TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlmostRedPill Archive

View 4 posts and 53 comments by AlmostRedPill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

But there are many good male writers. There are almost none female ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 12:54 AM
1

You basically proved most of my points. The only reason to care, is because women are holding men back. They should be ignored and disparaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 12:22 AM
-1

Of course you can - if you are beta bucks, that is!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 12:02 AM
0

That's pretty much Battered Wife syndrome in a nutshell. "Yeah, they're not that good, but we have to live with them, I guess!"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:53 PM
-1

These days, women only have advantages vs men in virtually all fields in the western world. Yet they barely have made any progress. True, but that are many, many, many more males that do those things better than even thse women can do. On average, women just don't deserve it. If one comes by, so be it. but that is the exception, not the rule. The last paragraph sounds like it was written by a feminist. "Just be okay with not having sex and dying alone! What's the big deal?"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:21 PM
-3

"No True Scottsman" fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:13 PM
0

Yet you have no responses to my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:12 PM
-1

Not everyone can be in the 20%. Hence why its called the 20%. Your defense of females is so limp-wristed, you could have wrote it in your sleep. While it is better to focus on yourself over hating women, there is still no reason to respect women unless you are REALLY fucking thirsty.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 11:05 PM
0

But it indicates a general trend. Its evidence, while feminists have nothing to counter it. And as someone who is in the bottom 80%, I can tell you, most men are in this bracket are not sought after by girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 10:52 PM
0

Of course they are - because they are seeking their beta buxx. Those top 20% is what they would fuck on the first date. The bottom 80% gets the girls who already "got it out of their system". AKA post-wall sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 10:51 PM
-2

Yet they still rake in millions! Because of women, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 10:46 PM
0

Not particularly impressed by a one-hit wonder, a perpetual victim, and a psychopath. But even if those four were great, the fact remains - men are better authors than women. All of literary canon proves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 10:36 PM
-2

citation needed
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:23 PM
0

If course they get sex...after western women actually pass the wall. And remember, not every woman can have that juicy 20% Alpha Fuxx.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:18 PM
-4

Of course, you would have no sympathy. Sympathy is a social construct designed by the heteropatriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 10:30 PM
-2

And most men do not. That's one of the fundamental differences. Rape by men = last ditch effort to experience intimacy in our feminist society. Rape by women = attention whore gone to extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 10:21 PM
-11

Of course not. And biologically, women are ok with rape. It is only because of sociology that they are against it. You never seen an animal mortified because it was raped, have you? An actual alpha wouldn't be married in the first place. Congratulations, you're the BetaBuxx.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 10:20 PM
-5

Still not a majority. Regardless, the 80-20 rule doesn't apply for men. Women have plenty of other options.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 10:06 PM
-4

When they are the rapists, I'd imagine. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:57 PM
-9

That's like saying want to be a millionaire fantasy =/= want to be a millionaire. Everyone wants to their fantasies to become reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:55 PM
-4

Rape should not be a crime. Men should only take responsibility in the sense that their partner may not like them for raping them. There is no way to guranntee you won't be raped, but it should be the woman's responsibility to reduce her chances, if she's not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:53 PM
-11

But nobody wants theft, plus theft causes actual damage. Rape does not, and is a common fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:50 PM
-4

That still proves female hypergamy. If women are only interested in 20% of men, the other 80% is simply fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:48 PM
-5

There is no evidence that legalizing rape would destroy civilization. You are just grasping at straws. Its like saying "If more people went outside, the world would be destroyed, because disease would be more likely to spread!" Its typical blue pill fearmongering.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:42 PM
-17

Not all men can afford prostitution. Rape, however, is free. Rape is only assault because feminists have taught women to fight back against their "attackers" (emphasis on quotation marks). If women were taught to take it, as animals and humans do in nature, they would be unharmed. If you struggle during a rape, the only person to blame is yourself. No decent man would want to deal with the emotional batshit and the knowledge that somebody else's dick was inside her. Sorry if the truth is misogyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:26 PM
-9

You honestly believe that anti-rape laws have existed in every society? Lawls. Female on male rape would be justified, if women were like men. But men don't have rape fantasies, aren't naturally raped, and do not follow the 80/20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:20 PM
-4

If STDs were going to destroy humanity, they already would have. STDs aren't only spread by rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:13 PM
-5

You could get an STD from any douche you have sex with. You could get an STD from sharing a needle. If you want to stay inside to minimalize being raped, that's your lifestyle. If you don't want to be raped, but want to go outside, then stop wearing slutty clothes or hanging out with assholes. Its this little thing most feminist women have never head of: "responsibility".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:11 PM
-5

Would you ban going outside if there was an ebola outbreak? Go back to r/MLPlounge
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:03 PM
-4

Emphasis on "potential". Rape injuries could also be reduced if women were taught to be more gentle during rape. Also, blaming rape for stds is like blaming coughs for the common cold. Its not their fault. Also, abortion ends unplanned pregnancies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 09:01 PM
-8

Men and women are different. Men do not have rape fantasies. Men do not find only 20% of women attractive. Men are valuable, productive members of society. This is why male prison rape is ignored as a social issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 08:55 PM
-2

No every instance of rape results in an STD. Besides, you wouldn't arrest someone for spreading the common cold, would you? Its just a fact of life...until feminists decided women deserved "rights" (without any of the responsibility, of course).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 08:54 PM
-2

The real issue is she was underaged. If she were, say, 21, she probably would have been more or less alright. But if she was still hurt, it should classify assult. Rape without any injuries is like arresting someone who hugged you to hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 08:51 PM
1

I'll take that as a reminder. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 02:45 AM
3

Feminism is against gender roles. But humans can't go beyond them. Thus, while women are still attracted to hypermasculine men, feminism tells them that's just a "social construct". It leads to both men and women entering unsatisfying relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 02:20 AM
4

But its evidence. Feminism has nothing. Just empty platitudes that have been failing poor beta males for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 02:04 AM
2

I don't believe in censoring my language. AF:BB is a legitimate strategy, supported by science. And more and more beta men are finding themselves with used goods. Considering women's preference for those who have power, are strong, confident, masculine, distant, and dominant - all traits I don't naturallly possess - I'm not particularly interested in forming a LTR. Maybe fuck once in awhile, but its mostly for the self-esteem I'm considering the philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:48 AM
2

Of course. But if a woman has the body of a playmate, and the femininity of a 50s Christian wife? She'd be a dream girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:34 AM
6

We can't make assumptions on averages based on groups. Well, no wonder why feminists can't give good dating advice. NAWALT may be true, but its useless when it comes to game. If the majority of women want to be dominated, you will be much more successful if you act dominant than if you don't, even if a few women will be "offended".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:09 AM
5

As an actual male, I don't know a guy who wouldn't want to marry a Playboy model. And their traits are often desired in a partner. But you can't admit that a large, perhaps a majority, of female love dominance in and out of the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:06 AM
4

Women objectify men as much as men objectify women. Many relationships have been destroyed because men have become too sensitive - I.E., be themselves. The toxicity is only because of these frustration and because we have been told to be "good guys" all our life. Movies, music, games, biking, swimming. Unfortunately, unless you're Chad Thundercock, these are as interesting as dry wall to a female.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:05 AM
6

Saying its "just fantasy" is like saying men "just like" big breasts. Most women would love to live out this fantasy. And yes, if a HB10 was willing to be a guy's Jenna Jameson, she's get a marriage proposal line that would stretch for miles. That's what men want, but when you say women want to be dominanted, you're treated like some sort of monster. Considering there's little reason to date a woman when you have low SMV, I'll take being a sex object. Pump x Dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:53 AM
5

Unfortunately, that is usually not enough. Of course it would seem simple to a female, who always has the attention of the opposite sex at her side. Unless you are buff, athletic, and like outdoors stuff, interest really doesn't mean shit. Edward Cullen and Christian Grey have 0 interest between the two, but have made millions of women fantasize about them. Why do you think that's true?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:42 AM
6

Its not like I don't have hobbies. But women are generally not interested in me. Being smart, caring, and attentive only works if you're already an alpha male and someone is showing interest in you. Otherwise, it is a one-way ticket to the friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:38 AM
10

I'm not special. But if it weren't for r/theredpill, society would have kept on telling me that the closest way to a girl's heard is a bouquet of flowers and a night of fine dining.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:27 AM
3

You seem like you'd take the blue pill just to prove a point. Sorry bro, but just because you want the world to be different doesn't mean its worth dying alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:19 AM
9

All the more reason to support the r/theredpill. It may be flawed, but the general message is sound and ignored by mainstream society. I'm fine if its not fair. Just don't be surprised when me, and other men, are no longer interested in LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:16 AM
8

No. But being a distant, minimally caring, dominant is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:12 AM
1

Distance, success, status, and outright confrontation (being an "asshole") all are attractive traits of men to women. Feminists would like to believe that women aren't that shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 08:41 PM
15

While there was the same amount of messaging, this completely falls in line with AF;BB philosophy: women can settle with a provider, but its the alphas they truly desire. If they have problems with relationships, its because of their own faults, either lack of confidence, social skills, or game. I have never seen feminism care about male issues unless cornered. They are more likely to laugh at them. (Male circumcision? LOL!) I've been with the opposite sex before. Nobody has ever shown interest …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 08:40 PM
11

99% of the time, feminism concentrates on how these gender roles hurt women. They don't, and have never given a shit, about men. Notice that when men wonder why they aren't having success despite being kind and caring, feminists are the first to slice their throat for daring to have an opinion. For a sub about making fun of it, r/thebluepill seems to be pretty fucking miserable, as if they're forced to read and get angry over r/theredpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 07:44 PM
6

Funny, most of what TheRedPill touts actually seems to be self-improvement. While its philosophy may be incorrect, it has been true throughout history that strong, domineering males attract more women - "Nice guys finish last" is a phrase which exists for a reason. I'd love to be thoughtful, cooperative, and empathetic. But if I do, I'll probably die alone or with the lowest value women who needs someone to settle with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:35 PM
1

I mean, I didn't understand female attraction, and always believed in "true love"...until I realized how unsuccessful I was and started reading what actually attracts women. Now, hypergamy seems surprisingly logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter