TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Altaccount011412 Archive

View 2 posts and 222 comments by Altaccount011412 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I heard a lot of votes were cast before the debate, is that true? If so, I feel like that might have saved Fetterman, as that debate was a disaster for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 08:46 PM
2

Something is misogynistic if it is hateful to women or dehumanizes them. Saying that I don’t want a high body count woman isn’t misogynistic, as I don’t think that a woman’s (or anyones) human intrinsic value is determined by body count. However, for me personally, a high body count isn’t relation material, so it lowers her relationship value (for me).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 08:37 PM
1

Your point number 5 is extremely complex tho. For example, it’s a Sorites paradox. What makes 18 legally ok but not 17 and 364 days not ok? Conversely, if 18 is legally ok, why is 17 and 364 days NOT ok? Of course we also take into account the age of the other partner. For example, 19 is ok for an 18 year old, but is 20, 21, 22, etc okay? Then you have to throw in the financial aspect that is more often than not, apparent in age gap relationships. However, even for the “pRefRontAl coRteX” people…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 12:15 AM
6

Testosterone is a hell of a drug
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 04:14 AM
4

Yup, women will say that men in real life don’t care, but we play the same game that many women do. Women will lie about their body count because they may like a guy and not want him to know her past, since she knows he might leave her. Many men care about body count, but know that if they ask, a woman might leave them. This is why men have to look for other signs that may indicate she’s had a “hoe phase”. The more signs, the higher the likelihood.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 04:12 AM
1

I don’t know, maybe he was just curious about what PPD men find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:28 AM
1

So I guess you’re subscribed to r/biggerthanyouthought
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:25 AM
1

Well, I just answered your above question. In general, I do not believe that men adjust their ratings of women based on what other men say, but women often do adjust their rating of a man based on what other women say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:18 AM
2

Sure, there is definitely a range where tall becomes too tall, but I just choose those two because they used the same digits. However, they are not the same distance away from the mean. 5’6” is 3.5 inches below the US average male height, whereas 6’5” is 7.5 inches above the average male height. Still, I think we both know deep down that a taller man is going to have an advantage in hookups. No woman on tinder says “only below 6ft,” whereas a decent portion say “only above 6 ft”.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:16 AM
1

You mean like group think? Just from my personal experience and what I’ve heard from other men (both in person and on YouTube), men are my individualistic when it comes to rating a woman. However, woman do care what their friends think about their partners attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:12 AM
1

Face alone is a 7-8, but I’ll be generous and give the 8. Upper body is an 8 I guess. She’s got a flat stomach and decent sized breasts, but I think she’d look a little better if she worked out a bit more. Lower body is a 6. Yeah, I personally like the slim thick look with some ass. So 8+8+6=22. 22/30 = 7.33
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:08 AM
0

Right, but this is no different than women who sleep with the bad boys then marry a square. A man with options isn’t going to be celibate just because he wants a virgin, especially considering that there aren’t many virgin women in western countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:58 AM
1

Right, but most humans don’t think of statistics when they’re thinking of this stuff. Do you think a woman who is 5’6” is going to do some statistics on your height and determine how many standard deviations you are from the norm, or is she going to go off her real world/cultural upbringing? There is no woman who is going to say “well, he’s 5’8 and the average is 5’9.5” with a standard deviation of 2.5 inches, so he’s within 1 standard deviation, and being within that range is statistically cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:49 AM
1

That’s what I’m planning on doing 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:38 AM
2

Genuine question, all else being equal, do you think a 5’4” woman would rather hook up with a 6’5” man or a 5’6” man? Taller men absolutely will have an advantage in hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:37 AM
6

Not everyone who is against abortion is doing so because they hate woman. Some people truly do see that fetus as a new human being, and thus think it’s murder, which by definition is immoral. Me personally, I really understand both sides. As someone who likes children and has helped raise plenty of them, I see why many pro lifers are against it. However, even though I’m not a woman, I absolutely understand their anger in being told what they can do with their body. At the end of the day, I kinda…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:31 AM
4

The great body count/promiscuity debate isn’t just focused on whether or not they’ll be safer, and even that’s just an opinion of yours. Sure, there are some reformed 304’s that become good wives, but there are former 304’s that make terrible wives or never really changed. Your theory of sow wild oats = get it out of their system, can also be changed to sow wild oats = causes some form of damage. At the end of the day, there isn’t a lot of concrete evidence on this topic, at least to my knowledg…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:07 AM
1

As a guy, I never understood this. The only reason I can think of, is that it’s mainly men with bigger penises who think that women will look at a big penis and want to have sex. But, since I’m not a woman, I can’t confirm this hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:49 PM
1

You literally just said that your memories with your children are better than your sex adventures, so clearly sex isn’t the pinnacle of human existence to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:04 PM
5

For a lot of men, it’s one of those things that is societally reinforced. If no woman has picked you, and you have genuinely put effort into dating, that’s ROUGH. Why has no woman picked you? Obviously we cannot answer for every individual as we would have to know them personally, but the most common reasons are looks (what blackpill focuses on) and personality (what bluepill focuses on). For some men, maybe they really just are incredibly ugly, and that may be the main reason they’ve never been…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:00 PM
1

Uh, what? Natural selection “made” humans smarter, and we used our intelligence to make weapons.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 08:03 PM
0

Nah, imma get myself a foreign wife lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 12:45 AM
1

Don’t listen to that guy. Never use a bigger dildo on your girl, that’s emasculating, and don’t let them call you insecure for that. There’s nothing wrong with her using a bigger dildo when she’s just using it on herself, but never use it on her, and definitely don’t wear a sleeve. If anything, use a cock ring to increase your girth during sex. If you wanna get a bigger dick, r/gettingbigger is where it’s at. Just be careful. Edit: “never” may be a little overboard, but if she wants you to use i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 11:54 PM
1

There are different lenses to view people through. There is the Human sense, a sexual sense, and a romantic sense among others. No amount of sexual partners, or lack thereof, lowers a human’s intrinsic value, but neither does any dating preference (height, race, weight, etc.). However, peoples behaviors or physical features can subjectively lower your sexual or romantic value. If you’re overweight, I see you as less desirable in a romantic and sexual sense, but that doesn’t affect how I would tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 11:41 PM
3

I don’t have any real life experiences, but that doesn’t mean I can’t be RP aware. That’s what YouTube is for.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 06:17 PM
-1

Nobody said it’s just candy crush, just that women play more casual games. Hell, even Pokémon has highly competitive tournaments, and most of the people I’ve seen on those events are still men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 09:31 AM
1

What if it’s a high end escort? Like those ones that charge 1500+ an hour and are obviously not being exploited by anyone? To me, the only reasoning that makes sense is if you know the guy paid an escort who is struggling financially. She would be consenting, but she’s only doing so because the other option is homelessness, which obviously brings in the question of what true consent is. However, a high end escort would negate this reasoning, as they would be doing so because they want to, not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 01:13 AM
2

https://areomagazine.com/2019/08/20/seven-key-misconceptions-about-evolutionary-psychology/ Go to misconception number four. Variation in human behavior across cultures doesn’t necessarily disprove an evolutionary explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:52 AM
2

Yeah, hot+smart>hot+dumb, but hot+average intelligence>average looks+smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:46 AM
-1

You know you can be unnecessarily argumentative, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:36 AM
1

Do you have a link to that post?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:35 AM
3

Are you making these men feel stupid for the sake of making them feel stupid, or was that simply a byproduct of you pointing out flawed reasoning? The former makes you an ass and of course someone wouldn’t want to be with you. The latter would just be their ego getting in the way. You could be with someone who is equally intelligent, but if you are unnecessarily competitive in regards to intelligence, it’s a turnoff, similar to when a man tries to prove he’s alpha. As for me personally, beauty i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:02 AM
1

A non-celebrity is just as capable of cheating I fundamentally disagree with this from a practical standpoint. If Jena was with an above average but not super high status man, he’d feel like he hit the fucking jackpot. He’d do everything he could to stay with her. Jason Derulo doesn’t feel like he hit the jackpot whatsoever. He has so many options, many of which are probably equally attractive or more attractive than she is. A lot of men are generally only as faithful as their options. Some abov…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:25 AM
1

No she wouldn’t, that’s the whole reason she ended up a single mom. She’s 29 years old and she’s in the industry, she should absolutely be aware of how high status men act, yet she chose one anyway. That fundamentally shows me that she deep down wants a man like Jason Derulo. Anything less in her mind is settling. If she does later choose another guy who isn’t as desirable as a celebrity, he won’t get her 100% burning desire. Maybe he’ll get 95%, but not the 100% desire that Jason Derulo receive…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:14 AM
1

Yeah, she wants to have the most desired man to herself, which isn’t going to happen. NFL and NBA players always step out on their wives, but they tolerate it because they know they’re the main chick. Jena Frumes doesn’t get to have her cake and eat it too. If she wants to have a man that is absolutely loyal to her, she can go with a man that is top 1% rather than top 0.01%, but she feels entitled to the top 0.01% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:06 AM
1

Yeah, because in her mind, she either wants the 0.001% of man or wants nobody. The average man is a lowly peasant to her in terms of SMV or RMV. Even an above average man has 0% chance with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 08:52 AM
1

Nope. That man who is raising another man’s children is not passing in his genes. The woman who is getting cheated on is still passing on her genes since she knows the kids is hers. She’s also getting an upper class lifestyle provided to her by her man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:32 AM
1

If she’s a very attractive woman, she would absolutely rather be with the rich, famous, and attractive guy. If she’s a very attractive woman and she’s famous like Jena Frumes? She wouldn’t even breathe in the same direction as an average man LMFAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:05 AM
1

You’re right, but that’s why you just don’t commit or go to a country where dating is much more conservative than the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 05:22 AM
1

That’s your POV, not hers. She sees lack of higher education as fundamentally incompatible with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:30 AM
1

I like you sticking up for your standards! All the people triggered that you require a college educated man is funny. Reminds me of the people who get triggered when I say I want a virgin lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:20 AM
1

Aw hell nah 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:12 AM
1

Same. I’m a guy and would never in a million years want to be a woman. If you exclude childbirth, in the west, men and women have different advantages, but I’d definitely still choose to be a man. Include childbirth/pregnancy, and women definitely have it worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:09 AM
1

Hmm, as someone who loves college football, the whole NIL and transfer portal thing has quite a few similarities to PPD discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 06:56 AM
1

I don’t use drugs, but I definitely would if I could leave this dimension.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 06:49 AM
1

God damn, oil companies don’t even pay that much for destroying our environment and poisoning people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 06:28 AM
1

How is it crazy that it’s the norm? I can’t see how a non-monogamous society would even function tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 06:11 AM
1

Or finding out a woman has slept around a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 03:57 AM
1

I don’t think you should tell your female family members to not have casual sex, but have a long discussion with them about what that entails. Some men will only want her for her body. Is she okay with that? Is she doing it because she genuinely wants to, or because of social/peer pressure? Also, this is not coercion in the west. It is coercion in extremist places like many Muslim countries, since those countries give actual punishments. Men not wanting to date you is not a punishment, unless yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 01:42 AM
2

If you critique a woman who only wants men above 6ft, you’ll be called an insecure manlet lolol. You may think it’s shallow and objectifying, but if it’s not immoral, it’s fair game. If a woman wants to date a man who makes 1 million + a year, who cares? She’s shallow but not immoral. Even if she sees him as nothing but a wallet (a success object), it doesn’t matter unless she’s making a prescriptive claim to other woman. I wouldn’t want to date a promiscuous woman, but that doesn’t mean I would…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 01:29 AM
2

Who cares? We don’t want promiscuous women, and they don’t want us.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 01:03 AM
2

I didn’t say that theocracies are a good thing. However, I see it as a win win. If I get a virgin wife, and give her a much better life than she could’ve had in Malaysia, we both benefit 🤷🏽‍♂️ Of course I’d like to see sharia law abolished tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:38 AM
3

sex out of wedlock* And I know. Malaysia is mostly a Muslim country, and even the modern cities there are still like 50% Muslim I believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:33 AM
3

Yeah, the only countries where it’s realistically possible to find a virgin woman is the Middle East or some countries in Asia. Everywhere else is basically not realistic. Maybe some parts of Africa as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:22 AM
4

Thank you. Yes, it gives a sense of self validation knowing that she’s only been with you and you alone. I know I don’t literally own her, but it still gives validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:17 AM
1

Sure, but just because our views may be “misogynistic” doesn’t mean we hate women. If I see sex as a sexual conquest and thus, a virgin as unconquered, yeah that’s weird, but it doesn’t mean I hate women. Same with guys who wanna sleep with as many women as possible because they feel like they’ve “conquered” a lot of women. It doesn’t mean they hate women, especially because that conquest thing only applies to sex. I may see sex as a conquest, but that doesn’t mean I think women shouldn’t have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:13 AM
1

I wouldn’t be surprised if your husband got approached in the past based on word of mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 12:04 AM
2

Malaysia is apparently 23, so I guess that’s the destination lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:58 PM
1

For some men, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:52 PM
0

You can learn with one person. Idk why people think you need to sleep with 25+ people to learn about sex
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:51 PM
0

Well yeah, but that could be due to many reasons, and if they can get it (probably won’t lol) then it’s fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:45 PM
2

I mean, there’s a penis size calculator if you wanna see the percentile 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:33 PM
5

5 is average if you assume a normal distribution. If that’s the case, you’re not a 5. Women who are average are going to get approached in some way, whether it be in person or online.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:30 PM
4

Lol this just isn’t true. The guy in question could absolutely get an LTR as long as he’s not completely broke. If women throw themselves at you sexually, there is going to be at least 1 who will want to stay with you. Even if that’s not the case tho, being alone doesn’t seem any different than being the guy who a woman settled for. In fact, the latter is worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:04 PM
6

Nothing, but we don’t want these women, just like these women probably don’t want us 🤷🏽‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:51 PM
27

This has to be a copypasta 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:26 AM
3

Well, let me ask you this: If I think women who abort babies are selfish murderers whom I would never be friends with, but still vote for abortion rights out of a purely consequentialist perspective (adoption/foster system is broken in the US, less crime down the road, makes women even more choosy, hopefully stupid people will get more abortions, less children suffering in poverty, etc.), would you still date me? Edit: the “makes women even more choosy” is more of a selfish thing than a societal…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:47 PM
1

Do you know about his sexual/romantic past? Was the woman he cheated with very attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:37 PM
2

Exactly. Like, I’m all for a good national healthcare system here in the US for everyone, higher taxes on the ultra rich, reduced cost of higher education (not free tho), but I’m against student loan forgiveness, torn on the abortion/gun debate, am also critical of Islam (just like any other religion), and lots more stuff. Also, from a dating perspective, apparently I hate women since I don’t want a women that has slept with more than 5 men (ideally a virgin). Like if you read the first few posi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:31 PM
1

Curious to know what you mean by “agree with Catholics on everything but god” and “agree with secularists on god but nothing else”. Like, do you think premarital sex is wrong for completely secular reasons? You think abortion is wrong from a purely scientific reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:19 PM
1

This is why you should have these conversations at the beginning of the relationship. If you care about politics, religion, kids, etc, then have this conversation at the beginning, rather than wasting time. Hell, I even say to have this conversation at the beginning if you care about body count. I don’t know how common it was in the real world, but apparently women on TwoX were breaking up with their boyfriends because the BF was indifferent to Roe V Wade overturn, or even supported it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:13 PM
4

Sadly a lot of us men who want a women you’re describing, will probably have to go abroad. “Passport bros” is the name.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:54 PM
2

“Women should stop sleeping with so many men” is the ideal RP world, while the “women should put out for you asap” is the ideal RP personal world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:45 PM
1

Except no reasonable person is telling women to sleep with men because “society will collapse”. The reasonable solution is to have a society in which much more people are fit, watch less porn, are more social, etc. This way, young men and women are more attractive in general, and will get together more often due to socializing. Don’t get me wrong, society might very well collapse, but the main reason isn’t because men are virgins lol. Hell, that might just be a symptom rather than a cause. I do …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:13 PM
3

Gonna need a citation and even then, how the fuck did they determine this was cause rather than correlation?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:01 PM
1

I can only speak for myself, but physical features for me is an absolutely wide range. Anything from pale to dark skin, short to tall (not taller than 6ft tho), long hair to medium length hair, curly/wavy/curly is all sexy, all hair colors, all boob sizes, petite/slimthick, etc etc. However, just because I find a wide range of physical features attractive, doesn’t mean I consider them equally attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 07:24 AM
-1

It’s absolutely ok to demand it, as long as you realize that you aren’t entitled to it, as well as realizing that it heavily limits your options. Women can do whatever they want with their bodies, but so can men (refuse to date said women). Also, if women REALLY didn’t care, they wouldn’t care if their partner asked, nor would they lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:03 PM
1

You dropped this 👑
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 08:02 AM
2

1) is it not the opposite? Environment determines range, your genetics determines where you fall on the range? 2) I agree. People who say that they definitely know that something is either nature or nurture, annoy me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 07:54 AM
1

It’s the view of sex The latter person doesn’t view sex as something between people who love each other and are in an LTR. They think of it as just another bodily function like eating or shitting. The former, well it’s hard to tell. If she only does LTR’s and doesn’t engage in casual sex, then she has a romantic view of sex. Neither view is better than the other. They’re just different views.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:17 AM
1

What is this reply? OP (u/take_number_two ) said she had the best sex during her casual sex phase. Not only did she engage in casual sex, she says it ruined her because she’ll apparently never experience it again and no future guy will compare. Where did you get the idea that she missed out on casual sex? Or am I missing something here?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:09 AM
2

Not OP, but any preference is fine as long as you aren’t shaming other people. Refusing to date a highly experienced or inexperienced person isn’t shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:59 AM
2

Although I agree, this could be said of anything. People who play video games too much, watch too much porn, drink too much alcohol, use too many drugs, spend too much time on social media… and so much more. The world is an incredibly complex and interconnected place, especially in 2022. Even if you could hypothetically simulate a bunch of different versions of society and objectively find the one that gave the most long term fulfillment/happiness, as well as being sustainable, would it be ethic…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:56 AM
2

The US is too powerful and geographically isolated to be taken over by even Russia and China combined. Luckily for those countries, we’ll wipe each other out and they’ll third party us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:50 AM
1

I mean, I know I sound like a doomer here, but humanity was probably fucked from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:29 AM
2

To be fair, it’s basically impossible to tell if a lot of things are Nature (biological) vs Nurture (cultural). Do women prefer taller men because of biology or culture, or both? If it’s both, what’s the split? Do some men prefer low n count because of biology or culture, or both? If it’s both, what’s the split? These questions are not possible to definitely answer in an ethical manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:24 AM
4

Ah yes, if you don’t want a woman that has slept around, you must not respect women 🙄 I swear, when a man expresses that he wants a low body count or virgin, lots of women will treat him like he’s David Parker Ray
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:20 AM
4

If only more people thought like this. Never understood people who lie because “it shouldn’t matter”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:15 AM
3

Ok but let’s be honest, if this guy truly cared about body count and thinks that number is high, he should’ve asked when they were in the dating stage. This is why I personally don’t like the “ignorance is bliss” thing, as once you find out, you’re gonna question yourself and your relationship. There are a few things that will probably happen at that point 1) He has to learn to grow past it, which might require therapy and/or couples counseling. If/when his wife finds out he has a problem with i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 04:56 AM
2

Exactly. I hate when people describe their quality as some objective quality. I’m a virgin and want a virgin. Anything else is not quality. For some women, my being a virgin itself makes me not quality. For some men, a virgin woman would be not quality. Different strokes for different folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 04:29 AM
1

Hence why I said “if that’s the only reason”.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 12:27 AM
1

Well yeah, it’s obviously expensive and there are better uses for money, but it’s not different from a relationship from a monetary aspect. Taking a woman out for a date, buying her gifts, planning a trip, etc. all take money. I’m just pointing it out because if someone’s only reason for not wanting an escort is because of exploitation or trafficking, there are ways to ensure you aren’t contributing to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:23 PM
1

I could’ve sworn that Germany or some Nordic country made sex work legal, yet the rate of human trafficking actually increased.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:04 PM
-1

Ehh, there are plenty of escorts that do just fine for themselves, charging high rates that go 1500+ an hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 10:52 PM
1

Virgins could also love me and non-virgins could also not love me… Also, like I said, the virgin allows me to have both.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 12:07 AM
1

Nah, the virgin allows me to have both, and I don’t want to fall in love with a woman who isn’t a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:40 PM
1

Having a woman that’s only been with me gives me the same sense of status that sleeping with many woman does. When you sleep with many woman, you prove that you are sexually valuable. With a virgin woman that is attractive, it’s the same thing. No man in the world except me would be able to truthfully claim he slept with her. No man has a video of her, no man can tell his friends that he slept with her, only you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:05 PM
1

Throw hands with whom? The cheater or the blonde? Yeah, what the blonde did was messed up, but the cheater is the one who broke his heart and his trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 09:15 AM
3

Nah, you’re fine. Don’t take the answers from men on PPD too personal lol. I’m sure your husband loves you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 08:58 AM
1

I mean, as long as the LTR is with a virgin, then give me the LTR. If it’s not, give me the empty endless sex
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 08:26 AM
1

Parasocial relationships like onlyfans are not only fake, but drain you of money and time. Instead of improving yourself, you’re sold a false dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 07:58 AM
0

I’ve said the same thing so many times in the past on this sub. How you say something absolutely matters, and it’s so weird when other men say it doesn’t. If I wanted you to move out of my way, I’d politely say “excuse me” or “could you let me pass?” I would not say “move out of my way” Even thought they convey the same end goal, they are drastically different.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 06:18 AM
1

No, using toys with other people, not yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:50 PM
1

I’m not saying I would want this to be a thing 🙄 It’s just something that made me laugh while I was watching the interview, but wanted to know what PPD thinks the outcomes would be if it was a thing. Some people think it would increase shaming, some people think it will decrease shaming, and others think it will eventually be meaningless after the shock value wears off.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:44 AM
2

Should’ve made it clear, but in this hypothetical scenario, it’s a sorta supernatural thing that only affects 18+ year olds. So when you turn 18, your number is seen and you are able to see the number of other 18+ year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:36 AM
2

Nah, what you’re describing would mainly affect religious people. Most people aren’t seeking virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:29 AM
1

I mean, some women sure, but I don’t think it would be the majority by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:27 AM
3

I like what you said about men’s body counts. Lots of guys think women don’t care, or that more is better, but that’s not necessarily true. A lot of women want a guy that you’re describing: sought after but he doesn’t necessarily explore all his options. It’s the same with men. A lot of men want a women who is sought after but is low n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:23 AM
1

Interesting perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 09:19 AM
1

If someone, usually family/friends, know you haven’t ever had a relationship or haven’t had sex, they usually start to ask why and if you want one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 06:42 AM
5

Nah, the number would only be different sexual partners, so if a person cheats with a past partner, it wouldn’t change.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 06:09 AM
6

You think men are too desperate? You don’t think a man would turn down a woman with 20+?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:16 AM
0

As a virgin guy, I wouldn’t care about how people see my zero tbh. Also, I don’t think most women would just stop having relationships and wait for marriage, although that number would probably increase slightly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:14 AM
1

Because this is a sub about relationship and sexual dynamics, hence the terms RMV and SMV. Your human value is not the same thing as your RMV, which isn’t the same thing as your SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:44 AM
13

That’s an interesting hypothetical as well tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:06 AM
2

1) people ask “don’t you want a partner” all the time. 2) others have said that they think this would actually make society less shaming of promiscuity since the information would be public and people would eventually conclude that it isn’t a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:03 AM
9

No, since the intent would count. Rape is against a woman’s wishes, so it’s not something she is choosing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:56 AM
0

1) Rape isn’t sex and wouldn’t count. 2) To correct this, since I knew someone would make a bizarre scenario about children, this info would be for anyone 18+ and about anyone 18+. So the moment you turn 18, your number is seen and you can now see anyones number who is also above 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:52 AM
7

You are correct in that this is a tricky thing. As I said in another comment, this hypothetical is a supernatural force or being that would determine this stuff. So you can’t really trick it by just soaking like Mormons do (lol). I guess this being would also base it off of your intent? To me, it seems impossible that you would stick your penis in a woman’s vagina unless you are intending to be sexual about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:45 AM
4

Nope, see edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:38 AM
6

I guess I should’ve made it more clear, but in this case, it would be anything sex related (blowjobs, handjobs, PIV, Anal) and would also be for everyone regardless of sexual orientation. Orgasm is a more difficult question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:32 AM
1

Tough situation, because you’re right about the practicality of it. However, I’m definitely not putting my life on the line while other people (especially rich people) aren’t. Fuck that shit, I value my life more than random peoples, especially if they get to live at my expense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:26 AM
4

I guess this hypothetical would be like a supernatural thing, rather than something you make public yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:56 AM
3

So “real life” just begins when you’re over 25 🥴 The whole “[insert age] is not an adult” is just nonsense. Also, if college isn’t real life, then neither is being 85+, since your life is basically set in stone at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:44 AM
4

Even the stuff going on in Iran… Pretty sure most men can realize the need for feminism in the Middle East, where women are ACTUALLY seen as property.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:38 AM
3

Bro what? College quite literally is real life, it’s just a different stage of life where priorities are different due to the time we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:33 AM
1

Ok, but this isn’t just a post about “n count matters because…” or “n count doesn’t matter because…”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:06 AM
1

Well yes, but until then, it’s his house.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 06:56 AM
6

Did he give an example of a rule? I feel like everyone has rules. Just some possible ones: No drugs No alcohol No guns No shoes on in house None of the above seem like some red flags to me, especially depending on the culture/environment people were raised in.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 10:23 AM
1

Teachers can be a wide range of ages. I’ve had teachers as young as 25 and as old as 65.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 06:45 PM
1

Ok? Women are throwing hissy fits at body count, so what’s your point? Men and women need to just accept preferences of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 06:40 PM
1

I mean, women have similar preferences in that regard. Zodiac signs come to mind. Education level is also the same. Some women won’t go out with a blue collar worker, even if he makes decent money. We don’t tell women that they should give up that preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 07:00 AM
2

It’s not a perfect analogy, but it’s kinda like having something named after you in science. A unit of force is called a Newton and will forever be called a Newton. In microbiology, the gram stain is the most famous staining method and will forever be called the gram stain. That’s the kinda way I would feel with having a virgin women. I know it sounds shitty, but it’s not coming from a place of malice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 04:35 AM
2

To me, if you had to make me choose, it makes more sense to judge based on things you choose, rather than things that can’t be changed. But I understand some people feel it’s the opposite. However, they both should be equal (I.e doesn’t matter if it’s physical or some choice).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:39 AM
2

Last sentence is true. A preference is fine as long as you don’t shame those who don’t fit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:36 AM
3

Except in 2022, especially in America, protection isn’t needed. A 5’0 100 pound woman with a Glock is gonna beat a 6’5 220 pound man any day of the weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:34 AM
1

Well that “conquered” thing is true for me, but not because of some perceived unfairness. I would want my wife to be mine and mine alone. Some men take pride in sleeping with a lot of women. I would take pride in having a women that’s only mine. Some say both are equally problematic as it reduces women down to trophies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:29 AM
1

They say that all the time 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:23 AM
4

This never made sense to me. Wouldn’t you wanna be with a guy who didn’t care? Why would you want to be with a guy who would be disgusted by your past?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:11 AM
2

I’m the same way lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 03:05 AM
5

It’s hard to find out ethically, but it’s best to just be honest about the fact that you don’t want to be with a promiscuous person. If only women were honest with their body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 02:58 AM
0

It’s a shame that some people won’t date outside their race It’s a shame that some women won’t date short men It’s shame… [insert preference] So what if it’s “a shame”?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:55 AM
1

Again, you’re conflating human value with personal views of relationship value. I don’t care that my waitress or doctor has sex, I’m not disgusted by that. Similarly, women who don’t date short men wouldn’t care if a waiter or a store clerk is short. However, for a relationship, they might not date short men. Some men, including myself, are disgusted if their potential wife has slept around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:42 AM
1

Well, it’s all subjective, but if we wanted to be objective, we’d need to look at statistics. Same for me tho, above 0 Is a no go
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:26 AM
21

It’s comedic af
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:19 AM
3

I mean, they’re just saying that out of desperation. I would personally benefit from such a culture, but I understand that people should be allowed to make their own choices in a free country, even if I don’t like those choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:15 AM
11

I don’t view you as less of a person for sleeping around. I don’t personally view you as relationship material if you’ve slept around, but that doesn’t mean other men don’t. Some guys will genuinely not care, some will operate under “ignorance is bliss”, some will prefer a high n count women, and some men even want to be cucks. All of those are valid, including my personal preference. It doesn’t mean that I hate women or see them as not people. Just to make this obvious: I’m sure women who date …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:11 AM
1

I’ve rarely seen people online saying they want virgin men. In fact, it’s usually the opposite. “He’s too inexperienced” or “He won’t last long”.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:07 AM
1

Better to be alone than to settle and lower your standards 🤷🏽‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:05 AM
1

FUCKING YES! Holy shit. dating preferences don’t need to be justified since they are part of your own bodily autonomy. This isn’t like convincing your parents on why they should buy you a PC or some shit. And I agree with your reasoning. For me personally, it doesn’t matter if you are some 10/10 IG model. If a bunch of guys have been inside you, I automatically find you not relationship material. That’s my own personal opinion tho. Some guys don’t care, some guys prefer a slut (not using that in…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:04 AM
1

This comment, especially the second paragraph, is nothing but facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 12:06 AM
1

This comment is right on the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:44 PM
1

Yeah, I’d dodge too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:35 PM
1

+1 for boxing or MMA. I really need to get back into that. That feeling of punching someone and getting punched back is so amazing. Only problem is that it takes a LOT of time and dedication to even become mediocre. It’s also extremely expensive (gyms around me cost 150 a month), which makes it not worth it, especially if you can only go to 2 classes a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 10:30 AM
1

I can only speak for myself, but I don’t mind being “boyfriend/husband” material, if the women is what I consider wife material.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 10:10 AM
3

Nah, it’s one of the many requirements. If you’re a virgin but an airhead, that ain’t gonna fly. If you’re a virgin but not attractive, that ain’t gonna fly. If you’re attractive but not a virgin, also ain’t gonna fly. Just like women tell other women, don’t lower your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 09:26 AM
5

Obviously I don’t know your conversations, but these men might not be intimidated by you “outsmarting” them, but rather that they think you are trying to outsmart them (i.e competing with them). That’s a very subtle, but important difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 09:16 AM
1

The average is the sum divided by n. So let’s say you have 10 men, and 9 have slept with 1 women, while the 10th has slept with 51 women. This means that the men have slept with a total of 60 women, and if you divide that by 10, you get 6. So the average number of women slept with is 6, but that isn’t representative of the majority. In this case, the median would be more representative, which would be 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 07:38 PM
1

It’s pretty intuitive, but we can’t really know either way
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 08:04 AM
1

I’d say 10-15 is the average, but the average is not representative of the median. Median is probably like 5-7
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 08:01 AM
1

Lol only 5% of women get married as virgins, so it’s definitely not a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:55 AM
1

No, it’s absolutely not. Your life has no intrinsic value, just like mine doesn’t. However, even if I were to concede the point, it doesn’t matter since it’s a preference. A man’s height doesn’t have some intrinsic value, so a women shouldn’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:37 AM
2

Good post
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:48 AM
1

Society and existence don’t have intrinsic value either… There is nothing in the universe with intrinsic value.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:45 AM
1

I mean, human life is the same way. Humans don’t have intrinsic value, the universe doesn’t give a shit about us, but that doesn’t mean you can’t place subject value on certain things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:21 AM
3

I mean, it just depends. If I live in California, am young and poor, it’s not very good. For people who already live in the area, it’s good.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:18 AM
4

Idk if that makes it better or worse lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:09 AM
3

5% of women marry as virgins, which isn’t a lot. Then you have the small percentage that might claim to be virgins, but are actually born again virgins. That’s also just one requirement. She’s got to be good looking, smart, kind, etc. So the percentage is even smaller than 5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:44 AM
9

Only 5% of women nowadays get married as virgins, so statistics were not exactly on your side, from a man’s perspective. However, even though women often lie about their body count, I doubt many would lie about being a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:34 AM
6

That’s just like, your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 09:50 AM
1

Nah, RP freed me mentally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 10:51 AM
1

22m here and same position as you. Parents just bring it up jokingly, but you know what they say, every joke has (at least) a grain of truth to it. My parents care, but not to an extreme degree that makes them upset or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 03:57 AM
1

So, you’re a misanthrope?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 01:01 AM
2

No, being husband material for a women we consider wife material is not a bad thing. Lots of men would happily wait for marriage if the person was a virgin/low body count. They probably wouldn’t want to wait for marriage if the women has slept with 20 different dudes, many of them being ONS on tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 12:47 AM
1

Or disgust
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 12:37 AM
2

That’s different
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 09:39 PM
3

Exactly. I’d like to be husband material for what I consider to be a wife material women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 09:36 PM
4

It’s not a guarantee tho. Some OF models and strippers can have relatively low body counts, and some nurses/doctors can have very high ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:12 PM
1

Used to be, but not anymore. Nowadays I’m agnostic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:55 PM
1

Hmm, forcing people to work against their will and torturing them, is similar to having a preference for non-promiscuous women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:44 PM
–

Ignorance is bliss =/= don’t care. If you showed him a video of his wife getting a train ran on her, he’s probably gonna feel some type of way lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:41 PM
–

You can have as much fun as you want, just like a man can reject you for it. They are both equally valid choices at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:38 PM
1

Well, we don’t know if sleeping around is overall beneficial or harmful. Kinda hard to prove. With food, if you have an excess, you become a fatty, so we know an excess of food is bad for health. It’s hard to tell for promiscuity tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:36 PM
–

Obviously you’re allowed to call it out, but that doesn’t mean your opinion is absolute. Just because you call it misogyny, doesn’t mean it’s misogyny. If a white man only dated white women, that doesn’t mean he’s racist, even if someone were to say they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:34 PM
1

Yeah, I was gonna say you have to double that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:18 PM
1

Samesies
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:17 PM
1

With another virgin that I marry. If I can’t find her, then I’ll die a virgin. Not a big deal really.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:15 PM
1

We can’t be certain of that tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 07:52 PM
1

Except the people who reproduce most are the poorest and dumbest…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 07:18 PM
6

You’re spitting facts lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:07 AM
1

Source? I have a hard time believing the average is 8 for Gen Z or millennials.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:34 AM
1

To be fair, a lot of us guys would rather stay single than being with a 304
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:50 AM
1

I mean, women are the selectors of sex at the end of the day. Men ask, women allow (at least most of the time)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:40 AM
1

It is absolutely becoming more popular, and we don’t know how popular it actually is. Many guys like me may have redpill beliefs, but would NEVER in a million years talk about it in public. It’s kinda like prepping. The number one rule of prepping is to never tell someone else that you prep.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:00 AM
1

Redpill men aren’t a monolith. Some decide that women aren’t worth it and go monk mode (MGTOW). Some decide to never commit to a woman, become the most attractive person they can become, and have sex with as much different women as possible. Some want to go for low n count/virgin women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:58 AM
1

I’m sure the guy she had a threesome with and never wanted to see again, had an amazing personality, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:54 AM
1

Where do you live? Because I need to move there ASAP
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:33 AM
1

I mean, you don’t know me lol. Your relationship isn’t stronger just because it’s your offspring. Your love isn’t stronger just because it’s your offspring. I think that’s a ridiculous thing to say tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 08:19 PM
1

I’m a virgin guy and would only want to be with a virgin women, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t want to please her. However, given that most people aren’t virgins now, it probably won’t happen, and that’s perfectly ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 11:49 PM
3

I am also not a catch and a weirdo, but I definitely do care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 11:34 PM
1

I’ve had that feeling with my younger siblings. I helped raise my sister, and those were the best moments of my life. I don’t need children of my own to have a good life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 11:28 PM
3

Lots of people (men and women) operate under the whole idea of “ignorance is bliss”. He may not care if he doesn’t know, but if he saw a video of you getting a train ran on you, he probably would feel some type of way. In that sense, I think he probably does care to an extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 11:25 PM
5

Lmao this is bullshit. I’m a guy and I have no such instinct to protect any adult, man or woman, that is not related to me. I will admit I have an instinct to protect children, but I would hope that the majority of people have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 08:29 PM
1

Yeah, that’s pretty messed up lol. I’d just never settle and use escorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 10:55 AM
3

Which doesn’t even make any sense. It doesn’t matter what incels say on their forums about how they hate women. If a 10/10 women flirted with an incel, the incel would probably nut instantly. They definitely wouldn’t deny sex lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:19 PM
2

Not OP but I am and I feel the same way. To me tho, relationships and sex aren’t that important to my life. I’m ok with dying a virgin and alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 09:27 PM
2

The problem to me isn’t necessarily the view, but being in an echo chamber like that. This isn’t just dating. The incel movement was originally nothing like it is today. I imaging FDS was the same way. However, r/childfree and r/dogfree are the same way. There is nothing wrong with not wanting a dog or chid, but when you are in an echo chamber like that, it eventually turns to hatred of dogs and children. Similarly, there is nothing wrong with not wanting a high N count women, but it can lead to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 09:25 PM
6

Desperation is insane. I’d rather die a lonely virgin than be with a high N count women, no matter how hot she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 09:17 PM
2

Honestly, I’m just apathetic towards life at this point. Don’t really give a shit about anything except living an easy, chill life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/22 01:19 AM
7

Who is BLAMING feminists? People are just saying that feminism is only capable of happening on a large scale during peacetime, and that feminists are trying to have all the exact same rights as men, but having less responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:59 PM
1

Maybe it should 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:02 AM
1

Also, if a man dodges the draft and does breed later on, his decision to dodge actually allowed him to breed, and the other guy going to war and dying prevented himself from passing on his genes…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:46 AM
1

Lmao I would dodge a draft so fast
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:41 AM
2

It’s the fucking elite man. While we argue about every single thing in the media, they laugh and hide.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:31 AM
1

Using biology as your justification is… not something I thought I’d hear from women considering that women have been abused throughout history due to their biology. But let’s argue this. 1) This is a very extreme scenario. This argument really only works if there are a small amount of people, like tribes. Ukraine has about 24 million females and 20 million males. I don’t even think more than 5k Ukrainians have died and it’s been almost a month of war during the most technologically advanced time…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 04:43 AM
10

1) It was enacted by the political elite, not the average man. Putin was the one who started the war, so I’m not gonna blame some random man in some middle of nowhere Russian town, just because they happen to be the same gender and live in the same country. 2) Why don’t we apply this to other areas? Men built the world. Men made democracy and made voting. Does that mean that women should not be able to vote because men made it? Men built academic institutions, and women were not allowed in Scien…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 04:27 AM
2

Damn, I never thought of it like this 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:08 AM
1

Well, assuming we treat them “equally,” the reason men judge a woman for it is because, you know, they’re dating women? You can view a man with a high N count as disgusting, but you aren’t gonna care as much because you’re not dating him. People hold their friends and partners to different standards in different areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 05:53 AM
1

She should not be negatively judged as a human, but dating is a whole different thing. Some women don’t like men under 6 feet, and that’s perfectly okay, but does that mean she thinks men under 6 feet are less valuable as human? I’d hope not. Less valuable for romance? Yeah, or else she wouldn’t have that preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 05:49 AM
1

People are allowed to have their preferences
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 03:27 AM
1

Yeah, there is nothing morally wrong with sex. Just like there is nothing morally wrong with short men, overweight people, ugly people, etc. and yet those are allowed for preferences. People are allowed to have their preferences. Hell, you could even say “I won’t date someone who likes the color yellow” and that’s still a perfectly valid preference. You don’t have to justify them. They are a person’s preferences. Women be out here rejecting people because of their astrology sign lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 03:08 AM
2

Oh, but women complain about “locker room talk” lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 02:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter