| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Androphobia: An abnormal and persistent fear of menI don't think we should replace Misandry with Androphobia. Androphobia would be something that is caused by misandrist propaganda, but most of the vocal anti-male feminist seem like they truly hate men. Women who believe them and their propaganda might become androphobic. Also I think the -phobia terms might be a bit overused and sometimes it really is just hate and no clinical phobia. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/15 12:56 AM |
| 1 | Will Men's Rights Be Next?I mean if you say you hate them why are you dedicating half of the subreddit to photos of them? Because they want to mock them. They do hate them, but hate can also be an obsession (but featured with comments below it like "Argh man I can't look at that obeast" makes it just look childish). Nonetheless many of them just seem like idiots, but really looking at HAES bullshit it can't be blamed that also a backlash against their bullshit evolves. The tour they are no going with exposing fat people … | /r/MensRights | 11/06/15 02:19 PM |
| 4 | Will Men's Rights Be Next?^ That ^ I was a few times there and commented a bit. The thing is I never hated fat people just for being fat more or less just for this Fat Acceptance and HAES bullshit I came to even know of the sub. I think many people on there a often as delusional as the people who go to an alcoholic or drug-addict and just say to them "It is so easy, you just have to stop drinking yourself to death." Really I think HAES and Fat Acceptance are utter bullshit and should be banned like anorexic models or tob… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/15 12:03 PM |
| 1 | Will Men's Rights Be Next?Nazis should never be censored Furthermore censoring people allows them to put up strawmen to push themselves into the corner of the seemingly oppressed. Open dialogue in which both sides are involved is in my opinion the only way to solve problems. When you allow one side to enclose itself or enclose it, it will create echochambers. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/15 11:54 AM |
| 0 | Outrage over "naked" lady ad on bus, a lot of people ignore that bus company also ran a naked man adPreach it! | /r/MensRights | 15/05/15 09:35 PM |
| 8 | Suzanne Venker: "Why men won't marry you."I think our society has too much become infatuated with the ideal of romantic love, that basically marriage has to become something like an everlasting honeymoon. Its easy to blame the media and the rise of online dating for this development, but it has definitely something to do with that. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/15 04:39 PM |
| 2 | Why Yes Can Mean No (She said yes, with "no coercion, no imminent threat of violence, no inebriation", but it was still rape.)Tough she will most likely vote for Hillary an the sole basis because she is a woman. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/15 02:30 PM |
| 3 | A female physician had an affair with a male physician. No intercourse took place, only oral sex. She secretly took the sperm from her cheeks to impregnate herself. She later sued for child support and won.Didn't something similar already happen with some german athlet? | /r/MensRights | 08/05/15 12:11 PM |
| 1 | Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminatedOkay thanks. In german it would make sense to put the verb in front (Bringt euch denn Hollywoody garnichts mehr bei) was the sentence I was the sentence I was thinking of and the same structure sounded just right for me (Ignoring the fact that in english the Syntax is more important since the grammatical function of a word isn't determined by conjugation) | /r/MensRights | 04/05/15 12:32 AM |
| 1 | Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminatedAre you mocking my comment? Just to ask, does the sentence sound off? because english isn't my first language. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/15 01:15 PM |
| 11 | Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminatedGerman or Germanic? Because the English, Dutch and Scandinavians are also Germanic, but they aren't evil, or are they? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/15 01:21 PM |
| 45 | Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminatedEvil people doing evil things because they are evil, doesn't teach hollywood you anything anymore? Source: am white german and male, clearly evil. No seriously believing that human rights can be violated for a good cause is unacceptable. They are human rights, not men's rights or women's rights. Limiting these rights for one gender doesn't make them Human rights anymore. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/15 12:06 PM |
| 3 | This Stock Photo Would Be Spark Outrage if Genders Were ReversedThats what I meant... it is true that if the genders would be reverse this image would be seen as totally oppressive and glorifying domestic abuse, while this format is totally acceptable. Really if you think a stock photo oppresses you then there is something wrong with your movement. And this was refering feminists, but yeah easely mistunderstandable because I think both versions should be acceptable because it is a goddamn stock photo. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/15 08:12 PM |
| -1 | This Stock Photo Would Be Spark Outrage if Genders Were ReversedSadly it would be so true. Really if you think a stock photo oppresses you then there is something wrong with your movement. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/15 06:18 PM |
| 13 | Walk a Mile, Part IIIsn't wearing High Heels to demonstrate hardships a bit stupid? Seriously it is not healthy to do hard work wearing High Heels and most women I know wear normal shoes to work (Except those working in an office). So you should wear shoes in which you don't do anything hard to experience hardships... thats somehow illogical. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/15 02:32 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter