TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AltTab Archive

View 0 posts and 151 comments by AltTab on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It helps to consider the idea that a meaningful conversation can be had with a male friend, and isn't a requirement from your sexual partner. It's ideal if you can manage both, but if I have to choose one over the other, I'd choose the better sexual match with gusto. I'll leave deep conversations of philosophy and politics to my buddies in that case.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 07:51 PM
9

A shitstorm of magnificent proportions would occur. The legislation to ban such a device would make its way through Congress more quickly than the revelation of the hoax.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 04:47 PM
11

When have the admins ever demonstrated the smallest amount of unwillingness to swallow bullshit? I too fear for the future of TRP on reddit, but I'm happy to know that Puerarchy.com exists now.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:11 PM
4

Fantastic. I have an unofficial idea about subreddits I call the Rule of 10,000 where content becomes increasingly mainstream after about 10k subscribers and the subreddit loses what made it great. Please don't allow that to happen here! The Red Pill has been my favorite subreddit for quite some time now. I'd hate to see it go the way of seddit. Otherwise, great work guys!
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 02:52 PM
1

No worries, just wanted to make sure we were on the same page.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 09:33 PM
1

I'm interested in seeing the movie, if only to use it as a tool to illustrate why the blue pill is poison to friends who don't get it. ...but I suspect I'd find it so horrifying I'd have a hard time finishing it.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 08:00 PM
1

That's a good example. But I think you maybe meant a word like "plethora" because dearth implies a lack.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 07:07 PM
1

I know someone like this. Even the most minor infraction, even if it's to their benefit is grounds for shock and outrage on their part. Unsurprisingly, they have selected a career in law enforcement.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 09:39 PM
3

Agreed, Funcuz is getting at the quality of the facial hair itself. I've never seen a lady-mustache and thought "Willikers! That's some luxurious facial hair!" But my old boss... god damn. Now HE had a mustache.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:20 PM
6

I agree, I'd love to be able to quote a study for this to someone.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 09:26 PM
–

I believe you're thinking of Balbo Biggins; he was a habbit.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:01 PM
-2

No kidding. It was meta as fuck!
/r/seduction21/12/11 09:04 PM
–

Asian? Leftist? What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/12/11 01:42 PM
6

Well clearly she has infinity-math percent of the ability of an average man, in addition to her ability to entirely make up statistics. Beware, logic-bound testosterone havers!
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:21 AM
3

I agree. I'll never accept the idea that I should just "get over it." I'm perfectly happy, but it's never OK that it was done to me. I had no choice in the matter, and something intensely personal was taken from me. It's never happening to my children.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 04:53 PM
3

Fair enough, just curious. Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 07:34 PM
2

Gotcha. Thanks for the information.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 07:34 PM
3

True, but neither does America and all males 18 and older have to register in case there ever is one. Do you happen to know if that is still done?
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:34 PM
8

sigh Yeah. This was all political, and all I cared about was practical matters. I've gotta find a new job...
/r/MensRights05/04/11 04:34 PM
7

Oh god. That kills me. Both issues actually, but the second one has been on my mind lately. We had an opening at the company I work at. Since I work in tech, there aren't a lot of women. We started interviewing and had two female applicants, one who was totally under-qualified, one who was moderately under-qualified, and then we interviewed several males, including one who was a slam dunk for the skills we wanted. I (being a senior in my department and part of the hiring process) wanted the guy …
/r/MensRights05/04/11 03:34 PM
1

So... your job would be available then? I'll just go ahead and polish my resume now... But seriously, I hope you do find something fulfilling that you really love to do in your new job. And keep with the PUA, my friend. It really does improve all social areas of your life.
/r/seduction31/03/11 02:56 PM
1

Considering the second story was a bullshit retail job, and that you managed to close the entire store by suggesting to weak-minded individuals that it was the end of the world... I'd have framed that write-up. That's the best laugh I've had all day, thanks dude.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:00 PM
0

Certainly not in a leadership capacity. Trusting women to fight for Men's Rights is like letting slave owners argue for abolition.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 06:12 PM
1

Q: "How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?" A: THAT'S NOT FUNNY!
/r/MensRights05/01/11 07:31 PM
1

What you say is true, but it's hilarious to see PedobearsBloodyCock advising someone to tone it down. ;)
/r/seduction06/12/10 02:00 AM
29

Penis hands? Is she implying he has 10 finger-cocks? Seriously, this woman sounds like she gets her dialog from an episode of South Park.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 01:24 PM
1

And I would agree with you. But I was curious about ceris's views.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 10:38 PM
6

I'm sorry you're being downvoted, that's not really what we're supposed to do with comments we disagree with. I do, however, disagree with you and I was wondering if you could explain part of your comment, or maybe just expand on it: Women have the short end of the stick on SO many things in this world that I tend to side with them on pretty much every issue, even close ones, with the mindset of "Yeah this might be grey area but I will side with her". Could you give me a few examples that make y…
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:17 PM
9

Bah, the survival rates for breast cancer are pretty solid. For something like liver or pancreatic cancers your 10 year survival rate is shit! Shit I say! But breast cancer is a meme. It's an activity for middle class women to feel good about themselves while buying an overpriced piece of pink crap. It's not really about the cancers at all, just about feeling "involved" and raising "awareness."
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:55 PM
1

This is false. It is just an untrue statement of the law. I'm also going to need clarification on this point. I'd like to know what you meant here. From the real world examples I've seen, if he doesn't want it and she does, then too bad he's paying for it. He has no ability to opt out of financial "responsibility" for the child, and she has the weight of the court and legal systems to enforce it.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:17 PM
2

What I got from that is that before doing the Vegas thing, he was at the top of his world. He had hit level 80. He had maxed out. Having been through this kind of cycle before, I can tell you that if it feels like there's nothing for you to strive for, it gets boring. Then he went to Vegas and found a new level to strive for. I think that's the meaning he gets out of it. It's not the wealth per se, it's the challenge. But I'm with you. Decent food, decent liquor, comfortable home and all the tim…
/r/MensRights19/08/10 02:49 PM
2

Whoa, calm down buddy. I've seen no evidence in his comment that angryshark is a mangina. And as far as You truly deserve to be ripped to shreds in divorce settlements and enslaved for life. Nobody deserves that.
/r/MensRights19/07/10 05:47 PM
3

Yikes. I know it's a mess, but I'm constantly brought new information about just what an unforgivable clusterfuck it really is.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 07:00 PM
5

I'll rephrase: extremely shitty. But I was looking at it as minimizing damage in a completely fucked up situation. Believe me, I agree it's entirely fucked.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 06:59 PM
8

It's a little bit shitty, but at least he would be free of child-support at that point, right? Then he just has the battle of keeping some finances after the undoubtedly brutal divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 05:02 PM
8

Whoa, no. Not even if he's paying child-support (dubious) or alimony (outright bullshit). Because though the children should reap the benefits, the ex should have NO relationship to his good fortune whatsoever. He owes her nothing.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 07:57 PM
1

There's also a huge pressure on people to "be more accepting" and they are constantly reminded "you aren't perfect either." My circle of friends insists I'm too picky, but of the potentials/ex's I've cast aside the ones that my friends have actually dated have come to the same conclusions I did... it just took them much longer (a year and a half in one case.) I feel like some people who aren't so immune to the meddling of friends in relationships would tend to cave to that kind of pressure and g…
/r/MensRights25/06/10 07:55 PM
2

Touche, but you can definitely shoot them in the head.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 02:15 PM
7

It's a pretty lame game and I think what it represents is incredibly, mind-bogglingly stupid... but it doesn't worry me that much. Games are games. I've killed plenty of hookers, ran pedestrians down with my car, and shot a drug-dealer priest. I did all of this in Grand Theft Auto. Hell, I accidentally shot a kid in the head in Fallout 3. (And by accidentally, read: drunkenly.) My point is, we all do fucked up things in video games. I'm not about to ban a form of speech and entertainment. But, w…
/r/MensRights18/06/10 03:40 PM
1

D,OIMATA = Dude, Obviously I Meant All The Acryonyms
/r/MensRights16/06/10 04:36 AM
2

OMGTWTFR = Oh My God That Was Totally Fucking Ridiculous (And I mean all of it.)
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:54 AM
2

I'm pretty gutted about it actually, this job (small company of ~30) was absolutely amazing in how well everyone worked together. In less than a year, new boss completely ruined most of the dynamics that made it great. I wouldn't have believed it was possible. I should note, none of these women are young or blonde. They're mid 40's and feature a variety of non-natural hair colors.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 02:07 PM
2

You know, I got into the work force and my first manager was a guy. A real fucking creep, he looked like a gray haired version of Paul Giamatti who was perpetually talking about going to "tittie bars" after work. I like strippers as much as anyone, but dude could make my skin crawl. He was fair with work, sure, but he was also an uncaring asshole about firing people. The second boss I got was a woman, and she was a machine. She could quell disputes between various parties with aplomb, she could …
/r/MensRights11/06/10 07:55 PM
1

Was the word "in-creased" changed to "on-creased" to make it less penetrative?
/r/MensRights09/06/10 05:54 PM
4

True statement, but nlakes was rebuking society as a whole for its behavior, not just women.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 01:49 PM
7

I agree, I'd love to have solid statistics but I won't ever accept the polygraph as much better than an e-meter. It's junk. I'd like a more rigorous study to assert numbers gathered from more reliable sources that stand up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 02:18 AM
1

I don't feel he is saying you need to conform to any standards of masculinity. Obviously he feels harried by the estrogen in his life, and he needs safe refuge to bask in the warm glow of his testosterone. I can relate.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 08:08 PM
1

They almost definitely would be telling him that. It's a kind of damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't situation. I'm sure that if he were more feminine they would want him to butch up, but they don't want to deal with the corollaries of boyhood: lots of kinetic energy and rambunctious curiosity. They'd really honestly rather he played quietly with dolls. Partially it's lazy, partially it's not knowing what to do with boys.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 07:28 PM
2

I would say, however, that a girl being more masculine is perfectly acceptable. "Tom-boy" or "girl-power" or what have you. A boy being more feminine is definitely not so celebrated. And perversely, they also receive admonishment for being too masculine, or macho, or just being "such a boy." My friends have a son and a daughter and the son is always getting an earful for not being "more like his sister." Which I've pointed out to them (on a few occasions) is really asking him to be more feminine…
/r/MensRights27/05/10 06:57 PM
1

It's not so much that I think we deserve to know it, as much as I don't really care if we do or not. However, if declared innocent, I'm fine with those records not being public.
/r/MensRights21/05/10 02:51 PM
1

Strange though it may seem, rapists are on an even lower level than murderers. In fact, murder is so without baggage, so acceptable to us as a society that we have more than a few shows that feature it as the main theme. Dexter most obviously. Being associated with murder does not carry the same pariah-making status as being accused of rape. Rape on the other hand is vile, and we have no shows glorifying it (for good reason). There is no silver lining to being accused of rape. Nobody thinks you'…
/r/MensRights21/05/10 01:22 PM
7

FaustWolf, Sorry for the animosity you received there. MR is a movement that is in its infancy, and it means a lot to the people involved. Being that it's in fledgling mode, it's something that feels like it can be stripped away or subverted. So, you'll sometimes have a bit of xenophobia. I apologize, but I understand where it comes from. As far as your sources, I don't have them myself, but only because I'm lazy. I'd start in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but that site is frankly ugly and can…
/r/MensRights14/05/10 03:16 AM
2

Ok, now I'd love to see a story about Kiera Knightly wanting to make out with me. Go. (In all seriousness thanks for making me a little bit less cynical. Good work on finding that for me.)
/r/MensRights22/04/10 01:15 AM
3

It's really more of an observation. And I'm a rampant /r/atheist, I'd love to see a story outlining a man getting off for this kind of crime.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 12:34 AM
1

I agree. I'd be shocked.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 12:30 AM
4

I believe the thinking is that this kind of leniency is the province of women. A man whose child died because he refused to feed it would likely be jailed. And he'd certainly get off much worse than "you poor thing, you've been through enough."
/r/MensRights21/04/10 11:26 PM
8

Yeah, it's amazing how this guy missed the point in almost every specific example he offered. I agree with the quoted sentence used for the title, but the rest of his article was dreck.
/r/MensRights20/04/10 07:24 PM
3

So feel free to hang him in the court of public opinion, then. But I don't think it's fair to do so, nor do I know what happened between them. In that situation: I'm going with a presumption of innocence barring evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights19/04/10 11:23 PM
2

That's true, but in situations like those is it not better to err on the side of innocence?
/r/MensRights19/04/10 09:03 PM
3

I don't even care which subreddit you submitted this to. That was gold.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 05:10 PM
11

They're half right. There really is no reason for feminists to feel threatened by this -- however, the only reason for us to feel victorious about it is that it is finally brought to light. I'd say legitimizing the plight of men abused by their partners is cause for celebration, even if the subject itself is grim.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 01:02 AM
2

Freshly minted 25 year old here. Looks like I'm the first representative from the quarter-century crowd. I wear it proudly.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 07:46 PM
3

I'm thrilled that this is what they're considering. I was frankly lucky to be such a damned nerd, because I found the context and application of what I was learning hilariously awesome (for instance, it was in chemistry that I figured out how I could construct my own still). But most of my enthusiasm was self generated. Very few of my (mostly female) teachers seemed to know how to interest boys. Without a practical application, or a context to put it in at the very least, a fair percentage of gu…
/r/MensRights30/03/10 11:22 PM
9

You would think so, and so would I actually, but I've seen many instances of laws where it is impossible for rape to occur if the victim is male. And it does also serve to broaden the thinking about these types of crimes. If it's deeply ingrained in a person's mind that rape is a Male -> Female transaction, then it'll be very hard to convince that person that perhaps a male was raped by a female.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 06:11 PM
1

Friends and shocked feminists?
/r/MensRights17/03/10 09:48 PM
4

Seriously, at that rate you'll have enough to leave her to stay in a hostel in... 46 years.
/r/MensRights17/03/10 02:55 PM
-1

What I felt the truly funny part was that you, yourself, have offered no "evidence to back up [your] statement." If it's really as pervasive as you say, you should be able to find 3 or 4 handy examples to link to. At the moment I see none.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 09:15 PM
5

First I upvoted you because I agreed with what you said... then you had to go and throw that P.S. in there. YOU WILL TAKE YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT SPIDERMAN BACK! Batman is undoubtedly awesome, but Spiderman has actual powers. Bats is quite wealthy and extremely intelligent, but he's got no spider powers either. In the end, your overall message saved you, but there's no reason you can't have a world were Batman/Spiderman coexist peacefully. Isn't that what Men's Rights is about?
/r/MensRights15/03/10 09:14 PM
4

vomits profusely
/r/MensRights15/03/10 03:20 PM
3

Some people find it soothing to downvote things they can't square with their worldview. It's something done to stave off cognitive dissonance, or at least express it.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 03:05 PM
17

Applause
/r/MensRights08/02/10 10:48 PM
8

Hmm, minimum 4 hours a month? That's nothing! You've given me something to think about. I wouldn't mind being a mentor to a younger lad. After all, I'm constantly wishing I could go back in time and explain a thing or to to myself that took me way too long to figure out on my own. What age groups might I get matched up with?
/r/MensRights30/01/10 02:41 AM
5

It will when we all miss him terribly! (Or when Dracula shows up again.)
/r/MensRights30/01/10 02:40 AM
1

I'm honored to be the first to get to downvote you for that.
/r/MensRights29/01/10 01:06 AM
4

Yeah, having a vag is like +25 to moral superiority.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 04:12 PM
1

Bravo! Jolly good show, sir.
/r/MensRights17/01/10 11:15 PM
4

You hate the Bard? What did Shakespeare ever do to you? (I'm guessing it's a case of the D being too close to the S, right? You probably hate bars, no?)
/r/MensRights17/01/10 05:20 PM
2

Well classical pirates carried Rapiers, so I can see where she's coming from. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights17/01/10 06:16 AM
1

I think you have just boiled it down to the it's barest form. Though I would argue that you're forgetting about immediate emotional needs (though this accounts for far less sex than I'd like it to...)
/r/MensRights17/01/10 05:58 AM
2

Well there is a certain vindication, as in my college biology classes I had one professor who took every opportunity she could to just crow about how males are going away, and the Y-chromosome is shrinking and soon will be gone. She said all of this with the kind of relish you'd hear in the voice of someone describing the demise of their enemy. ...so whether it's a Men's Right's issue or not, I am quite glad to hear it.
/r/MensRights14/01/10 02:19 PM
1

Thanks, it's definitely something to keep in mind. We wouldn't want to become as hysterical as the feminists are over every little issue. It's really all just life and the vast majority is grey area between the extremes. I only let it affect me when it's a huge clusterfuck of anti-male bias. The small stuff I let slide. (Unless someone is casually suggesting that someone pay child-support for a kid that isn't his; that gets a verbal beatdown from me.)
/r/MensRights12/01/10 08:58 PM
3

I can't be sure of what the original intent was, but I put the emphasis on "how." So: Goes to show how many women out there think. Though it is somewhat awkward sentence construction.
/r/MensRights08/01/10 02:52 AM
8

Thank you Rev. Dr. Jackson.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 04:03 PM
4

Sexist! Why don't you just take away their right to vote too?!
/r/MensRights16/12/09 08:17 PM
2

/sigh Here's the thing about the definition argument. It generally goes like this: Person A makes a comment about a negative effect of feminism. Person B takes great umbrage at the implication that the negative effect has anything to do with feminism, as there are no negatives included in the definition. Q.E.D. This is not real feminism. (Often times this is where an ad hominem slides neatly into place.) Person A replies pointing out logical fallacies, asking them to account for certain actions …
/r/MensRights11/12/09 03:12 AM
11

We were talking about this in my office today (dangerous I know). The males mostly uniformly agreed that the whole thing was bullshit, and that it should require much more to send someone to prison, let alone accuse them publicly. The women in my office, at least the vocal ones (almost all), voiced the opinion that "he probably did something" and he's a jerk anyway, with the unspoken meaning that he deserved it for not treating her well. It strikes me that this kind of thinking is sadly common.
/r/MensRights11/12/09 02:49 AM
4

AND I THINK YOU MEANT "YOU'RE" INSTEAD OF YOUR!
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:02 PM
1

It does, but it is a response to /r/LadyBashing. Perhaps a necessary one, but it's not what I'm talking about here. What I want is a place for us to discuss Men's Rights without needing to be anything other than completely candid. I'm considering making it a private /r/.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:00 PM
2

I agree that being strong willed and stating your position are things we have no problem with. I'd never change that. And I'm as sick as anyone of people treating masculinity like a defect. But don't you think there would be a benefit to having a place specifically for getting into the kinds of conversations that opponents consider sexist?
/r/MensRights18/11/09 02:18 PM
1

Actually, I kind of love it. A pub environment isn't far off either.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:38 AM
4

/r/WomenSuck - definitely expresses annoyance, but too focused on women. It should be about us. And that should be OK. /r/NotARapist - I did sort of smile at this one. It acronymizes to NAR. As a redditor, even the most tangential reference to narwhals is of interest. Personally, I'd thought of something like: /r/MensAngryDome or maybe... /r/GentlemensAngerLounge but it's got a kind of... oddness to it.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:26 AM
2

I'm going to be a steward of it. I'll do as much as I can for as long as I can to bring others through to the other side. But I suspect I'll need the help of others. What I want to create is the former; a place for open, candid discussion. The best way for a person to shed that kind of anger is to express it. Even if it's "wrong." It'll get sorted out. As far as the creation of an unbridled hate pit... I think that sort of place would burn itself out quickly. Pretty soon, no one would want to vi…
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:20 AM
2

That's not really what I want it to be, but I look at it this way: if that poison is going to emerge why not have it elsewhere? I went through a patch of several months where I was filled with a similar feeling of anger towards the way the world was. And about the ways in which I feel men are getting a raw deal. But because I was able to explore it, and discuss it without being sniped at, it passed. I'm much better off now. I've chewed my way through that confusing tangle of feelings and sorted …
/r/MensRights18/11/09 03:04 AM
3

Ok, so one vote for the "Mens Clone Wars Quotes and Cathartic Venting" subreddit then?
/r/MensRights18/11/09 02:50 AM
2

If there is interest in this idea, I think we should discuss possible names for the new venue. I'm open to suggestions.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 02:46 AM
3

I think it would be helpful if you had a particular counter-example of a male in that kind of position and public reaction going negatively for him. I could potentially see that happening, but without a case-study for comparison it's exists only in potential. And Christ, if we're going to get uppity about potential grievances, then we'd start doing the kinds of things we enjoy making fun of in the most ridiculous of the feminists.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 07:29 PM
1

No! Don't reflect on that statement as it applies to you. It's a noble endeavor, but it leads to infinite-recursive-navel-gazing. You will be in a world, nay universe, entirely of kanuk876. Beware!
/r/MensRights17/11/09 04:23 PM
1

I did not know that at all. There are enough anti-MR trolls around that sometimes an ambiguous comment seems slanted towards the dismissive. So I'm sorry for the sarcasm, but this is still something that warrants attention and action.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 02:54 AM
1

I regret only that I have but one upvote to give. Thanks for a serious, quality explanation.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 05:20 PM
1

Hmm. So it's already built up in most of the existing population then? In that case, the only way to avoid it would be to not nurse the child? Unless there's some kind of filtration that can be performed on breast milk... a sort of Brita for Boobs, I'm out of ideas. You've given me much to consider, WineInACan.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 05:03 PM
1

Thank you. That's what I'm here for. And I didn't know the bit about breast milk. I don't have children yet, but when I do, I'm going to take every measure to keep this away from their developing bodies (male or female.)
/r/MensRights16/11/09 04:25 PM
3

I have learned very little gives them pause. Cognitive Dissonance prevents this from ever becoming an issue. It would be good for us to remember that for ourselves.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 03:14 PM
2

Oh, well I guess we shouldn't worry about it then. Call off the research everybody! Old news!
/r/MensRights16/11/09 02:01 PM
2

Thanks for this. It's fantastic to see exactly what it is we're trying to protect; the father/child relationship.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 03:22 AM
3

I know, I'm amused by it more than anything. And I thought others might be interested to know as well.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 04:08 PM
2

I'm kidding, I don't think it's Aeirk. But apparently somebody has made an Us-Based novelty account. Probably not a good thing for actual MRA's, but I did chuckle a little.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 03:37 PM
1

Ha! That's awesome.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 08:28 PM
3

I play RTS's; everything is resources. It's a pretty straightforward, and all encompassing, reference to his qualities. You don't find his wealth, genes, or social standing to be resources? Madness, just madness. Anyway, that aside, your other point was that you can't imagine women wanting to marry us. Fear not! We don't intend to propose to any of them.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 08:23 PM
8

Statements like those are why Raff001 will never be married again. His statement is not viewed from the perspective of his personal pain and hardship that he went through in the marriage, but the resources he was offering to women. Since you, based on nothing, have decided that these resources aren't appealing, you've decided that he's of no consequence. Thanks for being a fantastic example of the problem!
/r/MensRights05/11/09 04:03 PM
4

And did I ever feel good about myself? [citation needed]
/r/MensRights05/11/09 03:43 AM
9

Again, misread. I said he called Obama a human, which is more than I can say you called him. Though, that one was shitty typing on my part, so my apologies. I just didn't want a whole article ignored for a few comments that were misquoted to begin with.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 03:42 AM
10

Actually, you're putting a more racist spin on it than was present (if any.) Not that I agree with him, but his quote was the following: At this very moment, a grossly ignorant human being named Barack Obama may become our next president of the United States. He didn't say "ignorant black man." He called Obama a human being, which is more than I can say of you.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 03:07 AM
3

My comment was in jest, but I felt horrible for the children too. That was the only part of the video I'd have done differently. Take one of the (rational) adults and have them watch the kids well away from the frothing-at-the-mouth lunatic with a blunt metal object.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 02:01 AM
6

Yeah, I feel for the owner of the truck.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 01:00 AM
11

Something to the extent that for "thousands of years girls didn't matter, now it's payback time," but couched in less direct terms.
/r/MensRights21/10/09 07:50 PM
2

Yeah, on behalf of the more reasonable side of things around here, sorry for this bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 06:20 PM
7

Meh, this one has nothing to do with anything but hate for Saydrah. I don't really think anything of this statement. Basically she's saying that anime conventions are filled with horny, desperate, virginal males who have no idea how to attract a woman, and who resort to buying them things (all in all, not a horrible strategy.) I'm going to say this one is pretty benign.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 01:58 PM
1

Nah. I believe you. I just think it's pretty remarkable. And certainly not most people's experience with the sauce.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 01:59 PM
1

Congratulations: you are Alcohol Jesus. Even if you died of consumption, you'd get right back up feeling great the next day.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 09:30 PM
1

I'm a fairly stout drinker of alcohol (having been into moonshine before my 18th birthday gave me a bit of a tolerance) but even I think it's somewhat outlandish to say you haven't had a hard time remembering the night before after a full fifth of whiskey. My tolerance isn't what it used to be since I don't drink quite as much, or as hard, as I used to. But I still occasionally run into situations where I completely forget things. Case in point: I borrowed 20 bucks from a friend because there wa…
/r/MensRights23/09/09 07:59 PM
8

I like these comments today. I like that we're using critical thinking on an article that many of us already fundamentally agree with. Reason and logic should be the foundation of the MR movement, and I'm glad to see it here.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 01:48 PM
1

Make friends with the English. When I hang out with them I hear roughly 7-8 cunts per minute. It quickly loses its shock value.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 02:04 PM
2

Whoops. Didn't see you had already commented on that before I refreshed the page. I'll leave it; bad form to delete comments.
/r/MensRights09/09/09 09:28 PM
6

Laywergirl before that.
/r/MensRights09/09/09 09:03 PM
5

I love how it doesn't matter that it wasn't him, it doesn't matter that he could not have fathered this child, and how everyone agrees this should not be going on... And yet, no one has the authority to stop it. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 02:58 PM
3

I dunno about that. No doubt there's competition for girls, I was a part of that myself. But the thing is, the kind of full on competition, complete with jibes back and forth, and a little pride from being at the top of the pile is exactly the kind of thing teachers discouraged me from in a mixed gender environment (high school, middle school, etc.) It was more of the "let's all participate and make everyone feel good" crap, which does nothing to light a fire under me, and which I can easily see…
/r/MensRights25/08/09 01:18 PM
3

Honestly, I think this is because of good old fashioned no-holds-barred competition. There was nothing that motivated me in school (especially in college, where being in Computer Science meant being in an all-male environment) as much as competition with fellow males. It wasn't petty, but always a game to out-do the other. To study harder, to put in a few extra minutes/hours on a project: whatever it took to kick asses. For me, that was always the motivator: to be the best in a competitive envir…
/r/MensRights25/08/09 03:20 AM
2

Maybe nothing amazing, but I thought it was an exchange worth sharing. It's this kind of cohesion that's important in becoming enough of a force to make people listen and take us seriously.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 12:48 AM
10

Thank you so much for doing this. I argue some of these points almost daily when I hear people around me spouting well-worn canards in reference to men. I really appreciate your efforts.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:39 AM
2

Just so we're clear this I understand downvoting.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 07:52 PM
1

Heh, in response, I am downmodded.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 10:08 PM
15

Here's what I want to know: why be such a coward? Unless it's plainly offensive, why down mod something like this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8qvet/globally_violence_is_a_leading_killer_it_accounts/ It's a statistic. It's neutral. It's being used as part of a discussion about the way in which men are ignored by the "system," and yet downmodded. Blows my mind. I like that someone pointed it out.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 09:34 PM
1

I agree, this kind of free pass for women to beat on men is a problem. ...but since it's Pink we're talking about, this is really an issue of man on man violence.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 05:34 PM
2

I was just asking that yesterday. It's apparently for Women Behaving Badly.
/r/MensRights27/03/09 04:39 AM
2

To be fair, they were never a very lively crowd.
/r/MensRights25/03/09 09:09 PM
1

Perfect. Now if you just filmed it like Spliff you could make a killing in Snuff Films.
/r/MensRights25/03/09 07:44 PM
2

Many thanks.
/r/MensRights25/03/09 06:40 PM
3

Question: what does WBB stand for? I missed that explanation at some point.
/r/MensRights25/03/09 02:10 PM
1

I get that you were pissed, and you made a mistake. That's fine. Part of being a man is facing it. I hope you come back, you opened my eyes with the Mens Rights reddit, and even though it certainly has its flaws, it has been an encouraging sign for me, that maybe other people have perceived the same things I have. Coming here for the first time I found out I wasn't the only one who felt like he was paying for the sins of generations past. For all of this, and for the role you played in bringing …
/r/MensRights28/02/09 07:00 PM
1

Imagine we do this. The next response is as follows: "Upper-class white males are privileged to be shot by highly skilled snipers with preferential treatment in terms of the exact position in which they stand as they are shot against the wall. This bias is unthinkable."
/r/MensRights17/02/09 10:28 PM
1

Long answer: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
/r/MensRights23/01/09 04:19 PM
1

Short answer: No.
/r/MensRights23/01/09 03:54 PM
0

The tl;dr version is as follows: "How DARE you have a position, supported by facts and logic, that differs from my false statistics conjured out of thin air to support my biases! BANNED!"
/r/MensRights09/01/09 06:30 PM
2

Let me begin my comment by saying I'm an elitist asshole. That out of the way, I was one of these boys. The only thing that kept me going through the tedium and the boredom of the classroom was the looks on the faces of teachers and classmates when they realized I had the highest grade in the class. The clown in the back of the room, the one who's "one of [your] problem students," just destroyed the bell curve. You can only do it early in the year, but oh is it sweet. My advice to you, if you ar…
/r/MensRights01/01/09 12:59 AM
2

way ahead of me, pn6, I was just about to submit this.
/r/MensRights31/12/08 10:05 PM
2

Frankly, I agree.
/r/MensRights12/12/08 08:26 PM
5

NO! Absolutely not! ...they have to be related to you and male.
/r/MensRights12/12/08 05:56 PM
6

Or one who responded to "I love you" with "I know" In this case, you have married Han Solo.
/r/MensRights11/12/08 10:31 PM
2

Pfft. Like I haven't seen them dancing with joy with every mention of artificial parthenogenesis. I think you called it Binary.
/r/MensRights10/11/08 08:56 PM
15

Now, to say someone deserves to get raped in response to this is out of line. What they DO deserve, however, is a prison stay, and they should be forced to talk to ACTUAL rape victims until they are humiliated at the grotesque act of selfishness they have committed by falsely claiming they have been raped. It's not a bad idea to force them to register as a sex offender either. After all, didn't she commit a sex crime as well?
/r/MensRights31/08/08 07:17 PM
1

Shocking. ahem
/r/MensRights12/08/08 07:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter