TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Altazar Archive

View 12 posts and 22 comments by Altazar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

Altazar/r/MensRights11/06/10 09:53 PM
24

Altazar/r/MensRights19/06/10 01:03 AM
20

Altazar/r/MensRights17/06/10 10:54 PM
13

Altazar/r/MensRights01/07/10 08:06 AM
10

Altazar/r/MensRights22/06/10 10:59 PM
7

Altazar/r/MensRights29/06/10 06:29 PM
4

Altazar/r/MensRights19/06/10 12:50 AM
4

Altazar/r/MensRights04/08/10 05:44 AM
2

Altazar/r/MensRights29/07/10 05:59 PM
2

Altazar/r/MensRights22/06/10 02:59 AM
0

Altazar/r/MensRights14/07/10 08:34 PM
0

Altazar/r/MensRights06/07/10 09:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

In short, almost everything that's publicized about DV - from public discourse to "treatment" - is either factually incorrect or based on flawed intellectual constructs. It's based, not on fact or reasoned opinion, but on the political ideology of groups with a frankly-expressed anti-male animus.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 04:22 PM
4

'normal' or 'legitimate' warfare picks out and slaughters all the healthiest and bravest of the young male population.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:21 AM
0

The author does NOT clearly state that it's the PRIMARY reason. Many other factors are at play. ignatiusloyola wrote: The author quite clearly stated that the primary reason...
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:44 AM
4

the article and ignored the bit where it says "because they're expected to be primary childcare providers." The article does not say "because they're expected to be primary childcare providers."- you made it up. It's a verifiable fact, that your "quoted" text does not appear in the article. HPLovecraft - you have been caught lying. And on top of that lie, HPLovecraft, you are also guilty of falsely accusing me of ignoring non-existent statement in the article. Your attempt to divert the discussi…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:31 AM
-1

The author quite clearly stated that the primary reason .... No, it's a fact that the author did not state that this is the primary reason, HPLovecraft did, HPLovecraft made it up and lied that her fabrication is a quote from the author. It's an easily verifiable fact that HPLovecraft quoted text "because they're expected to be primary childcare providers." does not appear in the article - it's a HPLovercraft fabrication, a lie used by HPLovercraft to divert the discussion and blame the messenge…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:15 AM
2

I do not agree with your, HPLovecraft, hostile anti mens rights statement: So if a man wants to have kids ever, he should also not be allowed into med school.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:20 AM
1

Fact is , that those are quotes. The quotes are open for discussion. Posting factual quotes in itself is not bias. I have not expressed opinions about those quotes. HPLovecraft, is attempting to bully members of this subreddit with shaming language and HPLovecraft is spewing the following non sequitur feminazi garbage: So if a man wants to have kids ever, he should also not be allowed into med school.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:06 AM
2

What kind of feminist are you to dictate to this subreddit what it is(should be) advocating? It's a fact that men rights people are different and advocate different things. HPLovecraft, you are "shooting men" in this subreddit by using shaming language against this subreddit members for them quoting factual research.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 08:48 AM
3

This subreddit mainly advocates the option of parental leave, not an obligation.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 08:32 AM
-1

So if a man wants to have kids ever, he should also not be allowed into med school. You are spewing feminazi garbage in this subreddit. It's a quote, not "this subreddit advocating".
/r/MensRights04/08/10 07:29 AM
2

"There's this sense that we're having a doctor shortage, so why should we let all these women into medical school who will take maternity leave and not work as hard anyway?" she says. "I actually think it's true." Amy says she plans to have children of her own - but keeps those plans hidden from her supervisor for fear they might be held against her.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 06:02 AM
4

Like her husband, she's a family doctor; and like her husband, she's a faculty member at Newfoundland's Memorial University. Since the couple's youngest daughter was born, Goodridge has kept part-time hours to be closer to their four kids. Her husband, Dr. Scott Moffatt, works up to 50 hours a week - about five times as much as his wife. While Moffatt has risen through the ranks (he was promoted to undergraduate director of family medicine in September), Goodridge's own career has languished. Sh…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 06:01 AM
5

Women take more days off, too. In 2006, female health care workers missed an average of 13.1 workdays, 6.7 more than men in the field. A CIHI analysis of these figures reads: "The gender of the worker was one of the most important characteristics by which absenteeism rates differed.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 05:54 AM
3

Rebutt those negative assumptions with evidence.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:56 AM
0

inconsequential topic Mutilating infants genitals without consent is not an inconsequential topic.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 08:38 AM
1

Write letters of complaint to the Advertising Standards Bureau (www.adstandards.com.au). You can complain if an ad violates Section 2.1 of the Australian Association of National Advertisers code of ethics which states: "Advertising or Marketing Communications shall not portray people or depict material in a way which discriminates against or vilifies a person or section of the community on account of race, ethnicity, nationality, sex, age, sexual preference, religion, disability or political bel…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 09:06 PM
1

It's better to have mandatory DNA paternity testing for each child, if the potential father is available.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 09:58 PM
2

Not only did we destroy our sexual, intellectual, and traditional ideas, we destroyed our identities as women and the culture surrounding us. The fruits of feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 11:57 PM
1

Gender is a factor in use of health care services. From your last comment, it looks that you will also be in favor of charging higher health insurance premiums for women, because of women heavier use of health care services compared to men.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 11:38 PM
1

A TV warranty with the same coverage is an identical product, no matter who buys it - a man or a woman and despite the fact that each TV repair cost is different. If two women buy the same product(identical car insurance coverage), and both women have separate car accidents - although the company's liabilities are different for each womans' accident, it does not follow that the women are buying different product. In short, you have committed the logical fallacy Non sequitur(does not follow): alt…
/r/MensRights29/06/10 08:53 PM
0

Your analogy fails, because for car insurance men and women are paying for the identical car insurance, while for haircuts - they are paying for completely different things(man-style haircut vs. women-style haircut).
/r/MensRights29/06/10 08:16 PM
1

It's not the same reason, because most women don't pay for simple men-style haircut. (men and women in this case are paying for different things: short hair man-style haircut and long hair women-style haircut)
/r/MensRights29/06/10 06:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter