TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Alive_Time Archive

View 2 posts and 93 comments by Alive_Time on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
34

Alive_Time/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:50 PM
13

CMVAlive_Time/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Guys in those fields don't waste time in college and get married early.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:58 AM
1

For the most part we are in a post marriage society. Dating has replaced marriage for most.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 10:28 PM
1

Agreed but here we are. I guess we will all have to pay higher taxes until / if society snaps out of the craziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 07:01 PM
3

But there are kids who have done nothing to "deserve" their environment. The rest of society ends up paying to feed, clothe, and shelter these kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:38 PM
1

We go so far out of our way as a species to go against natural sexual reproduction. The only species going out of it's way to prevent reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 06:34 PM
1

It is a matter of fact that women take on all the risk regarding pregnancy and reproduction. Women have to go through a grueling pregnancy and delivery which commonly killed them in the ancient world. Women can reproduce at max once every 9 months vs potentially every day for men. Women must consume more calories during pregnancy (food was much more difficult to obtain in the ancient world). The ancient world was much more violent and women had to be physically protected from tribal war and rape…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 07:29 PM
2

Humans are quick to complain and slow to take action. Complaining is the most the vast majority will ever do in response to a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 04:40 PM
1

This is simply objectively false. You are claiming prior to Christianity female monogamy was uncommon. You are straight up lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 04:38 PM
1

This is complete made up BS and you know it. Prior to birth control in the ancient world women had more to lose/risk from sex. You are making up BS as you text
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 10:45 AM
3

Evolutionary biology has no impact on human sexual behaviors and mating practices. All that matters are videos we see on social media and tik tok from content creators. They have the answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 02:04 PM
4

Kanye West is labeled an incel. Labels have almost no meaning. Don't worry about being labeled.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 01:52 AM
1

Folks don't like facts
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 01:45 AM
1

That's definitely the popular view. If it works for you and you got the outcomes you wanted great!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 08:52 PM
1

Does source = a paid service you're offering with limited seats available?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 07:28 AM
1

Most of modern society does not encourage early marriage so that will make it tough. A 100 years ago it was the expectation for most of society. Getting married right before menopause would have been insane pre baby boomer generation but here we are. Are you maximizing your chances by visiting larger churches and involving yourself in activities? You may be able to find a church with a higher ratio of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:52 AM
2

If you want a virgin spouse get married really young. Otherwise you were never really 100%, serious. Expecting most healthy people to not orgasm shortly after puberty is delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:08 AM
1

Sympathy doesn't really help many people outside of a successful go fund me. Hopefully a man in his 30s is going for more than sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:39 PM
1

Not necessarily you but a woman who says this could change her mind at any time. Maybe the man is pro life and an unwanted abortion would weigh on his concious. These are good conversations to have up front.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:30 PM
0

Maybe nothing to do with you or maybe you are valuable enough to him that you are worth the risk. After all there is always risk. This is all hypothetical. If he's older and has more resources he can take the financial hit of an accidental pregnancy that results in a child. Maybe he sees you as a woman he would wife if any of the above happened. A younger guy may not be in a financial position to marry if there is an accidental pregnancy. Maybe you are the one for him and you are both mature eno…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:19 PM
0

What if he just didn't want to take the risks that come with sex such as potential STDs, unwanted pregnancy, false patternity, unwanted abortions, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:01 PM
5

Great post. Extremes are rarely reality. The binary one extreme side or the other positions (while ignoring nuance) are driving a lot of people into raged frenzies. Thanks for the balanced post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:07 PM
1

Queue the "bonding hormones are a myth" comments. The amount varies but they do exist and during release some develop stronger bonds than others. One could have a lasting bond and for others it's "just sex". Both may be speaking the truth as we don't all release the same amount of bonding hormones during sex. If a man or woman has a low release of bonding hormones don't expect a strong or long lasting monogomous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:44 PM
1

Each man has a different level of hormones/testosterone. The human brain is too complex to throw everyone in the same time frame. Of course you can speak for yourself but humans vary quite a bit when it comes to sexual behaviors, patterns, attraction, attachment styles, level of bonding hormones, separating fantasy from reality. It's almost always on a case by case individual basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 03:12 PM
0

LTR? No. Marriage? Yes almost every woman I know with high body counts can't get in or stay in a long term functional marriage. I only know of one exception. Pair bonding is a real thing despite the science denial. However most of this is due to society encouraging the delay of marriage. Telling men and women to wait until 30 something for marriage is insane and led to our current state. Men and women are not biologically designed for high body counts. The most successful marriages I've seen wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:33 AM
1

I don't think it is as dangerous. Daily binge eating can lead to obesity, heart disease, and death. It could take years to lose the weight. Frequent porn use, like you said, requires a (in most cases) very short return to baseline. a 2-5 day refraction rebuild is average. The human reproduction system is extremely reselient. Over use won't lead to death but a temporary low to no orgasm for in most cases a days in extreme cases a few weeks. Folks comparing porn to crack or heroin are delusional. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:21 AM
1

That's called the refraction period. You go without sex your sexual biology desires it more. Kind of like you aren't hungry after binge eating after a buffet. Don't eat for two days and you will tear through the food. Basic biology. It's not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 01:33 AM
3

Rabbits also don't use any form of birth control. Blowing a load to porn is a form of birth control
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:30 AM
1

You are getting a digital quick fix vs doing the real thing. I would compare it to sports video games and TV vs playing a sport. Watching football or playing sports video games allows you to watch others doing things you can't in real life. It requires no real skill or effort. But you also never get good at playing sports in real life playing video games. In fact if you play sports video games and never excercise it harms your health. On the positive side you run no risk of injury. Weigh those r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:28 AM
0

The 5'1 guy will end up in jail for assault that night if he barely makes accidental contact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 05:09 PM
1

Sorry for the ambiguity. I meant men who may tell you not to focus on their sexual history.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 01:59 AM
1

The man may be religious, sexually-risk adverse, a product of a transient childhood, asexual, socially awkward, obese, previously abused, unattractive, and more than likely a combination of 3 or more above. If religious and you expect a virgin hopefully you have built wealth and prepared to limit your options to the small amount of women in a strict fundamentalist religion. If you venture to dating outside of religion expect almost every woman you date will be sexually experienced. This will lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 01:56 AM
1

Maybe or at minimum don't justify it but acknowledge these things exist and intervene early to minimize there being victims. Early intervention, counseling, heck even pivoting to a doll (as sick as that is to me) is better than abusing another human especially a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 04:45 PM
2

When men respond with "the past doesn't matter all that matters is now" how do you respond?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 04:39 PM
1

That's a fair question. With marriage trends shifting so rapidly in less than half of a century my guess is it will take time to gather the data and come to better conclusions. I've read a few studies and all have stated those with 0-1 sex partners have the best marital satisfaction. It drops at 2 and goes up at 3-9 and drops off the map at 10 or more. That's just a few studies and not nearly enough to draw conclusions. But what is the cause? Some argue those with no previous sex partners might …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 03:47 PM
1

The question in my mind is which group has the best marital outcomes?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 02:55 PM
1

It depends on the person. For you it might be cheating. Some even believe masturbation or using a sex toy is cheating. Some believe any form of premarital sex is cheating on your future spouse. Others believe it is an acceptable boundary. Instead of accepting we are all different and communicating differences up front human beings fall into the fallacy that we all view everything exactly the same which leads to so many problems. Folks even become outraged when there is a simple difference of opi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 02:52 PM
1

True less than 1% are polygamous and sex before marriage is forbidden. Still in both religious systems 99% have one spouse It's strange to me how folks default to extremely rare examples to justify having unlimited sex partners prior to marriage. At minimum can we agree the two are extremes of one another? I'm not arguing morality. It's just bizarre to me how it's accepted to sleep around before a ceremony but supposedly shocking and surprising when people can't break that behavior post ceremony…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:34 PM
2

Less than 1% of Muslim men practice polygamy. Over 99% who are married are in a monogamous marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:32 AM
1

Fewer than 1% of Christians and Muslims are in polygamous relationships. Sex before marriage is forbidden in both religions. Those religions drive government and religious laws in the vast majority of the world for almost 2000 years. Older doesn't mean better but it's interesting we hold on to the religious ceremony and same expectations post marriage. But pre marriage there are almost no rules at all for many people. Certainly no religious based rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:31 AM
2

Great point
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:15 AM
0

I'm not sure where you are going with this. Christianity spread and became the dominate religion by population. There is more than just one factor that led to the religion spreading. For instance it formed and spread during the height of the Roman Empire and spread further via European colonization. Trying to pin Christian monogomy spreading based solely on a small subset of Catholic bishops and kings is an extreme under representation of history. Christianity had already spread to the eastern h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:10 AM
0

It was literally taught by Jesus and Paul in the New Testament. That is the basis of Western Civilization's morality. That alone doesn't make it right or wrong but that is what formed the basis of marriage in the West for almost 2000 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:00 AM
0

True I'm talking the Christian Judean tradition that 4 billion people follow. The Greeks and Romans were freaky
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 10:46 PM
0

I didn't say that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 09:41 PM
2

I don't believe that and not making that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 09:39 PM
1

I think people should weigh the risks costs and benefits regarding sexual lifestyle and live with the outcome. Hopefully results in the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 08:42 PM
1

I believe people should do whatever works best for them . We are all different I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 08:41 PM
1

Some people literally don't care others do. We are all different.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 08:38 PM
0

In the rare case your spouse dies yes. But thats clearly not the case with most people these days with high body counts. Is there anyone who has had multiple spouses die over and over again. This would be a small almost insignificant number.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:40 PM
2

You do have to factor in those who consume more. In the high body count threads i often see "your past doesn't matter it doesn't matter how many you have had". We can dismiss this scenario but it comes up frequently and a hot topic these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:37 PM
2

I was directing this towards both men and women. Not referring to the myth of vaginas reshaping (that is a myth and i agree) I do accept the scientific fact that bonding hormones exist. Primarily vasopressin in men and oxytocin in women (though men also produce oxytocin). Each human produces varying levels of these bonding hormones and some are more intense than others. This is why some folks are clingy, stalkerish, or become obsessed while others can hit it and quit it during casual sex. So I t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:34 PM
1

Outside of being a widow I don't know of any other teachings in the bible that allow for remarrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:11 PM
6

There are 20,000 christian denominations. I have no doubt there are churches that allow for this. Of course it's not what Jesus taught. Whoever divorces his wife, except on the grounds of porneia (sexual immorality), makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” (Matthew 5:31-32).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:28 PM
3

It's almost like rules that challenge human sexual biology are not very effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:25 PM
0

Or just understand that the words unlimited and average are not contradictory. Averages and variation can coexist in the same data set.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:18 PM
1

In the most extreme case this could mean just don't have an orgy but feel free to sleep with someone new every day. Traditionally monogamy meant one sex partner for life at least according to the 1300-2000 year old traditions that 4 billion people follow (christianity amd islam). I agree in the modern secular West monogomy could mean anything other than threesomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:15 PM
2

I could paste the posts but to your point we are all internet strangers and folks could be lying. I just dont think many of them are. In the age of hook up apps and the amount of folks i personally know who have brought home different women from bars every weekend I dont think it's out of the realm of reality. Not the norm but common enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:12 PM
6

If a restaurant serves unlimited hot wings there will be an average amount eaten per person. Some will eat 4, others 10, some will eat 100. It doesn't mean the restaurant is not honoring unlimited wings because you can calculate an average. The point is there seems to be no cap with many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:09 PM
-1

If a restaurant has unlimited pancakes there are folks who will eat 1, 4or 30
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:57 PM
6

I agree marriage is more than sex. But infidelity is often the deal breaker despite having companionship and love.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:55 PM
5

It might. Like you said it depends on the individual and desired outcome. If a man has STDs, child support, multiple kids, and is never satisfied with one woman he may have a tough time settling down. Maybe past behavior does influence present and future outcomes. Of course it may not. Depends on the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:50 PM
3

I see many posts of men and women posting they had 100+ sex partners prior to marriage with "no judgement your past doesn't matter" for most of the replies. I believe my own eyes. Speaking in absolutes "no one" defeats any honest attempt at discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:48 PM
4

It depends on what we are talking about. The 2000 year old Catholic church pushed life long monogomy and has over a billion adherent's. Preists are not even allowed to have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:46 PM
4

That seems to suggest past behavioral patterns and activities have no impact on the future. Whether it's sex, excercise, learning a new language, eating habits, we are creatures of habit and past experiences that influence our present and future state. Many people seem to believe this does not occur with sexual patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:44 PM
3

Yeah I'm talking ideal standards and what was held in high regards. There was also Lots of theft, rape, and murder despite their being moral laws against it. Again I'm not arguing everyone followed the moral standards placed in society. Different topic
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:42 PM
0

The ancient laws and religions had standards and laws on widow remarriage and rape. Again the topic at hand is ideal standards. If your spouse didn't die and if you were not raped the standard was lifelong monogomy. That doesn't make it right or wrong but it seems we are already starting off on a red herring full of ancedotes to drive the conversation off course.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:29 PM
-1

I'm talking standards not ancedotal anomalies like tragic early death of a spouse or rape during war. you could be raped and that could be more than one sex partner. But in general the idea standard was lifelong monogomy per civilization. I agree biology doesn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:09 PM
1

It's different for every individual. The shock-value content creators are monetized by throwing all men and women into one bucket or the other. There is radicalization separating two groups into extremists tribes of one position or the other. There is almost infinite nuance to each individual and couples sexual dynamic. There are risks outside of a pure sexual monogomy including STDs, unwanted pregnancy, false patternity, and unwanted abortions. Folks will get triggered by this but it's obvious …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 06:28 PM
11

99.9999999% of species can figure out sex pretty easy. But folks want to pretend humans need a decade of practice to have sex to justify their past. Complete BS. I agree with you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 05:54 AM
-2

His sexual biology that drove him to sleep with a high number of women stops because of a ceremony, because he "found love in you"? To each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 05:51 AM
1

That's where we disagree. Everything in the universe is a product of natural evolution including technology and various uses for fruit (food, sex, extraction for vitamins amd medications, getting high on caffeine, nicotine etc). Cow poop is used to make bricks and fuel. Again I think that's part of evolution. All these things manifest from the natural universe not an artificial alternate fictional dimension.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:22 PM
1

Other animals masturbate. Chimps, bonobos, and gorillas have oral sex. Evolution manifests this sexual activity in multiple species.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:15 PM
1

The term "made to" indicates a designer/god
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:54 PM
1

When you say "not meant to be" that's the religious/ agent argument. It can't be argued as now you are saying reality as it exists is "not meant to be"? Vs what some hypothetical system that doesn't and has never existed?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:31 PM
1

You said it serves no purpose it does. Now you are trying to assign agenticity which I never did.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:46 PM
1

Yes but it does keep sex organs primed and healthy. Sexual entropy is real. Like anything else if you excercise the organ it gets stronger. Not only sex organs but every other organ. Heart, brain, muscles. Use it or it becomes weak. Masturbation is common amongst other primate species. Supressing is not natural. I'm not arguing right or wrong. Just discussing the complex nuance
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:10 PM
1

Sperm only survives 5 days in the testes. Masturbation removes dead sperm and relieves stress. There is evidence frequent orgasms can reduce prostate cancer. Our biology does not encourage us to surpress our sex organs. Nature is encouraging us to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:02 PM
1

Is there a red pill hand book? The reason I ask are the red pillers I've listened to focus on a woman's body count and their ability to pair bond. If you are telling me that's not really RP I'm not saying you are wrong but I find it hard to believe every red pillers Ive stumbled across focuses on this virgin pair bonding topic. The life long monogomous species of animals who pair bond for life literally are not attracted to anyone else but their one mate. That's not a belief that's just observat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 10:58 AM
1

So you don't and have never masturbated? You seem to say the difference between us and animals is that we can surpress our biological drive to have sex. . I look at all of human history in every society and I simply don't see that ever happening. Either virginity is sacred which leads to marriage much earlier or virginity is not sacred and humans start having non-marital sex around the same time. I'm not counting asexuals and eunuchs who were always in the minority. I'm also not counting preists…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 10:48 AM
1

Up until a hundred years ago lifelong monogomy per defined by the Christian Judean tradition was the highest standard of marriage. In the pay 60 years the definition has shifted to unlimited sex partners prior to the wedding ceremony and then a sudden expectation to shift to life long monogomy post ceremony. There isn't really a clear definition today. Outside of legal protection, tax benefits, and the ceremony there isn't much difference between a modern LTR amd marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:22 AM
3

Thanks for this info. I need to get familiar with the Black Pill movement. Seems like I may have blurred lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:20 PM
1

Got it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 08:32 PM
1

Low n-count? Is that body count? Is there science behind this? I haven't been able to find much which makes me think folks are just spouting opinion. I've only found one study through the university of Utah and it showed those with 0-1 previous sex partners were the happiest. 3 previous partners were the second happiest. 6-10 were the least happiest. After 10 the numbers went up. The study didn't go into how many sexual encounters each person had. So it didn't say if it was one sex partner a tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 08:10 PM
2

You obviously have a right to your preference. I see guys throw out these numbers and they seem to have no rhyme or reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 06:28 PM
2

So you don't believe a life long monogomous pair bond is impacted by two previous sex partners? But it's compromised by three? What if she had sex with 2 guys 1,000 times? How would she compare against a woman who had 3 bodies but had sex 5 times total?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:57 PM
1

The mother bonds with both children that's true. But her bond with the first child isn't broken when the second child is born. It's also life long. It seems reasonable a bond with a mate your human biology is reproducing with would benefit from a strong bond and produce an evolutionary benefit. I agree bonding can occur with others but I'm on the fence regarding if a bond can be diluted after bonding with so many previous partners. I'm talking both men and women. Historically and prior to birth …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:48 PM
6

So are you saying on average TRP crowd is seeking marriage in high school? I'm not seeing that but maybe I don't know red Pill. I don't know a single person who desired or tried to get married in high school or college (both sexes). If that's not happening I'm calling BS. Is red Pill trying to push for a culture of marriage at 18 becoming the norm or at least more common?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:41 PM
1

The hormones (valsopressin and oxytocin) are real and release during sex. Also applicable for friendship and child bonding. Obviously, however, folks can have sex with others so it's Definitely not the same lifelong monogomous pair bond we see in other species. But to ignore any bonding hormones as non impactful seems unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:33 PM
2

You haven't heard about premarital sex destroying the ability to pair bond with a future spouse?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:18 PM
1

Almost all men recognize how the pill (removing the risk of pregnancy) has opened up a lot more opportunity for women to sleep around without that risk. It's a shame that folks are starting to deny bonding hormones, STD risks, and even their biological clock in exchange for feel good sexual morality opinions. I've seen women deny that the oxytocin released during breast feeding reinforces a permanent mother and child bond. Once it gets that out of hand (denying mother child bonding) it will be d…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 08:22 PM
1

Ah the IFS conservative "think tank". Just one study from them. I won't dismiss it but if I have time I'll see if I can find more studies. I'll also dig into the sample set and criteria of this study. My current view unless we go back to marrying at 15-18 years old things will remain as is within western society. No society in history has successfully been able to supress human sex hormones much past puberty without early marriage or artificial hormone blockers and birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 07:18 PM
1

Any stats on this or is this the usual pull stats out of thin air and "trust me bro" via reddit "research".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 06:07 PM
1

Both men and women release bonding hormones. The amounts vary greatly from person to person. Men produce valsopressin and women oxytocin. Although men can also produce oxytocin the amount is generally lower. Some people release a lot of bonding hormones. This is the reason some become stalkers or extremely clingy even without sex. Bonding forms in friendships as well not just with sexual partners. There are also folks who release very little bonding hormones, can be asexual, or simply not monoga…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter