TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Altruistic-Suit-2318 Archive

View 7 posts and 37 comments by Altruistic-Suit-2318 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The people that idly watch as a woman assaults a man but step in as soon as the man defends himself are the worst...
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:10 AM
3

Well, then I guess you can just reword my question. Why do financiers keep pulling funds even if the candidate they're backing insists that the accusations are false? If you like a candidate enough to the point where you're willing to donate thousands, if not millions, to their campaign, why would you suddenly drop them because of some random accusation? I guess it could be that they don't believe in the candidate's ability to win anymore. That would mean the issue is society's mindless gravitat…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:29 PM
0

It's crazy that approval actually shifts that much based on an accusation alone. I wonder what would happen if it happens to someone that's almost universally loved within their party, like Zohran Mamdani. Would people still mindlessly believe the accuser?
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:27 PM
1

I think this is the Democrat elites' favorite move to get rid of candidates they don't like. Am I missing anything?
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:25 PM
4

I guess the solution is to avoid women if you're ambitious. Otherwise she, or someone controlling her, will pull you down with allegations alone
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:24 PM
21

"This is not a woman's problem," Dr Arif said. "This is a societal problem. If we get it right for women, we get it right for everyone." What a joke! If you replaced "woman" with "man" they would be going batshit, even though it follows from the same premise. This person is a doctor too...
/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:50 PM
3

I agree. The stance that some have, though, is that periods/menopause/pregnancies disadvantage women so we need DEI policies to correct for those impairments. They don't take into account the disadvantages men face, because they aren't as obvious (doesn't mean they aren't as impactful) as something like periods.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:37 PM
3

I agree. The struggles that we face at a biological level (like higher libidos) are villainized too. I hadn't previously thought of how biologically higher libido costs men at a systemic level. I feel that you're a deep thinker, so I'm curious: what argument would you make to support the claim that men have it significantly harder in society? Would you say that's the case regardless of a society's development level? (the reason I ask that is because people often say, "oh, in the West, it's def _…
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:29 PM
1

I'm sorry you've had such an experience. The reason I made this post is that I find it hard to believe that 20% of women are experiencing pain at the same level that you are. Again, your case seems very difficult, and I empathize with that. If 20% of women are enduring 1-2 days of debilitating pain every month, I don't understand how I haven't observed it. Is it common for women to take a few days off monthly for cases like this?
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:24 PM
1

I added a clarification to my post. For your convenience, here's the corrected version: "For a long time, I dismissed period pain as exaggerated due to how it hadn't perceptibly affected the behavior of those around me. For example, if you report that you're experiencing extreme pain, but are going on about your day just as you were before your period, chances are you aren't experiencing extreme pain." Sorry if it sounds harsh, I hope you're able to understand the point I'm trying to make. You s…
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:19 PM
2

Certain policies, like DEI, disadvantage men with the assumption that women have it harder. I'm trying to better understand the potential merit behind such arguments. I agree that it's more productive to focus on policy problems rather than having a debate on "who has it harder." It's just that the latter comes into play when evaluating policies that are very consequential to men, particularly those that seek to "create a level playing field." Hope you understand.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 02:57 PM
1

I'm going to steal that!
/r/MensRights12/05/26 09:44 PM
22

Prayers for Australian men...
/r/MensRights12/05/26 02:59 AM
27

"Happy wife, happy life," which is now common "wisdom," says enough about marriage...
/r/MensRights11/05/26 11:22 PM
1

Second this! Thank you for sharing your story with us, brother.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 11:15 PM
111

Yes. When you point it out, they'll tell you that the women are more qualified. However, no such logic exists when men advance at higher rates. That would be sexism! At MIT, for example, the acceptance rate for women is twice that of men. This pattern has persisted cleanly for decades. But there's obviously no discrimination against men -- they're just less qualified!
/r/MensRights10/05/26 08:31 PM
8

Men have larger bodies and exhale more CO2! They're destroying our environment!
/r/MensRights07/05/26 02:02 AM
9

Let me guess: the female genital mutilation map hasn't been messed with?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:59 AM
6

I've always found it disgusting when people emphasize "women and children" among casualties. Are men not humans? Push back every time you hear that shit!
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:54 PM
4

This trend has been framed the "male loneliness epidemic" as a PSYOP to try to get us to start dating again. Really, it's women that are losing more from men stepping away. Don't fall for that bullshit and live your life to its fullest!
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:53 PM
3

Those meters are built by radical feminists. They'll connect an "equality" measure to a happiness and state that feminism makes societies happier.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:47 PM
41

Use the "Women Only" changing room. If they get riled up about it, say that you identify as a woman.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:45 PM
6

What the HELL is going on in Australia???
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:05 PM
17

Yes, do not let this go. Try to keep it unknown that you are the person taking action, as you don't want to place a target on your back unnecessarily. This means being careful about who you seek to build a coalition with (don't trust everyone indicating support; some are just double agents!). This could be a stretch, but there are also devices that can record audio and/or video that technically aren't phones. You can look into trying to use those devices to gather evidence, but I'd recommend tha…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 09:48 PM
9

The thing is, they've conducted a PSYOP to the point where the word "incel" is near-exclusively tied to men. This is why you'll hear words like "femcel," because the idea of a woman being an involuntary celibate has been made so foreign that we need to create an adjacent term.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:48 AM
3

Then we need to build better camaraderie amongst ourselves so that that men don't feel that they need women to overcome loneliness. A member of MensRights also posted an article recently describing how we're seeing a rising trend of men relying on "AI girlfriends" (and potentially even robots in the future), which erodes the leverage women have over horny men in particular. I'm personally not a fan of AI-driven degeneracy, but it could reduce the number of horny men that get manipulated into bei…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:44 AM
4

Many feminists are pro-choice, and they push the idea that a fetus does not yet have the same moral status as a born person. They also believe that it can be morally acceptable to terminate a pregnancy if the expected conditions of life would lead to significant suffering. Regardless of whether you are pro-choice or pro-life, the above stance is inherently contradictory. In instances of families aborting girls in favor of boys, they suddenly frame the fetus as invaluable and condemn the family f…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:32 AM
4

Glad to hear this news, brother. Do whatever you can to get involved! I hope the momentum you and your compatriots build can spread worldwide.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:19 AM
1

Simultaneously, the NYT is publishing articles like: War Shatters Dating Scene for Women in Ukraine
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:17 AM
12

Yes, I think discrimination in the West is concentrated against men, Whites, and Asians (East and South). I'm very skeptical of the "equally qualified resumes" claim these types of studies mention. I guess one of us has to infiltrate one of these research labs and see what they're really sending out.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 03:12 AM
3

Men seriously need to start putting their foot down when it comes to the constant disrespect and double standards. If someone is openly anti-male, we should treat them the same way you would any other form of prejudice. Socially, that kind of attitude should be isolating. We need to make them pariahs. And yeah, this applies to everyday stuff too. If someone makes it clear they don’t respect men, they can move their own furniture, open their own jars, figure things out themselves. You don’t get t…
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:56 PM
6

Due process should apply to everyone. If we believe in pushing back against unproven allegations, that standard has to be consistent. Dismissing someone’s rights just because they’ve been accused of wrongdoing is exactly the kind of thinking we’re opposing.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 12:50 AM
7

Thanks for informing me of Bettina Arndt, she seems like a wonderful person! With regard to how Swalwell was "banging Chinese spies and hookers" -- were any of these things proved or were they just allegations? Not trying to spark an argument, I'm just curious Moreover, even if he is a scumbag, I still think it's important for us to support due process Appreciate your comment nonetheless!
/r/MensRights12/04/26 12:44 AM
5

Grateful to hear that you're this committed to our cause, brother. What do you mean by "we need to be a little more extreme, in how we give our time to others?"
/r/MensRights12/04/26 12:32 AM
14

Got it. I feel like false allegations against men were the worst in the early to mid 2010s. Absolutely agree that these male Democrats are selling out and the "believe all women" rhetoric needs to stop. I believe high-profile cases like Johnny Depp have been shifting public perception in the right direction. Hopefully a politically notable figure being affected, especially one who supports the ridiculous narrative, leads to more balanced thinking long term.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 11:37 PM
17

Absolutely. Any ideas on how we can create change? Personally, I've just been speaking the truth without censoring myself in public (pointing out double standards, asking people to stay consistent, pushing back on assumptions, and so on). It's not anything radical, and it certainly isn't enough.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 11:31 PM
28

I’m really sorry you went through that. That sounds like an awfully difficult and frustrating experience, and I appreciate you sharing your story. May I ask what year this happened in? It’s interesting too, seeing how situations like this can shift perspectives. Even someone like Eric Swalwell, who has supported “believe all women,” is now facing how complex these situations can be. Maybe moments like this can start more balanced conversations and lead to meaningful change.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 10:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter