TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Alopixgg Archive

View 3 posts and 190 comments by Alopixgg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The numbers I've seen say immigrants are more likely to be victims of domestic violence. This was in the US I believe, but the reasons are pretty easy to guess and, I imagine, fairly universal. Based on your username and comment I assume you're in favor of catching and locking up or deporting immigrants involved in violent crime, and helping the ones that aren't escape that part of their culture and integrate. Programs like this are fundamental to that. So with that out of the way, all that's le…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:39 PM
–

Not so much. Feminism isn't the enemy. Postmodernism is. Never forget that.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:27 PM
–

You're right that calling it racist is sensationalist and untrue. However. They have their own flags now, but we're still putting them under our thumb. The developed world uses the IMF et al to manipulate their laws and governments, mines their natural resources out from under them while they suffer endless war, assaults them with waves of missionaries- and, as it seems, pressures them to adopt genital mutilation using lies and shaming tactics while they suffer epidemic levels of AIDS. It's unet…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:29 PM
–

No, no, you don't get it, by "fluid" they mean "defined by us and forced on everyone"
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:06 PM
2

It's impossible that they don't see exactly what's wrong with this, unless they're just entirely incapable of empathy. To be able to say things like this, put their name on it, without the slightest hint of irony, shame or self-awareness. These people have an illness.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:31 PM
1

It's a funny thing. For a few years spellcheck gave everyone perfect spelling and at least improved grammar. And in just as short a time autocorrect has taken it from them again.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:49 PM
3

Well, IANAD but: http://www.zoll.com/medical-products/automated-external-defibrillators/faq/ Is it okay to place the electrode pads directly on a hairy chest? Electrode pads must come in direct contact with the skin. If the chest hair is so excessive as to prevent good adhesion of the electrode pad, the hair must be removed quickly. So it seem this is a legitimate concern with an AED.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:47 PM
2

I like it because he acknowledges he's a comedian, he isn't an expert on the subject matter. So he lets others do the speaking, the show is set up as him facilitating a conversation of sorts between the two sides.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:24 PM
0

Doesn't that sub have "no victim blaming" as one of their main rules? Guess that doesn't apply to men.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:13 PM
1

The couple threw a shoe at the victim before beating her with a bag
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:01 PM
4

We can only wait, as we all must wait, for the police investigation to run its course What a two-faced fuck. Unilateral action based on zero evidence when it suits him, "we have to wait for the police" when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:52 PM
15

He's not. That's exactly how conditioning works- get em' early, repeat the mantra constnatly. "Guns r bad! Only criminals need guns!" There might not be an intentional conspiracy to create that effect, but that effect is being created.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:18 AM
1

I disagree with the tone. Instead of something like "increase men's health awareness" it's "remind men to stay healthy" like we're children who need to be told to wipe our collective ass. "Remind men not to rape"
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:34 PM
4

Notice how the one person who questions it is resoundingly mocked, "We found the single guy." The implication of course that anyone who disagrees that one partner in a marriage must be submissive to the other is incapable of sustaining relationships. This is one of those things propagated every day in the media, right along with "jokes" about prison rape and portraying men as predators.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:10 AM
2

Yeah, there was an interactive cutscene after the crash where your crippled character is able to weakly crawl around the wreckage after the crash as he dies. Pretty powerful stuff that was totally wasted on COD's average audience.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:28 AM
5

You forgot the most horribly misogynistic part of all; she is set up to be rescued by a MAN which is really a metaphor intentionally placed by the developer to oppress female gamers by reinforcing traditional gender roles and female inferiority, further victimizing them by forcing them to play through the perspective of this awful cisgendered heterosexual male oppressor. And then she is violently killed, which is just put into the game to glorify violence against women. /tumblr
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:25 AM
2

Waving the red cape. Oh, here comes an attack on feminism, let's shift the definition to one that hasn't been relevant for at least 50 years. Toro! But now, I'll cite the exact power structure that was just being criticized, that I pretended doesn't exist, and tell you you are ignorant and uneducated for not embracing it. Oh, here comes the next charge! Back to pretending institutionalized third-wave feminism doesn't exist, everything goes back to being amorphous and vague, unassailable. Then, c…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:17 AM
1

Too bad none of these facts will ever see the light of day over there. A lot of people will see wil's name on it and turn off their critical thinking(not that they were likely to have it on to begin with.)
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:17 AM
1

It's hilarious because the people who rigged the poll couldn't agree which strawman to use
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:15 AM
0

this supernatural being called govt The government is not a foreign entity. If it behaves like one, it's time for the four boxes. today whenever a problem appears, the first thought in most people's minds is "zomg what can the govt do?!?" Yes, because in society the government is the instrument of collective action. "What can the government do" is the same as "what can all of us do together using the money and resources we have pooled together." I know libertarians don't believe in collectivism …
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:05 PM
3

What, you mean by being the primary supporter of worker's rights, poverty relief, civil rights for minorities, and so on for decades, usually against intense, nearly militant conservative opposition backed by corporate funding and religious organizations? Yeah, you do mean that, because libertarians live in an alternate reality where helping people and solving society's problems is actually a bad thing because the dirty poors might forget you're better than them.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:14 AM
5

Right. They can. And we get to call them bigots for it. Simple.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:55 AM
6

In rough chronologic order; A gender-reversed critique of the content is exactly, precisely on topic- unless you want to agree that the topic is shaming men, and in fact is itself an example of prejudice against men. "what about the men!" This is a strawman argument and makes you look retarded when you use it. If calling out prejudice is "offensive", those people deserve, they need to be offended. We should go to great lengths to offend them as often and as thoroughly as possible. And finally, l…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:54 AM
0

Consider the big libertarian issues these days--war fucking over the poor, an overstretched budget fucking over the poor, too much defense spending fucking over the poor, foreign interventionalism fucking over the poor, civil rights abuses fucking over the poor
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:37 AM
1

They're getting mad about all the wrong things. Companies treat women like morons with the crap they advertise to them, especially beauty stuff. Lots of pseudoscience, lots of pretty pictures, very little fact or substance. To the point where if something is marketed to women, I typically assume it's a bad product or deceptive in some way. Why don't they get mad about THAT.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:45 AM
4

If one of them was in clear physical danger I might act, but just wandering around like they might be lost? Not even gonna look in their general direction. Fuck that in its entirety. It would be the right thing, but it's not worth it.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:37 AM
0

You disagree on definitions but agree on principle, I think. Maik never said what Anita did was right, that poster are arguing that "theft" is not the right word to describe it. The thread then devolves into an argument about piracy.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:19 PM
1

how is what Anita did not piracy? She took someone else's work and downloaded it. That's okay. That action did not affect the artist negatively at all. She then used it in a commercial work without permission and without crediting the author. That is not okay, harmed the author, and is also not in any way similar to piracy. If you think that sampling a song is worse than downloading a song, you are wrong. I didn't say that at all, there are a lot of nuances you are deliberately ignoring because …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:49 PM
1

The police were already there. Three were off-duty moonlighting as security, two others were there on an unrelated drunk and disorderly. Someone physically went and told them there was a DV in the parking lot. That person probably had no way of knowing the situation and was just acting out of concern. And, at the end of the day, that bringing in police escalates a situation is really, really unfortunate.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:15 PM
9

If someone calls and reports a DV, they show up like there's a murder taking place, because sometimes it means there is. Usually they will try and get the facts but shitty cops or states with shitty laws and they'll just jail/beat/murder the first male they see and call it a day.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:27 PM
2

An illegal download is not a lost sale except in the wacky world of the copyright lobby's made-up statistics. Piracy is not theft, it does not deprive the rightsholder of any benefit they are entitled to. What Anita did was stealing, not piracy.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:13 PM
2

These numbers are ancient. Even if they were correct when first published, and I doubt they were, they would be out of date by like 40 years.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:25 AM
3

But if they do that, then a feminist author can't screw with the data, publish a book, and then the feminist community can't cite citations of citations of citations of that book as fact.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:19 AM
1

There's only one side making it about race, and it's not the MRM. You're just bringing race into it in order to call people who disagree with you racist, and that shit doesn't work here. We're used to the same kinds of shaming rhetoric and ad hominem and thought-terminating cliche being thrown at us all the time.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 06:16 AM
1

Nobody said that. You KNOW bloody damn well nobody said that. Strawmen, insults and bad faith, that's all you've got. Take a hike.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 02:47 AM
0

Again, you are conflating my refusal to accommodate discrimination as "white rights." You're calling me a nazi because I think that people should be treated equally and do not recognize the ideology of collective privilege. You're doing nothing but throwing around strawmen arguments and trying to slander people. I'm not conflating race and gender. I'm conflating only helping some people who need it with only helping some people who need it, and advocating helping everyone who needs it. If you ha…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:34 PM
4

On one hand a government program to help boys and men is positive, but on the other hand, if it ignores half the population based on their race, it's just as problematic as a program that only seeks social justice for half the population based on their gender. It's not about race or gender. It's about equality. the issues we talk about here affect all men, there is no magic force of "privilege" preventing any individual white men from being disadvantaged, only the same kind of dice roll we all g…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:07 AM
4

Oh wow that's actually really progressive and- The data proves it: Boys and young men of color Oh. So all this does is swap gender politics for racial ones.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:36 AM
2

Yet another fantastic opportunity to post this fantastic series. http://www.dailymotion.com/BrainwashingInNorway
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:38 PM
1

I also posted the completely wrong link in the OP. so I've deleted this thread
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:39 PM
0

It was edited after they gave the same claim "mostly true" when Obama used it. currently looking for an archived version....
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:20 PM
3

By your logic, they're institutionally sexist by accusation unless they ????, where ???? is probably gender quotas or some other fake bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:47 PM
4

Anybody who defends this is just simply a subhuman piece of trash, really
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:36 PM
1

"allegedly" because they have not been convicted. They are required to phrase it that way. There isn't any evidence in the article they didn't do it, in fact it sounds like they admitted to at least parts of it, in order to use the defense that "he was a bully and he deserved it."
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:35 PM
2

Probably this.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 01:46 PM
0

The dude said their friend died and you came in spouting insults. Yes, that makes you an asshole.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 01:44 PM
1

It's not really censorship; basically we don't want to get accused of vote brigading.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:27 PM
1

So... nothing to say other than a strawman that has nothing to do with my post? Thank you for your contribution.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:07 PM
0

It's amusing you choose now to reply, after your church just put out an ad on national television shaming people for having normal sexualities and encouraging bullying.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:09 AM
2

Oh hey, the lie face. If you EVER see a woman make this face: http://i.imgur.com/6R0pfXT.png There is something fucked up or false about what she is saying, and she knows exactly why. She will talk in a higher than normal pitch, be extremely condescending, and at any hint of dissent she will immediately begin to attack the character of the person who said it. I've seen this face so many times, in so many different people. I don't know if it has a name, but it's just a giant sign on her face that…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:59 PM
0

Criticizing religion and its negative impact on the United States and on individuals, especially a religion founded by a convicted con artist, known for shady cultlike behavior and infiltration of the government, as well as being at the forefront of several efforts to ban gay marriage is not bigoted. At all.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:43 PM
1

Some good statistics, a few good points and a lot of rambling about how great religion is. I bet if you prodded the author a lot of mormon-flavored crazy would come out.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:27 PM
2

Notice it also doesn't control for anything. Not even other potential sources of discrimination such as race, age or disability.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:45 AM
1

That's uncalled for. Stop it.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:37 AM
1

If I start a business and I name my shop "the rape shack." Nobody goes to it because it has an offensive name and I go out of business. Nobody has to make a law making it illegal for me to name my shop what I want to make that happen.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 11:22 PM
1

Welp, better just hand screen ALL web sites and block anything they find objectionable. This will of course be done by an entirely secret board run by a private corporation with no regulation or oversight and a long history of douchebag behavior. Secure under the watchful eyes.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:41 PM
1

The UK has always been willing to curtail free speech in the name of decency In America, the religious right under the guise of the MPAA has been using that same bullshit to censor LGBT films for decades. That kind of bullshit is why you can show decapitated heads all you want but can't show a silhouette of a woman having an orgasm. Even the times when that same bullshit has been rebranded, variously, "for the children!" and "fighting terrorism!" and "religious freedom!" and now "protecting wome…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:39 PM
1

The funny thing is they technically do, promised on multiple levels. UN declaration, EU constitution, national constitutions. But the powers that be never hesitate to make exceptions so it's a hollow promise. Believe a factually incorrect version of history? Jail. Blasphemy? Inciting religious hatred, jail. Porn we don't like? Jail. Hosting links we don't like on your website? Jail
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:29 PM
2

They say that all the flagged domains would be reviewed by a human being. But I'm not sure I believe that.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:58 AM
13

If you know someone with a .co.uk domain name with a website related to male victim services, male rape victim recognition, etc; Give them a heads up. They could find their domain names seized if the arbitrary powers in charge of this decide their site is not "legitimate."
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:09 AM
2

Do you really think they just pick up a complex gender identity purely by osmosis in that short a time? If so, then why do virtually the same results occur in children from different cultures with different ideas about gender and even in monkeys? I'm sorry, but gender is not the result of some global conspiracy!
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:41 PM
2

There's a difference between ending the shame and injustice that comes with society enforcing gender roles and attacking all expression of them. Too frequently I see sentiments where instead of encouraging society to accept those who choose nontraditional gender roles; society seems to be moving to look down on people who don't. What if I want to be a provider, a breadwinner, a traditionally masculine person? Why can't I decide to be that AND not be subjected to prejudice by the establishment an…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:01 AM
2

Or you can let the kid tell YOU what toys they want and not fucking politicize it.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:53 AM
2

they've had months or years of socialization to do so. Except the same thing happens with infants.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:50 AM
0

very nice series related to this and similar issues. (norwegian with english subtitles) http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xp0tg8_hjernevask-brainwashing-english-part-1-the-gender-equality-paradox_news
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:48 AM
1

Niss.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:44 AM
1

I don't understand this. What's unmasculine about cooking? Where are these people who supposedly think this? I've never met any.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:43 AM
1

Yikes, I thought we took care of that. Maybe we can leverage the uproar about the porn filter to get those blocks removed.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:27 AM
12

On second look, they actually mark it under the category "hate"
/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:29 PM
1

I thought it was apparent that we're not using the original meaning, but rather the colloquial meaning in the context of US politics. In the US, libertarian messages are nearly exclusive to conservative channels, the tea party was coordinated by Fox News, their candidates run on republican tickets, they campaign using sound-bytes and figures from conservative think tanks and they oppose nearly everything that (the American colloquial meaning of) liberals stand for.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:09 AM
-1

What's the relevance?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:48 AM
20

SENSATIONALIST LEDE!!!!! MEANDERING OPINION, MEMES AND NON-ARGUMENTS in conclusion the claim in the lede isn't really true even though we just spent several paragraphs begging the question assuming it was. Generic yellow journalism. Print bullshit, eschew responsibility. The come-off will be feminists years from now claiming "the SPLC said this is a hate site!!!" because 1) people will only remember the first few sentences at most, 2) that's what they want to believe and 3) it sounds legit unles…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:20 AM
-3

Because lolbertarians are just as intolerable as SJWs
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:07 AM
3

No, I mean they've come out and said, and they do act on this i.e. by maintaining McCarthy-esque blacklists, that anybody who doesn't agree with their ideology will be treated as persona non grata by all the members of their fruity little club. They want this to be the status quo across all atheist/humanist channels. Watch their videos. They don't even try to hide it. Classic Marxist cultural reform tactics- control the medium of speech, control the positions of power, control the lexicon used t…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:53 AM
4

Any time you're dealing with atheism- or humanist- related groups you risk encountering those calling themselves "atheism+", where the + is radical postmodernist gender/race theory and attacking/shunning anyone who doesn't agree with it.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 11:01 PM
5

On top of that, they're using a statistic that has NOTHING TO DO WITH GUNS as part of a gun-grab campaign.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:26 AM
2

If you want to be taken seriously about a political issue, do not use "some celebrities agree with me, that means I'm right because celebrities are important!" as an argument.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:45 AM
5

I'm not even talking about things related to any kind of politics or controversy. Even for mundane, everyday shit. I don't think I've ever seen a useful or informed answer on YA.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:11 AM
13

Yahoo answers is always like this though. NONE of the answers are ever helpful, most often the "top answer" is flat out wrong or unhelpful
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:41 AM
14

Looks like Kapersky has fixed it, but now bitdefender is blocking it: https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/085deb983bcabab80376870aa395d6c617294bcc45a2aea7d1dc7b797a13d2a2/analysis/
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:13 PM
3

Blocks like this can also occur if one of the advertising networks the site uses is compromised.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:04 PM
1

It's of course not possible to prove logically whether any one of those posters were or were not feminists. But that shouldn't prompt us to hand feminists control of which of their beliefs and teachings we can and can't talk about, and the ability to claim any feminist who gets called out "isn't a real feminist, maybe, so you don't get to discuss them." They're well practiced in walking grey areas, playing games and controlling definitions to avoid being held accountable. We know where these mis…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 06:00 PM
8

They've taken to anonymity so they can claim "straw feminism" if it's called out in public.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:24 PM
1

Not democrat, progressive. It's specifically progressives. They're the libertarians of the left, wacky to the core and oh so smug and proud.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:40 AM
8

I don't want to be told what my gender role should be. Including being "liberated" from the role I choose to follow.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:45 AM
4

Yes but it's banned/blocked from being linked here
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:13 PM
5

Good catch, didn't mean to link to it. It's a sub dedicated to hating this one
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:11 PM
1

AMR has linked to this post. Vote brigade incoming.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:58 PM
-4

Well if that's your personal experience that those kinds of things exist I can't really dismiss it, you've seen what you've seen.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:58 PM
-2

Accusations of hostility, bitterness and anger are a common theme in feminists' attack strategies, and they make those accusations even when none of those sentiments exist, and severely exaggerate or misrepresent them when they do. That, I feel, is the reason people perceive this community that way, far more than because of what we actually post. Acknowledging those accusations like they're a fact is a red flag for me. You are not a concern troll, but you're internalizing the garbage they repeat…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:43 PM
-9

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=concern+troll
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:16 PM
2

When loud, vocal minorities write laws and lead public opinion, ignoring them is not a successful response.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:59 PM
2

Minority or majority, they are evil and dangerous and need to be spoken about and fought against, even if it makes other self-identified Christians uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:51 PM
9

The good things that came out of feminism were equal rights, equal pay, and a culture of respect for women, and those things happened forty plus years ago. And yet, while women continue to suffer in India, in southeast Asia, in the middle east, in Africa... The people who should be defending those women are instead still in North America, attacking people who aren't their enemy based on nothing but gender and whining about 'privilege.'
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:46 PM
1

It's not bashing anything. They chose their logo. We chose ours. It's fair to compare them and what they represent.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:42 AM
1

TIL Rosanne Barr is insane
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:01 PM
1

That's unfortunate. Still, they didn't, as people once claimed, call /r/mensrights a hate group, and the article contains that information. I didn't expect it to from what I've heard about wikipedia lately. That's all I was saying.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:24 PM
1

Actually treated fairly, including SPLC's statement of clarification and demonstrating that people on the other side have no qualms about slander.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:44 PM
8

Wait, you mean, some feminists came and attended an MRA lecture, and didn't pull any fire alarms or dox anybody? There's great hope in that.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:28 AM
1

Yeah but showing even a single example of it, and there's endless ones to choose from, is more potent than simply claiming it to be the case.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:53 PM
1

How about instead of pathetically trying to undermine something because you dislike it, you instead prove in some fashion that something isn't relevant. I gotta point out: you can't prove a negative. You're seriously right though, trolls love that line. Have you seen this? I mean, every episode when he comes back to the social "scientists" they reply with exactly that. "I don't see why that's important! Why are you obsessed with that! Why does it matter that you just disproved all of my claims?"
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:47 PM
1

Links like that are useful for discussions elsewhere, when people play the female innocence/superiority card. But I agree they ought to be examples of inequality, not just "random woman commits random crime."
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:38 PM
2

What I see every day that really is starting to irk me is prison rape jokes. The fact that it's okay to imply that a man deserves to be raped, when the same comment about a woman would be met with a lynch mob, is really telling about how our society perceives men.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:34 PM
2

The article is full of anti-male sentiment and feminists patting themselves on the back for "empowering women", but the law itself actually sounds sane, according to President Fernandez: "So we want the mother to always get the money, except in cases where courts give legal custody to the father." Now, I don't know how fair the courts act about custody in Argentina, but if it says that whichever parent gets custody gets the check, then the law is fair at least.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 08:26 AM
3

You can't even get a permalink to a simple version of the page. These kinds of sites are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:32 AM
3

Look at all the people in the comments trying to cast shame and stigma on people who have unmutilated genitals. Look at the ignoramus claiming false equivalency when FGM comes up. I don't really care about circumcision that much as an issue, but when I see people with attitudes like that, it really gets my hackles up. Why is it anyone but a man's business what parts he does or doesn't have cut off of his body? I mean, it's cliche to compare it to a reversed situation, but if men were going aroun…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:24 AM
1

Yeah, I don't see anything gendered in here. A cop with a big head, liberals censoring speech they don't like, a system not giving someone their due rights. Could just as easily have been a female wearing the shirt.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:08 AM
1

And no, you can't switch someone's gender around. Having your genitals mutilated and pumping yourself full of hormones will not change it. Sex and gender are not the same thing. What you've said is absolutely correct- a person's identity and sexuality(gender) are not inherently decided by their organs(sex.) If, a person who was attracted to women and had a masculine personality changed physically into the opposite sex, they would still have a masculine personality and be attracted to women. The …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:42 PM
0

Sex is not the same as gender.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:32 PM
2

Title IX only applies to people with the "right" gender and/or skin colors.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:26 PM
1

This kind of thing is how columbine and virginia tech type shit happens.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:24 PM
2

You know damn well that's not what's being said. Good thing there's no limit on tags during troll hunting season.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:21 PM
2

Oh look another anti-MRA troll to tag.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:19 PM
4

You're using patriarchy in a strict historical context, for which all of your statements are correct- in that context a patriarchy is merely a culture where men lead. Everyone else is discussing and criticizing patriarchy as defined by feminism. Feminism uses the word patriarchy to describe systemic cultural oppression of women- all women, by men- all men. If you define oppression and misogyny as evil, then yes, it portrays all men as evil. By continuing to terms like patriarchy and privilege wh…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:30 PM
1

I like the part where you accidentally wrote July and fixed it hastily.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:04 PM
3

This is the sort of ridiculous comment that feminists then quote and use to back up their ideology. It's funny. This martinse guy's account has only existed for 3 days and ALL of his comments fit this description. Almost like... he's a sockpuppet of someone who wants to portray MRAs like this. Oh wait. tagged
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:01 PM
7

The relationship between sex, gender and attraction aren't a concrete thing. Respect is a choice, desire often isn't. You can teach people to show respect, but you can't command them to be attracted to someone they aren't.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:04 PM
16

Aspergers' sure has a lot of symptoms attributed to it, but having the sperg doesn't make you a violent, psychopathic bigot.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:40 PM
6

Not to mention gay and bisexual men and trans-men get the same bigoted treatment as cis straight men.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:36 PM
2

Well first... the main reason I see a player bringing a firearm into the locker room would be simply to secure it. If you own a gun, you're responsible for keeping it secure. Most gun crime is committed with stolen firearms, so keeping them safe when they're not on your person is extremely important. Of course they're not going to be bringing them in since they've been asked not to. But I feel it needs to be pointed out that something like a hundred million Americans own firearms, in CCW states …
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:21 AM
2

Feminism has two identities. There's the feminism that fought for women's right to vote... and there's the feminism that repeats fake statistics and calls anyone who points out they're fake a bigot. The latter likes to strut around wearing the corpse of the former when it's questioned. I see through your mask of flesh.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:16 AM
0

Are you saying gun owners are dishonest and disrespectful?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:52 AM
2

What do they mean by "no guns"? Are they dictating their player's political beliefs?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:50 AM
1

working towards a world where men and women have significantly more freedom of expression and choice. Yeah sure, the freedom to choose to express the gender roles feminists determine are okay. That's not solving a problem, that's trying to take control of a problematic establishment to use it as a political weapon. Feminism isn't entitled to define or limit other people's gender roles any more than as a man I would be entitled to tell a woman what her gender role is.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:38 PM
7

The author at least acknowledges that our point of view exists and that our issues are real. Let's see where they take it.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:42 PM
1

It's not about the "consequences of having sex". The only people who talk like that are religious whackos who want anyone who has sex outside of their rules to suffer.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:02 PM
1

Please do not link directly to facebook. Please do not link directly to mobile versions of pages. Please do not link to things that require an account to read.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:55 PM
1

And don't smile. And don't be polite. And also don't acknowledge that women exist, much less treat them with kindness. Acknowledging women might be seen as flirting which is the same thing as rape. How dare you even think about looking at someone of the opposite sex. Just stay in your house and don't talk to anyone, you disgusting creepy male rapist-waiting-to-happen. God I love RES so I can tag moronic trolls.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:58 AM
4

So she murdered three or four people(and who knows how many people they slept with before they found out she was positive, that are also going to die.) I can't fathom this. I really am glad I don't know any of the people involved personally. I don't know what I would do.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:44 AM
19

You really need to ask a lawyer about recording laws- they vary by state. In some states you may not need to inform the other party and, I think in some states it's legal to record but not useable in court if you don't inform them they're being recorded. You need to know exactly what your responsibilities are.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:33 AM
30

The fire about getting together to talk about how worthless fathers are on father's day. If we all went on facebook on mothers day and started posting about cases where mothers abused or abandoned their children- what am I saying, you can't say negative things about a female on facebook, that's hate speech.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:13 PM
3

Most of what you wrote was opinion.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:09 PM
49

We didn't start the fire.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:44 PM
3

While you're right that he's being a dick without any reason, the gender of the posters is not relevant to the discussion, and you throwing a bunch of insults at them isn't any more mature.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:42 PM
1

Still better than Mitt "I am an ignorant religious lunatic and proud of it" Romney
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:34 PM
1

I'm mainly in line with democrats' platform, although I support a few conservative causes(gun rights mainly.) D.C. has one hand in the pocket of corporations, the other in the pocket of religion. Liberals chase dreams of a conformist nanny state faux-utopia, Conservatives and libertarians chase dreams of returning us to the feudal age where people only have what human rights they can buy or con off someone else. Very few represent anyone's interests but their own. "It's all bullshit, and it's ba…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:33 PM
1

Wow. Regurgitating more tired shaming rhetoric that specifically demonstrates why we exist. We ARE the civil rights movement, and you won't silence us by calling us names or portraying us as part of some fictitious "patriarchy."
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:27 PM
2

Both the father and child are now understood to be in care What is this a euphemism for?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:25 AM
1

As for the submission; you're intentionally downplaying the issues we deal with as simple misogyny and portraying us as supporting misogyny. As for your terminology: We aren't all white We aren't all male These issues are global These issues affect people of all socioeconomic classes Supporting equal gender rights and LGBT rights are not right wing discrimination against men is not exclusive to any political group, and painting us as pro-discrimination is nothing but slander Dismissing our argum…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:07 AM
1

Based on you calling the entire subreddit "angry white men" and making submissions like this. You clearly don't belong here with that attitude.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:43 AM
1

Your bigotry showing through. GB2 /srs/
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:55 PM
2

We're never going to make friends with /srs/ sorts. All we can do is present the other side. And when the SJWs inevitably scream and pull fire alarms and make threats in response to reason, humor and facts, people will know who to side with.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:47 AM
11

TIL thinking violence in schools is a bad thing is "whining"
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:55 AM
5

What "not a big deal" looks like in Wisconsin, according to coffeemug444: 940.19 Battery; (1) Whoever causes bodily harm to another by an act done with intent to cause bodily harm to that person or another without the consent of the person so harmed is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:46 AM
7

So it's more reasonable to assume that the school tolerates aggravated assault as a rule?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:35 AM
14

And she knew she wouldn't be punished for it.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:31 AM
8

There's a bone right there, part of the pelvis. It'd be like getting kicked in the shin, only worse because the skin is more sensitive. If struck with enough force the bone can break and cause internal bleeding which can theoretically be fatal- this part applies to both genders and is why a groin kick shouldn't be seen as a joke.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:25 AM
1

"Eliminating gender stereotypes" is marxist SJW newspeak for "eliminating gender roles we don't like, that is, masculinity." Accomplished by creating shaming memes such as the one where really masculine guys are cast as closet gays(doubly evil because it perpetuates anti-gay stigma), or the bit about how a competitive man's thumosity is just his compensating for a small penis. You want gender equality? You get it the same way you get racial equality or any other sort of equality. You get it by t…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:22 AM
23

Par for the course, they're just doing it more visibly now. Feminist MO has always been silence, denounce, censor.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:14 PM
2

Yeah, it will definitely make people ask, and then you've got an education opportunity right there.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:35 AM
6

Because a tiny fraction of your tax money, about 3 dollars per year, is used to partially fund a public health program?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 09:54 AM
2

I noticed that it didn't become a media issue until we started stepping up women's involvement in the military.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:14 PM
0

Please don't hotlink facebook images.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:19 AM
1

So men aren't human beings unless they can prove it to her? For one, never speak to her again. For two, apply the same course of action to all of her friends. That shit is toxic and hostile and nobody deserves that in their life, someone saying such bigoted garbage about your entire gender.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:10 AM
1

Thanks for sharing that. I might post there one of these days.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:11 PM
1

There's a clear difference: you made a conscious, informed decision to take that medication based on an actual, verifiable diagnosis and the counsel of a responsible medical professional without a vested interest in medicating you.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:03 PM
3

A lot of autistic kids like I was get jammed into this system too. They use "behavior modification" techniques developed for use on violent convicts. They use isolation rooms and physical restraint as punishment. They raise kids in an environment where anyone is allowed to put their hands on you however they want and you aren't allowed to say no. If you talk about it they tell those people that you were being violent and they had to do whatever they did and it was your fault. They isolate you fr…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:58 AM
1

Front page!
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:59 AM
1

The record won't say anything about what he did or why. It will be "anon was disciplined for making unwelcome sexist comments and harassing a female teacher" or some bullshit like that.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:09 AM
1

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/the-catalog-of-anti-male-shaming-tactics/
/r/MensRights01/04/13 01:25 PM
2

How to read this and other TIL threads while the sub is fucked for april fools: http://www.reddit.com/r/YesterdayOnCracked/comments/1beqm6/read_existing_til_comments_by_appending_compact/
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:35 PM
3

"A few of us don't believe that, so you can't hold it against us!" I hear this one alot from people defending religious extremism. Semantics. Nothing but semantics.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:19 PM
0

Oh look a false equivalency. And who would ever put truffles on a pizza? The author clearly should never be within a thousand meters of a kitchen.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:34 PM
1

Soy is in almost every processed food nowadays, at least in the US. It's as pervasive as high fructose corn syrup.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:25 PM
1

Vegetables are yummy. So is meat. That's why I eat both.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:23 PM
-2

Where's Adria now, when there's actual sexism occurring?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 10:56 PM
-3

So feminists can still blame men. ..."Stop raping yourselves! stop raping yourselves!"
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:06 PM
2

No, of course not. That would be pro-rape!
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:59 PM
5

This is quickly becoming one of my favorite tools: http://regender.com/swap/http://www.nsnews.com/Trainee+counsellor+jailed+days/8067855/story.html
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:27 PM
2

Can't argue your point because it's bullshit? Block, report, censor.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:14 PM
-4

Well the teacher is a man, so not necessarily.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:38 PM
17

Twitter is public too. If she has a right not to be exposed to unwanted sexual themes and speech, then so do her followers and anyone who searches on twitter. Oh wait, that right doesn't exist. Being offended doesn't give you the right to try and silence people. Furthermore, calling a developer's conference a "context struggling with rampant sexism" is an opinion. Making a phallic joke is not sexist. Now if the subject was a woman and they were going "I'd put my dongle in her USB port!!!XD" I'd …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:48 AM
15

It's funny because they use individual cases of men sexually harassing, assaulting or raping women to prove "rape culture" exists and that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:20 PM
100

Psh, it's only creepy and worthy of guilt and shame if a MAN does it.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:10 PM
1

It would be interesting to see this broken down further by character archetype/role. Bet you any money more males cast in demeaning roles such as "dopey sidekick", "meathead goon", "flamboyant pompous arse", etc. while hardly any women are cast as such
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:43 AM
3

That's because they're pajamas.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:21 AM
1

What you guys are talking about is all gender. I think gender needs to be taken out of the equation in regards to bathrooms. The whole point is to avoid seeing the other's dangly bits and hoohas(sex), not to identify the people inside as male or female(gender).
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:05 AM
2

I think mens/womens bathrooms are meant to be divided by sex, not by gender.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:01 AM
7

Rage is normal. Assault is not.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:52 AM
8

This. Same with the zelda one. It's like the only reason they're making news of this is to try and find someone to be mad about it and then use them as a strawman for all men everywhere. Oh wait that's totally what they're doing.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:06 PM
4

None of these kinds of self-report surveys are ever done by people looking for serious data. It's always some school club trying to get a pool of data to cherry pick and use in some ridiculous ad campaign to support an agenda. In other news, around 77% of students at your college aren't drinking right.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:46 PM
-15

Ron Paul is also unapologetically racist, homophobic and anti-abortion.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:40 PM
1

It's not an edge case. If a man did that to a woman, that is, harassed and physically assaulted her until she had sex with him, it would be counted as rape and I don't think any feminist would question it.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:11 AM
17

Maybe if they had gone to school for to study science rather than rhetoric, this problem wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:33 AM
2

This is a great post, but I still don't see what's wrong with him coming here to anonymously share this, if he wants to get it off his chest.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:47 PM
1

So are all the people throwing "privilege" around as a form of hate speech.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:29 PM
3

So in other words, that poster believes men are born to be targets of violence and don't have a right to be free from it. Words fail to describe how much of a bigot she is.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:23 PM
3

You can't defend yourself from the shame society would impose on a man for admitting publicly to being afraid of being raped. Not with all the guns in the world.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:02 AM
1

It didn't START this way, but based on how it's used, when I hear it I consider it to carry the same level of hate any other racial, sexual or gender-based epithet does. The word is used to paint me with stereotypes and slander, all based on how I was born. It's become hate speech, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 10:49 AM
0

"Cis" and "trans" are deprecated prefixes for certain types of chemicals. Originally coined by the trans community to describe non-trans folks without a negative connotation attached. Since then, it's become the favorite bigoted slur misandrists use to perjoratively describe anyone who is straight, white and or male.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 10:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter