| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | UK: Green peer calls for ALL MEN to face 6pm CURFEW in wake of Sarah Everard murderThat's not a curfew. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/21 09:37 AM |
| 61 | UK: Green peer calls for ALL MEN to face 6pm CURFEW in wake of Sarah Everard murderSurely a curfew on women would achieve the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/21 01:59 PM |
| 1 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.People get judged at their workplace all the time for their actions outside work. You might get judged at work for being gay but you can't be fired for it. No is forcing anyone to hire sex offenders. In fact I don't really think being a sex offender is an "opinion" anyway. Who knew! Now you obviously see it as your place to "regulate behaviour" by attacking people's livelihood but most of us are happy enough to just use criticism and argument to do so. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 03:50 PM |
| 1 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.Well no, of course you can not, it would not hold in court. Why wouldn't it? I'll tell you why not. It's because "jeopardize the company status" isn't a legal standard. It's just some vague nonsense you made up. Criticism and dislike do extend to action such as avoidance See now we're getting somewhere. Criticism and dislike probably "extend" to all sorts of things like firing people from their jobs. If that's what you think then just say it. Imagine the situation where a black business owner is… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 03:47 PM |
| 2 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.I DO want employers to have the right not to employ people whose public statements and behavior jeopardize the company status. That is controlling people's opinions and belief because what "jeopardizes the company status" is completely subjective. You could make up any old nonsense and claim that it was doing that. "This man's deviant sexual proclivities jeopardize the company status!" See? You can claim almost anything is doing that. Having free pass on opinions or "only god can judge me" appro… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 02:27 PM |
| 5 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.No, not owed That was how you framed it. The simple fact is that you think that if a person does something their employer doesn't like but they can't be fired for it then they are "owed". its clearly case of discrimination of protected class And guess what making beliefs and opinions a protected class would do........ Exactly the same thing. You want employers to control people's beliefs and opinions. I don't agree. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 12:59 PM |
| 3 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.That's exactly what I'm proposing. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 12:48 PM |
| 3 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.You think employers should have the right to control their employees lives outside of work? What if they're gay and you don't like what they do in their personal lives. Oh dear. Sexuality is a protected class. So you see you some people are "owed". | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 12:43 PM |
| 1 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.there are virtually no protections for employees in a situation like this So add them in. It's not hard. We have numerous protected classes that protect people from mobs of faceless trolls. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 12:35 PM |
| 11 | It's not realy MRA but it is sad to see people no longer understanding what free speech means.There's a new element to this though. No one really minds getting criticism for what you say. It's internet mobs threatening companies images unless they fire employees who have gone against the group think. These might be very low level employees. It's absolutely not companies firing these people just because they feel like it. They're being threatened. There's a kind of a semantic exercise going on here. If the government had the power to get people fired because of something they said then it… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 10:50 AM |
| 1 | BrilliantHe's also on Joe Rogan 1006 and Joe Rogan 958 which, unfortunately are gaps of 48 and 64. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 20/02/21 02:57 PM |
| 19 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.If they feel that way...... then what are they doing in gender neutral bathrooms? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 05:34 PM |
| 13 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Fuck 'em. If my gender makes people uncomfortable what does that say about them? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 05:11 PM |
| 108 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Nah. They were all quite big bathrooms. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 08:15 AM |
| 428 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Something very similar happened at a university I worked at. They had a mens, ladies and gender neutral bathroom but they had loads of complaints about men using the gender neutral bathroom. I always used the gender neutral bathroom as a point of principle. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 07:02 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter