TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Alleyria Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by Alleyria on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
53

Not talking about the child/adult wage gap is the real crime.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:47 AM
7

I remember when I was growing up that some things I could talk with Mom about better, some things I could talk with Dad about better - and sometimes it was with confidence. If you think this boy is in danger, then of course his father should know, but from the sound of it he was just hanging out with a little dumbsh*t and cut that tie. If you think he's safe, then I don't see why you need to betray that confidence.
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/18 06:03 PM
5

I mean, that's a sensationalist trash rag. Got anything better?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:06 AM
-9

It's not a trial and there is no "due process". It's a job interview, and it really seems like he might have done it.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 07:43 PM
-16

Well, according to the US Judicial Code of Conduct, a judge is supposed to: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all Activities (http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges) So, there is actually an emotional standard he's being held to, and that - in my opinion - he fell short of. This isn't a trial, this is a job interview, and he behaved poorly. Making recipro…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/18 08:45 AM
-1

Yea, they do, but in her case it seems legit. Just use your head, man. She's got a paper trail that goes back six years, and she's putting her family through the wringer to do this.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:21 PM
-1

Hmm, no, I think it's pretty established. Even the GOP isn't arguing that it didn't happen. At most, it might have been someone else (to them). With the American BAR association, Yale Law, and the magazine of the Jesuit religious order in the United States all calling for further investigation and dropping support, I think it's safe to say that *something* happened.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:13 PM
-1

Right, because they are far less important then the identity of her rapist.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:40 PM
-2

The most important detail - the identity of her assailant - is really all I care about. That's the kind of detail that gets burned into memory, while less important details will fade.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:02 AM
1

Ford starting talking about this in 2012 with her therapist. That's documented. Kav's college roomate has said Kav drank a *lot* ​ So, there's two.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:56 AM
35

Let's not make Kav the hill we die on. This dude has some credible allegations that *should* bring pause to this job interview. I know false accusations are an issue, but for god sakes, get off the trump train and use your head. He'd be a bad judge. The only reason trump nominated him are Kav's views on exectuive power.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:25 PM
37

Sure they are - coroborated stories from multiple sources that show he has a problem with alcohol. Hell, his college roommate said he had a problem.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:22 PM
0

Let's see if they turn out to be false. Thats the point of an investigtion. As of right now I consider it plausable.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:16 AM
0

lol I was making a joke. Chill.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:15 AM
-4

Buddy, you gotta watch something other than fox. Just off the top of my head: The GOP gerrymandered house districts following the 2010 census to give themselves a distinct advantage in house elections Mitch McConnell didn't have a hearing for Merrick Garland's supreme court nomination because "it was an election year" - something that has zero precedent. Trump lost the popular vote. ​
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:11 PM
-3

Well, no, they haven't. I'll direct your attention to the lack of a rape allegation during Gorsuch's hearings. The nomination of Kav is a purely political move, so I don't know why one would expect any difference in the response.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:16 PM
-1

Eh, you were dressed like a tramp. Obviously asking for it. Dumb points aside, Dr. Ford did put her name behind her claim. Just check out what happened to Anita Hill in 1991 when she was testifying. I would pose that Ford's request for investigation is to lend credibility and avoid a circus similar to 1991.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:52 PM
-3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2MeJYPL_ow&t=13s
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:45 PM
-3

I don't think I disagree with your premise: this is a delay tactic. It's just that I'm quite alright with it because I think he's unfit to serve, and, of course, the Garland thing. As to what an FBI investigation could turn up 35 years later... Corroborating stories of Kav's attendance, her reasons for fabrication, the quality of the supporting evidence...Any number of things. As I said above, if he's innocent, this should exonerate him. That being said, Ford does have corrobrating notes from he…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:43 PM
2

Right. See Anita Hill's treatment in 1991 during C.Thomas' hearings.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:32 PM
0

Hey, if he's innocent, there's no problem with an investigation. If he's guilty, he shouldn't have a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. Also, he's already purjured himself during the senate hearing, I have no idea why anyone would stick up for him at this point. This isn't a "mens rights" issue, this is a "shit judge" issue, with a side of alledged attempted rape. Also also, this only reason this is being rushed is the GOP is worried they're going to lose control of the house…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:32 PM
1

You're wrong about how superdelegates work: their vote only matters between a particular margin. Meaning: If you have 42.8% of regular delegates, you need 100% of super-D's to get the nomination. If you have 58.2% of regular delegates (or greater...duh) you need 0% of the super-D's to get the nomination. Adding to that, Sanders only needs 53.1% of the remaining delegates to get the nomination.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 01:46 AM
41

Your dick evolved in such a way as to actively remove competition/sperm, a trait that would only have been advantageous if it was a) successful and b) necessary.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 08:32 PM
7

A straw man is when you construct your opponents arguments :: "Alphas," as I understand it, view women as objects to be controlled and used to meet the Alpha's own needs Which isn't true, but is easy to argue against. Hence, strawman argument.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/15 01:07 AM
1

Of course not. People are still accountable, but that's not the point of this. Your actions have no bearing over them, so why waste the time thinking about how they are 'bad' - it just doesn't matter. Move on.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/15 02:03 AM
5

Think of it this way. When you justify someone's actions in a way that makes you powerless, that's playing the victim, and you cannot grow from that. However, saying that you were in a situation of your own creation and the way to prevent it in the future is through personal growth focuses on what you do have power over: yourself. At the end you are left with positive changes you have made. Yes, the situation likely had more nuance than that, but the side that you have no power over doesn't matt…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/15 12:58 AM
2

I just don't care. Girls can have their gym, or use mine. Regardless, I'll be ignoring them because I go there to work. It's only when the coed gym suffers because of one gender's preference of tools (weights for guys, mats for girls) where this becomes and issue. My gym is great, guys and girls welcome, and I've had no problems what so ever.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:25 PM
1

You didn't have to, but think about it this way: your 7 year old decides to throw a fit at you and storms off, coming back every now and then to see if they can provoke you. You ignore all that, no sense getting pissed off at a child and losing your shit. Later they come and ask for a snack. Do you withhold the snack from them? Bringing this back, you're not rewarding her with the wifi password and you're not punishing her by withholding it. That's the game she is playing, and you're better than…
/r/askTRP24/10/15 11:33 PM
0

I think you did fine. You said you were going out, and you did. She threw a little fit and you ignored it. She's testing to see if you cave to her withholding affection. Just don't cave, and given a short amount of time she will look silly and realize that it's not working, and give up. And then you've won.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 11:20 PM
8

Having the mantra of 'don't get married' is reactionary, not idealistic. The fact that women wind up used and bitter at 30, single or settled, is tragic. That men have no space to call their own, no good models to look to for real advice, and are constantly demonized is unacceptable. But that's where we are.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 10:37 PM
2

Look at what straight guys use for attraction: attitude, charm, social skills, dominance. These are all attractive qualities to women, hence, a woman trying to attract women will embody these. And what do straight girls use to attract men? Their looks. Men are far more visually oriented in their attraction, so guys who want to pick up guys look good to attract guys.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 03:47 AM
3

http://www.divorcecorp.com/the-film/ This is a great documentary on the institution of divorce in the US. Well worth a watch.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 08:41 PM
24

It's really interesting to look at the rhetoric here. What you've done is hold a man to a woman's standards and examine how he falls short. It would be like observing how men at 18 can do far more pull-ups than women and commenting on how less physically developed women are. Or to look at it another way: the female prerogative is to lock down a mate. The male prerogative is to spread offspring around. It therefore follows that girls will be far more inclined to have a 'serious relationship' than…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:18 PM
5

I've always appreciated a woman that has complimentary skill sets. For example, I work on my car, my bike, build furniture, and a ton of other things. However, I can't sew beyond putting a patch on a jacket, and though my cooking skills are adequate, they leave a lot to be desired. If a girl can bring those skills that I lack to a relationship, she is adding a good deal of value. Will that value outweigh her age? Not necessarily. A 20 year old with limited skills can learn to cook/sew/etc. A 30 …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 08:46 PM
1

I've always thought this was interesting. It shows the differences in mate-selection preference between men and women: Men, being more visually oriented, dress sharply and keep in good shape to be visually hot. Women are not as visually stimulated, so it becomes less of a priority in favor of other methods like attitude and perceived toughness.
/r/askTRP07/02/15 07:59 PM
19

I've found that volunteering with something you're passionate about is a great way to meet people.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 07:35 AM
2

In short: yes. Not as short: Thats a term for people who come here and post things like "I'm concerned about...". In your case, that would be casual misogyny. You might not be here to troll, and my advice is to hang out a while longer, read everything you can (sidebar.), and suppress the urge to voice your concerns until you have a more thoughtful argument.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 12:40 AM
3

Well, this response video is to a street harassment video that has the same intention as the recent one; display how evil the men are for noticing a pretty girl and daring to say something.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 07:47 PM
11

I recall reading on this sub a while back that there are no inherently 'female' occupations or hobbies: Cats: See Schrodinger in his hardcore cat ownership. Photographers: Most of the very best artists are men, inventors of the technology, etc. Cooking: The best chefs are men Sewing/Tailors/Fashion Designers: The best ones are men. Cleaning: Who do you think invented the washing machine, or cleaning chemicals and tools. A woman would say "I'll do the best with the tools I have", a man says, "Thi…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:10 PM
2

I've read this exact story before. Go troll elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 11:16 AM
6

Yep, this is some copypasta.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 11:14 AM
9

You're a bit off with your statements on Yoko Ono; she was an accomplished artist in her own right. Her exhibits were attracting the likes of Marcel Duchamp and Peggy Guggenheim in 1960; 6 years before she met, and 9 before she married Lennon. She also began doing conceptual/performative pieces before she met him, notably 'Cut Piece' in 1964. Did it help her to marry a Beatle? Of course it did. But she had a successful career before they met.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 11:18 AM
4

How is that a good reason? You're sensationalizing news.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 10:42 AM
0

Pretty sure you meant 'Turn a blind eye' or 'Turn the other cheek'
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 11:50 AM
1

Yea, not really a question on this one.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 09:13 AM
30

Take that evolution!
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 07:16 PM
2

Yes.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 11:47 PM
2

Fun fact: ulcers are not caused by stress, but by bacteria.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 10:38 PM
2

Nah, man, you gotta check the Prestige Series - $300 tops.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 07:04 AM
3

http://www.gradolabs.com/ You will not be disappointed.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 11:33 PM
17

It's negging.
/r/askTRP31/10/13 04:42 PM
2

Ha! ...what?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 07:49 AM
5

If she has any questions, r/askTRP is the place for that. :)
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 09:41 AM
4

I was joking with my flatmate about this last night! Dealing with girlfriend (his) drama. Man, if it was a choice, I'd make it in a second.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:30 AM
3

I found this to be a great first step. https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/videos?flow=grid&view=0&sort=p
/r/askTRP05/09/13 09:57 PM
1

I found this to be a great first step. https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/videos?flow=grid&view=0&sort=p
/r/askTRP05/09/13 09:54 PM
9

They have a right to voice their mind though. As long as policy is legislated that affects them, they should have some say in it.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 07:31 PM
2

Friend of mine used the cup, loved it.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter