70%). Largest meta-study on domestic violence till date showing that women actually perpetrate more domestic violence than men. PASK Study another meta-analysis showing similar results Now comes the second cope, men inflict more harm. According to many orher studies women commit more clinical level violence in DV as proven by this meta analysis of 91 studies Similar injuries for men and women in DV according to biomedica…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:04 PM
5

Bruh men are less likely to report and in hetrosexual couples women perpetrate more DV and IPV than men (and no not on self defence) Domestic violence is a gender symmetrical thing. Women initiate most (about 70%). Largest meta-study on domestic violence till date showing that women actually perpetrate more domestic violence than men. PASK Study another meta-analysis showing similar results Now comes the second cope, men inflict more harm. According to many orher studies women commit more clinic…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:02 PM
4

Once again this can be said for almost every freaking study in the world using empirical data so what's you point? Should empirical studies be considered useless as most of them use reported data.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:00 PM
4

Ok so tell a better measure for measuring DV than reporting the cases? Once again what exactly in the methodology makes you think that Lesbians are more likely to report Domestic Violence than gay men considering the study using multiple factors and methods to account for such biases and errors?
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:57 PM
5

I know what a controlled variable is. And the source you cited says they have similar rates. Not more or less. Around 28% of male-identifying respondents and 41% of female-identifying respondents reported having been in a relationship where a partner was abusive. ...lesbian women were more likely than gay men to report having been in an abusive same-sex relationship (41% and 28% respectively) (PASK 2016) Are you even reading the same study? Ur argument. Is still all over the place Its not stop p…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:56 PM
6

How the study uses controlled variable systems for abuse by straight men on lesbians and still gives the same output. Comparatively, sexual abuse among heterosexual domestic relationships is estimated to be 4.4% according to the National Institutes of Health. Some epidemiologists may argue that high abuse prevalence among homosexual women includes “lifetime risk”, which incorporates abuse faced in childhood. Yet, when these variables are taken into consideration, we still see alarmingly high rat…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:52 PM
6

If the methodology isn't flawed then the study is 100% correct, that's how data science works. If you say the data is somehow wrong then you have to point a flaw in the methodology itself.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:43 PM
5

Bruh the study you are talking about is from 2011, the one I am talking about are from a range of year from 2006 to 2020.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:41 PM
4

It literally uses surveyed and self reported data of domestic violence over a fixed sample size. What makes you think the methodology survey is skewed in favor of gays? At 297 manuscript pages, the PASK manuscript by Capaldi, Knoble, Shortt, and Kim ( 2012 ) is the most comprehensive literature review on risk factors ever conducted. The authors looked at 877 peer-reviewed studies, of which 228 were analyzed and summarized into the online tables, with 170 derived from adult samples and 58 derived…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:39 PM
5

Can you not even read the study yourself. It literally uses surveyed and self reported data of domestic violence over a fixed sample size.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:36 PM
4

It doesn't ignore it, as I said one of the studies used controlled variable system for identification of domestic violence and even using seld reporting analysis still coming up with the persisting gap. ...lesbian women were more likely than gay men to report having been in an abusive same-sex relationship (41% and 28% respectively) Source Source
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:35 PM
4

PASK study and the other meta analysis I posted happened in 2016 and 2014 respectively. One of the studies goes back to 2006, so nope, there are 3 studied outside the time period you are talking about. ...lesbian women were more likely than gay men to report having been in an abusive same-sex relationship (41% and 28% respectively) Source Please explain this study in which the variables were controlled.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:31 PM
7

Literally all they use is the same study you mentioned which only states that the DV of lesbian women may not be only by lesbians, it doesn't state it comes from men. As I said controlled variable statistics excluding men still show the same results, you can't explain why that happens.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:28 PM
5

I literally linked atleast 7 studies including one meta analysis and you are setiously trying to give me an article not a study. Furthermore nowhere on you article does it state they are abused by men more. Also the largest meta-analysis till date on DV (PASK meta analysis) concludes the same thing. There are hundreds of studies saying that not just one. If you even read the first paragraph you would have known the studies controlled the variables to make it that only lesbian on lesbian violence…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:22 PM
6

That dv stat is incorrect. It’s acc lesbian couples have experienced the most violence from other MEN throughout their lives. And the gay couple stat is incorrect. It is correct multiple other studies have proven it According to a 2011 study produced in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, domestic physical abuse among lesbian cohabiting couples is 35.4%, almost two times the rate of abuse found among heterosexual couples. Other studies place the prevalence of domestic violence among lesbia…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:14 PM
1

Most doesn’t mean all. Again you seem to ignore this study I posted many women could vote before 1st wave feminism, all women couldn't but neither could all men. I’m not saying men don’t suffer under the patriarchy. There is no patriarchy. Gender equality paradox completely debunks patriarchy. According to this phenomenon, the stereotypical differences between men and women become more pronounced in more egalitarian environments. If the patriarchy theory was true then the traditional gender role…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:53 PM
2

I’m not reading all that. You say men and women were in the same boat. But men could still vote. Men weren’t allowed to vote cos they were men. Women weren’t allowed to vote simply cos they were women. This confirms you didn't read the study I sent or even the text which I wrote prooperly. On 6 February 2018, celebrations were held across Britain to commemorate the centenary of the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which gave some women the right to vote for the first time. It says some wom…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:35 PM
5

Then don’t do it ? Women have been oppressed societally for years. A big chunk of that is through other men. Two errors. 1: Revisionism, you are ignoring what happened to men and promoting revisionist history, for example you may say voting rights but: a: Less than 3% people had voting rights before 1850s only those who were property owners(including women who owned propery) , universal suffrage between men and women barely bad a difference of 20 years. b: Men needed to conscript themselves to g…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:05 PM
3

Teaching only boys to respect human being and teaching everyone to respect human beings are miles apart. The first one promotes systemic gynocentrism and hyperagency on men, the second one doesn't. Also what stupid are you following here, I could also conflate my initial argument using the same logic saying "Women should stay away from boys so they shall never get the misfortune to molest them so that they further do not become predators". No one hates women here (nor do I) so please stop accusi…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:31 PM
4

Then neither should boys be taught to respect women, they are not responsible for the actions of other men on women.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:08 PM
13

an interesting thing I noticed When men talk about women's unrealistic standards: You don't have to date women, stop dating women then. When women talk about women's unrealistic standards: Men should improve their standards and stop being so fragile.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/24 09:44 AM
3

Actually some of the studies above are of the 90s. Bentovim (1994) has found that one in five male victims becomes a juvenile offender. Briere and Smiljanich (1993) found that 80% of sexually abused men who reported sexually aggressive behaviour towards women had themselves been sexually abused by women during childhood Hawkins and Williams, 1994
/r/MensRights23/07/24 05:49 PM
9

Sorry I mistyped. Petrovich and Templer (1984) found that 59% of convicted rapists had been molested by females during childhood and that the majority of this abuse was quite severe. This was the research I was referring to.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 05:32 PM
22

Targeting men wasn't enough I guess so now they are also targeting our boys.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:34 PM
84

Teach women to treat boys properly The majority of men who rape women are sexually abused by women in childhood Heterosexual Molestation of Children Who Later Became Rapists This is a report of a serendipitous finding from another study of childhood heterosexual molestation of men who were incarcerated as adults for rape. Subjects were 83 men in a medium security penitentiary who had been convicted of raping women at least 17 years of age. They found that fifty-nine (59%) of the rapists had been…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 09:56 AM
52

And people call r/MensRights and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates echo chambers even though they never ban someone (Unless the comment or post is extremely bigoted).
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/24 09:28 AM
7

Actually black women are more likely to commit crimes in comparison to white women, plus black women are more likely to kill white women than vice-versa.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 02:53 PM
5

If your argument(in your orignal comment) is that online misandry doesn't equate to violence then neither should online pornography and online misogyny, right? Yet feminists continously criticize them saying how they might increase violence against women despite researches showing the polar opposite.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 02:51 PM
9

Then why do feminists criticize video pornography and online misogyny? You realise the people in the screenshot are also discussing about something which was done online?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 02:45 PM
16

Yeah but that would still debunk the hypothesis that men commit suicide because of ToXiC mAsCuLiNiTy despite the idea critized by multiple psychologists.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 03:59 PM
29

Yup, we for sure need more male therapists and psychologists.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 10:30 AM
2

Yup, but even if we look at the gender of the ruler in a war then too it appears that queens were more likely to start wars as proven by the two studies I posted.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 09:59 AM
65

Some relevent statistics and studies on this matter. https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=55305 91% men commiting suicide were in contact of some form of therapy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15579883211014776 Most men attending therapy report being unable to connect with therapy. https://thelatch.com.au/men-mental-health-statistics-australia/ More than half of the men left therapy because it didn't benefit them. https://www.qualitativecriminology.com/pub/z1961qt…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:35 AM
24

Ok so here's another question for you. Do you think the people in the comment section would have reacted the same way if the genders were reversed meaning the man was getting robbed and the three women did not help him. Do you think the comments would have been the same in that case? I think you have got your answer.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 06:25 AM
6

Yup I agree with it, I actually mistyped my orignal comment and forgot to write "not" in it.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 06:22 AM
15

Fr, these feminists should be sent to play oppression olympics, they will for sure get the gold medal.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/24 06:34 PM
274

These are then same people who say "Women do not owe men relationships" when male lonliness is brought up (even though that is not the real reason for male loneliness). Why can't we say that "Men do not owe women protection" when things like these are brought up.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:13 PM
12

[S]uffer more Not saying women don't suffer in wars but saying they suffer MORE THAN MEN is ridiculous. Men get raped too during wars as I proved above in the post using the two articles.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/24 05:48 PM
20

Anyone who has studied history till 7TH grade would know that but I guess the commentor in post didn't lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/24 05:41 PM
71

Domestic violence is a gender symmetrical thing. Women initiate most (about 70%). Largest meta-study on domestic violence till date showing that women actually perpetrate more domestic violence than men. PASK Study another meta-analysis showing similar results According to many studies women commit more clinical level violence in DV as proven by this meta analysis of 91 studies Similar injuries for men and women in DV according to biomedical reports. Source1 Source2 When DV suicides are included…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:50 AM
8

I was going to link some statistics and studies disproving this post but u/Cold_Mongoose161 has already done that along with other important information so thanks to him.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 07:06 PM
1

Nice hypothesis right there dude. And I'm inclined to think that's an evolutionary mechanism linked to how the good social image is a crucial tool in provisioning strategies (the lengths to which men are ready to go for a woman depend on her image, so she wants that image to be as favourable as possible and sees it as an existential threat when that beneficial image begins to be put in question or problematized or just verified). Many women are free of this problem, but it seems to be a frequent…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 04:42 PM
16

Gender equality paradox completely debunks patriarchy. According to this phenomenon, the stereotypical differences between men and women become more pronounced in more egalitarian environments. If the patriarchy theory was true then the traditional gender roles should disappear or atleast reduce in egalitarian environments but they don't and rather become more significant. This cannot happen without the patriarchy according to the femnist theory. Another thing that doesn't support the patriarchy…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 04:04 PM
11

There is no patriarchy. This is just apex fallacy nothing more lol. Besides women are the ones who constitute majority of the votes not men. Also queens started more wars than kings, this is impossible under a patriarchal model
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 03:54 PM
1

Its mostly thought because of the physical difference between men and women, what they forget is that women can still hit men with a bat or throw a glass at them in domestic violence which is as force as beating. I am saying this without misandry (hopefully at least), but the discrepancy between the common perception and the reality of the ratios is very concerning. Its the basically the same things as blacks and whites in US, blacks are way more likely to get convicted or arrested. Same happens…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 03:36 PM
7

obviously it was a trans woman, CHECKM8 INCELS /s.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:17 PM
31

and kicked me in the balls more than once. That's definitely sexual assault. So she literally physically and sexually assaulted you with full intent and literally faced 0 consequences. Nice male privilege.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:12 PM
11

lol, but this is an interesting observation. I have also seen that women do like to get competitive with each other and then call each other slangs like these in the process.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 06:39 PM
41

Women actually perpetrate half if not a majority of the online misogyny. This first study here was conducted by demos in 2014, which concluded women make atleast half of all the misogynistic comments on social media. https://demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/MISOGYNY_ON_TWITTER.pdf Women are as almost as likely as men to use the terms ‘slut’ and ‘whore’ on Twitter. Not only are women using these words, they are directing them at each other, both casually and offensively; women are increasingl…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 04:27 PM
6

misandry + misogyny + homophobia + racism Nice.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 04:07 PM
2

Ah yes the internalised misogyny argument. I wonder why men can't have internalised misogyny but women can. Its basically saying that women aren't inherently evil when they do bad but somehow men are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 12:45 PM
9

Tired of seeing this cope on domestic violence so posting this Domestic violence is a gender symmetrical thing. Women initiate most (about 70%). Largest meta-study on domestic violence till date showing that women actually perpetrate more domestic violence than men. PASK Study another meta-analysis showing similar results Now comes the second cope, men inflict more harm. According to many orher studies women commit more clinical level violence in DV as proven by this meta analysis of 91 studies …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 12:06 PM
1

Actually I am new here (joined this sub a month ago) but I had previously seen some of your comments on this sub on previous posts.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 03:59 PM
7

r/MenGetRapedToo
/r/MensRights11/07/24 10:11 AM
2

Male disposability I know what you are talking about here but doesn't that mean that women should be forced to give birth with men they can't choose (atleast 2 or 3) to compensate for the people who died in war since the only reason for saving them going by this logic is because they can give birth, if a saved woman doesn't give birth then there was no practical difference between saving her and a man considering the male disposability argument, hence is we argue that women should give be saved …
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:57 PM
4

So then by this logic in times of disaster, war, catastrophe or something like that should government put a womb registry on women in which women would be forced to give to birth to babies. By this logic every women saved first in times of war, disaster or casualties should be forced to give birth with the men they can't choose in order to compensate for the lives of the dead people.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:47 PM
9

You are wrong men in male prisons are mostly raped by female staffs while women in female prisons are mostly raped by female inmates. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_rape_in_the_United_States Male sexual victimization was more frequently perpetrated by the staff, whereas the perpetrator for female inmates was more frequently another inmate. Obviously all the inmates in female prisons are women so most women who are raped in prisons are raped by other women. As for the rape of male inmates…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 02:36 PM
8

Are you seriously dismissing mountains of peer reviewed studies and meta-analysis just because they go against your personal experiance or anecdotes?
/r/MensRights09/07/24 02:32 PM
7

Why are people downvoting this? This is correct. Nope its blatantly false. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_rape_in_the_United_States Male sexual victimization was more frequently perpetrated by the staff, whereas the perpetrator for female inmates was more frequently another inmate. Obviously all the inmates in female prisons are women so most women who are raped in prisons are raped by other women. As for the rape of male inmates by the staff, it is mostly done by female staff, here are …
/r/MensRights09/07/24 02:26 PM
5

How can women rape other women considering in this case the women who is the offender can't penetrate and the women who is the victim can't be forced to penetrate. I guess by rubbing her clitoris over another women's clitoris or by using an object to penetrate the other women.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 02:04 PM
7

You are right and we do have statistics for the gender of the perpetrators in male and female prisons. You have already provided the data on the fact that rape in female prisons are more common in male prisons considering the percentages so I won't be covering that again. As for the gender of the perpetrator here are some studies on it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_rape_in_the_United_States Male sexual victimization was more frequently perpetrated by the staff, whereas the perpetrator …
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:49 PM
1

Part- 3/3 You can cry and scream but it won’t change my nation’s unfortunate history I am Indian too btw. Look I am not saying women don't face issues but so do men the problem is that feminists love claiming issues of men aren't real which is the probelm here, we are not here to play oppression olympics. The truth is that most history you are referring to is quite revionist, considering a high amount of homicide, infanticide and malnutrition of boys in today's era, I can't even think what would…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 07:56 PM
1

Part-2/3 Okay so on infanticide let's start by the most basic data we have available. https://www.latestlaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/National-Crime-Record-Bureau-Report-NCRB-2010.pdf "In 2010, the National Crime Records Bureau reported approximately 100 male and female infanticides, producing an official rate of less than one case of infanticide per million people". Straight up it looks quite low to be honest. Now I know you will be saying that this is likely caused by underreported cases…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 07:44 PM
1

Part-1/3 Per capita rape assesses the entire country as lone while rapes against women are more concentrated in certain states especially metros. https://www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/cities/delhi/2023/Dec/05/delhi-tops-19-metros-in-rape-cases-ncrb-data-2638627.html Are you even reading your own sources girl? It says delhi has the highest reportd rapes for women. The city, on average, has recorded three rape cases every day, taking the total sexual assault cases registered to 1,212 Delhi po…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 06:15 PM
2

Bro is back.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 04:49 PM
1

The difference is that MRA movement relies on statistics and nuance more while feminism relies on hypothesis and assumptions more. Over the years this sub had brilliant brilliant people who made posts statistically analysing feminist claims and debunking them. Two things can be true at once. Men are undervalued and rape against them is not a crime in India which is horrendous. One woman is raped in India every twenty minutes. Cry, scream, throw up and both things will always be true. Rapes rates…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 04:42 PM
1

Rapes rates in India are extremely low Read the second paragraph, it says India has been characterised as one of the "countries with the lowest per capita rates of rape" keep in kind that this has 5 different citations The percentage is even lower taking into account the total Indian population 1.41 billion, while the wikipedia page says that 31,617 rapes were reported last year, doing the math would give you a percentage of about 0.00219858%. Martial Rape is a form of domestic violence in India…
/r/MensRights04/07/24 04:41 PM
1

Part 2/2 B irrelevant to the fact it’s violently misogynistic and allowed to remain Also you’re deliberately ignoring what was referenced. How exactly is women posting watching more violent and misogynistic (in comparison to men as I proved by statistics and studies above, before saying bullshit this consider seeing the studies and debunk the studies if you still are against this fact) porn the fault of men, are we supposed to stop them from watching violent porn? I think that's also misogyny as…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 10:39 AM
1

“I think misogyny is simply a kink because I fundamentally lack empathy for women” Every single one of you defending that sub. 1: I have already proven most of the people watching those videos are women. 2: There's is no evidence whatsoever for proving that violent porn makes someone more misogynistic. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1524838020942754?journalCode=tvaa http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html https://www.springer.com/abou…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 10:38 AM
1

Part 2/2 Also how do you know those are actually women and not men just posting images of women? Oh right, you don’t and you don’t care. You can check their bio, they all have put the links to their onlyfans account. Also “all”? No because literally two of the mods themselves are males. But as per usual that will be excused and enabled. The other 4 are women, so statically that's 66.6% women and 33.3% percent men, seems like more women to me, also are the 4 women excused and all the other who wa…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 10:01 AM
1

Part 1/2 Men are the ones who create the market for that content. Because men despise women and have made that abundantly clear through your support of violent misogyny Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band,…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 09:51 AM
1

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama. She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly f…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 09:50 AM
1

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama. She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly f…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 09:45 AM
3

“Its not the criticism of misogyny” “vile man hating sub” Female pessimist is literally just a sub for women to vent. None of the women there promote violence against men and it’s literally against the rules to do so. They do just look at some of the posts and they clearly do that, stop ignoring this. But that’s what you want to complain about instead of acknowledging the hundreds of male subs that actually promote violence against women. I literally proved that all the people posting on r/Women…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 02:10 AM
5

Ok here are the top 10 hot posts on r/WomenAreThings https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/eaKol2A4S1 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/Mi2lcEWRVZ https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/QiSimiP5N1 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/vawXPq7vmg https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/fLH0bNwETL https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/kw8dc3Lhsx https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/o5eEVN8OMi https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/FcHQYMvn4b https://www.reddit.com/…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 02:06 AM
2

Ok here are the top 10 hot posts on r/WomenAreThings https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/eaKol2A4S1 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/Mi2lcEWRVZ https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/QiSimiP5N1 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/vawXPq7vmg https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/fLH0bNwETL https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/kw8dc3Lhsx https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/o5eEVN8OMi https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/FcHQYMvn4b https://www.reddit.com/…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:43 AM
5

Blatant misogyny also only points out misogyny on reddit, also r/MensRights and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates ban people for criticising women so what's you point considering these subreddits are dedicated to men's rights? Most of the people posting r/WomenAreThings are literally female onlyfans creators so stop capping, just check out the subreddit for yourself and you will figure it out. You should be critizing women if you are against these subs not men considering the people posting on these subre…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:38 AM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/Aa5EkVBNdS https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/5gioEvAm1j https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/XVvi39zuOu https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/hFWkQdAWqJ
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:35 AM
2

Bruh all the people posting it are women and not men, just open the subreddit and check it out yourself. Plus what about r/misandrykink its pretty much the same thing, besides most people on posting on r/misandrykink are women too.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:27 AM
4

Ok let me give a run down of that space https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/cUaxstp170 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/RN0OfXLBOT https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/1uA55Mbbi3 https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/zjl1MBOXtc https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/xjsHMPBOlK These are the top 5 posts there, just go to these posts and open the account of the OP literally all of them are women lol. Most of the people posting on r/womenarethings and r/misogynisticlife a…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:26 AM
5

Femalepessimist doesn’t promote raping or murdering men. In fact it’s explicitly against the rules Then wtf is the KAM posts there along with the another post that said to throw old men out of the house. Woman saying she sees why some women hate men after seeing violently misogynistic content referring to women as things= evil, hateful, misandrist For the last time it is supposed to be a kink subreddit and not to promote real things, what about r/misandrykink should we also start complaining abo…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 01:21 AM
5

Domestic Violence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 05:10 PM
9

Female Genital Mutilation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 05:09 PM
8

Don't bother replying bro, I tried to debate as peacefully and softly as I could using zero assumptions and only statistics and peer reviewed studies, yet you can see how am I being called.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 04:50 PM
10

I was literally trying to debate there from a logical and benevolent pov yet I am getting called a misogynist and incel by that sub lol
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 04:40 PM
7

find me when I said, that watching very violent porn is totally ok or watching very violent porn is totally not ok. i never said either, I was totally neutral. The source thing happens very frequently on reddit so it would be natural for anyone to assume that what I said needed sources to back up. Look I wasn't forcing you read those studies, I was just saying that as a form of evidence. Its called empirical analysis, I wasn't shoving it down your throat. Ok, I will never ever comment on that su…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 04:23 PM
14

I have no idea when I forced you to look into those studies, I just linked them in case you wanted to see them as a proof of my claim, otherwise people would have shouted "SoUrCe". Again I am not forcing you to read those studies but imagine dismissing proper peer reviewed and methodologised researches like that. I was totally neutral on pornography on the comment I made so stop projecting. How was I defending men's violent misogyny exactly considering I proved that women watch more violent porn…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 04:17 PM
11

Men who watch porn on abuse of women are wrong ------> Women who watch porn of abuse of women are also wrong (who as I proved by studies are higher in number) Women who watch porn of abuse of women are not wrong -------> men who watch porn of abuse of women are also not wrong In a logically consistent scenario, only one of these can be true, choose yourself which one is true. Guessing by your comments you are anti porn, and you would likely go with the first scenario. Oh and if you don't know (-…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 04:12 PM
20

DV killings are exactly equal for men and women if you include sucides, morever all murderers irrespective of their gender have been shown to target men more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 01:09 PM
58

FGM is also a good point, its mostly done by other women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 12:25 PM
12

I made a comment too on that comment. https://www.reddit.com/r/femalepessimist/s/p5ewZr9CKB
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 11:36 AM
24

Feminists: Men don't open up or vent. Also feminists when men open up and vent:
/r/MensRights02/07/24 08:57 AM
3

Rapes rates in India are extremely low Read the second paragraph, it says India has been characterised as one of the "countries with the lowest per capita rates of rape" keep in kind that this has 5 different citations The percentage is even lower taking into account the total Indian population 1.41 billion, while the wikipedia page says that 31,617 rapes were reported last year, doing the math would give you a percentage of about 0.00219858%. Martial Rape is a form of domestic violence in India…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 02:43 PM
1

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is not filled with woke or extreme leftists, the community is softly left at best.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 02:27 PM
1

Part 1/n The media emphasizes rape in India too often. So many viral news stories about gang rapes that happened and so many people saying it's dangerous as a woman to travel in India because they'll get raped. According to the National Family Health Survey in India, where they surveyed 83,703 women in India in a nationally representative sample, they found 8.5% of women in India report being victims of sexual violence at least once in their lifetime, but it's unknown how many of these incidents…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 02:25 PM
1

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is also good.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 01:36 PM
45

There are meta analysis and studies proving this that the stereotype that hiring is biased against women doesn't actually exist and its actually the other way around. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560 https://www.ky3.com/2022/11/08/1-6-hiring-managers-have-been-told-stop-hiring-white-men-survey-finds/ https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1418878112 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130005 https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/re…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/24 01:05 PM
2

I would call it oligarchy or tribalism I guess.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 04:16 PM
3

honestly this is just biology at work, it pretty much works the same in animals, look up the sexual patterns of worker bees, mice, chimpanzees, orangutans and elephants, they are pretty much the same. I would call such a society a bio essentialist tribe or an oligarchy where only the people at the top of the pyramid benefit. Keep in mind that practices like these are not common and neccessary in modern society thus modern society is rather socialist and humanist in comparison to the past (althou…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 02:05 PM
1

Do you have a discord that might be a better place to talk.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 01:34 PM
3

Men definitely had a higher responsibility throughout history and I have a reason for it, from a biological perspective men are way more disposable and expendable than women (1 man can impregante 100 women but the same can't happen the other way around). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_expendability This gave two outputs: 1: For women it was almost certain that they would get to procreate, for men it wasn't instead it depended on their social value and genes (both of which were reflected th…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 01:31 PM
3

Both men and women lacked it, men were forced to fight wars, protect, provide and work and were used like machines while women were forced to birth babies and were used as incubators.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 01:19 PM
7

Stuff like how “marital rape” didn’t used to exist, People on r/MensRights and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates have done pretty good analysis on it. Marital was for sure not legal, here are two analysis on it. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/Zo53us8Gcv https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/mC8zLaImOb Marital rape was not legal for sure and husbands could definetly be charged for it. article about same in detail adultery has been a crime in many times and places. There is a co…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 12:53 PM
9

this is by far the best opinion I have seen on this. Saying that men have held the majority of the power is a quite reductionist claim and vague observation to be honest, looking from biological, anthropological and evolutionary viewpoints and using basic power dynamics women hold as much if not more power than men. There is no patriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 12:10 PM
3

Feminists: Literally protesting against men's issue and men's rights events u/bluehorserunning: but are feminists really they mad about it?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:40 AM
14

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:41 PM
8

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:40 PM
10

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:40 PM
10

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:37 PM
13

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:36 PM
8

Feminists and women actively protest against mens shelters being formed, what would you like to say about that? Here are 10 different occassions on which this happened Feminists in spain protesting aginst men's shelter Feminists in Italy protesting against men's shelter Feminism protesting against male only homeless shelters Feminists protesting against men's food shelters Feminists protesting against men's homeless shelter in US Erin Pizzey an MRA getting death threats from feminists after sett…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:11 PM
27

that sub is totally getting ruined at this point unfortunately.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/24 04:56 PM
57

how can something be toxic and fragile at the same time? Ironically what they are saying happens actually, (some not all ;D) women often comment on how men look like "creeps" or "perverts" in certain outfits and they also love to describe what a "real man" and "masculinity" are in their perspective, and don't even get me started on how some of them literally call you gay for simply disagreeing with them. Male lonliness is constantly downplayed by feminists and they constantly say that its not a …
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/24 04:34 PM
10

I am a maths and physics student and pretty much the same happens in my class, most girls in my collegedo not find maths and physics to interesting and intriguing (though I do) but rather boring thus many of them want the syllabus to be changed to be more interesting.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 04:03 PM
2

lol 🤣🤣.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 07:11 AM
3

You should go through the comments, they are even better lol.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 07:08 AM
4

I know, yet there are unlimited quotas for women in STEM. Btw complex and imaginary numbers aren't comparable so saying "won't even advance one iota" is mathematically wrong though ;)
/r/MensRights25/06/24 05:45 AM
3

But the sad truth is that men will always be treated as more disposable and expendable than women in our society, the in group disposability of a man only depends on their ability to protect and provide. The is really something that Occurs at the biological level and there isn't reallyna defined way to fix it.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 02:04 AM
18

The most disturbing thing is that how exactly did she figure out OP's actual location, that's extremely terrifying.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/24 05:34 AM
83

Is there benevolent racism against whites as blacks are given higher sentences? You can't say its benevolent discrimination when it suits your narrative and say it isn't benevolent discrimination when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 10:00 AM
8

So ignoring the unfalsiable part, the gap is only of 2%-3% right, that's pretty even.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:34 AM
12

Just imagine if a man did that 💀💀.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:30 AM
2

Thanks dude.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 10:23 PM
1

Thanks bro.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 05:22 PM
1

Thanks dude.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 05:22 PM
8

I have pointed this out countless times and most feminists claim that forced to penetrate is not as severe as penetration by force (I personally believe that FTP is as worse but I don't have any sources to back it up). Do we have any studies showing impact of forced to penetrate on men and how it is comparable to rape?
/r/MensRights16/06/24 05:44 AM
1

Don't men have larger hippocamus and temporal lobe which are directly linked to memory. Also men have higher volumes of inferior-pareiral lobule which is linked to maths, logic, estimating time and juding speed and also bigger amygdala which is linked to spatial awareness, reaction and spotting. Plus men also have better front to back connections meaning that they can have better communication betwern frontal lobe (memory, impluse control, motor function, social interaction and problem solving) …
/r/MensRights14/06/24 06:53 PM
2

Penis Envy is real.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/24 02:49 PM
6

Finally a sensible woman.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:18 AM
6

You realise the same can be said for women considering only men were seen as the providing and protecting gender, which was one of the reason why men had the voting rights because they were seen as the class which had the responsibility to serve and provide and not women.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:59 PM
27

The society first villainizes and antagonizes young men, and when these men turn into antagonists and villains the society blames these men for their actions.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 08:41 AM
10

r/FeMRADebates is also a good sub.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:36 PM
27

Its literally a sub of either cucks and simps or feminists cosplaying as men. I remember when someone of r/feminism said that "For anyone interested in supporting men's issues check out men's lib which is a way more reasonable sub" that was the moment I knew how men's lib would be, on visiting the sub It became apparent that my thoughts on it were right.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:30 PM
3

if A⊂B and z∈A then z∈B Thus if any person is a woman then she must also be a female as women are a subset of females. You should have revised set theory before writing this comment.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:29 PM
101

It is simply a part of the women are wonderful effect both men and women are more empathetic and biased towards women with women having a far greater bias.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 02:24 PM
2

I think periods can be seen as a disadvantage considering 98% mammals do not have periods and can still reproduce, only higher order primates have to go through it.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:02 AM
22

To everyone saying "pregnancy", I think one thing should be noted that the ability of women to get pregnant is exactly the cause of Male Expendability so pregnancy can be seen as an advantage in this respect as men are more expendable due to that reason.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:32 PM
3

Nope they aren't that different in actuality , here's an article discussing both PPD in men and women and they are quite similar. https://www.unitypoint.org/news-and-articles/male-postpartum-depression--unitypoint-health "A lot of people try to simplify postpartum depression as just the drop in hormones that women experience. If that were the case, we wouldn’t see depression in other people besides the actual person who physically gave birth. With male postpartum depression, research suggests th…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:00 PM
7

That's not the point of this post. The OP is trying to say that how when a women does something like this, it is usually blamed on PPD or some other mental health condition like that and we are told 'not to judge her' while when a man does it is blamed on toxic masculinity, misogyny and he is said to be narcissistic or lazy. The point of the post was to address this double standard of how people aren't sympathetic for men and their mental health. Before you ask, yes men can suffer from post-part…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:34 PM
2

Bruh men can suffer from post-partum depression, approximately 1 in 10 men suffer from PPD. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659987/
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:06 PM
7

Men can get post-partum depression bro https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659987/
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:02 PM
6

In terms of being messed up.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/24 03:26 PM
13

Go through the comments, they are even better.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/24 01:31 PM
4

True, I think the same should be done to these feminists. I mean what's the problem with men having a DV Shelter for themselves, I can't reason why these feminists are protesting against it.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:17 PM
13

The men would have surely been imprisoned by now if this was the case
/r/MensRights30/05/24 01:58 PM
1

In the 8TH pic, this guy tries to debunk the same logic that misandrists use for hating men (bad experiance with some men).
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/24 10:55 AM
7

Apparently sl*t shaming women and cyberbullying them also only hurts their feelings so feminists shouldn't have any problem with that..... Wait P.S.- Not supporting sl*t shaming or cyberbullying in any way, totally against them.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 10:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter