TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Altered_Beast805 Archive

View 0 posts and 179 comments by Altered_Beast805 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Yet men make up almost 90% of murderers. Meh, women are much more likely to murder children and the weak/elderly than men. These murders are much harder to detect, let alone convict, so it may be a wash or maybe even lean towards women. We already know that women are more likely to abuse their domestic partner than men, it's not much of a jump from abuse to murder when it comes to those who can't protect themselves from abusive women.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:48 AM
-1

The teen pregnancy rate in 1960 was 96.3, in 2018 its 17.4. This conveniently leaves out marital statistics. I'm not talking about married couples that want to get pregnant. And it's substantially lower in high schools with comprehensive sex Ed. Same issue. But also leaves out abortions. I didn't say that sex education is grooming. I said LGBT education is grooming. Because it is. You've been debunked! Google didn't back up your religion.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:28 PM
-4

Anal/fallatio isn't exclusive to LGBT But it's adult content, which is the whole point of this post. It's been proven that sex education reduces the rate of teen pregnancy, This is definitely not true. Rates have skyrocketed since the 60's. STDs and helps encourage kids to report sexual abuse. This can be covered by basic human anatomy/physiology courses that avoid the grooming.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:52 PM
-5

Teaching kids basic human reproductive anatomy and physiology is important. Teaching butt stuff and felatio/cunnilingus for "inclusivity" is just grooming. Puberty reveals many more things that have gone wrong with normal development than just sexual deviancy.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:41 PM
-3

Redpill is just advanced Civics, which should be taught to high schoolers. Feminism is religion and should be treated as such. LGBTQAP etc is adult content and any attempt at reaching out to children is just recruitment.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 09:23 AM
20

So it looks like the inverse may be true. 99% of rape accusations are false.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 09:09 AM
7

No matter what you say to her, if your sister is a low quality woman, she will only attract lazy and/or manipulative men. I would bet that lazy and manipulative men can spot her from a mile away and her opinion is due to her only interacting with those types.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:26 PM
1

Its kinda hard to put into words.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 10:09 AM
3

I’m arguing with an ignorant fuckstick about Kamala No need to project. If you wanted to address the OP, why did you reply to my comment you ignorant fuckstick?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 09:44 PM
5

CA PC 1192.7 Pertinent portion: (3) If the indictment or information charges the defendant with a violent sex crime, as listed in subdivision (c) of Section 667.61, that could be prosecuted under Sections 269, 288.7, subdivisions (b) through (i) of Section 667, Section 667.61, or 667.71, plea bargaining is prohibited unless there is insufficient evidence to prove the people’s case, or testimony of a material witness cannot be obtained, or a reduction or dismissal would not result in a substantia…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 09:04 PM
5

you think Kamala is the only prosecutor who has done this shit? Did you forget that I mentioned that MY prosecutor did this shit? Can you NAME a prosecutor who became a politician who had done this shit? No? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:58 PM
5

They had verbal accusations which were quickly undermined by external records. I just didn't have proof that I was innocent. What tipped me off was when they offered me a deal. By law a deal can't be offered in CA unless the judge agrees that there isn't enough evidence to go to trial. Since all the DA had was the accusation, and all circumstantial evidence went my way, the deal meant that the DA knew I would win at trial.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:17 PM
6

Did your whataboutism make you feel better? Do you know any politicians other than Kamala that are confirmed to have falsified evidence as a DA?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:03 PM
7

It was 2 years and 2 weeks to be precise. I had many court dates during that time.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:52 PM
1

My public defender advised me to waive time. I eventually just ignored his advice.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:41 PM
26

I said Kamala Harris because she falsified evidence routinely when she was a DA in CA. I thought that was common knowledge.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:37 PM
63

CA PC 134 Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony. It's the "trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever" part that matters.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 12:13 PM
147

What 3rd world country is this? Same place as Kamala Harris.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 11:03 AM
327

Same thing happened to me except I sat in jail for 2 years before they dropped the charges when I refused the plea bargain. The DA even tried to use fake evidence to scare me into taking the deal. When I looked for lawyers to try to sue because the allegation was clearly false and the use of falsified evidence to try to scare me and my witnesses was corrupt, I was told that I had no case and that falsifying evidence is only a crime if it is presented to the court as evidence. Didn't even have an…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 10:38 AM
0

Using people who were born with life altering genetic and birth defects to backdoor sexual deviancy and the normalizing of delusional behavior is shameful.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:21 PM
-5

I think that keeping autogynephiles and other deviants out of girls restrooms will prevent more males from putting themselves in a position where they need to be restrained until the police arrive. Men aren't going to care if a female uses a stall in the men's room regardless of what she is wearing or what hormones she's taking. Perpetuating mental illness and ignorance of realities isn't going to help anybody, particularly men.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 10:22 PM
2

Because it is a conglomeration of the worst parts of the government agencies that it interfaces with.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:15 AM
22

"Reverse" harassment isn't against the rules.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:18 AM
22

Ya I saw that. Anyone with two braincells to rub together knows that the whole premise that post is based on is dogshit, but that sub is a dogshit premise echo chamber. You'd only be wasting your time trying to solve their problems when they just want to vent their feelings. That sub is just a cesspit of female stereotypes.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:36 AM
1

I don't think something that was published in 1880 is relevant at all to this subject. Anything from say, the last 50 years?
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:04 AM
1

If only the people who might care about this subject were capable of becoming historians and researching the subject and publishing the results of their research.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:57 AM
12

Is there any correlation between false accusations and skin color? I haven't heard of any studies done on the subject.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:13 PM
2

I think they are admitting that only men have agency.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:00 AM
1

Is it possible to get 3-4 inches out of that procedure? And if you can, how long would it take?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:34 AM
1

I wonder how many paid off their wives student loans so they could become housewives?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:24 AM
1

7 years you say? I wonder how long it takes, on average, for an MD to pay off student loans? I mean most MD's will have around a decade of a paid residency before they could open their own practice, but I still wonder if there is a correlation.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:13 AM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:03 AM
19

I think it is pretty well known now that women are the primary instigators of abusive relationships. Lesbian relationships are more likely to be abusive than straight or gay. If an abusive relationship is one-sided, the women is more likely to be the abuser.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:35 PM
5

Thomas Sowell was debunking wage gaps 40+years ago.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:20 PM
7

If I became my "truest self" I'd be very obese because I love to eat. I have to reject the temptation to overeat because it produces negative outcomes. I've been an atheist for decades, a "gold star" atheist even, and I've always denounced certain behaviors/choices in favor of others because of the outcomes produced rather than ideology. Keep doing what produces the best results for you and the people you care about.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 09:34 PM
13

I was accused of a horrific crime during my divorce and after the police cleared me I needed to be taken off the abusers list and a magistrate cleared me during a grievance hearing because CPS told him that they didn't do any investigation before putting me on the registry. After the decision, CPS said during the hearing that they still believed the allegations but they weren't going to investigate nor appeal the decision. The whole process was disturbing on so many levels.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 01:30 AM
10

Marriage was a gentlemen's agreement between husbands and fathers for the benefit of women and children by encouraging stability. But now the gentlemen are gone and husbands/fathers are going extinct.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:12 PM
77

Make this make sense. Women would rather be mad about what a man achieved than achieve it themselves, no matter how small?
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:37 AM
7

Female monkeys will accept resources in exchange for sex. It's not a coincidence that women value their strong "instincts".
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:14 PM
2

I definitely think the WGTOW movement would be villainized less than MGTOW movement though It would have to be villianized less because it would make women feel bad otherwise. Winemakers and antidepressant drugmakers would be supportive as well. I think that’s what you were getting at, right? In a way. MGTOW is not just villianized because men are finding happiness, but because, even though they deny it, women and society NEED men. Whereas society only needs women who are childbearing.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 07:51 PM
46

MGTOW is demonized because men are needed, particularly the stable established men. WGTOW would fly under the radar because society doesn't need their participation beyond the "sterile worker bee" role. And if the women wasn't post wall, she wouldn't be valuable as a mother anyways.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:21 AM
1

Then why didn't you say that instead of what you said? The first sentence refutes what you said, which is what I pointed out...
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:58 AM
1

Pointing out that the first sentence of the video completely undermines your argument is not "supporting the video" it's supporting truth. Dude...
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:55 AM
4

Damnit a sea lion...
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:51 AM
1

Can't believe you think this dogshit content farm style video is good content for this sub anyways. Why would you think that I think that? It would be easier to assume the opposite based on what I said in my original reply.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:50 AM
1

The misogynistic part is that this video tries to tie in that these women are getting mad at men for it (I don't think that's true) and implying that they should have just not had any career ambition, and stayed home barefoot and pregnant. Can you find me a video where a woman takes accountability for this choice and only blames themselves? I must have missed it.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:39 AM
2

It comes across as shaming women for having careers or waiting to have kids The first sentence of the video says the opposite. This is another video that talks about women "wanting to have their cake and eat it too", of which their are thousands of videos of. But this is one of the downsides of being a woman. My stepsister who is a successful career woman and is turning 40 this year just had her successful (slightly younger) husband leave her just after her in-vitro treatments failed last year. …
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:27 AM
4

GenZ is more conservative than the previous generation, it isn't enough to make a huge impact yet, but GenZ is showing that the idea that "ultimately: more liberal" is just not true. What are some examples of these cultural traditions? Strong family unit is an easy example. But this question wouldn't be asked by an MRA, so why are you here on this sub?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:06 AM
4

Are Muslims Nazis for hating jews? Are people from huge homogeneous countries like China and India Nazis for personally practicing anti-miscegenation? You can't hold the line against the hordes of dumb if you or the men on your left and right are afraid of their stupid ideas and will just turn tail and run.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:59 AM
3

I assume this is coming from the idea that Men's Rights arguments are seen as taboo and not given space in the mainstream the same way as you see conservative thought increasingly going. Sure, that is part of it. But being a man is a about standing strong in the face of the unknown. Can you really be a man if you are scared of people just communicating bad ideas? And what MRA argument could be made by someone who isn't a free speech advocate? A religious argument? A socialist argument? Those wil…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:40 AM
5

The people who want to enslave men weren't going to change their minds before the interview. You cant logic someone out of something they didn't logic themselves into. Can't be a MRA without being a free speech advocate for the most part anyways. If Nick Fuentes makes a bad argument, refute his argument with your own. We can all agree on most men's rights issues and then disagree on everything else. I'm a conservative atheist pro-life anarchist US Marine Corps veteran. I've yet to find someone w…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:59 AM
10

Thanks for bringing this up. I'll have to keep an eye out. I wonder if blacklisting or whitelisting specific users is a moderation tool used by some subs. I wouldn't be surprised if it was used by that sub as I have found it to be a groupthink sub that isn't a fan of critical thought.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 07:28 PM
1

Yep. A successful draft could only come from a pool of people who are not only capable of the job, but also have a sense of duty.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 12:24 PM
58

Women are terrible in combat so why would we expect to see any outside movies and propaganda?
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:17 AM
9

It looks like the British government has taken the position that if a pregnant women can do the job, that job can be moved to a country with zero human rights protections. Because that is exactly where these kinds of policies are going to take them.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 05:57 PM
49

Their religious ideology is falling apart and reasonable women are abandoning the belief system so the fanatics are trying to fill the gaps by being louder.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:20 PM
11

Depends on what the standard for "accusation" is. If you include the "no Nancy, we all saw you hanging on that ugly guy last night" type accusations, false accusations are way higher than true accusations.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:10 PM
7

She made an MRA channel to sell nudes to guys who consume both MRA content and pornography. A woman with untreated mental health problems who can only perpetuate the worst MRA stereotypes should just be avoided. Grifters can only regurgitate or backtrack when called out. A well researched MRA opponent would be better than a known grifters who just makes us look bad.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 10:28 PM
19

Why would we be worried about a cam girl grifting as an MRA getting banned?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 09:45 PM
3

I'm not going to watch the documentary, as soon as the intro called people who are attracted those under 18 pedophiles, I knew that the documentary wasn't going to make any good-faith arguments. A pedophile is someone who desires sexual activity with someone who is sexually immature and unable to produce offspring. The drive to produce offspring with someone who is sexually mature is NORMAL. This is how all sexually dimorphic species survive and perpetuate themselves. Western culture has just de…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 08:12 PM
16

She made it up to fit in. All the girls who confessed SA that night probably made it up... Regret and embarrassment after the fact does not change that is was consensual.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:55 AM
9

Yet almost every "Justice System" ever constructed is to enact revenge and to prevent further intrusions on innocents. Dana was innocent, and what happened was Justice.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 10:47 AM
0

Spikes compared to what? Half what it was? 1/10?1/1000? A healthy male will never deal with a spike of many times what it was over a month, nor a crash to nearly nothing.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 03:16 PM
-1

I'm talking about indirect causes and your talking about direct causes. Apple's and oranges. Holy shit...
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:11 PM
0

I'll leave the cringe part put as my personal opinion because I guess the article could be somewhat useful to someone who is completely ignorant on the subject. But if you want to find out why it is besides the point, I made other posts in this thread regarding this. Read those.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:02 PM
-1

That is besides the point, and kinda cringe.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 11:57 AM
2

Sorry, but we are talking about vastly different things here and I really don't have the time to hold your hand through basic human biology.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 11:51 AM
1

1) either hormones influence behavior or they don't Hormones can influence behavior directly or indirectly. Testosterone affects men directly whereas women's "hormonal" behavior is caused indirectly. Which is the crux of my point... 2) either we are sympathetic to how hormones make someone behave, or we aren't We can be sympathetic without making distracting and unhelpful apples-to-oranges comparisons. (#2 stinks of moving goalposts but I'll take the W.) It's because your opinion is a steaming p…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 10:37 AM
0

You're probably thinking of a daily cycle for men. But this is besides the point I made. You are talking about a direct cause of particular hormone. I am talking about the indirect causes of a hormone due to a dramatic change in its level over a short period of time.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 10:25 AM
1

It absolutely is comparable though. No it's not. Female "hormonal" behavior is due to the strife in their mind/body caused by the sudden dramatic shift in the levels of various hormones in a matter of days (even hours), but the level that particular hormone is currently at is perfectly normal (wouldn't be normal to stay that level though). Men never experience this with testosterone. It gradually rises over a handful of years during puberty, plateaus, then slowly falls over decades. Even if a ma…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 10:12 AM
2

Why does that matter in how we treat the fact that hormone influences behaviors? Because making comparisons between concepts that aren't comparable is unhelpful, even detrimental. imagine using the word "duh" as a grown ass adult Imagine lacking basic reading comprehension as a grown ass adult. Tragic...
/r/MensRights03/01/23 09:37 AM
-7

Testosterone has a LOT to do with sex drive. DUH My post was about hormone spikes and collapses, which men don't experience in their lifetimes (at least not the sex specific). Male libido is not due to a sudden rise or fall of testosterone, but it's mere presence. While female "hormonal" behavior is related to their respective spikes and collapses, not their mere presence. A simple Google search would have confirmed this...
/r/MensRights03/01/23 09:12 AM
-4

Ya sure....
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:41 AM
-13

Now you're just trolling.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:39 AM
-24

Do you have an argument to make? What I said is correct and isn't even controversial.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 07:57 AM
-47

This question makes bad assumptions. Women's "hormonal" behavior comes from their regular hormone spikes and crashes which literally define their lives and is completely outside the experience of a normal healthy man. A man's libido is not related to hormones the way a woman's emotions can be.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:26 AM
3

If you state your opinions and all you hear back is preloaded buzzwords, you've hit paydirt. You won't catch flak until you're over the target. It may be tiring to constantly get negative feedback, but remember that you are making the environment safe for people to change their minds. There are conversations I had decades ago when I was a dumb kid that didn't sink in until years later. Keep up the good fight.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:16 AM
5

Creepy Hollywood weirdos: If you break off a piece for me and all my buddies I'll make you the first female action movie star. JLaw: OK! Creepy dudes: Lol JLaw: I'm the first woman to trade sex for resources like EVER and it makes me a strong representation of women everywhere!
/r/MensRights10/12/22 11:23 PM
3

No resentment except that I lost a friendship. I was kinda isolated because my family was across the Pacific and my job as the deck sgt was to babysit the people I lived with. It only lasted a year but it was a rough year. The guy was also having a rough time and I sympathized with that. Unfortunately he wanted more than someone to chill with.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:22 AM
2

Funny thing is that the first time I ever turned down sex was with a gay man. I was about 24 and was married three years with a 2 year old and a newborn. I was stationed a MCAS Iwakuni, Japan but my wife and kids were in our hometown in CA for that year, so I lived in the barracks. The guy was Navy and was in the middle of getting discharged for being gay. I knew this but we hung out because our hobbies and backgrounds overlapped. Him being gay was irrelevant. One night he went to kiss me and I …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:13 AM
6

I wasn't taught anything different. The idea that I could push these women away wasn't something that crossed my mind. Like it was my duty or something. But I gained nothing substantial, only the drama that comes with getting involved with people who wanted to use me to make themselves feel better. I was raised by a single mother who had a toxic view of chivalry. I love my mom but she only saw men from the outside which skewed her perspective dramatically.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:54 AM
8

I wish someone had taught me how to turn women down 25 years ago but none of the men in my life back then ever had to deal with the kind of attention from women that I got. Now that my children are mostly grown, I can see how destructive fulfilling the needs of women over my own was to every aspect of my life. If you aren't the kind of guy who can discard the woman along with the condom, stay celebate until you find the right gal to be monogamous with. The 25 years older you will thank you.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:39 AM
7

So... Only black men are punished for a false accusation or people would have reacted the same to a black woman being accused? I would have said that nobody would buy that BS but we live in interesting times.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:57 AM
73

Can't wait to see how they twist this away from being an issue about false accusation.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:39 AM
5

It's good when anyone starts to recognize the obvious, but let's not forget that Vaush is evil.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:32 PM
35

Yang just says whatever he thinks will get people to support his political career. He is the worst kind of politician and there is no reason to believe that he won't flip on a dime for a bribe.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 08:35 PM
2

Since men work more to make more money, the bill definitely discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:16 PM
5

I sat in jail for two years and the prosecutors fabricated evidence to try to scare me into taking a deal. I pushed for trial until they dropped the charges.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:30 PM
7

Why Women Think Vabbing Works on Men? Because, like all things that women think work on men, it works on women. Women think that being masculine and making lots of money is attractive to men because women are self centered and think that if they are attracted to something, it must be attractive to everybody.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:07 PM
30

Such a subreddit would have too much facts and logic so it would be a lot less fun than waving a wand over your vagina repeatedly. Masturbatory pun intended...
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:04 PM
24

the cops also tell me that due to my martial arts experience, which I notified them about when they entered the room, This looked really bad for me. I notified them because I sat on the floor initially to appear unthreatening. I was wearing my old jiu jitsu shirt as pajamas. Umm... What? I'll try to take this post seriously and advise that you abandon ship immediately because it will only get worse.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:12 PM
9

Discussing legitimate statistics is not bias nor misandry. Men and women have inherent, fundamental differences, and those differences will be expressed in different ways. Pointing out those differences, using the sauce, is the opposite of bias.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:43 PM
-2

"Hate Speech" is a stupid concept and should be rejected because irrelevant labels are just a distraction. People have a right to their opinions, and we should encourage people to voice them so we can properly refute them.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:32 PM
7

Thank you for admitting that. Women wanting to have control over the wants and needs of men, and not having to take responsibility for providing the things that men want in order to find a partner was the point of this post. You trying to project negative qualities onto me for understanding the concepts being discussed is pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:49 PM
13

No, she was saying that some men want second mothers and that certain qualities are not to be expected in women as desirable.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:42 PM
23

I did write a logical comment. You just can't follow the logic because you have a preconceived notion that interferes with that ability.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:39 PM
15

No.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:38 PM
23

I can't make it make sense for you.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:36 PM
20

The post talks about how men want women who provide certain things as part of the relationship. It is easy to infer that the more a women provides these things, the higher quality that woman is to men who want those qualities. You can't possibly disagree with that unless you think that men should be forced to date low quality women.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:31 PM
30

This is hard to reply to as it's so jumbled up! It's hard to reply to because it refutes your beliefs. Read #1. It talks about how men rely on women for certain things. Don't women rely on men for certain things? But it is women who want the things from men without earning it by being a partner who provide the things a man wants. If you want to die alone to prove your point you are welcome to it.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:26 PM
53

This post is about how the woman wants to have a high quality man without being a high quality woman. The OP rejects the requirements of a high quality woman as "mothering". But women across the board reject the male role of taking responsibility, accountability, and working hard, and instead want the government to force society to provide women the benefits of having had those qualities.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:07 PM
42

It is just arrogance and projection. They believe that a group of men would always be worse, no matter how bad their behavior gets. We see this with people who claim that the US is a "racist country" when it is the least racist country (regarding the behavior of individuals).
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:57 PM
61

This is just another post made by women who hate "Mothers" and want all the benefits of men without have to earn it.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:49 PM
18

That I can withstand a lot of adversity and abuse and it won't affect my perception of reality.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 11:13 PM
8

I don’t hold mens rights groups to any higher standard than I hold feminists, it’s just that men are the ones who make crap laws, not women. Then why label men's righteous indignation as misogyny? All politicians learned that manipulating women was a faster route to power than good policy decades ago. This is the fault of women being easily swayed by slogans and emotional appeals. There are issues with laws that treat men like money-funnels and women like broodmares, but it isn’t feminists creat…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 06:52 AM
10

You describe a problem that happens to people in general, but trying to hold Men's Rights groups to a much higher standard is unfair and counterproductive. bitter men who seek to get revenge on women for stupid laws that MALE POLITICIANS put into place Bitter due to women taking advantage of men's good intentions and male politicians taking advantage of women's inherent weaknesses and bad intentions.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:10 AM
13

Any Men's Rights group will be slandered as "woman hating" without any evidence to support the claim. It's rule #5.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:14 AM
19

They could control it if they wanted to. Here is an issue that has been brought up before on this sub concerning a likely presidential candidate for 2024. The woman/simp demographic is a huge voting bloc for every politician.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:51 AM
87

Why would politicians care about men's rights? They can afford lawyers for themselves and they aren't going to risk losing woman's votes and men's money. It is just too easy to control women's votes with slogans and emotional appeals and women are more than happy to vote for less accountability and more of men's money. Welcome to the PatriarchyTM !
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:59 AM
30

Some women literally need a man to strong arm their way onto the woman's life and force stability on them. This was something that commonly occurred throughout human history and is actually a good reproductive strategy. If a man is strong enough to make her and her environment stable, he is strong enough to provide stability for a family. We don't live in a society where this reproductive strategy is practical anymore, but that doesn't change women's instincts. If you find yourself with a women …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:38 AM
2

Patriarchy is just a weird way to say "functioning society".
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:32 PM
33

Because accountability is not an STD...
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:16 AM
1

The fake DNA "evidence" was not sent directly to my public defender until after the charges were dropped and refiled a year in. It took me months to figure out that: a. The "evidence" had not been entered into the court record. b. It had not been entered into the record with the court because it was illegal to do so. The delay tactics were to get me to take a plea bargain. I just had to call their bluff long enough in the right way.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:18 AM
26

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind...
/r/MensRights25/11/21 11:40 PM
4

A woman having sex with a man to convince him to marry him? Say it ain't so!
/r/MensRights17/10/21 10:22 PM
30

Laws are not implemented or enforced for the Public Good, they are implemented and enforced to increase the legitimacy and power of the Government first and foremost. The trick is to make the Public Good into something that increases the power and legitimacy of the Government.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:56 AM
10

There were reasons why the vast majority of women opposed suffrage, now their great granddaughters get to relearn those reasons the hard way.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 06:43 AM
2

Before I start the long version, I think I should clarify the short version. Public Defenders and Assistant DA's working together to make their jobs easier is not some kind of conspiracy. Take my case for example. If I took the plea bargain offered, my Public Defender would have gotten me an absolutely golden, sweetheart deal, while the Assistant DA could have put another convicted rapist on her resume. Them putting tons of effort into my case wouldn't have changed that outcome much from their p…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:39 AM
3

Great question. Short answer is that public defenders and assistant District Attorneys work together to make each other's jobs easier. I'll reply with the long answer when I have the time later.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:53 AM
13

I was falsely accused. I sat in jail for two years before the charges were dropped. The DA fabricated DNA evidence to try to scare me into taking a plea bargain. The plea bargain was a release on day of signing with probation, if convicted at trial I could have been sentenced from 60 years to life. Luckily my major in college was biology, and the false DNA report didn't phase me at all. After 20 months, the detective went back to the supposed victim and she changed her entire story, made it so r…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 07:14 AM
2

I disagree in that it seems that it is acceptable to reject men based on physical characteristics but not women. I think everybody should be able to reject anybody for any reason.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 12:54 AM
3

My ex wife of 15 years has BPD with comorbid PTSD and drug abuse. I'm a foot taller and more than twice her mass. Still didn't make her propensity for physical violence less disconcerting. I wish I had known her toxicity was unacceptable from the beginning, no matter what her reasons/excuses were.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 04:13 AM
2

Why is this cut off?
/r/MensRights31/05/21 11:35 PM
2

Kenjataimu is a Japanese term for post-nut clarity. NoKenjataimu is an interesting username for someone who is arguing in favor of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:32 AM
2

Did you notice the username of the person being replied too?
/r/MensRights24/05/21 06:58 AM
13

That is a troll account.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:19 AM
57

My guess is that men are much more likely to stand by their decisions and uphold their oaths.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 10:24 PM
4

Had a visit last night with my youngest two children for the first time in six months. Had to be over zoom because my ex is literally crazy (BPD). I could hear her coaching my 11yo son to tell me that he didn't want to talk to me. Unluckily I was dumb enough to have children with a woman stupid enough to blatantly commit Parental Alienation within earshot of of the IPad they were using. I forwarded the recording of the incident to my lawyer this morning. I wonder how many months before the court…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 06:22 AM
2

She was a police officer for 26 years. She should have had the automatic muscle memory drilled into her 24 years ago. Pistol holsters and taser holsters have different retentions and different locations and thus draw completely differently and their draw and deployment are intentionally different for very important reasons. Don't confuse your video games with real life.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 06:53 PM
3

Great comment but I want to bite on this: What about this makes this a Mens Rights Issue? Kim Potter was a police officer for 26 years. She drew her pistol, and with her finger on the trigger, flagged her male partner 3 times, then negligently discharged her pistol before she even realized she had her pistol in her hand. These quota fillers are a danger to everybody. Even 26 years isn't enough time to get the basic training and muscle memory down when their competence isn't a factor for job secu…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 06:41 PM
1

This is the mental gymnastics required when you wake up next to a naked man after a bender.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:42 PM
14

Unwanted eye contact is on the list.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:35 AM
13

You can't know those definitions, you can only feel them as part of your personal truth.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 06:17 PM
4

I never went to the police because I've heard of how they responded to my friend trying to report her rape (threw it out immediately). This is not how it works in the United States. The police are required to file written reports regardless of their personal feelings. The prosecutor's office then decides what to do with those reports. If you don't live in the US disregard but I'd question the validity of your friends claim. And because I was under pressure to keep a sense of normalcy so I put on…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 08:25 AM
1

A rape not worth going to the police for? The police could find evidence that wasn't obvious to you, or the person could have been accused/convicted before. Hell, the police may have felt inclined to fabricate some evidence if none existed.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 08:07 AM
5

The biological differences aren't big enough to ignore individual merit.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 01:08 AM
1

That was a direct quote if you read the article.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:16 AM
11

The MRA movement has been criticised for teaching men that women are to blame for their unhappiness, that they lie, cheat, trick and manipulate. MRA also teaches that men are dominant over women and that they are entitled to women’s bodies. How could you link that article with any kind of seriousness? That is just propaganda for the ignorant.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 08:04 PM
6

If you stand up to female supremacists in the slightest they will smear you with all the acronyms they can think of. Get over it. Do your own research. Find a foundational argument you are comfortable with and build from there. You will be vilified if you don't toe the line. Standing up for yourself is against their rules.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:15 PM
5

It's also about replacing family structures with government.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:20 AM
4

Wouldn't they be praising Saudi Arabia for not appropriating western culture?
/r/MensRights29/12/20 08:21 AM
28

They are called jail bait for reasons. Your friend is on a couple resumes under "sex offenders convicted".
/r/MensRights28/12/20 08:23 AM
8

Ask for everything and force them to negotiate from there. It's called "The Big Ask". Use this tactic in every situation you can. If you don't fight for yourself, no one will.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 04:37 AM
-1

Even though there are laws to try an prevent that kind of behaviour that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Not surprising. Criminals break laws, laws don't stop criminals by definition. Gay men face issues straight men also face but they often get an extra layer of discrimination because of homophobia. Do you believe this discrimination extends to men's rights issues (mostly lopsided enforcement and judgments compared to women)? All the data I have seen it does not.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 11:55 PM
4

Do they have assault and battery type laws in England? Harassment? Stalking laws? If they do are they not enforced? Does getting beat up by people who don't like you hurt more if you are gay?
/r/MensRights25/12/20 11:35 PM
11

Settlements for false allegations. Most places you have to sue the false accuser unless law enforcement knew it to be false.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 07:39 AM
8

Do they do that in Kenya?
/r/MensRights19/12/20 07:20 AM
12

My ex is like this too. Hate themselves to the point that they want people to hurt them, they believe they deserve it. I unfortunately never got this behavior on camera.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:07 PM
10

Biden is a mistake. Always has been.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:44 AM
9

I'm not joking either. They set the rules, use the rules to your advantage or quit the game.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:18 PM
10

Buy a wig and some lipstick and self-identify as winner.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 07:31 PM
2

You get your info about men from toxic female oriented TV? You must be a woman. No self-respecting man would make that mistake. But clearly you lost your self-respect long before you came here to make straw mans of arguments you do not understand so you can make yourself feel better.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:16 AM
1

Thanks for proving my point. A bachelor is an unmarried man. But why is he unmarried? This is where the distinction lies.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:50 AM
4

MGTOW is more about a man purposefully avoiding women in a more broader societal sense, rejecting matriarchal and feminist influences on his personal life. Whereas a bachelor is a man who is avoiding a personal intimate relationship with a woman as a part of his life.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:48 AM
0

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:34 AM
1

A man who is voluntarily celibate is a bachelor. A happy bachelor is not going to be bothered by someone calling him an incel, because he is not an incel and he knows it.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:12 AM
1

The problem with that is that a person who wants to have sex but can't is literally involuntarily celibate. Just like retarded people are literally retarded and fat people are literally fat. Using anything about someone as an insult is just an insult. Using the term incel as an insult is no different from any other term as an insult and just as cruel.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:00 AM
2

Sexual selection is a thing of course, its one of the biggest drivers of evolution in a lot of ways. Having said that, in American society whore/slut is a badge of honor for the women who behave that way, while men are derided anyway regardless. Whether it is an "incel" who is just working on getting himself in a good place to get a date or a "patriarchal oppressor" with a happy wife and kids. Insults being thrown at men by man haters is just the times we live in.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 02:47 AM
-2

You can make choices that result in you being an incel however. Fat ugly women who will only date rich handsome men is an example of someone who chooses to be an incel. If a man is called an incel just as an insult then it is simply an insult. A fat ugly man can choose to be a bachelor, a happy bachelor in fact. Calling a man who is happy being a bachelor won't prevent him from being happy. Choose to be happy.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 02:34 AM
-2

I wouldn't say never. It is rare for a woman to be an actual incel, most are effectively an incel because they set their standards wayyy too high. I wouldn't say that every time a man fails in a relationship it is his fault, but I would say it is his fault if he keeps trying the same thing that fails every time without reconsidering the situation. And clearly women are capable of failure in a relationship. No honest person would argue that.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 02:24 AM
-4

If it is just a baseless insult then it should be treated as such. Most people have to deal with insults thrown at them at some point in their lives. If someone keeps trying to do something, anything, and keeps failing, they need to rethink their strategy and situation. This applies to a man who stops and realizes he is an incel and then changes what he needs to stop being an incel, one way or another. And Incel works just as well for women. There are many female Incels. r/ femaledatingstrategy …
/r/MensRights30/11/20 02:15 AM
-4

Bachelor is the term for a man who doesn't seek out relationships with women. Involuntary Celibate or "Incel" is a term for men who do seek relationships with women but are unsuccessful. Being either a bachelor or Incel is a choice.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 02:01 AM
5

Aren't those the symptoms of Hysteria? Pretty sure they make battery operated devices to help alleviate that now.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 06:50 PM
2

Controlling women and using them as leverage against men is just too easy. It is going to be an uphill battle for sure.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:24 AM
6

Many arguments popular on reddit could not withstand any intellectual challenge. The people that believe these arguments with religious fervor have walled themselves off from growth and change for the better, they have lost the ability to become a better version of themselves. Why have they done this to themselves? Fear of having been wrong or a narcissistic view of themselves already reaching intellectual perfection would the big two guesses for me.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 07:52 PM
2

Good question. The most easily defensible position for the government to take would be yes, the time limits should be equal. But I can make strong arguments for more and less time.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 05:41 AM
5

Yes, with the time limit being 7-8 months of the man being informed that a pregnancy had occurred.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 03:47 AM
16

I'd just say awareness at this point. I talked to my divorce lawyer and she acknowledged that men's rights was an issue and she would try to overcome what bias she could so I could get custody from my ex who has mental health and drug issues that frequently result in violent outbursts. That she didn't just wave away my concerns and was able to explain in legal terms how men's rights was an issue in my state/county was a good thing and shows that we are moving in the right direction.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 03:06 AM
2

That woman clearly had no self-awareness. I would have responded "wow that old huh?" But to answer your main question, no, every aspect of a man is open to criticism at any time by anyone. I think that is a good thing though. People who can't handle and are unprepared for criticism will be stunted and disillusioned.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:58 PM
2

Late-stage feminism is going to be when feminists realize that the 50's was when women were treated special just for being women.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:23 AM
-10

I am pretty sure being afraid of surprise penises is literally transphobic.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 11:35 PM
17

As an American, everything should be innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 06:51 PM
2

The link wouldn't work for me so I have some questions. Has this society ever faced significant war or famine? Ever had to change geographic location under duress? Is there a genetic component that correlates with this culture? To what degree does this society promote sexual dimorphism?
/r/MensRights07/10/20 02:48 AM
8

A good conservative understands the arguments against his positions and rejects them on their merits. "It is a sign of an intelligent mind the ability to consider a thing without accepting it "
/r/MensRights07/10/20 02:26 AM
3

If a CA court even took such a concept seriously, it would be separate from child support. Like use the money judgement from the one case to pay the other from your account.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 11:09 PM
3

CA law allows DCSS to act on a parent's behalf without their consent. DCSS can take you to court and get judgments against you without your ex being aware.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 10:35 PM
5

If she is on any kind of government handout you will not be able to keep DCSS (Department of Child Support Services) out of it. If you both have jobs and she is amicable you may end up super lucky. DCSS only employs feminazis in my experience. They will lie to you and misrepresent your rights at every turn. Their only goal is to extract money from you.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 10:33 PM
10

If you are not cohabitating then she may have to show that you are the father. See if you can force a DNA test before you are named the father. I myself am dealing with CA child support and that agency is terrible. They automatically garnish wages for support no matter what. There is no way to stop them from involving your employer in your personal business. You don't have to have contact but you will PAY.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 10:24 PM
35

Wait, this can't be evidence that quotas became a crutch that undermined the whole concept can it? No, it is the hiring managers who are wrong.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 01:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter