TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AllenJacoby Archive

View 5 posts and 51 comments by AllenJacoby on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

I agree that it's bullshit, and unfair, but it doesn't mean we should stoop to it. One defeats the Devil by staying out of Hell.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:21 PM
-5

Don't stoop to the level of the self-deluded and the bitter.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:49 PM
-5

When you're discussing gender-issues, don't use gendered insults. And don't belittle arguments with bullshit pathos and internet rage, and make us all look like misogynists.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:21 PM
20

Copy editors. Damn them all.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:19 PM
-16

The fact that this comment got so many upvotes is why I'm occasionally ashamed to be a part of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:56 PM
48

"You have got me." Do people talk like that?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:56 PM
14

Like Switzerland! Where everyone owns assault rifles but no one shoots up schools.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 12:34 AM
11

Except pretty much everything I've ever read or seen from Watson has been whiny and awful.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:52 AM
1

Yes. It exists if neither are attracted to one another...? I can cite several. What comes to mind is friendships where people DO get attracted to one another, because those stand out in our mind over healthy friendships.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:06 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Are you assuming that men and women are only friends because they're sexually attracted to one another?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:39 PM
1

When you say what you just said, can I infer that you lack reading comprehension?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:10 PM
3

They do the same thing with the word "Troll" or "Trolling." Trolling means to subtly (or unsubtly) post an opinion / fact the opposite of yours / the truth for teh lulz or to make others look stupid. Simply disagreeing with someone or derailing or being a jerk isn't Trolling. I don't know why, but the tendency of Feminist and MRA bloggers to misuse the word really upsets me.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:52 PM
4

I think this denial of the friendzone thing comes from an incorrect assumption of what the "friendzone" is. Current Feminist Definition of Friendzone: Due to male entitlement, a man believes that women owe him sex, and so he performs deeds to get her to fuck him, and then calls her a friend-zoning bitch when she doesn't. Actual Definition of Friendzone: One person falls in love with / has a crush on a friend, and that friend, either out of wicked manipulation or an inability to be frank about th…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:50 PM
-2

The story was just all around sad. I feel bad for her. I feel bad for him. It's just a shitty mess all around.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:24 PM
2

I've seen my fair share of shit I didn't like from MRAs. Same from SRS's. But this...this reaction. It's the illogical, uncontrollable reaction of associating "us" as the enemy. Totally dehumanized.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:14 AM
102

This kind of hatred genuinely scares me. Like, even if half of things SRS believed about us were true (misogyny, whatever), we have NEVER exhibited this sort of rage. This sort of violence. It's frightening.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:34 PM
2

You're so great. (Totally irrelevant but I've never seen you on here before.)
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:30 PM
5

How can you be here? This is an iPad!
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:40 AM
6

We are what we claim to hate.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 12:37 AM
1

I got downvoted a LOT for saying this in the original thread: I'm firmly against the death penalty, and I'm DEFINITELY against vigilantism resulting in deaths. 1 Human being doesn't have the right to say that any other human dies.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:37 AM
2

The comments section is full of hate for the graph. Just saying.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:20 AM
2

TwoXChromosomes sided with you guys on this one. http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/166s7g/amanda_marcotte_the_saddest_graph_youll_see_today/
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:43 AM
1

In a way, she inadvertently confirms that men are just as victimized by gender roles as women. Absurdist expectations for men leads to depression and other mental problems in those men who already had psychotic tendencies, and then the whole "blaze of glory" thing.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:08 AM
5

This article is good and you should feel good.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:53 AM
12

I think the people she's talking about certainly exist. There's no denying that. But I've been lurking in this subreddit for months now, watching you guys, and from where I've stood...you AREN'T those people. You're egalitarians. You want men and women to be treated equally without sensationalist or polarizing rhetoric. But if that is what you really want, then you simply have to keep showing that. Prove her wrong.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:58 PM
17

I don't think so. The topvoted comment on that thread (with 500 upvotes) agreed that "SRS is to feminism as the Inquisition is to Christianity." I think there are just a few butthurt SRS members IN /r/feminism that act as a vocal minority.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:19 AM
2

Frankly, if there wasn't the whole "gender-reversal" backlash, this shouldn't be an issue. A company should be perfectly allowed to make a product only for women, or a product only for men, if that's what the company wants to do.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:21 PM
-1

It's "Whose Line" Drew Carey.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:17 AM
14

Oh definitely. I agree with you. I just wanted to point out that I don't think the poster intended to be the sort of sexist that most of the commenters here believe.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:58 AM
-5

http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Drew_Carey.jpg
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:43 AM
63

I was under the impression that this person is supporting trans individuals, by mocking those who are critical of men who dress as women.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:48 PM
2

Well, we had our weekly tear-up meeting last night. Only one person showed up to complain, and that was the guy in charge of that CHAMPS group. He picked a little bit of a fight with me, and, understandably, was peeved. Not that I ever said his organization was bad, however; just poorly named. Although, he started giving me a lecture on feminism, and seemed wholly unaware that this is an opinion article, and the writer is allowed to think that Feminism isn't the most effective option. That's why…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:10 PM
1

The satire there is caricature of the hostility many "modern" atheists display towards theists. Just take a walk on over to /r/atheism if you don't believe me. It's supposed to be totally over the top extremist satire, as its paired with the OTHER Snark v. Snark about how religion is harmless and the best thing ever.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:04 PM
6

First negative comment was just posted, but note: Not hostile. Polite. Discourse is necessary, gang!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:48 AM
6

professional journalist Wow, thanks, that means a lot!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:57 AM
3

Thanks Tucker! This is one of our snarkier writers. He publishes a lot of satire and snark pieces, so his tone tends to bleed through. I think he intended to start this as a more lighthearted piece. Also, to those of you fearing "tars and featherings" you'd be surprised. UCI is often a very understanding campus. My fellow Opinion Editor is a very dedicated feminist; she praised him for writing this piece, and the rest of the staff and I will stand by him if there are any and all threats.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:53 AM
7

I agree.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:05 AM
14

Thank you so much guys! And no hate mail yet, either! The author wants me to inform you that he's incredibly thankful for all your support. He's got a few other "MRA" themed articles in mind. He wants to stress that he doesn't necessarily side with MRA or Feminism - he calls himself an egalitarian, but he and I are both pretty sick of MRAs getting a bum rap!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:14 AM
3

Oh, I'm certain. This was less about your particular case and more about making a slight point for SOME behavior/emotional distress of stay-at-home spouses.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:46 PM
5

Not at all to defend her behavior, and this is NOT an asinine "hurr durr privelage patriarchy gender roles" thing, but that life can really, honestly, suck. Stay at home spouses, especially someone with previous emotional problems, go stir crazy. Their lives seem devoid of meaning, empty, valueless. Etc. So I get why people in that situation feel emotionally messed up. But again, unbelievable what she did to you.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:27 PM
-4

Bill Maher's kind of a dick. I wouldn't be too surprised if parts of what she said were true. Or she's crazy. Who knows.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:56 PM
4

I've been single for 3 years, and happy. A few months ago, a female friend and I started dating, and one thing led to another. Shit started getting serious (emotionally, not physically), and she said we were dating. A few days later, she dropped it. No reasoning, just, "Hey, we're through." I had a tough time; I didn't have time to process, and it emotionally crippled me. When I tried to explain this to her later, she said, "The way I see it, we hooked up a couple times, but things didn't work o…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:26 AM
2

This should have more upvotes.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:46 PM
0

You're no twit, sir. That is a rapier wit
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:38 PM
2

To which the fempire would respond: "You used your male privilege to employ violence against others and cisgenderedly encourage masculinity." God, I hate all that neopolitical jargon.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:27 PM
2

ditto.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:39 AM
3

I feel like if I get angry I'm a privileged/racist/sexist/homophobe/asshole... But I'm angry. And annoyed. And egalitarian.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:55 AM
2

I 100% agree with angryletterwriter. There's a serious danger for people who have very little experience with r/MR and Violentacrez, like myself, and even more so people with a determined confirmation bias to see us as anti-woman sexists, to misread r/MR 's stance on the guy. I personally want nothing to do with /r/Creepshots or him...
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:07 PM
2

Every comment by "Bracula" in that article just plain pissed me off. I won't pretend to be the most PC person around - and I don't want to be, it's enough for me to do my best to be egalitarian and treat others, regardless of creed or race, the way I would like to be treated - and the extremity and absurdity of Bracula's tones was just unnecessary.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:00 PM
1

Ah, I see. Well, it wouldn't be the first time. It seems the "fempire" is all about removing the barrier between humor/fiction and genuine perpetrators. Of course, they'll never touch /b/.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:37 PM
2

I'm relatively new to r/MR, so when I first heard that Violentacrez (who from what little I know appears to be a pedophile, I could very well be wrong) was taken down, I was sort of okay with it. Then I took a trip down to the subreddit. "Glory to the fempire" and banning users for making Chris Hansen jokes? PC run amok, I say. The difference between us and the "fempire," it would seem, is that we are genuinely egalitarian...whereas they see this as some strange quest for vengeance justified by …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter